Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients

Objective: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) is an important cause of poor asthma control in pediatric patients. Among the factors that can be most easily changed for enhancing adherence to ICs is a reduction in the dosing frequency, from twice-daily dosing to once-daily dosing....

Full description

Autores:
Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.
Sossa-Briceño, Monica P.
Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/3701
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/3701
https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
Palabra clave:
Adherence
Asthma
Cost-effectiveness
Inhaled corticosteroids
Quality-adjusted life years
Rights
openAccess
License
Acceso abierto
id UNBOSQUE2_72680dd7c1c543eccfaa93a000be0919
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/3701
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
title Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
spellingShingle Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
Adherence
Asthma
Cost-effectiveness
Inhaled corticosteroids
Quality-adjusted life years
title_short Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
title_full Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
title_fullStr Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
title_sort Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.
Sossa-Briceño, Monica P.
Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.
Sossa-Briceño, Monica P.
Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Adherence
Asthma
Cost-effectiveness
Inhaled corticosteroids
Quality-adjusted life years
topic Adherence
Asthma
Cost-effectiveness
Inhaled corticosteroids
Quality-adjusted life years
description Objective: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) is an important cause of poor asthma control in pediatric patients. Among the factors that can be most easily changed for enhancing adherence to ICs is a reduction in the dosing frequency, from twice-daily dosing to once-daily dosing. However, no previous studies have reported an economic evaluation comparing once-daily versus twice-daily IC dosing for pediatric asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily IC dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients. Methods: A Markov-type model was developed in order to estimate costs and health outcomes of a simulated cohort of pediatric patients with persistent asthma treated over a 12-month period. Effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Cost data were obtained from official databases provided by the Colombian Ministry of Health. The main outcome was the variable “quality-adjusted life-years” (QALYs). Results: For the base-case analysis, the model showed that compared with twice-daily dosing, once-daily dosing strategy involved lower costs (US$1529.3 versus $1709.1 average cost per patient over 12 months) and the greatest gain in QALYs (0.8284 versus 0.8084 QALYs on average per patient over 12 months), resulting in once-daily dosing strategy being considered dominant. Conclusions: This study shows that compared with twice-daily dosing, once-daily IC dosing for treating pediatric patients with persistent asthma is the dominant strategy because it involves a greater gain in QALYs at lower total treatment cost.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:56:35Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:56:35Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1532-4303
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/3701
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 1532-4303
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/3701
https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv The Journal of Asthma, 1532-4303, Vol. 53, Nro. 5, 2016, p. 538–545
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Acceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-19
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
2016-01-19
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv The Journal of Asthma
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/992301c5-25ba-4626-a8b1-71aa59b48b57/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/86ea66f4-271a-4479-bcb9-855dd6e30a03/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/13d05f23-2db0-4129-8118-52c43171e6ca/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/3258e909-fe42-409a-9b1a-c8240a577254/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/abe3970c-ed42-454f-bb55-788577e5e335/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 51be25189f7333a50a7b4fbdae415d3c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7
d8459006aa0e333215fe739c75e958d1
fd5ca6744fca5d3b54181274fb4df2dd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1814100802135916544
spelling Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.Sossa-Briceño, Monica P.Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.2020-08-06T16:56:35Z2020-08-06T16:56:35Z1532-4303http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/3701https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquehttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengTaylor and FrancisThe Journal of AsthmaThe Journal of Asthma, 1532-4303, Vol. 53, Nro. 5, 2016, p. 538–545https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116087Cost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patientsCost–utility analysis of once-daily versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patientsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85AdherenceAsthmaCost-effectivenessInhaled corticosteroidsQuality-adjusted life yearsObjective: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) is an important cause of poor asthma control in pediatric patients. Among the factors that can be most easily changed for enhancing adherence to ICs is a reduction in the dosing frequency, from twice-daily dosing to once-daily dosing. However, no previous studies have reported an economic evaluation comparing once-daily versus twice-daily IC dosing for pediatric asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily IC dosing for maintenance treatment of asthma in pediatric patients. Methods: A Markov-type model was developed in order to estimate costs and health outcomes of a simulated cohort of pediatric patients with persistent asthma treated over a 12-month period. Effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Cost data were obtained from official databases provided by the Colombian Ministry of Health. The main outcome was the variable “quality-adjusted life-years” (QALYs). Results: For the base-case analysis, the model showed that compared with twice-daily dosing, once-daily dosing strategy involved lower costs (US$1529.3 versus $1709.1 average cost per patient over 12 months) and the greatest gain in QALYs (0.8284 versus 0.8084 QALYs on average per patient over 12 months), resulting in once-daily dosing strategy being considered dominant. Conclusions: This study shows that compared with twice-daily dosing, once-daily IC dosing for treating pediatric patients with persistent asthma is the dominant strategy because it involves a greater gain in QALYs at lower total treatment cost.Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto2016-01-19ORIGINALRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdfRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdfapplication/pdf960873https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/992301c5-25ba-4626-a8b1-71aa59b48b57/download51be25189f7333a50a7b4fbdae415d3cMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/86ea66f4-271a-4479-bcb9-855dd6e30a03/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52THUMBNAILRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.pdf.jpgRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/13d05f23-2db0-4129-8118-52c43171e6ca/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD53Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdf.jpgRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8662https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/3258e909-fe42-409a-9b1a-c8240a577254/downloadd8459006aa0e333215fe739c75e958d1MD54TEXTRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdf.txtRodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E..pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain48091https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/abe3970c-ed42-454f-bb55-788577e5e335/downloadfd5ca6744fca5d3b54181274fb4df2ddMD5520.500.12495/3701oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/37012024-02-07 07:39:20.638restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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