Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
Objective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive...
- Autores:
-
Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana
Vargas Laverde, Jonathan
Mariño Samper, Elsa
Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades
Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya
labrecque, michel
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/2393
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001
- Palabra clave:
- Conducta de reducción del riesgo
Riesgo aceptable
Estudio comparativo
Vasectomy
Ligation
Excision
- Rights
- License
- Acceso cerrado
id |
UNBOSQUE2_723f1d66095f3ef89eafe26fc415bed3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/2393 |
network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
dc.title.translated.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
title |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
spellingShingle |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study Conducta de reducción del riesgo Riesgo aceptable Estudio comparativo Vasectomy Ligation Excision |
title_short |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
title_full |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
title_fullStr |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
title_sort |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana Vargas Laverde, Jonathan Mariño Samper, Elsa Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya labrecque, michel |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana Vargas Laverde, Jonathan Mariño Samper, Elsa Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya labrecque, michel |
dc.subject.decs.spa.fl_str_mv |
Conducta de reducción del riesgo Riesgo aceptable Estudio comparativo |
topic |
Conducta de reducción del riesgo Riesgo aceptable Estudio comparativo Vasectomy Ligation Excision |
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Vasectomy Ligation Excision |
description |
Objective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-26T19:52:00Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-26T19:52:00Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
artículo |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0010-7824 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
identifier_str_mv |
0010-7824 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
Contraception, 0010-7824, 2020 |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(20)30053-6/pdf |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso cerrado |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf221 |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Acceso cerrado http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf221 2020 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Contraception |
institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9afc47d3-e416-45d8-903e-2873c90a7dd8/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9435fb93-4dca-4b6a-b0db-dbf8a1f4365b/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/f3f0f5ed-fe71-4459-ae44-853698e66c0e/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/4a101f29-f891-4f06-a49b-7feed60adb38/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7 be9189a3221d623612c451aca056093e 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 d47e11067e7f2d169f6b3b6d69ea5605 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
_version_ |
1814100721098817536 |
spelling |
Miranda Claro, Silvia JulianaVargas Laverde, JonathanMariño Samper, ElsaIbáñez-Pinilla, MilcíadesTorres Quiroz, Diana Sorayalabrecque, michel2020-04-26T19:52:00Z2020-04-26T19:52:00Z20200010-7824http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengElsevierContraceptionContraception, 0010-7824, 2020https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(20)30053-6/pdfRisk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive studyRisk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive studyarticleartículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Conducta de reducción del riesgoRiesgo aceptableEstudio comparativoVasectomyLigationExcisionObjective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association.Acceso cerradohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2212020http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2THUMBNAILSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.jpgSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9afc47d3-e416-45d8-903e-2873c90a7dd8/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD53ORIGINALSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdfSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdfapplication/pdf331892https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9435fb93-4dca-4b6a-b0db-dbf8a1f4365b/downloadbe9189a3221d623612c451aca056093eMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/f3f0f5ed-fe71-4459-ae44-853698e66c0e/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.txtSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain44096https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/4a101f29-f891-4f06-a49b-7feed60adb38/downloadd47e11067e7f2d169f6b3b6d69ea5605MD5420.500.12495/2393oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/23932024-02-07 00:18:42.158restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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 |