Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study

Objective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive...

Full description

Autores:
Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana
Vargas Laverde, Jonathan
Mariño Samper, Elsa
Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades
Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya
labrecque, michel
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/2393
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001
Palabra clave:
Conducta de reducción del riesgo
Riesgo aceptable
Estudio comparativo
Vasectomy
Ligation
Excision
Rights
License
Acceso cerrado
id UNBOSQUE2_723f1d66095f3ef89eafe26fc415bed3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/2393
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
dc.title.translated.none.fl_str_mv Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
title Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
spellingShingle Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
Conducta de reducción del riesgo
Riesgo aceptable
Estudio comparativo
Vasectomy
Ligation
Excision
title_short Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
title_full Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
title_fullStr Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
title_sort Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive study
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana
Vargas Laverde, Jonathan
Mariño Samper, Elsa
Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades
Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya
labrecque, michel
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Miranda Claro, Silvia Juliana
Vargas Laverde, Jonathan
Mariño Samper, Elsa
Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades
Torres Quiroz, Diana Soraya
labrecque, michel
dc.subject.decs.spa.fl_str_mv Conducta de reducción del riesgo
Riesgo aceptable
Estudio comparativo
topic Conducta de reducción del riesgo
Riesgo aceptable
Estudio comparativo
Vasectomy
Ligation
Excision
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Vasectomy
Ligation
Excision
description Objective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-26T19:52:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-26T19:52:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0010-7824
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 0010-7824
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv Contraception, 0010-7824, 2020
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(20)30053-6/pdf
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso cerrado
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf221
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2020
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso cerrado
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf221
2020
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv Contraception
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9afc47d3-e416-45d8-903e-2873c90a7dd8/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9435fb93-4dca-4b6a-b0db-dbf8a1f4365b/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/f3f0f5ed-fe71-4459-ae44-853698e66c0e/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/4a101f29-f891-4f06-a49b-7feed60adb38/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7
be9189a3221d623612c451aca056093e
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
d47e11067e7f2d169f6b3b6d69ea5605
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1814100721098817536
spelling Miranda Claro, Silvia JulianaVargas Laverde, JonathanMariño Samper, ElsaIbáñez-Pinilla, MilcíadesTorres Quiroz, Diana Sorayalabrecque, michel2020-04-26T19:52:00Z2020-04-26T19:52:00Z20200010-7824http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2393https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengElsevierContraceptionContraception, 0010-7824, 2020https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(20)30053-6/pdfRisk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive studyRisk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: a prospective descriptive studyarticleartículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Conducta de reducción del riesgoRiesgo aceptableEstudio comparativoVasectomyLigationExcisionObjective To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association.Acceso cerradohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2212020http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2THUMBNAILSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.jpgSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5775https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9afc47d3-e416-45d8-903e-2873c90a7dd8/download7210a811635d1799e7c05fee5d259be7MD53ORIGINALSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdfSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdfapplication/pdf331892https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/9435fb93-4dca-4b6a-b0db-dbf8a1f4365b/downloadbe9189a3221d623612c451aca056093eMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/f3f0f5ed-fe71-4459-ae44-853698e66c0e/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.txtSilvia Juliana Miranda Claro. et. al_2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain44096https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/4a101f29-f891-4f06-a49b-7feed60adb38/downloadd47e11067e7f2d169f6b3b6d69ea5605MD5420.500.12495/2393oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/23932024-02-07 00:18:42.158restrictedhttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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