Risk factors for reamputation in patients with diabetic foot: A case-control study

Background: Reamputation as a complication of diabetic foot ulcers presents a high economic burden and represents a therapeutic failure. It is paramount to identify as early as possible patients in whom a minor amputation may not be the best option. The purpose of this investigation was to do a case...

Full description

Autores:
Correa Sánchez, Carlos Alberto
Vargas-Hernández, Juan Sebastián
García, Luisa Fernanda
Jaimes, Julián
Caicedo, Martha
Niño, Manuel Eduardo
Robledo Quijano, Jaime
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/11084
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/11084
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2023.05.006
Palabra clave:
Reamputación
Úlcera de pie diabético
Pie diabético
Amputación de extremidad inferior
Infección
Análisis de supervivencia
Reamputation
Diabetic foot ulcer
Diabetic foot
Lower extremity amputation
Infection
Survival analysis
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Description
Summary:Background: Reamputation as a complication of diabetic foot ulcers presents a high economic burden and represents a therapeutic failure. It is paramount to identify as early as possible patients in whom a minor amputation may not be the best option. The purpose of this investigation was to do a case-controlled study to determine risk factors associated with re-amputation in patients with DFU (diabetic foot ulcers) at two University Hospitals. Methods: Multicentric, observational, retrospective, case-control study from clinical records of 2 university hospitals. Our study included 420 patients, with 171 cases (re-amputations), and 249 controls. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis and time-to-event survival analysis to identify re-amputation risk factors. Results: Statistically significant risk factors were artery history of tobacco use (p = 0.001); male sex (p = 0.048); arterial occlusion in Doppler ultrasound (p = 0.001); percentage of stenosis in arterial ultrasound >50 % (p = 0.053); requirement of vascular intervention (p = 0.01); and microvascular involvement in photoplethysmography (p = 0.033). The most parsimonious regression model suggests that history of tobacco use, male sex, arterial occlusion in ultrasound, and percentage of stenosis in arterial ultrasound >50 % remained statistically significant. The survival analysis identified earlier amputations in patients with larger occlusion in arterial ultrasound, high leukocyte count, and elevated ESR. Conclusion: Direct and surrogate outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcers identify vascular involvement as an important risk factor for reamputation.