Neurotrauma clinicians' perspectives on the contextual challenges associated with long-term follow-up following traumatic brain injury in low-income and middle-income countries: A qualitative study protocol
Introduction Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health concern; however, low/middle-income countries (LMICs) face the greatest burden. The WHO recognises the significant differences between patient outcomes following injuries in high-income countries versus those in LMICs. Outcome data...
- Autores:
-
Smith, Brandon George
Whiffin, Charlotte Jane
Esene, Ignatius N
Karekezi, Claire
Bashford, Tom
Mukhtar Khan, Muhammad
Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
Indira Devi, Bhagavatula
Hutchinson, Peter John
Kolias, Angelos G
Figaji, Anthony
Rubiano, Andres M
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6720
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6720
http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ bmjopen- 2020- 041442
- Palabra clave:
- Salud pública
Lesión cerebral traumática (TBI)
Atención del neurotrauma
Países de ingresos bajos y medianos
Public health
Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
Neurotrauma care
Low and middle income countries
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Summary: | Introduction Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health concern; however, low/middle-income countries (LMICs) face the greatest burden. The WHO recognises the significant differences between patient outcomes following injuries in high-income countries versus those in LMICs. Outcome data are not reliably recorded in LMICs and despite improved injury surveillance data, data on disability and long-term functional outcomes remain poorly recorded. Therefore, the full picture of outcome post-TBI in LMICs is largely unknown. Methods and analysis This is a cross-sectional pragmatic qualitative study using individual semistructured interviews with clinicians who have experience of neurotrauma in LMICs. The aim of this study is to understand the contextual challenges associated with long-term follow-up of patients following TBI in LMICs. For the purpose of the study, we define ‘long-term’ as any data collected following discharge from hospital. We aim to conduct individual semistructured interviews with 24–48 neurosurgeons, beginning February 2020. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. A reflexive thematic analysis will be conducted supported by NVivo software. Ethics and dissemination The University of Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee approved this study in February 2020. Ethical issues within this study include consent, confidentiality and anonymity, and data protection. Participants will provide informed consent and their contributions will be kept confidential. Participants will be free to withdraw at any time without penalty; however, their interview data can only be withdrawn up to 1 week after data collection. Findings generated from the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders such as the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and disseminated in conference presentations and journal publications. |
---|