“Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants

Preterm infants are increasingly diagnosed as having“extrauterine growth restriction”(EUGR) or“postnatal growth failure”(PGF). Usually EUGR/PGF is diagnosed when weight is <10th percentile at either discharge or 36–40 weeks postmenstrualage. The reasons why the phrases EUGR/PGF are unhelpful incl...

Full description

Autores:
Cormack, Barbara
Goldberg, Dena L.
Nasser, Roseann
Alshaikh, Belal N.
Eliasziw, Misha
Fenton, Tanis
Hay, William W.
Hoyos, Angela
Anderson, Diane M.
Bloomfield, Frank
Griffin, Ian J.
Embleton, Nicholas
Rochow, Niels
Taylor, Sarah N.
Senterre, Thibault
Schanler, Richard J.
Elmrayed, Seham A.A.
Groh-Wargo, Sharon L.
Adamkin, David H.
Shah, Prakesh
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/2399
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/2399
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0658-5
Palabra clave:
Pronóstico
Recien nacido prematuro
Crecimiento & desarrollo
Rights
License
Acceso cerrado
Description
Summary:Preterm infants are increasingly diagnosed as having“extrauterine growth restriction”(EUGR) or“postnatal growth failure”(PGF). Usually EUGR/PGF is diagnosed when weight is <10th percentile at either discharge or 36–40 weeks postmenstrualage. The reasons why the phrases EUGR/PGF are unhelpful include, they: (i) are not predictive of adverse outcome; (ii) arebased only on weight without any consideration of head or length growth, proportionality, body composition, or geneticpotential; (iii) ignore normal postnatal weight loss; (iv) are usually assessed prior to growth slowing of the reference fetus,around 36–40 weeks, and (v) are usually based on an arbitrary statistical growth percentile cut-off. Focus on EUGR/PGFprevalence may benefit with better attention to nutrition but may also harm with nutrition delivery above infants’actualneeds. In this paper, we highlight challenges associated with such arbitrary cut-offs and opportunities for further refinementof understanding growth and nutritional needs of preterm neonates