Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to pro...

Full description

Autores:
Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio
Cabrera, Luis Felipe
Gómez, Daniel A.
Mendoza Zuchini, Andres
Pulido Segura, Jean Andre
Jiménez, Maria Carolina
Villarreal, Ricardo A.
Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4148
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392
Palabra clave:
Common bile duct stones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id UNBOSQUE2_03f43cabf426697361e19ee498ccfb50
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4148
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
spellingShingle Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
Common bile duct stones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
title_sort Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio
Cabrera, Luis Felipe
Gómez, Daniel A.
Mendoza Zuchini, Andres
Pulido Segura, Jean Andre
Jiménez, Maria Carolina
Villarreal, Ricardo A.
Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio
Cabrera, Luis Felipe
Gómez, Daniel A.
Mendoza Zuchini, Andres
Pulido Segura, Jean Andre
Jiménez, Maria Carolina
Villarreal, Ricardo A.
Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio [0000-0001-8726-5578]
Pulido Segura, Jean Andre [0000-0003-2628-696X]
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Common bile duct stones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
topic Common bile duct stones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
description Background: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to programed surgery but also emergencies and those following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Objectives and aims: Describe and compare clinical and surgical results of the laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure using a 3-port vs multiport approach. Materials and methods: We present a multicentric comparative study of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure following failed (ERCP to extract CBD stones; 104 patients were managed by three-port vs 93 multiport laparoscopic surgery in five centers of Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2017 with follow-up of 1 year. Results: A total of 197 patients were taken to laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure, 104 patients via three-port technique and 93 patients via multiport. All (100%) the patients had previously failed ERCP. The average surgical time on the three-port approach was 106 minutes vs 123 minutes on multiport. Only in the multiport technique we had an average conversion of 2%. Mean hospital stay of 2.5 days, less for the three-port approach vs multiport in 5–7 days. There was a need of reintervention in 1% of the patients who underwent three-port exploration. Conclusion: Postoperative pain, use of an additional port, complication rates, operation time, and cost of the three-port technique were similar to those of the conventional approach. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the true benefits of the three-port technique.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-28T20:59:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-28T20:59:56Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0975-1955
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 0975-1955
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv World journal of laparoscopic surgery, 0975-1955, Vol. 13, Nro. 1, 2020, p. 4-10
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://www.jossworld.com/browseLockedJournal/WJOLS/article/20011
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Acceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2020
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
2020
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv World journal of laparoscopic surgery
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a5bae49e-7bea-48af-94c9-729b6d86343d/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/ed901a65-197c-4e15-82c5-bb2f40ed95b7/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e39c5c90-f78f-476b-a305-68944f67ac65/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/fed12bfc-2ec4-4327-ba01-3432ffeaf825/download
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/b003e45c-1169-4051-8378-f87854113004/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dd025811920cdb1dae17e8f97d2cf0de
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
a5f6e8c0a4dffe4b2e24dc2b35c08ad2
d655d4eb4058a45ae13f4c576ee763fe
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1808397489142759424
spelling Pedraza Ciro, MauricioCabrera, Luis FelipeGómez, Daniel A.Mendoza Zuchini, AndresPulido Segura, Jean AndreJiménez, Maria CarolinaVillarreal, Ricardo A.Sánchez-Ussa, SebastiánPedraza Ciro, Mauricio [0000-0001-8726-5578]Pulido Segura, Jean Andre [0000-0003-2628-696X]2020-09-28T20:59:56Z2020-09-28T20:59:56Z0975-1955http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengJaypee Brothers Medical PublishersWorld journal of laparoscopic surgeryWorld journal of laparoscopic surgery, 0975-1955, Vol. 13, Nro. 1, 2020, p. 4-10https://www.jossworld.com/browseLockedJournal/WJOLS/article/20011CC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto2020Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiportLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiportArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Common bile duct stonesLaparoscopic cholecystectomyLaparoscopic common bile duct explorationBackground: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to programed surgery but also emergencies and those following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Objectives and aims: Describe and compare clinical and surgical results of the laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure using a 3-port vs multiport approach. Materials and methods: We present a multicentric comparative study of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure following failed (ERCP to extract CBD stones; 104 patients were managed by three-port vs 93 multiport laparoscopic surgery in five centers of Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2017 with follow-up of 1 year. Results: A total of 197 patients were taken to laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure, 104 patients via three-port technique and 93 patients via multiport. All (100%) the patients had previously failed ERCP. The average surgical time on the three-port approach was 106 minutes vs 123 minutes on multiport. Only in the multiport technique we had an average conversion of 2%. Mean hospital stay of 2.5 days, less for the three-port approach vs multiport in 5–7 days. There was a need of reintervention in 1% of the patients who underwent three-port exploration. Conclusion: Postoperative pain, use of an additional port, complication rates, operation time, and cost of the three-port technique were similar to those of the conventional approach. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the true benefits of the three-port technique.ORIGINALMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdfMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdfapplication/pdf3200394https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a5bae49e-7bea-48af-94c9-729b6d86343d/downloaddd025811920cdb1dae17e8f97d2cf0deMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/ed901a65-197c-4e15-82c5-bb2f40ed95b7/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e39c5c90-f78f-476b-a305-68944f67ac65/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.jpgMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg14181https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/fed12bfc-2ec4-4327-ba01-3432ffeaf825/downloada5f6e8c0a4dffe4b2e24dc2b35c08ad2MD54TEXTMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.txtMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain31459https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/b003e45c-1169-4051-8378-f87854113004/downloadd655d4eb4058a45ae13f4c576ee763feMD5520.500.12495/4148oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/41482024-02-07 07:20:50.223http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.comTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo=