Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport
Background: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to pro...
- Autores:
-
Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio
Cabrera, Luis Felipe
Gómez, Daniel A.
Mendoza Zuchini, Andres
Pulido Segura, Jean Andre
Jiménez, Maria Carolina
Villarreal, Ricardo A.
Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4148
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392
- Palabra clave:
- Common bile duct stones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- CC0 1.0 Universal
id |
UNBOSQUE2_03f43cabf426697361e19ee498ccfb50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/4148 |
network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
title |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
spellingShingle |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport Common bile duct stones Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration |
title_short |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
title_full |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
title_fullStr |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
title_sort |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiport |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio Cabrera, Luis Felipe Gómez, Daniel A. Mendoza Zuchini, Andres Pulido Segura, Jean Andre Jiménez, Maria Carolina Villarreal, Ricardo A. Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio Cabrera, Luis Felipe Gómez, Daniel A. Mendoza Zuchini, Andres Pulido Segura, Jean Andre Jiménez, Maria Carolina Villarreal, Ricardo A. Sánchez-Ussa, Sebastián |
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedraza Ciro, Mauricio [0000-0001-8726-5578] Pulido Segura, Jean Andre [0000-0003-2628-696X] |
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Common bile duct stones Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration |
topic |
Common bile duct stones Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration |
description |
Background: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to programed surgery but also emergencies and those following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Objectives and aims: Describe and compare clinical and surgical results of the laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure using a 3-port vs multiport approach. Materials and methods: We present a multicentric comparative study of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure following failed (ERCP to extract CBD stones; 104 patients were managed by three-port vs 93 multiport laparoscopic surgery in five centers of Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2017 with follow-up of 1 year. Results: A total of 197 patients were taken to laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure, 104 patients via three-port technique and 93 patients via multiport. All (100%) the patients had previously failed ERCP. The average surgical time on the three-port approach was 106 minutes vs 123 minutes on multiport. Only in the multiport technique we had an average conversion of 2%. Mean hospital stay of 2.5 days, less for the three-port approach vs multiport in 5–7 days. There was a need of reintervention in 1% of the patients who underwent three-port exploration. Conclusion: Postoperative pain, use of an additional port, complication rates, operation time, and cost of the three-port technique were similar to those of the conventional approach. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the true benefits of the three-port technique. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-28T20:59:56Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-28T20:59:56Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0975-1955 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
identifier_str_mv |
0975-1955 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148 https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
World journal of laparoscopic surgery, 0975-1955, Vol. 13, Nro. 1, 2020, p. 4-10 |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.jossworld.com/browseLockedJournal/WJOLS/article/20011 |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 2020 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
World journal of laparoscopic surgery |
institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a5bae49e-7bea-48af-94c9-729b6d86343d/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/ed901a65-197c-4e15-82c5-bb2f40ed95b7/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e39c5c90-f78f-476b-a305-68944f67ac65/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/fed12bfc-2ec4-4327-ba01-3432ffeaf825/download https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/b003e45c-1169-4051-8378-f87854113004/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
dd025811920cdb1dae17e8f97d2cf0de 42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 a5f6e8c0a4dffe4b2e24dc2b35c08ad2 d655d4eb4058a45ae13f4c576ee763fe |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
_version_ |
1828164569944555520 |
spelling |
Pedraza Ciro, MauricioCabrera, Luis FelipeGómez, Daniel A.Mendoza Zuchini, AndresPulido Segura, Jean AndreJiménez, Maria CarolinaVillarreal, Ricardo A.Sánchez-Ussa, SebastiánPedraza Ciro, Mauricio [0000-0001-8726-5578]Pulido Segura, Jean Andre [0000-0003-2628-696X]2020-09-28T20:59:56Z2020-09-28T20:59:56Z0975-1955http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/4148https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1392instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengJaypee Brothers Medical PublishersWorld journal of laparoscopic surgeryWorld journal of laparoscopic surgery, 0975-1955, Vol. 13, Nro. 1, 2020, p. 4-10https://www.jossworld.com/browseLockedJournal/WJOLS/article/20011CC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/Acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abierto2020Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiportLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration using choledochotomy and primary closure following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A multicentric comparative study using three-port vs multiportArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Common bile duct stonesLaparoscopic cholecystectomyLaparoscopic common bile duct explorationBackground: Laparoscopic surgery has changed many ways in which we as surgeons manage patients, offering better results, quicker recovery, and fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques, especially in common bile duct (CBD) surgery. Not only can laparoscopic techniques be applied to programed surgery but also emergencies and those following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Objectives and aims: Describe and compare clinical and surgical results of the laparoscopic CBD exploration with primary closure using a 3-port vs multiport approach. Materials and methods: We present a multicentric comparative study of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure following failed (ERCP to extract CBD stones; 104 patients were managed by three-port vs 93 multiport laparoscopic surgery in five centers of Bogotá, Colombia, between 2013 and 2017 with follow-up of 1 year. Results: A total of 197 patients were taken to laparoscopic gallbladder removal along with CBD exploration with primary closure, 104 patients via three-port technique and 93 patients via multiport. All (100%) the patients had previously failed ERCP. The average surgical time on the three-port approach was 106 minutes vs 123 minutes on multiport. Only in the multiport technique we had an average conversion of 2%. Mean hospital stay of 2.5 days, less for the three-port approach vs multiport in 5–7 days. There was a need of reintervention in 1% of the patients who underwent three-port exploration. Conclusion: Postoperative pain, use of an additional port, complication rates, operation time, and cost of the three-port technique were similar to those of the conventional approach. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the true benefits of the three-port technique.ORIGINALMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdfMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdfapplication/pdf3200394https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/a5bae49e-7bea-48af-94c9-729b6d86343d/downloaddd025811920cdb1dae17e8f97d2cf0deMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/ed901a65-197c-4e15-82c5-bb2f40ed95b7/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/e39c5c90-f78f-476b-a305-68944f67ac65/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.jpgMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg14181https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/fed12bfc-2ec4-4327-ba01-3432ffeaf825/downloada5f6e8c0a4dffe4b2e24dc2b35c08ad2MD54TEXTMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.txtMauricio Pedraza-Ciro_2020.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain31459https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co/bitstreams/b003e45c-1169-4051-8378-f87854113004/downloadd655d4eb4058a45ae13f4c576ee763feMD5520.500.12495/4148oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/41482024-02-07 07:20:50.223http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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 |