The residential project of low size as surmount of the urban frontier: santiago de chile in the last quarter of the century
Chile is the Latin-American country with the largest social housing production. Such production is characterized by the fact that it has been mainly constructed under the same typology through different versions: the low rise housing, resulting an urban development of quickly growth, mainly shaped b...
- Autores:
-
Bustos Peñafiel, Mónica
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2006
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/32063
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/32063
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/22143/
- Palabra clave:
- Social housing
urban development
low density housing
Vivienda social
crecimiento urbano
vivienda en baja densidad
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Summary: | Chile is the Latin-American country with the largest social housing production. Such production is characterized by the fact that it has been mainly constructed under the same typology through different versions: the low rise housing, resulting an urban development of quickly growth, mainly shaped by the massive and disperse addition of residential paths in its borders. Starting from the specific case of the metropolitan area of Santiago de Chile, this article presents a reflexive approach to this phenomenon, analyzing and showing the different “morpho-tipological” constants that have taken form in the city periphery in the latest quarter of the last century, product of the formation of the large low -cost housing surface. Mainly centered in the growth of this building typology –from a critic analysis of the phenomenon– approaches from the territorial occupation developed processes as from its massive production, evaluating its typological evolution as a prototype of the poorest groups areas as well as a resultant housing landscape as consequence of the actual relation between the building sector and the political decisions on planning and housing. |
---|