Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab
ilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas, tablas
- Autores:
-
Salas Prada, Alejandro
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/85448
- Palabra clave:
- 300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social
Trabajo en equipo
Cultura científica
Scientific culture
Colaboración
Prácticas
Co-creación
Diseño
Innovación
Etnografía
Agencia
Collaboration
Practices
Co-creation
Design
Innovation
Ethnography
Agency
Innovación científica
Scientific innovations
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_f5cfbf3ad96e6d87218800e50565b57e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/85448 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
The procedures of collaboration : An ethnography on the co-creation workshops for the making of a ClimateLab |
| title |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| spellingShingle |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab 300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social Trabajo en equipo Cultura científica Scientific culture Colaboración Prácticas Co-creación Diseño Innovación Etnografía Agencia Collaboration Practices Co-creation Design Innovation Ethnography Agency Innovación científica Scientific innovations |
| title_short |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| title_full |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| title_fullStr |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| title_sort |
Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Salas Prada, Alejandro |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Martinez Medina, Santiago |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Salas Prada, Alejandro |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicina |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social |
| topic |
300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social Trabajo en equipo Cultura científica Scientific culture Colaboración Prácticas Co-creación Diseño Innovación Etnografía Agencia Collaboration Practices Co-creation Design Innovation Ethnography Agency Innovación científica Scientific innovations |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo en equipo Cultura científica |
| dc.subject.lemb.eng.fl_str_mv |
Scientific culture |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colaboración Prácticas Co-creación Diseño Innovación Etnografía Agencia |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Collaboration Practices Co-creation Design Innovation Ethnography Agency |
| dc.subject.unesco.spa.fl_str_mv |
Innovación científica |
| dc.subject.unesco.eng.fl_str_mv |
Scientific innovations |
| description |
ilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas, tablas |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-26T13:37:04Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-26T13:37:04Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85448 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85448 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Angerer, M.-L. (2015). Desire After Affect. Rowman & Littlefield International. Baird, D. (2004). Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. University of California Press. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics And the Entanglement of Matter And Meaning. Duke University Press. Baudry, J., Tancoigne, É., & Strasser, B. J. (2022). Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211058791 Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623 Blacker, S., Kimura, A. H., & Kinchy, A. (2021). When citizen science is public relations. Social Studies of Science, 51(5), 780-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211027662 Bloor, D. (1998). Conocimiento e imaginario social. Gedisa. Botero, A. (2013). Expanding design space(s): design in communal endeavours. Aalto University. Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637 Bychkova, O. (2016). Innovation by coercion: Emerging institutionalization of university-industry collaborations in Russia. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716654768 Caccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(1), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357 Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), 347-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885 Citton, Y. (2017). The Ecology of Attention. Polity Press. Collins, H. (1997). Un Programa Empírico del Relativismo en Sociología del Conocimiento Científico. In M. Gonzáles García, J. López Cerezo, & J. Luis Luján (Eds.), Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad: Lecturas Seleccionadas. Editorial Ariel S.A. Cozza, M., Cusinato, A., & Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2020). Atmosphere in Participatory Design. Science as Culture, 29(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1681952 Dantec, C. A. Le, & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581 de la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Duke University Press. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2002). Mil Mesetas: Capitalismo y Esquizofrenia (5th ed.). Pre-textos. Delgado, A., & Callén, B. (2017). Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516647348 Delvenne, P., & Macq, H. (2020). Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments. Science as Culture, 29(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1668369 Despret, V. (2008). El cuerpo de nuestros desvelos: figuras de la antropo-zoo-génesis. In Tecnogenesis, La construccion tecnica de las ecologias humanas (pp. 229-260). AIBR (Antropologos Iberoamericanos en Red),. Despret, V. (2022). A la salud de los muertos: relatos de quienes quedan. La Oveja Roja. Díaz Valderrama, M. O. (2021). Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Escobar, A. (2016). Cosmo/visiones del Pacífico y sus implicaciones socioambientales: Elementos para un diálogo de visiones. Foros Semana, 1-17. European Network of Living Labs. (n.d.). Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://enoll.org/network/living-labs/ Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 732-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989 Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761 Fish, A. (2021). Crash Theory: Entrapments of Conservation Drones and Endangered Megafauna. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920920356 Gibbons, S. (2016, July 31). Design Thinking 101. Nielsen Norman Group. Govella, A. (2019). Collaborative product design. O'Reilly Media, Inc,. Gramaglia, C., & Mélard, F. (2019). Looking for the Cosmopolitical Fish: Monitoring Marine Pollution with Anglers and Congers in the Gulf of Fos, Southern France. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 814-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919860197 Gross, M., & Schulte-Römer, N. (2019). Remaking Participatory Democracy through Experimental Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(4), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918799172 Guber, R. (2001). La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Editorial Norma. Haraway, D. (1984). Manifiesto Ciborg: El sueño irónico de un lenguaje común para las mujeres en el circuito integrado. Universidad de Vigo. Haraway, D. (1991). Conocimientos situados: la cuestión científica en el feminismo y el privilegio de la perspectiva parcial. In Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Titivillus. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. Haraway, D. (2018). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse Feminism and Technoscience (2nd ed.). Routledge. Hayles, K. (2010). Cybernetics. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago. Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking Through Things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically (A. Henare, M. Holbraad, & S. Wastell, Eds.). Routledge. Hyysalo, S., & Johnson, M. (2016). User Representation: A Journey Towards Conceptual Maturation. In S. Hyysalo, T.-E. Jensen, & N. Oudshoorn (Eds.), The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies (Routledge, Vol. 1, pp. 75-100). Routledge. Ingold, T. (2008). Tres en uno: Cómo disolver las distinciones entre cuerpo, mente y cultura. In T. Sánchez (Ed.), Tecnogénesis: La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (p. 33). Innovation and applied research for mitigation and adaptation Climate change. (n.d.). Retrieved July 22, 2023, from https://climate-labs.org/ Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486 Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge. Kleinman, D. L., & Suryanarayanan, S. (2020). Pollinating Collaboration: Diverse Stakeholders' Efforts to Build Experiments in the Wake of the Honey Bee Crisis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(4), 686-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919865962 Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press, Ltd. Kohtala, C. (2017). Making "Making" Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. The Design Journal, 20(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504 Krzywoszynska, A., Matt, W., Buckley, A., Chiles, P., Gregson, N., Holmes, H., & Mawyin, J. (2018). Opening Up the Participation Laboratory. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 785-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917752865 Lahsen, M. (2016). Toward a Sustainable Future Earth. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(5), 876-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916639728 Latour, B. (1990). Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In S. Lynch, Michael; Woolgar (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice (MIT Press, pp. 16-68). Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (1992). Ciencia en acción: Cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros a través de la sociedad. Open University Press. Latour, B. (2004a). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943 Latour, B. (2004b). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/421123 Latour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (2005b). 'Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,'or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195175328.001.0001 Latour, B. (2016). Del Realpolitik al Dingpolitik: o de cómo hacer las cosas públicas. Acta Sociológica, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2017.06.005 Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New Jersey. Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on Materiality and Sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.x Madeleine, A. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press. Martínez Medina, S., & Hernández-Manrique, O. L. (2020). Colecta como captura recíproca múltiple: etnógrafos, científicos y especímenes en clave cosmopolítica. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.640 Martínez-Medina, S. (2022). Knowledge Practices. In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2516 Matias, N. (2011). Co-design in a historical context. MIT Civic Media. Medinilla, Á. (2012). Agile Management: Leadership in an Agile Environment. Springer. Meehan, K., Klenk, N. L., & Mendez, F. (2018). The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 759-784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917745601 Millner, N. (2020). As the drone flies: Configuring a vertical politics of contestation within forest conservation. Political Geography, 80, 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102163 Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2017). Embodied action, enacted bodies. the example of hypoglycaemia. In Logos (Russian Federation) (Vol. 27, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-233-259 Montes Cruz, J. J. (2020). Traducir lo material?: el codiseño entre diseñadores industriales y tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Montes, J. J. (2022). Pensando con otros: las figuraciones como herramientas para describir la multiplicidad. Maguaré, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v36n1.100873 Múnera, L. (2005). Poder: trayectorias teóricas de un concepto. Colombia Internacional, 62(Jul-Dic 2005), 32-49. Nascimento, S., Pólvora, A., Paio, A., Oliveira, S., Rato, V., Oliveira, M. J., Varela, B., & Sousa, J. P. (2016). Sustainable Technologies and Transdisciplinary Futures: From Collaborative Design to Digital Fabrication. Science as Culture, 25(4), 520-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1193131 Nayak, P. R., & Ketteringham, J. (2003). 3M's Post-it Notes: A Managed or Accidental Innovation? . In R. Katz (Ed.), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Norman, D. A. (1994). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Osorio, F. (2021). Management of innovation labs: an enabling methodological approach for strategic intent design. Université de Lorraine; Universidad nacional de Colombia. Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301 Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. The MIT Press. Pérez-Bustos, T. (2021). Gestos textiles: Un Acercamiento Material a las Etnografías, los Cuerpos y los Tiempos. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Pérez-Bustos, T., Martinez Medina, S., & Mora-Gámez, F. (2018). What is "(un)making" STS ethnographies? Reflections (not exclusively) from Latin America. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1551825 Pérez-Bustos, Tania; Márquez, S. D. (2016). Destejiendo puntos de vista feministas: reflexiones metodológicas desde la etnografía del diseño de una tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 11(31). http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132016000100008&lang=es Pfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017). Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 783-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110 Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press. Ross, P. (2011). Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science, 41(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710385851 Savolainen, K., & Hyysalo, S. (2021). User Representations as a Design Resource. Science & Technology Studies, 34(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.84598 Schick, L., & Winthereik, B. R. (2016). Making Energy Infrastructure: Tactical Oscillations and Cosmopolitics. Science as Culture, 25(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1093731 Schrevel, S., Slager, M., & de Vlugt, E. (2020). "I Stood By and Watched": An Autoethnography of Stakeholder Participation in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1400 Seitz, T. (2020). Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31715-7 Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press. Spencer, M., Dányi, E., & Hayashi, Y. (2019). Asymmetries and Climate Futures: Working with Waters in an Indigenous Australian Settlement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 786-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919852667 Star, S. L. (1993). Cooperation Without Consensus in Scientific Problem Solving: Dynamics of Oosure in Open Systems. In CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict? (pp. 93-106). Springer-Verlag. Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3). Stengers, I. (1997). La guerre des sciences: Cosmopolitiques 1 (Vol. 1). La Découverte. Stiegler, B. (2010). Memory. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (p. 353). Chicago Press. Strathern, M. (1999). Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. The Athlone Press. Suchman, L. (2005). Affiliative Objects. Organization, 12(3), 379-399. Suchman, L. (2011). Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640 Suchman, L. (2012). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press. Thacker, E. (2010). Biomedia. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press. Tsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruin. Princeton University Press. van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users' Femininity and Masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies (The MIT Press, pp. 193-209). The MIT Press. Voß, J.-P., & Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716641350 Watzl, S. (2017). Structuring Mind: The Nature of Attention and How it Shapes Consciousness. Oxford University Press. Wilf, E. (2016). The Post-it Note Economy: Understanding Post-Fordist Business Innovation through One of Its Key Semiotic Technologies. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 732-760. https://doi.org/10.1086/688952 Wilkie, A. (2011). Régimenes de diseño, lógicas de usuarios. Athenea Digital, 11(1), 317-334. Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1). Winthrop-Young, G. (2010). Hardware / Software / Wetware. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press. Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 58-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x Zenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 845-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12459 Zilliox, S., & Smith, J. M. (2018). Colorado's Fracking Debates: Citizen Science, Conflict and Collaboration. Science as Culture, 27(2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1425384 |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados al autor, 2023 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados al autor, 2023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
146 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/2/1018481330.2024.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/3/1018481330.2024.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a 7580c6c4802d1b80914f8a5ebf2dc422 f8275850b9e8e102ec977c968092b338 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814089532429041664 |
| spelling |
Reconocimiento 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados al autor, 2023http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Martinez Medina, Santiago7dd81a070430bb730b6058cc0e52225eSalas Prada, Alejandro48cb0926c164096814292f6b28bb917eEstudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicina2024-01-26T13:37:04Z2024-01-26T13:37:04Z2023https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85448Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas, tablasLos talleres de co-creación se ha difundido en cada vez más diversos espacios: la innovación empresarial, las políticas públicas, la investigación académica. Emergiendo como una manera de pensar los encuentros colaborativos cuidadosamente preparada. Esta es una investigación etnográfica sobre la colaboración, sobre las prácticas de co-creación en proyectos de innovación y diseño. Llevé a cabo trabajo de campo en la serie de sesiones de trabajo en las que la universidad A en Pereira, Colombia desarrollo las actividades propuestas por la universidad B en Nancy, Francia destinadas a hacer un laboratorio de innovación social enfocado en cambio climático en la universidad latinoamericana. En esta investigación exploro las agencias múltiples que hacen el encuentro, en las sesiones, además de personas, las actividades y cosas como los tableros, las notas adhesivas y el software hacen parte la práctica colaborativa. Los procedimientos de co-creación configuran las relaciones de poder, la práctica de la escucha y la realización de los acuerdos. También argumento que el poder y la escucha no son excluyentes en un ejercicio de participación, los procedimientos de co-creación organizan los tiempos de la palabra, los turnos, las interrupciones, las preguntas y los procedimientos con los que se decide. Así mismo, muestro cómo la práctica genera acuerdos y desacuerdos en esta toma de decisiones; reconociendo la parcialidad como una condición de los acuerdos en el ejercicio de la colaboración. (Texto tomado de la fuente)The co-creation workshops have widespread across every time more diverse spaces: business innovation, public policy, academic research. Emerging as a way to think collaborative encounters carefully prepared. This is ethnographic research about collaboration, about practices of co-creation in innovation and design practices. I conducted field work in the series of working sessions in which university A in Pereira, Colombia developed the activities proposed by university B in Nancy, France aimed at making a social innovation laboratory focused on climate change in the Latin American university. In this research I explore the multiple agencies that make the encounter, in the sessions, in addition to people, activities and things such as boards, sticky notes and software are part of the collaborative practice. Co-creation procedures shape power relations, the practice of listening, and the making of agreements. I also argue that power and listening are not mutually exclusive in a participatory exercise; co-creation procedures organize speaking times, turns, interruptions, questions and decision-making procedures. Likewise, I show how the practice generates agreements and disagreements in this decision making; recognizing partiality as a condition of agreements in the exercise of collaboration.MaestríaMagíster en Estudios Sociales de La CienciaEsta es una investigación etnográfica sobre la colaboración, sobre las prácticas de co-creación en proyectos de innovación y diseño.146 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la CienciaFacultad de Ciencias HumanasBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción socialTrabajo en equipoCultura científicaScientific cultureColaboraciónPrácticasCo-creaciónDiseñoInnovaciónEtnografíaAgenciaCollaborationPracticesCo-creationDesignInnovationEthnographyAgencyInnovación científicaScientific innovationsLos procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLabThe procedures of collaboration : An ethnography on the co-creation workshops for the making of a ClimateLabTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMAngerer, M.-L. (2015). Desire After Affect. Rowman & Littlefield International.Baird, D. (2004). Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. University of California Press.Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics And the Entanglement of Matter And Meaning. Duke University Press.Baudry, J., Tancoigne, É., & Strasser, B. J. (2022). Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211058791Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623Blacker, S., Kimura, A. H., & Kinchy, A. (2021). When citizen science is public relations. Social Studies of Science, 51(5), 780-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211027662Bloor, D. (1998). Conocimiento e imaginario social. Gedisa.Botero, A. (2013). Expanding design space(s): design in communal endeavours. Aalto University.Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness.Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637Bychkova, O. (2016). Innovation by coercion: Emerging institutionalization of university-industry collaborations in Russia. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716654768Caccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(1), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), 347-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885Citton, Y. (2017). The Ecology of Attention. Polity Press.Collins, H. (1997). Un Programa Empírico del Relativismo en Sociología del Conocimiento Científico. In M. Gonzáles García, J. López Cerezo, & J. Luis Luján (Eds.), Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad: Lecturas Seleccionadas. Editorial Ariel S.A.Cozza, M., Cusinato, A., & Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2020). Atmosphere in Participatory Design. Science as Culture, 29(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1681952Dantec, C. A. Le, & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581de la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Duke University Press.Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2002). Mil Mesetas: Capitalismo y Esquizofrenia (5th ed.). Pre-textos.Delgado, A., & Callén, B. (2017). Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516647348Delvenne, P., & Macq, H. (2020). Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments. Science as Culture, 29(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1668369Despret, V. (2008). El cuerpo de nuestros desvelos: figuras de la antropo-zoo-génesis. In Tecnogenesis, La construccion tecnica de las ecologias humanas (pp. 229-260). AIBR (Antropologos Iberoamericanos en Red),.Despret, V. (2022). A la salud de los muertos: relatos de quienes quedan. La Oveja Roja.Díaz Valderrama, M. O. (2021). Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Escobar, A. (2016). Cosmo/visiones del Pacífico y sus implicaciones socioambientales: Elementos para un diálogo de visiones. Foros Semana, 1-17.European Network of Living Labs. (n.d.). Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://enoll.org/network/living-labs/Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 732-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761Fish, A. (2021). Crash Theory: Entrapments of Conservation Drones and Endangered Megafauna. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920920356Gibbons, S. (2016, July 31). Design Thinking 101. Nielsen Norman Group.Govella, A. (2019). Collaborative product design. O'Reilly Media, Inc,.Gramaglia, C., & Mélard, F. (2019). Looking for the Cosmopolitical Fish: Monitoring Marine Pollution with Anglers and Congers in the Gulf of Fos, Southern France. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 814-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919860197Gross, M., & Schulte-Römer, N. (2019). Remaking Participatory Democracy through Experimental Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(4), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918799172Guber, R. (2001). La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Editorial Norma.Haraway, D. (1984). Manifiesto Ciborg: El sueño irónico de un lenguaje común para las mujeres en el circuito integrado. Universidad de Vigo.Haraway, D. (1991). Conocimientos situados: la cuestión científica en el feminismo y el privilegio de la perspectiva parcial. In Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Titivillus.Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.Haraway, D. (2018). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse Feminism and Technoscience (2nd ed.). Routledge.Hayles, K. (2010). Cybernetics. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago.Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking Through Things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically (A. Henare, M. Holbraad, & S. Wastell, Eds.). Routledge.Hyysalo, S., & Johnson, M. (2016). User Representation: A Journey Towards Conceptual Maturation. In S. Hyysalo, T.-E. Jensen, & N. Oudshoorn (Eds.), The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies (Routledge, Vol. 1, pp. 75-100). Routledge.Ingold, T. (2008). Tres en uno: Cómo disolver las distinciones entre cuerpo, mente y cultura. In T. Sánchez (Ed.), Tecnogénesis: La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (p. 33).Innovation and applied research for mitigation and adaptation Climate change. (n.d.). Retrieved July 22, 2023, from https://climate-labs.org/Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.Kleinman, D. L., & Suryanarayanan, S. (2020). Pollinating Collaboration: Diverse Stakeholders' Efforts to Build Experiments in the Wake of the Honey Bee Crisis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(4), 686-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919865962Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press, Ltd.Kohtala, C. (2017). Making "Making" Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. The Design Journal, 20(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504Krzywoszynska, A., Matt, W., Buckley, A., Chiles, P., Gregson, N., Holmes, H., & Mawyin, J. (2018). Opening Up the Participation Laboratory. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 785-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917752865Lahsen, M. (2016). Toward a Sustainable Future Earth. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(5), 876-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916639728Latour, B. (1990). Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In S. Lynch, Michael; Woolgar (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice (MIT Press, pp. 16-68).Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.Latour, B. (1992). Ciencia en acción: Cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros a través de la sociedad. Open University Press.Latour, B. (2004a). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943Latour, B. (2004b). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/421123Latour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.Latour, B. (2005b). 'Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,'or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195175328.001.0001Latour, B. (2016). Del Realpolitik al Dingpolitik: o de cómo hacer las cosas públicas. Acta Sociológica, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2017.06.005Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New Jersey.Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on Materiality and Sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.xMadeleine, A. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press.Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press.Martínez Medina, S., & Hernández-Manrique, O. L. (2020). Colecta como captura recíproca múltiple: etnógrafos, científicos y especímenes en clave cosmopolítica. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.640Martínez-Medina, S. (2022). Knowledge Practices. In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2516Matias, N. (2011). Co-design in a historical context. MIT Civic Media.Medinilla, Á. (2012). Agile Management: Leadership in an Agile Environment. Springer.Meehan, K., Klenk, N. L., & Mendez, F. (2018). The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 759-784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917745601Millner, N. (2020). As the drone flies: Configuring a vertical politics of contestation within forest conservation. Political Geography, 80, 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102163Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press.Mol, A., & Law, J. (2017). Embodied action, enacted bodies. the example of hypoglycaemia. In Logos (Russian Federation) (Vol. 27, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-233-259Montes Cruz, J. J. (2020). Traducir lo material?: el codiseño entre diseñadores industriales y tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Montes, J. J. (2022). Pensando con otros: las figuraciones como herramientas para describir la multiplicidad. Maguaré, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v36n1.100873Múnera, L. (2005). Poder: trayectorias teóricas de un concepto. Colombia Internacional, 62(Jul-Dic 2005), 32-49.Nascimento, S., Pólvora, A., Paio, A., Oliveira, S., Rato, V., Oliveira, M. J., Varela, B., & Sousa, J. P. (2016). Sustainable Technologies and Transdisciplinary Futures: From Collaborative Design to Digital Fabrication. Science as Culture, 25(4), 520-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1193131Nayak, P. R., & Ketteringham, J. (2003). 3M's Post-it Notes: A Managed or Accidental Innovation? . In R. Katz (Ed.), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Norman, D. A. (1994). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Osorio, F. (2021). Management of innovation labs: an enabling methodological approach for strategic intent design. Université de Lorraine; Universidad nacional de Colombia.Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. The MIT Press.Pérez-Bustos, T. (2021). Gestos textiles: Un Acercamiento Material a las Etnografías, los Cuerpos y los Tiempos. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Pérez-Bustos, T., Martinez Medina, S., & Mora-Gámez, F. (2018). What is "(un)making" STS ethnographies? Reflections (not exclusively) from Latin America. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1551825Pérez-Bustos, Tania; Márquez, S. D. (2016). Destejiendo puntos de vista feministas: reflexiones metodológicas desde la etnografía del diseño de una tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 11(31). http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132016000100008&lang=esPfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017). Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 783-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.Ross, P. (2011). Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science, 41(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710385851Savolainen, K., & Hyysalo, S. (2021). User Representations as a Design Resource. Science & Technology Studies, 34(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.84598Schick, L., & Winthereik, B. R. (2016). Making Energy Infrastructure: Tactical Oscillations and Cosmopolitics. Science as Culture, 25(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1093731Schrevel, S., Slager, M., & de Vlugt, E. (2020). "I Stood By and Watched": An Autoethnography of Stakeholder Participation in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1400Seitz, T. (2020). Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31715-7Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.Spencer, M., Dányi, E., & Hayashi, Y. (2019). Asymmetries and Climate Futures: Working with Waters in an Indigenous Australian Settlement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 786-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919852667Star, S. L. (1993). Cooperation Without Consensus in Scientific Problem Solving: Dynamics of Oosure in Open Systems. In CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict? (pp. 93-106). Springer-Verlag.Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391.Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3).Stengers, I. (1997). La guerre des sciences: Cosmopolitiques 1 (Vol. 1). La Découverte.Stiegler, B. (2010). Memory. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (p. 353). Chicago Press.Strathern, M. (1999). Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. The Athlone Press.Suchman, L. (2005). Affiliative Objects. Organization, 12(3), 379-399.Suchman, L. (2011). Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640Suchman, L. (2012). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.Thacker, E. (2010). Biomedia. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press.Tsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruin. Princeton University Press.van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users' Femininity and Masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies (The MIT Press, pp. 193-209). The MIT Press.Voß, J.-P., & Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716641350Watzl, S. (2017). Structuring Mind: The Nature of Attention and How it Shapes Consciousness. Oxford University Press.Wilf, E. (2016). The Post-it Note Economy: Understanding Post-Fordist Business Innovation through One of Its Key Semiotic Technologies. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 732-760. https://doi.org/10.1086/688952Wilkie, A. (2011). Régimenes de diseño, lógicas de usuarios. Athenea Digital, 11(1), 317-334.Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1).Winthrop-Young, G. (2010). Hardware / Software / Wetware. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press.Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 58-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.xZenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 845-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12459Zilliox, S., & Smith, J. M. (2018). Colorado's Fracking Debates: Citizen Science, Conflict and Collaboration. Science as Culture, 27(2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1425384EstudiantesGrupos comunitariosInvestigadoresMaestrosPúblico generalResponsables políticosLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51ORIGINAL1018481330.2024.pdf1018481330.2024.pdfTesis de Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Cienciaapplication/pdf1942586https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/2/1018481330.2024.pdf7580c6c4802d1b80914f8a5ebf2dc422MD52THUMBNAIL1018481330.2024.pdf.jpg1018481330.2024.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4788https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85448/3/1018481330.2024.pdf.jpgf8275850b9e8e102ec977c968092b338MD53unal/85448oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/854482024-01-26 23:04:07.208Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |