Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas

ilustraciones, tablas

Autores:: Percy Guzmán, Henry Armando

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Repositorio:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	UNACIONAL2_ece8a05854f81996fbc2bb9ae7cb113e
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/79788
network_acronym_str	UNACIONAL2
network_name_str	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Sustainable suppliers development and evaluation effects under formal and informal governance mechanisms on triple bottom line performance in hybrid organizations
title	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
spellingShingle	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines Desarrollo sostenible Sustainable development Desarrollo de proveedores Mecanismos de gobernanza Desempeño del triple bottom line Organizaciones híbridas B-CORPS Supplier development Governance mechanisms Triple Bottom Line performance Hybrid organizations B-Corps
title_short	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
title_full	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
title_fullStr	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
title_full_unstemmed	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
title_sort	Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Percy Guzmán, Henry Armando
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Moreno Mantilla, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Percy Guzmán, Henry Armando
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv	620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines
topic	620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines Desarrollo sostenible Sustainable development Desarrollo de proveedores Mecanismos de gobernanza Desempeño del triple bottom line Organizaciones híbridas B-CORPS Supplier development Governance mechanisms Triple Bottom Line performance Hybrid organizations B-Corps
dc.subject.lemb.none.fl_str_mv	Desarrollo sostenible Sustainable development
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Desarrollo de proveedores Mecanismos de gobernanza Desempeño del triple bottom line Organizaciones híbridas
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	B-CORPS Supplier development Governance mechanisms Triple Bottom Line performance Hybrid organizations B-Corps
description	ilustraciones, tablas
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-08T22:19:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-08T22:19:44Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79788
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79788 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2016). Triple bottom line performance evaluation of reverse logistics. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2015-0029 Appolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green Procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85(December 2017), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.106 Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022 Arnold, M. (2017). Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.059 ATLAS.ti. (2012). ATLAS.ti 7 - Guía Rápida. Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2018). Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: The relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124473 Bastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2019). Integrated quality and supply chain management business diagnostics for organizational sustainability improvement. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.001 bcorporation.net. (n.d.). The Complete Guide to B Corp Certification for Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises Join the Global Movement of People Using Business as a Force for Good. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 Burki, U., Ersoy, P., & Dahlstrom, R. (2018). Achieving triple bottom line performance in manufacturer-customer supply chains: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.236 Bustos Báez, S., & Wastavino Muñoz, F. (2016). ¿De qué manera las Empresas B generan impactos positivos en el ámbito social y medioambiental? Gestión de Las Personas y Tecnología, 9(27), 21–33. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 Cho, M. (2017). Benefit corporations in the United States and community interest companies in the United Kingdom: Does social enterprise actually work? Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 37(1), 149–172. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (sage (Ed.); 4th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England. Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006 Das, D. (2018). The impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices on firm performance: Lessons from Indian organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.250 de Lange, D. E. (2017). Start-up sustainability: An insurmountable cost or a life-giving investment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.108 Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046 Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013 Formentini, M., & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.072 França, C. L., Broman, G., Robèrt, K. H., Basile, G., & Trygg, L. (2017). An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.124 Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13. Gerring, J. (2016). Case Study Research Principles and Practices, 2d ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education, 000(January), 1–197. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n58 Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1458-4 Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591 Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006 Hart, S. L. (1995). Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy OfManagement Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n472 Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw Hil Education. Hiller, J. S. (2013). The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3 Hlavka, E. (2017). Increasing Equity through B Corp Certification in the Coffee Commodity Supply Chain. Capstone Collection. http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/3006 Huo, B., Gu, M., & Wang, Z. (2019). Green or lean? A supply chain approach to sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.141 Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248 Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067 Khan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Arhin, F. K., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2018). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: A framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.144 Kim, S., Karlesky, M., Christopher, M., & Schifeling, T. (2016). Why Companies Are Becoming B Corporations. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/06/why-companies-are-becoming-b-corporations Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 Koberg, E., & Longoni, A. (2019). A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1084–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033 Laubscher, M., & Marinelli, T. (2014). Integration of Circular Economy in Business. Going Green - Care Innovation 2014, November, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4864.4164 Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9 Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043 Lo, S. M., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2018). The impact of relationship quality and supplier development on green supply chain integration: A mediation and moderation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.175 Loewenstein, B. M. J. (2013). Benefit Corporations : A Challenge in Corporate Governance. The Business Lawyer, 68(4), 1007–1038. Long, T. B., Looijen, A., & Blok, V. (2018). Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.067 Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., & Breuer, H. (2018). The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004 Lüdeke-Freund, F., Freudenreich, B., Saviuc, I., Schaltegger, S., & Stock, M. (2017). Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A Conceptual Foundation A Review and Synthesis of Research and Practice on Sustainable Business Models View project Sustainability cohort View project "Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A C. Analytics, Innovation, and Excellence-Driven Enterprise Sustainability, 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37879-8_7 Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from india. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.003 Manning, L., & Soon, J. M. (2016). Development of sustainability indicator scoring (SIS) for the food supply chain. British Food Journal, 118(9), 2097–2125. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0007 Mariele, F., Roth, S., & Winkler, I. (2018). B CORP ENTREPRENEURS Analysing the motivations and Values behind Running a Social Business (p. 113). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Mathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003 Miemczyk, J., & Luzzini, D. (2019). Achieving triple bottom line sustainability in supply chains: The role of environmental, social and risk assessment practices. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39(2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2017-0334 Muñoz, P., Cacciotti, G., & Cohen, B. (2018). The double-edged sword of purpose-driven behavior in sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005 Neutzling, D. M., Land, A., Seuring, S., & Nascimento, L. F. M. do. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3448–3458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.091 Ni, W., & Sun, H. (2018). A contingent perspective on the synergistic effect of governance mechanisms on sustainable supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 23(3), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2017-0260 Panigrahi, S. S., Bahinipati, B., & Jain, V. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management: A review of literature and implications for future research. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), 1001–1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003 Peters, G.-J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity. The European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69. Preguntas Frecuentes \| Evaluación B. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://bimpactassessment.net/how-it-works/frequently-asked-questions/theverification-process#dónde-puedo-ver-cuántos-puntos-vale-cada-pregunta Rajindra, R., Burhanuddin, B., Rukhayati, & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Sustainable supply chain governance mechanisms: Strategic approaches to corporate sustainability. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 232–240. Rashidi, K., & Saen, R. F. (2018). Incorporating dynamic concept into gradual efficiency: Improving suppliers in sustainable supplier development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.092 Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Going one’s own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.104 Reficco, E., Gutiérrez, R., Jaén, M. H., & Auletta, N. (2018). Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.043 Ronzani, C. M., Da Costa, P. R., Da Silva, L. F., Pigola, A., & De Paiva, E. M. (2020). Qualitative methods of analysis: an example of Atlas.TITM Software usage. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20(4), 284–311. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i4.1994 RUES - Registro Unico Empresarial. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://www.rues.org.co/ Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007 Schulz, S. A., & Flanigan, R. L. (2016). Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2014-0150 Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business. In Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084 Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 Siqueira, R. P., & Pitassi, C. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovations: Can mindfulness make a difference? Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.056 Sistema B Colombia. (n.d.). Quiénes Somos. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://sistemab.org/quienes-somos-4/ Sistema B Colombia. (2020). ¡Febrero en Sistema B! Lanzamiento oficial del SDG Action Manager + Carta anual del presidente del fondo de inversión más grande del mundo -. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#search/melisa%40sistemab.org/FMfcgxwGDDqlwJWRhrkrWsBMdltqBmZC Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003 Stubbs, W. (2017a). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1920 Stubbs, W. (2017b). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.093 Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model.” Organization and Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042 Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 Tachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The Performance of Green Supply Chain Management Governance Mechanisms: A Supply Network and Complexity Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12072 Van Der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–19. Vurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(SUPPL. 4), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x Walker, D. H. T., Bourne, L. M., & Shelley, A. (2008). Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390 Walker, H., Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T., & Spencer, R. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.11.003 Wang, J., & Ran, B. (2018). Sustainable Collaborative Governance in supply chain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010171 Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2014). The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit. Business Horizons, 57(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.10.001 Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2015). Evaluating CSR accomplishments of founding certified B Corps. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-07-2015-0010 Yadlapalli, A., Rahman, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 196(April 2017), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.016 Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (Sage (Ed.); 5th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England. Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005 Yu, Y., & Huo, B. (2019). The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: The moderating role of relational capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.198 Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005 YURDUGÜL, H. (2008). MINIMUM SAMPLE SIZE FOR CRONBACH’S COEFFICIENT ALPHA: A MONTE CARLO STUDY CRONBACH ALFA KATSAYISI ÎÇÎN MÍNÍMUM ÖRNEKLEM GENÍ§LÍOl: MONTE-CARLO ÇALIÇMASI. 1999, 397–406. Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A. M., & Talib Bon, A. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.062 Zhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.015
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Derechos reservados al autor, 2021
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados al autor, 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	187 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrial
dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv	Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
institution	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/2/1032379410.2021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/3/1032379410.2021.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	cccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6 133aebacbb664d8f204f08efd331c23e 45ba81e89094dba0601bbd086706bf58
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_	1814089847704387584
spelling	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados al autor, 2021http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Moreno Mantilla, Carlos Eduardo7588fc08f64bd7683a1a90c30a6ac59ePercy Guzmán, Henry Armando176a212707423b0221cd8179717cf9cc2021-07-08T22:19:44Z2021-07-08T22:19:44Z2021https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79788Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, tablasLa investigación en la administración de cadenas de suministro sostenibles se ha enfocado principalmente en las prácticas ambientales de las organizaciones, sin tener en cuenta las tres dimensiones de la sostenibilidad como un conjunto (ambiental, social y económica). Típicamente, el desempeño que considera las tres dimensiones de la sostenibilidad se ha relacionado como la triple cuenta de resultados, o Triple Bottom Line (TBL). Existe un grupo de organizaciones, conocidas como organizaciones híbridas, que estructuran su modelo de negocio desde la sostenibilidad y no se enfocan exclusivamente en el cumplimiento de metas económicas. Para este tipo de organizaciones, dentro de la cadena de suministro, los proveedores pueden tener un efecto importante sobre el cumplimiento de las metas sostenibles establecidas. Dentro del segmento de organizaciones híbridas, existe un grupo denominado B-CORP que cuentan con una certificación que avala sus esfuerzos orientados hacia la sostenibilidad. El objetivo de esta investigación es evaluar los efectos que tiene el desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles sobre el desempeño del TBL, con particular atención al efecto moderador del contexto sobre esta relación. Por medio de un diseño de investigación mixto que inicia con una fase cuantitativa, se seleccionaron 5 organizaciones híbridas a partir de una base de más de 60 organizaciones certificadas como B-CORP con operaciones en Colombia. Posteriormente, se desarrolló una fase cualitativa a través de una serie de entrevistas abiertas con el fin de evaluar las prácticas de desarrollo sostenible hacia sus proveedores, bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales, y su efecto sobre el desempeño del Triple Bottom Line (TBL). Como resultado de este estudio se propone un modelo conceptual que ayuda a entender cómo se relacionan los mecanismos de gobernanza con el desempeño del TBL, confirmando empíricamente una serie de proposiciones derivadas de la literatura. Los resultados del estudio validan los efectos positivos que tienen los mecanismos de manera directa sobre los componentes ambientales y sociales del TBL y de forma indirecta sobre el componente económico. Adicionalmente, se identificaron mecanismos causales específicos que intervienen en estas relaciones, tales como normas y guías de control, alineación sostenible, colaboración/fraternidad/confianza, poder de selección, y fortalecimiento-empoderamiento.Research in sustainable supply chain management has focused primarily on the environmental practices of organizations, without considering the three dimensions of sustainability (environmental, social, and economic). Typically, performance that considers the three dimensions of sustainability has been related as Triple Bottom Line (TBL). There is a group of organizations, known as hybrid organizations, that structure their business model from sustainability and do not focus exclusively on reaching its economic goals. For these types of organizations, within the supply chain, suppliers can have an important effect on the fulfillment of the established sustainable goals. Within the hybrid organization segment, there is a group called B-CORP that have a certification that endorses their oriented towards sustainability efforts. The research objective is to evaluate the effects of development and evaluation of sustainable suppliers have on the performance of the TBL, with particular attention to the moderating effect of the context on this relationship. Through a mixed research design, begins with a quantitative phase, 5 hybrid organizations were selected from a base of more than 60 organizations certified as B-CORP with operations in Colombia. Subsequently, a qualitative phase was developed through a series of open interviews to evaluate sustainable development practices towards their suppliers, under formal and informal governance mechanisms, and their effect on the performance of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL). As a result of this study, a conceptual model is proposed that helps to understand how governance mechanisms are related to TBL performance, empirically confirming a series of propositions derived from the literature. The results of the study validate the positive effects that the mechanisms have directly on the environmental and social components of the TBL and indirectly on the economic component. Additionally, specific causal mechanisms that intervene in these relationships were identified, such as control norms and guidelines, sustainable alignment, collaboration / fraternity / trust, selection power, and strengthening-empowerment.MaestríaMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialingeniería de la productividad187 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería IndustrialDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e IndustrialFacultad de IngenieríaBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afinesDesarrollo sostenibleSustainable developmentDesarrollo de proveedoresMecanismos de gobernanzaDesempeño del triple bottom lineOrganizaciones híbridasB-CORPSSupplier developmentGovernance mechanismsTriple Bottom Line performanceHybrid organizationsB-CorpsEfecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridasSustainable suppliers development and evaluation effects under formal and informal governance mechanisms on triple bottom line performance in hybrid organizationsTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMAgrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2016). Triple bottom line performance evaluation of reverse logistics. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2015-0029Appolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green Procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85(December 2017), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.106Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022Arnold, M. (2017). Fostering sustainability by linking co-creation and relationship management concepts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.059ATLAS.ti. (2012). ATLAS.ti 7 - Guía Rápida.Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2018). Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: The relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124473Bastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2019). Integrated quality and supply chain management business diagnostics for organizational sustainability improvement. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.001bcorporation.net. (n.d.). The Complete Guide to B Corp Certification for Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises Join the Global Movement of People Using Business as a Force for Good.Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007Burki, U., Ersoy, P., & Dahlstrom, R. (2018). Achieving triple bottom line performance in manufacturer-customer supply chains: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.236Bustos Báez, S., & Wastavino Muñoz, F. (2016). ¿De qué manera las Empresas B generan impactos positivos en el ámbito social y medioambiental? Gestión de Las Personas y Tecnología, 9(27), 21–33.Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010Cho, M. (2017). Benefit corporations in the United States and community interest companies in the United Kingdom: Does social enterprise actually work? Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 37(1), 149–172.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (sage (Ed.); 4th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006Das, D. (2018). The impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices on firm performance: Lessons from Indian organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.250de Lange, D. E. (2017). Start-up sustainability: An insurmountable cost or a life-giving investment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.108Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013Formentini, M., & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.072França, C. L., Broman, G., Robèrt, K. H., Basile, G., & Trygg, L. (2017). An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.124Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.Gerring, J. (2016). Case Study Research Principles and Practices, 2d ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education, 000(January), 1–197. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n58Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1458-4Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006Hart, S. L. (1995). Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy OfManagement Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n472Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw Hil Education.Hiller, J. S. (2013). The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3Hlavka, E. (2017). Increasing Equity through B Corp Certification in the Coffee Commodity Supply Chain. Capstone Collection. http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/3006Huo, B., Gu, M., & Wang, Z. (2019). Green or lean? A supply chain approach to sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.141Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067Khan, S. A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Arhin, F. K., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2018). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: A framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.144Kim, S., Karlesky, M., Christopher, M., & Schifeling, T. (2016). Why Companies Are Becoming B Corporations. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/06/why-companies-are-becoming-b-corporationsKlewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017Koberg, E., & Longoni, A. (2019). A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1084–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033Laubscher, M., & Marinelli, T. (2014). Integration of Circular Economy in Business. Going Green - Care Innovation 2014, November, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4864.4164Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043Lo, S. M., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2018). The impact of relationship quality and supplier development on green supply chain integration: A mediation and moderation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.175Loewenstein, B. M. J. (2013). Benefit Corporations : A Challenge in Corporate Governance. The Business Lawyer, 68(4), 1007–1038.Long, T. B., Looijen, A., & Blok, V. (2018). Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.067Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., & Breuer, H. (2018). The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy—45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004Lüdeke-Freund, F., Freudenreich, B., Saviuc, I., Schaltegger, S., & Stock, M. (2017). Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A Conceptual Foundation A Review and Synthesis of Research and Practice on Sustainable Business Models View project Sustainability cohort View project "Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment-A C. Analytics, Innovation, and Excellence-Driven Enterprise Sustainability, 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37879-8_7Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from india. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.003Manning, L., & Soon, J. M. (2016). Development of sustainability indicator scoring (SIS) for the food supply chain. British Food Journal, 118(9), 2097–2125. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0007Mariele, F., Roth, S., & Winkler, I. (2018). B CORP ENTREPRENEURS Analysing the motivations and Values behind Running a Social Business (p. 113). Palgrave Macmillan UK.Mathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003Miemczyk, J., & Luzzini, D. (2019). Achieving triple bottom line sustainability in supply chains: The role of environmental, social and risk assessment practices. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39(2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2017-0334Muñoz, P., Cacciotti, G., & Cohen, B. (2018). The double-edged sword of purpose-driven behavior in sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005Neutzling, D. M., Land, A., Seuring, S., & Nascimento, L. F. M. do. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3448–3458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.091Ni, W., & Sun, H. (2018). A contingent perspective on the synergistic effect of governance mechanisms on sustainable supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 23(3), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2017-0260Panigrahi, S. S., Bahinipati, B., & Jain, V. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management: A review of literature and implications for future research. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(5), 1001–1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003Peters, G.-J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity. The European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69.Preguntas Frecuentes \| Evaluación B. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://bimpactassessment.net/how-it-works/frequently-asked-questions/theverification-process#dónde-puedo-ver-cuántos-puntos-vale-cada-preguntaRajindra, R., Burhanuddin, B., Rukhayati, & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Sustainable supply chain governance mechanisms: Strategic approaches to corporate sustainability. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 232–240.Rashidi, K., & Saen, R. F. (2018). Incorporating dynamic concept into gradual efficiency: Improving suppliers in sustainable supplier development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.092Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Going one’s own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.104Reficco, E., Gutiérrez, R., Jaén, M. H., & Auletta, N. (2018). Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.043Ronzani, C. M., Da Costa, P. R., Da Silva, L. F., Pigola, A., & De Paiva, E. M. (2020). Qualitative methods of analysis: an example of Atlas.TITM Software usage. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20(4), 284–311. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i4.1994RUES - Registro Unico Empresarial. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2021, from https://www.rues.org.co/Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007Schulz, S. A., & Flanigan, R. L. (2016). Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2014-0150Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business. In Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020Siqueira, R. P., & Pitassi, C. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovations: Can mindfulness make a difference? Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.056Sistema B Colombia. (n.d.). Quiénes Somos. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from https://sistemab.org/quienes-somos-4/Sistema B Colombia. (2020). ¡Febrero en Sistema B! Lanzamiento oficial del SDG Action Manager + Carta anual del presidente del fondo de inversión más grande del mundo -. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#search/melisa%40sistemab.org/FMfcgxwGDDqlwJWRhrkrWsBMdltqBmZCSmith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003Stubbs, W. (2017a). Sustainable Entrepreneurship and B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1920Stubbs, W. (2017b). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.093Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model.” Organization and Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2Tachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The Performance of Green Supply Chain Management Governance Mechanisms: A Supply Network and Complexity Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12072Van Der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–19.Vurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(SUPPL. 4), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0595-xWalker, D. H. T., Bourne, L. M., & Shelley, A. (2008). Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390Walker, H., Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T., & Spencer, R. (2012). Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.11.003Wang, J., & Ran, B. (2018). Sustainable Collaborative Governance in supply chain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010171Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2014). The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit. Business Horizons, 57(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.10.001Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2015). Evaluating CSR accomplishments of founding certified B Corps. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-07-2015-0010Yadlapalli, A., Rahman, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 196(April 2017), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.016Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (Sage (Ed.); 5th ed.). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005Yu, Y., & Huo, B. (2019). The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: The moderating role of relational capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.198Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005YURDUGÜL, H. (2008). MINIMUM SAMPLE SIZE FOR CRONBACH’S COEFFICIENT ALPHA: A MONTE CARLO STUDY CRONBACH ALFA KATSAYISI ÎÇÎN MÍNÍMUM ÖRNEKLEM GENÍ§LÍOl: MONTE-CARLO ÇALIÇMASI. 1999, 397–406.Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A. M., & Talib Bon, A. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.062Zhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.015GeneralLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83964https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/1/license.txtcccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6MD51ORIGINAL1032379410.2021.pdf1032379410.2021.pdfTesis de Maestría en ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialapplication/pdf3113608https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/2/1032379410.2021.pdf133aebacbb664d8f204f08efd331c23eMD52THUMBNAIL1032379410.2021.pdf.jpg1032379410.2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6074https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79788/3/1032379410.2021.pdf.jpg45ba81e89094dba0601bbd086706bf58MD53unal/79788oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/797882024-07-24 23:41:36.025Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.coUExBTlRJTExBIERFUMOTU0lUTwoKQ29tbyBlZGl0b3IgZGUgZXN0ZSDDrXRlbSwgdXN0ZWQgcHVlZGUgbW92ZXJsbyBhIHJldmlzacOzbiBzaW4gYW50ZXMgcmVzb2x2ZXIgbG9zIHByb2JsZW1hcyBpZGVudGlmaWNhZG9zLCBkZSBsbyBjb250cmFyaW8sIGhhZ2EgY2xpYyBlbiBHdWFyZGFyIHBhcmEgZ3VhcmRhciBlbCDDrXRlbSB5IHNvbHVjaW9uYXIgZXN0b3MgcHJvYmxlbWFzIG1hcyB0YXJkZS4KCk5PVEFTOgoqU0kgTEEgVEVTSVMgQSBQVUJMSUNBUiBBRFFVSVJJw5MgQ09NUFJPTUlTT1MgREUgQ09ORklERU5DSUFMSURBRCBFTiBFTCBERVNBUlJPTExPIE8gUEFSVEVTIERFTCBET0NVTUVOVE8uIFNJR0EgTEEgRElSRUNUUklaIERFIExBIFJFU09MVUNJw5NOIDAyMyBERSAyMDE1LCBQT1IgTEEgQ1VBTCBTRSBFU1RBQkxFQ0UgRUwgUFJPQ0VESU1JRU5UTyBQQVJBIExBIFBVQkxJQ0FDScOTTiBERSBURVNJUyBERSBNQUVTVFLDjUEgWSBET0NUT1JBRE8gREUgTE9TIEVTVFVESUFOVEVTIERFIExBIFVOSVZFUlNJREFEIE5BQ0lPTkFMIERFIENPTE9NQklBIEVOIEVMIFJFUE9TSVRPUklPIElOU1RJVFVDSU9OQUwgVU4sIEVYUEVESURBIFBPUiBMQSBTRUNSRVRBUsONQSBHRU5FUkFMLgoqTEEgVEVTSVMgQSBQVUJMSUNBUiBERUJFIFNFUiBMQSBWRVJTScOTTiBGSU5BTCBBUFJPQkFEQS4KUGFyYSB0cmFiYWpvcyBkZXBvc2l0YWRvcyBwb3Igc3UgcHJvcGlvIGF1dG9yOiBBbCBhdXRvYXJjaGl2YXIgZXN0ZSBncnVwbyBkZSBhcmNoaXZvcyBkaWdpdGFsZXMgeSBzdXMgbWV0YWRhdG9zLCBZbyBnYXJhbnRpem8gYWwgUmVwb3NpdG9yaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBVTiBlbCBkZXJlY2hvIGEgYWxtYWNlbmFybG9zIHkgbWFudGVuZXJsb3MgZGlzcG9uaWJsZXMgZW4gbMOtbmVhIGRlIG1hbmVyYSBncmF0dWl0YS4gRGVjbGFybyBxdWUgZGljaG8gbWF0ZXJpYWwgZXMgZGUgbWkgcHJvcGllZGFkIGludGVsZWN0dWFsIHkgcXVlIGVsIFJlcG9zaXRvcmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgVU4gbm8gYXN1bWUgbmluZ3VuYSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWQgc2kgaGF5IGFsZ3VuYSB2aW9sYWNpw7NuIGEgbG9zIGRlcmVjaG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yIGFsIGRpc3RyaWJ1aXIgZXN0b3MgYXJjaGl2b3MgeSBtZXRhZGF0b3MuIChTZSByZWNvbWllbmRhIGEgdG9kb3MgbG9zIGF1dG9yZXMgYSBpbmRpY2FyIHN1cyBkZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciBlbiBsYSBww6FnaW5hIGRlIHTDrXR1bG8gZGUgc3UgZG9jdW1lbnRvLikgRGUgbGEgbWlzbWEgbWFuZXJhLCBhY2VwdG8gbG9zIHTDqXJtaW5vcyBkZSBsYSBzaWd1aWVudGUgbGljZW5jaWE6IExvcyBhdXRvcmVzIG8gdGl0dWxhcmVzIGRlbCBkZXJlY2hvIGRlIGF1dG9yIGRlbCBwcmVzZW50ZSBkb2N1bWVudG8gY29uZmllcmVuIGEgbGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgTmFjaW9uYWwgZGUgQ29sb21iaWEgdW5hIGxpY2VuY2lhIG5vIGV4Y2x1c2l2YSwgbGltaXRhZGEgeSBncmF0dWl0YSBzb2JyZSBsYSBvYnJhIHF1ZSBzZSBpbnRlZ3JhIGVuIGVsIFJlcG9zaXRvcmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwsIHF1ZSBzZSBhanVzdGEgYSBsYXMgc2lndWllbnRlcyBjYXJhY3RlcsOtc3RpY2FzOiBhKSBFc3RhcsOhIHZpZ2VudGUgYSBwYXJ0aXIgZGUgbGEgZmVjaGEgZW4gcXVlIHNlIGluY2x1eWUgZW4gZWwgcmVwb3NpdG9yaW8sIHF1ZSBzZXLDoW4gcHJvcnJvZ2FibGVzIGluZGVmaW5pZGFtZW50ZSBwb3IgZWwgdGllbXBvIHF1ZSBkdXJlIGVsIGRlcmVjaG8gcGF0cmltb25pYWwgZGVsIGF1dG9yLiBFbCBhdXRvciBwb2Ryw6EgZGFyIHBvciB0ZXJtaW5hZGEgbGEgbGljZW5jaWEgc29saWNpdMOhbmRvbG8gYSBsYSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZC4gYikgTG9zIGF1dG9yZXMgYXV0b3JpemFuIGEgbGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgTmFjaW9uYWwgZGUgQ29sb21iaWEgcGFyYSBwdWJsaWNhciBsYSBvYnJhIGVuIGVsIGZvcm1hdG8gcXVlIGVsIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvIGxvIHJlcXVpZXJhIChpbXByZXNvLCBkaWdpdGFsLCBlbGVjdHLDs25pY28gbyBjdWFscXVpZXIgb3RybyBjb25vY2lkbyBvIHBvciBjb25vY2VyKSB5IGNvbm9jZW4gcXVlIGRhZG8gcXVlIHNlIHB1YmxpY2EgZW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgcG9yIGVzdGUgaGVjaG8gY2lyY3VsYSBjb24gdW4gYWxjYW5jZSBtdW5kaWFsLiBjKSBMb3MgYXV0b3JlcyBhY2VwdGFuIHF1ZSBsYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHNlIGhhY2UgYSB0w610dWxvIGdyYXR1aXRvLCBwb3IgbG8gdGFudG8sIHJlbnVuY2lhbiBhIHJlY2liaXIgZW1vbHVtZW50byBhbGd1bm8gcG9yIGxhIHB1YmxpY2FjacOzbiwgZGlzdHJpYnVjacOzbiwgY29tdW5pY2FjacOzbiBww7pibGljYSB5IGN1YWxxdWllciBvdHJvIHVzbyBxdWUgc2UgaGFnYSBlbiBsb3MgdMOpcm1pbm9zIGRlIGxhIHByZXNlbnRlIGxpY2VuY2lhIHkgZGUgbGEgbGljZW5jaWEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucyBjb24gcXVlIHNlIHB1YmxpY2EuIGQpIExvcyBhdXRvcmVzIG1hbmlmaWVzdGFuIHF1ZSBzZSB0cmF0YSBkZSB1bmEgb2JyYSBvcmlnaW5hbCBzb2JyZSBsYSBxdWUgdGllbmVuIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBxdWUgYXV0b3JpemFuIHkgcXVlIHNvbiBlbGxvcyBxdWllbmVzIGFzdW1lbiB0b3RhbCByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWQgcG9yIGVsIGNvbnRlbmlkbyBkZSBzdSBvYnJhIGFudGUgbGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgTmFjaW9uYWwgeSBhbnRlIHRlcmNlcm9zLiBFbiB0b2RvIGNhc28gbGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgTmFjaW9uYWwgZGUgQ29sb21iaWEgc2UgY29tcHJvbWV0ZSBhIGluZGljYXIgc2llbXByZSBsYSBhdXRvcsOtYSBpbmNsdXllbmRvIGVsIG5vbWJyZSBkZWwgYXV0b3IgeSBsYSBmZWNoYSBkZSBwdWJsaWNhY2nDs24uIGUpIExvcyBhdXRvcmVzIGF1dG9yaXphbiBhIGxhIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkIHBhcmEgaW5jbHVpciBsYSBvYnJhIGVuIGxvcyDDrW5kaWNlcyB5IGJ1c2NhZG9yZXMgcXVlIGVzdGltZW4gbmVjZXNhcmlvcyBwYXJhIHByb21vdmVyIHN1IGRpZnVzacOzbi4gZikgTG9zIGF1dG9yZXMgYWNlcHRhbiBxdWUgbGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgTmFjaW9uYWwgZGUgQ29sb21iaWEgcHVlZGEgY29udmVydGlyIGVsIGRvY3VtZW50byBhIGN1YWxxdWllciBtZWRpbyBvIGZvcm1hdG8gcGFyYSBwcm9ww7NzaXRvcyBkZSBwcmVzZXJ2YWNpw7NuIGRpZ2l0YWwuIFNJIEVMIERPQ1VNRU5UTyBTRSBCQVNBIEVOIFVOIFRSQUJBSk8gUVVFIEhBIFNJRE8gUEFUUk9DSU5BRE8gTyBBUE9ZQURPIFBPUiBVTkEgQUdFTkNJQSBPIFVOQSBPUkdBTklaQUNJw5NOLCBDT04gRVhDRVBDScOTTiBERSBMQSBVTklWRVJTSURBRCBOQUNJT05BTCBERSBDT0xPTUJJQSwgTE9TIEFVVE9SRVMgR0FSQU5USVpBTiBRVUUgU0UgSEEgQ1VNUExJRE8gQ09OIExPUyBERVJFQ0hPUyBZIE9CTElHQUNJT05FUyBSRVFVRVJJRE9TIFBPUiBFTCBSRVNQRUNUSVZPIENPTlRSQVRPIE8gQUNVRVJETy4KUGFyYSB0cmFiYWpvcyBkZXBvc2l0YWRvcyBwb3Igb3RyYXMgcGVyc29uYXMgZGlzdGludGFzIGEgc3UgYXV0b3I6IERlY2xhcm8gcXVlIGVsIGdydXBvIGRlIGFyY2hpdm9zIGRpZ2l0YWxlcyB5IG1ldGFkYXRvcyBhc29jaWFkb3MgcXVlIGVzdG95IGFyY2hpdmFuZG8gZW4gZWwgUmVwb3NpdG9yaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBVTikgZXMgZGUgZG9taW5pbyBww7pibGljby4gU2kgbm8gZnVlc2UgZWwgY2FzbywgYWNlcHRvIHRvZGEgbGEgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpZGFkIHBvciBjdWFscXVpZXIgaW5mcmFjY2nDs24gZGUgZGVyZWNob3MgZGUgYXV0b3IgcXVlIGNvbmxsZXZlIGxhIGRpc3RyaWJ1Y2nDs24gZGUgZXN0b3MgYXJjaGl2b3MgeSBtZXRhZGF0b3MuCkFsIGhhY2VyIGNsaWMgZW4gZWwgc2lndWllbnRlIGJvdMOzbiwgdXN0ZWQgaW5kaWNhIHF1ZSBlc3TDoSBkZSBhY3VlcmRvIGNvbiBlc3RvcyB0w6lybWlub3MuCgpVTklWRVJTSURBRCBOQUNJT05BTCBERSBDT0xPTUJJQSAtIMOabHRpbWEgbW9kaWZpY2FjacOzbiAyNy8yMC8yMDIwCg==

Efecto del desarrollo y evaluación de proveedores sostenibles bajo mecanismos de gobernanza formales e informales sobre el desempeño del triple bottom line en organizaciones híbridas

Publicaciones similares