Effects of land-use change on Nitisols properties in a tropical climate

Land use change, especially conversion of native forests to cultivated land, exerts an impact on the physical, chemical and hydrophysical soils properties. To quantify and better understand responses, this study was aimed at evaluating the influence of different tropical soil management systems refl...

Full description

Autores:
Olivera Viciedo, Dilier
Hernández Jiménez, Alberto
Rodríguez González, Manuel
Lizcano Toledo, Rodolfo
Calero, Alexander
Peña Calzada, Kolima
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/65943
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65943
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66966/
Palabra clave:
63 Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas / Agriculture
Degradation
Physical properties
Soil management
Tillage
Degradación
Propiedades físicas
Manejo del suelo
Labranza
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Description
Summary:Land use change, especially conversion of native forests to cultivated land, exerts an impact on the physical, chemical and hydrophysical soils properties. To quantify and better understand responses, this study was aimed at evaluating the influence of different tropical soil management systems reflected in some physic, chemical and hydro-physical properties. Nine Nitisol profiles were evaluated and grouped in three categories: (I) native forest (Benchmark 30 years); (II) soils formerly cultivated then turned to pasture (Conservation 10 years); and (III) soils under continuous cultivation (Agrogenic 50 years). The analyzed variables were organic matter, bulk density, soil particle density, porosity, field capacity, texture and structural index. Results determine that the action of traditional farming techniques in tropical environments produces excessive soil degradation. Organic matter content and the structural index showed a linear relationship with high degree of dependence (R2=0.99). Bulk density average for (I) and (II) profile were lower (P0.05) than the bulk density values for (III). In the regression analyses the bulk density increased, the field capacity decreased, and the tendency for profile (I) and (II) were of a linear type. While the profile for (III) was of a polynomial type with (R2=0.83), being able to be influenced by the higher values of bulk density, greater soil compaction, lower structural index, organic matter and porosity in correspondence with the other profiles.