A review of conceptual transparency in us and colombian seismic design building codes
The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colom...
- Autores:
-
Carrillo, Julian
Blandón Valencia, John
Rubiano, Astrid
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/73161
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/73161
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/37636/
- Palabra clave:
- seismic design
strength reduction
over-strength
ductility
displacement amplification
drift limit
diseño sísmico
reducción de resistencia
sobrerresistencia
ductilidad
amplificación de desplazamiento
límite de deriva
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Summary: | The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colombia for seismic design of buildings. It is demonstrated that the procedures used in most codes do not offer a clear view of buildings’ seismic response assessment. The Colombian code should become as conceptually transparent as possible when defining strength modification factors and assessing maximum lateral displacement. In addition, at least two limit states (service and life safety) should be clearly defined, along with allowable story drift thereby better reflect expected structural performance. Otherwise, using current procedures could lead not only to interpretation errors but also inadequate estimation of seismic strength and deformation demands. |
---|