Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design
ilustraciones, graficas
- Autores:
-
Osorio Bustamante, Ferney
- Tipo de recurso:
- Doctoral thesis
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/81040
- Palabra clave:
- 720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigación
Innovation lab
Strategic intent
Strategic management
Multi-case study
Action research
Assessment
Laboratorio de innovación
Intención estratégica
Gestión estratégica
Estudio de casos múltiples
Investigación-acción
Evaluación
Laboratoire d'innovation
Intention stratégique
Gestion stratégique
Étude de cas multiples
Recherche-action
Évaluation
Laboratorio de investigación
Research laboratories
Instalación científica
Centro de investigación
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_c9465f296e2aa206d6763b44510392f6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/81040 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| dc.title.translated.fra.fl_str_mv |
Gestion des laboratoires d’innovation : Une approche méthodologique pour la conception de l’intention stratégique |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gestión de laboratorios de innovación: Un enfoque metodológico orientado al diseño de la intención estratégica |
| title |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| spellingShingle |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design 720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigación Innovation lab Strategic intent Strategic management Multi-case study Action research Assessment Laboratorio de innovación Intención estratégica Gestión estratégica Estudio de casos múltiples Investigación-acción Evaluación Laboratoire d'innovation Intention stratégique Gestion stratégique Étude de cas multiples Recherche-action Évaluation Laboratorio de investigación Research laboratories Instalación científica Centro de investigación |
| title_short |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| title_full |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| title_fullStr |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| title_sort |
Management of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention design |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Osorio Bustamante, Ferney |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Peña Reyes, José Ismael Camargo, Mauricio Dupont, Laurent |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Osorio Bustamante, Ferney |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigación |
| topic |
720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigación Innovation lab Strategic intent Strategic management Multi-case study Action research Assessment Laboratorio de innovación Intención estratégica Gestión estratégica Estudio de casos múltiples Investigación-acción Evaluación Laboratoire d'innovation Intention stratégique Gestion stratégique Étude de cas multiples Recherche-action Évaluation Laboratorio de investigación Research laboratories Instalación científica Centro de investigación |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Innovation lab Strategic intent Strategic management Multi-case study Action research Assessment |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Laboratorio de innovación Intención estratégica Gestión estratégica Estudio de casos múltiples Investigación-acción Evaluación |
| dc.subject.proposal.fra.fl_str_mv |
Laboratoire d'innovation Intention stratégique Gestion stratégique Étude de cas multiples Recherche-action Évaluation |
| dc.subject.unesco.none.fl_str_mv |
Laboratorio de investigación Research laboratories Instalación científica Centro de investigación |
| description |
ilustraciones, graficas |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-22T20:56:42Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-22T20:56:42Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Doctorado |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81040 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81040 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: The contribution of public innovation labs. In Technical Note. https://publications.iadb.org/en/innovationbetter-management-contribution-public-innovation-labs Agogué, M., Berthet, E., Fredberg, T., le Masson, P., Segrestin, B., Stoetzel, M., Wiener, M., & Yström, A. (2017). Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005 Aguilar, M. G. S., Rosillo, V. M. L., Perez, C. O. M., Arellano, Ma. R. M., Ramirez, J. R. B., & Trejo, J. A. O. (2019). Analysis of Wastewater Production to Implement Circular Economy Solutions in a Smart Cities University Campus Living Lab. 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071711 Ahmad, T., Ahmad, S., Jamshed, M., Sherwani, F. K., Ali, R., Khan, W., Nomani, A., & Qaisar, T. M. (2017). An ISM approach for analyzing the enablers in India’s makerspace platforms. 2017 Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) - The MakerSpace: From Imagining to Making!, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/LT.2017.8088121 Allen, J. P., & van der Velden, R. K. W. (2005). The role of self-assessment in measuring skills (No. 2; REFLEX Working Paper Series). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153922219 Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167. http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdf Amenta, L., Attademo, A., Remøy, H., Berruti, G., Cerreta, M., Formato, E., Palestino, M. F., & Russo, M. (2019). Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach. Urban Planning, 4(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 Andersen, E. S., & Jessen, S. A. (2003). Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00088-1 Annett, M., Grossman, T., Wigdor, D., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2019). Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301420 Apolitical. (2019, February). Public innovation labs around the world are closing — here’s why. The Future of Government. https://apolitical.co/solution_article/public-innovation-labsaround-the-world-are-closing-heres-why/ Appelo, J. (2011). Management 3.0 : leading Agile developers, developing Agile leaders. Addison Wesley. Arciniegas, G., Šileryté, R., Dąbrowski, M., Wandl, A., Dukai, B., Bohnet, M., & Gutsche, J.-M. (2019). A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning. Urban Planning, 4(3), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2173 Argyris, C. (1977, September). Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 115–125. https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations Argyris, C. (2002). Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509400 Arnould, M., Morel, L., & Fournier, M. (2020). Developing a territorial diagnostic as part of a living lab process: Implementation to improve management and wood mobilization in small French private forest. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198373 Badilescu-Buga, E. (2013). Knowledge behaviour and social adoption of innovation. Information Processing and Management, 49(4), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.02.001 Baedeker, C., Piwowar, J., Themann, P., Grinewitschus, V., Krisemendt, B., Lepper, K., Zimmer, C., & von Geibler, J. (2020). Interactive Design to Encourage Energy Efficiency in Offices: Developing and Testing a User-Centered Building Management System Based on a Living Lab Approach. Sustainability, 12(17), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176956 Bartelt, V. L., Urbaczewski, A., Mueller, A. G., & Sarker, S. (2020). Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: a social capital perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1762127 Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 1996 11:3, 11(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289 Beel, J., Aizawa, A., Breitinger, C., & Gipp, B. (2017). Mr. DLib: Recommendations-as-a-Service (RaaS) for Academia. 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991606 Beel, J., Collins, A., Kopp, O., Dietz, L. W., & Knoth, P. (2019). Online Evaluations for Everyone: Mr. DLib’s Living Lab for Scholarly Recommendations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11438 LNCS (pp. 213–219). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_27 Belbin, R. M. (2010). Team roles at work, second edition. In Team Roles at Work, Second Edition (Second). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080963242 Benabbas, A., & Nicklas, D. (2019). Quality-Aware Sensor Data Stream Management in a Living Lab Environment. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730858 Björklund, T., Keipi, T., Celik, S., & Ekman, K. (2019). Learning across silos: Design Factories as hubs for co‐creation. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12372 Björklund, T., Laakso, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Ekman, K. (2017). Passion-based co-creation. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/29068 Björklund, T., Luukkonen, S., Clavert, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Laakso, M. (2011). Aalto University Design Factory through the eyes of its community members. Aalto University Design Factory. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/12171 Blok, V. (2021). What Is Innovation?: Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/TECHNE2020109129 Bloom, L., & Faulkner, R. (2016). Innovation spaces: lessons from the United Nations. Third World Quarterly, 37(8), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1135730 Boeri, A., Longo, D., Gianfrate, V., & Lorenzo, V. (2017). Resilient Communities. Social Infrastructures for Sustainable Growth of Urban Areas. A Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(02), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N2-227-237 Böhm, K., & Paul, C. (2019). “CoMod” A Model to Support Collaboration and Innovation Between Digital Innovation Labs and SMEs. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 1, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.34190/KM.19.066 Boly, V., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2016). Ingénierie de l’Innovation (3e Édition). Lavoisier, Hermès. https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/economie/ingenierie-de-l-innovation-et-projetsinnovants-3e-ed/boly/descriptif-9782746247475 Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Brem, A. (2019). Permeability in Coworking-Spaces as an Innovation Facilitator. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893737 Bousbiat, H., Klemenjak, C., Leitner, G., & Elmenreich, W. (2020). Augmenting an Assisted Living Lab with Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring. 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128406 Bradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (H. Bradbury, Ed.; Third). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research/book242797 Breytenbach, J., & Kariem, I. (2020). A Living Labs Approach to Manage Co-created Design Knowledge through Ideation Artefacts. 2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.245373 Brock, K. L. (2020). Government and Non-profit Collaboration in Times of Deliverology, Policy Innovation Laboratories and Hubs, and New Public Governance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0 Burgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (1996). Strategic Dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165830 Caccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12357. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357 Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil. Camargo, M., Morel, L., & Lhoste, P. (2021). Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership. In D. Mietzner & C. Schultz (Eds.), New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. (1st ed., pp. 181–205). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_11 Capdevila, I. (2013). Typologies of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, January, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414402 Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering Collaborative Policy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help? The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–25. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2986463431/poweringcollaborative-policy-innovation-can-innovation Carter, K., Morgan, E., Webb, L., Goddard, N., & Webb, J. (2017). Enhance: The assembly rooms energy living lab. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 669–676. Chatenier, E. du, Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R and D Management, 40(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41. Chessa, S., Girolami, M., Foschini, L., Ianniello, R., Corradi, A., & Bellavista, P. (2017). Mobile crowd sensing management with the ParticipAct living lab. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 38, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.09.005 Christensen, M. H., Li, R., & Pinson, P. (2020). Demand side management of heat in Smart homes: Living-lab experiments. Energy, 195, 116993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116993 Claire, J., Galvez, D., Boly, V., Camargo, M., & Moselle, J. C. (2014). A new innovation Project maturity assessment methodology based on innovation degree. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871614 Corsini, L., Dammicco, V., & Moultrie, J. (2020). Frugal innovation in a crisis: the digital fabrication maker response to COVID‐19. R&D Management, radm.12446. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12446 Crippa, D., & di Prete, B. (2019). Towards a Digital Healthcare Revolution Views and Researches of the Milanese FabLab Community. In T. S., M. B., K. W., D. N. M., & R. E. (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 793, pp. 214–223). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_20 Dalziel, M. (2010). Why do innovation intermediaries exist. DRUID Summer Conference 2010 on Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Innovation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228855626_Why_do_innovation_intermediaries_exist DeCusatis, C. (2008). Creating, Growing and Sustaining Efficient Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00478.x del Vecchio, P., Elia, G., Ndou, V., Secundo, G., & Specchia, F. (2017). Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(05), 1750024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500249 Delgado, L., Galvez, D., Hassan, A., Palominos, P., & Morel, L. (2020). Innovation Spaces in Universities: Support for Collaborative Learning. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 31(1), 123–153. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0064 Deng, J. (2018). Exploration of building and running open labs in application-technology universities. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.26802/jaots.2018.10834 Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). SUSTAINED PRODUCT INNOVATION IN LARGE, MATURE ORGANIZATIONS: OVERCOMING INNOVATION-TO-ORGANIZATION PROBLEMS. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. https://doi.org/10.2307/256994 Drew, K. (2017). Our Innovation Labs are dead. Long live innovation! UNHCR Innovation. https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/our-innovation-labs-are-dead-long-live-innovation/ Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1986). Five steps from novice to expert. In Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (p. 231). Free Press. Dupont, L. (2009). Transfert du génie industriel vers l’ingénierie urbaine : vers une aproche collaborative des projets urbains [Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine - INPL]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00734950/ Dupont, L. (2019). Agile innovation: Creating value in uncertain environments. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0001 Dupont, L., Gabriel, A., Camargo, M., & Guidat, C. (2017). Collaborative innovation projects engaging open communities: A case study on emerging challenges. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280002 Dupont, L., Guidat, C., Morel, L., & Skiba, N. (2016). The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference, ICE/ITMC 2015, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438669 Dupont, L., Mastelic, J., Nyffeler, N., Latrille, S., & Seulliet, E. (2019). Living lab as a support to trust for co-creation of value: application to the consumer energy market. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0053 Dupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2015). Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of “Chaire REVES.” Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 245– 265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027 Dupont, L., Morel, L., Hubert, J., & Guidat, C. (2014). Study case: Living Lab Mode for urban project design: Emergence of an ad hoc methodology through collaborative innovation. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871550 Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866 Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 Ekvall, G. (1997). Organizational Conditions and Levels of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00070 Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z El-Namaki, M. S. S. (1992). Creating a corporate vision. Long Range Planning, 25(6), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90166-Y Enjolras, M. (2016). Méthodologie d’analyse de la capacité à innover et à exporter des PME manufacturières et de procédés : identification et caractérisation d’un espace commun en vue de l’élaboration d’un outil multicritères d’aide à la décision [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2016LORR0149 Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Schmitt, C. (2020). Evaluating Innovation and Export Capabilities of SMEs: Toward a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(3), 17–32. https://173.236.245.237/index.php/GT/article/view/3440 Espinosa, J. M. M., Miranda, J., Cortés, D., Medina, J., & Molina, A. (2020). 3D Virtual Environments to Support New Product Development: A Mobile Platform Based on an Open Innovation Laboratory Applied in Higher Education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 12015 LNCS (pp. 483–496). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54407-2_41 Fecher, F., Winding, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2020). Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 110, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.039 Finocchiaro, L., & Wågø, S. I. (2017). Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: An analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living Lab in Trondheim. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 216–223. Fitzpatrick, G., & Malmborg, L. (2018). Quadruple helix model organisation and tensions in participatory design teams. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240191 Fonteijn, R., Roos, M. H., Nguyen, P. H., Morren, J., & Slootweg, J. G. (2018). The Strijp-S living-lab: testing innovative solutions for fault protection, self-healing, congestion management, and voltage control. 2018 53rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2018.8542117 Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104390 Fuller, M. (2017). Fitting squares into round holes: Enabling innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship through corporate Fab labs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2(DS87-2), 407–416. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/39595/Fitting+squares+into+round+holes%3A+Enabling+innovation%2C+creativity%2C+and+entrepreneurship+through+corporate+Fab+Labs Gallegos-Segovia, P. L., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., Vintimilla-Tapia, P. E.,Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Arevalo-Cordero, S. J., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., & Arévalo-Cordero, S. J. (2017). Living lab concept for cloud analysis in networks of metropolitan sensors applying the concept of SD-WAN and hybrid networks. 2017 CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), 2017-Janua, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHILECON.2017.8229520 Galvez Manriquez, D. (2015). Évaluation de la capacité à innover : une approche par auto évaluation et suivi supporté par des analyses multicritères dynamiques [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2015LORR0018# Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: a literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205. Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003 Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029 Geist, M. J., Sanders, R., Harris, K., Arce-Trigatti, A., & Hitchcock-Cass, C. (2019). Clinical Immersion: An Approach for Fostering Cross-disciplinary Communication and Innovation in Nursing and Engineering Students. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000547 Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00451.x Gey, R., Meyer, L. P., & Thieme, M. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon Innovation Laboratory: A Structurational Viewpoint. XXIII International RESER Conference, 1–17. Gingstad, K., Jekteberg, Ø., & Balog, K. (2020). ArXivDigest: A Living Lab for Personalized Scientific Literature Recommendation. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 3393–3396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3417417 Giones, F., Kleine, K., & Tegtmeier, S. (2021). Students as scientists’ co-pilots at the onset of technology transfer: a two-way learning process. The Journal of Technology Transfer 2021, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-021-09880-3 Goduscheit, R. C. (2014). Innovation promoters - A multiple case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.020 Goncalves, G. M., Meneses, R., Faria, J. P., & Vidal, R. M. (2020). A living lab for profesional skills development in Software Engineering Management at U.Porto. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2020-April, 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125099 Gratton, L. (1994). Implementing Strategic Intent: Human Resource Processes as a Force for Change. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8616.1994.tb00069.x Gregoire, M. (2016). Exploring various approaches of social innovation: a francophone literature review and a proposal of innovation typology. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p45-71 GREVE, K., LEMINEN, S., de VITA, R., & WESTERLUND, M. (2020). UNVEILING THE DIVERSITY OF SCHOLARLY DEBATE ON LIVING LABS: A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(08), 2040003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620400034 Gross, E. (1969). The Definition of Organizational Goals. The British Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/588953 Gryszkiewicz, L., Lykourentzou, I., & Toivonen, T. (2016). Innovation Labs: Leveraging Openness for Radical Innovation? Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 68–97. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2556692 Günzel, H., Brehm, L., Haak, H.-J., Grönvall, M., & Sainio, A.-M. (2019). DI2 Co-Innovation Lab: Teaching software development in and for real business situations. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference on ZZZ, 116–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375273 Habibipour, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Georges, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Schuurman, D. (2018). Drop-out in living lab field test: Analysing consequences and some recommendations. 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of SocioTechnical Change, ECIS 2018. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061326020&partnerID=40&md5=15da586a69e94b820681020a92de96d8 Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (2005, July). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2005/07/strategic-intent Hart, S. L. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279547 Hawkins, N., Lewis, J. E., & Robinson, B. S. (2020). Employment of active learning pedagogy throughout a makerspace-based, first-year introduction to engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095745666&partnerID=40&md5=4c71949ca04b6a8ef6126a85201bf6f4 Hellström, T., Jacob, M., & Malmquist, U. (2002). Guiding innovation socially and cognitively: the innovation team model at Skanova Networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210436745 Henike, T., Kamprath, M., & Hölzle, K. (2019). Effecting, but effective? How business model visualisations unfold cognitive impacts. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101925 Hering, D., & Phillips, J. (2005). Innovation Roles The People You Need for Successful Innovation (White Paper). Herrera, N. R., Davis-Owusu, K., van Oers, S., de Van Der Schueren, M., Alberts, J., & Vastenburg, M. (2018). FoodSampler: Engaging people to contextualise food behaviour: Mixed methods for monitoring choices and triggers of eating habits. Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240948 Herron, J., & Kaneshiro, K. (2017). A University-Wide Collaborative Effort to Designing a Makerspace at an Academic Health Sciences Library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1259878 Holm, E. J. van. (2015). Makerspaces and Contributions to Entrepreneurship. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167 Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257 Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 Hugo, H., Espinoza, F., Morales, I., Ortiz, E., Pérez, S., & Salcedo, G. (2018). Delta project: Towards a sustainable campus. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103695 Hund, A., Holotiuk, F., Wagner, H.-T., & Beimborn, D. (2020). Knowledge management in the digital era: How digital innovation labs facilitate knowledge recombination. 27th European Conference on Information Systems - Information Systems for a Sharing Society, ECIS 2019. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85087105146&partnerID=40&md5=9db4f82fd613d44870efc50183605dd0 Innov8rs Team. (2017). Innovation Labs: Flying, or Failing? Innova8rs.Co. https://innov8rs.co/news/innovation-labs-flying-failing/ ISO. (2019). Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance (ISO Standard No. 56002). https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html Jenssen, J. I., & Jørgensen, G. (2004). How do Corporate Champions promote innovations? International Journal of Innovation Management, 08(01), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919604000964 Jezierski, E., Harvey, J., Hansen, L., Takeuchi, M., Sinha, R., Kieboom, K. M. M., & Edwards, D. (2014). Labcraft: How Social Labs Cultivate Change Through Innovation and Collaboration. Labcraft Publishing. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/labcraft-innovationlabs-cultivate-change/ Jin, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, J. (2020). Efficiency and influencing factors of crowd innovation spaces in China. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Information Systems (IS) for the Future, PACIS 2020. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089128052&partnerID=40&md5=c6beb47961e4151fb7ca1c201b7d8b5f Jin, Z. R., & Qiu, A. Z. (2019). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Testbed as an Integrated Approach for New Mobility - A Living Lab Case Study in Singapore. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11596 LNCS (pp. 441–458). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_32 Jukema, J. S., Veerman, M., van Alphen, J., Visser, G., Smits, C., & Kingma, T. (2019). Nurturing gerontology students’ intrinsic motivation to cocreate: The design of a powerful learning environment. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 40(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2017.1377702 Kaar, C., & Stary, C. (2020). Empowering Makers – A Design Science Approach. 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology Management, PartF168981, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446590.3446606 Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity – a longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09- 2013-0074 Kant, M., & Kanda, W. (2019). Innovation intermediaries: What does it take to survive over time? Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.04.213 Kasmi, F., Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Marche, B., & Camargo, M. (2021). Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, Prépublication(0), I113-42. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0113 Katzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., & Sailer, K. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764982 Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2005). The ten faces of innovation : IDEO’s strategies for beating the devil’s advocate & driving creativity throughout your organization. Currency/Doubleday. Kieboom, M., van Exel, T., & Sigaloff, C. (2015). Lab Practice: creating spaces for social change. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/lab-practice-creating-spaces-for-social-change/ Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006 Klautzer, L., Hong, S. Y., & Narayan, R. (2020). More than a thought experiment -- conceptualizing and implementing an Urban Living Lab. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(3), 032019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032019 Klooker, M., Matzdorf, S., Nicolai, C., Boettcher, L., & Trost, A. (2015). The Importance of Strategic Intent in Developing Innovation Space. ISPIM Innovation Symposium. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), December, 1–19. https://search.proquest.com/openview/aafe571adc2facc4649c96ee12298f3c/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2040562 Klooker, M., Schwemmle, M., Nicolai, C., & Weinberg, U. (2019). Making Use of Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework of Strategizing Spatial Interventions. In C. Meinel & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research : Looking Further: Design Thinking Beyond Solution-Fixation (pp. 75–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97082-0_5 Knoll Workplace Research. (2013). Creating Collaborative Spaces that Work. https://www.knoll.com/document/1352994554274/CollaborativeWorkplace_wp.pdf Kohtala, C. (2018). Makerspaces as free experimental zones. In M. Charter (Ed.), Designing for the Circular Economy (1st Edition, pp. 260–269). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113067-24 Kratzer, J., Leenders, O. T. A. J., & Engelen, J. M. L. van. (2004). Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.x Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006a). Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation, 26(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.016 Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006b). Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00372.x Kristensen, T. (2004). The Physical Context of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x Laakso, M., & Clavert, M. (2014). Promover la creatividad y las habilidades del pensamiento de diseño entre los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 104, 215–228. https://research.aalto.fi/fi/publications/promover-la-creatividad-y-las-habilidades-delpensamiento-de-dise Lacroix, J., Dupont, L., Guidat, C., & Loterr, G. H. (2017). “Smarterized” urban project process with living lab approach: Exploration through a case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279939 Lake, D., Fernando, H., & Eardley, D. (2016). The social lab classroom: Wrestling with—and learning from—sustainability challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 12(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908155 Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 le Dinh, T., Ayayi, A., Vu, M. C., & Nomo, T. S. (2018). Managing co-creation rojects: The service-oriented perspective. Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(3), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.19255/jmpm324 Leicher, A. (2017). The rise and death of corporate innovation labs. Hacker Noon. https://hackernoon.com/the-rise-and-death-of-corporate-innovation-labs-6139b9000d40 Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. (2019). Innovation Mechanism(s) in ThirdGeneration Living Labs: Towards Unification of Collaborative Innovation Networks. ISPIMConference Proceedings, 1–24. https://search.proquest.com/openview/cb5f04c12b7b8fba355bbac3c25a1ff8/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=1796422 Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School. http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990060514740203941/catalog Lépine, V., & Martin-Juchat, F. (2020). Enjeux communicationnels des recherches partenariales dans le contexte des open labs. Http://Journals.Openedition.Org/Communiquer, 30, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.4000/COMMUNIQUER.7396 Lewis, J. M. (2020). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077 Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The Organizational Innovation Laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00327.x Lin, Q., & Wong, S. (2017). A study of intellectual property protection for mass innovation spaces. 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 973–975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988606 Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<875::AIDSMJ126>3.0.CO;2-P Magadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00540.x Maier, A. M., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012). Assessing Organizational Capabilities: Reviewing and Guiding the Development of Maturity Grids. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2077289 Mantere, S., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). Strategic intent as a rhetorical device. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.03.002 Mao, C. (2020). Research on The Application of Blockchain Technology in The Construction and Management of Smart Laboratory. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering, PartF168986, 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452940.3453067 Marantos, C., Paraskevas, I. S., Siozios, K., Mothe, J., Menou, C., & Soudris, D. (2017). FabSpace 2.0: A platform for application and service development based on Earth Observation data. 2017 6th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2017.7937657 Maravilhas, S., & Martins, J. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061 Mariadoss, B. J., Johnson, J. L., & Martin, K. D. (2014). Strategic intent and performance: The role of resource allocation decisions. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2393–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.006 Markopoulos, E., Aggarwal, V., & Vanharanta, H. (2020). Democratization of Intrapreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship Within the McKinsey’s Three Horizons Innovation Space. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1026, pp. 1007–1017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_150 Mastelic, J., Emery, L., Previdoli, D., Papilloud, L., Cimmino, F., & Genoud, S. (2018). Energy management in a public building: A case study co-designing the building energy management system. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 1517–1523. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280062 Mburu, S. N., & Thuo, J. K. (2015). Understanding the Concept of Strategic Intent. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(6), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss6.384 McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7 McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2019). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946 Memon, A. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Towards the Functional Roles of an Innovation Laboratory as a Platform for Innovation: An Observational Approach. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.2017010103 Memon, A. B., Meyer, K., Thieme, M., & Meyer, L.-P. (2018). Inter-InnoLab collaboration: An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among Innovation Laboratories. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.003 Memon, A. B., Meyer, K., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Toward collaborative networking among innovation laboratories: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2021-0069 Mérindol, V., Bouquin, N., Versailles, D. W., Capdevila, I., Aubouin, N., le Chaffotec, A., Chiovetta, A., & Voisin, T. (2016). Le livre blanc des open labs : Quelles pratiques ? Quels changements en France. Futuris ANRT-NEWPIC. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27107.96806 Mérindol, V., Gallié, E. P., & Capdevila, I. (2018). Technology-transfer offices and academic open labs as different types of organizational intermediaries in science-society relationships. Gestion 2000, 35(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3917/G2000.352.0125 Metzlar, A. (2017). Strategic intent and the strategic position of smallholders: a case study of a smallholders’ organization in the Ghanaian cocoa industry. Review of Social Economy, 75(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2017.1299202 Midwood, A. J., Hannam, K. D., Forge, T. A., Neilsen, D., Emde, D., & Jones, M. D. (2020). Importance of drive-row vegetation for soil carbon storage in woody perennial crops: A regional study. Geoderma, 377, 114591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114591 Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/miles3e Mingers, J. (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (1st ed.). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29841-X Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2 Miranda, J., Chavarria-Barrientos, D., Macias, M., Molina, M., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. K. (2018). Experiences in interactive collaborative learning using an open innovation laboratory: The design methodologies course as case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering, Technology and Innovation Management Beyond 2020: New Challenges, New Approaches, ICE/ITMC 2017 - Proceedings, 2018-Janua, 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280021 Mochizuki, Y. (2018). Global perspective for data-leveraged smart city initiatives. NEC Technical Journal, 13(1), 14–18. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059419834&partnerID=40&md5=ca17914898f2e7b2d7edf505748c9968 Moilanen, J. (2012). Emerging hackerspaces - Peer-production generation. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 378 AICT, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7 Morel, L., Dupont, L., & Boudarel, M.-R. (2018). Innovation spaces: new places for collective intelligence? In D. Uzunidis (Ed.), Collective Innovation Processes (Volume 4, pp. 87–107). Wiley-ISTE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119557883.ch5 Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202 Mortara, L., & Parisot, N. (2018). How do fab-spaces enable entrepreneurship? Case studies of “makers” - entrepreneurs. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 32(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2018.089465 Mortara, L., & Parisot, N. G. (2016). Through entrepreneurs’ eyes: the Fab-spaces constellation. International Journal of Production Research, 54(23), 7158–7180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1198505 Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2006). A tool to evaluate design performance in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 184–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192 Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2007). Development of a design audit tool for SMEs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00255.x Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U.-E., Janssen, S., & van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x Moya Sedan, C. A. (2021). Développement de la capacité à open innover des fournisseurs [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2021LORR0006 Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of Professional Competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning (pp. 107–137). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5 Nilsson, W., Bonnici, F., & Griffin EL, E. W. (2015). The social innovation lab: An experiment in the pedagogy of institutional work. In The Business of Social and Environmental Innovation: New Frontiers in Africa (pp. 201–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04051-6_11 Nur Rahma Putra, A. B., Mukhadis, A., Poerwanto, E. E., Irdianto, W., & Sembiring, A. I. (2018). Edmodo-Based Makerspace as E-Learning Technology to Improve the Management Project of Vocational Students in the Disruptive Technology Era. 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIET.2018.8693224 Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016 OECD. (2018). Digital Government Review of Colombia: Towards a Citizen-Driven Public Sector. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264291867-en Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136 Oladele-Emmanuel, B. D., Rejeb, H. ben, & Redlich, T. (2018). Strategic Management: SWOT Analysis of the African Digital Fabrication Laboratories. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436269 Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the great good places at the heart of our communities. Da Capo Press. Oliva, F. L., & Kotabe, M. (2019). Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1838–1856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0361 Olson, E. M., Cooper, R., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(98)90035-0 Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.423 O’Shannassy, T. F. (2016). Strategic intent: The literature, the construct and its role in predicting organization performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(5), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.46 Osorio Bustamante, F. (2015). Analysis of characteristics and types of infrastructure of innovation laboratories: implications for strategic management. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/59004 Osorio Bustamante, F., Pena Reyes, J. I., Camargo, M., & Dupont, L. (2016). Spaces to Foster and sustain innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438661 Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301 Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Pena, J. I. (2019). Constellation of Innovation Laboratories: A Scientific Outlook. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792816 Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Peña, J. I. (2021). Making the strategic intent of innovation labs operational: A process perspective on the case of the Lorraine Fab Living Lab. R&D Management Conference 2021 Innovation in an Era of Disruption, 1–13. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03285670 Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Peña, J. I. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n°31(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0066 Paje, R. C., Boco, L. B., Gloria, J. C. A., & Go, H. A. R. (2020). The Effect of Workplace Design on Employee Engagement, Collaborative Capability, and on Perceived Work Performance in Coworking Spaces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(3), 032063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032063 Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2015). Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 6(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823 Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Hatzichristos, T. (2020). Allocation of Residential Areas in Smart Insular Communities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(4), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020100103 Patterson, B., Casucci, T., Hull, B. E., & Lombardo, N. T. (2018). Library as the Technology Hub for the Health Sciences. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1514899 Patterson, M. G., Godon, C. H., Segan, L. D., & Mannickarottu, S. (2020). Under the hood of a bio-makerspace: Automating lab operations. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. Pearce II, J. A. (1982). The Company Mission As a Strategic Tool: What Is - ProQuest. Sloan Management Review (Pre-1986), 23(3). https://www.proquest.com/docview/206766548 Peña-Reyes, J.-I. (2010). E-learning en communautés isolées : le double isolement de l’apprenant [Grenoble]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2010GRENG002 Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 9(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.9.1.41_1 Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014). Designing and Enabling Spaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation: From managing to enabling innovation as socioepistemological technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.027 Petersen, I. haam, & Kruss, G. (2021). Universities as change agents in resource-poor local settings: An empirically grounded typology of engagement models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120693 Pham, T. v., Nguyen, A. T. T., Ngo, T. D., Le, D. H., Le, K. C. V., Nguyen, T. H. N., & Le, H. Q. (2020). Proposed Smart University Model as a Sustainable Living Lab for University Digital Transformation. 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1109/GTSD50082.2020.9303086 Pitt, M. (2001). In pursuit of change: managerial constructions of strategic intent. Strategic Change, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.528 Pittaway, L., Aissaoui, R., Ferrier, M., & Mass, P. (2019). University spaces for entrepreneurship: a process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 911–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2018-0584 Podmetina, D., Hafkesbrink, J., Teplov, R., Dabrowska, J., & Petraite, M. (2015). What Skills and Competences are required to Implement Open Innovation? ISPIM Conference Proceedings, June, 1–20. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1780140077/fulltext/11860BF316DB4B68PQ/1?accountid=14211 Podmetina, D., Soderquist, K. E., Petraite, M., & Teplov, R. (2018). Developing a competency model for open innovation: From the individual to the organisational level. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0445 Polderman, A., Haller, A., Viesi, D., Tabin, X., Sala, S., Giorgi, A., Darmayan, L., Rager, J., Vidovič, J., Daragon, Q., Verchère, Y., Zupan, U., Houbé, N., Heinrich, K., Bender, O., & Bidault, Y. (2020). How Can Ski Resorts Get Smart? Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Winter Tourism in the European Alps. Sustainability, 12(14), 5593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145593 Ponsard, C., Nihoul, B., & Touzani, M. (2019). Software eco-design for sustainable systems: Experience feedback in mobility and forest management [Éco-conception logicielle pour systèmes durables: Retours d’expérience en matière de mobilité et de gestion forestière]. 37th INFORSID 2019 - INFormatique Des ORganisations et Systemes d’Information et de Decision, 115–130. Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The Multinational Mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press. Provenzano, V., Seminara, M. R., & Arnone, M. (2020). Sustainable Development and Transition Management: A New Approach for European Peripheral Areas. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies: Vol. 177 SIST (pp. 37–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52869-0_4 Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/i-teamsthe-teams-and-funds-making-innovation-happen-in-governments-around-the-world/ Quintane, E., Mitch Casselman, R., Sebastian Reiche, B., & Nylund, P. A. (2011). Innovation as a knowledge‐based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 928–947. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179299 Raabe, J.-P., Horlach, B., Drews, P., & Schirmer, I. (2020). Digital innovation units: Exploring types, linking mechanisms and evolution strategies in bimodal it setups. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Business Information Systems 2020 “Developments, Opportunities and Challenges of Digitization”, WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 2020. https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_h5 Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2019). Open social innovation dynamics and impact: exploratory study of a fab lab network. R and D Management, 49(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12376 Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2021). Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391 Rezaee Vessal, S., Partouche-Sebban, J., Scuotto, V., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Overcoming stressful life events at do-it-yourself (DIY) laboratories. A new trailblazing career for disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120506 Rieken, F., Boehm, T., Heinzen, M., & Meboldt, M. (2019). Corporate makerspaces as innovation driver in companies: a literature review-based framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0098 Roberts, E. B., & Fusfeld, A. R. (1982). Critical functions: Needed roles in the innovation process. In R. Kats (Ed.), Carrer issues in human resource management (pp. 182–207). Prentice-Hall. https://books.google.fr/books/about/Career_issues_in_human_resource_manageme.html?id=4CYUAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y Rose, R., Groeger, L., & Hölzle, K. (2021). The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167 Roux-Marchand, T., Cruz, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Osorio, F. (2020). Connecting the strategic intent of innovation labs and projects: the case of the Green Fablab. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198320 Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884 Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556383 Sandiford, P. J. (2019). The Third Place as an Evolving Concept for Hospitality Researchers and Managers. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 43(7), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019855687 Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2017). Open innovation, living labs and public officials: The case of “mapaton” in Mexico. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047308 Sangiorgi, D., Lucchi, F., & Carrera, M. (2020). Co-designing Innovation Labs as Engines for Mental Healthcare Ecosystem Transformation (pp. 209–223). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_15 Santarsiero, F., Lerro, A., Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2021). Modelling and managing innovation lab as catalyst of digital transformation: theoretical and empirical evidence. Measuring Business Excellence, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE11-2020-0152 Schaeffer, J. A. (2017). Already There? Cultivating Emergent Places for Radical Innovation in Operations. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 255, pp. 131–149). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55985-8_8 Schmitt, U. (2017). Devising enabling spaces and affordances for personal knowledge management system design. Informing Science, 20, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.28945/3743 Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., Kawsar, F., Seys, C., Veeckman, C., de Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Living labs as quasi-experiments: results from the Flemish LeYLab. XXIV ISPIM Conference : Innovating in Global Markets: Challenges for Sustainable Growth, 1–15. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3237435/file/3237445.pdf Schuurman, D., Marez, L. de, & Ballon, P. (2013). Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1). http://timreview.ca/article/743 Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2016). Innovation in the public sector : exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Proceedings of the OpenLivingLab Days 2016, Montreal, Canada, 78–90. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU8532627 Searle, J. R. (1979). What Is an Intentional State? Mind, 88(349), 74–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253065 Seo, E., Bae, S., Choi, H., & Choi, D. (2020). Preference and usability of Smart-Home services and items - A Focus on the Smart-Home living-lab –. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1812397 Seo, J., Lysiankova, L., Ock, Y.-S. Y.-S., & Chun, D. (2017). Priorities of coworking space operation based on comparison of the hosts and users’ perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081494 Servaty, R., Perger, G., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2018). Working in a cocoon: (Co)working conditions of office nomads - a health related qualitative study of shared working environments. Work, 60(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182760 Sharp, D., & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699 Sheehan Jr., R. M. (1999). Achieving Growth and High Quality by Strategic Intent. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.9406 Siekkinen, T., Pekkola, E., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Change and continuity in the academic profession: Finnish universities as living labs. Higher Education, 79(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00422-3 Sillince, J. A. A. (1999). The Role of Political Language Forms and Language Coherence in the Organizational Change Process. Organization Studies, 20(3), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699203005 Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341 Sittoni, L., van Eekelen, E. M. M., van der Goot, F., & Nieboer, H. E. (2019). The Living Lab for mud: Integrated sediment management based on building with nature concepts. 22nd World Dredging Congress, WODCON 2019, 847–856. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071455613&partnerID=40&md5=3d815b9f92cba0ad7770e5e6d453c6ef Skiba, N., Dupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2012). A space for innovation process acceleration, supporting collaborative citizens workshops. 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297646 Smith, C. E. (1994). The Merlin Factor: Leadership and Strategic Intent. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.1994.tb00070.x Snead, L., & Wycoff, J. (1999). TOOLS@ WORK: Stimulating innovation with collaboration rooms. Journal for Quality and Participation, 55–57. Song, R., Clemon, L., & Telenko, C. (2019). Uncertainty and Variability of Energy and Material Use by Fused Deposition Modeling Printers in Makerspaces. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(3), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12772 Soomro, S. A., & Georgiev, G. v. (2020). A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE DIGITAL FABRICATION PROJECTS: THE ROLE OF DESIGN CREATIVITY. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2020), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.35199/ICDC.2020.46 Sroufe, R. (2020). Business Schools as Living Labs: Advancing Sustainability in Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 726–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920951590 Stercken, A. A. M. (2015). Cultivating Serendipity and Efficacy Beliefs: The Impact of (Caireen) Innovation Spaces on Human Development. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/305357 Stickel, O., Stilz, M., Brocker, A., Borchers, J., & Pipek, V. (2019). Fab:UNIverse - Makerspaces, Fab Labs and Lab Managers in Academia. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference on ZZZ - FabLearn Europe ’19, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335074 Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392581 Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 Tasca, R., Ventura, I. L. S., Borges, V., Leles, F. A. G., Gomes, R. de M., Ribas, A. N., Carvalho, W. M., & Jimenez, J. M. S. (2019). Laboratórios de inovação em saúde: por uma Atenção Primária à Saúde forte no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(6), 2021– 2030. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018246.08672019 Ten, I., Arbelaez-Garces, G., & Dupont, L. (2020). Designing interactive museum visitors’ experience using a Fab Living Lab platform: The Museum-Aquarium of Nancy case. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2020, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198641 Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049 Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsable research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751 Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939 TURILLAZZI, B., LEONI, G., GASPARI, J., IADANZA, E., MY, M., MASSARI, M., BOULANGER, S. O. M., & DJALALI, A. (2020). HERITAGE-LED ONTOLOGIES: DIGITAL PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING THE REGENERATION OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL SITES. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 249, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC200261 Valencia, M., Villacreses, S., Benitez, D. S., Velasco, A., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2018). Towards a Sustainable Energy-Efficient Future at Universities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Case Study, Phase I. 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2018.8564629 van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(03), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817 Vasilescu, M. D., & Ionel, I. (2017). 3D Printer FABLAB for Students at POLITEHNICA University Timisoara. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 512–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.106 Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748 Vickers, M. (2005). Action research to improve the human condition: An insider-outsider and a multi-methodology design for actionable knowledge outcomes. International Journal of Action Research, 1(2), 190–218. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37009 von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=712763 Wagner, J., & Watch, D. (2017). Innovation spaces: The new design of work. https://www.brookings.edu/research/innovation-spaces-the-new-design-of-work/ Wang, S.-M. S., & Yeh, P. C. (2018). Smart space and service management with IoT architecture - An application in educational context. 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-18 Ward, M., Gruppen, L., & Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014585522084 Wascher, E., Hebel, F., Schrot, K., & Schultze, J. (2018). Social Innovation Labs - A starting point for social innovation. https://kommunen-innovativ.de/sites/default/files/kosilab_report_social_innovation_labs_final.pdf Wascher, E., Kaletka, C., & Schultze, J. (2019). Social Innovation Labs - A Seedbed for Social Innovation. In Atlas of social innovation: 2nd volume - A world of new practices (pp. 136–138). https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/articles/ Weick, K. E. (1977). Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations: A Reappraisal. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409180 Westley, F., Laban, S., Rose, C., McGowan, K., Robinson, K., Tjornbo, O., & Tovey, M. (2015). Social Innovation Lab Guide. https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovationand-resilience/projects/social-innovation-lab-guide Wettergreen, M. A., Saterbak, A., Kavalewitz, A. J., Nunez-Thompson, A. M., Leautaud, V.,Mkandawire, T., Petney, M., dos Santos, C. A., & Oden, Z. M. (2020). Makerspaces in low-, middle-, and high-income countries to support student development of engineering design skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1234–1251. Wilson, I. (1992). Realizing the power of strategic vision. Long Range Planning, 25(5), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90271-3 Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517 Woods, R., & Berker, T. (2019). Living labs in a zero emission neighbourhood context. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 352(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012004 XU, L., HU, W., & GUAN, X. (2018). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Chinese Makerspace Operation Based on Double-creation Background. 2018 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2018-August, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2018.8745260 Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (L. Bickman & D. J. Rog, Eds.; 4th ed., Vol. 5). SAGE. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods (Sixth). Sage publications. https://www.sagepub.com/hi/nam/case-study-research-andapplications/book250150 You, W., Chen, W., Agyapong, M., & Mordi, C. (2020). The business model of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) laboratories – A triple-layered perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120205 Zamiri, M., Marcelino-Jesus, E., Calado, J., Sarraipa, J., & Goncalves, R. J. (2019). Knowledge Management in Research Collaboration Networks. 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948162 Zenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12459. https://doi.org/10.1111/CAIM.12459 Zivkovic, S. (2018). Systemic innovation labs: a lab for wicked problems. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(3), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-04-2018-0036 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
xxi, 253 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones |
| dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ingeniería |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/1/1098655581.2021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/2/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/3/1098655581.2021.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3a0bc85a4698de5d31b113a34ef632d5 8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2 cb8a883e652537fde7213f1ada13965f |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814089605624889344 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Peña Reyes, José Ismael481dd08c860416654ca167c7b5ab88edCamargo, Mauricio92bf742755c81d6fec4a48a6c36de79fDupont, Laurent1406ea23f15d58cd9ef9716bb7928467Osorio Bustamante, Ferney7a8c0e74641efc7363470d5c37e8f046Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic2022-02-22T20:56:42Z2022-02-22T20:56:42Z2021https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81040Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, graficasSince several years now, there has been a proliferation of prodigious spaces for fostering creativity and innovation. Governments, companies, universities, and communities have turned to the implementation of innovation labs as the places where innovation processes are expected to be enhanced through open and agile forms of collaboration. However, there are concerns on how the lack of a clear and shared strategic intent undermines the innovation labs’ purpose and how these initiatives struggle to share and align their strategic intent with all the stakeholders. Thus, this dissertation, following an action research approach under multiple research settings, aims to explain how the strategic intent of innovation labs is built and can be used to guide their performance. Throughout this thesis, innovation labs are recognized as intermediary organizational forms created to support and facilitate the innovation intent in multi-stakeholder contexts. Moreover, it is also addressed how innovation lab settings require sensemaking and feedback processes that allow them to create and maintain a strategic alignment among their stakeholders. Accordingly, this work focuses on the design of mechanisms that enable (1) the representation of the constituent elements of the organizational strategic intent of an innovation lab, (2) understanding how this intent unfolds over time and the stages it goes through, and (3) the identification of competences and roles within innovation lab teams that help to navigate the innovation lab intent. Altogether, they constitute a methodological approach to support strategy making processes in such collaborative environments.Desde hace varios años ha habido una fuerte emergencia de lugares predilectos para fomentar la creatividad y la innovación. Gobiernos, empresas, universidades y comunidades están optando cada vez más por la creación de laboratorios de innovación con el objetivo de facilitar los procesos de innovación mediante formas de colaboración abiertas y ágiles. Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de cómo la falta de una intención estratégica clara y compartida afecta al propósito de los laboratorios de innovación y cómo estas iniciativas luchan para lograr una intención estratégica compartida y alineada con todas las partes interesadas. Siguiendo un enfoque de investigación-acción con varios escenarios de investigación, esta tesis busca explicar cómo se construye la intención estratégica de los laboratorios de innovación y cómo puede utilizarse para guiar el funcionamiento de estos laboratorios. En esta tesis, los laboratorios de innovación se reconocen como formas organizativas intermediarias creadas para apoyar y facilitar la intención de innovación en contextos de múltiples partes interesadas. Además, también se aborda cómo la gestión de los laboratorios de innovación requiere procesos de creación de sentido y retroalimentación que les permitan crear y mantener una alineación estratégica entre sus partes interesadas. En consecuencia, este trabajo se centra en el diseño de mecanismos que permitan (1) la representación de los elementos constitutivos de la intención estratégica organizativa de un laboratorio de innovación, (2) la comprensión de cómo evoluciona esta intención a lo largo del tiempo y las etapas por las que esta pasa, y (3) la identificación de competencias y roles dentro de los equipos de los laboratorios de innovación que ayudan a navegar la intención del laboratorio de innovación. Estos resultados en su conjunto constituyen un enfoque metodológico para apoyar los procesos de elaboración de estrategias en estos entornos de colaboración. (Texto tomado de la fuente)Depuis plusieurs années, les espaces propices à la créativité et à l'innovation se multiplient. Les gouvernements, les entreprises, les universités et les communautés se sont tournés vers la mise en place de laboratoires d'innovation comme lieux où les processus d'innovation sont censés être améliorés par des formes de collaboration ouvertes et agiles. Cependant, il existe des préoccupations concernant le fait que l’absence d'une intention stratégique claire et partagée fragilise la finalité des laboratoires d'innovation et que ces initiatives peinent à faire converger et à partager leur intention stratégique avec toutes les parties prenantes. Par conséquent, cette thèse, en suivant une approche de rechercheaction dans plusieurs contextes de recherche, vise à expliquer comment l’intention stratégique des laboratoires d’innovation est construite et peut être utilisée pour guider leur performance. Dans cette recherche, les laboratoires d’innovation sont reconnus comme des formes organisationnelles intermédiaires créées pour soutenir et faciliter l’intention d’innovation dans des contextes multi-acteurs. En outre, il est également abordé la manière dont les laboratoires d'innovation requièrent des processus de prise de conscience et de restitution qui leur permettent de créer et de maintenir un alignement stratégique parmi leurs parties prenantes. En conséquence, ce travail se concentre sur la conception d’outils qui permettent (1) de représenter les éléments constitutifs de l’intention stratégique organisationnelle d’un laboratoire d’innovation, (2) de comprendre comment cette intention se déploie dans le temps et les étapes qu’elle traverse, et (3) d’identifier les compétences et les rôles au sein des équipes du laboratoire d’innovation contribuant à guider l’intention du laboratoire d’innovation. L'ensemble de ces résultats constitue une approche méthodologique pour accompagner les processus de conception de stratégies au sein des espaces collaboratifs.DoctoradoDoctor en Ingenieríaxxi, 253 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y OrganizacionesDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e IndustrialFacultad de IngenieríaBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá720 - Arquitectura::727 - Edificios para educación e investigaciónInnovation labStrategic intentStrategic managementMulti-case studyAction researchAssessmentLaboratorio de innovaciónIntención estratégicaGestión estratégicaEstudio de casos múltiplesInvestigación-acciónEvaluaciónLaboratoire d'innovationIntention stratégiqueGestion stratégiqueÉtude de cas multiplesRecherche-actionÉvaluationLaboratorio de investigaciónResearch laboratoriesInstalación científicaCentro de investigaciónManagement of innovation laboratories: An enabling methodological approach for strategic intention designGestion des laboratoires d’innovation : Une approche méthodologique pour la conception de l’intention stratégiqueGestión de laboratorios de innovación: Un enfoque metodológico orientado al diseño de la intención estratégicaTrabajo de grado - Doctoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDAcevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: The contribution of public innovation labs. In Technical Note. https://publications.iadb.org/en/innovationbetter-management-contribution-public-innovation-labsAgogué, M., Berthet, E., Fredberg, T., le Masson, P., Segrestin, B., Stoetzel, M., Wiener, M., & Yström, A. (2017). Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005Aguilar, M. G. S., Rosillo, V. M. L., Perez, C. O. M., Arellano, Ma. R. M., Ramirez, J. R. B., & Trejo, J. A. O. (2019). Analysis of Wastewater Production to Implement Circular Economy Solutions in a Smart Cities University Campus Living Lab. 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071711Ahmad, T., Ahmad, S., Jamshed, M., Sherwani, F. K., Ali, R., Khan, W., Nomani, A., & Qaisar, T. M. (2017). An ISM approach for analyzing the enablers in India’s makerspace platforms. 2017 Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) - The MakerSpace: From Imagining to Making!, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/LT.2017.8088121Allen, J. P., & van der Velden, R. K. W. (2005). The role of self-assessment in measuring skills (No. 2; REFLEX Working Paper Series). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153922219Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167. http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdfAmenta, L., Attademo, A., Remøy, H., Berruti, G., Cerreta, M., Formato, E., Palestino, M. F., & Russo, M. (2019). Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach. Urban Planning, 4(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170Andersen, E. S., & Jessen, S. A. (2003). Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00088-1Annett, M., Grossman, T., Wigdor, D., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2019). Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301420Apolitical. (2019, February). Public innovation labs around the world are closing — here’s why. The Future of Government. https://apolitical.co/solution_article/public-innovation-labsaround-the-world-are-closing-heres-why/Appelo, J. (2011). Management 3.0 : leading Agile developers, developing Agile leaders. Addison Wesley.Arciniegas, G., Šileryté, R., Dąbrowski, M., Wandl, A., Dukai, B., Bohnet, M., & Gutsche, J.-M. (2019). A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning. Urban Planning, 4(3), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2173Argyris, C. (1977, September). Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 115–125. https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations Argyris,C. (2002). Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509400Arnould, M., Morel, L., & Fournier, M. (2020). Developing a territorial diagnostic as part of a living lab process: Implementation to improve management and wood mobilization in small French private forest. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198373Badilescu-Buga, E. (2013). Knowledge behaviour and social adoption of innovation. Information Processing and Management, 49(4), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.02.001Baedeker, C., Piwowar, J., Themann, P., Grinewitschus, V., Krisemendt, B., Lepper, K., Zimmer, C., & von Geibler, J. (2020). Interactive Design to Encourage Energy Efficiency in Offices: Developing and Testing a User-Centered Building Management System Based on a Living Lab Approach. Sustainability, 12(17), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176956Bartelt, V. L., Urbaczewski, A., Mueller, A. G., & Sarker, S. (2020). Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: a social capital perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1762127Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 1996 11:3, 11(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289Beel, J., Aizawa, A., Breitinger, C., & Gipp, B. (2017). Mr. DLib: Recommendations-as-a-Service (RaaS) for Academia. 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991606Beel, J., Collins, A., Kopp, O., Dietz, L. W., & Knoth, P. (2019). Online Evaluations for Everyone: Mr. DLib’s Living Lab for Scholarly Recommendations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11438 LNCS (pp. 213–219). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_27Belbin, R. M. (2010). Team roles at work, second edition. In Team Roles at Work, Second Edition (Second). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080963242Benabbas, A., & Nicklas, D. (2019). Quality-Aware Sensor Data Stream Management in a Living Lab Environment. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730858Björklund, T., Keipi, T., Celik, S., & Ekman, K. (2019). Learning across silos: Design Factories as hubs for co‐creation. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12372Björklund, T., Laakso, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Ekman, K. (2017). Passion-based co-creation. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/29068Björklund, T., Luukkonen, S., Clavert, M., Kirjavainen, S., & Laakso, M. (2011). Aalto University Design Factory through the eyes of its community members. Aalto University Design Factory. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/12171Blok, V. (2021). What Is Innovation?: Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/TECHNE2020109129Bloom, L., & Faulkner, R. (2016). Innovation spaces: lessons from the United Nations. Third World Quarterly, 37(8), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1135730Boeri, A., Longo, D., Gianfrate, V., & Lorenzo, V. (2017). Resilient Communities. Social Infrastructures for Sustainable Growth of Urban Areas. A Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(02), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N2-227-237Böhm, K., & Paul, C. (2019). “CoMod” A Model to Support Collaboration and Innovation Between Digital Innovation Labs and SMEs. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 1, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.34190/KM.19.066Boly, V., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2016). Ingénierie de l’Innovation (3e Édition). Lavoisier, Hermès. https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/economie/ingenierie-de-l-innovation-et-projetsinnovants-3e-ed/boly/descriptif-9782746247475Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Brem, A. (2019). Permeability in Coworking-Spaces as an Innovation Facilitator. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893737Bousbiat, H., Klemenjak, C., Leitner, G., & Elmenreich, W. (2020). Augmenting an Assisted Living Lab with Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring. 2020 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128406Bradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (H. Bradbury, Ed.; Third). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research/book242797Breytenbach, J., & Kariem, I. (2020). A Living Labs Approach to Manage Co-created Design Knowledge through Ideation Artefacts. 2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIM49319.2020.245373Brock, K. L. (2020). Government and Non-profit Collaboration in Times of Deliverology, Policy Innovation Laboratories and Hubs, and New Public Governance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0Burgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (1996). Strategic Dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165830Caccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12357. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil.Camargo, M., Morel, L., & Lhoste, P. (2021). Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership. In D. Mietzner & C. Schultz (Eds.), New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. (1st ed., pp. 181–205). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_11Capdevila, I. (2013). Typologies of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, January, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414402Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering Collaborative Policy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help? The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–25. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2986463431/poweringcollaborative-policy-innovation-can-innovationCarter, K., Morgan, E., Webb, L., Goddard, N., & Webb, J. (2017). Enhance: The assembly rooms energy living lab. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 669–676.Chatenier, E. du, Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R and D Management, 40(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.xChesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.Chessa, S., Girolami, M., Foschini, L., Ianniello, R., Corradi, A., & Bellavista, P. (2017). Mobile crowd sensing management with the ParticipAct living lab. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 38, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.09.005Christensen, M. H., Li, R., & Pinson, P. (2020). Demand side management of heat in Smart homes: Living-lab experiments. Energy, 195, 116993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116993Claire, J., Galvez, D., Boly, V., Camargo, M., & Moselle, J. C. (2014). A new innovation Project maturity assessment methodology based on innovation degree. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871614Corsini, L., Dammicco, V., & Moultrie, J. (2020). Frugal innovation in a crisis: the digital fabrication maker response to COVID‐19. R&D Management, radm.12446. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12446Crippa, D., & di Prete, B. (2019). Towards a Digital Healthcare Revolution Views and Researches of the Milanese FabLab Community. In T. S., M. B., K. W., D. N. M., & R. E. (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 793, pp. 214–223). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_20Dalziel, M. (2010). Why do innovation intermediaries exist. DRUID Summer Conference 2010 on Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Innovation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228855626_Why_do_innovation_intermediaries_existDeCusatis, C. (2008). Creating, Growing and Sustaining Efficient Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00478.xdel Vecchio, P., Elia, G., Ndou, V., Secundo, G., & Specchia, F. (2017). Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(05), 1750024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500249Delgado, L., Galvez, D., Hassan, A., Palominos, P., & Morel, L. (2020). Innovation Spaces in Universities: Support for Collaborative Learning. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 31(1), 123–153. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0064Deng, J. (2018). Exploration of building and running open labs in application-technology universities. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.26802/jaots.2018.10834Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). SUSTAINED PRODUCT INNOVATION IN LARGE, MATURE ORGANIZATIONS: OVERCOMING INNOVATION-TO-ORGANIZATION PROBLEMS. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. https://doi.org/10.2307/256994Drew, K. (2017). Our Innovation Labs are dead. Long live innovation! UNHCR Innovation. https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/our-innovation-labs-are-dead-long-live-innovation/Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1986). Five steps from novice to expert. In Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (p. 231). Free Press.Dupont, L. (2009). Transfert du génie industriel vers l’ingénierie urbaine : vers une aproche collaborative des projets urbains [Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine - INPL]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00734950/Dupont, L. (2019). Agile innovation: Creating value in uncertain environments. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0001Dupont, L., Gabriel, A., Camargo, M., & Guidat, C. (2017). Collaborative innovation projects engaging open communities: A case study on emerging challenges. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280002Dupont, L., Guidat, C., Morel, L., & Skiba, N. (2016). The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference, ICE/ITMC 2015, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438669Dupont, L., Mastelic, J., Nyffeler, N., Latrille, S., & Seulliet, E. (2019). Living lab as a support to trust for co-creation of value: application to the consumer energy market. Journal of Innovation Economics, 28(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.028.0053Dupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2015). Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of “Chaire REVES.” Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 245– 265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027Dupont, L., Morel, L., Hubert, J., & Guidat, C. (2014). Study case: Living Lab Mode for urban project design: Emergence of an ad hoc methodology through collaborative innovation. 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871550Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888Ekvall, G. (1997). Organizational Conditions and Levels of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00070Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-zEl-Namaki, M. S. S. (1992). Creating a corporate vision. Long Range Planning, 25(6), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90166-YEnjolras, M. (2016). Méthodologie d’analyse de la capacité à innover et à exporter des PME manufacturières et de procédés : identification et caractérisation d’un espace commun en vue de l’élaboration d’un outil multicritères d’aide à la décision [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2016LORR0149Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., & Schmitt, C. (2020). Evaluating Innovation and Export Capabilities of SMEs: Toward a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(3), 17–32. https://173.236.245.237/index.php/GT/article/view/3440Espinosa, J. M. M., Miranda, J., Cortés, D., Medina, J., & Molina, A. (2020). 3D Virtual Environments to Support New Product Development: A Mobile Platform Based on an Open Innovation Laboratory Applied in Higher Education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 12015 LNCS (pp. 483–496). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54407-2_41Fecher, F., Winding, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2020). Innovation labs from a participants’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 110, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.039Finocchiaro, L., & Wågø, S. I. (2017). Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: An analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living Lab in Trondheim. Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, 1, 216–223.Fitzpatrick, G., & Malmborg, L. (2018). Quadruple helix model organisation and tensions in participatory design teams. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240191Fonteijn, R., Roos, M. H., Nguyen, P. H., Morren, J., & Slootweg, J. G. (2018). The Strijp-S living-lab: testing innovative solutions for fault protection, self-healing, congestion management, and voltage control. 2018 53rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2018.8542117Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104390Fuller, M. (2017). Fitting squares into round holes: Enabling innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship through corporate Fab labs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2(DS87-2), 407–416. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/39595/Fitting+squares+into+round+holes%3A+Enabling+innovation%2C+creativity%2C+and+entrepreneurship+through+corporate+Fab+LabsGallegos-Segovia, P. L., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., Vintimilla-Tapia, P. E.,Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Arevalo-Cordero, S. J., Bravo-Torres, J. F., Yuquilima-Albarado, I. F., Larios-Rosillo, V. M., & Arévalo-Cordero, S. J. (2017). Living lab concept for cloud analysis in networks of metropolitan sensors applying the concept of SD-WAN and hybrid networks. 2017 CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), 2017-Janua, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHILECON.2017.8229520Galvez Manriquez, D. (2015). Évaluation de la capacité à innover : une approche par auto évaluation et suivi supporté par des analyses multicritères dynamiques [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2015LORR0018#Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: a literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205.Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029Geist, M. J., Sanders, R., Harris, K., Arce-Trigatti, A., & Hitchcock-Cass, C. (2019). Clinical Immersion: An Approach for Fostering Cross-disciplinary Communication and Innovation in Nursing and Engineering Students. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000547Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00451.xGey, R., Meyer, L. P., & Thieme, M. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon Innovation Laboratory: A Structurational Viewpoint. XXIII International RESER Conference, 1–17.Gingstad, K., Jekteberg, Ø., & Balog, K. (2020). ArXivDigest: A Living Lab for Personalized Scientific Literature Recommendation. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 3393–3396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3417417Giones, F., Kleine, K., & Tegtmeier, S. (2021). Students as scientists’ co-pilots at the onset of technology transfer: a two-way learning process. The Journal of Technology Transfer 2021, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-021-09880-3Goduscheit, R. C. (2014). Innovation promoters - A multiple case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.020Goncalves, G. M., Meneses, R., Faria, J. P., & Vidal, R. M. (2020). A living lab for profesional skills development in Software Engineering Management at U.Porto. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2020-April, 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125099Gratton, L. (1994). Implementing Strategic Intent: Human Resource Processes as a Force for Change. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8616.1994.tb00069.xGregoire, M. (2016). Exploring various approaches of social innovation: a francophone literature review and a proposal of innovation typology. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p45-71GREVE, K., LEMINEN, S., de VITA, R., & WESTERLUND, M. (2020). UNVEILING THE DIVERSITY OF SCHOLARLY DEBATE ON LIVING LABS: A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(08), 2040003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620400034Gross, E. (1969). The Definition of Organizational Goals. The British Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/588953Gryszkiewicz, L., Lykourentzou, I., & Toivonen, T. (2016). Innovation Labs: Leveraging Openness for Radical Innovation? Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 68–97. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2556692Günzel, H., Brehm, L., Haak, H.-J., Grönvall, M., & Sainio, A.-M. (2019). DI2 Co-Innovation Lab: Teaching software development in and for real business situations. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference on ZZZ, 116–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375273Habibipour, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Georges, A., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Schuurman, D. (2018). Drop-out in living lab field test: Analysing consequences and some recommendations. 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of SocioTechnical Change, ECIS 2018. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061326020&partnerID=40&md5=15da586a69e94b820681020a92de96d8Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (2005, July). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2005/07/strategic-intentHart, S. L. (1992). An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279547Hawkins, N., Lewis, J. E., & Robinson, B. S. (2020). Employment of active learning pedagogy throughout a makerspace-based, first-year introduction to engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095745666&partnerID=40&md5=4c71949ca04b6a8ef6126a85201bf6f4Hellström, T., Jacob, M., & Malmquist, U. (2002). Guiding innovation socially and cognitively: the innovation team model at Skanova Networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210436745Henike, T., Kamprath, M., & Hölzle, K. (2019). Effecting, but effective? How business model visualisations unfold cognitive impacts. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101925Hering, D., & Phillips, J. (2005). Innovation Roles The People You Need for Successful Innovation (White Paper).Herrera, N. R., Davis-Owusu, K., van Oers, S., de Van Der Schueren, M., Alberts, J., & Vastenburg, M. (2018). FoodSampler: Engaging people to contextualise food behaviour: Mixed methods for monitoring choices and triggers of eating habits. Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240948Herron, J., & Kaneshiro, K. (2017). A University-Wide Collaborative Effort to Designing a Makerspace at an Academic Health Sciences Library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1259878Holm, E. J. van. (2015). Makerspaces and Contributions to Entrepreneurship. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005Hugo, H., Espinoza, F., Morales, I., Ortiz, E., Pérez, S., & Salcedo, G. (2018). Delta project: Towards a sustainable campus. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103695Hund, A., Holotiuk, F., Wagner, H.-T., & Beimborn, D. (2020). Knowledge management in the digital era: How digital innovation labs facilitate knowledge recombination. 27th European Conference on Information Systems - Information Systems for a Sharing Society, ECIS 2019. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85087105146&partnerID=40&md5=9db4f82fd613d44870efc50183605dd0Innov8rs Team. (2017). Innovation Labs: Flying, or Failing? Innova8rs.Co. https://innov8rs.co/news/innovation-labs-flying-failing/ISO. (2019). Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance (ISO Standard No. 56002). https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.htmlJenssen, J. I., & Jørgensen, G. (2004). How do Corporate Champions promote innovations? International Journal of Innovation Management, 08(01), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919604000964Jezierski, E., Harvey, J., Hansen, L., Takeuchi, M., Sinha, R., Kieboom, K. M. M., & Edwards, D. (2014). Labcraft: How Social Labs Cultivate Change Through Innovation and Collaboration. Labcraft Publishing. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/labcraft-innovationlabs-cultivate-change/Jin, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, J. (2020). Efficiency and influencing factors of crowd innovation spaces in China. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Information Systems (IS) for the Future, PACIS 2020. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089128052&partnerID=40&md5=c6beb47961e4151fb7ca1c201b7d8b5fJin, Z. R., & Qiu, A. Z. (2019). Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Testbed as an Integrated Approach for New Mobility - A Living Lab Case Study in Singapore. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 11596 LNCS (pp. 441–458). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_32Jukema, J. S., Veerman, M., van Alphen, J., Visser, G., Smits, C., & Kingma, T. (2019). Nurturing gerontology students’ intrinsic motivation to cocreate: The design of a powerful learning environment. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 40(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2017.1377702Kaar, C., & Stary, C. (2020). Empowering Makers – A Design Science Approach. 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology Management, PartF168981, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446590.3446606Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity – a longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09- 2013-0074Kant, M., & Kanda, W. (2019). Innovation intermediaries: What does it take to survive over time? Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.04.213Kasmi, F., Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Marche, B., & Camargo, M. (2021). Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, Prépublication(0), I113-42. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0113Katzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., & Sailer, K. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764982Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2005). The ten faces of innovation : IDEO’s strategies for beating the devil’s advocate & driving creativity throughout your organization. Currency/Doubleday.Kieboom, M., van Exel, T., & Sigaloff, C. (2015). Lab Practice: creating spaces for social change. https://www.kl.nl/en/publications/lab-practice-creating-spaces-for-social-change/Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006Klautzer, L., Hong, S. Y., & Narayan, R. (2020). More than a thought experiment -- conceptualizing and implementing an Urban Living Lab. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(3), 032019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032019Klooker, M., Matzdorf, S., Nicolai, C., Boettcher, L., & Trost, A. (2015). The Importance of Strategic Intent in Developing Innovation Space. ISPIM Innovation Symposium. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), December, 1–19. https://search.proquest.com/openview/aafe571adc2facc4649c96ee12298f3c/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2040562Klooker, M., Schwemmle, M., Nicolai, C., & Weinberg, U. (2019). Making Use of Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework of Strategizing Spatial Interventions. In C. Meinel & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research : Looking Further: Design Thinking Beyond Solution-Fixation (pp. 75–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97082-0_5Knoll Workplace Research. (2013). Creating Collaborative Spaces that Work. https://www.knoll.com/document/1352994554274/CollaborativeWorkplace_wp.pdfKohtala, C. (2018). Makerspaces as free experimental zones. In M. Charter (Ed.), Designing for the Circular Economy (1st Edition, pp. 260–269). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113067-24Kratzer, J., Leenders, O. T. A. J., & Engelen, J. M. L. van. (2004). Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.xKratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006a). Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation, 26(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.016Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006b). Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00372.xKristensen, T. (2004). The Physical Context of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.xLaakso, M., & Clavert, M. (2014). Promover la creatividad y las habilidades del pensamiento de diseño entre los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 104, 215–228. https://research.aalto.fi/fi/publications/promover-la-creatividad-y-las-habilidades-delpensamiento-de-diseLacroix, J., Dupont, L., Guidat, C., & Loterr, G. H. (2017). “Smarterized” urban project process with living lab approach: Exploration through a case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279939Lake, D., Fernando, H., & Eardley, D. (2016). The social lab classroom: Wrestling with—and learning from—sustainability challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 12(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908155Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248le Dinh, T., Ayayi, A., Vu, M. C., & Nomo, T. S. (2018). Managing co-creation rojects: The service-oriented perspective. Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(3), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.19255/jmpm324Leicher, A. (2017). The rise and death of corporate innovation labs. Hacker Noon. https://hackernoon.com/the-rise-and-death-of-corporate-innovation-labs-6139b9000d40Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. (2019). Innovation Mechanism(s) in ThirdGeneration Living Labs: Towards Unification of Collaborative Innovation Networks. ISPIMConference Proceedings, 1–24. https://search.proquest.com/openview/cb5f04c12b7b8fba355bbac3c25a1ff8/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=1796422Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School. http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990060514740203941/catalogLépine, V., & Martin-Juchat, F. (2020). Enjeux communicationnels des recherches partenariales dans le contexte des open labs. Http://Journals.Openedition.Org/Communiquer, 30, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.4000/COMMUNIQUER.7396Lewis, J. M. (2020). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The Organizational Innovation Laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00327.xLin, Q., & Wong, S. (2017). A study of intellectual property protection for mass innovation spaces. 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 973–975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988606Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<875::AIDSMJ126>3.0.CO;2-PMagadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00540.xMaier, A. M., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012). Assessing Organizational Capabilities: Reviewing and Guiding the Development of Maturity Grids. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2077289Mantere, S., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). Strategic intent as a rhetorical device. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.03.002Mao, C. (2020). Research on The Application of Blockchain Technology in The Construction and Management of Smart Laboratory. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering, PartF168986, 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452940.3453067Marantos, C., Paraskevas, I. S., Siozios, K., Mothe, J., Menou, C., & Soudris, D. (2017). FabSpace 2.0: A platform for application and service development based on Earth Observation data. 2017 6th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2017.7937657Maravilhas, S., & Martins, J. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061Mariadoss, B. J., Johnson, J. L., & Martin, K. D. (2014). Strategic intent and performance: The role of resource allocation decisions. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2393–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.006Markopoulos, E., Aggarwal, V., & Vanharanta, H. (2020). Democratization of Intrapreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship Within the McKinsey’s Three Horizons Innovation Space. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1026, pp. 1007–1017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_150Mastelic, J., Emery, L., Previdoli, D., Papilloud, L., Cimmino, F., & Genoud, S. (2018). Energy management in a public building: A case study co-designing the building energy management system. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2018-Janua, 1517–1523. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280062Mburu, S. N., & Thuo, J. K. (2015). Understanding the Concept of Strategic Intent. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(6), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss6.384McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2019). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946Memon, A. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Towards the Functional Roles of an Innovation Laboratory as a Platform for Innovation: An Observational Approach. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.2017010103Memon, A. B., Meyer, K., Thieme, M., & Meyer, L.-P. (2018). Inter-InnoLab collaboration: An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among Innovation Laboratories. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.003Memon, A. B., Meyer, K., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Toward collaborative networking among innovation laboratories: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2021-0069Mérindol, V., Bouquin, N., Versailles, D. W., Capdevila, I., Aubouin, N., le Chaffotec, A., Chiovetta, A., & Voisin, T. (2016). Le livre blanc des open labs : Quelles pratiques ? Quels changements en France. Futuris ANRT-NEWPIC. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27107.96806Mérindol, V., Gallié, E. P., & Capdevila, I. (2018). Technology-transfer offices and academic open labs as different types of organizational intermediaries in science-society relationships. Gestion 2000, 35(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3917/G2000.352.0125Metzlar, A. (2017). Strategic intent and the strategic position of smallholders: a case study of a smallholders’ organization in the Ghanaian cocoa industry. Review of Social Economy, 75(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2017.1299202Midwood, A. J., Hannam, K. D., Forge, T. A., Neilsen, D., Emde, D., & Jones, M. D. (2020). Importance of drive-row vegetation for soil carbon storage in woody perennial crops: A regional study. Geoderma, 377, 114591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114591Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/miles3eMingers, J. (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (1st ed.). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29841-XMingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2Miranda, J., Chavarria-Barrientos, D., Macias, M., Molina, M., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. K. (2018). Experiences in interactive collaborative learning using an open innovation laboratory: The design methodologies course as case study. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering, Technology and Innovation Management Beyond 2020: New Challenges, New Approaches, ICE/ITMC 2017 - Proceedings, 2018-Janua, 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280021Mochizuki, Y. (2018). Global perspective for data-leveraged smart city initiatives. NEC Technical Journal, 13(1), 14–18. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059419834&partnerID=40&md5=ca17914898f2e7b2d7edf505748c9968Moilanen, J. (2012). Emerging hackerspaces - Peer-production generation. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 378 AICT, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7Morel, L., Dupont, L., & Boudarel, M.-R. (2018). Innovation spaces: new places for collective intelligence? In D. Uzunidis (Ed.), Collective Innovation Processes (Volume 4, pp. 87–107). Wiley-ISTE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119557883.ch5Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202Mortara, L., & Parisot, N. (2018). How do fab-spaces enable entrepreneurship? Case studies of “makers” - entrepreneurs. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 32(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2018.089465Mortara, L., & Parisot, N. G. (2016). Through entrepreneurs’ eyes: the Fab-spaces constellation. International Journal of Production Research, 54(23), 7158–7180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1198505Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2006). A tool to evaluate design performance in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 184–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610653192Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J., & Probert, D. (2007). Development of a design audit tool for SMEs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00255.xMoultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U.-E., Janssen, S., & van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.xMoya Sedan, C. A. (2021). Développement de la capacité à open innover des fournisseurs [Université de Lorraine]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2021LORR0006Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of Professional Competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning (pp. 107–137). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5Nilsson, W., Bonnici, F., & Griffin EL, E. W. (2015). The social innovation lab: An experiment in the pedagogy of institutional work. In The Business of Social and Environmental Innovation: New Frontiers in Africa (pp. 201–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04051-6_11Nur Rahma Putra, A. B., Mukhadis, A., Poerwanto, E. E., Irdianto, W., & Sembiring, A. I. (2018). Edmodo-Based Makerspace as E-Learning Technology to Improve the Management Project of Vocational Students in the Disruptive Technology Era. 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIET.2018.8693224Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016OECD. (2018). Digital Government Review of Colombia: Towards a Citizen-Driven Public Sector. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264291867-enOksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136Oladele-Emmanuel, B. D., Rejeb, H. ben, & Redlich, T. (2018). Strategic Management: SWOT Analysis of the African Digital Fabrication Laboratories. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436269Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place: Inspiring stories about the great good places at the heart of our communities. Da Capo Press.Oliva, F. L., & Kotabe, M. (2019). Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1838–1856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0361Olson, E. M., Cooper, R., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(98)90035-0Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.423O’Shannassy, T. F. (2016). Strategic intent: The literature, the construct and its role in predicting organization performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(5), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.46Osorio Bustamante, F. (2015). Analysis of characteristics and types of infrastructure of innovation laboratories: implications for strategic management. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/59004Osorio Bustamante, F., Pena Reyes, J. I., Camargo, M., & Dupont, L. (2016). Spaces to Foster and sustain innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438661Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Pena, J. I. (2019). Constellation of Innovation Laboratories: A Scientific Outlook. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792816Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Peña, J. I. (2021). Making the strategic intent of innovation labs operational: A process perspective on the case of the Lorraine Fab Living Lab. R&D Management Conference 2021 Innovation in an Era of Disruption, 1–13. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03285670Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Peña, J. I. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n°31(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0066Paje, R. C., Boco, L. B., Gloria, J. C. A., & Go, H. A. R. (2020). The Effect of Workplace Design on Employee Engagement, Collaborative Capability, and on Perceived Work Performance in Coworking Spaces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(3), 032063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032063Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2015). Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 6(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Hatzichristos, T. (2020). Allocation of Residential Areas in Smart Insular Communities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(4), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020100103Patterson, B., Casucci, T., Hull, B. E., & Lombardo, N. T. (2018). Library as the Technology Hub for the Health Sciences. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1514899Patterson, M. G., Godon, C. H., Segan, L. D., & Mannickarottu, S. (2020). Under the hood of a bio-makerspace: Automating lab operations. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June.Pearce II, J. A. (1982). The Company Mission As a Strategic Tool: What Is - ProQuest. Sloan Management Review (Pre-1986), 23(3). https://www.proquest.com/docview/206766548Peña-Reyes, J.-I. (2010). E-learning en communautés isolées : le double isolement de l’apprenant [Grenoble]. In http://www.theses.fr. http://www.theses.fr/2010GRENG002Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 9(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.9.1.41_1Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014). Designing and Enabling Spaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation: From managing to enabling innovation as socioepistemological technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.027Petersen, I. haam, & Kruss, G. (2021). Universities as change agents in resource-poor local settings: An empirically grounded typology of engagement models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120693Pham, T. v., Nguyen, A. T. T., Ngo, T. D., Le, D. H., Le, K. C. V., Nguyen, T. H. N., & Le, H. Q. (2020). Proposed Smart University Model as a Sustainable Living Lab for University Digital Transformation. 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1109/GTSD50082.2020.9303086Pitt, M. (2001). In pursuit of change: managerial constructions of strategic intent. Strategic Change, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.528Pittaway, L., Aissaoui, R., Ferrier, M., & Mass, P. (2019). University spaces for entrepreneurship: a process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 911–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2018-0584Podmetina, D., Hafkesbrink, J., Teplov, R., Dabrowska, J., & Petraite, M. (2015). What Skills and Competences are required to Implement Open Innovation? ISPIM Conference Proceedings, June, 1–20. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1780140077/fulltext/11860BF316DB4B68PQ/1?accountid=14211Podmetina, D., Soderquist, K. E., Petraite, M., & Teplov, R. (2018). Developing a competency model for open innovation: From the individual to the organisational level. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0445Polderman, A., Haller, A., Viesi, D., Tabin, X., Sala, S., Giorgi, A., Darmayan, L., Rager, J., Vidovič, J., Daragon, Q., Verchère, Y., Zupan, U., Houbé, N., Heinrich, K., Bender, O., & Bidault, Y. (2020). How Can Ski Resorts Get Smart? Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainable Winter Tourism in the European Alps. Sustainability, 12(14), 5593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145593Ponsard, C., Nihoul, B., & Touzani, M. (2019). Software eco-design for sustainable systems: Experience feedback in mobility and forest management [Éco-conception logicielle pour systèmes durables: Retours d’expérience en matière de mobilité et de gestion forestière]. 37th INFORSID 2019 - INFormatique Des ORganisations et Systemes d’Information et de Decision, 115–130.Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. (1987). The Multinational Mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.Provenzano, V., Seminara, M. R., & Arnone, M. (2020). Sustainable Development and Transition Management: A New Approach for European Peripheral Areas. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies: Vol. 177 SIST (pp. 37–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52869-0_4Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/i-teamsthe-teams-and-funds-making-innovation-happen-in-governments-around-the-world/Quintane, E., Mitch Casselman, R., Sebastian Reiche, B., & Nylund, P. A. (2011). Innovation as a knowledge‐based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 928–947. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179299Raabe, J.-P., Horlach, B., Drews, P., & Schirmer, I. (2020). Digital innovation units: Exploring types, linking mechanisms and evolution strategies in bimodal it setups. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Business Information Systems 2020 “Developments, Opportunities and Challenges of Digitization”, WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 2020. https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_h5Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2019). Open social innovation dynamics and impact: exploratory study of a fab lab network. R and D Management, 49(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12376Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2021). Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120391Rezaee Vessal, S., Partouche-Sebban, J., Scuotto, V., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Overcoming stressful life events at do-it-yourself (DIY) laboratories. A new trailblazing career for disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120506Rieken, F., Boehm, T., Heinzen, M., & Meboldt, M. (2019). Corporate makerspaces as innovation driver in companies: a literature review-based framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0098Roberts, E. B., & Fusfeld, A. R. (1982). Critical functions: Needed roles in the innovation process. In R. Kats (Ed.), Carrer issues in human resource management (pp. 182–207). Prentice-Hall. https://books.google.fr/books/about/Career_issues_in_human_resource_manageme.html?id=4CYUAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=yRose, R., Groeger, L., & Hölzle, K. (2021). The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167Roux-Marchand, T., Cruz, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., & Osorio, F. (2020). Connecting the strategic intent of innovation labs and projects: the case of the Green Fablab. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198320Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556383Sandiford, P. J. (2019). The Third Place as an Evolving Concept for Hospitality Researchers and Managers. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 43(7), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019855687Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2017). Open innovation, living labs and public officials: The case of “mapaton” in Mexico. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047308Sangiorgi, D., Lucchi, F., & Carrera, M. (2020). Co-designing Innovation Labs as Engines for Mental Healthcare Ecosystem Transformation (pp. 209–223). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_15Santarsiero, F., Lerro, A., Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2021). Modelling and managing innovation lab as catalyst of digital transformation: theoretical and empirical evidence. Measuring Business Excellence, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE11-2020-0152Schaeffer, J. A. (2017). Already There? Cultivating Emergent Places for Radical Innovation in Operations. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Vol. 255, pp. 131–149). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55985-8_8Schmitt, U. (2017). Devising enabling spaces and affordances for personal knowledge management system design. Informing Science, 20, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.28945/3743Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., Kawsar, F., Seys, C., Veeckman, C., de Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Living labs as quasi-experiments: results from the Flemish LeYLab. XXIV ISPIM Conference : Innovating in Global Markets: Challenges for Sustainable Growth, 1–15. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/3237435/file/3237445.pdfSchuurman, D., Marez, L. de, & Ballon, P. (2013). Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1). http://timreview.ca/article/743Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2016). Innovation in the public sector : exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Proceedings of the OpenLivingLab Days 2016, Montreal, Canada, 78–90. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU8532627Searle, J. R. (1979). What Is an Intentional State? Mind, 88(349), 74–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253065 Seo, E., Bae, S., Choi, H., & Choi, D. (2020). Preference and usability of Smart-Home services and items - A Focus on the Smart-Home living-lab –. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1812397Seo, J., Lysiankova, L., Ock, Y.-S. Y.-S., & Chun, D. (2017). Priorities of coworking space operation based on comparison of the hosts and users’ perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081494Servaty, R., Perger, G., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2018). Working in a cocoon: (Co)working conditions of office nomads - a health related qualitative study of shared working environments. Work, 60(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182760Sharp, D., & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101699Sheehan Jr., R. M. (1999). Achieving Growth and High Quality by Strategic Intent. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.9406Siekkinen, T., Pekkola, E., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Change and continuity in the academic profession: Finnish universities as living labs. Higher Education, 79(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00422-3Sillince, J. A. A. (1999). The Role of Political Language Forms and Language Coherence in the Organizational Change Process. Organization Studies, 20(3), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699203005Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341Sittoni, L., van Eekelen, E. M. M., van der Goot, F., & Nieboer, H. E. (2019). The Living Lab for mud: Integrated sediment management based on building with nature concepts. 22nd World Dredging Congress, WODCON 2019, 847–856. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071455613&partnerID=40&md5=3d815b9f92cba0ad7770e5e6d453c6efSkiba, N., Dupont, L., Morel, L., & Guidat, C. (2012). A space for innovation process acceleration, supporting collaborative citizens workshops. 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297646Smith, C. E. (1994). The Merlin Factor: Leadership and Strategic Intent. Business Strategy Review, 5(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.1994.tb00070.xSnead, L., & Wycoff, J. (1999). TOOLS@ WORK: Stimulating innovation with collaboration rooms. Journal for Quality and Participation, 55–57.Song, R., Clemon, L., & Telenko, C. (2019). Uncertainty and Variability of Energy and Material Use by Fused Deposition Modeling Printers in Makerspaces. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(3), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12772Soomro, S. A., & Georgiev, G. v. (2020). A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE DIGITAL FABRICATION PROJECTS: THE ROLE OF DESIGN CREATIVITY. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2020), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.35199/ICDC.2020.46Sroufe, R. (2020). Business Schools as Living Labs: Advancing Sustainability in Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 726–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920951590Stercken, A. A. M. (2015). Cultivating Serendipity and Efficacy Beliefs: The Impact of (Caireen) Innovation Spaces on Human Development. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/305357Stickel, O., Stilz, M., Brocker, A., Borchers, J., & Pipek, V. (2019). Fab:UNIverse - Makerspaces, Fab Labs and Lab Managers in Academia. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference on ZZZ - FabLearn Europe ’19, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335074Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392581Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2Tasca, R., Ventura, I. L. S., Borges, V., Leles, F. A. G., Gomes, R. de M., Ribas, A. N., Carvalho, W. M., & Jimenez, J. M. S. (2019). Laboratórios de inovação em saúde: por uma Atenção Primária à Saúde forte no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24(6), 2021– 2030. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018246.08672019Ten, I., Arbelaez-Garces, G., & Dupont, L. (2020). Designing interactive museum visitors’ experience using a Fab Living Lab platform: The Museum-Aquarium of Nancy case. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2020, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198641Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsable research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939TURILLAZZI, B., LEONI, G., GASPARI, J., IADANZA, E., MY, M., MASSARI, M., BOULANGER, S. O. M., & DJALALI, A. (2020). HERITAGE-LED ONTOLOGIES: DIGITAL PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING THE REGENERATION OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL SITES. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 249, 307–318. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC200261Valencia, M., Villacreses, S., Benitez, D. S., Velasco, A., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2018). Towards a Sustainable Energy-Efficient Future at Universities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Case Study, Phase I. 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2018.8564629van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(03), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817Vasilescu, M. D., & Ionel, I. (2017). 3D Printer FABLAB for Students at POLITEHNICA University Timisoara. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 512–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.106Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748Vickers, M. (2005). Action research to improve the human condition: An insider-outsider and a multi-methodology design for actionable knowledge outcomes. International Journal of Action Research, 1(2), 190–218. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37009von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=712763Wagner, J., & Watch, D. (2017). Innovation spaces: The new design of work. https://www.brookings.edu/research/innovation-spaces-the-new-design-of-work/Wang, S.-M. S., & Yeh, P. C. (2018). Smart space and service management with IoT architecture - An application in educational context. 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-18Ward, M., Gruppen, L., & Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014585522084Wascher, E., Hebel, F., Schrot, K., & Schultze, J. (2018). Social Innovation Labs - A starting point for social innovation. https://kommunen-innovativ.de/sites/default/files/kosilab_report_social_innovation_labs_final.pdfWascher, E., Kaletka, C., & Schultze, J. (2019). Social Innovation Labs - A Seedbed for Social Innovation. In Atlas of social innovation: 2nd volume - A world of new practices (pp. 136–138). https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/articles/Weick, K. E. (1977). Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations: A Reappraisal. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409180Westley, F., Laban, S., Rose, C., McGowan, K., Robinson, K., Tjornbo, O., & Tovey, M. (2015). Social Innovation Lab Guide. https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovationand-resilience/projects/social-innovation-lab-guideWettergreen, M. A., Saterbak, A., Kavalewitz, A. J., Nunez-Thompson, A. M., Leautaud, V.,Mkandawire, T., Petney, M., dos Santos, C. A., & Oden, Z. M. (2020). Makerspaces in low-, middle-, and high-income countries to support student development of engineering design skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1234–1251.Wilson, I. (1992). Realizing the power of strategic vision. Long Range Planning, 25(5), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90271-3Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517Woods, R., & Berker, T. (2019). Living labs in a zero emission neighbourhood context. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 352(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012004XU, L., HU, W., & GUAN, X. (2018). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Chinese Makerspace Operation Based on Double-creation Background. 2018 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2018-August, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2018.8745260Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (L. Bickman & D. J. Rog, Eds.; 4th ed., Vol. 5). SAGE.Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: design and methods (Sixth). Sage publications. https://www.sagepub.com/hi/nam/case-study-research-andapplications/book250150You, W., Chen, W., Agyapong, M., & Mordi, C. (2020). The business model of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) laboratories – A triple-layered perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120205Zamiri, M., Marcelino-Jesus, E., Calado, J., Sarraipa, J., & Goncalves, R. J. (2019). Knowledge Management in Research Collaboration Networks. 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948162Zenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, caim.12459. https://doi.org/10.1111/CAIM.12459Zivkovic, S. (2018). Systemic innovation labs: a lab for wicked problems. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(3), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-04-2018-0036InvestigadoresPúblico generalORIGINAL1098655581.2021.pdf1098655581.2021.pdfTesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería Industria y organizacionesapplication/pdf8519287https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/1/1098655581.2021.pdf3a0bc85a4698de5d31b113a34ef632d5MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84074https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/2/license.txt8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2MD52THUMBNAIL1098655581.2021.pdf.jpg1098655581.2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6480https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81040/3/1098655581.2021.pdf.jpgcb8a883e652537fde7213f1ada13965fMD53unal/81040oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/810402024-08-03 23:10:30.94Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |