Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa
ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas
- Autores:
-
Muñoz Tabares, Luisa Fernanda
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/79988
- Palabra clave:
- 150 - Psicología
Terapia Centrada en la Emoción
Emotion-Focused Therapy
Toma de Decisiones
Decision Making
Toma de decisiones bajo incertidumbre
Emoción
Marcador somático
Iowa Gambling Task
Decision making under uncertainty
Emotion
Somatic marker
Iowa Gambling Task
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_b3d1eac195659ba5047a4a9f7bddcbb7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/79988 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of affectively guided decision-making in a modified-version of the Iowa Gambling Task |
| title |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| spellingShingle |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa 150 - Psicología Terapia Centrada en la Emoción Emotion-Focused Therapy Toma de Decisiones Decision Making Toma de decisiones bajo incertidumbre Emoción Marcador somático Iowa Gambling Task Decision making under uncertainty Emotion Somatic marker Iowa Gambling Task |
| title_short |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| title_full |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| title_fullStr |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| title_sort |
Análisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar Iowa |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Muñoz Tabares, Luisa Fernanda |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Tamayo Osorio, Ricardo Mauricio |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Muñoz Tabares, Luisa Fernanda |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Psicología Experimental y Aplicada |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
150 - Psicología |
| topic |
150 - Psicología Terapia Centrada en la Emoción Emotion-Focused Therapy Toma de Decisiones Decision Making Toma de decisiones bajo incertidumbre Emoción Marcador somático Iowa Gambling Task Decision making under uncertainty Emotion Somatic marker Iowa Gambling Task |
| dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv |
Terapia Centrada en la Emoción Emotion-Focused Therapy Toma de Decisiones Decision Making |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Toma de decisiones bajo incertidumbre Emoción Marcador somático Iowa Gambling Task |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Decision making under uncertainty Emotion Somatic marker Iowa Gambling Task |
| description |
ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-20T20:08:28Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-20T20:08:28Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-19 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79988 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79988 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Agren, T., Millroth, P., Andersson, P., Ridzén, M., & Björkstrand, J. (2019). Detailed analysis of skin conductance responses during a gambling task: Decision, anticipation, and outcomes. Psychophysiology, 56(6), e13338. Areias, G., Paixão, R., & Figueira, A. P. C. (2013). O Iowa Gambling Task: uma revisão crítica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29(2), 201-210. Astor, P. J., Adam, M. T., Jähnig, C., & Seifert, S. (2013). The joy of winning and the frustration of losing: A psychophysiological analysis of emotions in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 6(1), 14. Balodis, I. M., MacDonald, T. K., & Olmstead, M. C. (2006). Instructional cues modify performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 60(2), 109-117. Bechara, A. (2003). Risky business: emotion, decision-making, and addiction. Journal of gambling studies, 19(1), 23-51. Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and economic behavior, 52(2), 336-372. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(4), 159-162. Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 29(1), 86-99. Brevers, D., Bechara, A., Cleeremans, A., & Noël, X. (2013). Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): twenty years after–gambling disorder and IGT. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 665. Buelow, M. T., Okdie, B. M., & Blaine, A. L. (2013). Seeing the forest through the trees: improving decision making on the Iowa gambling task by shifting focus from short-to long-term outcomes. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 773. Carter, S., & Pasqualini, M. C. S. (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasion’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901-911. Cauffman, E., Shulman, E. P., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M. T., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2010). Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 193. Chiu, Y. C., & Lin, C. H. (2007). Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 37. Chiu, Y. C., Huang, J. T., Duann, J. R., & Lin, C. H. (2018). Twenty Years After the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, Emotion, and Decision-Making. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2353. Chiu, Y. C., Lin, C. H., Huang, J. T., Lin, S., Lee, P. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2008). Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1), 13. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A. & Boyer, M. (1998) Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 406–416. Critchley, H. D., Elliott, R., Mathias, C. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(8), 3033-3040. Crone, E. A., Somsen, R. J. M., Van Beek, B., & Van der Molen, M. (2004). Heart rate and skin conductance analysis of antecedents and consequences of decision making. Psychophysiology, 41, 531–540. Crone, E. A., Bunge, S. A., Latenstein, H., van der Molen, M. W. (2005). Characterization of children’s decision making: sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity. Child Neuropsychology, 11, 245-263. Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind, Nueva York. Damasio, A. (2018). Y el cerebro creó al hombre: ¿Cómo pudo el cerebro generar emociones, sentimientos, ideas y el yo? Ediciones Destino. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural brain research, 41(2), 81-94. Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. C. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: theory and preliminary testing. In Levin, H. S., Eisenberg, H. M., & Benton, A. L. (Eds.). Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.217-229. Davis, T., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2009). Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: Covert markers of value or attentional processes? Cognition, 112(1), 195-200. Denburg, N. L., Recknor, E. C., Bechara, A., & Tranel, D. (2006). Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons. International journal of psychophysiology, 61(1), 19-25. Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 239-271. FeldmanHall, O., Glimcher, P., Baker, A. L., & Phelps, E. A. (2016). Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1255. Gobierno Nacional. (2006). Ley 1090 de 2006. Bogotá, D. C Imprenta Nacional. Recuperado: http://www.imprenta.gov.co/gacetap/gaceta.mostrar_documento?p_tipo=05&p_numero=211&p_consec=41421 Gordillo León, F., Arana Martínez, J. M., Salvador Cruz, J., & Mestas Hernández, L. (2011). Emoción y toma de decisiones: teoría y aplicación de la Iowa gambling task. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14(1). Greco, A., Valenza, G., & Scilingo, E. P. (2016). Advances in Electrodermal Activity Processing with Applications for Mental Health. Berlin: Springer. Guenot, M., Isnard, J., & Sindou, M. (2004). Surgical anatomy of the insula. In Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery (pp. 265-288). Springer, Vienna. Guillaume, S., Jollant, F., Jaussent, I., Lawrence, N., Malafosse, A. & Courtet, P. (2009) Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2120–2124. Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257. Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 341-353. Izard, C. E. (1989). The structure and functions of emotions: Implications for cognition, motivation, and personality. Kalat, J., & Shiota, M. (2011). Emotion. Nelson Education. Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Don’t bet on it! Wagering as a measure of awareness in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2111. Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., Smith, N. J., & Bar, M. (2011). Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future. Lin, C. H., Chiu, Y. C., Lee, P., and Hsieh, J. (2007). Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa gambling task? Behav. Brain Funct. 3, 16. Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2012). Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology, 49(2), 154-163. Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(45), 16075-16080. Mardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2012). Personality and Skin ConductanceResponses to Reward and Punishment Influence on the IowaGambling Task Performance.Journal of Individual Differences,33, 17–23 Merigó, J. M. (2015). Decision-making under risk and uncertainty and its application in strategic management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 93-116. Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 77(3), 353-358. Miu, A. C., Crisan, L. G., Chis, A., Ungureanu, L., Druga, B., & Vulturar,R. (2012). Somatic markers mediate the effect of serotonin trans-porter gene polymorphisms on Iowa Gambling Task.Genes, Brainand Behavior, 11, 398–403. Montañés, M. C. (2005). Psicología de la emoción: el proceso emocional. Universidad de Valencia. Muñoz, J. M. (2017). Somatic markers, rhetoric, and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1273. Nagai, Y., Critchley, H. D., Featherstone, E., Trimble, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex covaries with sympathetic skin conductance level: a physiological account of a “default mode” of brain function. Neuroimage, 22(1), 243-251. Nasoz, F., Alvarez, K., Lisetti, C. L., & Finkelstein, N. (2004). Emotion recognition from physiological signals using wireless sensors for presence technologies. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(1), 4-14. Ogorevc, J., Geršak, G., Novak, D., & Drnovšek, J. (2013). Metrological evaluation of skin conductance measurements. Measurement, 46(9), 2993-3001. Ottaviani, C., & Vandone, D. (2015). Decision-Making under uncertainty and demand for health insurance. Journal of Psychophysiology. Pace‐Schott, E. F., Nave, G., Morgan, A., & Spencer, R. M. (2012). Sleep‐dependent modulation of affectively guided decision‐making. Journal of sleep research, 21(1), 30-39. Pereira Restrepo, S. (2019). Emociones, intencionalidad y racionalidad práctica. William James y Antonio Damasio. Ideas y Valores, 68 (170), 13-36. Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(12), 1465-1475. Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., Grillon, C., & Davis, M. (2001). Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nature neuroscience, 4(4), 437. Poppa, T., & Bechara, A. (2018). The somatic marker hypothesis: revisiting the role of the ‘body-loop’in decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 61-66. Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology, 17(3), 715-734. Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A. S., McNamara, J. O., & White, L. E. (2004). Neuroscience, Sinauer Associates. Inc., USA. Reimann, M., & Bechara, A. (2010). The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomics research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 767-776. Saver, J. L., & Damasio, A. R. (1991). Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia, 29(12), 1241-1249. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 39-60. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron, 76(4), 677-694. Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., De Brigard, F., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Episodic future thinking and episodic counterfactual thinking: Intersections between memory and decisions. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 117, 14-21. Senior, C., Russell, T., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Raessens, J. (2006). Methods in mind. MIT press. Shanks, D. R. & St. John, M. F. (1994) Behav. Brain Sci. 17, 367–447. Simonovic, B., Stupple, E. J., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Stress and risky decision making: Cognitive reflection, emotional learning or both. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 658-665. Simonovic, B., Stupple, E., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2019). Sweating the small stuff: A meta-analysis of skin conductance on the Iowa gambling task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(5), 1097-1112. Smith, E. E., Kosslyn, S. M., Platón, R., & Josetr, M. (2008). Procesos cognitivos: modelos y bases neurales (No. 616.8: 159.9). Pearson Educación. Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13), 5035-5040. Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142-162. Tomb, I., Hauser, M., Deldin, P., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?. Nature neuroscience, 5(11), 1103-1104. Turnbull, O. H., Bowman, C., Shanker, S., & Davies, J. (2014). Emotion-based learning: insights from the Iowa Gambling Task. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 162. Van den Bos, R., Houx, B. B., & Spruijt, B. M. (2006). The effect of reward magnitude differences on choosing disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 71(2), 155-161. Werner, N. S., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2009). Relationships between affective states and decision-making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74(3), 259-265. Werner, N. S., Schweitzer, N., Meindl, T., Duschek, S., Kambeitz, J., & Schandry, R. (2013). Interoceptive awareness moderates neural activity during decision-making. Biological psychology, 94(3), 498-506. Williams, L. M., Phillips, M. L., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopoulos, J., Rennie, C., & Gordon, E. (2001). Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1070-1079. Wright, R. J., Rakow, T., & Russo, R. (2017). Go for broke: The role of somatic states when asked to lose in the Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 123, 286-293. Wundt, W. M. (1907). Outlines of psychology. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann. Xu, F., & Huang, L. (2020). Electrophysiological Measurement of Emotion and Somatic State Affecting Ambiguity Decision: Evidences From SCRs, ERPs, and HR. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 899. Yen, N. S., Chou, I. C., Chung, H. K., & Chen, K. H. (2012). The interaction between expected values and risk levels in a modified Iowa gambling task. Biological psychology, 91(2), 232-237. Yip, J. A., Stein, D. H., Côté, S., & Carney, D. R. (2020). Follow your gut? Emotional intelligence moderates the association between physiologically measured somatic markers and risk-taking. Emotion, 20(3), 462. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados al autor, 2021 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados al autor, 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
92 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Psicología |
| dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Psicología |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/2/10136480672021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/3/10136480672021.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6 bcd125f7e45d21b4fd33b8b9421f178c 3477d5ee59e344888ba9889cce4214b4 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1806886246076645376 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados al autor, 2021http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Tamayo Osorio, Ricardo Mauricioeabe96ced40c4534fc2602f125bd4ab1Muñoz Tabares, Luisa Fernanda62a4038671a044b14805c3e2267d04e2Psicología Experimental y Aplicada2021-08-20T20:08:28Z2021-08-20T20:08:28Z2021-08-19https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79988Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, gráficas, tablasTradicionalmente se ha considerado que el ser humano toma decisiones primordialmente racionales, sin embargo, los estudios contemporáneos en psicología indican que las emociones influyen implícitamente sobre nuestras elecciones, especialmente en situaciones de incertidumbre. La Hipótesis del Marcador Somático es una teoría que explica los mecanismos psicológicos mediante los cuales las emociones influyen en nuestras elecciones. Desde esta perspectiva, los estados fisiológicos subyacentes a las emociones marcan nuestras elecciones como ventajosas o desventajosas en función de las recompensas que se esperan obtener. Los marcadores somáticos implicados en la toma de decisiones se han estudiado principalmente mediante la Tarea de Azar de Iowa (IGT). Sin embargo, parecen existir varias inconsistencias en los resultados de diferentes experimentos realizados con la misma tarea. La literatura sugiere que existen fallas metodológicas en la IGT que cuestionan las explicaciones tradicionales acerca los mecanismos mediante los cuales los marcadores somáticos influyen en las decisiones. Recientemente, han surgido teorías alternas sobre la función de los marcadores somáticos y nuevas versiones de la IGT. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar los factores que guían la toma de decisiones en una versión modificada de la IGT, por esto se creó una versión de la IGT basada en la versión propuesta de Cauffman (2010). Once participantes resolvieron la versión modificada que consistía en decidir si apostar o no a la opción ofrecida por el sistema. Durante la ejecución de la tarea se evaluaron tipos de variables dependientes: la respuesta emocional expresada a través de marcadores somáticos medidos como la respuesta de conductancia de la piel; la respuesta conductual expresada a través de la frecuencia de elecciones y el puntaje neto; y el conocimiento explícito de la tarea evaluado a través de un cuestionario. Los resultados mostraron que los marcadores somáticos guían la toma de decisiones. La intensidad de la respuesta emocional se relacionó con la elección realizada por los participantes y no con la opción más ventajosa. Adicionalmente, los marcadores somáticos actuaron en forma de alarma o incentivo según la respuesta emitida por los participantes. Los hallazgos sugieren que no existe un solo factor que active los marcadores somáticos y guíe la toma de decisiones. Por consiguiente, la actividad del marcador somático depende de la silencia contextual de un factor para generar mayor respuesta emocional. (Texto tomado de la fuente)Traditionally it has been considered that human beings make primarily rational decisions; however, contemporary studies in psychology indicate that emotions implicitly influence our choices, especially in situations of uncertainty. The Somatic Marker Hypothesis is a theory that explains the psychological mechanisms by which emotions influence our choices. From this perspective, the physiological states underlying emotions mark our choices as advantageous or disadvantageous depending on the expected rewards to be obtained. Somatic markers involved in decision making have been studied primarily using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). However, there appear to be several inconsistencies in the results of different experiments conducted with the same task. The literature suggests that there are methodological flaws in the IGT that challenge traditional explanations of the mechanisms by which somatic markers influence decisions. Recently, alternative theories about the role of somatic markers and new versions of IGT have emerged. The aim of the present study is to assess the factors that guide decision making in a modified version of the IGT, for this a version of the IGT was created based on the proposed Cauffman´s version (2010). Eleven participants solved the modified version that consisted of deciding whether or not to bet on the option offered by the system. During the execution of the task, types of dependent variables were assessed: emotional response expressed through somatic markers measured as skin conductance response; behavioral response expressed through choice frequency and net score; and explicit knowledge of the task assessed through a questionnaire. Results showed that somatic markers guide decision making. The intensity of the emotional response was related to the choice made by the participants and not to the most advantageous option. Additionally, somatic markers acted in the form of alarm or incentive depending on the response emitted by the participants. The findings suggest that there is no single factor that activates somatic markers and guides decision making. Therefore, somatic marker activity depends on contextual silencing of a factor to generate further emotional response. (Text taken from source)MaestríaMagíster en PsicologíaCognición Implícita92 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en PsicologíaDepartamento de PsicologíaFacultad de Ciencias HumanasBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá150 - PsicologíaTerapia Centrada en la EmociónEmotion-Focused TherapyToma de DecisionesDecision MakingToma de decisiones bajo incertidumbreEmociónMarcador somáticoIowa Gambling TaskDecision making under uncertaintyEmotionSomatic markerIowa Gambling TaskAnálisis de la toma de decisiones guiada afectivamente en una versión modificada de la tarea de azar IowaAnalysis of affectively guided decision-making in a modified-version of the Iowa Gambling TaskTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMAgren, T., Millroth, P., Andersson, P., Ridzén, M., & Björkstrand, J. (2019). Detailed analysis of skin conductance responses during a gambling task: Decision, anticipation, and outcomes. Psychophysiology, 56(6), e13338.Areias, G., Paixão, R., & Figueira, A. P. C. (2013). O Iowa Gambling Task: uma revisão crítica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29(2), 201-210.Astor, P. J., Adam, M. T., Jähnig, C., & Seifert, S. (2013). The joy of winning and the frustration of losing: A psychophysiological analysis of emotions in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 6(1), 14.Balodis, I. M., MacDonald, T. K., & Olmstead, M. C. (2006). Instructional cues modify performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 60(2), 109-117.Bechara, A. (2003). Risky business: emotion, decision-making, and addiction. Journal of gambling studies, 19(1), 23-51.Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and economic behavior, 52(2), 336-372.Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15.Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481.Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295.Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(4), 159-162.Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 29(1), 86-99.Brevers, D., Bechara, A., Cleeremans, A., & Noël, X. (2013). Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): twenty years after–gambling disorder and IGT. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 665.Buelow, M. T., Okdie, B. M., & Blaine, A. L. (2013). Seeing the forest through the trees: improving decision making on the Iowa gambling task by shifting focus from short-to long-term outcomes. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 773.Carter, S., & Pasqualini, M. C. S. (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasion’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901-911.Cauffman, E., Shulman, E. P., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M. T., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2010). Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 193.Chiu, Y. C., & Lin, C. H. (2007). Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), 37.Chiu, Y. C., Huang, J. T., Duann, J. R., & Lin, C. H. (2018). Twenty Years After the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, Emotion, and Decision-Making. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2353.Chiu, Y. C., Lin, C. H., Huang, J. T., Lin, S., Lee, P. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2008). Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1), 13.Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A. & Boyer, M. (1998) Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 406–416.Critchley, H. D., Elliott, R., Mathias, C. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(8), 3033-3040.Crone, E. A., Somsen, R. J. M., Van Beek, B., & Van der Molen, M. (2004). Heart rate and skin conductance analysis of antecedents and consequences of decision making. Psychophysiology, 41, 531–540.Crone, E. A., Bunge, S. A., Latenstein, H., van der Molen, M. W. (2005). Characterization of children’s decision making: sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity. Child Neuropsychology, 11, 245-263.Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind, Nueva York.Damasio, A. (2018). Y el cerebro creó al hombre: ¿Cómo pudo el cerebro generar emociones, sentimientos, ideas y el yo? Ediciones Destino.Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain.Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural brain research, 41(2), 81-94.Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. C. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: theory and preliminary testing. In Levin, H. S., Eisenberg, H. M., & Benton, A. L. (Eds.). Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. Oxford University Press, New York, pp.217-229.Davis, T., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2009). Anticipatory emotions in decision tasks: Covert markers of value or attentional processes? Cognition, 112(1), 195-200.Denburg, N. L., Recknor, E. C., Bechara, A., & Tranel, D. (2006). Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons. International journal of psychophysiology, 61(1), 19-25.Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 239-271.FeldmanHall, O., Glimcher, P., Baker, A. L., & Phelps, E. A. (2016). Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1255.Gobierno Nacional. (2006). Ley 1090 de 2006. Bogotá, D. C Imprenta Nacional. Recuperado: http://www.imprenta.gov.co/gacetap/gaceta.mostrar_documento?p_tipo=05&p_numero=211&p_consec=41421Gordillo León, F., Arana Martínez, J. M., Salvador Cruz, J., & Mestas Hernández, L. (2011). Emoción y toma de decisiones: teoría y aplicación de la Iowa gambling task. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14(1).Greco, A., Valenza, G., & Scilingo, E. P. (2016). Advances in Electrodermal Activity Processing with Applications for Mental Health. Berlin: Springer.Guenot, M., Isnard, J., & Sindou, M. (2004). Surgical anatomy of the insula. In Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery (pp. 265-288). Springer, Vienna.Guillaume, S., Jollant, F., Jaussent, I., Lawrence, N., Malafosse, A. & Courtet, P. (2009) Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2120–2124.Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257.Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 341-353.Izard, C. E. (1989). The structure and functions of emotions: Implications for cognition, motivation, and personality.Kalat, J., & Shiota, M. (2011). Emotion. Nelson Education.Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Don’t bet on it! Wagering as a measure of awareness in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2111.Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., Smith, N. J., & Bar, M. (2011). Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future.Lin, C. H., Chiu, Y. C., Lee, P., and Hsieh, J. (2007). Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa gambling task? Behav. Brain Funct. 3, 16.Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2012). Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology, 49(2), 154-163.Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(45), 16075-16080.Mardaga, S., & Hansenne, M. (2012). Personality and Skin ConductanceResponses to Reward and Punishment Influence on the IowaGambling Task Performance.Journal of Individual Differences,33, 17–23Merigó, J. M. (2015). Decision-making under risk and uncertainty and its application in strategic management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 93-116.Miu, A. C., Heilman, R. M., & Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 77(3), 353-358.Miu, A. C., Crisan, L. G., Chis, A., Ungureanu, L., Druga, B., & Vulturar,R. (2012). Somatic markers mediate the effect of serotonin trans-porter gene polymorphisms on Iowa Gambling Task.Genes, Brainand Behavior, 11, 398–403.Montañés, M. C. (2005). Psicología de la emoción: el proceso emocional. Universidad de Valencia.Muñoz, J. M. (2017). Somatic markers, rhetoric, and post-truth. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1273.Nagai, Y., Critchley, H. D., Featherstone, E., Trimble, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex covaries with sympathetic skin conductance level: a physiological account of a “default mode” of brain function. Neuroimage, 22(1), 243-251.Nasoz, F., Alvarez, K., Lisetti, C. L., & Finkelstein, N. (2004). Emotion recognition from physiological signals using wireless sensors for presence technologies. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(1), 4-14.Ogorevc, J., Geršak, G., Novak, D., & Drnovšek, J. (2013). Metrological evaluation of skin conductance measurements. Measurement, 46(9), 2993-3001.Ottaviani, C., & Vandone, D. (2015). Decision-Making under uncertainty and demand for health insurance. Journal of Psychophysiology.Pace‐Schott, E. F., Nave, G., Morgan, A., & Spencer, R. M. (2012). Sleep‐dependent modulation of affectively guided decision‐making. Journal of sleep research, 21(1), 30-39.Pereira Restrepo, S. (2019). Emociones, intencionalidad y racionalidad práctica. William James y Antonio Damasio. Ideas y Valores, 68 (170), 13-36.Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(12), 1465-1475.Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., Grillon, C., & Davis, M. (2001). Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear. Nature neuroscience, 4(4), 437.Poppa, T., & Bechara, A. (2018). The somatic marker hypothesis: revisiting the role of the ‘body-loop’in decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 61-66.Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology, 17(3), 715-734.Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A. S., McNamara, J. O., & White, L. E. (2004). Neuroscience, Sinauer Associates. Inc., USA.Reimann, M., & Bechara, A. (2010). The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomics research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 767-776.Saver, J. L., & Damasio, A. R. (1991). Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia, 29(12), 1241-1249.Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 39-60.Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron, 76(4), 677-694.Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., De Brigard, F., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Episodic future thinking and episodic counterfactual thinking: Intersections between memory and decisions. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 117, 14-21.Senior, C., Russell, T., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Raessens, J. (2006). Methods in mind. MIT press.Shanks, D. R. & St. John, M. F. (1994) Behav. Brain Sci. 17, 367–447.Simonovic, B., Stupple, E. J., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Stress and risky decision making: Cognitive reflection, emotional learning or both. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 658-665.Simonovic, B., Stupple, E., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2019). Sweating the small stuff: A meta-analysis of skin conductance on the Iowa gambling task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(5), 1097-1112.Smith, E. E., Kosslyn, S. M., Platón, R., & Josetr, M. (2008). Procesos cognitivos: modelos y bases neurales (No. 616.8: 159.9). Pearson Educación.Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13), 5035-5040.Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142-162.Tomb, I., Hauser, M., Deldin, P., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?. Nature neuroscience, 5(11), 1103-1104.Turnbull, O. H., Bowman, C., Shanker, S., & Davies, J. (2014). Emotion-based learning: insights from the Iowa Gambling Task. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 162.Van den Bos, R., Houx, B. B., & Spruijt, B. M. (2006). The effect of reward magnitude differences on choosing disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 71(2), 155-161.Werner, N. S., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2009). Relationships between affective states and decision-making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74(3), 259-265.Werner, N. S., Schweitzer, N., Meindl, T., Duschek, S., Kambeitz, J., & Schandry, R. (2013). Interoceptive awareness moderates neural activity during decision-making. Biological psychology, 94(3), 498-506.Williams, L. M., Phillips, M. L., Brammer, M. J., Skerrett, D., Lagopoulos, J., Rennie, C., & Gordon, E. (2001). Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1070-1079.Wright, R. J., Rakow, T., & Russo, R. (2017). Go for broke: The role of somatic states when asked to lose in the Iowa Gambling Task. Biological psychology, 123, 286-293.Wundt, W. M. (1907). Outlines of psychology. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann.Xu, F., & Huang, L. (2020). Electrophysiological Measurement of Emotion and Somatic State Affecting Ambiguity Decision: Evidences From SCRs, ERPs, and HR. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 899.Yen, N. S., Chou, I. C., Chung, H. K., & Chen, K. H. (2012). The interaction between expected values and risk levels in a modified Iowa gambling task. Biological psychology, 91(2), 232-237.Yip, J. A., Stein, D. H., Côté, S., & Carney, D. R. (2020). Follow your gut? Emotional intelligence moderates the association between physiologically measured somatic markers and risk-taking. Emotion, 20(3), 462.EspecializadaLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83964https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/1/license.txtcccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6MD51ORIGINAL10136480672021.pdf10136480672021.pdfTesis de Maestría en Psicologíaapplication/pdf787247https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/2/10136480672021.pdfbcd125f7e45d21b4fd33b8b9421f178cMD52THUMBNAIL10136480672021.pdf.jpg10136480672021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5171https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/79988/3/10136480672021.pdf.jpg3477d5ee59e344888ba9889cce4214b4MD53unal/79988oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/799882023-07-26 23:03:44.989Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |