Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura

ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas

Autores:: Herrera Fajardo, Laura Ximena

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Repositorio:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	UNACIONAL2_b31752e3c4a7faef500743b7492f4c69
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/80497
network_acronym_str	UNACIONAL2
network_name_str	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Treatment with dental implants of different dimensions in edentulous jaws in adults. A systematic review of the literature
title	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
spellingShingle	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura 610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiología Prótesis Dental Revisión Odontología/métodos Dental Prosthesis Review Dentistry/methods Implantes dentales Falla Pérdida ósea alveolar Revisión sistemática Dental implants Failure Alveolar bone loss Systematic review
title_short	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
title_full	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
title_fullStr	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
title_full_unstemmed	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
title_sort	Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Herrera Fajardo, Laura Ximena
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Gaitán Duarte, Hernando Guillermo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Herrera Fajardo, Laura Ximena
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv	610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiología
topic	610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiología Prótesis Dental Revisión Odontología/métodos Dental Prosthesis Review Dentistry/methods Implantes dentales Falla Pérdida ósea alveolar Revisión sistemática Dental implants Failure Alveolar bone loss Systematic review
dc.subject.decs.spa.fl_str_mv	Prótesis Dental Revisión Odontología/métodos
dc.subject.decs.eng.fl_str_mv	Dental Prosthesis Review Dentistry/methods
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Implantes dentales Falla Pérdida ósea alveolar Revisión sistemática
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	Dental implants Failure Alveolar bone loss Systematic review
description	ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-10-11T21:20:34Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-10-11T21:20:34Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80497
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80497 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.indexed.spa.fl_str_mv	Bireme
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Aunmeungtong W, Kumchai T, Strietzel F, Reichart PA, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Implants for Mandibular Overdentures> A randomized Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research19(2):328-340. de Souza RF, Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP, Costa L, Cunha TR, Reis AC, Albuquerque Jr RF. Mini vs Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Dental Research 2015;94(10):1376-1384. de Souza AB, Sukekava F, Tolentino L, Cesar-Neto JB, Garcez-Filho J, Araujo MG. Narrow- and regular-diameter implans in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3 year split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 2018;29:100-107. Felice P, Checchi L, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Sammartino G, Masi I, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9(1):35-45. Ghazal SS, Huynh-Ba G, Aghaloo T, Dibart S, Froum S, O'Neal R, Cochran D. Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating Crestal Bone Level Change of Narrow Diameter Versus Standard-Diameter Ti-Zr Implants for Single Tooth Replacement in Anterior and Premolar Region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34(3):708-718. Ioannidis A, Gallucci GO, Jung RE, Borzangy S, Hammerle CHF, Benic GI. Titanium zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2015;42:1060-1070. Romeo E, Storelli S, Casano G, Scanferla M, Botticelli D. Six- mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(4):371-381. Rossi F, Botticelli D, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6mm) in a single tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2015;27:458-464. Threeburuth W, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P. Comparision of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:785-792. Weerapong K, Sirimongkolwattana S, Sastraruji T, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative Study of Immediate Loading on Short Dental Implants and Conventional Dental Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2019;34:141-149. Zadeh HH, Gujle F, Palmer PJ, Abrahamsson I, Chen S, Mahallati R, Stanford CM. Marginal bone level and survival of short and standard-length implants after 3 years: An Open Multi Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Oral Implant Research 2018;29:894-906. Al Amri MD, Abduljabbar TS, Al-Johany SS, Al Rifaiy MQ, Alfarraj Aldosari AM, Al-Kheraif AA. Comparison of clinical and radiographic parameters around short (6 to 8 mm in length) and long (11 mm in length) dental implants placed in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up results. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2017;28(10):1182-1187. Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence International 2014;45(6):499-514. Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb-Ali TB, Yunus N. Outcomes of placing short implants in the posterior mandible: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Australian Dental Journal 2016;61(2):208-18. Al-Nawas B, Bragger U, Meijer HJ, Naert I, Persson R, Perucchi A, Quirynen M, Raghoebar GM, Reichert TE, Romeo E, Santing HJ, Schimmel M, Storelli S, ten Bruggenkate C, Vandekerckhove B, Wagner W, Wismeijer D, Muller F. A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV small-diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles--results from a 1-year observation period. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2012;14(6):896-904. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2011;22(3):330-7. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiology 1998;27(4):221-4. Benlidayi ME, Ucar Y, Tatli U, Ekren O, Evlice B, Kisa HI, Baksi U. Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: Midterm Outcomes of a Clinical Study. Implant Dentistry 2018;27(1):95-100. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior región. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007;18(6):707-14. Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG. Effects of implant diameter and prosthesis retention system on the reliability of single crowns. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2015;30(1):95-101. Freitas GP, Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2016;29(2):179-85. Freitas-Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG. Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2011;24(6):557-61. Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Machado LS, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Mechanical evaluation of four narrow-diameter implant systems. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2014;27(4):359-62. Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Freitas G, Fardin VP, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems. Clinical Oral Investigations 2016;20(7):1505-13. Jawad S, Barclay C, Whittaker W, Tickle M, Walsh T. A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible. BMC Oral Health 2017;17(1):53. Mendoza-Azpur G, Lau M, Valdivia E, Rojas J, Munoz H, Nevins M. Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2016;36(6):791-795. Naenni N, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Attin T, Wiedemeier DB, Sapata V, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Five-Year Survival of Short Single-Tooth Implants (6 mm): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Dental Research 2018;97(8):887-892. Papadimitriou DE, Friedland B, Gannam C, Salari S, Gallucci GO. Narrow-Diameter versus Standard-Diameter Implants and Their Effect on the Need for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Virtual Three-Dimensional Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2015;17(6):1127-33. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(1):69-76. Sahrmann P, Schoen P, Naenni N, Jung R, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Peri-implant bone density around implants of different lengths: A 3-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2017;44(7):762-768. Temizel S, Heinemann F, Dirk C, Bourauel C, Hasan I. Clinical and radiological investigations of mandibular overdentures supported by conventional or mini-dental implants: A 2-year prospective follow-up study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2017;117(2):239-246. Trbakovic A, Bongenhielm U, Thor A. A clinical and radiological long-term follow-up study of narrow diameter implants in the aesthetic area. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2018;20(4):598-605. Zygogiannis K, Aartman IH, Parsa A, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2017;32(6):1377-1388. Guida L, Annunziata M, Esposito U, Sirignano M, Torrisi P, Cecchinato D. 6-mm-short and 11-mm-long implants compared in the full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 3-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2020;31(1):64-73. Guljé FL, Meijer HJA, Abrahamsson I, Barwacz CA, Chen S, Palmer PJ, Zadeh H, Stanford CM. Comparison of 6-mm and 11-mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2021;32(1):15-22. Castellanos-Cosano L, Rodriguez-Perez A, Spinato S, Wainwright M, Machuca-Portillo G, Serrera-Figallo MA, Torres-Lagares D. Descriptive Retrospective Study Analyzing Relevant Factors Related to Dental Implant Failure. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2019;24(6):e726-e738. Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Oliveira HFFE, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta analysis. Brazilian Oral Research 2018;32:e86. Elani HW, Harper S, Thomson WM, Espinoza IL, Mejia CG, Ju X, Jamieson LM, I. Kawachi I, Kaufman JS. Social inequalities in tooth loss: A multinational comparison. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2017;45(3):266-274. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vaillancourt JM. Meta analyses involving cross-overtrials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:140-149. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. International Journal of Dentistry 2013;2013. Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017;43(2):70-76. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants.(I)Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106(1):527-51. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants-a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2(3):167-84. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014;13(5). Fan T, Li Y, Deng WW, Wu T, Zhang W. Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2017;19(1):207-215. Felton DA. Edentulism and comorbid factors. Journal of Prosthodontics 2009;18(2):88-96. Grant BTN, Pancko FX, Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2009;67(4):713-7. Higgins JPT, Wells G A. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [update March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane 2019. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcene W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research 2014;93(7 Suppl):20S-28S. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabe E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, Murray CJL, Marcenes W, GBD 2105 Oral Health Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Journal of Dental Research 2017;96(4):380-387. Kennedy KS, Jones EM, Kim DG, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2013;28(1):170-7. Klein MO, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2014;29:Suppl:43-54. Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Dentistry 2016;47:8-17. Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RS. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior región. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2014;41(2):191 Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garcia-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone los around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2014;25(10):1119-24. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology 2000 2014;66(1):72-96. Omran MTA, Miley DD, McLeod DE, Garcia MN. Retrospective assessment of survival rate for short endosseous dental implants. Implant dentistry 2015;24(2):185-191. Palacios JAV, Garcia JJ, Carames JMM, Quirynen M, da Silva Marques DN. Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations 2018;22(1):69-80. Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Buseniechner D, Millesi W, Furhauser R. Extra-short (< 7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (< 3.5 mm) implants: a meta-analytic literature review. European Journal of Oral Implantology 2018;11:Suppl 1:S137-S146. Rao JNK, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992;48:577-585. Ribeiro CG, Cascaes AM, Silva AE, Seerig LM, Nascimento GG, Demarco FF. Edentulism, severe tooth loss and lack of functional dentition in elders: A study in Southern Brazil. Brazilian dental journal 2016;27(3):345-352. Russell S L, Gordon S, Lukacs JR, Kaste LM. Sex/gender differences in tooth loss and edentulism. Dent Clin North Am 2013;57(2):317-337. Sendyk DI, Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A, Zindel Deboni MC. Does Surgical Experience Influence Implant Survival Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2017;30:341-347. Sierra-Sanchez JL, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Sala Bonmati F, Manes-Ferrer JF, Brotons Oliver A. Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literatura review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2014;19(1):e74-e81. Slade GD, Akinkugbe AA, Sanders AE. Projections of US Edentulism prevalence following 5 decades of decline. Journal of dental research 2014;93(10):959-965. Smith DC. Dental implants: materials and design considerations. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1993;6(2106-17). Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012;23(5):515-25. Starr JM, Hall R. Predictors and correlates of edentulism in healthy older people. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 2010;13(1):19-23. Tagliareni JM, Clarkson E. Basic concepts and techniques of dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59(2):255-264. Tramacere I, DelGiovaneC, SalantiG, D’AmicoR, FilippiniG. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsingremittingmultiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;18(9):doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub2. van der Putten GJ, De Visschere L, Schols J, de Baat C, Vanobbergen J. Supervised versus non-supervised implementation of an oral health care guideline in (residential) care homes: a cluster randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2010;2:10-17. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill, R. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2016;69:225-234.
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	xii, 146 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá - Medicina - Maestría en Epidemiología Clínica
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
institution	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/2/53125328.2021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/3/53125328.2021.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	cccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6 123c90b4c1dc10425a2876bbc51d7e66 05a9d2d0fb0fbee61ac43a5c0e801f25
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_	1814090123349852160
spelling	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Gaitán Duarte, Hernando Guillermo05c5bee7451457156f7dcfa9ccd634f4Herrera Fajardo, Laura Ximenaceab74fab5213ff7de69328cfa126e062021-10-11T21:20:34Z2021-10-11T21:20:34Z2021https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80497Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, gráficas, tablasAntecedentes El edentulismo o pérdida dental es una condición irreversible que genera una disminución en la cantidad y calidad del reborde alveolar. Los implantes dentales han llegado a ser una opción de tratamiento para reemplazar los dientes perdidos reestableciendo la función y estética. Cuando no existe un adecuado volumen óseo, los implantes cortos o de diámetro estrecho han sido introducidos como una alternativa. Objetivos Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad del uso de implantes dentales con dimensiones reducidas comparados con los implantes dentales con dimensiones convencionales restaurados en adultos con maxilares total o parcialmente edéntulos. Métodos de búsqueda Se realizó una búsqueda electrónica y una búsqueda manual. Los resultados de las búsquedas se gestionaron mediante el software EndNote. Criterios de selección Ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados realizados en adultos con pérdida dental total o parcial, aptos para recibir implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en el maxilar superior o inferior. Extracción de datos y análisis Dos autores de forma independiente revisaron los títulos, resúmenes y el texto completo de los estudios para identificar los potencialmente elegibles. Dos autores de forma independiente extrajeron los datos de los estudios incluidos. Los resultados se combinaron usando el modelo de efectos fijos con un riesgo relativo (RR) junto con un intervalo de confianza de 95% (IC 95%) para los desenlaces dicotómicos y el modelo de efectos aleatorios con una diferencia de medias junto con un intervalo de confianza de 95% (IC 95%) para los desenlaces continuos. Principales resultados Se identificaron 11 estudios con un total de 1279 implantes colocados en 682 pacientes. Los resultados indicaron que los implantes dentales de dimensiones reducidas podrían aumentar la falla de los implantes, sin embargo, la evidencia es incierta (RR 2.20, IC 95% 0.97 a 4.97; participantes = 495, estudios = 6, I2 = 0%, calificación de la certeza de la evidencia: baja), complicaciones (RR 1.27, IC 95% 0.45 a 3.53; participantes = 291, estudios = 4, I2 = 0%, calificación de la certeza de la evidencia: muy baja) y cambios óseos radiográficos (diferencia de medias -0.09 mm, IC 95% -0.25 a 0.07; participantes = 574, estudios = 10, I2 = 75%, calificación de la certeza de la evidencia: muy baja). Ningún estudio informo el tiempo de sobrevida de los implantes. Conclusión de los autores Los resultados de esta revisión demuestran que los implantes dentales con dimensiones reducidas podrían aumentar la falla de los implantes (certeza de la evidencia baja) y que podría no haber diferencias entre el uso de implantes dentales de dimensiones reducidas versus los implantes de dimensiones convencionales en términos de complicaciones y cambios óseos radiográficos, no se puede dar ningún tipo de consideración para modificar la practica actual. Es necesario realizar más ensayos clínicos con un adecuado diseño. (Texto tomado de la fuente).Background Dental loss is an irreversible condition that generates a decrease in the quantity and quality of the alveolar ridge. Dental implants have become a treatment option to replace missing teeth by re-establishing function and aesthetics. When there is not adequate bone volume, short or narrow diameter implants have been introduced as an alternative. Objectives Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of dental implants with reduced dimensions compared to dental implants with conventional dimensions restored in adults with fully or partially edentulous jaws. Search methods An electronic and manual search were carried out. Search results were managed using EndNote software. Selection criteria Randomized controlled clinical trials performed in adults with total or partial tooth loss, suitable for receiving dental implants of different dimensions in the upper or lower jaw. Data extraction and analysis Two authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full text of the studies to identify potentially eligible ones. Two authors independently extracted data from included studies. Results were combined using the fixed effect model with a relative risk (RR) together with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes and the random effects model with a mean difference together with an interval 95% confidence (95% CI) for continuous outcomes. Main results Eleven studies were identified with a total of 1279 implants placed in 682 patients. The results indicated that small dental implants could increase implant failure, however, the evidence is uncertain (RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.97 to 4.97; participants = 495, studies = 6, I2 = 0%, quality of evidence: low), complications (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.53; participants = 291, studies = 4, I2 = 0%, quality of evidence: very low), and radiographic bone changes (mean difference -0.09 mm, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.07; participants = 574, studies = 10, I2 = 75%, quality of evidence: very low). No study reported the survival time of implants. Authors' conclusion The results of this review demonstrate that reduced-size dental implants could increase implant failure (low-certainty of evidence) and that there might be no difference between the use of reduced-size dental implants versus conventional-size implants in terms of complications and radiographic bone changes, no consideration can be given to modify current practice. More clinical trials with an adequate design are necessary.MaestríaMagíster en Ciencias Epidemiología Clínicaxii, 146 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Medicina - Maestría en Epidemiología ClínicaFacultad de MedicinaBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiologíaPrótesis DentalRevisiónOdontología/métodosDental ProsthesisReviewDentistry/methodsImplantes dentalesFallaPérdida ósea alveolarRevisión sistemáticaDental implantsFailureAlveolar bone lossSystematic reviewTratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literaturaTreatment with dental implants of different dimensions in edentulous jaws in adults. A systematic review of the literatureTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMBiremeAunmeungtong W, Kumchai T, Strietzel F, Reichart PA, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Implants for Mandibular Overdentures> A randomized Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research19(2):328-340.de Souza RF, Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP, Costa L, Cunha TR, Reis AC, Albuquerque Jr RF. Mini vs Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Dental Research 2015;94(10):1376-1384.de Souza AB, Sukekava F, Tolentino L, Cesar-Neto JB, Garcez-Filho J, Araujo MG. Narrow- and regular-diameter implans in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3 year split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 2018;29:100-107.Felice P, Checchi L, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Sammartino G, Masi I, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9(1):35-45.Ghazal SS, Huynh-Ba G, Aghaloo T, Dibart S, Froum S, O'Neal R, Cochran D. Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating Crestal Bone Level Change of Narrow Diameter Versus Standard-Diameter Ti-Zr Implants for Single Tooth Replacement in Anterior and Premolar Region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34(3):708-718.Ioannidis A, Gallucci GO, Jung RE, Borzangy S, Hammerle CHF, Benic GI. Titanium zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2015;42:1060-1070.Romeo E, Storelli S, Casano G, Scanferla M, Botticelli D. Six- mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(4):371-381.Rossi F, Botticelli D, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6mm) in a single tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2015;27:458-464.Threeburuth W, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P. Comparision of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:785-792.Weerapong K, Sirimongkolwattana S, Sastraruji T, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative Study of Immediate Loading on Short Dental Implants and Conventional Dental Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2019;34:141-149.Zadeh HH, Gujle F, Palmer PJ, Abrahamsson I, Chen S, Mahallati R, Stanford CM. Marginal bone level and survival of short and standard-length implants after 3 years: An Open Multi Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Oral Implant Research 2018;29:894-906.Al Amri MD, Abduljabbar TS, Al-Johany SS, Al Rifaiy MQ, Alfarraj Aldosari AM, Al-Kheraif AA. Comparison of clinical and radiographic parameters around short (6 to 8 mm in length) and long (11 mm in length) dental implants placed in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up results. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2017;28(10):1182-1187.Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence International 2014;45(6):499-514.Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb-Ali TB, Yunus N. Outcomes of placing short implants in the posterior mandible: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Australian Dental Journal 2016;61(2):208-18.Al-Nawas B, Bragger U, Meijer HJ, Naert I, Persson R, Perucchi A, Quirynen M, Raghoebar GM, Reichert TE, Romeo E, Santing HJ, Schimmel M, Storelli S, ten Bruggenkate C, Vandekerckhove B, Wagner W, Wismeijer D, Muller F. A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV small-diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles--results from a 1-year observation period. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2012;14(6):896-904.Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2011;22(3):330-7.Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiology 1998;27(4):221-4.Benlidayi ME, Ucar Y, Tatli U, Ekren O, Evlice B, Kisa HI, Baksi U. Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: Midterm Outcomes of a Clinical Study. Implant Dentistry 2018;27(1):95-100.Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior región. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007;18(6):707-14.Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG. Effects of implant diameter and prosthesis retention system on the reliability of single crowns. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2015;30(1):95-101.Freitas GP, Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2016;29(2):179-85.Freitas-Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG. Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2011;24(6):557-61.Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Machado LS, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Mechanical evaluation of four narrow-diameter implant systems. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2014;27(4):359-62.Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Freitas G, Fardin VP, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems. Clinical Oral Investigations 2016;20(7):1505-13.Jawad S, Barclay C, Whittaker W, Tickle M, Walsh T. A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible. BMC Oral Health 2017;17(1):53.Mendoza-Azpur G, Lau M, Valdivia E, Rojas J, Munoz H, Nevins M. Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2016;36(6):791-795.Naenni N, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Attin T, Wiedemeier DB, Sapata V, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Five-Year Survival of Short Single-Tooth Implants (6 mm): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Dental Research 2018;97(8):887-892.Papadimitriou DE, Friedland B, Gannam C, Salari S, Gallucci GO. Narrow-Diameter versus Standard-Diameter Implants and Their Effect on the Need for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Virtual Three-Dimensional Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2015;17(6):1127-33.Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(1):69-76.Sahrmann P, Schoen P, Naenni N, Jung R, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Peri-implant bone density around implants of different lengths: A 3-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2017;44(7):762-768.Temizel S, Heinemann F, Dirk C, Bourauel C, Hasan I. Clinical and radiological investigations of mandibular overdentures supported by conventional or mini-dental implants: A 2-year prospective follow-up study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2017;117(2):239-246.Trbakovic A, Bongenhielm U, Thor A. A clinical and radiological long-term follow-up study of narrow diameter implants in the aesthetic area. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2018;20(4):598-605.Zygogiannis K, Aartman IH, Parsa A, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2017;32(6):1377-1388.Guida L, Annunziata M, Esposito U, Sirignano M, Torrisi P, Cecchinato D. 6-mm-short and 11-mm-long implants compared in the full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 3-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2020;31(1):64-73.Guljé FL, Meijer HJA, Abrahamsson I, Barwacz CA, Chen S, Palmer PJ, Zadeh H, Stanford CM. Comparison of 6-mm and 11-mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2021;32(1):15-22.Castellanos-Cosano L, Rodriguez-Perez A, Spinato S, Wainwright M, Machuca-Portillo G, Serrera-Figallo MA, Torres-Lagares D. Descriptive Retrospective Study Analyzing Relevant Factors Related to Dental Implant Failure. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2019;24(6):e726-e738.Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Oliveira HFFE, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta analysis. Brazilian Oral Research 2018;32:e86.Elani HW, Harper S, Thomson WM, Espinoza IL, Mejia CG, Ju X, Jamieson LM, I. Kawachi I, Kaufman JS. Social inequalities in tooth loss: A multinational comparison. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2017;45(3):266-274.Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vaillancourt JM. Meta analyses involving cross-overtrials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:140-149.Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. International Journal of Dentistry 2013;2013.Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017;43(2):70-76.Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants.(I)Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106(1):527-51.Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants-a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2(3):167-84.Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014;13(5).Fan T, Li Y, Deng WW, Wu T, Zhang W. Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2017;19(1):207-215.Felton DA. Edentulism and comorbid factors. Journal of Prosthodontics 2009;18(2):88-96.Grant BTN, Pancko FX, Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2009;67(4):713-7.Higgins JPT, Wells G A. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [update March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011.Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane 2019.Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcene W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research 2014;93(7 Suppl):20S-28S.Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabe E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, Murray CJL, Marcenes W, GBD 2105 Oral Health Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Journal of Dental Research 2017;96(4):380-387.Kennedy KS, Jones EM, Kim DG, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2013;28(1):170-7.Klein MO, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2014;29:Suppl:43-54.Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Dentistry 2016;47:8-17.Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RS. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior región. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2014;41(2):191Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garcia-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone los around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2014;25(10):1119-24.Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology 2000 2014;66(1):72-96.Omran MTA, Miley DD, McLeod DE, Garcia MN. Retrospective assessment of survival rate for short endosseous dental implants. Implant dentistry 2015;24(2):185-191.Palacios JAV, Garcia JJ, Carames JMM, Quirynen M, da Silva Marques DN. Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations 2018;22(1):69-80.Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Buseniechner D, Millesi W, Furhauser R. Extra-short (< 7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (< 3.5 mm) implants: a meta-analytic literature review. European Journal of Oral Implantology 2018;11:Suppl 1:S137-S146.Rao JNK, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992;48:577-585.Ribeiro CG, Cascaes AM, Silva AE, Seerig LM, Nascimento GG, Demarco FF. Edentulism, severe tooth loss and lack of functional dentition in elders: A study in Southern Brazil. Brazilian dental journal 2016;27(3):345-352.Russell S L, Gordon S, Lukacs JR, Kaste LM. Sex/gender differences in tooth loss and edentulism. Dent Clin North Am 2013;57(2):317-337.Sendyk DI, Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A, Zindel Deboni MC. Does Surgical Experience Influence Implant Survival Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2017;30:341-347.Sierra-Sanchez JL, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Sala Bonmati F, Manes-Ferrer JF, Brotons Oliver A. Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literatura review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2014;19(1):e74-e81.Slade GD, Akinkugbe AA, Sanders AE. Projections of US Edentulism prevalence following 5 decades of decline. Journal of dental research 2014;93(10):959-965.Smith DC. Dental implants: materials and design considerations. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1993;6(2106-17).Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012;23(5):515-25.Starr JM, Hall R. Predictors and correlates of edentulism in healthy older people. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 2010;13(1):19-23.Tagliareni JM, Clarkson E. Basic concepts and techniques of dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59(2):255-264.Tramacere I, DelGiovaneC, SalantiG, D’AmicoR, FilippiniG. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsingremittingmultiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;18(9):doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub2.van der Putten GJ, De Visschere L, Schols J, de Baat C, Vanobbergen J. Supervised versus non-supervised implementation of an oral health care guideline in (residential) care homes: a cluster randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2010;2:10-17.Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill, R. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2016;69:225-234.Público generalLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83964https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/1/license.txtcccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6MD51ORIGINAL53125328.2021.pdf53125328.2021.pdfTesis de Maestría en Epidemiología Clínicaapplication/pdf1337205https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/2/53125328.2021.pdf123c90b4c1dc10425a2876bbc51d7e66MD52THUMBNAIL53125328.2021.pdf.jpg53125328.2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5326https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80497/3/53125328.2021.pdf.jpg05a9d2d0fb0fbee61ac43a5c0e801f25MD53unal/80497oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/804972024-07-31 23:13:20.747Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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

Tratamiento con implantes dentales de diferentes dimensiones en maxilares edéntulos en adultos. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura

Publicaciones similares