Filosofía trascendental mundaneizada
This paper offers support to Heidegger's first book on Kant ínsofar as the subject of knowledge is seen as an empirical being m the midst of t beings and exposed to them. But in accordance with this view, it emphasízes experience as causal insertion in the world rather than (imaginative) intuit...
- Autores:
-
Heymann, Ezra
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 1996
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/34538
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/34538
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/24618/
- Palabra clave:
- Pregunta por la cosa
tesis kantiana sobre el ser
sujeto
legislación epistémica
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
| Summary: | This paper offers support to Heidegger's first book on Kant ínsofar as the subject of knowledge is seen as an empirical being m the midst of t beings and exposed to them. But in accordance with this view, it emphasízes experience as causal insertion in the world rather than (imaginative) intuition. Consequently, it emphasízes the realistic trend of the second édition of the CpR, a trend which is anticipated in the Analogies of Experience. In its last section, the paper supports Alberto Rosales' view that piecemeal synthesis is the existential basis of the trancendental unity of consciousness, whereas the later is the ideal basis ofthe former. |
|---|