Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions

ilustraciones, fotografías, graficas, tablas

Autores:: González Montaña, Luis Antonio

Tipo de recurso:: Doctoral thesis

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Repositorio:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Idioma:: eng

id	UNACIONAL2_92d718b60d198581eef7a5611003bee4
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/81441
network_acronym_str	UNACIONAL2
network_name_str	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Revisión taxonómica del género Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) para la región neotropical e inclusión de ontologías en descripciones morfológicas
title	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
spellingShingle	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions 590 - Animales::592 - Invertebrados Collembola Región neotropical ontología anatómica tripletes RDF métodos semánticos Hexapoda Anatomy ontology RDF triplet Semantic-based methods
title_short	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
title_full	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
title_fullStr	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
title_full_unstemmed	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
title_sort	Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	González Montaña, Luis Antonio
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Rueda Ramirez, Diana Marcela Gaigl, Andreas
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	González Montaña, Luis Antonio
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv	590 - Animales::592 - Invertebrados
topic	590 - Animales::592 - Invertebrados Collembola Región neotropical ontología anatómica tripletes RDF métodos semánticos Hexapoda Anatomy ontology RDF triplet Semantic-based methods
dc.subject.agrovocuri.none.fl_str_mv	Collembola
dc.subject.agrovocuri.spa.fl_str_mv	Región neotropical
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	ontología anatómica tripletes RDF métodos semánticos Hexapoda
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	Anatomy ontology RDF triplet Semantic-based methods
description	ilustraciones, fotografías, graficas, tablas
publishDate	2021
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-04-04
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-04-05T22:01:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-04-05T22:01:44Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.other.none.fl_str_mv	https://github.com/luis-gonzalez-m
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81441
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url	https://github.com/luis-gonzalez-m https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81441 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Bardgett, R. D. 2002. Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil. Zoology, 105(4), 367-375. Baquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2014. Singular fauna of Entomobryidae (Collembola) from" Land of Passes" in the Himalayas, India. Florida Entomologist, 1554-1587. Baquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2015. Entomobryoidea (Collembola) from Himachal Pradesh (India) in the Himalayas. Zootaxa, 4027(1), 1-41. Bellinger, P.F., Christiansen, K.A. & Janssens, F. 2021 Checklist of the Collembola of the World. 1996– 2021. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (accessed 10 June 2021). Bellini, B. C., Cipola, N. G., & Godeiro, N. N. 2015. New species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet and Entomobrya Rondani (Collembola: Entomobryoidea: Entomobryidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 4027(2), 227-242. Beruete, E., Baquero, E. & Jordana, R. 2002. New species of Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae) from karst caves of the Basque bio-speleologic district., Ann. Soc. entomol. Fr. (n.s.), 2002, 38 (4), p.385-398. Börner, C. 1913. Die Familien der Collembolen. Zool. Anz. 41: 315-322. Bourlet, C. 1839. Mémoire sur les Podures., Mémoires de la Société Royale des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts, de Lille, Année 1839, p.377-418. Brennan, A., Fortune, T., and Bolger, T. 2006. Collembola abundances and assemblage structures in conventionally tilled and conservation tillage arable systems. Pedobiologia, 50(2): 135-145. Carapelli, A., Frati, F., Fanciulli, P. & Dallai, R. 2001. Taxonomic revision of 14 south-western European species of Isotomurus (Collembola, Isotomidae), with description of four new species and the designation of the neotype for I. palustris. Zoologica Scripta, 30, 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2001.00055.x. Carpenter, G. 1916. Iles Seychelles. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 28-58. Christiansen K. 1954. Ratios as a means of specific differentiation in Collembola. Entomological News 65: 177–178. Christiansen, K. 1958. The Entomobryiforrn Male Genital Plate. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 65, 1:474-476. Christiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1991. Phylogeny of the Hawaiian species of the genus Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Revue d'Écologie et de Biologie du Sol, 28 (2), 207–215. Christiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1998. The Collembola of North America North of the Rio Grande, A taxonomic analysis., Grinnell College, Iowa, p.1-1520. Cipola, N. G., Morais, J. W. & Bellini, B. C. 2017. The discovery of Lepidocyrtoides Schött, 1917 (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Entomobryinae) from the New World, including three new species from Brazil and one from Australia. Zootaxa, 4324(2), 201-248. Cipola, N. G., de Morais, J. W., & Bellini, B. C. 2019. New subgenus and four species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Lepidocyrtinae) from Amazon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 50(2), 189-234. Cipola, N., Oliveira, J., Bellini, B., Ferreira, A., Lima, E., Brito, R. & Stievano, L. 2020. Review of eyeless Pseudosinella Schäffer (Collembola, Entomobryidae, and Lepidocyrtinae) from Brazilian caves. Insects, 11-194. doi:10.3390/insects11030194. Cucini, C., Fanciulli, P. P., Frati, F., Convey, P., Nardi, F., & Carapelli, A. 2021. Re-evaluating the internal phylogenetic relationships of Collembola by means of mitogenome data. Genes, 12(1), 44. Culik, M., de Souza, J., & Ventura, J. 2002. Biodiversity of Collembola in tropical agricultural environments of Espı́ritu Santo, Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 21(1): 49-58. Daston, L., 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc. Stud. Sci. 22, 597–618. Deharveng, L. 2004. Recent advances in Collembola systematics. Pedobiologia, 48(5-6), 415-433. De Freitas, T. 2016. Novas espécies de Entomobryoidea, Womersley, 1934 (Collembola, Hexapoda) em duas áreas de caatinga do Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Fedeal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em ciencias biológicas, Natal. 85p. (unpublished thesis). de Izarra, D. C. 1972. Fauna colembologica de isla Victoria (provincia de Neuquen, Argentina). III. Familias Isotomidae y Entomobryidae. Physis. Denis, J. R. 1924. Sur la faune français des Aptérygotes (V) (Note préliminaire) [Collembola included]., Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, Séance du 26 novembre 1924, p.197-199. Denis, J.R. 1931. Collemboles de Costa Rica avec une contribution au species de l'orde., Contribution alla conoscenza del "MICROGENTON" di Costa Rica, II., Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 25, p.69,111-120 of 69-170. Ellis, W.N. 1967. Studies on neotropical Collembola, I. Some Collembola from Guatemala., Beaufortia, Volume 14, No. 171, August 15, 1967, p.93-107. Fitzhugh, K. 2006. The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoologica scripta, 35(3), 261-286. Fjellberg, A. 1999. The labial palp in Collembola. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 237, 309–330. Folsom, J. W. 1933. The economic importance of Collembola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 26(5): 934-939. Folsom, J.W. 1927. Insects of the subclass Apterygota from Central America and the West Indies. No. 2702. - From the Proceedings of the United States National Museum, Vol.72, Washington, p.1-16. Gange, A. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Collembola and plant growth. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(9), 369-372. Gisin, H. 1964. Collemboles d’Europe VII. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 71(4), 649–678. Gisin, H. 1967. Espèces nouvelles et lignées évolutives de Pseudosinella endogés (Collembola). Memórias e Estudos do Museu Zoológico da. Universidade de Coimbra, 301, 6–25. González-Montaña, L. A. 2021. Collembola Anatomy Ontology. GitHub repository, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4660386. Gruia, M. 1983. Collemboles arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. II. Résultats des expéditions biospéologiques cubano-roumaines à Cuba, 4, p.191-205. Gruia, M. 1984. Collemboles Arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. III., Trav. Inst. Spéol. Emile Racovitza, t.XXIII, 1984, p.19-25. Handschin, E. 1927. Collembolen aus Costa Rica. Colémbolos de Costa Rica. Entomologische Mitteilungen, 16(2), 110-118. Hüther, W. 1971. Collembolen von einem Hamburger Müllplatz (Vorläufige Mitteilung)., Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg, 4. Band, Nr.72, 15. April 1971, p.157-165. Jacquemart, S. 1976. Collemboles nouveau des Iles Galápagos. Mission zoologique belge aux Iles Galápagos et en Ecuador (N. et J. Leleup, 1964-1965) Volume III, 1976. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. Brussel. p.137-157. Katz, A. D., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F.N. 2015. Operational criteria for cryptic species delimitation when evidence is limited, as exemplified by North American Entomobrya (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, p.1-23. Katz, A., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F. 2015. Taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of fifteen North American Entomobrya (Collembola, Entomobryidae), including four new species. ZooKeys, 525, 1. Kraepelin, K. 1901. Uber die durch den Schiffsverkehr in Hamburg eingeschleppten Tiere. Mitteilungen aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum in Hamburg, 18, 183–209. Mari Mutt, J. 1979. On the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray and Heteromuricus Imms (Collembola Entomobryidae)., Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol, 1979, 16 (4), p.541-546. Mari Mutt, J. A. 1983. Two new species of Lepidocyrtus from Paramo de Mucubaji Merida, Venezuela (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 1983, p.53-59. Mari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Puerto Rican species of Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 1986, p.1-48. Mari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Research Note. Comments on the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Carribean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No 3-4, 1986, p.215-217. Mari Mutt, J. A. 1987. Collembola from Two Localities Near Buenaventura, Colombia., Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 60 (3), 1987, p.364-379. Mari Mutt, J. A. 1988. Two New Species of Lepidocyrtus from Puerto Rico and descriptive Notes for L. ramosi Mari Mutt (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 24, No. 3-4,197-200. Mari Mutt, J. & Bellinger, P. 1990. A Catalog of the Neotropical Collembola, Including Nearctic Areas of Mexico., Florida. 1-237p. Marlier, G. 1945. Collemboles du Congo Belge. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 38: 3-4. Mateos, E. 2008. The European Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 1769(1), 35-59. Mateos, E. 2012. The European Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus group (Collembola: Entomobryidae), definition and description of a new species from Spain. Zootaxa, 3570(1), 69-81. Mateos, E., & Petersen, H. 2012. Definition of the European Lepidocyrtus curvicollis group (Collembola: Entomobryidae) with description of a new species from Sardinia (Italy). Zootaxa, 3273(1), 51-62. Mateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2015. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa, 4044(1), 105-129. Mateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2021. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) II: new Australian species. Zootaxa, 4981(2), 365-387. Mateos, E. & Winkler, D. 2018. New data clarifying the taxonomy of European members of the Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4429(3), 548-568. Mateos, E., Escuer, P., Buşmachiu, G., Riutort, M. & Álvarez-Presas, M. 2018. Untangling Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae): new molecular data shed light on the relationships of the European groups. Invertebrate Systematics, 32(3), 639-651. Mateos, E. 2020. European Lepidocyrtus lignorum-group, new findings and redescritpion of Lepidocyrtus pulchellus Denis, 1926 (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4790(3):564-576. Meyer-Wolfarth, F., Schrader, S., Oldenburg, E., Weinert, J., & Brunotte, J. 2017. Collembolans and soil nematodes as biological regulators of the plant pathogen Fusarium culmorum. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 124(5): 493-498. Mills, H. B. 1938. Collembola from Yucatan caves. Carnegie Institution of Washington. 183-196 pp. Pan, Z. X., Chatterjee, T., & Zhang, F. 2011. a new species of the genus Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 36(2), 231-236. Petersen, H. 2002. General aspects of collembolan ecology at the turn of the millennium. Pedobiologia, 46: 246–260. Potapov, M., Porco, D. & Deharveng, L. 2018. A new member of the genus Isotomurus from the Kuril Islands (Collembola: Isotomidae): returning to the problem of “colour pattern species”. 2018. Zootaxa, Magnolia Press, 4394 (3): 383-394. http://10.11646/zootaxa.4394.3.4. Potapov, A., Bellini, B., Chown, S., Deharveng, L., Janssens, F., Kováč, Ľ., Ponge, J., Potapov, M., Querner, P., Russel, D., Sun, X., Zhang, F. & Berg, M. 2020. Towards a global synthesis of Collembola knowledge: challenges and potential solutions. Soil Organisms, 92(3), 161-188. Reibe, K., Götz, K. P., Roß, C. L., Döring, T. F., Ellmer, F. & Ruess, L. 2015. Impact of quality and quantity of biochar and hydrochar on soil Collembola and growth of spring wheat. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 83: 84-87. Roatta, J., Acosta, D. L. & Acosta, A. 1989. Muestreo poblacional de Onychiurus armatus Tullberg (Collembola: Onychiuridae) en cultivos de clavel y crisantemo bajo invernadero. Agronomía Colombiana, 6(1-2): 64-70. Sabatini, M., & Innocenti, G. 2000. Functional relationships between Collembola and plant pathogenic fungi of agricultural soils. Pedobiologia, 44(3-4): 467-475. Schäffer, C. 1897. Apterygoten. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise Apterygoten 8: 1–48. Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods, 9(7): 671-675, PMID 22930834. Seastedt, T. R. 1984. The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annual review of entomology, 29(1): 25-46. Sechi, V., D'Annibale, A., Ambus, P., Sárossy, Z., Krogh, P. H., Eriksen, J., and Holmstrup, M. 2014. Collembola feeding habits and niche specialization in agricultural grasslands of different composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 74: 31-38. Sereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587. Soto‐Adames, F. N. 2000. Phylogeny of Neotropical Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae): first assessment of patterns of speciation in Puerto Rico and phylogenetic relevance of some subgeneric diagnostic characters. Systematic Entomology, 25(4), 485-502. Soto-Adames, F. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of the Puerto Rican Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Hexapoda: Collembola), a validation of Yoshii’s “color pattern species”. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 25(1): 27-42. Soto-Adames, F., Barra, J., Christiansen, K., & Jordana, R. 2008. Suprageneric classification of collembola Entomobryomorpha. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(3), 501-513. Soto-Adames, F. N. 2010. Two new species and descriptive notes for five Pseudosinella species (Hexapoda: Collembola: Entomobryidae) from West Virginian (USA) caves. Zootaxa, 2331(1), 1-34. Sousa, J., Bolger, T, da Gama, M., Lukkari, T., Ponge, J., Simön, C., Traser, G., Vanbergen, A., Brennan, A., Dubs, F., Ivitis, E., Keating, A., Stofer, S. & Watt, A. 2006. Changes in Collembola richness and diversity along a gradient of land-use intensity: a pan European study. Pedobiologia, 50: 147-156. South, A. 1961. The taxonomy of the British species of Entomobrya (Collembola). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 113: 387–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1961.tb00798.x. Szeptycki, A. 1972. Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola, III. Body chaetotaxy in the first instars of several genera of the Entomobryomorpha., Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, Tom XVII, Nr 15, Kraków, 30 XI 1972, p.341-372. Szeptycki, A. 1979. Chaetotaxy of the Entomobryidae and its phylogenetical significance, Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola IV, Kraków, p.1-218. Thibaud, J.M. & Najt, J. 1987. Collemboles (Insecta) de l'Equateur, II. Entomobryidae p.p., Cyphoderidae et Oncopoduridae, Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat, Paris, 4e série, 9, section A, no 4, 1987, p.933-946. Vogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T., & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3): 301-325. Wang, F., Chen, J.-X. & Christiansen, K. 2003. Taxonomy of the genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. (Collembola: Entomobryidae) in East and Southeast Asia and Malaysia, with description of a new species from the People's Republic of China. The Canadian Entomologist 135: 823–837. Willmann, R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, 86, 128. Winkler, D. 2017. New Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 from riverine woodland in Hungary (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4250(6), 529-540. Winkler, D. & Traser, G. 2012. Explanation of the European Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae), with description of new species from Hungary. Zootaxa, 3394(1), 35-47. Winkler, D., Mateos, E., Traser, G., Lakatos, F., & Tóth, V. 2020. New Insight into the Systematics of European Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae) Using Molecular and Morphological Data. Insects, 11(5), 302. Xu, G. L., Pan, Z. X., & Zhang, F. 2013. First record of Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959 (Collemobla, Entomobryidae) from Chinese mainland. ZooKeys, (260), 1. Yosii, R. 1959. Studies on the Collembolan Fauna of Malay and Singapore with special reference to the genera: Lobella, Lepidocyrtus and Callyntrura. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory Kyoto University, No.10, p.1-65. Yoshii, R. 1982. Lepidocyrtid Collembola of Sabah., Entomological Report from the Sabah Forest Research Centre No. 5, March 1982, p.1-47. Yoshii, R., 1989. On some Collembola of New Caledonia, with notes on the ‘‘colour pattern species’’. Contr. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ. 27, 233–259. Yoshii, R. & Suhardjono, Y.R. 1989. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its vicinities. I. Miscellaneous Notes, with special references to Seirini and Lepidocyrtini., Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.1, p.23-90. Yoshii, R. & Suhardjno, Y.R. 1992. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its Vicinities. II. Collembola of Irian Jaya and Maluku Islands, Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.2, 1992, August, p.1-52. Zhang, F., Chen, Z., Dong, R. R., Deharveng, L., Stevens, M. I., Huang, Y. H., & Zhu, C. D. 2014. Molecular phylogeny reveals independent origins of body scales in Entomobryidae (Hexapoda: Collembola). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 70, 231-239. Zhang, F. and Deharveng, L. 2015. Systematic revision of Entomobryidae (Collembola) by integrating molecular and new morphological evidence. Zoologica Scripta, 44(3): 298-311. Zhang, F., Yu, D., Stevens, M. I. & Ding, Y. 2019. Colouration, chaetotaxy and molecular data provide species-level resolution in a species complex of Dicranocentrus (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 32(6), 1298-1315. Amith, M., He, Z., Bian, J., Lossio-Ventura, J. A., & Tao, C. (2018). Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities. Journal of biomedical informatics, 80, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010. Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.7202/004006ar. Balhoff, J., Mikó, I., Yoder, M., Mullins, P. & Deans, A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia.Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt028. Bouzidi, R., De Nicola, A., Nader, F., & Chalal, R. 2019. OntoGamif: A modular ontology for integrated gamification. Applied Ontology, 14(3), 215-249. Cui, H., Xu, D., Chong, S., Ramirez, M., Rodenhausen, T., Macklin, J., Ludäscher, B., Morris, R., Soto, E. & Koch N. 2016. Introducing explorer of taxon concepts with a case study on spider measurement matrix building. BMC Bioinformatics, 17(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1352-7. Edgecombe, G. D. 2008. Anatomical nomenclature: homology, standardization and datasets. Zootaxa, 1950(1): 87-95. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1950.1.8. Faddeeva, A., Studer, R., Kraaijeveld, K., Sie, D., Ylstra, B., Mariën, J., op den Camp, H., Datema, E., den Dunnen, J., van Straalen, N. & Roelofs, D. 2015. Collembolan transcriptomes highlight molecular evolution of hexapods and provide clues on the adaptation to terrestrial life. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130600. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0130600. Glimm, B., Horrocks, I.,Motik, B. & Stoilos, G. 2010. Optimizing Ontology Classification. In: Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Yue Pan, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Mika, Lei Zhang, Jeff Z. Pan, Ian Horrocks, and Birte Glimm, editors, Proc. of the 9th Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 2010), volume 6496 of LNCS, pp. 225—240. Göpel, T. & Wirkner, C. 2018. Morphological description, character conceptualization and the reconstruction of ancestral states exemplified by the evolution of arthropod hearts. PloS one, 13(9), e0201702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201702. Haendel, M. A., Balhoff, J. P., Bastian, F. B., Blackburn, D. C., Blake, J., Bradford, Y., Comte, A., Dahdul, W. M., Dececchi, T. A., Druzinsky, R. E., Hayamizu, T. F., Ibrahim, N., Lewis, S. E., Mabee, P. M., Niknejad, A., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Sereno, P. C. & Mungall C. J. 2014. Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon. J. Biomed. Semant. 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-21. Jackson, R., Balhoff, J., Douglass, E., Harris, N., Mungall, C. & Overton, J. 2019. ROBOT: A tool for automating ontology workflows. BMC bioinformatics, 20(1): 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3002-3. Kalet, I. 2009. Modeling Biological Structure, pp. 303-323. In: Kalet, I. (Eds), Principles of Biomedical Informatics, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369438-6.00011-8. Keet, C. 2013. Granularity. In: Dubitzky W., Wolkenhauer O., Cho KH., Yokota H. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_65. Mabee, P. M., Ashburner, M., Cronk, Q., Gkoutos, G. V., Haendel, M., Segerdell, E., Mungall, C. & Westerfield, M. 2007. Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.013. Mabee, P., Balhoff, J., Dahdul, W., Lapp, H., Mungall, C. & Vision, T. 2020. A logical model of homology for comparative biology. Systematic Biology, 69(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz067. Mikó, I., Masner, L., Johannes, E., Yoder, M. & Deans, A. 2013. Male terminalia of Ceraphronoidea: morphological diversity in an otherwise monotonous taxon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 44(3-4), 261-347. http://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-04402002. Mullins, P., Kawada, R., Balhoff, J. & Deans, A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.223.3572. Mungall, C., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G., Lewis, S. & Haendel, M. 2012. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biology, 13(1), R5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5. Musen, M. A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4). http://doi.org/10.1145/2557001.25757003. Noy, N. & McGuinness, D. 2001. “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology,” Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Tech. Rep., http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ ontology development/ontology101.pdf. O’Leary, M. & Kaufman, S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5):529-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.x. Richter, S. & Wirkner, C. 2014. A research program for Evolutionary Morphology. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 52(4), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12061. Smith, B. & Varzi, A. (2000). Bona Fide and Fiat Boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(2):401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653492. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A. & Rosse, C. 2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W. Goldberg, L., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C., The OBI Consortium, Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Rutterberg, A., Sansone, S., Scheuermann, R., Shah, N., Whetzel, P. & Lewis, S. 2007. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biol. 25:1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1346. Topalis, P., Tzavlaki, C., Vestaki, K., Dialynas, E., Sonenshine, D. E., Butler, R., Bruggner, R., Stinson, E., Collins, F. & Louis, C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect molecular biology, 17(1), 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x. Travillian, R., Malone, J., Pang, C., Hancock, J., Holland, P. W. H., Schofield, P. & Parkinson H. (2011). The vertebrate bridging ontology (VBO). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (Bio-Ontologies 2011); 2011 July 26–30; Buffalo,NewYork. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org). Trietsch, C, Mikó, I, Notton, D. & Deans, A. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e22676. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676. Vogt, L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12179. Vogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T. & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics,26(3), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x. Vogt, L. 2019. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6 Wirkner, C., Göpel, T., Runge, J., Keiler, J., Klussmann-Fricke, B., Huckstorf, K., Scholz, S., Mikó, I., Yoder, M. & Richter, S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768. http://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw108. Yoder, M. J., Mikó, I., Seltmann, K. C., Bertone, M. A. & Deans, A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015991. Yu, L. 2014. A developer’s guide to the semantic Web. Springer Science & Business Media. 829p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43796-4. Antoniou G, Van Harmelen F. A. 2004. semantic web primer. MIT press. 288p. Balhoff J, Dahdul W, Kothari C, Lapp H, Lundberg J, Mabee P, Midford P, Westerfield, M., Vision, T. 2021. Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity. PLoS One, 5(5), e10500, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010500 Balhoff J, Mikó I, Yoder M, Mullins P, Deans A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia. Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt028 Bellinger PF, Christiansen KA, Janssens F. 1996– 2017. Checklist of the Collembola of the World. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (Accessed 27 April 2021), 2021. Burks K, Miko I, Deans A. Dendrocerus mexicali (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea, Megaspilidae): Novel antennal morphology, first description of female, and expansion of known range into the US. ZooKeys, (569), 53, 2016. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.569.6629 Cui HO. 2008. Converting taxonomic descriptions to new digital formats. Biodiversity Informatics, 5(0). doi: 10.1.1.662.9637 Cui HO. 2012. CharaParser for fine‐grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618 Cui HO, Dahdul W, Dececchi A, Ibrahim N, Mabee P, Balhoff J, Gopalakrishnan H. 2015. CharaParser+ EQ: Performance evaluation without gold standard. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1):1-10, doi: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010020 Cui, HO, Zhang L, Ford B, Cheng HL, Macklin JA, Reznicek A, Starr J. 2021. Measurement Recorder: developing a useful tool for making species descriptions that produces computable phenotypes. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baaa079 Dahdul W, Dececchi TA, Ibrahim N, Lapp H, Mabee P. 2015. Moving the mountain: analysis of the effort required to transform comparative anatomy into computable anatomy. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/bav040 Dallwitz M J. 1980. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon, 29(1), 41-46, doi: 10.2307/1219595 De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M. Tbox and Abox reasoning in expressive description logics. 1996. In: Proceedings of KR-96, pages 316–327. M. Kaufmann, Los Altos. DuCharme B. 2013. Learning SPARQL: querying and updating with SPARQL 1.1. O'Reilly Media, Inc. Eliason C. M., Edwards S. V., Clarke J. A. 2019. Phenotools: An R package for visualizing and analysing phenomic datasets. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(9), 1393-1400, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13217. Frey J, Müller K, Hellmann S, Rahm E, & Vidal M. 2019. Evaluation of metadata representations in RDF stores. Semantic Web, 10(2), 205-229, doi: 10.3233/SW-180307. Girón, J. C., Mikó, I., Gonzalez-Montaña, L. A., Tarasov, S. & Matentzoglu, N. (2021, August 11). Ontology for the Anatomy of the Insect SkeletoMuscular system (AISM) v2021-08-11. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4660322 Grumbling G, Strelets V. 2006. FlyBase: anatomical data, images, and queries. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(suppl. 1), D484-D488. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj068. Hong C. 2012. CharaParser for fine-grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(4):738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618. Mahner M. & Bunge M. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. 445p. Mikó I, Copeland R, Balhoff J, Yoder M, Deans A. 2014. Folding wings like a cockroach: a review of transverse wing folding ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae: Afrevania and Trissevania). PLoS One, 9(5), e94056,. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094056. Mikó I, Trietsch C, Sandall E, Yoder M, Hines H, Deans A. 2016. Malagasy Conostigmus (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) and the secret of scutes. PeerJ, 4, e2682. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2682. Mullins P, Kawada R, Balhoff J, Deans A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.223.3572 Mungall C. 2007. Representing Phenotypes in OWL. Conference: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria, June 6-7 Musen M., A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4), doi: 10.1145/2557001.25757003 Leggio B, Laussu J, Carlier A, Godin C, Lemaire P, Faure E. 2019. MorphoNet: an interactive online morphological browser to explore complex multi-scale data. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-8, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10668-1 O’Leary MA, Kaufman S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5), 529-537, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.x Paterson T, Kennedy JB, Pullan M, Cannon A, Armstrong K, Watson M, Raguenaud C, McDonald S, Russell G. 2004. A universal character model and ontology of defined terms for taxonomic description. In: International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (pp. 63-78). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24745-6_5. Sereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x. Ramírez M. J. & Michalik P. 2019. The spider anatomy ontology (SPD)—a versatile tool to link anatomy with cross-disciplinary data. Diversity, 11(10), 202, doi: 10.3390/d11100202. Silva T. & Feitosa, R. 2019. Using controlled vocabularies in anatomical terminology: A case study with Strumigenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arthropod structure & development, 52, 100877, doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2019.100877. Tarasov S. Integration of anatomy ontologies and evo-devo using structured Markov models suggests a new framework for modeling discrete phenotypic traits. Systematic Biology, 68(5), 698-716, 2020. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz005. Thessen A, Cui, H. & Mozzherin D. 2012. Applications of natural language processing in biodiversity science. Advances in Bioinformatics, 391574, doi: 10.1155/2012/391574. Topalis P, Tzavlaki C, Vestaki K, Dialynas E, Sonenshine D, Butler R, Bruggner R, Stinson E, Collins F, Louis C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect Molecular Biology, 17(1), 87-89, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x. Trietsch C, Mikó I, Notton D. G. & Deans A. R. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal, (6), doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676. Vogt L. 2019b. Morphological descriptions in times of eScience: instance-based versus class-based semantic representations of anatomy, 2019a. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28314.29124. Vogt L. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14, doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6. Vogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Köhler C, Meid, Quast B, Grobe P. 2019. SOCCOMAS: a FAIR web content management system that uses knowledge graphs and that is based on semantic programming. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baz067. Vogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Grobe P, Köhler C, Meid S. Semantic Morph D Base (Prototype). n.d.. Available: https://proto.morphdbase.de/. Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T. & Giribe G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3), 301-325, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x. Vogt L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters, and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539, doi: 10.1111/cla.12179 Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes A, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo C, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Growth P, Goble C, Grethe J, Heringa J, Hoen P, Hooft R, Kuhn T. Kok R, Kok J, Lusher S, Martone M, Mons A, Packer A, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, Schaik R, Sansone S, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz M, Thompson M, van der Lei J, Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg A, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1), 1-9, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 Willmann R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. In: The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Eds. D. Williams, M. Schmitt, and Q. Wheeler. Published by Cambridge University Press. Wirkner C, Göpel T, Runge J, Keiler J, Klussmann-Fricke B, Huckstorf K, Scholz S, Mikó S, Yoder M. Richter S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw108 Wood M, Lydon S, Tablan V. Maynard D, & Cunningham H. 2003. Using parallel texts to improve recall in IE. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP ’03), pp. 505–512, Borovetz, Bulgaria. Yoder M.J., Mikó I, Seltmann K.C., Bertone M. A. & Deans A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015991. Yoder M, Twidale M, Thomer A, Vogt L, Franz N, Guo J, Deans A. & Balhoff J. 2018. Taxonomy, and the production of semantic phenotypes. In: Application of Semantic Technology in Biodiversity Science Anne E. Thessen (Ed.). IOS Press /AKA Verlag, pp. 53–77.
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	401 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá - Ciencias Agrarias - Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias
dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv	Escuela de posgrados
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
institution	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/3/7172108.2022.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/4/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/5/7172108.2022.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	2ced0c50789affecc5c112374df5c634 8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2 47df6b48d6a3cdb29cd803534146dccc
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_	1814090196285652992
spelling	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Rueda Ramirez, Diana Marcela40514968e1f2971a17a463ca3a5b64a0Gaigl, Andreas0c72a8246c588be1454443db1652fbeeGonzález Montaña, Luis Antonioed517aedf9a7a525e47f14d3801d76c92022-04-05T22:01:44Z2022-04-05T22:01:44Z2021-04-04https://github.com/luis-gonzalez-mhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81441Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, fotografías, graficas, tablasLepidocyrtus with almost 265 species described, is the largest genus of Entomobryidae, defined by 8+8 eyes, rounded scales, and bidentate mucro. The genus is taxonomically problematic because of the lack of taxonomic characters to discriminate species, or available to subgenus level. This obeys to incomplete morphological descriptions, and taxonomy based mainly on European or Asian species, which difficult, in this case, the taxonomic study of the Neotropical species. Morphological descriptions are not free of problems, related mainly to the lack of standardized anatomical terminology, required in the formalization and standardization of morphological descriptions. Due to the above, this study addresses two main objectives: 1) to review the taxonomy of the Neotropical species of the genus Lepidocyrtus, which includes the extension of previous descriptions, and description of new species. As well as the definition of groups of species and taxonomic location within subgenera; 2) to incorporate semantic methods for morphological descriptions, which includes the presentation of an anatomical ontology for Collembola (Collembola Anatomy Ontology, CLAO) and the evaluation of semantic methods based on RDF (Resource Description Framework).The examined species come from biological collections or field work, whose morphological descriptions expressed in natural language and RDF triples. In total, 52 species were examined with definition of 17 species groups based chaetotaxy, vestiture, dental tubercle, and apical bulb., As a result of the review, nineteen new species are also. Likewise, the examined species were located within the subgenera Lanocyrtus, Fractocyrtus, Ascocyrtus, Lepidocyrtus s.str., and Acrocyrtus. An Collembola Anatomy Ontology (CLAO) was developed together with the implementation of semantic methods for the morphological description of the Neotropical species of Lepidocyrtus. The morphology of Lepidocyrtus shows little variation; however, the chaetotaxy is still the main source of taxonomic characters. The proposal of groups of species contributes to the organization of the genus, but at the subgenus level a phylogenetic exploration can contribute to the delimitation of these. The anatomical ontology is a promising tool in morphological data management, which needs development in the future.Lepidocyrtus con cerca de 265 especies descritas es el género más grande de Entomobryidae, el cual es definido por el número de ocelos 8+8, escamas redondeadas, y mucrón bidentado. El género es taxonómicamente problemático debido a la carencia de caracteres taxonómicos para la delimitación de especies, o en la designación dentro de subgéneros. Lo anterior obedece a descripciones morfológicas incompletas, y taxonomía basada únicamente en especies europeas o asiáticas, lo cual dificulta, en este caso, el estudio taxonómico de las especies Neotropicales. Las descripciones morfológicas tampoco son libres de problemas, los cuales están relacionados a la falta de una terminología anatómica estandarizada requerida en la formalización y estandarización de descripciones morfológicas. Debido a lo anterior, este estudio aborda dos objetivos principales: 1) Revisar la taxonomía de las especies Neotropicales del género Lepidocyrtus, lo cual incluye la extensión de descripciones previas, y descripción de nuevas especies. Así como la definición de grupos de especies y ubicación taxonómica dentro de subgéneros; 2) Incorporar métodos semánticos para descripciones morfológicas, lo cual incluye la presentación de una ontología anatómica para Collembola (Collembola Anatomy Ontology, CLAO) y la evaluación de métodos semánticos basados sobre RDF (Resource Description Framework). Las especies examinadas proviene de colecciones biológicas o trabajo de campo, cuyas descripciones morfológicas fueron expresadas en lenguaje natural y tripletes RDF. En total, 52 especies fueron revisadas con la definición de 17 grupos de especies basados sobre la quetotaxia, vestidura, tubérculo dental, y bulbo apical. Como resultado de la revisión se proponen también 19 nuevas especies. Así mismo, las especies examinadas fueron ubicadas en los subgéneros Lanocyrtus, Fractocyrtus, Ascocyrtus, Lepidocyrtus s.str., y Acrocyrtus. Una ontología anatómica para Collembola (CLAO) fue desarrollada junto a la implementación de métodos semánticos para la descripción morfológica de las especies neotropicales de Lepidocyrtus. La morfología de Lepidocyrtus muestra poca variación; sin embargo, la quetotaxia sigue siendo la principal fuente de caracteres taxonómicos. La propuesta de grupos de especies contribuye a la organización del género, pero a nivel de subgénero una exploración filogenética puede contribuir a la delimitación de estos. Las ontologías anatómicas son una herramienta prometedora en la gestión de datos morfológicos, lo cual necesita mayor desarrollo hacia el futuro. (Texto tomado de la fuente)Minciencias, Doctorados Nacionales 727DoctoradoDoctor en Ciencias AgrariasEntomología401 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ciencias Agrarias - Doctorado en Ciencias AgrariasEscuela de posgradosFacultad de Ciencias AgrariasBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá590 - Animales::592 - InvertebradosCollembolaRegión neotropicalontología anatómicatripletes RDFmétodos semánticosHexapodaAnatomy ontologyRDF tripletSemantic-based methodsTaxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptionsRevisión taxonómica del género Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) para la región neotropical e inclusión de ontologías en descripciones morfológicasTrabajo de grado - Doctoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDBardgett, R. D. 2002. Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil. Zoology, 105(4), 367-375.Baquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2014. Singular fauna of Entomobryidae (Collembola) from" Land of Passes" in the Himalayas, India. Florida Entomologist, 1554-1587.Baquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2015. Entomobryoidea (Collembola) from Himachal Pradesh (India) in the Himalayas. Zootaxa, 4027(1), 1-41.Bellinger, P.F., Christiansen, K.A. & Janssens, F. 2021 Checklist of the Collembola of the World. 1996– 2021. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (accessed 10 June 2021).Bellini, B. C., Cipola, N. G., & Godeiro, N. N. 2015. New species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet and Entomobrya Rondani (Collembola: Entomobryoidea: Entomobryidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 4027(2), 227-242.Beruete, E., Baquero, E. & Jordana, R. 2002. New species of Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae) from karst caves of the Basque bio-speleologic district., Ann. Soc. entomol. Fr. (n.s.), 2002, 38 (4), p.385-398.Börner, C. 1913. Die Familien der Collembolen. Zool. Anz. 41: 315-322.Bourlet, C. 1839. Mémoire sur les Podures., Mémoires de la Société Royale des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts, de Lille, Année 1839, p.377-418.Brennan, A., Fortune, T., and Bolger, T. 2006. Collembola abundances and assemblage structures in conventionally tilled and conservation tillage arable systems. Pedobiologia, 50(2): 135-145.Carapelli, A., Frati, F., Fanciulli, P. & Dallai, R. 2001. Taxonomic revision of 14 south-western European species of Isotomurus (Collembola, Isotomidae), with description of four new species and the designation of the neotype for I. palustris. Zoologica Scripta, 30, 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2001.00055.x.Carpenter, G. 1916. Iles Seychelles. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 28-58.Christiansen K. 1954. Ratios as a means of specific differentiation in Collembola. Entomological News 65: 177–178.Christiansen, K. 1958. The Entomobryiforrn Male Genital Plate. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 65, 1:474-476.Christiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1991. Phylogeny of the Hawaiian species of the genus Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Revue d'Écologie et de Biologie du Sol, 28 (2), 207–215.Christiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1998. The Collembola of North America North of the Rio Grande, A taxonomic analysis., Grinnell College, Iowa, p.1-1520.Cipola, N. G., Morais, J. W. & Bellini, B. C. 2017. The discovery of Lepidocyrtoides Schött, 1917 (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Entomobryinae) from the New World, including three new species from Brazil and one from Australia. Zootaxa, 4324(2), 201-248.Cipola, N. G., de Morais, J. W., & Bellini, B. C. 2019. New subgenus and four species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Lepidocyrtinae) from Amazon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 50(2), 189-234.Cipola, N., Oliveira, J., Bellini, B., Ferreira, A., Lima, E., Brito, R. & Stievano, L. 2020. Review of eyeless Pseudosinella Schäffer (Collembola, Entomobryidae, and Lepidocyrtinae) from Brazilian caves. Insects, 11-194. doi:10.3390/insects11030194.Cucini, C., Fanciulli, P. P., Frati, F., Convey, P., Nardi, F., & Carapelli, A. 2021. Re-evaluating the internal phylogenetic relationships of Collembola by means of mitogenome data. Genes, 12(1), 44.Culik, M., de Souza, J., & Ventura, J. 2002. Biodiversity of Collembola in tropical agricultural environments of Espı́ritu Santo, Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 21(1): 49-58.Daston, L., 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc. Stud. Sci. 22, 597–618.Deharveng, L. 2004. Recent advances in Collembola systematics. Pedobiologia, 48(5-6), 415-433.De Freitas, T. 2016. Novas espécies de Entomobryoidea, Womersley, 1934 (Collembola, Hexapoda) em duas áreas de caatinga do Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Fedeal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em ciencias biológicas, Natal. 85p. (unpublished thesis).de Izarra, D. C. 1972. Fauna colembologica de isla Victoria (provincia de Neuquen, Argentina). III. Familias Isotomidae y Entomobryidae. Physis.Denis, J. R. 1924. Sur la faune français des Aptérygotes (V) (Note préliminaire) [Collembola included]., Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, Séance du 26 novembre 1924, p.197-199.Denis, J.R. 1931. Collemboles de Costa Rica avec une contribution au species de l'orde., Contribution alla conoscenza del "MICROGENTON" di Costa Rica, II., Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 25, p.69,111-120 of 69-170.Ellis, W.N. 1967. Studies on neotropical Collembola, I. Some Collembola from Guatemala., Beaufortia, Volume 14, No. 171, August 15, 1967, p.93-107.Fitzhugh, K. 2006. The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoologica scripta, 35(3), 261-286.Fjellberg, A. 1999. The labial palp in Collembola. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 237, 309–330.Folsom, J. W. 1933. The economic importance of Collembola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 26(5): 934-939.Folsom, J.W. 1927. Insects of the subclass Apterygota from Central America and the West Indies. No. 2702. - From the Proceedings of the United States National Museum, Vol.72, Washington, p.1-16.Gange, A. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Collembola and plant growth. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(9), 369-372.Gisin, H. 1964. Collemboles d’Europe VII. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 71(4), 649–678.Gisin, H. 1967. Espèces nouvelles et lignées évolutives de Pseudosinella endogés (Collembola). Memórias e Estudos do Museu Zoológico da. Universidade de Coimbra, 301, 6–25.González-Montaña, L. A. 2021. Collembola Anatomy Ontology. GitHub repository, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4660386.Gruia, M. 1983. Collemboles arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. II. Résultats des expéditions biospéologiques cubano-roumaines à Cuba, 4, p.191-205.Gruia, M. 1984. Collemboles Arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. III., Trav. Inst. Spéol. Emile Racovitza, t.XXIII, 1984, p.19-25.Handschin, E. 1927. Collembolen aus Costa Rica. Colémbolos de Costa Rica. Entomologische Mitteilungen, 16(2), 110-118.Hüther, W. 1971. Collembolen von einem Hamburger Müllplatz (Vorläufige Mitteilung)., Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg, 4. Band, Nr.72, 15. April 1971, p.157-165.Jacquemart, S. 1976. Collemboles nouveau des Iles Galápagos. Mission zoologique belge aux Iles Galápagos et en Ecuador (N. et J. Leleup, 1964-1965) Volume III, 1976. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. Brussel. p.137-157.Katz, A. D., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F.N. 2015. Operational criteria for cryptic species delimitation when evidence is limited, as exemplified by North American Entomobrya (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, p.1-23.Katz, A., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F. 2015. Taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of fifteen North American Entomobrya (Collembola, Entomobryidae), including four new species. ZooKeys, 525, 1.Kraepelin, K. 1901. Uber die durch den Schiffsverkehr in Hamburg eingeschleppten Tiere. Mitteilungen aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum in Hamburg, 18, 183–209.Mari Mutt, J. 1979. On the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray and Heteromuricus Imms (Collembola Entomobryidae)., Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol, 1979, 16 (4), p.541-546.Mari Mutt, J. A. 1983. Two new species of Lepidocyrtus from Paramo de Mucubaji Merida, Venezuela (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 1983, p.53-59.Mari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Puerto Rican species of Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 1986, p.1-48.Mari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Research Note. Comments on the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Carribean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No 3-4, 1986, p.215-217.Mari Mutt, J. A. 1987. Collembola from Two Localities Near Buenaventura, Colombia., Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 60 (3), 1987, p.364-379.Mari Mutt, J. A. 1988. Two New Species of Lepidocyrtus from Puerto Rico and descriptive Notes for L. ramosi Mari Mutt (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 24, No. 3-4,197-200.Mari Mutt, J. & Bellinger, P. 1990. A Catalog of the Neotropical Collembola, Including Nearctic Areas of Mexico., Florida. 1-237p.Marlier, G. 1945. Collemboles du Congo Belge. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 38: 3-4.Mateos, E. 2008. The European Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 1769(1), 35-59.Mateos, E. 2012. The European Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus group (Collembola: Entomobryidae), definition and description of a new species from Spain. Zootaxa, 3570(1), 69-81.Mateos, E., & Petersen, H. 2012. Definition of the European Lepidocyrtus curvicollis group (Collembola: Entomobryidae) with description of a new species from Sardinia (Italy). Zootaxa, 3273(1), 51-62.Mateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2015. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa, 4044(1), 105-129.Mateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2021. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) II: new Australian species. Zootaxa, 4981(2), 365-387.Mateos, E. & Winkler, D. 2018. New data clarifying the taxonomy of European members of the Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4429(3), 548-568.Mateos, E., Escuer, P., Buşmachiu, G., Riutort, M. & Álvarez-Presas, M. 2018. Untangling Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae): new molecular data shed light on the relationships of the European groups. Invertebrate Systematics, 32(3), 639-651.Mateos, E. 2020. European Lepidocyrtus lignorum-group, new findings and redescritpion of Lepidocyrtus pulchellus Denis, 1926 (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4790(3):564-576.Meyer-Wolfarth, F., Schrader, S., Oldenburg, E., Weinert, J., & Brunotte, J. 2017. Collembolans and soil nematodes as biological regulators of the plant pathogen Fusarium culmorum. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 124(5): 493-498.Mills, H. B. 1938. Collembola from Yucatan caves. Carnegie Institution of Washington. 183-196 pp.Pan, Z. X., Chatterjee, T., & Zhang, F. 2011. a new species of the genus Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 36(2), 231-236.Petersen, H. 2002. General aspects of collembolan ecology at the turn of the millennium. Pedobiologia, 46: 246–260.Potapov, M., Porco, D. & Deharveng, L. 2018. A new member of the genus Isotomurus from the Kuril Islands (Collembola: Isotomidae): returning to the problem of “colour pattern species”. 2018. Zootaxa, Magnolia Press, 4394 (3): 383-394. http://10.11646/zootaxa.4394.3.4.Potapov, A., Bellini, B., Chown, S., Deharveng, L., Janssens, F., Kováč, Ľ., Ponge, J., Potapov, M., Querner, P., Russel, D., Sun, X., Zhang, F. & Berg, M. 2020. Towards a global synthesis of Collembola knowledge: challenges and potential solutions. Soil Organisms, 92(3), 161-188.Reibe, K., Götz, K. P., Roß, C. L., Döring, T. F., Ellmer, F. & Ruess, L. 2015. Impact of quality and quantity of biochar and hydrochar on soil Collembola and growth of spring wheat. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 83: 84-87.Roatta, J., Acosta, D. L. & Acosta, A. 1989. Muestreo poblacional de Onychiurus armatus Tullberg (Collembola: Onychiuridae) en cultivos de clavel y crisantemo bajo invernadero. Agronomía Colombiana, 6(1-2): 64-70.Sabatini, M., & Innocenti, G. 2000. Functional relationships between Collembola and plant pathogenic fungi of agricultural soils. Pedobiologia, 44(3-4): 467-475.Schäffer, C. 1897. Apterygoten. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise Apterygoten 8: 1–48.Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods, 9(7): 671-675, PMID 22930834.Seastedt, T. R. 1984. The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annual review of entomology, 29(1): 25-46.Sechi, V., D'Annibale, A., Ambus, P., Sárossy, Z., Krogh, P. H., Eriksen, J., and Holmstrup, M. 2014. Collembola feeding habits and niche specialization in agricultural grasslands of different composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 74: 31-38.Sereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587.Soto‐Adames, F. N. 2000. Phylogeny of Neotropical Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae): first assessment of patterns of speciation in Puerto Rico and phylogenetic relevance of some subgeneric diagnostic characters. Systematic Entomology, 25(4), 485-502.Soto-Adames, F. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of the Puerto Rican Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Hexapoda: Collembola), a validation of Yoshii’s “color pattern species”. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 25(1): 27-42.Soto-Adames, F., Barra, J., Christiansen, K., & Jordana, R. 2008. Suprageneric classification of collembola Entomobryomorpha. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(3), 501-513.Soto-Adames, F. N. 2010. Two new species and descriptive notes for five Pseudosinella species (Hexapoda: Collembola: Entomobryidae) from West Virginian (USA) caves. Zootaxa, 2331(1), 1-34.Sousa, J., Bolger, T, da Gama, M., Lukkari, T., Ponge, J., Simön, C., Traser, G., Vanbergen, A., Brennan, A., Dubs, F., Ivitis, E., Keating, A., Stofer, S. & Watt, A. 2006. Changes in Collembola richness and diversity along a gradient of land-use intensity: a pan European study. Pedobiologia, 50: 147-156.South, A. 1961. The taxonomy of the British species of Entomobrya (Collembola). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 113: 387–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1961.tb00798.x.Szeptycki, A. 1972. Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola, III. Body chaetotaxy in the first instars of several genera of the Entomobryomorpha., Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, Tom XVII, Nr 15, Kraków, 30 XI 1972, p.341-372.Szeptycki, A. 1979. Chaetotaxy of the Entomobryidae and its phylogenetical significance, Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola IV, Kraków, p.1-218.Thibaud, J.M. & Najt, J. 1987. Collemboles (Insecta) de l'Equateur, II. Entomobryidae p.p., Cyphoderidae et Oncopoduridae, Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat, Paris, 4e série, 9, section A, no 4, 1987, p.933-946.Vogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T., & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3): 301-325.Wang, F., Chen, J.-X. & Christiansen, K. 2003. Taxonomy of the genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. (Collembola: Entomobryidae) in East and Southeast Asia and Malaysia, with description of a new species from the People's Republic of China. The Canadian Entomologist 135: 823–837.Willmann, R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, 86, 128.Winkler, D. 2017. New Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 from riverine woodland in Hungary (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4250(6), 529-540.Winkler, D. & Traser, G. 2012. Explanation of the European Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae), with description of new species from Hungary. Zootaxa, 3394(1), 35-47.Winkler, D., Mateos, E., Traser, G., Lakatos, F., & Tóth, V. 2020. New Insight into the Systematics of European Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae) Using Molecular and Morphological Data. Insects, 11(5), 302.Xu, G. L., Pan, Z. X., & Zhang, F. 2013. First record of Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959 (Collemobla, Entomobryidae) from Chinese mainland. ZooKeys, (260), 1.Yosii, R. 1959. Studies on the Collembolan Fauna of Malay and Singapore with special reference to the genera: Lobella, Lepidocyrtus and Callyntrura. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory Kyoto University, No.10, p.1-65.Yoshii, R. 1982. Lepidocyrtid Collembola of Sabah., Entomological Report from the Sabah Forest Research Centre No. 5, March 1982, p.1-47.Yoshii, R., 1989. On some Collembola of New Caledonia, with notes on the ‘‘colour pattern species’’. Contr. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ. 27, 233–259.Yoshii, R. & Suhardjono, Y.R. 1989. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its vicinities. I. Miscellaneous Notes, with special references to Seirini and Lepidocyrtini., Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.1, p.23-90.Yoshii, R. & Suhardjno, Y.R. 1992. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its Vicinities. II. Collembola of Irian Jaya and Maluku Islands, Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.2, 1992, August, p.1-52.Zhang, F., Chen, Z., Dong, R. R., Deharveng, L., Stevens, M. I., Huang, Y. H., & Zhu, C. D. 2014. Molecular phylogeny reveals independent origins of body scales in Entomobryidae (Hexapoda: Collembola). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 70, 231-239.Zhang, F. and Deharveng, L. 2015. Systematic revision of Entomobryidae (Collembola) by integrating molecular and new morphological evidence. Zoologica Scripta, 44(3): 298-311.Zhang, F., Yu, D., Stevens, M. I. & Ding, Y. 2019. Colouration, chaetotaxy and molecular data provide species-level resolution in a species complex of Dicranocentrus (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 32(6), 1298-1315.Amith, M., He, Z., Bian, J., Lossio-Ventura, J. A., & Tao, C. (2018). Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities. Journal of biomedical informatics, 80, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010.Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.7202/004006ar.Balhoff, J., Mikó, I., Yoder, M., Mullins, P. & Deans, A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia.Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt028.Bouzidi, R., De Nicola, A., Nader, F., & Chalal, R. 2019. OntoGamif: A modular ontology for integrated gamification. Applied Ontology, 14(3), 215-249.Cui, H., Xu, D., Chong, S., Ramirez, M., Rodenhausen, T., Macklin, J., Ludäscher, B., Morris, R., Soto, E. & Koch N. 2016. Introducing explorer of taxon concepts with a case study on spider measurement matrix building. BMC Bioinformatics, 17(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1352-7.Edgecombe, G. D. 2008. Anatomical nomenclature: homology, standardization and datasets. Zootaxa, 1950(1): 87-95. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1950.1.8.Faddeeva, A., Studer, R., Kraaijeveld, K., Sie, D., Ylstra, B., Mariën, J., op den Camp, H., Datema, E., den Dunnen, J., van Straalen, N. & Roelofs, D. 2015. Collembolan transcriptomes highlight molecular evolution of hexapods and provide clues on the adaptation to terrestrial life. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130600. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0130600.Glimm, B., Horrocks, I.,Motik, B. & Stoilos, G. 2010. Optimizing Ontology Classification. In: Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Yue Pan, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Mika, Lei Zhang, Jeff Z. Pan, Ian Horrocks, and Birte Glimm, editors, Proc. of the 9th Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 2010), volume 6496 of LNCS, pp. 225—240.Göpel, T. & Wirkner, C. 2018. Morphological description, character conceptualization and the reconstruction of ancestral states exemplified by the evolution of arthropod hearts. PloS one, 13(9), e0201702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201702.Haendel, M. A., Balhoff, J. P., Bastian, F. B., Blackburn, D. C., Blake, J., Bradford, Y., Comte, A., Dahdul, W. M., Dececchi, T. A., Druzinsky, R. E., Hayamizu, T. F., Ibrahim, N., Lewis, S. E., Mabee, P. M., Niknejad, A., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Sereno, P. C. & Mungall C. J. 2014. Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon. J. Biomed. Semant. 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-21.Jackson, R., Balhoff, J., Douglass, E., Harris, N., Mungall, C. & Overton, J. 2019. ROBOT: A tool for automating ontology workflows. BMC bioinformatics, 20(1): 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3002-3.Kalet, I. 2009. Modeling Biological Structure, pp. 303-323. In: Kalet, I. (Eds), Principles of Biomedical Informatics, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369438-6.00011-8.Keet, C. 2013. Granularity. In: Dubitzky W., Wolkenhauer O., Cho KH., Yokota H. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_65.Mabee, P. M., Ashburner, M., Cronk, Q., Gkoutos, G. V., Haendel, M., Segerdell, E., Mungall, C. & Westerfield, M. 2007. Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.013.Mabee, P., Balhoff, J., Dahdul, W., Lapp, H., Mungall, C. & Vision, T. 2020. A logical model of homology for comparative biology. Systematic Biology, 69(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz067.Mikó, I., Masner, L., Johannes, E., Yoder, M. & Deans, A. 2013. Male terminalia of Ceraphronoidea: morphological diversity in an otherwise monotonous taxon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 44(3-4), 261-347. http://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-04402002.Mullins, P., Kawada, R., Balhoff, J. & Deans, A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.223.3572.Mungall, C., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G., Lewis, S. & Haendel, M. 2012. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biology, 13(1), R5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5.Musen, M. A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4). http://doi.org/10.1145/2557001.25757003.Noy, N. & McGuinness, D. 2001. “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology,” Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Tech. Rep., http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ ontology development/ontology101.pdf.O’Leary, M. & Kaufman, S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5):529-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.x.Richter, S. & Wirkner, C. 2014. A research program for Evolutionary Morphology. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 52(4), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12061.Smith, B. & Varzi, A. (2000). Bona Fide and Fiat Boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(2):401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653492.Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A. & Rosse, C. 2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46.Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W. Goldberg, L., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C., The OBI Consortium, Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Rutterberg, A., Sansone, S., Scheuermann, R., Shah, N., Whetzel, P. & Lewis, S. 2007. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biol. 25:1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1346.Topalis, P., Tzavlaki, C., Vestaki, K., Dialynas, E., Sonenshine, D. E., Butler, R., Bruggner, R., Stinson, E., Collins, F. & Louis, C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect molecular biology, 17(1), 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x.Travillian, R., Malone, J., Pang, C., Hancock, J., Holland, P. W. H., Schofield, P. & Parkinson H. (2011). The vertebrate bridging ontology (VBO). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (Bio-Ontologies 2011); 2011 July 26–30; Buffalo,NewYork. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org).Trietsch, C, Mikó, I, Notton, D. & Deans, A. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e22676. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676.Vogt, L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12179.Vogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T. & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics,26(3), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x.Vogt, L. 2019. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6Wirkner, C., Göpel, T., Runge, J., Keiler, J., Klussmann-Fricke, B., Huckstorf, K., Scholz, S., Mikó, I., Yoder, M. & Richter, S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768. http://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw108.Yoder, M. J., Mikó, I., Seltmann, K. C., Bertone, M. A. & Deans, A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015991.Yu, L. 2014. A developer’s guide to the semantic Web. Springer Science & Business Media. 829p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43796-4.Antoniou G, Van Harmelen F. A. 2004. semantic web primer. MIT press. 288p.Balhoff J, Dahdul W, Kothari C, Lapp H, Lundberg J, Mabee P, Midford P, Westerfield, M., Vision, T. 2021. Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity. PLoS One, 5(5), e10500, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010500Balhoff J, Mikó I, Yoder M, Mullins P, Deans A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia. Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt028Bellinger PF, Christiansen KA, Janssens F. 1996– 2017. Checklist of the Collembola of the World. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (Accessed 27 April 2021), 2021.Burks K, Miko I, Deans A. Dendrocerus mexicali (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea, Megaspilidae): Novel antennal morphology, first description of female, and expansion of known range into the US. ZooKeys, (569), 53, 2016. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.569.6629Cui HO. 2008. Converting taxonomic descriptions to new digital formats. Biodiversity Informatics, 5(0). doi: 10.1.1.662.9637Cui HO. 2012. CharaParser for fine‐grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618Cui HO, Dahdul W, Dececchi A, Ibrahim N, Mabee P, Balhoff J, Gopalakrishnan H. 2015. CharaParser+ EQ: Performance evaluation without gold standard. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1):1-10, doi: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010020Cui, HO, Zhang L, Ford B, Cheng HL, Macklin JA, Reznicek A, Starr J. 2021. Measurement Recorder: developing a useful tool for making species descriptions that produces computable phenotypes. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baaa079Dahdul W, Dececchi TA, Ibrahim N, Lapp H, Mabee P. 2015. Moving the mountain: analysis of the effort required to transform comparative anatomy into computable anatomy. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/bav040Dallwitz M J. 1980. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon, 29(1), 41-46, doi: 10.2307/1219595De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M. Tbox and Abox reasoning in expressive description logics. 1996. In: Proceedings of KR-96, pages 316–327. M. Kaufmann, Los Altos.DuCharme B. 2013. Learning SPARQL: querying and updating with SPARQL 1.1. O'Reilly Media, Inc.Eliason C. M., Edwards S. V., Clarke J. A. 2019. Phenotools: An R package for visualizing and analysing phenomic datasets. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(9), 1393-1400, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13217.Frey J, Müller K, Hellmann S, Rahm E, & Vidal M. 2019. Evaluation of metadata representations in RDF stores. Semantic Web, 10(2), 205-229, doi: 10.3233/SW-180307.Girón, J. C., Mikó, I., Gonzalez-Montaña, L. A., Tarasov, S. & Matentzoglu, N. (2021, August 11). Ontology for the Anatomy of the Insect SkeletoMuscular system (AISM) v2021-08-11. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4660322Grumbling G, Strelets V. 2006. FlyBase: anatomical data, images, and queries. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(suppl. 1), D484-D488. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj068.Hong C. 2012. CharaParser for fine-grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(4):738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618.Mahner M. & Bunge M. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. 445p.Mikó I, Copeland R, Balhoff J, Yoder M, Deans A. 2014. Folding wings like a cockroach: a review of transverse wing folding ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae: Afrevania and Trissevania). PLoS One, 9(5), e94056,. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094056.Mikó I, Trietsch C, Sandall E, Yoder M, Hines H, Deans A. 2016. Malagasy Conostigmus (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) and the secret of scutes. PeerJ, 4, e2682. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2682.Mullins P, Kawada R, Balhoff J, Deans A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.223.3572Mungall C. 2007. Representing Phenotypes in OWL. Conference: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria, June 6-7Musen M., A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4), doi: 10.1145/2557001.25757003Leggio B, Laussu J, Carlier A, Godin C, Lemaire P, Faure E. 2019. MorphoNet: an interactive online morphological browser to explore complex multi-scale data. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-8, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10668-1O’Leary MA, Kaufman S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5), 529-537, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.xPaterson T, Kennedy JB, Pullan M, Cannon A, Armstrong K, Watson M, Raguenaud C, McDonald S, Russell G. 2004. A universal character model and ontology of defined terms for taxonomic description. In: International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (pp. 63-78). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24745-6_5.Sereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x.Ramírez M. J. & Michalik P. 2019. The spider anatomy ontology (SPD)—a versatile tool to link anatomy with cross-disciplinary data. Diversity, 11(10), 202, doi: 10.3390/d11100202.Silva T. & Feitosa, R. 2019. Using controlled vocabularies in anatomical terminology: A case study with Strumigenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arthropod structure & development, 52, 100877, doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2019.100877.Tarasov S. Integration of anatomy ontologies and evo-devo using structured Markov models suggests a new framework for modeling discrete phenotypic traits. Systematic Biology, 68(5), 698-716, 2020. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz005.Thessen A, Cui, H. & Mozzherin D. 2012. Applications of natural language processing in biodiversity science. Advances in Bioinformatics, 391574, doi: 10.1155/2012/391574.Topalis P, Tzavlaki C, Vestaki K, Dialynas E, Sonenshine D, Butler R, Bruggner R, Stinson E, Collins F, Louis C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect Molecular Biology, 17(1), 87-89, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x.Trietsch C, Mikó I, Notton D. G. & Deans A. R. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal, (6), doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676.Vogt L. 2019b. Morphological descriptions in times of eScience: instance-based versus class-based semantic representations of anatomy, 2019a. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28314.29124.Vogt L. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14, doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6.Vogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Köhler C, Meid, Quast B, Grobe P. 2019. SOCCOMAS: a FAIR web content management system that uses knowledge graphs and that is based on semantic programming. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baz067.Vogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Grobe P, Köhler C, Meid S. Semantic Morph D Base (Prototype). n.d.. Available: https://proto.morphdbase.de/.Vogt L, Bartolomaeus T. & Giribe G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3), 301-325, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x.Vogt L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters, and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539, doi: 10.1111/cla.12179Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes A, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo C, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Growth P, Goble C, Grethe J, Heringa J, Hoen P, Hooft R, Kuhn T. Kok R, Kok J, Lusher S, Martone M, Mons A, Packer A, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, Schaik R, Sansone S, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz M, Thompson M, van der Lei J, Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg A, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1), 1-9, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18Willmann R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. In: The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Eds. D. Williams, M. Schmitt, and Q. Wheeler. Published by Cambridge University Press.Wirkner C, Göpel T, Runge J, Keiler J, Klussmann-Fricke B, Huckstorf K, Scholz S, Mikó S, Yoder M. Richter S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw108Wood M, Lydon S, Tablan V. Maynard D, & Cunningham H. 2003. Using parallel texts to improve recall in IE. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP ’03), pp. 505–512, Borovetz, Bulgaria.Yoder M.J., Mikó I, Seltmann K.C., Bertone M. A. & Deans A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015991.Yoder M, Twidale M, Thomer A, Vogt L, Franz N, Guo J, Deans A. & Balhoff J. 2018. Taxonomy, and the production of semantic phenotypes. In: Application of Semantic Technology in Biodiversity Science Anne E. Thessen (Ed.). IOS Press /AKA Verlag, pp. 53–77.MincienciasEstudiantesInvestigadoresORIGINAL7172108.2022.pdf7172108.2022.pdfTesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Agrariasapplication/pdf8595571https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/3/7172108.2022.pdf2ced0c50789affecc5c112374df5c634MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84074https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/4/license.txt8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2MD54THUMBNAIL7172108.2022.pdf.jpg7172108.2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5984https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81441/5/7172108.2022.pdf.jpg47df6b48d6a3cdb29cd803534146dcccMD55unal/81441oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/814412023-08-04 23:04:19.32Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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

Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions

Publicaciones similares