Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia
ilustraciones, fotografías, gráficas, tablas
- Autores:
-
Díaz Valderrama, Miller Oswaldo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/80986
- Palabra clave:
- 300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropología
Ethnology
File of papers bearing on a case
Organizational sociology
Etnología
Expedientes
Sociología organizacional
Inscriptions
Bureaucracies
Touch
Affects
Ethnography
Constitutional Court of Colombia
The sacred
Lo sagrado
Inscripciones
etnografía
Corte Constitucional de Colombia
Burocracias
Tacto
Afectos
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_91154fb47109ba1434ec0a9876bd24b8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/80986 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
No escribirás: leer inscripciones, tocar expedientes y lo sagrado en la Corte Constitucional de Colombia |
| title |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| spellingShingle |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia 300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropología Ethnology File of papers bearing on a case Organizational sociology Etnología Expedientes Sociología organizacional Inscriptions Bureaucracies Touch Affects Ethnography Constitutional Court of Colombia The sacred Lo sagrado Inscripciones etnografía Corte Constitucional de Colombia Burocracias Tacto Afectos |
| title_short |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| title_full |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| title_fullStr |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| title_sort |
Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Díaz Valderrama, Miller Oswaldo |
| dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ashmore, Malcolm Thomas Restrepo Forero, Olga Matílde |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Díaz Valderrama, Miller Oswaldo |
| dc.contributor.illustrator.spa.fl_str_mv |
González, Dahiana (Pepita Ritu) |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicina |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropología |
| topic |
300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropología Ethnology File of papers bearing on a case Organizational sociology Etnología Expedientes Sociología organizacional Inscriptions Bureaucracies Touch Affects Ethnography Constitutional Court of Colombia The sacred Lo sagrado Inscripciones etnografía Corte Constitucional de Colombia Burocracias Tacto Afectos |
| dc.subject.lemb.eng.fl_str_mv |
Ethnology File of papers bearing on a case Organizational sociology |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Etnología Expedientes Sociología organizacional |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Inscriptions Bureaucracies Touch Affects Ethnography Constitutional Court of Colombia The sacred |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Lo sagrado Inscripciones etnografía Corte Constitucional de Colombia Burocracias Tacto Afectos |
| description |
ilustraciones, fotografías, gráficas, tablas |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-05 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-15T15:36:43Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-15T15:36:43Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80986 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80986 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abello Castiblanco, C. J. (2016). Forma y fondo: una etnografía de la materialidad de la justicia en Cali. Universitas Humanística, 335–363. Ashmore, M., & Restrepo Forero, O. (2013). El documento en su paso por la notaría: confianza, formalidad y credibilidad en Colombia. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 407–428. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke university Press. Barad, K. (2012). On touching—The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223. Barrera, L. (2008). Files circulation and the forms of legal experts: agency and personhood in the Argentine Supreme Court. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1(1), 3–24. Barrera, L. (2009). Performing the court: forms and practices of legal knowledge-making in Argentina. Cornell University. Barrera, L. (2011). Más allá de los fines del derecho: expedientes, burocracia y conocimiento legal. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (41), 57–72. Beira-Combariza, A. R. (2018). ¡Apague y vámonos! Análisis de una controversia entre expertos y legos en los estrados judiciales colombianos: riesgos de la energía eléctrica (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/64783/1/Apague y Vamonos.pdf Berg, M., & Bowker, G. (1997). The Multiple Bodies of the Medical Record: Toward a Sociology of an Artifact. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(3), 513–537. Berger, P. L. (1970). A rumor of angels: Modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. Anchor. Berger, P. L. (2011). The sacred canopy. Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Open Road Media. Biehl, J. (2014). Ethnography in the Way of Theory. In The Ground Between (pp. 94–118). Duke University Press. Blake, R. J. C. (2011). Ethnographies of touch and touching ethnographies: some prospects for touch in anthropological enquiries. Anthropology Matters, 13(1). Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press. Buchely, L. (2018). The Affective State and Precarious Citizenship: Conflict, Historical Memory, and Forgiveness in Bojayá, Colombia. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 10(1), 7–34. Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay BT. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A new Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge and Kegan Paul. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303). Castillo, C. C. (2017). The Bill factory : how documents , numbers , and boundaries work to produce law in the Congress of Colombia (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/59332/ Classen, C. (2012). The Deepest Sense: A cultural history of touch. Urbana, Chicago, and Springfield: university of illinois press. Classen, C. (2020). Fingerprints. Writing about touch. In C. Classen (Ed.), The Book of Touch (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge. Coopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M. E., & Woolgar, S. (2014). Representation in scientific practice revisited. MIT Press. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2019). ABECÉ de la Acción de Tutela. Serie Documento No. 32 (p. 20). p. 20. Deane-Drummond, C., Bergmann, S., & Szerszynski, B. (2015). Technofutures, Nature and the Sacred: Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Demerath III, N. J. (2000). The Varieties of Sacred Experience: Finding the Sacred in a Secular Grove. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00001 Douglas, M. (2001). Purity and Danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803856700100211 Durkheim, E. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press. Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane. The nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. Francis, M., & Knott, K. (2011). Return? It never left. Exploring the “sacred” as a resource for bridging the gap between the religious and the secular. In C. Kutz, H. Riss, & O. Roy (Eds.), Religious Norms in the Public Sphere (pp. 44–48). Berkley: European University Institute. Harrison, P. (2016). Angels on pinheads and needles’ points. Notes and Queries, 63(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjv232 Herzfeld, M. (1993). The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Rootes of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press. Hull, M. S. (2003). The file: Agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00019-3 Hull, M. S. (2012a). Documents and Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267. Hull, M. S. (2012b). Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkley, Los Ángeles, London: University of California Press. Jaramillo, I. C., & Buchely, L. F. (2019). La etnografía burocrática como herramienta crítica en el derecho administrativo. In I. Jaramillo & L. Buchely (Eds.), Etnografías Burocráticas- Una nueva mirada a la construcción del estado en Colombia (|, pp. 9–33). https://doi.org/10.15425/2017.210 Jasanoff, S. (2004a). Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge. Jasanoff, S. (2004b). The idiom of co-production. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, 1–12. Kameo, N., & Whalen, J. (2015). Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action. Qualitative Sociology, 38(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7 Knott, K. (2013). The Secular Sacred: In between or both/and? In C. Day, Abby; Vincett, Giselle; Cotter (Ed.), Social identities Between the Sacred and the Secular (pp. 145–160). Ashgate Publishing Limited. Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1\_suppl), 264–280. Latour, B. (1990a). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 103–131. Latour, B. (1990b). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Representation in Scientific Practice Ed Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 6(1962), 1–32. Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25. Latour, B. (2000). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. London: Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (2001). ‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations of Religious Speech. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 39(1), 215–234. Latour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press. Latour, B. (2005b). ‘Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,’or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience (pp. 27–48). New York: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (2010a). On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Latour, B. (2010b). The Making of the Law: an Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press. Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press. Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. Harvard University Press. Latour, B. (2014). Rejoicing: Or the torments of religious speech. John Wiley & Sons. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Latta, A. (2014). Matter, politics and the sacred: insurgent ecologies of citizenship. Cultural Geographies, 21(3), 323– 341. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. In After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 3, 141–158. Lewandowski, A. (2014). O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal (Universidade de Brasilia). Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/18359 Lewandowski, A. (2016). O direito através dos processos: notas sobre as práticas jurídicas no Supremo Tribunal Federal. Anuário Antropológico, 41(2), 157–178. Londoño Botero, R. (2011). Juan De la Cruz Varela. Sociedad y política en la región de Sumapaz (1902-1984). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford University Press. Lynch, G., & Sheldon, R. (2013). The sociology of the sacred: A conversation with Jeffrey Alexander. Culture and Religion, 14(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2012.758163 Lynch, M. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18(2), 265–289. Marx, K. (1906). Capital: a critique of political economy. New York: Random House, INC. Matory, J. L. (2018). The Fetish Revisited: Marx, Freud, and the Gods Black People Make. Durham and London: Duke University Press Mauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West LTD. Mol, A. (2003). The body multiple. Duke University Press. Mora-Gámez, F. (2016). Reconocimiento de víctimas del conflicto armado en Colombia: sobre tecnologías de representación y configuraciones de Estado. Universitas Humanística, (82). Myers, N. (2015). Rendering life molecular: Models, modelers, and excitable matter. Duke University Press. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2007). Make-believe papers, legal forms and the counterfeit. Anthropological Theory, 7(1), 79–98. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe Space. Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2004). The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Olarte-sierra, M. F. (2019). Of flesh and bone: emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed con flict. Tapuya : Latin American Science , Technology and Society, 2(1), 77–93. Ordoñez-Castillo, D. J. (2018). Del testigo virtual al testigo emocional: lugares, tecnologías y afectos en el Museo Casa de la Memoria de Medellín. Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/70725/ Otto, R. (1936). The idea of the holly. London: Oxford University Press. Passoth, J.-H., & Rowland, N. J. (2010). Actor-network state: Integrating actor-network theory and state theory. International Sociology, 25(6), 818–841. Paterson, M. (2007). The Senses of Touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Berg. Pellegrino, V. (2017). Incumplir cumpliendo: una etnografía al papeleo del Auto 004. Universidad de los Andes Pellegrino, V. (2021). Cifras de papel: la rendición de cuentas del Gobierno colombiano ante la justicia como una manera de incumplir cumpliendo. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, (42), 3–27. Pels, P. (2012). The Modern Fear of Matter: Reflections on the Protestantism of Victorian Science. In B. Meyer & D. Houtman (Eds.), Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality (pp. 27–39). New York: Fordham University Press. Pottage, A. (2012). The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 167–183. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage. Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press. Puig De La Bellacasa, M. (2009). Touching technologies, touching visions. The reclaiming of sensorial experience and the politics of speculative thinking. Subjectivity, 28(1), 297–315. Ranquetat Júnior, C. A. (2012). Laicidade à brasileira: um estudo sobre a controvérsia em torno da presença de símbolos religiosos em espaços públicos. UFGRS. Restrepo Forero, O., & Ashmore, M. (2021). The guerrilla’s ID card: Flatland against Fatland in Colombia. In S. Woolgar, E. Vogel, D. Moats, & C.-F. Helgesson (Eds.), The Imposter As Social Theory: thinking with gatecrashers, cheats and charlatans. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Restrepo Forero, O., & Gómez Morales, Y. J. (2016). El árbol celular y la pregunta por cómo se ensamblan ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 39(2), 13–27. Restrepo Forero, O., Guerra, S., & Ashmore, M. (2013). La ciudadanía de papel: ensamblando la cédula y el estado. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 277–327. Righetti, N. (2014). The sacred in current social sciences research. Italian Sociological Review, 4(1), 133–163. Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 413–429. Serje, M. (2012). El mito de la ausencia del Estado: la incorporación económica de las “zonas de frontera” en Colombia. Cahiers Des Amériques Latines, (71), 95–117. Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(4), 481–520. Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2007). Introduction. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The Anthropology of the state: a reader (pp. 1–42). India: Blackwell Publishing. Smith, D. E. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257–268. Star, S. L. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 26–56. Star, S. L. (1995). The Politics of Formal Representations: Wizards, Gurús and Organizational Complexities. In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (pp. 88–118). Albany: State University of New York Press. Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. Star, S. L. (2002). Got infrastructure? How standards, categories, and other aspects of infrastructure influence communication. 2nd Social Study of IT Workshop at the LSE ICT and Globalization. Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1), 9–30. Stausberg, M. (2017). The sacred and the holy – from around 1917 to today. Religion, 47(4), 549–556. Stengers, I. (2010). Including nonhumans in political theory: opening the Pandora’s box? In I. Braun, B; Whatmore, SJ; Stengers (Ed.), Political matter (pp. 3–33). University of Minnesota Press. Szerszynski, B. (2005). Nature, Technology and the Sacred. London: Blackwell. Taussig, M. (1992). The Nervous System. New York and London: Routledge. Van Oorschot, I., & Schinkel, W. (2015). The Legal Case File as Border Object: On Self-reference and Other-reference in Criminal Law. Journal of Law and Society, 42(4), 499–527. Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology, trans. Stanford University Press. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1; G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Weber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Beacon Press. Weber, M. (2004). Max Weber. The Vocation Lecturers (T. B. Owen, David; Strong, Ed.). Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge. Wissink, L., & van Oorschot, I. (2020). Affective bureaucratic relations: File practices in a European deportation unit and criminal court. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. Woolgar, S. (1981). Discovery: logic and sequence in a scientific text (1). In The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 239–268). Springer. |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
xi, 156 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.country.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia |
| dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociología |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/1/1013639613.2021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/2/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/3/1013639613.2021.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a2d27e5101f84e3dcf1529c86b667512 8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2 53201a54f0adb51e18bf196c3943ae83 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814090019916218368 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Ashmore, Malcolm Thomas86861fec4dcf95c79007b329d30e5b89Restrepo Forero, Olga Matílde5ca10aeb3d15bf8d57ffb9341b541025600Díaz Valderrama, Miller Oswaldo59765c4758397a4d43d5b6fecddf5c36González, Dahiana (Pepita Ritu)Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicina2022-02-15T15:36:43Z2022-02-15T15:36:43Z2021-12-05https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80986Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, fotografías, gráficas, tablasThis thesis deals with the presence of a sacred object in a modern institution. For this, I take a naturally-occurring metaphor seriously, during my ethnographic passage through this institution between August and December of 2019. According to this metaphor, a file is sacred because it is a public document. I ask how a technology of legal knowledge -an inscription- such as the file becomes a sacred object in the hands of its holders. For this, I focus on the practices of touching tutela files in their reviewing. I analyse how the sacred speaks of two different ways of touching and relating with the file: as a working document and as the history of a case. One in which writing and touch are part of the business-as-usual of the Court, and the other in which writing and the touch on files are restricted and forbidden in their circulation. I focus on the transformation of one version of the file into another, in which the Court and the file become a macro actor (a Wholly-other entity), while other actors are absent from their representational practices. Thus, I show how the file organizes the Court and how, in the same movement, it becomes touchy and touching: something delicate that must be protected, being endowed with the risky capacity to record everything in its path. In this, the file is also granted the capacity to touch, producing an emotional witnessing of the Court.Esta tesis se ocupa de un objeto sagrado en una institución moderna. Para esto, tomo en serio una metáfora naturalmente ocurrida durante mi paso etnográfico por la Corte Constitucional entre agosto y diciembre de 2019, según la cual un expediente es sagrado al ser un documento público. Me pregunto cómo una tecnología de conocimiento jurídico -una inscripción- como el expediente se convierte en un objeto sagrado en manos de quienes lo manejan y, para ello, me centro en las prácticas de tocar los expedientes de tutela en su revisión. Analizo cómo lo sagrado habla de dos formas diferentes de tocar y relacionarse con esta tecnología: como documento de trabajo y como historia de un caso. En una de estas, la escritura y el tacto de expedientes forman parte del funcionamiento habitual de la Corte y, en la otra, la escritura y el tacto del expediente están restringidos y prohibidos en su circulación. Me centro en la transformación de una versión del expediente en otra, donde la Corte y el expediente se convierten en un macro actor (uno totalmente-otro), mientras que otros actores son invisibilizados en sus prácticas de representación. Así, muestro cómo el expediente organiza la Corte y cómo, en el mismo movimiento, éste se vuelve sensible y envolvente: algo delicado que debe ser protegido, siendo dotado con la riesgosa capacidad de registrar todo a su paso. En esto, al expediente también le es concedida la capacidad de tocar, produciendo un testimonio emocional de la Corte. (Texto tomado de la fuente).Incluye anexosMaestríaMagíster en Estudios Sociales de La Cienciaxi, 156 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la CienciaDepartamento de SociologíaFacultad de Ciencias HumanasBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropologíaEthnologyFile of papers bearing on a caseOrganizational sociologyEtnologíaExpedientesSociología organizacionalInscriptionsBureaucraciesTouchAffectsEthnographyConstitutional Court of ColombiaThe sacredLo sagradoInscripcionesetnografíaCorte Constitucional de ColombiaBurocraciasTactoAfectosThou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of ColombiaNo escribirás: leer inscripciones, tocar expedientes y lo sagrado en la Corte Constitucional de ColombiaTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMColombiaAbello Castiblanco, C. J. (2016). Forma y fondo: una etnografía de la materialidad de la justicia en Cali. Universitas Humanística, 335–363.Ashmore, M., & Restrepo Forero, O. (2013). El documento en su paso por la notaría: confianza, formalidad y credibilidad en Colombia. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 407–428.Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke university Press.Barad, K. (2012). On touching—The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223.Barrera, L. (2008). Files circulation and the forms of legal experts: agency and personhood in the Argentine Supreme Court. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1(1), 3–24.Barrera, L. (2009). Performing the court: forms and practices of legal knowledge-making in Argentina. Cornell University.Barrera, L. (2011). Más allá de los fines del derecho: expedientes, burocracia y conocimiento legal. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (41), 57–72.Beira-Combariza, A. R. (2018). ¡Apague y vámonos! Análisis de una controversia entre expertos y legos en los estrados judiciales colombianos: riesgos de la energía eléctrica (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/64783/1/Apague y Vamonos.pdfBerg, M., & Bowker, G. (1997). The Multiple Bodies of the Medical Record: Toward a Sociology of an Artifact. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(3), 513–537.Berger, P. L. (1970). A rumor of angels: Modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. Anchor.Berger, P. L. (2011). The sacred canopy. Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Open Road Media.Biehl, J. (2014). Ethnography in the Way of Theory. In The Ground Between (pp. 94–118). Duke University Press.Blake, R. J. C. (2011). Ethnographies of touch and touching ethnographies: some prospects for touch in anthropological enquiries. Anthropology Matters, 13(1).Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.Buchely, L. (2018). The Affective State and Precarious Citizenship: Conflict, Historical Memory, and Forgiveness in Bojayá, Colombia. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 10(1), 7–34.Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay BT. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A new Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge and Kegan Paul.Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303).Castillo, C. C. (2017). The Bill factory : how documents , numbers , and boundaries work to produce law in the Congress of Colombia (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/59332/Classen, C. (2012). The Deepest Sense: A cultural history of touch. Urbana, Chicago, and Springfield: university of illinois press.Classen, C. (2020). Fingerprints. Writing about touch. In C. Classen (Ed.), The Book of Touch (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.Coopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M. E., & Woolgar, S. (2014). Representation in scientific practice revisited. MIT Press.Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2019). ABECÉ de la Acción de Tutela. Serie Documento No. 32 (p. 20). p. 20.Deane-Drummond, C., Bergmann, S., & Szerszynski, B. (2015). Technofutures, Nature and the Sacred: Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Demerath III, N. J. (2000). The Varieties of Sacred Experience: Finding the Sacred in a Secular Grove. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00001Douglas, M. (2001). Purity and Danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803856700100211Durkheim, E. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane. The nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Francis, M., & Knott, K. (2011). Return? It never left. Exploring the “sacred” as a resource for bridging the gap between the religious and the secular. In C. Kutz, H. Riss, & O. Roy (Eds.), Religious Norms in the Public Sphere (pp. 44–48). Berkley: European University Institute.Harrison, P. (2016). Angels on pinheads and needles’ points. Notes and Queries, 63(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjv232Herzfeld, M. (1993). The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Rootes of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.Hull, M. S. (2003). The file: Agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00019-3Hull, M. S. (2012a). Documents and Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267.Hull, M. S. (2012b). Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkley, Los Ángeles, London: University of California Press.Jaramillo, I. C., & Buchely, L. F. (2019). La etnografía burocrática como herramienta crítica en el derecho administrativo. In I. Jaramillo & L. Buchely (Eds.), Etnografías Burocráticas- Una nueva mirada a la construcción del estado en Colombia (|, pp. 9–33). https://doi.org/10.15425/2017.210Jasanoff, S. (2004a). Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.Jasanoff, S. (2004b). The idiom of co-production. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, 1–12.Kameo, N., & Whalen, J. (2015). Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action. Qualitative Sociology, 38(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7Knott, K. (2013). The Secular Sacred: In between or both/and? In C. Day, Abby; Vincett, Giselle; Cotter (Ed.), Social identities Between the Sacred and the Secular (pp. 145–160). Ashgate Publishing Limited.Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1\_suppl), 264–280.Latour, B. (1990a). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 103–131.Latour, B. (1990b). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Representation in Scientific Practice Ed Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 6(1962), 1–32.Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.Latour, B. (2000). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. London: Harvard University Press.Latour, B. (2001). ‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations of Religious Speech. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 39(1), 215–234.Latour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.Latour, B. (2005b). ‘Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,’or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience (pp. 27–48). New York: Oxford University Press.Latour, B. (2010a). On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Latour, B. (2010b). The Making of the Law: an Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press.Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press.Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. Harvard University Press.Latour, B. (2014). Rejoicing: Or the torments of religious speech. John Wiley & Sons.Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Latta, A. (2014). Matter, politics and the sacred: insurgent ecologies of citizenship. Cultural Geographies, 21(3), 323– 341.Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. In After Method: Mess in Social Science Research.Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 3, 141–158.Lewandowski, A. (2014). O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal (Universidade de Brasilia). Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/18359Lewandowski, A. (2016). O direito através dos processos: notas sobre as práticas jurídicas no Supremo Tribunal Federal. Anuário Antropológico, 41(2), 157–178.Londoño Botero, R. (2011). Juan De la Cruz Varela. Sociedad y política en la región de Sumapaz (1902-1984). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford University Press.Lynch, G., & Sheldon, R. (2013). The sociology of the sacred: A conversation with Jeffrey Alexander. Culture and Religion, 14(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2012.758163Lynch, M. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18(2), 265–289.Marx, K. (1906). Capital: a critique of political economy. New York: Random House, INC.Matory, J. L. (2018). The Fetish Revisited: Marx, Freud, and the Gods Black People Make. Durham and London: Duke University PressMauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West LTD.Mol, A. (2003). The body multiple. Duke University Press.Mora-Gámez, F. (2016). Reconocimiento de víctimas del conflicto armado en Colombia: sobre tecnologías de representación y configuraciones de Estado. Universitas Humanística, (82).Myers, N. (2015). Rendering life molecular: Models, modelers, and excitable matter. Duke University Press.Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2007). Make-believe papers, legal forms and the counterfeit. Anthropological Theory, 7(1), 79–98.Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe Space. Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2004). The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Olarte-sierra, M. F. (2019). Of flesh and bone: emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed con flict. Tapuya : Latin American Science , Technology and Society, 2(1), 77–93.Ordoñez-Castillo, D. J. (2018). Del testigo virtual al testigo emocional: lugares, tecnologías y afectos en el Museo Casa de la Memoria de Medellín. Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/70725/Otto, R. (1936). The idea of the holly. London: Oxford University Press.Passoth, J.-H., & Rowland, N. J. (2010). Actor-network state: Integrating actor-network theory and state theory. International Sociology, 25(6), 818–841.Paterson, M. (2007). The Senses of Touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Berg.Pellegrino, V. (2017). Incumplir cumpliendo: una etnografía al papeleo del Auto 004. Universidad de los AndesPellegrino, V. (2021). Cifras de papel: la rendición de cuentas del Gobierno colombiano ante la justicia como una manera de incumplir cumpliendo. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, (42), 3–27.Pels, P. (2012). The Modern Fear of Matter: Reflections on the Protestantism of Victorian Science. In B. Meyer & D. Houtman (Eds.), Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality (pp. 27–39). New York: Fordham University Press.Pottage, A. (2012). The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 167–183.Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836.Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.Puig De La Bellacasa, M. (2009). Touching technologies, touching visions. The reclaiming of sensorial experience and the politics of speculative thinking. Subjectivity, 28(1), 297–315.Ranquetat Júnior, C. A. (2012). Laicidade à brasileira: um estudo sobre a controvérsia em torno da presença de símbolos religiosos em espaços públicos. UFGRS.Restrepo Forero, O., & Ashmore, M. (2021). The guerrilla’s ID card: Flatland against Fatland in Colombia. In S. Woolgar, E. Vogel, D. Moats, & C.-F. Helgesson (Eds.), The Imposter As Social Theory: thinking with gatecrashers, cheats and charlatans. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Restrepo Forero, O., & Gómez Morales, Y. J. (2016). El árbol celular y la pregunta por cómo se ensamblan ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 39(2), 13–27.Restrepo Forero, O., Guerra, S., & Ashmore, M. (2013). La ciudadanía de papel: ensamblando la cédula y el estado. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 277–327.Righetti, N. (2014). The sacred in current social sciences research. Italian Sociological Review, 4(1), 133–163.Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 413–429.Serje, M. (2012). El mito de la ausencia del Estado: la incorporación económica de las “zonas de frontera” en Colombia. Cahiers Des Amériques Latines, (71), 95–117.Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(4), 481–520.Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2007). Introduction. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The Anthropology of the state: a reader (pp. 1–42). India: Blackwell Publishing.Smith, D. E. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257–268.Star, S. L. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 26–56.Star, S. L. (1995). The Politics of Formal Representations: Wizards, Gurús and Organizational Complexities. In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (pp. 88–118). Albany: State University of New York Press.Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.Star, S. L. (2002). Got infrastructure? How standards, categories, and other aspects of infrastructure influence communication. 2nd Social Study of IT Workshop at the LSE ICT and Globalization.Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1), 9–30.Stausberg, M. (2017). The sacred and the holy – from around 1917 to today. Religion, 47(4), 549–556.Stengers, I. (2010). Including nonhumans in political theory: opening the Pandora’s box? In I. Braun, B; Whatmore, SJ; Stengers (Ed.), Political matter (pp. 3–33). University of Minnesota Press.Szerszynski, B. (2005). Nature, Technology and the Sacred. London: Blackwell.Taussig, M. (1992). The Nervous System. New York and London: Routledge.Van Oorschot, I., & Schinkel, W. (2015). The Legal Case File as Border Object: On Self-reference and Other-reference in Criminal Law. Journal of Law and Society, 42(4), 499–527.Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology, trans. Stanford University Press.Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1; G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Weber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Beacon Press.Weber, M. (2004). Max Weber. The Vocation Lecturers (T. B. Owen, David; Strong, Ed.).Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge.Wissink, L., & van Oorschot, I. (2020). Affective bureaucratic relations: File practices in a European deportation unit and criminal court. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.Woolgar, S. (1981). Discovery: logic and sequence in a scientific text (1). In The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 239–268). Springer.EstudiantesInvestigadoresPúblico generalORIGINAL1013639613.2021.pdf1013639613.2021.pdfTesis de Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Cienciaapplication/pdf2700699https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/1/1013639613.2021.pdfa2d27e5101f84e3dcf1529c86b667512MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84074https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/2/license.txt8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2MD52THUMBNAIL1013639613.2021.pdf.jpg1013639613.2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5231https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80986/3/1013639613.2021.pdf.jpg53201a54f0adb51e18bf196c3943ae83MD53unal/80986oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/809862024-08-03 23:10:07.902Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |