Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración
Ilustraciones, tablas
- Autores:
-
Cepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/85339
- Palabra clave:
- 630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas
Fisiología Vegetal
Plant physiology
Adaptación fisiológica
Physiological adaptation
Sucrosa
Sucrose
Caña de azúcar
Sugar cane
Sombra
Fotosíntesis C4
Fluorescencia de la clorofila
Transitorio OJIP
Transporte de electrones
Rendimiento cuántico
Sacarosa
Shade
C4 photosynthesis
OJIP transients
Chlorophyll fluorescence
Electron transport
Quantum yield
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_8e039fe8bdfe56f810f2e3e9269c897b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/85339 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Physiology of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) in response to low radiation during the ripening stage |
| title |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| spellingShingle |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración 630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas Fisiología Vegetal Plant physiology Adaptación fisiológica Physiological adaptation Sucrosa Sucrose Caña de azúcar Sugar cane Sombra Fotosíntesis C4 Fluorescencia de la clorofila Transitorio OJIP Transporte de electrones Rendimiento cuántico Sacarosa Shade C4 photosynthesis OJIP transients Chlorophyll fluorescence Electron transport Quantum yield |
| title_short |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| title_full |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| title_fullStr |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| title_sort |
Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Cepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Quevedo Amaya, Yeison Mauricio Mejía de Tafur, María Sara |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Cepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes |
| dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes [0000-0003-2332-4158] |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas |
| topic |
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas Fisiología Vegetal Plant physiology Adaptación fisiológica Physiological adaptation Sucrosa Sucrose Caña de azúcar Sugar cane Sombra Fotosíntesis C4 Fluorescencia de la clorofila Transitorio OJIP Transporte de electrones Rendimiento cuántico Sacarosa Shade C4 photosynthesis OJIP transients Chlorophyll fluorescence Electron transport Quantum yield |
| dc.subject.agrovoc.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisiología Vegetal Plant physiology Adaptación fisiológica Physiological adaptation Sucrosa Sucrose Caña de azúcar Sugar cane |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sombra Fotosíntesis C4 Fluorescencia de la clorofila Transitorio OJIP Transporte de electrones Rendimiento cuántico Sacarosa |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Shade C4 photosynthesis OJIP transients Chlorophyll fluorescence Electron transport Quantum yield |
| description |
Ilustraciones, tablas |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-16T21:33:27Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-16T21:33:27Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85339 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85339 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Arce Cubas, L., Vath, R. L., Bernardo, E. L., Sales, C. R. G., Burnett, A. C., & Kromdijk, J. (2023). Activation of CO2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C4 than in C3 photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 5323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115 Abreu, P. P., Souza, M. M., de Almeida, A. A. F., Santos, E. A., Freitas, J. C. de O., & Figueiredo, A. L. (2014). Photosynthetic responses of ornamental passion flower hybrids to varying light intensities. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36(8), 1993–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11738-014-1574-0/FIGURES/4 Akhkha, A. (2010). Modelling photosynthetic light-response curve in Calotropis procera under salinity or water deficit stress using non-linear models. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 3(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1658-3655(12)60020-X Almeida, R. L., Silveira, N. M., Miranda, M. T., Pacheco, V. S., Cruz, L. P., Xavier, M. A., Machado, E. C., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2022). Evidence of photosynthetic acclimation to self-shading in sugarcane canopies. Photosynthetica, 60(4), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2022.045 Almeida, R. L., Silveira, N. M., Pacheco, V. S., Xavier, M. A., Ribeiro, R. V., & Machado, E. C. (2021). Variability and heritability of photosynthetic traits in Saccharum complex. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 33(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00217-x Arce Cubas, L., Vath, R. L., Bernardo, E. L., Sales, C. R. G., Burnett, A. C., & Kromdijk, J. (2023). Activation of CO2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C4 than in C3 photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 5323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115 Asocaña. (2022). Un dulce sabor que se trasforma. Informe anual 2021 – 2022. Sector Agroindustrial de la Caña. http://www.asocana.org/documentos/672022-B663EF18-00FF00,000A000,878787,C3C3C3,0F0F0F,B4B4B4,FF00FF,FFFFFF,2D2D2D,A3C4B5.pdf Ávila-Zárraga, J. G. (2009). Síntesis fotoquímica mediante luz solar. Educación Química, 20(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30046-6 Azcón-Bieto, J., & Talón, M. (2003). Fundamentos de fisiología vegetal. In McGrawHill. Bąba, W., Kompała-Bąba, A., Zabochnicka-świątek, M., Luźniak, J., Hanczaruk, R., Adamski, A., & Kalaji, H. M. (2019). Discovering trends in photosynthesis using modern analytical tools: More than 100 reasons to use chlorophyll fluorescence. In Photosynthetica (Vol. 57, Issue 2, pp. 668–679). https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.069 Baker, N. R. (2008). Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 Baker, N. R., Harbinson, J., & Kramer, D. M. (2007). Determining the limitations and regulation of photosynthetic energy transduction in leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30(9), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01680.x Bakker, H. (1999). The Morphology of the Sugar Cane Plant. In Sugar Cane Cultivation and Management (pp. 3–8). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4725-9_2 Ballaré, C. L. (2014). Light Regulation of Plant Defense. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65(1), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040145 Banks, J. M. (2017). Continuous excitation chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: a review for practitioners. Tree Physiology, 37(8), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx059 Beed, F. D., Paveley, N. D., & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2007). Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 145(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859606006678 Bhat, J. Y., Thieulin-Pardo, G., Hartl, F. U., & Hayer-Hartl, M. (2017). Rubisco Activases: AAA+ Chaperones Adapted to Enzyme Repair. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 4(APR), 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00020 Boyd, R. A., Gandin, A., & Cousins, A. B. (2015). Temperature response of C4 photosynthesis: Biochemical analysis of Rubisco, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and Carbonic Anhydrase in Setaria viridis. Plant Physiology, 169(3), pp.00586.2015. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00586 Calvache Ulloa, M., & Valle, L. (2021). Índice de cosecha con macro-nutrientes en grano de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Revista Alfa, 5(13), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v5i13.95 Cardozo, N. P., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2013). Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Scientia Agricola, 70(6), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000600011 Castillo, R. O., & Silva Cifuentes, E. (2022). Sugarcane Breeding and Supporting Genetics Research in Ecuador. Sugar Tech, 24(1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01057-4 Castro, O. R. (2010). La variabilidad de la radiación solar en la superficie terrestre y sus efectos en la producción de caña de azúcar en Guatemala. https://cengicana.org/files/20150828053605989.pdf CENICAÑA. (2021). Informe Anual 2021. Centro de Investigación de La Caña de Azúcar de Colombia, 138. https://www.cenicana.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ia2021_Abril13_2022.pdf Chen, James. C. P. (1991). Manual del Azucar de Caña. Collison, R. F., Raven, E. C., Pignon, C. P., & Long, S. P. (2020). Light, Not Age, Underlies the Maladaptation of Maize and Miscanthus Photosynthesis to Self-Shading. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00783 Dai, Y., Shen, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, L., Hannaway, D., & Lu, H. (2009). Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65(2–3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008 De Matos, M., Santos, F., & Eichler, P. (2020). Sugarcane world scenario. In Sugarcane Biorefinery, Technology and Perspectives (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814236-3.00001-9 De Souza, A. P., Wang, Y., Orr, D. J., Carmo‐Silva, E., & Long, S. P. (2020). Photosynthesis across African cassava germplasm is limited by Rubisco and mesophyll conductance at steady state, but by stomatal conductance in fluctuating light. New Phytologist, 225(6), 2498–2512. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16142 Demarsy, E., Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., & Ulm, R. (2018). Coping with ‘Dark Sides of the Sun’ through Photoreceptor Signaling. Trends in Plant Science, 23(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.11.007 Denton, A. K., Simon, R., & Weber, A. P. M. (2013). C4 photosynthesis: from evolutionary analyses to strategies for synthetic reconstruction of the trait. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 16(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.013 Díaz-Torres, J. J., Hernández-Mena, L., Murillo-Tovar, M. A., León-Becerril, E., López-López, A., Suárez-Plascencia, C., Aviña-Rodriguez, E., Barradas-Gimate, A., & Ojeda-Castillo, V. (2017). Assessment of the modulation effect of rainfall on solar radiation availability at the Earth’s surface. Meteorological Applications, 24(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1616 Dinesh Babu, K. S., Janakiraman, V., Palaniswamy, H., Kasirajan, L., Gomathi, R., & Ramkumar, T. R. (2022). A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 69(8), 2623–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01430-6 Durand, M., Murchie, E. H., Lindfors, A. V., Urban, O., Aphalo, P. J., & Robson, T. M. (2021). Diffuse solar radiation and canopy photosynthesis in a changing environment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 311, 108684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108684 Ermakova, M., Bellasio, C., Fitzpatrick, D., Furbank, R. T., Mamedov, F., & von Caemmerer, S. (2021). Upregulation of bundle sheath electron transport capacity under limiting light in C 4 Setaria viridis. The Plant Journal, 106(5), 1443–1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15247 Fang, S., Lang, T., Cai, M., & Han, T. (2022). Light keys open locks of plant photoresponses: A review of phosphors for plant cultivation LEDs. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 902, 163825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163825 Fankhauser, C., & Chory, J. (1997). Light control of plant development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 13(1), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.203 FAO. (2020). Sugarcane | Land & Water | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Land & Water | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information/sugarcane/en/ FAO. (2022). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2022. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2211en FAOSTAT. (2021). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize Fiorucci, A.-S., & Fankhauser, C. (2017). Plant Strategies for Enhancing Access to Sunlight. Current Biology, 27(17), R931–R940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.085 Flack‐Prain, S., Shi, L., Zhu, P., Rocha, H. R., Cabral, O., Hu, S., & Williams, M. (2021). The impact of climate change and climate extremes on sugarcane production. GCB Bioenergy, 13(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12797 Franić, M., Jambrović, A., Zdunić, Z., Šimić, D., & Galić, V. (2020). Photosynthetic properties of maize hybrids under different environmental conditions probed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence. Maydica, 64(3). Gao, P., Wang, P., Du, B., Li, P., & Kang, B.-H. (2022). Accelerated remodeling of the mesophyll-bundle sheath interface in the maize C4 cycle mutant leaves. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5057. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09135-7 Givnish, T. (1988). Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective. Functional Plant Biology, 15(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880063 Goltsev, V. N., Kalaji, H. M., Paunov, M., Bąba, W., Horaczek, T., Mojski, J., Kociel, H., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2016). Variable chlorophyll fluorescence and its use for assessing physiological condition of plant photosynthetic apparatus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 63(6), 869–893. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443716050058 Gong, X., Liu, C., Dang, K., Wang, H., Du, W., Qi, H., Jiang, Y., & Feng, B. (2022). Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Source Leaf Adaptation to Shading Stress Affects Not Only Photosynthetic Physiology Metabolism but Also Control of Key Gene Expression. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.753264 Gregoriou, K., Pontikis, K., & Vemmos, S. (2007). Effects of reduced irradiance on leaf morphology, photosynthetic capacity, and fruit yield in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica, 45(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0029-x He, Q., & Li, D. (2021). Assessing shade stress in leaves of turf-type tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Photosynthetica, 59(4), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2021.037 Herrmann, H. A., Schwartz, J.-M., & Johnson, G. N. (2020). From empirical to theoretical models of light response curves - linking photosynthetic and metabolic acclimation. Photosynthesis Research, 145(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-019-00681-2 Hitchcock, A., Hunter, C. N., Sobotka, R., Komenda, J., Dann, M., & Leister, D. (2022). Redesigning the photosynthetic light reactions to enhance photosynthesis – the PhotoRedesign consortium. The Plant Journal, 109(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15552 Huang, D., Wu, L., Chen, J. R., & Dong, L. (2011). Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels. Photosynthetica, 49(4), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-011-0076-1 Humbert, R. P., & Bonnet, J. A. (1963). The Growing of Sugar Cane. Soil Science, 107(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196903000-00021 Hussain, S., Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ali, S., & Khan, I. (2019). Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Aspects of Seed Priming. In Priming and Pretreatment of Seeds and Seedlings (pp. 43–62). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8625-1_3 IDEAM. (2022). BOLETÍN DE MONITOREO FENOMENO EL NIÑO Y LA NIÑA - IDEAM. http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/tiempo-y-clima/boletin-de-seguimiento-fenomeno-el-nino-y-la-nina/-/document_library_display/I6NwA8DioHgN/view/121539941?_110_INSTANCE_I6NwA8DioHgN_redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ideam.gov.co%2Fweb%2Ftiempo-y-clima%2Fboletin-de-segui Jaiswal, R., Mall, R. K., Patel, S., Singh, N., Mendiratta, N., & Gupta, A. (2023). Indian sugarcane under warming climate: A simulation study. European Journal of Agronomy, 144, 126760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126760 James, N. I. (1980). Sugarcane. In Hybridization of Crop Plants (pp. 617–629). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2135/1980.hybridizationofcrops.c44 Kabir, M. Y., Nambeesan, S. U., & Díaz-Pérez, J. C. (2023). Carbon dioxide and light curves and leaf gas exchange responses to shade levels in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Science, 326, 111532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111532 Kaiser, E., Morales, A., Harbinson, J., Kromdijk, J., Heuvelink, E., & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2015). Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(9), 2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru406 Karp, G. (2017). Fotosíntesis y el cloroplasto. In Biología celular y molecular. Conceptos y experimentos, 7e (pp. 1–36). McGraw-Hill Education. accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1139752883 Kaur, G., Singh, G., Motavalli, P. P., Nelson, K. A., Orlowski, J. M., & Golden, B. R. (2020). Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: A review. Agronomy Journal, 112(3), 1475–1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20093 Kochetova, G. V, Avercheva, O. V, Bassarskaya, E. M., & Zhigalova, T. V. (2022). Light quality as a driver of photosynthetic apparatus development. Biophysical Reviews, 14(4), 779–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00985-z Koetle, M. J., Snyman, S. J., & Rutherford, R. S. (2022). Ex vitro Morpho-Physiological Screening of Drought Tolerant Sugarcane Epimutants Generated Via 5-Azacytidine and Imidacloprid Treatments. Tropical Plant Biology, 15(4), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-022-09323-9 Komor, E. (2000). The physiology of sucrose storage in sugarcane. In Developments in Crop Science (Vol. 26, Issue C, pp. 35–53). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-519X(00)80003-3 Kouřil, R., Wientjes, E., Bultema, J. B., Croce, R., & Boekema, E. J. (2013). High-light vs. low-light: Effect of light acclimation on photosystem II composition and organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1827(3), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.12.003 Kromdijk, J., Griffiths, H., & Schepers, H. E. (2010). Can the progressive increase of C4 bundle sheath leakiness at low PFD be explained by incomplete suppression of photorespiration? Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(11), 1935–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02196.x Kromdijk, J., Schepers, H. E., Albanito, F., Fitton, N., Carroll, F., Jones, M. B., Finnan, J., Lanigan, G. J., & Griffiths, H. (2008). Bundle Sheath Leakiness and Light Limitation during C4 Leaf and Canopy CO2 Uptake. Plant Physiology, 148(4), 2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.129890 Kromdijk, J., Ubierna, N., Cousins, A. B., & Griffiths, H. (2014). Bundle-sheath leakiness in C4 photosynthesis: a careful balancing act between CO2 concentration and assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(13), 3443–3457. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru157 Kubásek, J., Urban, O., & Šantrůček, J. (2013). C 4 plants use fluctuating light less efficiently than do C 3 plants: a study of growth, photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination. Physiologia Plantarum, 149(4), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12057 Kumar, D., Singh, H., Raj, S., & Soni, V. (2020). Chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) grown under artificial continuous light. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 24, 100813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100813 Kurepin, L. V., Emery, R. J. N., Pharis, R. P., & Reid, D. M. (2007). Uncoupling light quality from light irradiance effects in Helianthus annuus shoots: putative roles for plant hormones in leaf and internode growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(8), 2145–2157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm068 Lachapelle, P.-P., & Shipley, B. (2012). Interspecific prediction of photosynthetic light response curves using specific leaf mass and leaf nitrogen content: effects of differences in soil fertility and growth irradiance. Annals of Botany, 109(6), 1149–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs032 Larrahondo, J. E., & Villegas, F. (1995). Control y Características de Maduración. In El cultivo de la caña en la zona azucarera de Colombia (p. 412). Laub, M., Pataczek, L., Feuerbacher, A., Zikeli, S., & Högy, P. (2022). Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7 Lee, M., Boyd, R. A., & Ort, D. R. (2022). The photosynthetic response of C 3 and C 4 bioenergy grass species to fluctuating light. GCB Bioenergy, 14(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12899 Ludwig, M. (2013). Evolution of the C4 photosynthetic pathway: events at the cellular and molecular levels. Photosynthesis Research, 117(1–3), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9853-y Lundgren, M. R., Osborne, C. P., & Christin, P.-A. (2014). Deconstructing Kranz anatomy to understand C4 evolution. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(13), 3357–3369. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru186 Mall, R. K., Sonkar, G., Bhatt, D., Sharma, N. K., Baxla, A. K., & Singh, K. K. (2016). Managing impact of extreme weather events in sugarcane in different agro-climatic zones of Uttar Pradesh. Mausam, 67(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v67i1.1187 Maloney, V. J., Park, J.-Y., Unda, F., & Mansfield, S. D. (2015). Sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose phosphate phosphatase interact in planta and promote plant growth and biomass accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(14), 4383–4394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv101 Marchiori, P. E. R., Machado, E. C., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2014). Photosynthetic limitations imposed by self-shading in field-grown sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Research, 155, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.025 Masoabi, M., Snyman, S., & Van der Vyver, C. (2023). Characterisation of an ethyl methanesulfonate‐derived drought‐tolerant sugarcane mutant line. Annals of Applied Biology, 182(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12823 Mathur, S., Jain, L., & Jajoo, A. (2018). Photosynthetic efficiency in sun and shade plants. Photosynthetica, 56(SPECIAL ISSUE), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-018-0767-y McCormick, A. J., Cramer, M. D., & Watt, D. A. (2006). Sink strength regulates photosynthesis in sugarcane. New Phytologist, 171(4), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01785.x McPhaden, M. J. (2003). El Niño and La Niña: Causes and Global Consequences. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, Volume 1, The Earth System: Physical and Chemical Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 1, 353–370. https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/gtmba/featured-publication/el-niño-and-la-niña-causes-and-global-consequences Meisel, L. A., Urbina, D. C., & Pinto, M. E. (2011). Fotorreceptores y Respuestas de Plantas a Señales Lumínicas. Fisiología Vegetal, 18, 1–9. http://www.biouls.cl/librofv/web/pdf_word/Capitulo 18.pdf Melgarejo, L. M., Romero, M., Hernández, S., Barrera, J., Solarte, M. E., Suárez, D., Pérez, L. V., Rojas, A., Cruz, M., Moreno, L., Crespo, S., & Pérez, W. (2010). Experimentos en fisiología vegetal. Plant, Cell and Environment, 34(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-3040.2010.02226.X Minhas, P. S., Rane, J., & Pasala, R. K. (2017). Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture. In P. S. Minhas, J. Rane, & R. K. Pasala (Eds.), Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1 Misra, V., Mall, A. K., Ansari, S. A., & Ansari, M. I. (2022). Sugar Transporters, Sugar-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Their Interaction with Phytohormones in Sugarcane. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10778-z Montero, D., García, C. E., Soto, M., & Valencia, J. M. (2017). Estimación de productividad en caña de azúcar desde la percepción remota. Análisis Geográficos, 53(December), 35–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321973459_Estimacion_de_productividad_en_cana_de_azucar_desde_la_percepcion_remota Moore, P. H., Paterson, A. H., & Tew, T. (2013). Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology. In P. H. Moore & F. C. Botha (Eds.), Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology (John Wiley). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118771280 Moreno, G., Vela, P., & Salcedo Alvarez, Martha, O. (2008). La fluorescencia de la clorofila a como herramienta en la investigación de efectos tóxicos en el aparato fotosintético de plantas y algas. Revista de Educación Bioquímica, 27(4), 119–129. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=49011464003 Moustakas, M., Guidi, L., & Calatayud, A. (2022). Editorial: Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in biotic and abiotic stress, volume II. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1066865 Muhammad, I., Shalmani, A., Ali, M., Yang, Q.-H., Ahmad, H., & Li, F. B. (2021). Mechanisms Regulating the Dynamics of Photosynthesis Under Abiotic Stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 615942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.615942 Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2007). Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1767(6), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019 Murchie, E. H., & Lawson, T. (2013). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(13), 3983–3998. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert208 Nelson, N., & Yocum, C. F. (2006). Structure and function of photosystems I and II. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57(1), 521–565. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105350 Neo, D. C. J., Ong, M. M. X., Lee, Y. Y., Teo, E. J., Ong, Q., Tanoto, H., Xu, J., Ong, K. S., & Suresh, V. (2022). Shaping and Tuning Lighting Conditions in Controlled Environment Agriculture: A Review. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 2(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00241 Noor, M., Fan, J.-B., Zhang, J.-X., Zhang, C.-J., Sun, S.-N., Gan, L., & Yan, X.-B. (2023). Effects of Shade Stress on Growth and Responsive Mechanisms of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 42(7), 4037–4047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10920-5 Palma, C. F. F., Castro-Alves, V., Morales, L. O., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.-O., & Strid, Å. (2021). Spectral Composition of Light Affects Sensitivity to UV-B and Photoinhibition in Cucumber. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.610011 Panigrahy, M., Majeed, N., & Panigrahi, K. C. S. (2020). Low-light and its effects on crop yield: Genetic and genomic implications. Journal of Biosciences, 45(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-020-00070-1 Paradiso, R., & Proietti, S. (2022). Light-Quality Manipulation to Control Plant Growth and Photomorphogenesis in Greenhouse Horticulture: The State of the Art and the Opportunities of Modern LED Systems. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41(2), 742–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10337-y Parthasarathy, N. (1948). Origin of Noble Sugar-Canes (Saccharum officinarum.). Nature, 161(4094), 608–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/161608a0 Pengelly, J. J. L., Sirault, X. R. R., Tazoe, Y., Evans, J. R., Furbank, R. T., & von Caemmerer, S. (2010). Growth of the C4 dicot Flaveria bidentis: photosynthetic acclimation to low light through shifts in leaf anatomy and biochemistry. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(14), 4109–4122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq226 Petro Páez, E. E., Cardozo Conde, C. I., & Rebolledo, M. C. (2018). Caracterización fenotípica de un grupo de diversidad de arroz (Oryza sativa L.) de la subespecie indica en respuesta al estés por baja intensidad lumínica. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/98472 Pignon, C. P., Jaiswal, D., McGrath, J. M., & Long, S. P. (2017). Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C 4 crops? Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(2), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw456 Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Ntagkas, N., Siebenkäs, A., Mäenpää, M., Matsubara, S., & Pons, T. L. (2019). A meta-analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant performance. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1073–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.15754 Romero, E., Scandaliaris, J., Digonzelli, P., Leggio, F., Giardina, J. A., Fernández de Ullivarri, J., Casen, S. D., Tonatto, J., & Alonso, L. (2009). La caña de azúcar, características y ecofisiología. Manual Del Cañero., 15-22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284772525_La_cana_de_azucar_caracteristicas_y_ecofisiologia Roopendra, K., Chandra, A., & Saxena, S. (2019). Increase in Sink Demand in Response to Perturbed Source–Sink Communication by Partial Shading in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 21(4), 672–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0665-4 Ruberti, I., Sessa, G., Ciolfi, A., Possenti, M., Carabelli, M., & Morelli, G. (2012). Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: The shade avoidance response. Biotechnology Advances, 30(5), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.014 Rühle, T., & Leister, D. (2016). Photosystem II Assembly from Scratch. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6(JAN2016), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01234 Sachdeva, M., Bhatia, S., & Batta, S. K. (2011). Sucrose accumulation in sugarcane: a potential target for crop improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33(5), 1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0741-9 Sadras, V. O., Villalobos, F. J., & Fereres, E. (2016). Radiation Interception, Radiation Use Efficiency and Crop Productivity. In Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 169–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46116-8_13 Sage, R. F. (2013). Stopping the leaks: new insights into C 4 photosynthesis at low light. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37(5), 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12246 Sage, R. F., Sage, T. L., & Kocacinar, F. (2012). Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63, 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511 Sagun, J. Ver, Chow, W. S., & Ghannoum, O. (2022). Leaf pigments and photosystems stoichiometry underpin photosynthetic efficiency of related C3, C–C4 and C4 grasses under shade. Physiologia Plantarum, 174(6), e13819. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13819 Sakaigaichi, T., Tsuchida, H., Adachi, K., Hattori, T., Tarumoto, Y., Tanaka, M., Hayano, M., Sakagami, J.-I., & Irei, S. (2019). Phenological Changes in the Chlorophyll Content and Its Fluorescence in Field-Grown Sugarcane Clones Under Over-Wintering Conditions. Sugar Tech, 21(5), 843–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0693-0 Sales, C. R. G., Marchiori, P. E. R., Machado, R. S., Fontenele, A. V., Machado, E. C., Silveira, J. A. G., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2015). Photosynthetic and antioxidant responses to drought during sugarcane ripening. Photosynthetica, 53(4), 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0146-x Sales, C. R. G., Ribeiro, R. V., Marchiori, P. E. R., Kromdijk, J., & Machado, E. C. (2023). The negative impact of shade on photosynthetic efficiency in sugarcane may reflect a metabolic bottleneck. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 211, 105351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105351 Sales, C. R. G., Wang, Y., Evers, J. B., & Kromdijk, J. (2021). Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 5942–5960. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab327 Sales, Cristina R G, Wang, Y., Evers, J. B., & Kromdijk, J. (2021). Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 5942–5960. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab327 Sales, Cristina R.G., Ribeiro, R. V., Hayashi, A. H., Marchiori, P. E. R., Silva, K. I., Martins, M. O., Silveira, J. A. G., Silveira, N. M., & Machado, E. C. (2018). Flexibility of C4 decarboxylation and photosynthetic plasticity in sugarcane plants under shading. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 149, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.027 Salvatori, N., Alberti, G., Muller, O., & Peressotti, A. (2022). Does Fluctuating Light Affect Crop Yield? A Focus on the Dynamic Photosynthesis of Two Soybean Varieties. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.862275 Santos, F., & Diola, V. (2015). Physiology. In Sugarcane (pp. 13–33). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802239-9.00002-5 Satriawan, H., Nazirah, L., Fitri, R., & Ernawita. (2022). Evaluation of growth and yield of upland rice varieties under various shading levels and organic fertilizer concentrations. Biodiversitas, 23(5), 2655–2662. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230549 Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colón-González, F. J., Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wada, Y., … Kabat, P. (2014). Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245–3250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110 Schramma, N., Perugachi Israëls, C., & Jalaal, M. (2023). Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(3), e2216497120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216497120 Schwerz, F., Elli, E. F., Behling, A., Schmidt, D., Caron, B. O., & Sgarbossa, J. (2019). Yield and qualitative traits of sugarcane cultivated in agroforestry systems: Toward sustainable production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 34(4), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000382 Scott, H. G., & Smith, N. G. (2022). A Model of C4 Photosynthetic Acclimation Based on Least‐Cost Optimality Theory Suitable for Earth System Model Incorporation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(3), e2021MS002470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002470 Shafiq, I., Hussain, S., Hassan, B., Shoaib, M., Mumtaz, M., Wang, B., Raza, A., Manaf, A., Ansar, M., Yang, W., & Yang, F. (2020). Effect of simultaneous shade and drought stress on morphology, leaf gas exchange, and yield parameters of different soybean cultivars. Photosynthetica, 58(5), 1200–1209. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2020.067 Shafiq, I., Hussain, S., Raza, M. ali, Iqbal, N., Asghar, M. A., Raza, A., Fan, Y. F., Mumtaz, M., Shoaib, M., Ansar, M., Manaf, A., Yang, W. Y., & YANG, F. (2021). Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63227-0 Shanthi, R. M., Alarmelu, S., Mahadeva Swamy, H. K., & Lakshmi Pathy, T. (2022). Impact of Climate Change on Sucrose Synthesis in Sugarcane Varieties. In Agro-industrial Perspectives on Sugarcane Production under Environmental Stress (pp. 13–38). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3955-6_2 Sharkey, T. D., Bernacchi, C. J., Farquhar, G. D., & Singsaas, E. L. (2007). Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30(9), 1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x Sharkey, T. D., Bock, R., Planck, M., & Plant, M. (2012). Photosynthesis (J. J. Eaton-Rye, B. C. Tripathy, & T. D. Sharkey (eds.); Springer, Vol. 34). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1579-0 Sharma, A., Kumar, V., Shahzad, B., Ramakrishnan, M., Singh Sidhu, G. P., Bali, A. S., Handa, N., Kapoor, D., Yadav, P., Khanna, K., Bakshi, P., Rehman, A., Kohli, S. K., Khan, E. A., Parihar, R. D., Yuan, H., Thukral, A. K., Bhardwaj, R., & Zheng, B. (2020). Photosynthetic Response of Plants Under Different Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 39(2), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10018-x Shi, Y., Ke, X., Yang, X., Liu, Y., & Hou, X. (2022). Plants response to light stress. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 49(8), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2022.04.017 Shibamoto, T., Kato, Y., Sugiura, M., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Redox Potential of the Primary Plastoquinone Electron Acceptor Q A in Photosystem II from Thermosynechococcus elongatus Determined by Spectroelectrochemistry. Biochemistry, 48(45), 10682–10684. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901691j Shimoda, S., & Sugikawa, Y. (2020). Grain‐filling response of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) to post‐anthesis shading in a humid climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 206(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12370 Shrivastava, A. K., Pathak, A. D., Misra, V., Srivastava, S., Swapna, M., & Shukla, S. P. (2017). Sugarcane Crop: Its Tolerance Towards Abiotic Stresses. Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture, 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1_17 Shrivastava, A. K., Solomon, S., Rai, R. K., Singh, P., Chandra, A., Jain, R., & Shukla, S. P. (2015). Physiological Interventions for Enhancing Sugarcane and Sugar Productivity. Sugar Tech, 17(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0321-6 Si, C., Yang, S., Lou, X., Zhang, G., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Effects of light spectrum on the morphophysiology and gene expression of lateral branching in Pepino (Solanum muricatum). Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 3739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1012086 Slattery, R. A., Walker, B. J., Weber, A. P. M., & Ort, D. R. (2018). The Impacts of Fluctuating Light on Crop Performance. Plant Physiology, 176(2), 990–1003. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01234 Smith, A. M., & Stitt, M. (2007). Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment, 30(9), 1126–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01708.x Som-ard, J., Atzberger, C., Izquierdo-Verdiguier, E., Vuolo, F., & Immitzer, M. (2021). Remote Sensing Applications in Sugarcane Cultivation: A Review. Remote Sensing, 13(20), 4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204040 Sonkar, G., Singh, N., Mall, R. K., Singh, K. K., & Gupta, A. (2020). Simulating the Impacts of Climate Change on Sugarcane in Diverse Agro-climatic Zones of Northern India Using CANEGRO-Sugarcane Model. Sugar Tech, 22(3), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00787-w Stinziano, J. R., Morgan, P. B., Lynch, D. J., Saathoff, A. J., McDermitt, D. K., & Hanson, D. T. (2017). The rapid A-C i response: photosynthesis in the phenomic era. Plant, Cell & Environment, 40(8), 1256–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12911 Stirbet, A., Riznichenko, G. Y., Rubin, A. B., & Govindjee. (2014). Modeling chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: Relation to photosynthesis. Biochemistry (Moscow), 79(4), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297914040014 Stirbet, Alexandrina, & Govindjee. (2011). On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and Photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 104(1–2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.12.010 Strasser, R.J., Srivastava, A., & Tsimilli-Michael, M. (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation & Adaptation, May 2014, 443–480. http://ww.hansatech-instruments.com/docs/the fluorescence transient.pdf Strasser, Reto J., Tsimilli-Michael, M., & Srivastava, A. (2004). Analysis of the Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Transient (pp. 321–362). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_12 Swoczyna, T., Kalaji, H. M., Bussotti, F., Mojski, J., & Pollastrini, M. (2022). Environmental stress - what can we learn from chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis in woody plants? A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1048582 Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (2014 Sinauer (ed.); 6th ed., Vol. 6). Takahashi, S., & Badger, M. R. (2011). Photoprotection in plants: a new light on photosystem II damage. Trends in Plant Science, 16(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.001 Tanaka, Y., Adachi, S., & Yamori, W. (2019). Natural genetic variation of the photosynthetic induction response to fluctuating light environment. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 49, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.04.010 Tang, Y., & Liesche, J. (2017). The molecular mechanism of shade avoidance in crops – How data from Arabidopsis can help to identify targets for increasing yield and biomass production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(6), 1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61434-X Taylor, S. H., & Long, S. P. (2017). Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1730), 20160543. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0543 Tazoe, Y., Hanba, Y. T., Furumoto, T., Noguchi, K., & Terashima, I. (2008). Relationships Between Quantum Yield for CO2 Assimilation, Activity of Key Enzymes and CO2 Leakiness in Amaranthus cruentus, a C4 Dicot, Grown in High or Low Light. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm160 Terentyev, V. V. (2022). Macromolecular conformational changes in photosystem II: interaction between structure and function. Biophysical Reviews, 14(4), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00979-x Tsimilli-Michael, M. (2020). Special issue in honour of Prof. Reto J. Strasser - Revisiting JIP-test: An educative review on concepts, assumptions, approximations, definitions and terminology. Photosynthetica, 58(SPECIAL ISSUE), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.150 Valladares, F., & Niinemets, Ü. (2008). Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506 Valladares, F., & Niinemets, Ü. (2008). Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506 van Heerden, P. D. R., Donaldson, R. A., Watt, D. A., & Singels, A. (2010). Biomass accumulation in sugarcane: unravelling the factors underpinning reduced growth phenomena. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(11), 2877–2887. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq144 Vasantha, S., Arun Kumar, • R, Tayade, • A S, Krishnapriya, • V, Ram, • Bakshi, & Solomon, • S. (2021). Physiology of Sucrose Productivity and Implications of Ripeners in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 2021, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12355-021-01062-7 Vasantha, S., Kumar, R. A., Tayade, A. S., Krishnapriya, V., Ram, B., & Solomon, S. (2022). Physiology of Sucrose Productivity and Implications of Ripeners in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 24(3), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01062-7 Viola, S., Roseby, W., Santabarbara, S., Nürnberg, D., Assunção, R., Dau, H., Sellés, J., Boussac, A., Fantuzzi, A., & Rutherford, A. W. (2022). Impact of energy limitations on function and resilience in long-wavelength Photosystem II. ELife, 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79890 von Caemmerer, S. (2000). Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. In Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643103405 von Caemmerer, S., & Furbank, R. T. (2016). Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 31, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003 von Caemmerer, Susanne, & Furbank, R. T. (2016). Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 31, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003 von Caemmerer, Susanne. (2021). Updating the steady-state model of C4 photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 6003–6017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab266 Waheeda, K., Kitchel, H., Wang, Q., & Chiu, P.-L. (2023). Molecular mechanism of Rubisco activase: Dynamic assembly and Rubisco remodeling. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 10, 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1125922 Wan, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Hong, A., Yang, H. Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Shade effects on growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of three Paeonia species. PeerJ, 2020(6). https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.9316/SUPP-3 Wang, J., Nayak, S., Koch, K., & Ming, R. (2013). Carbon partitioning in sugarcane (Saccharum species). Frontiers in Plant Science, 4(JUN), 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00201 Wang, Xiaoyan; Gao, Xinqiang; Liu, Yuling; Fan, Shuli; Ma, Q. (2020). Progress of Research on the Regulatory Pathway of the Plant Shade-Avoidance Syndrome. In Frontiers in Plant Science (Vol. 11, p. 495591). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00439 Wang, Y., Chan, K. X., & Long, S. P. (2021). Towards a dynamic photosynthesis model to guide yield improvement in C4 crops. The Plant Journal, 107(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15365 Wang, Y., Stutz, S. S., Bernacchi, C. J., Boyd, R. A., Ort, D. R., & Long, S. P. (2022). Increased bundle‐sheath leakiness of CO 2 during photosynthetic induction shows a lack of coordination between the C4 and C3 cycles. New Phytologist, 236(5), 1661–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18485 Ward, D. A., & Woolhouse, H. W. (1986). Comparative effects of light during growth on the photosynthetic properties of NADP-ME type C4 grasses from open and shaded habitats. I. Gas exchange, leaf anatomy and ultrastructure. Plant, Cell and Environment, 9(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-3040.ep11611679 Watson‐Lazowski, A., Papanicolaou, A., Koller, F., & Ghannoum, O. (2020). The transcriptomic responses of C 4 grasses to subambient CO 2 and low light are largely species specific and only refined by photosynthetic subtype. The Plant Journal, 101(5), 1170–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14583 Wimalasekera, R. (2019). Effect of Light Intensity on Photosynthesis. In Photosynthesis, Productivity and Environmental Stress (pp. 65–73). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119501800.ch4 Xia, H., Chen, K., Liu, L., Plenkovic-Moraj, A., Sun, G., & Lei, Y. (2022). Photosynthetic regulation in fluctuating light under combined stresses of high temperature and dehydration in three contrasting mosses. Plant Science, 323, 111379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111379 Xie, F., Shi, Z., Zhang, G., Zhang, C., Sun, X., Yan, Y., Zhao, W., Guo, Z., Zhang, L., Fahad, S., Saud, S., & Chen, Y. (2020). Quantitative leaf anatomy and photophysiology systems of C3 and C4 turfgrasses in response to shading. Scientia Horticulturae, 274, 109674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109674 Yamori, W. (2016). Photosynthetic response to fluctuating environments and photoprotective strategies under abiotic stress. Journal of Plant Research, 129(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-016-0816-1 Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., & Yang, W. (2014). Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crops Research, 155, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.011 Yang, J., Li, C., Kong, D., Guo, F., & Wei, H. (2020). Light-Mediated Signaling and Metabolic Changes Coordinate Stomatal Opening and Closure. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601478 Yao, X., Li, C., Li, S., Zhu, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Yu, C., St. Martin, S. K., & Xie, F. (2017). Effect of shade on leaf photosynthetic capacity, light-intercepting, electron transfer and energy distribution of soybeans. Plant Growth Regulation, 83(3), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0307-y Yin, X., & Struik, P. C. (2018). The energy budget in C 4 photosynthesis: insights from a cell-type-specific electron transport model. New Phytologist, 218(3), 986–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15051 Yin, X., Sun, Z., Struik, P. C., Van Der Putten, P. E. L., Van Ieperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2011). Using a biochemical C4 photosynthesis model and combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements to estimate bundle-sheath conductance of maize leaves differing in age and nitrogen content. Plant, Cell and Environment, 34(12), 2183–2199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02414.x Yu, D., Zha, Y., Shi, L., Ye, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Improving sugarcane growth simulations by integrating multi-source observations into a crop model. European Journal of Agronomy, 132, 126410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126410 Zahra, N., Al Hinai, M. S., Hafeez, M. B., Rehman, A., Wahid, A., Siddique, K. H. M., & Farooq, M. (2022). Regulation of photosynthesis under salt stress and associated tolerance mechanisms. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 178, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.003 Zhang, H., Zhong, H., Wang, J., Sui, X., & Xu, N. (2016). Adaptive changes in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic features to low light in Physocarpus amurensis Maxim and Physocarpus opulifolius “Diabolo.” PeerJ, 4(6), e2125. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2125 Zhao, D., & Li, Y.-R. (2015). Climate Change and Sugarcane Production: Potential Impact and Mitigation Strategies. International Journal of Agronomy, 2015(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386 Zheng, L., & Van Labeke, M.-C. (2017). Chrysanthemum morphology, photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant capacity are differentially modified by light quality. Journal of Plant Physiology, 213, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.005 Zhou, Q., Zhao, F., Zhang, H., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Responses of the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, endogenous hormones and antioxidant activity of Carpinus betulus L. seedlings to different light intensities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1055984 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
xx, 129 páginas + anexos |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Palmira |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Palmira - Ciencias Agropecuarias - Maestría en Ciencias Agrarias |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Palmira, Valle del Cauca, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Palmira |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/3/1144172713.2023.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/4/1144172713.2023.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a a3c5b7dc552f7e72c129946f81b888c7 8d639a3fda5d2ea38f20c5f55290384d |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814089856178978816 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Quevedo Amaya, Yeison Mauricioe8d251bc209b3def40f3160f1ba2f93dMejía de Tafur, María Saracb097b6338b633ba1cedf4fe9e37adfcCepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes8ff5755a2e827b502d1c5b2214963920Cepeda Quevedo, Aura Mercedes [0000-0003-2332-4158]2024-01-16T21:33:27Z2024-01-16T21:33:27Z2023-08https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85339Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/Ilustraciones, tablasLa radiación solar (RS) es vital para la fotosíntesis, pero su variabilidad puede afectar el rendimiento del cultivo y desencadenar respuestas fisiológicas y adaptativas para mantener el equilibrio metabólico. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar la respuesta fisiológica a la baja RS en dos variedades de caña de azúcar en la etapa de maduración en Colombia. Se evaluaron cuatro condiciones: campo abierto (0%) y tres niveles de reducción de RS (67, 80 y 95%) usando mallas de color negro. Se identificaron estrategias de adaptación, se determinó la eficiencia fotoquímica, fotosintética, el efecto en la partición de fotoasimilados y acumulación de sacarosa. Como estrategia de adaptación, la variedad CC 01-678 incrementó el SPAD para tolerar la sombra. Mientras que, la variedad CC 05- 430 incrementó su crecimiento apical para evitar la sombra, favoreciendo la captación y uso de la RS en ambientes limitantes. Aunque se observaron diferencias entre variedades e interacciones en ciertos parámetros, estas diferencias no fueron consistentes en las siete semanas de evaluación. Sin embargo, la RS resultó ser el factor principal en las respuestas fisiológicas, los tres niveles de baja RS (67, 80 y 95%) mostraron similitudes notables entre sí, pero difirieron significativamente del testigo (0%). La baja RS afectó negativamente la oxidación de QA- y generó un bloqueo que incrementó la emisión de fluorescencia, disminuyó la tasa de transporte de electrones, y el rendimiento operacional del PSII. Dichas alteraciones disminuyeron la velocidad de producción de ATP y NADPH, reduciéndose la fotosíntesis, el punto de compensación de luz, la respiración y la actividad de RuBisCO. La ralentización de las reacciones del ciclo de Calvin-Benson, disminuyeron la eficiencia fotosintética y la calidad del jugo de la caña de azúcar, resultando en la perdida de entre 1 y 2 unidades porcentuales de sacarosa durante las siete semanas de RS limitada. (Texto tomado de la fuente)Solar radiation (SR) is essential for photosynthesis, but its variability can impact crop yield and trigger physiological and adaptive responses to maintain metabolic balance. The aim of the study was to determine the physiological response to low SR in two sugarcane varieties during the ripening stage in Colombia. Four conditions were evaluated: open field (0%) and three levels of SR reduction (67, 80, and 95%) using black shading nets. Adaptation strategies were identified, and photochemical and photosynthetic efficiency, as well as the effect on photoassimilate partitioning and sucrose accumulation, were determined. As an adaptation strategy, variety CC 01-678 increased SPAD to tolerate shade, while CC 05-430 variety increased apical growth to avoid shade, promoting the capture and utilization of SR in limiting environments. Although differences were observed between varieties and interactions in certain parameters, these differences were not consistent over the seven weeks of evaluation. However, SR was the primary factor in physiological responses, as the three low SR levels (67, 80, and 95%) showed notable similarities among themselves but significantly differed from the control (0%). Low SR negatively affected QA- oxidation, leading to a blockage that increased fluorescence emission, reduced the electron transport rate, and reduced the operational efficiency of PSII. These alterations decreased ATP and NADPH production rates, resulting in decreased photosynthesis, light compensation point, respiration, and RuBisCO activity. Slowing down the Calvin-Benson cycle reactions decreased photosynthetic efficiency and the quality of sugarcane juice, resulting in a loss of between 1 and 2 percentage units of sucrose during the seven weeks of limited SR.El centro de investigación de la caña de azúcar es financiado por la agroindustria de la caña de azúcar de Colombia ubicado principalmente en la región del valle del río Cauca y Meta. Cenicaña se destaca actualmente por su enfoque en la investigación científica de la caña de azúcar, buscando identificar y maximizar sus aplicaciones en diversos sectores industriales. Como plataforma progresista, su objetivo principal es generar oportunidades que impulsen el progreso sostenible, contribuyendo al desarrollo económico, ambiental y social del país a través de la aplicación de innovaciones en la agroindustria de la caña de azúcar. La entidad se posiciona como un agente clave que no solo investiga las posibilidades de este cultivo, sino que también lidera la transformación positiva de la agroindustria, influyendo en su evolución hacia prácticas más sostenibles.MaestríaMagíster en Ciencias AgrariasLa metodología aplicada fue el método científico. Se identificó el problema y formuló una hipótesis, conduciendo al diseño experimental y montaje en campo. La recolección de datos siguió el protocolo establecido donde se analizaron variables fisiológicas en el cultivo de la caña de azúcar, seguido por un análisis estadístico para obtener resultados significativos. La fase final incluyó una discusión de los resultados, relacionándolos con la hipótesis inicial y los objetivos de la investigación. Finalmente, se derivaron conclusiones que resumen los hallazgos del estudio y su implicación en el cultivo de la caña de azúcar.Fisiología de CultivosCiencias Agropecuarias.Sede Palmiraxx, 129 páginas + anexosapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia sede PalmiraPalmira - Ciencias Agropecuarias - Maestría en Ciencias AgrariasFacultad de Ciencias AgropecuariasPalmira, Valle del Cauca, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Palmira630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadasFisiología VegetalPlant physiologyAdaptación fisiológicaPhysiological adaptationSucrosaSucroseCaña de azúcarSugar caneSombraFotosíntesis C4Fluorescencia de la clorofilaTransitorio OJIPTransporte de electronesRendimiento cuánticoSacarosaShadeC4 photosynthesisOJIP transientsChlorophyll fluorescenceElectron transportQuantum yieldFisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduraciónPhysiology of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) in response to low radiation during the ripening stageTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMArce Cubas, L., Vath, R. L., Bernardo, E. L., Sales, C. R. G., Burnett, A. C., & Kromdijk, J. (2023). Activation of CO2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C4 than in C3 photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 5323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115Abreu, P. P., Souza, M. M., de Almeida, A. A. F., Santos, E. A., Freitas, J. C. de O., & Figueiredo, A. L. (2014). Photosynthetic responses of ornamental passion flower hybrids to varying light intensities. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36(8), 1993–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11738-014-1574-0/FIGURES/4Akhkha, A. (2010). Modelling photosynthetic light-response curve in Calotropis procera under salinity or water deficit stress using non-linear models. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 3(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1658-3655(12)60020-XAlmeida, R. L., Silveira, N. M., Miranda, M. T., Pacheco, V. S., Cruz, L. P., Xavier, M. A., Machado, E. C., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2022). Evidence of photosynthetic acclimation to self-shading in sugarcane canopies. Photosynthetica, 60(4), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2022.045Almeida, R. L., Silveira, N. M., Pacheco, V. S., Xavier, M. A., Ribeiro, R. V., & Machado, E. C. (2021). Variability and heritability of photosynthetic traits in Saccharum complex. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 33(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00217-xArce Cubas, L., Vath, R. L., Bernardo, E. L., Sales, C. R. G., Burnett, A. C., & Kromdijk, J. (2023). Activation of CO2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C4 than in C3 photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 5323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115Asocaña. (2022). Un dulce sabor que se trasforma. Informe anual 2021 – 2022. Sector Agroindustrial de la Caña. http://www.asocana.org/documentos/672022-B663EF18-00FF00,000A000,878787,C3C3C3,0F0F0F,B4B4B4,FF00FF,FFFFFF,2D2D2D,A3C4B5.pdfÁvila-Zárraga, J. G. (2009). Síntesis fotoquímica mediante luz solar. Educación Química, 20(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30046-6Azcón-Bieto, J., & Talón, M. (2003). Fundamentos de fisiología vegetal. In McGrawHill.Bąba, W., Kompała-Bąba, A., Zabochnicka-świątek, M., Luźniak, J., Hanczaruk, R., Adamski, A., & Kalaji, H. M. (2019). Discovering trends in photosynthesis using modern analytical tools: More than 100 reasons to use chlorophyll fluorescence. In Photosynthetica (Vol. 57, Issue 2, pp. 668–679). https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.069Baker, N. R. (2008). Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759Baker, N. R., Harbinson, J., & Kramer, D. M. (2007). Determining the limitations and regulation of photosynthetic energy transduction in leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30(9), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01680.xBakker, H. (1999). The Morphology of the Sugar Cane Plant. In Sugar Cane Cultivation and Management (pp. 3–8). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4725-9_2Ballaré, C. L. (2014). Light Regulation of Plant Defense. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65(1), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040145Banks, J. M. (2017). Continuous excitation chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: a review for practitioners. Tree Physiology, 37(8), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx059Beed, F. D., Paveley, N. D., & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2007). Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 145(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859606006678Bhat, J. Y., Thieulin-Pardo, G., Hartl, F. U., & Hayer-Hartl, M. (2017). Rubisco Activases: AAA+ Chaperones Adapted to Enzyme Repair. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 4(APR), 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00020Boyd, R. A., Gandin, A., & Cousins, A. B. (2015). Temperature response of C4 photosynthesis: Biochemical analysis of Rubisco, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and Carbonic Anhydrase in Setaria viridis. Plant Physiology, 169(3), pp.00586.2015. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00586Calvache Ulloa, M., & Valle, L. (2021). Índice de cosecha con macro-nutrientes en grano de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Revista Alfa, 5(13), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v5i13.95Cardozo, N. P., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2013). Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Scientia Agricola, 70(6), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000600011Castillo, R. O., & Silva Cifuentes, E. (2022). Sugarcane Breeding and Supporting Genetics Research in Ecuador. Sugar Tech, 24(1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01057-4Castro, O. R. (2010). La variabilidad de la radiación solar en la superficie terrestre y sus efectos en la producción de caña de azúcar en Guatemala. https://cengicana.org/files/20150828053605989.pdfCENICAÑA. (2021). Informe Anual 2021. Centro de Investigación de La Caña de Azúcar de Colombia, 138. https://www.cenicana.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ia2021_Abril13_2022.pdfChen, James. C. P. (1991). Manual del Azucar de Caña.Collison, R. F., Raven, E. C., Pignon, C. P., & Long, S. P. (2020). Light, Not Age, Underlies the Maladaptation of Maize and Miscanthus Photosynthesis to Self-Shading. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00783Dai, Y., Shen, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, L., Hannaway, D., & Lu, H. (2009). Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65(2–3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008De Matos, M., Santos, F., & Eichler, P. (2020). Sugarcane world scenario. In Sugarcane Biorefinery, Technology and Perspectives (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814236-3.00001-9De Souza, A. P., Wang, Y., Orr, D. J., Carmo‐Silva, E., & Long, S. P. (2020). Photosynthesis across African cassava germplasm is limited by Rubisco and mesophyll conductance at steady state, but by stomatal conductance in fluctuating light. New Phytologist, 225(6), 2498–2512. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16142Demarsy, E., Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., & Ulm, R. (2018). Coping with ‘Dark Sides of the Sun’ through Photoreceptor Signaling. Trends in Plant Science, 23(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.11.007Denton, A. K., Simon, R., & Weber, A. P. M. (2013). C4 photosynthesis: from evolutionary analyses to strategies for synthetic reconstruction of the trait. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 16(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.013Díaz-Torres, J. J., Hernández-Mena, L., Murillo-Tovar, M. A., León-Becerril, E., López-López, A., Suárez-Plascencia, C., Aviña-Rodriguez, E., Barradas-Gimate, A., & Ojeda-Castillo, V. (2017). Assessment of the modulation effect of rainfall on solar radiation availability at the Earth’s surface. Meteorological Applications, 24(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1616Dinesh Babu, K. S., Janakiraman, V., Palaniswamy, H., Kasirajan, L., Gomathi, R., & Ramkumar, T. R. (2022). A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 69(8), 2623–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01430-6Durand, M., Murchie, E. H., Lindfors, A. V., Urban, O., Aphalo, P. J., & Robson, T. M. (2021). Diffuse solar radiation and canopy photosynthesis in a changing environment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 311, 108684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108684Ermakova, M., Bellasio, C., Fitzpatrick, D., Furbank, R. T., Mamedov, F., & von Caemmerer, S. (2021). Upregulation of bundle sheath electron transport capacity under limiting light in C 4 Setaria viridis. The Plant Journal, 106(5), 1443–1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15247Fang, S., Lang, T., Cai, M., & Han, T. (2022). Light keys open locks of plant photoresponses: A review of phosphors for plant cultivation LEDs. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 902, 163825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163825Fankhauser, C., & Chory, J. (1997). Light control of plant development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 13(1), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.203FAO. (2020). Sugarcane | Land & Water | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Land & Water | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information/sugarcane/en/FAO. (2022). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2022. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2211enFAOSTAT. (2021). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualizeFiorucci, A.-S., & Fankhauser, C. (2017). Plant Strategies for Enhancing Access to Sunlight. Current Biology, 27(17), R931–R940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.085Flack‐Prain, S., Shi, L., Zhu, P., Rocha, H. R., Cabral, O., Hu, S., & Williams, M. (2021). The impact of climate change and climate extremes on sugarcane production. GCB Bioenergy, 13(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12797Franić, M., Jambrović, A., Zdunić, Z., Šimić, D., & Galić, V. (2020). Photosynthetic properties of maize hybrids under different environmental conditions probed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence. Maydica, 64(3).Gao, P., Wang, P., Du, B., Li, P., & Kang, B.-H. (2022). Accelerated remodeling of the mesophyll-bundle sheath interface in the maize C4 cycle mutant leaves. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5057. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09135-7Givnish, T. (1988). Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective. Functional Plant Biology, 15(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880063Goltsev, V. N., Kalaji, H. M., Paunov, M., Bąba, W., Horaczek, T., Mojski, J., Kociel, H., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2016). Variable chlorophyll fluorescence and its use for assessing physiological condition of plant photosynthetic apparatus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 63(6), 869–893. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443716050058Gong, X., Liu, C., Dang, K., Wang, H., Du, W., Qi, H., Jiang, Y., & Feng, B. (2022). Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Source Leaf Adaptation to Shading Stress Affects Not Only Photosynthetic Physiology Metabolism but Also Control of Key Gene Expression. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.753264Gregoriou, K., Pontikis, K., & Vemmos, S. (2007). Effects of reduced irradiance on leaf morphology, photosynthetic capacity, and fruit yield in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica, 45(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0029-xHe, Q., & Li, D. (2021). Assessing shade stress in leaves of turf-type tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Photosynthetica, 59(4), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2021.037Herrmann, H. A., Schwartz, J.-M., & Johnson, G. N. (2020). From empirical to theoretical models of light response curves - linking photosynthetic and metabolic acclimation. Photosynthesis Research, 145(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-019-00681-2Hitchcock, A., Hunter, C. N., Sobotka, R., Komenda, J., Dann, M., & Leister, D. (2022). Redesigning the photosynthetic light reactions to enhance photosynthesis – the PhotoRedesign consortium. The Plant Journal, 109(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15552Huang, D., Wu, L., Chen, J. R., & Dong, L. (2011). Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels. Photosynthetica, 49(4), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-011-0076-1Humbert, R. P., & Bonnet, J. A. (1963). The Growing of Sugar Cane. Soil Science, 107(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196903000-00021Hussain, S., Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ali, S., & Khan, I. (2019). Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Aspects of Seed Priming. In Priming and Pretreatment of Seeds and Seedlings (pp. 43–62). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8625-1_3IDEAM. (2022). BOLETÍN DE MONITOREO FENOMENO EL NIÑO Y LA NIÑA - IDEAM. http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/tiempo-y-clima/boletin-de-seguimiento-fenomeno-el-nino-y-la-nina/-/document_library_display/I6NwA8DioHgN/view/121539941?_110_INSTANCE_I6NwA8DioHgN_redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ideam.gov.co%2Fweb%2Ftiempo-y-clima%2Fboletin-de-seguiJaiswal, R., Mall, R. K., Patel, S., Singh, N., Mendiratta, N., & Gupta, A. (2023). Indian sugarcane under warming climate: A simulation study. European Journal of Agronomy, 144, 126760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126760James, N. I. (1980). Sugarcane. In Hybridization of Crop Plants (pp. 617–629). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2135/1980.hybridizationofcrops.c44Kabir, M. Y., Nambeesan, S. U., & Díaz-Pérez, J. C. (2023). Carbon dioxide and light curves and leaf gas exchange responses to shade levels in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Science, 326, 111532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111532Kaiser, E., Morales, A., Harbinson, J., Kromdijk, J., Heuvelink, E., & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2015). Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(9), 2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru406Karp, G. (2017). Fotosíntesis y el cloroplasto. In Biología celular y molecular. Conceptos y experimentos, 7e (pp. 1–36). McGraw-Hill Education. accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1139752883Kaur, G., Singh, G., Motavalli, P. P., Nelson, K. A., Orlowski, J. M., & Golden, B. R. (2020). Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: A review. Agronomy Journal, 112(3), 1475–1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20093Kochetova, G. V, Avercheva, O. V, Bassarskaya, E. M., & Zhigalova, T. V. (2022). Light quality as a driver of photosynthetic apparatus development. Biophysical Reviews, 14(4), 779–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00985-zKoetle, M. J., Snyman, S. J., & Rutherford, R. S. (2022). Ex vitro Morpho-Physiological Screening of Drought Tolerant Sugarcane Epimutants Generated Via 5-Azacytidine and Imidacloprid Treatments. Tropical Plant Biology, 15(4), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-022-09323-9Komor, E. (2000). The physiology of sucrose storage in sugarcane. In Developments in Crop Science (Vol. 26, Issue C, pp. 35–53). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-519X(00)80003-3Kouřil, R., Wientjes, E., Bultema, J. B., Croce, R., & Boekema, E. J. (2013). High-light vs. low-light: Effect of light acclimation on photosystem II composition and organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1827(3), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.12.003Kromdijk, J., Griffiths, H., & Schepers, H. E. (2010). Can the progressive increase of C4 bundle sheath leakiness at low PFD be explained by incomplete suppression of photorespiration? Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(11), 1935–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02196.xKromdijk, J., Schepers, H. E., Albanito, F., Fitton, N., Carroll, F., Jones, M. B., Finnan, J., Lanigan, G. J., & Griffiths, H. (2008). Bundle Sheath Leakiness and Light Limitation during C4 Leaf and Canopy CO2 Uptake. Plant Physiology, 148(4), 2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.129890Kromdijk, J., Ubierna, N., Cousins, A. B., & Griffiths, H. (2014). Bundle-sheath leakiness in C4 photosynthesis: a careful balancing act between CO2 concentration and assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(13), 3443–3457. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru157Kubásek, J., Urban, O., & Šantrůček, J. (2013). C 4 plants use fluctuating light less efficiently than do C 3 plants: a study of growth, photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination. Physiologia Plantarum, 149(4), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12057Kumar, D., Singh, H., Raj, S., & Soni, V. (2020). Chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) grown under artificial continuous light. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 24, 100813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100813Kurepin, L. V., Emery, R. J. N., Pharis, R. P., & Reid, D. M. (2007). Uncoupling light quality from light irradiance effects in Helianthus annuus shoots: putative roles for plant hormones in leaf and internode growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(8), 2145–2157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm068Lachapelle, P.-P., & Shipley, B. (2012). Interspecific prediction of photosynthetic light response curves using specific leaf mass and leaf nitrogen content: effects of differences in soil fertility and growth irradiance. Annals of Botany, 109(6), 1149–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs032Larrahondo, J. E., & Villegas, F. (1995). Control y Características de Maduración. In El cultivo de la caña en la zona azucarera de Colombia (p. 412).Laub, M., Pataczek, L., Feuerbacher, A., Zikeli, S., & Högy, P. (2022). Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7Lee, M., Boyd, R. A., & Ort, D. R. (2022). The photosynthetic response of C 3 and C 4 bioenergy grass species to fluctuating light. GCB Bioenergy, 14(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12899Ludwig, M. (2013). Evolution of the C4 photosynthetic pathway: events at the cellular and molecular levels. Photosynthesis Research, 117(1–3), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9853-yLundgren, M. R., Osborne, C. P., & Christin, P.-A. (2014). Deconstructing Kranz anatomy to understand C4 evolution. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(13), 3357–3369. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru186Mall, R. K., Sonkar, G., Bhatt, D., Sharma, N. K., Baxla, A. K., & Singh, K. K. (2016). Managing impact of extreme weather events in sugarcane in different agro-climatic zones of Uttar Pradesh. Mausam, 67(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v67i1.1187Maloney, V. J., Park, J.-Y., Unda, F., & Mansfield, S. D. (2015). Sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose phosphate phosphatase interact in planta and promote plant growth and biomass accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(14), 4383–4394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv101Marchiori, P. E. R., Machado, E. C., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2014). Photosynthetic limitations imposed by self-shading in field-grown sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Research, 155, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.025Masoabi, M., Snyman, S., & Van der Vyver, C. (2023). Characterisation of an ethyl methanesulfonate‐derived drought‐tolerant sugarcane mutant line. Annals of Applied Biology, 182(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12823Mathur, S., Jain, L., & Jajoo, A. (2018). Photosynthetic efficiency in sun and shade plants. Photosynthetica, 56(SPECIAL ISSUE), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-018-0767-yMcCormick, A. J., Cramer, M. D., & Watt, D. A. (2006). Sink strength regulates photosynthesis in sugarcane. New Phytologist, 171(4), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01785.xMcPhaden, M. J. (2003). El Niño and La Niña: Causes and Global Consequences. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, Volume 1, The Earth System: Physical and Chemical Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 1, 353–370. https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/gtmba/featured-publication/el-niño-and-la-niña-causes-and-global-consequencesMeisel, L. A., Urbina, D. C., & Pinto, M. E. (2011). Fotorreceptores y Respuestas de Plantas a Señales Lumínicas. Fisiología Vegetal, 18, 1–9. http://www.biouls.cl/librofv/web/pdf_word/Capitulo 18.pdfMelgarejo, L. M., Romero, M., Hernández, S., Barrera, J., Solarte, M. E., Suárez, D., Pérez, L. V., Rojas, A., Cruz, M., Moreno, L., Crespo, S., & Pérez, W. (2010). Experimentos en fisiología vegetal. Plant, Cell and Environment, 34(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-3040.2010.02226.XMinhas, P. S., Rane, J., & Pasala, R. K. (2017). Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture. In P. S. Minhas, J. Rane, & R. K. Pasala (Eds.), Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1Misra, V., Mall, A. K., Ansari, S. A., & Ansari, M. I. (2022). Sugar Transporters, Sugar-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Their Interaction with Phytohormones in Sugarcane. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10778-zMontero, D., García, C. E., Soto, M., & Valencia, J. M. (2017). Estimación de productividad en caña de azúcar desde la percepción remota. Análisis Geográficos, 53(December), 35–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321973459_Estimacion_de_productividad_en_cana_de_azucar_desde_la_percepcion_remotaMoore, P. H., Paterson, A. H., & Tew, T. (2013). Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology. In P. H. Moore & F. C. Botha (Eds.), Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology (John Wiley). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118771280Moreno, G., Vela, P., & Salcedo Alvarez, Martha, O. (2008). La fluorescencia de la clorofila a como herramienta en la investigación de efectos tóxicos en el aparato fotosintético de plantas y algas. Revista de Educación Bioquímica, 27(4), 119–129. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=49011464003Moustakas, M., Guidi, L., & Calatayud, A. (2022). Editorial: Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in biotic and abiotic stress, volume II. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1066865Muhammad, I., Shalmani, A., Ali, M., Yang, Q.-H., Ahmad, H., & Li, F. B. (2021). Mechanisms Regulating the Dynamics of Photosynthesis Under Abiotic Stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 615942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.615942Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2007). Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1767(6), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019Murchie, E. H., & Lawson, T. (2013). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(13), 3983–3998. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert208Nelson, N., & Yocum, C. F. (2006). Structure and function of photosystems I and II. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57(1), 521–565. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105350Neo, D. C. J., Ong, M. M. X., Lee, Y. Y., Teo, E. J., Ong, Q., Tanoto, H., Xu, J., Ong, K. S., & Suresh, V. (2022). Shaping and Tuning Lighting Conditions in Controlled Environment Agriculture: A Review. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology, 2(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00241Noor, M., Fan, J.-B., Zhang, J.-X., Zhang, C.-J., Sun, S.-N., Gan, L., & Yan, X.-B. (2023). Effects of Shade Stress on Growth and Responsive Mechanisms of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 42(7), 4037–4047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10920-5Palma, C. F. F., Castro-Alves, V., Morales, L. O., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.-O., & Strid, Å. (2021). Spectral Composition of Light Affects Sensitivity to UV-B and Photoinhibition in Cucumber. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.610011Panigrahy, M., Majeed, N., & Panigrahi, K. C. S. (2020). Low-light and its effects on crop yield: Genetic and genomic implications. Journal of Biosciences, 45(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-020-00070-1Paradiso, R., & Proietti, S. (2022). Light-Quality Manipulation to Control Plant Growth and Photomorphogenesis in Greenhouse Horticulture: The State of the Art and the Opportunities of Modern LED Systems. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41(2), 742–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10337-yParthasarathy, N. (1948). Origin of Noble Sugar-Canes (Saccharum officinarum.). Nature, 161(4094), 608–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/161608a0Pengelly, J. J. L., Sirault, X. R. R., Tazoe, Y., Evans, J. R., Furbank, R. T., & von Caemmerer, S. (2010). Growth of the C4 dicot Flaveria bidentis: photosynthetic acclimation to low light through shifts in leaf anatomy and biochemistry. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(14), 4109–4122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq226Petro Páez, E. E., Cardozo Conde, C. I., & Rebolledo, M. C. (2018). Caracterización fenotípica de un grupo de diversidad de arroz (Oryza sativa L.) de la subespecie indica en respuesta al estés por baja intensidad lumínica. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/98472Pignon, C. P., Jaiswal, D., McGrath, J. M., & Long, S. P. (2017). Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C 4 crops? Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(2), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw456Poorter, H., Niinemets, Ü., Ntagkas, N., Siebenkäs, A., Mäenpää, M., Matsubara, S., & Pons, T. L. (2019). A meta-analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant performance. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1073–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.15754Romero, E., Scandaliaris, J., Digonzelli, P., Leggio, F., Giardina, J. A., Fernández de Ullivarri, J., Casen, S. D., Tonatto, J., & Alonso, L. (2009). La caña de azúcar, características y ecofisiología. Manual Del Cañero., 15-22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284772525_La_cana_de_azucar_caracteristicas_y_ecofisiologiaRoopendra, K., Chandra, A., & Saxena, S. (2019). Increase in Sink Demand in Response to Perturbed Source–Sink Communication by Partial Shading in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 21(4), 672–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0665-4Ruberti, I., Sessa, G., Ciolfi, A., Possenti, M., Carabelli, M., & Morelli, G. (2012). Plant adaptation to dynamically changing environment: The shade avoidance response. Biotechnology Advances, 30(5), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.014Rühle, T., & Leister, D. (2016). Photosystem II Assembly from Scratch. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6(JAN2016), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01234Sachdeva, M., Bhatia, S., & Batta, S. K. (2011). Sucrose accumulation in sugarcane: a potential target for crop improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33(5), 1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0741-9Sadras, V. O., Villalobos, F. J., & Fereres, E. (2016). Radiation Interception, Radiation Use Efficiency and Crop Productivity. In Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 169–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46116-8_13Sage, R. F. (2013). Stopping the leaks: new insights into C 4 photosynthesis at low light. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37(5), 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12246Sage, R. F., Sage, T. L., & Kocacinar, F. (2012). Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63, 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511Sagun, J. Ver, Chow, W. S., & Ghannoum, O. (2022). Leaf pigments and photosystems stoichiometry underpin photosynthetic efficiency of related C3, C–C4 and C4 grasses under shade. Physiologia Plantarum, 174(6), e13819. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13819Sakaigaichi, T., Tsuchida, H., Adachi, K., Hattori, T., Tarumoto, Y., Tanaka, M., Hayano, M., Sakagami, J.-I., & Irei, S. (2019). Phenological Changes in the Chlorophyll Content and Its Fluorescence in Field-Grown Sugarcane Clones Under Over-Wintering Conditions. Sugar Tech, 21(5), 843–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0693-0Sales, C. R. G., Marchiori, P. E. R., Machado, R. S., Fontenele, A. V., Machado, E. C., Silveira, J. A. G., & Ribeiro, R. V. (2015). Photosynthetic and antioxidant responses to drought during sugarcane ripening. Photosynthetica, 53(4), 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0146-xSales, C. R. G., Ribeiro, R. V., Marchiori, P. E. R., Kromdijk, J., & Machado, E. C. (2023). The negative impact of shade on photosynthetic efficiency in sugarcane may reflect a metabolic bottleneck. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 211, 105351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105351Sales, C. R. G., Wang, Y., Evers, J. B., & Kromdijk, J. (2021). Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 5942–5960. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab327Sales, Cristina R G, Wang, Y., Evers, J. B., & Kromdijk, J. (2021). Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 5942–5960. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab327Sales, Cristina R.G., Ribeiro, R. V., Hayashi, A. H., Marchiori, P. E. R., Silva, K. I., Martins, M. O., Silveira, J. A. G., Silveira, N. M., & Machado, E. C. (2018). Flexibility of C4 decarboxylation and photosynthetic plasticity in sugarcane plants under shading. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 149, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.027Salvatori, N., Alberti, G., Muller, O., & Peressotti, A. (2022). Does Fluctuating Light Affect Crop Yield? A Focus on the Dynamic Photosynthesis of Two Soybean Varieties. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.862275Santos, F., & Diola, V. (2015). Physiology. In Sugarcane (pp. 13–33). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802239-9.00002-5Satriawan, H., Nazirah, L., Fitri, R., & Ernawita. (2022). Evaluation of growth and yield of upland rice varieties under various shading levels and organic fertilizer concentrations. Biodiversitas, 23(5), 2655–2662. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230549Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colón-González, F. J., Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wada, Y., … Kabat, P. (2014). Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245–3250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110Schramma, N., Perugachi Israëls, C., & Jalaal, M. (2023). Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(3), e2216497120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216497120Schwerz, F., Elli, E. F., Behling, A., Schmidt, D., Caron, B. O., & Sgarbossa, J. (2019). Yield and qualitative traits of sugarcane cultivated in agroforestry systems: Toward sustainable production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 34(4), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000382Scott, H. G., & Smith, N. G. (2022). A Model of C4 Photosynthetic Acclimation Based on Least‐Cost Optimality Theory Suitable for Earth System Model Incorporation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(3), e2021MS002470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002470Shafiq, I., Hussain, S., Hassan, B., Shoaib, M., Mumtaz, M., Wang, B., Raza, A., Manaf, A., Ansar, M., Yang, W., & Yang, F. (2020). Effect of simultaneous shade and drought stress on morphology, leaf gas exchange, and yield parameters of different soybean cultivars. Photosynthetica, 58(5), 1200–1209. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2020.067Shafiq, I., Hussain, S., Raza, M. ali, Iqbal, N., Asghar, M. A., Raza, A., Fan, Y. F., Mumtaz, M., Shoaib, M., Ansar, M., Manaf, A., Yang, W. Y., & YANG, F. (2021). Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63227-0Shanthi, R. M., Alarmelu, S., Mahadeva Swamy, H. K., & Lakshmi Pathy, T. (2022). Impact of Climate Change on Sucrose Synthesis in Sugarcane Varieties. In Agro-industrial Perspectives on Sugarcane Production under Environmental Stress (pp. 13–38). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3955-6_2Sharkey, T. D., Bernacchi, C. J., Farquhar, G. D., & Singsaas, E. L. (2007). Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30(9), 1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.xSharkey, T. D., Bock, R., Planck, M., & Plant, M. (2012). Photosynthesis (J. J. Eaton-Rye, B. C. Tripathy, & T. D. Sharkey (eds.); Springer, Vol. 34). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1579-0Sharma, A., Kumar, V., Shahzad, B., Ramakrishnan, M., Singh Sidhu, G. P., Bali, A. S., Handa, N., Kapoor, D., Yadav, P., Khanna, K., Bakshi, P., Rehman, A., Kohli, S. K., Khan, E. A., Parihar, R. D., Yuan, H., Thukral, A. K., Bhardwaj, R., & Zheng, B. (2020). Photosynthetic Response of Plants Under Different Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 39(2), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10018-xShi, Y., Ke, X., Yang, X., Liu, Y., & Hou, X. (2022). Plants response to light stress. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 49(8), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2022.04.017Shibamoto, T., Kato, Y., Sugiura, M., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Redox Potential of the Primary Plastoquinone Electron Acceptor Q A in Photosystem II from Thermosynechococcus elongatus Determined by Spectroelectrochemistry. Biochemistry, 48(45), 10682–10684. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901691jShimoda, S., & Sugikawa, Y. (2020). Grain‐filling response of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) to post‐anthesis shading in a humid climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 206(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12370Shrivastava, A. K., Pathak, A. D., Misra, V., Srivastava, S., Swapna, M., & Shukla, S. P. (2017). Sugarcane Crop: Its Tolerance Towards Abiotic Stresses. Abiotic Stress Management for Resilient Agriculture, 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1_17Shrivastava, A. K., Solomon, S., Rai, R. K., Singh, P., Chandra, A., Jain, R., & Shukla, S. P. (2015). Physiological Interventions for Enhancing Sugarcane and Sugar Productivity. Sugar Tech, 17(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0321-6Si, C., Yang, S., Lou, X., Zhang, G., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Effects of light spectrum on the morphophysiology and gene expression of lateral branching in Pepino (Solanum muricatum). Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 3739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1012086Slattery, R. A., Walker, B. J., Weber, A. P. M., & Ort, D. R. (2018). The Impacts of Fluctuating Light on Crop Performance. Plant Physiology, 176(2), 990–1003. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01234Smith, A. M., & Stitt, M. (2007). Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment, 30(9), 1126–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01708.xSom-ard, J., Atzberger, C., Izquierdo-Verdiguier, E., Vuolo, F., & Immitzer, M. (2021). Remote Sensing Applications in Sugarcane Cultivation: A Review. Remote Sensing, 13(20), 4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204040Sonkar, G., Singh, N., Mall, R. K., Singh, K. K., & Gupta, A. (2020). Simulating the Impacts of Climate Change on Sugarcane in Diverse Agro-climatic Zones of Northern India Using CANEGRO-Sugarcane Model. Sugar Tech, 22(3), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00787-wStinziano, J. R., Morgan, P. B., Lynch, D. J., Saathoff, A. J., McDermitt, D. K., & Hanson, D. T. (2017). The rapid A-C i response: photosynthesis in the phenomic era. Plant, Cell & Environment, 40(8), 1256–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12911Stirbet, A., Riznichenko, G. Y., Rubin, A. B., & Govindjee. (2014). Modeling chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: Relation to photosynthesis. Biochemistry (Moscow), 79(4), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297914040014Stirbet, Alexandrina, & Govindjee. (2011). On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and Photosystem II: Basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 104(1–2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.12.010Strasser, R.J., Srivastava, A., & Tsimilli-Michael, M. (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation & Adaptation, May 2014, 443–480. http://ww.hansatech-instruments.com/docs/the fluorescence transient.pdfStrasser, Reto J., Tsimilli-Michael, M., & Srivastava, A. (2004). Analysis of the Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Transient (pp. 321–362). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_12Swoczyna, T., Kalaji, H. M., Bussotti, F., Mojski, J., & Pollastrini, M. (2022). Environmental stress - what can we learn from chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis in woody plants? A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1048582Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (2014 Sinauer (ed.); 6th ed., Vol. 6).Takahashi, S., & Badger, M. R. (2011). Photoprotection in plants: a new light on photosystem II damage. Trends in Plant Science, 16(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.001Tanaka, Y., Adachi, S., & Yamori, W. (2019). Natural genetic variation of the photosynthetic induction response to fluctuating light environment. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 49, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.04.010Tang, Y., & Liesche, J. (2017). The molecular mechanism of shade avoidance in crops – How data from Arabidopsis can help to identify targets for increasing yield and biomass production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(6), 1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61434-XTaylor, S. H., & Long, S. P. (2017). Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1730), 20160543. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0543Tazoe, Y., Hanba, Y. T., Furumoto, T., Noguchi, K., & Terashima, I. (2008). Relationships Between Quantum Yield for CO2 Assimilation, Activity of Key Enzymes and CO2 Leakiness in Amaranthus cruentus, a C4 Dicot, Grown in High or Low Light. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm160Terentyev, V. V. (2022). Macromolecular conformational changes in photosystem II: interaction between structure and function. Biophysical Reviews, 14(4), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00979-xTsimilli-Michael, M. (2020). Special issue in honour of Prof. Reto J. Strasser - Revisiting JIP-test: An educative review on concepts, assumptions, approximations, definitions and terminology. Photosynthetica, 58(SPECIAL ISSUE), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.150Valladares, F., & Niinemets, Ü. (2008). Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506Valladares, F., & Niinemets, Ü. (2008). Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506van Heerden, P. D. R., Donaldson, R. A., Watt, D. A., & Singels, A. (2010). Biomass accumulation in sugarcane: unravelling the factors underpinning reduced growth phenomena. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(11), 2877–2887. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq144Vasantha, S., Arun Kumar, • R, Tayade, • A S, Krishnapriya, • V, Ram, • Bakshi, & Solomon, • S. (2021). Physiology of Sucrose Productivity and Implications of Ripeners in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 2021, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12355-021-01062-7Vasantha, S., Kumar, R. A., Tayade, A. S., Krishnapriya, V., Ram, B., & Solomon, S. (2022). Physiology of Sucrose Productivity and Implications of Ripeners in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 24(3), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01062-7Viola, S., Roseby, W., Santabarbara, S., Nürnberg, D., Assunção, R., Dau, H., Sellés, J., Boussac, A., Fantuzzi, A., & Rutherford, A. W. (2022). Impact of energy limitations on function and resilience in long-wavelength Photosystem II. ELife, 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79890von Caemmerer, S. (2000). Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. In Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643103405von Caemmerer, S., & Furbank, R. T. (2016). Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 31, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003von Caemmerer, Susanne, & Furbank, R. T. (2016). Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 31, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003von Caemmerer, Susanne. (2021). Updating the steady-state model of C4 photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(17), 6003–6017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab266Waheeda, K., Kitchel, H., Wang, Q., & Chiu, P.-L. (2023). Molecular mechanism of Rubisco activase: Dynamic assembly and Rubisco remodeling. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 10, 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1125922Wan, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Hong, A., Yang, H. Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Shade effects on growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of three Paeonia species. PeerJ, 2020(6). https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.9316/SUPP-3Wang, J., Nayak, S., Koch, K., & Ming, R. (2013). Carbon partitioning in sugarcane (Saccharum species). Frontiers in Plant Science, 4(JUN), 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00201Wang, Xiaoyan; Gao, Xinqiang; Liu, Yuling; Fan, Shuli; Ma, Q. (2020). Progress of Research on the Regulatory Pathway of the Plant Shade-Avoidance Syndrome. In Frontiers in Plant Science (Vol. 11, p. 495591). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00439Wang, Y., Chan, K. X., & Long, S. P. (2021). Towards a dynamic photosynthesis model to guide yield improvement in C4 crops. The Plant Journal, 107(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15365Wang, Y., Stutz, S. S., Bernacchi, C. J., Boyd, R. A., Ort, D. R., & Long, S. P. (2022). Increased bundle‐sheath leakiness of CO 2 during photosynthetic induction shows a lack of coordination between the C4 and C3 cycles. New Phytologist, 236(5), 1661–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18485Ward, D. A., & Woolhouse, H. W. (1986). Comparative effects of light during growth on the photosynthetic properties of NADP-ME type C4 grasses from open and shaded habitats. I. Gas exchange, leaf anatomy and ultrastructure. Plant, Cell and Environment, 9(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-3040.ep11611679Watson‐Lazowski, A., Papanicolaou, A., Koller, F., & Ghannoum, O. (2020). The transcriptomic responses of C 4 grasses to subambient CO 2 and low light are largely species specific and only refined by photosynthetic subtype. The Plant Journal, 101(5), 1170–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14583Wimalasekera, R. (2019). Effect of Light Intensity on Photosynthesis. In Photosynthesis, Productivity and Environmental Stress (pp. 65–73). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119501800.ch4Xia, H., Chen, K., Liu, L., Plenkovic-Moraj, A., Sun, G., & Lei, Y. (2022). Photosynthetic regulation in fluctuating light under combined stresses of high temperature and dehydration in three contrasting mosses. Plant Science, 323, 111379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111379Xie, F., Shi, Z., Zhang, G., Zhang, C., Sun, X., Yan, Y., Zhao, W., Guo, Z., Zhang, L., Fahad, S., Saud, S., & Chen, Y. (2020). Quantitative leaf anatomy and photophysiology systems of C3 and C4 turfgrasses in response to shading. Scientia Horticulturae, 274, 109674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109674Yamori, W. (2016). Photosynthetic response to fluctuating environments and photoprotective strategies under abiotic stress. Journal of Plant Research, 129(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-016-0816-1Yang, F., Huang, S., Gao, R., Liu, W., Yong, T., Wang, X., Wu, X., & Yang, W. (2014). Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crops Research, 155, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.011Yang, J., Li, C., Kong, D., Guo, F., & Wei, H. (2020). Light-Mediated Signaling and Metabolic Changes Coordinate Stomatal Opening and Closure. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601478Yao, X., Li, C., Li, S., Zhu, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Yu, C., St. Martin, S. K., & Xie, F. (2017). Effect of shade on leaf photosynthetic capacity, light-intercepting, electron transfer and energy distribution of soybeans. Plant Growth Regulation, 83(3), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0307-yYin, X., & Struik, P. C. (2018). The energy budget in C 4 photosynthesis: insights from a cell-type-specific electron transport model. New Phytologist, 218(3), 986–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15051Yin, X., Sun, Z., Struik, P. C., Van Der Putten, P. E. L., Van Ieperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2011). Using a biochemical C4 photosynthesis model and combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements to estimate bundle-sheath conductance of maize leaves differing in age and nitrogen content. Plant, Cell and Environment, 34(12), 2183–2199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02414.xYu, D., Zha, Y., Shi, L., Ye, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Improving sugarcane growth simulations by integrating multi-source observations into a crop model. European Journal of Agronomy, 132, 126410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126410Zahra, N., Al Hinai, M. S., Hafeez, M. B., Rehman, A., Wahid, A., Siddique, K. H. M., & Farooq, M. (2022). Regulation of photosynthesis under salt stress and associated tolerance mechanisms. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 178, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.003Zhang, H., Zhong, H., Wang, J., Sui, X., & Xu, N. (2016). Adaptive changes in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic features to low light in Physocarpus amurensis Maxim and Physocarpus opulifolius “Diabolo.” PeerJ, 4(6), e2125. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2125Zhao, D., & Li, Y.-R. (2015). Climate Change and Sugarcane Production: Potential Impact and Mitigation Strategies. International Journal of Agronomy, 2015(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386Zheng, L., & Van Labeke, M.-C. (2017). Chrysanthemum morphology, photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant capacity are differentially modified by light quality. Journal of Plant Physiology, 213, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.005Zhou, Q., Zhao, F., Zhang, H., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Responses of the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, endogenous hormones and antioxidant activity of Carpinus betulus L. seedlings to different light intensities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 4946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1055984Fisiología de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en respuesta a baja radiación en fase de maduración Aura Mercedes Cepeda Quevedo Universidad Nacional de Colombia Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Departamento de Ciencias Agrícolas Palmira, Colombia 2023Centro de investigación de la caña de azúcar (Cenicaña)BibliotecariosEstudiantesInvestigadoresMaestrosLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51ORIGINAL1144172713.2023.pdf1144172713.2023.pdfTesis Maestría en Ciencias Agrariasapplication/pdf3764826https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/3/1144172713.2023.pdfa3c5b7dc552f7e72c129946f81b888c7MD53THUMBNAIL1144172713.2023.pdf.jpg1144172713.2023.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4824https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/85339/4/1144172713.2023.pdf.jpg8d639a3fda5d2ea38f20c5f55290384dMD54unal/85339oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/853392024-08-20 23:10:48.57Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |