Early neoclassical views on monopoly

Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic...

Full description

Autores:
Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2009
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/2500
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/
Palabra clave:
33 Economía / Economics
Monopolio
A. Cournot
L. Walras
F. Y. Edgeworth
W. S. Jevons
Marginalistas
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
id UNACIONAL2_8ac151bc98b7d23e6990669e1038dabe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/2500
network_acronym_str UNACIONAL2
network_name_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
spelling Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés2535ed1c-0177-4f4b-838f-1d27c0fe33c23002019-06-24T12:45:21Z2019-06-24T12:45:21Z2009ISSN: 2011-6322https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic theory. Even if it is a theoretical one it has normative consequence. From these it is derived a negative appreciation on Monopoly. The second is a more pragmatic point of view. Whereas the former is purely theoretical the latter is derived from multiple examples and it cannot be based on the same theoretical framework as the well known theory of monopoly prices. From this pragmatic point of view, Cournot constructs some “positive” appreciations on the existence of monopolies. These two different appreciations on imperfect markets have influenced in different ways the works of the authors of the Marginal Revolution. Following this distinction we study the different points of view of Walras, Edgeworth and Marshall on Monopoly. We show that even if Walras‟s theory of Monopoly does not have the same theoretical foundations of Cournot‟s, his normative point of view on monopolies is closely related with the “purely theoretical” conclusions. Walras frequently quoted Cournot on these matters. Edgeworth and Marshall have a different point of view on Monopoly, mainly pragmatic and sometimes quite positive from the normative point of view. However Walras‟s as well as Edgeworth‟s and Marshall‟s theories on monopoly are not based on their theories of perfect competition. We conclude that the marginlists views on imperfect competition are not constructed as a “perturbation” or a “friction” of a perfectly competitive market.application/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Escuela de EconomíaEscuela de EconomíaAlvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés (2009) Early neoclassical views on monopoly. Documentos FCE (10). pp. 1-19. ISSN 2011-632233 Economía / EconomicsMonopolioA. CournotL. WalrasF. Y. EdgeworthW. S. JevonsMarginalistasEarly neoclassical views on monopolyArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTORIGINALdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdfapplication/pdf407416https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/1/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf49c529077c2f74b92319bcb13210585cMD51THUMBNAILdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpgdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4698https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/2/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpg74051e010aa001c9ffbdc83ba5c45c82MD52unal/2500oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/25002023-08-19 23:04:39.554Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Early neoclassical views on monopoly
title Early neoclassical views on monopoly
spellingShingle Early neoclassical views on monopoly
33 Economía / Economics
Monopolio
A. Cournot
L. Walras
F. Y. Edgeworth
W. S. Jevons
Marginalistas
title_short Early neoclassical views on monopoly
title_full Early neoclassical views on monopoly
title_fullStr Early neoclassical views on monopoly
title_full_unstemmed Early neoclassical views on monopoly
title_sort Early neoclassical views on monopoly
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv 33 Economía / Economics
topic 33 Economía / Economics
Monopolio
A. Cournot
L. Walras
F. Y. Edgeworth
W. S. Jevons
Marginalistas
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Monopolio
A. Cournot
L. Walras
F. Y. Edgeworth
W. S. Jevons
Marginalistas
description Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic theory. Even if it is a theoretical one it has normative consequence. From these it is derived a negative appreciation on Monopoly. The second is a more pragmatic point of view. Whereas the former is purely theoretical the latter is derived from multiple examples and it cannot be based on the same theoretical framework as the well known theory of monopoly prices. From this pragmatic point of view, Cournot constructs some “positive” appreciations on the existence of monopolies. These two different appreciations on imperfect markets have influenced in different ways the works of the authors of the Marginal Revolution. Following this distinction we study the different points of view of Walras, Edgeworth and Marshall on Monopoly. We show that even if Walras‟s theory of Monopoly does not have the same theoretical foundations of Cournot‟s, his normative point of view on monopolies is closely related with the “purely theoretical” conclusions. Walras frequently quoted Cournot on these matters. Edgeworth and Marshall have a different point of view on Monopoly, mainly pragmatic and sometimes quite positive from the normative point of view. However Walras‟s as well as Edgeworth‟s and Marshall‟s theories on monopoly are not based on their theories of perfect competition. We conclude that the marginlists views on imperfect competition are not constructed as a “perturbation” or a “friction” of a perfectly competitive market.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2009
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-24T12:45:21Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-24T12:45:21Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv ISSN: 2011-6322
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500
dc.identifier.eprints.spa.fl_str_mv http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 2011-6322
url https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Escuela de Economía
Escuela de Economía
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés (2009) Early neoclassical views on monopoly. Documentos FCE (10). pp. 1-19. ISSN 2011-6322
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/1/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/2/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 49c529077c2f74b92319bcb13210585c
74051e010aa001c9ffbdc83ba5c45c82
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_ 1814090117624627200