Early neoclassical views on monopoly
Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic...
- Autores:
-
Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/2500
- Palabra clave:
- 33 Economía / Economics
Monopolio
A. Cournot
L. Walras
F. Y. Edgeworth
W. S. Jevons
Marginalistas
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
id |
UNACIONAL2_8ac151bc98b7d23e6990669e1038dabe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/2500 |
network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés2535ed1c-0177-4f4b-838f-1d27c0fe33c23002019-06-24T12:45:21Z2019-06-24T12:45:21Z2009ISSN: 2011-6322https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic theory. Even if it is a theoretical one it has normative consequence. From these it is derived a negative appreciation on Monopoly. The second is a more pragmatic point of view. Whereas the former is purely theoretical the latter is derived from multiple examples and it cannot be based on the same theoretical framework as the well known theory of monopoly prices. From this pragmatic point of view, Cournot constructs some “positive” appreciations on the existence of monopolies. These two different appreciations on imperfect markets have influenced in different ways the works of the authors of the Marginal Revolution. Following this distinction we study the different points of view of Walras, Edgeworth and Marshall on Monopoly. We show that even if Walras‟s theory of Monopoly does not have the same theoretical foundations of Cournot‟s, his normative point of view on monopolies is closely related with the “purely theoretical” conclusions. Walras frequently quoted Cournot on these matters. Edgeworth and Marshall have a different point of view on Monopoly, mainly pragmatic and sometimes quite positive from the normative point of view. However Walras‟s as well as Edgeworth‟s and Marshall‟s theories on monopoly are not based on their theories of perfect competition. We conclude that the marginlists views on imperfect competition are not constructed as a “perturbation” or a “friction” of a perfectly competitive market.application/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Escuela de EconomíaEscuela de EconomíaAlvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés (2009) Early neoclassical views on monopoly. Documentos FCE (10). pp. 1-19. ISSN 2011-632233 Economía / EconomicsMonopolioA. CournotL. WalrasF. Y. EdgeworthW. S. JevonsMarginalistasEarly neoclassical views on monopolyArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTORIGINALdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdfapplication/pdf407416https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/1/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf49c529077c2f74b92319bcb13210585cMD51THUMBNAILdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpgdocalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4698https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/2/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpg74051e010aa001c9ffbdc83ba5c45c82MD52unal/2500oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/25002023-08-19 23:04:39.554Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
title |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
spellingShingle |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly 33 Economía / Economics Monopolio A. Cournot L. Walras F. Y. Edgeworth W. S. Jevons Marginalistas |
title_short |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
title_full |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
title_fullStr |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
title_full_unstemmed |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
title_sort |
Early neoclassical views on monopoly |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés |
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
33 Economía / Economics |
topic |
33 Economía / Economics Monopolio A. Cournot L. Walras F. Y. Edgeworth W. S. Jevons Marginalistas |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Monopolio A. Cournot L. Walras F. Y. Edgeworth W. S. Jevons Marginalistas |
description |
Abstract. This paper analyses how Cournot‟s views on Monopoly have influenced the marginalists authors. It is argued that there are two different points of view in the cournotian evaluation of the consequence of Monopoly. The first one is a purely theoretical construction adopted in modern economic theory. Even if it is a theoretical one it has normative consequence. From these it is derived a negative appreciation on Monopoly. The second is a more pragmatic point of view. Whereas the former is purely theoretical the latter is derived from multiple examples and it cannot be based on the same theoretical framework as the well known theory of monopoly prices. From this pragmatic point of view, Cournot constructs some “positive” appreciations on the existence of monopolies. These two different appreciations on imperfect markets have influenced in different ways the works of the authors of the Marginal Revolution. Following this distinction we study the different points of view of Walras, Edgeworth and Marshall on Monopoly. We show that even if Walras‟s theory of Monopoly does not have the same theoretical foundations of Cournot‟s, his normative point of view on monopolies is closely related with the “purely theoretical” conclusions. Walras frequently quoted Cournot on these matters. Edgeworth and Marshall have a different point of view on Monopoly, mainly pragmatic and sometimes quite positive from the normative point of view. However Walras‟s as well as Edgeworth‟s and Marshall‟s theories on monopoly are not based on their theories of perfect competition. We conclude that the marginlists views on imperfect competition are not constructed as a “perturbation” or a “friction” of a perfectly competitive market. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-24T12:45:21Z |
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-24T12:45:21Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 2011-6322 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500 |
dc.identifier.eprints.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/ |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 2011-6322 |
url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2500 http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/764/ |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Escuela de Economía Escuela de Economía |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alvarez Gallo, Carlos Andrés (2009) Early neoclassical views on monopoly. Documentos FCE (10). pp. 1-19. ISSN 2011-6322 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/1/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/2500/2/docalvarez_fce__ee_10.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
49c529077c2f74b92319bcb13210585c 74051e010aa001c9ffbdc83ba5c45c82 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814090117624627200 |