Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.

Ilustraciones

Autores:: Vargas Betancur, Cristina

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Repositorio:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Idioma:

id	UNACIONAL2_7af1ca8c3acab3f98820ef001119e55a
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/80453
network_acronym_str	UNACIONAL2
network_name_str	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Agroecosystems dynamics under the socioecological system approach. Case study : Río Grande y Río Chico watershed.
title	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
spellingShingle	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico. 330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía Ecología agrícola Agroecosistemas Agricultural ecology Agricultural biotic communities Cuenca Hidrográfica Río Grande Sistemas socio ecológicos Agroecosistemas Dinámica de sistemas Dinámica de sistemas Socioecological systems Agroecosystems System dynamics Causal loops Decision making
title_short	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
title_full	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
title_fullStr	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
title_full_unstemmed	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
title_sort	Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Vargas Betancur, Cristina
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Villegas Palacio, Clara Ines Osorio Múnera, Juan David
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Vargas Betancur, Cristina
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv	330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía
topic	330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía Ecología agrícola Agroecosistemas Agricultural ecology Agricultural biotic communities Cuenca Hidrográfica Río Grande Sistemas socio ecológicos Agroecosistemas Dinámica de sistemas Dinámica de sistemas Socioecological systems Agroecosystems System dynamics Causal loops Decision making
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv	Ecología agrícola Agroecosistemas
dc.subject.lemb.eng.fl_str_mv	Agricultural ecology Agricultural biotic communities
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Cuenca Hidrográfica Río Grande Sistemas socio ecológicos Agroecosistemas Dinámica de sistemas Dinámica de sistemas
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	Socioecological systems Agroecosystems System dynamics Causal loops Decision making
description	Ilustraciones
publishDate	2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2020-12-18
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-10-08T19:21:23Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-10-08T19:21:23Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80453
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80453 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Acevedo, M., Rosales, J., Delgado, L., Ablan, M., Davila, J., Callicot, J. B., et al. (2007). Modelos de interacción humano-ambiental: el enfoque de la Biocomplejidad. Revista Ecosistemas, 16(3), 56–68. http://www.revistaecosistemas.net/index.php/ecosistemas/article/view/93 Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacityy. Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., & Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1251 Alhameid, A., Ibrahim, M., Kumar, S., Sexton, P., & Schumacher, T. E. (2017). Soil organic carbon changes impacted by crop rotational diversity under no-till farming in South Dakota, USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 868–877. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0121 Altieri, M. (2015). Agroecología : principios y estrategias para diseñar sistemas agrarios sustentables (Issue June). Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74(1–3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6 Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2 Altieri, M., & Nicholls, C. I. (2013). Agroecología y resiliencia al cambio climatico. Agroecología, 8(1), 7–20. file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/182921-Texto del artículo-664981-1-10-20130923 (1).pdf Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), art18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00610-090118 Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004). The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(6), 1945–1962. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 Banco Mundial. (2018). Colombia Nota de Política sobre la Implementación del Seguro Agrícola Catastrófico. Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Espinosa-Goded, M., & Dupraz, P. (2010). Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(7), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.490058 Barton, C. M., Ullah, I. I., & Bergin, S. (2010). Land use, water and Mediterranean landscapes: Modelling long-term dynamics of complex socio-ecological systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1931), 5275–5297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0193 Beare, M. H., Parmelee, R. W., Hendrix, P. F., Cheng, W., Coleman, D. C., & Crossley, D. A. (1992). Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937317 Belcher, K. W., Boehm, M. M., & Fulton, M. E. (2004). Agroecosystem sustainability: A system simulation model approach. Agricultural Systems, 79(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00072-6 BERGEVOET, R. H. M. (2011). Entrepreneurship of Dutch dairy farmers. Bergez, J. E., Debaeke, P., Deumier, J. M., Lacroix, B., Leenhardt, D., Leroy, P., et al. (2001). MODERATO: An object-oriented decision tool for designing maize irrigation schedules. Ecological Modelling, 137(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00431-2 Berrio Giraldo, L., Villegas Palacio, C., & Arango Aramburo, S. (2019). MODELACIÓN DINÁMICA DE SISTEMAS SOCIO-ECOLÓGICOS. ANALISIS DE LA DINÁMICA EN EL CAMBIO DE COBERTURA DEL SUELO EN CUENCAS ESTRATEGICAS. Berrouet, Lina Maria. (2018). Vulnerabilidad de sistemas sociales frente a la modificación de servicios ecosistémicos en cuencas hidrográficas de media montaña. Berrouet, Lina María, Machado, J., & Villegas-Palacio, C. (2018). Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecological Indicators, 84(February 2017), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051 Biggs, R., Schluter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., Burnsilver, S., Cundill, G., et al. (2012). Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836 Blanco, C., & Carlos, J. (1982). Procedimiento para hacer un eje o un friso cronológico. 4–6. Blanco, J. (2008). Integrated Water Resource Management in Colombia : Paralysis by Analysis? International Journal of Water Resources, March 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701747686 Böhme, L., Langer, U., & Böhme, F. (2005). Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 109(1–2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.017 Bolaños Valencia, I. V. (2017). Percepción social del riesgo por pérdida de servicios ecosistémicos - caso de estudio cuenca de los ríos grande y chico, antioquia. 151. http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/61270/ Booth, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics : initial results of a systems thinking inventory. 16(4), 249–286. Booth, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics : initial results of a systems thinking inventory. 16(4), 249–286. Brenner, J., Jiménez, J. A., Sardá, R., & Garola, A. (2010). An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.10.008 Bulatkin, G. A. (2012). Analysis of energy flows in agroecosystems. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 82(4), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331612040089 Burton, R. J. F., & Wilson, G. A. (2006). Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.004 Cabel, J. F., & Oelofse, M. (2012). An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118 Calderón, A., García, F., & Martinez, G. (2006). Indicators of Raw Milk Quality in Different Regions of Colombia. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 11(1), 725–737. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2015a). Manual de la Papa. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2015b). Manual de Tomate de árbol. https://www.ccb.org.co/content/download/13726/175108/file/Tomate de árbol.pdf Cardona, H., & Estefany, P. R. (2018). Análisis de redes sociales para la gobernanza del agua: caso cuenca Río Grande, Norte de Antioquia. 1–43. Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Diaz, S., et al. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106 Carulla Fornaguera, J., & Ortega García, E. (2016). Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: retos y oportunidades. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 24(2), 83–87. Caso, E. L., & Módulo, D. E. L. (2008). Condiciones ambientales y producción de leche de un hato de ganado jersey en el trópico húmedo: el caso del Módulo Lechero-SDA/UCR. Agronomia Costarricense, 32(1), 87–94. Castaño Giraldo, N. E., & Cardona Gómez, M. A. (2014). Factores determinantes en la inestabilidad del sector agrícola colombiano. En Contexto, 2, 91–107. Chapin, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World (Issue May 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2 Chatelin, M. H., Aubry, C., Poussin, J. C., Meynard, J. M., Massé, J., Verjux, N., et al. (2005). DéciBlé, a software package for wheat crop management simulation. Agricultural Systems, 83(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.03.003 Cleves, A. (2018). Resiliencia de agroecosistemas citrícolas a la variabilidad climática en el Departamento del Meta , Colombia. Clouaire, R. M., & Rellier, J. P. (2009). Modelling and simulating work practices in agriculture. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 4(1/2), 42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.026253 COLANTA. (2012). Manual para producir leche de calidad. Collins, S. L., Carpenter, S. R., Swinton, S. M., Orenstein, D. E., Childers, D. L., Gragson, T. L., et al. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(6), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1890/100068 Corantioquia. (2017). INFORME DE AVANCE DE LA EJECUCIÓN DEL PLAN DE ACCIÓN “ POR EL PATRIMONIO AMBIENTAL DE NUESTRO TERRITORIO .” CORANTIOQUIA. (2015a). Caracterización Biofísica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico. CORANTIOQUIA. (2015b). Caracterización Socioeconómica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico. CORANTIOQUIA. (2015b). Caracterización Socioeconómica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico. Corantioquia, & Alcadia de Santa Rosa de Osos. (2015). Consolidación de iniciativas de conservación en el municipio de santa rosa de osos - antioquia. 134. CORANTIOQUIA, & Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2015). Actualización y Ajuste Plan de Ordenación y Manejo de la Cuenca de los Ríos Grande y Chico. Cros, M., Duru, M., Garcia, F., & Martin-clouaire, R. (2001). Simulating rotational grazing management. 27, 139–145. Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., et al. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 8(8), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z DANE. (2016). Efectos del clima en la producción de la ganadería de leche. Boletín Mensual INSUMOS Y FACTORES ASOCIADOS A LA PRODUCCIÓN AGROPECUARIA, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001452 Darghouth, S., Ward, C., Gambarelli, G., Styger, E., & Roux, J. (2008). Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: Lessons for scaling up. Water Sector Board Discussion Papers, 11, 1–164. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/05/9608907/watershed-management-approaches-policies-operations-lessons-scaling-up%5Cnhttp://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/06/26/000020439_20080626162646/Rendered/PDF/442 Dávila Betancurth, J. C. (2016). Variables Explicativas de la Vulnerabilidad Biofísica y Socio Económica al Cambio Climático en Agroecosistemas de la Cuenca del Rio Grande Antioquia. Dávila, J. C., & Vélez, L. D. (2015). Vulnerabilidad ecológica y económica de sistemas especializados en producción de leche en la Cuenca del Riogrande – Colombia. Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroecología, 1–5. De Aranzabal, I., Schmitz, M. F., Aguilera, P., & Pineda, F. D. (2008). Modelling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecological systems. A case of study in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Indicators, 8(5), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.11.003 De los Ríos Cardona, J. C. (2015). VULNERABILIDADE DA AGRICULTURA ÀS MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS NA BACIA DO RIO GRANDE (ANTIOQUIA, COLÔMBIA): UMA ABORDAGEM A PARTIR DO TERRITÓRIO E DA RESILIÊNCIA DOS SISTEMAS SOCIO-ECOLÓGICOS. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886 Dee, L. E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S. D., Hines, J., et al. (2017). Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011 Denisov, V. V. (2001). Development of the crop simulation system DIASPORA. Agronomy Journal, 93(3), 660–666. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.933660x Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2017). Documento Conpes 3886. Lineamientos de política y programa nacional de pago por servicios ambientales para la construcción de paz. Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, 94. Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., & Reed, M. S. (2010). Anticipating Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Pastoral Systems: Using Dynamic Systems Models for the Kalahari. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art17/ Dourojeanni, A., Jouravlev, A., & Chávez, G. (2002). Gestión del agua a nivel de cuencas. teoría y práctica. In United Nations Publications (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/1680-9025 Duque, G., & Escobar, C. (2012). Consolidación de suelos. Mecanica de Los Suelos, 80–109. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/1864/10/cap9.pdf Eivazi, F., Bayan, M. R., & Schmidt, K. (2003). Select soil enzyme activities in the historic Sanborn Field as affected by long-term cropping systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34(15–16), 2259–2275. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120024062 Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Filatova, T., Rook, J., & Jakeman, A. J. (2015). A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: From cognitive maps to agent-based models. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.028 Emmerling, C., Schloter, M., Hartmann, A., & Kandeler, E. (2002). Functional diversity of soil organisms - A review of recent research activities in Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408::AID-JPLN408>3.0.CO;2-3 Emmerling, C., Schloter, M., Hartmann, A., & Kandeler, E. (2002). Functional diversity of soil organisms - A review of recent research activities in Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408::AID-JPLN408>3.0.CO;2-3 FAO. (2007). Adaptation to climate change in agriculture , forestry and fisheries : Perspective , framework and. Interdepartmental Working Group on Climate Change, 32pp. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/j9271e/j9271e.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.fao.org/NR/climpag/index_fr.asp FAO. (2017). Seguros agrícolas para la agricultura familiar en américa latina y el caribe. Lineamientos para su diseño e implementación. http://www.draplvt.mamaot.pt/DRAPLVT/Comunicacao/Noticias/Documents/seminario_Agricultura_rio_maior_2017/2_Seguros_agricolas_CA Seguros.pdf Farm, N., Farm, N., Stewardship, C., Entry, O., Stewardship, L., & Government, U. K. (2012). Materials and Methods . Part 1 . Details of the study site Part 2 . Constructing the interaction networks. Science. Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Dahe, Q., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., et al. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. In Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245 Fierer, N., Strickland, M. S., Liptzin, D., Bradford, M. A., & Cleveland, C. C. (2009). Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecology Letters, 12(11), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01360.x Fischer, C., Leydesdorff, L., Schophaus, M., Dorland, J., Jørgensen, M. S., Chan, L., et al. (2010). The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. In Social Studies of Science (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. In Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 30). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 Fondevilla, C., Àngels Colomer, M., Fillat, F., & Tappeiner, U. (2016). Using a new PDP modelling approach for land-use and land-cover change predictions: A case study in the Stubai Valley (Central Alps). Ecological Modelling, 322(February), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.016 Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3(C), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80001-X Francis, C. (2010). Book review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.R9013 Franko, U., & Wilfried, M. (2001). Integration of a Crop Growth Model with a Model of Soil Dynamics. 93(June), 666–670. Galarza, F. B. (2009). Choices under Risk in Rural Peru. 17708. Gallopin Gilverto. (2013). Sostenibilidad y desarrollo Sostenible: un enfoque sistémico. In nsabilidad del autor y pueden no coincidir con las de la Organización. PPublicación de las Naciones Unidas : Vol. S.02.II.G. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 García-Leoz, V., Villegas, J. C., Suescún, D., Flórez, C. P., Merino-Martín, L., Betancur, T., et al. (2018). Land cover effects on water balance partitioning in the Colombian Andes: improved water availability in early stages of natural vegetation recovery. Regional Environmental Change, 18(4), 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1249-7 Gasson, R. (1973). And farmers. Jornal of Agricultural Economics, 24(3), 521–542. Gaviria, B. C. (2007). Calidad higiénica y sanitaria de la leche cruda. In Fondo Editorial Biogénesis (pp. 115–122). Geilfus, F. (2005). 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: Diagnóstico, Planificación Monitoreo y Evaluación. Gerber, P., Chilonda, P., Franceschini, G., & Menzi, H. (2005). Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. Bioresource Technology, 96(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.016 Gerzabek, M. H., Antil, R. S., Kögel-Knabner, I., Knicker, H., Kirchmann, H., & Haberhauer, G. (2006). How are soil use and management reflected by soil organic matter characteristics: A spectroscopic approach. European Journal of Soil Science, 57(4), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00794.x Giorgio Castellaro, G., Klee, G., & Chavarria R., J. (2007). Un modelo de simulación de sistemas de engorda de bovinos a pastoreo. Agricultura Técnica, 67(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0365-28072007000200006 Gormley, L. H. L., & Sinclair, F. L. (2003). Modelaje participativo del impacto de los árboles en la productividad de las fincas y la biodiversidad regional en paisajes fragmentados en América Central. Agroforestería En Las Américas, 10, 103–108. Greiner, R. (2015). Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems, 137, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.005 Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Hardner, J., & Rice, R. (2002). Rethinking Green Consumerism. Scientific American, 89–95. Hazell, P. et al. (2010). El potencial para la ampliación y sostenibilidad de los seguros basados en índices climáticos para la agricultura y subsistencia rural. 151. Hirji, R., & Davis, R. (2009). Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects. Water Resources, 117, 181. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7940-0 Holmann, F., & Rica, C. (2002). El uso de modelos de simulación como herramienta para la toma de decisiones en la promoción de nuevas alternativas forrajeras: el caso de Costa Rica y Perú* Using simulation models as a tool for promoting improved forages alternatives in. Latinoam. Prod. Anim, 10(1), 35–45. Hördur V. Haraldsson. (2004). Introduction to System Thinking and Causal Loop Diagrams. In Reports in Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Issue January 2004). Hynes, S., & Garvey, E. (2009). Modelling farmers’ participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: An application to the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00210.x Ifejika Speranza, C., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social – ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 28, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005 Ingram, J., Gaskell, P., Mills, J., & Short, C. (2013). Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations. Land Use Policy, 31, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.007 Jairo, Á. P. J. (2013). EVALUACIÓN DEL IMPACTO DEL MICROCRÉDITO EN LA COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO COLANTA. Janssen, M. A., Bodin, Ö., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R., et al. (2006). Toward a Network Perspective of the Study of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/15 Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Chapter 30 Governing Social-Ecological Systems. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2(05), 1465–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02030-7 Jaramillo Londoño, A. R., & Areiza Segura, A. M. (2012). Análisis del Mercado de la Leche y Derivados Lácteos en Colombia (2008 – 2012). Kandeler, E., Stemmer, M., & Klimanek, E. M. (1999). Response of soil microbial biomass, urease and xylanase within particle size fractions to long-term soil management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00115-1 Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cline, R.G., Harris, R.F., Schuman, G.E., et al. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61. http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/16713 Kinoshita, R., Schindelbeck, R. R., & van Es, H. M. (2017). Quantitative soil profile-scale assessment of the sustainability of long-term maize residue and tillage management. Soil and Tillage Research, 174(May), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.05.010 Kronberg, S. L., & Ryschawy, J. (2018). Integration of crop and livestock production in temperate regions to improve agroecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and human nutrition and health. In Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00015-7 ucharik, C. J. (2003). Evaluation of a process-based agro-ecosystem model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. Corn Belt: Simulations of the interannual variability in maize yield. Earth Interactions, 7(14), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1175/1087-3562(2003)007<0001:EOAPAM>2.0.CO;2 Kumar, A., Dorodnikov, M., Splettstößer, T., Kuzyakov, Y., & Pausch, J. (2017). Effects of maize roots on aggregate stability and enzyme activities in soil. Geoderma, 306(October 2016), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.007 Kurukulasuriya, P., & Rosenthal, S. (2003). Climate change and agriculture. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90186-2 Lacitignola, D., Petrosillo, I., Cataldi, M., & Zurlini, G. (2007). Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability. Ecological Modelling, 206(1–2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.034 Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(5), 5875–5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875 Lastra-Bravo, X. B., Hubbard, C., Garrod, G., & Tolón-Becerra, A. (2015). What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis. Environmental Science and Policy, 54, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002 Lobell, D. B., & Gourdji, S. M. (2012). The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiology, 160(4), 1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208298 Lu, M., Zhou, X., Luo, Y., Yang, Y., Fang, C., Chen, J., et al. (2011). Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140(1–2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.010 Machado, J., Villegas-Palacio, C., Loaiza, J. C., & Castañeda, D. A. (2019). Soil natural capital vulnerability to environmental change. A regional scale approach for tropical soils in the Colombian Andes. Ecological Indicators, 96(65), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.060 Machado Vargas, M. M., Nicholls, C. I., Márquez, S. M., & Turbay, S. (2015). Caracterización de nueve agroecosistemas de café de la cuenca del río Porce, Colombia, con un enfoque agroecológico. Idesia (Arica), 33(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34292015000100008 MADS. (2018). Decreto 1007 de 2018. 1–10. Marinari, S., Masciandaro, G., Ceccanti, B., & Grego, S. (2000). Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresource Technology, 72(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00094-2 Marinari, Sara, Mancinelli, R., Campiglia, E., & Grego, S. (2006). Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy. Ecological Indicators, 6(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.029 Marsiglia Rivera, S. M. (2017). Capacidad adaptativa de los sistemas sociales ante la pérdida o deterioro de los servicios ecosistémicos. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Montes, C. (2009). Un marco conceptual para la gestión de las interacciones naturaleza-sociedad en un mundo cambiante. Cuides. Cuaderno Interdisciplinar de Desarrollo Sostenible, 3, 229–258. Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Rellier, J. P., & Duru, M. (2011). A simulation framework for the design of grassland-based beef-cattle farms. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.002 Martínez, I., Chervet, A., Weisskopf, P., Sturny, W. G., Rek, J., & Keller, T. (2016). Two decades of no-till in the Oberacker long-term field experiment: Part II. Soil porosity and gas transport parameters. Soil and Tillage Research, 163, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.05.020 Martínez, J., & Esteve, M. (2007). Gestión integrada de cuencas costeras : dinámica de los nutrientes en la cuenca del Mar Menor (sudeste de España). Revista de Dinámica de Sistemas, 3(Marzo), 2–23. Mauricio, R. M., Ribeiro, R. S., Paciullo, D. S. C., Cangussú, M. A., Murgueitio, E., Chará, J., et al. (2018). Silvopastoral systems in latin america for biodiversity, environmental, and socioeconomic improvements. Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00018-2 Mbizvo, C., Duraiappah, A., Koetz, T., Brondizio, E., Bartus, G., Roué, M., et al. (2014). The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 Melland, A. R., Antille, D. L., & Dang, Y. P. (2017). Effects of strategic tillage on short-Term erosion, nutrient loss in runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Research, 55(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16136 Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., & Jakeman, A. J. (2003). A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 18(8–9), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1 Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2010). Balance de Gobierno Logros y Retos del Sector Agropecuario. Ministerio de agricultura y desarrollo rural MADR. (2012). Resolución 000017 de 2012 (p. 18). Ministerio de la Protección Social. (2006). Decreto Número 616 De 2006. Ministerio de La Protección Social, 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1937.tb03385.x Montealegre Bocanegra, J. (2014). Actualización del componente Meteorológico del modelo institucional del IDEAM sobre el efecto climático de los fenómenos El Niño y La Niña en Colombia, como insumo para el Atlas Climatológico. IDEAM (Instituto de Hidrologia, Meteorologia y Estudios Ambientales), 1–134. http://www.ideam.gov.co/documents/21021/440517/Actualizacion+Modelo+Institucional+El+Niño+-+La+Niña.pdf/02f5e53b-0349-41f1-87e0-5513286d1d1d Murgueitio, E. R., Chará, J. O., Barahona, R. R., Cuartas, C. C., & Naranjo, J. R. (2014). Intensive Silvopastoral Systems (ISPS), mitigation and adaptation tool to climate change. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 17(3), 501–507. Murphy, G., Hynes, S., Murphy, E., & O’Donoghue, C. (2014). An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness. Land Use Policy, 39, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.015 Nunes, M. R., van Es, H. M., Schindelbeck, R., Ristow, A. J., & Ryan, M. (2018). No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield. Geoderma, 328(April), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.031 Orduño Torres, M. A., Kallas, Z., & Ornelas Herrera, S. I. (2018). Analysis of Farmers ’ Stated Risk Using Lotteries and Their Perceptions of Climate Change in the Northwest of Mexico. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9010004 Osorio Múnera, J. D., García-tavera, L. M., Bustamante Ochoa, E. A., & Uribe Rivera, N. (2019). Optimización de uso del suelo acorde con restricciones ambientales y sociales: caso cuenca de Riogrande II. Semestre Económico, 22(52), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v22n52a2 Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Cees, G., Muhammad, H., Enrique, I., El, M., et al. (2004). Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes. ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT PAPER, 96. Pahl-wostl, C. (2002). Towards sustainability in the water sector – The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. 64, 394–411. Pannell, D. J. (1995). Economic aspects of legume management and legume research in dryland farming systems of southern Australia. Agricultural Systems, 49(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(94)00049-W Panpakdee, C., & Limnirankul, B. (2017). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Indicators for assessing social-ecological resilience : A case study of organic rice production in northern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.003 Pérez-Maqueo, O., Delfín, C., Fregoso, A., Cotler, H., & Equihua, M. (2005). Modelos de simulación para la elaboración y evaluación de los programas de servicios ambientales hídricos. Gaceta Ecológica, 76, 47–66. Pérez Gallardo, S. J. (2001). MODELO PARA EVALUAR LA EROSION HIDRICA EN COLOMBIA UTILIZANDO SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION GEOGRAFICA. Pimentel, D., & Burgess, M. (2005). An environmental, energetic and economic comparison of organic and conventional farming systems. Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems, Vol.3, 55(7), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7796-5_6 Pomar, C., Harris, D. L., Savoie, P., & Minvielle, F. (1991). Computer simulation model of swine production systems: III. A dynamic herd simulation model including reproduction. Journal of Animal Science, 69(7), 2822–2836. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6972822x Quesnel, G., Akplogan, M., Bonneau, M., Martin-Clouaire, R., Peyrard, N., Rellier, J. P., et al. (2015). Decision in agroecosystems advanced modelling techniques studying global changes in environmental sciences. Developments in Environmental Modelling, 27, 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63536-5.00010-7 Ram, C. D., & Orrego, S. A. (2015). Trayectorias de cambios en coberturas terrestres en una cuenca de los Andes colombianos: Río Grande, 1986-2012. 4. Ramirez Guerra, S. (2018). Retrospectiva del sector lácteo colombiano. Ramírez León, J. M. (2009). Producción de sedimentos en cuencas: revisión de criterios y aplicabilidad a la cuenca del río Apulco. June 2009, 205. Rapidel, B., Ripoche, A., Allinne, C., Metay, A., Deheuvels, O., Lamanda, N., et al. (2015). Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0317-y Raskin, P. D. (2006). World Lines : Pathways , Pivots , and the Global Future. Reicosky, D. C., Sauer, T. J., & Hatfi, J. L. (2011). Productivity and Environmental Quality : Tillage Impacts. 56267, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.2136/2011soilmanagement.c2 Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G. S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A. P., & Polasky, S. (2013). Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1890/120144 Ríos, M. (2010). Control biológico de la Antracnosis (Colletotrichum gloesporioides Penz) en tomate de árbol (Solanum betaceum) en el ecotipo: amarillo puntón, mediante hongos endofitos antagonistas. Rodriguez-Iturb, I. (2000). Ecohydrology : A hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 3–9. Rotz, C. A., Buckmaster, D. R., & Comerford, J. W. (2005). A beef herd model for simulating feed intake , animal performance , and manure excretion in farm systems The online version of this article , along with updated information and services , is located on the World Wide Web at : A beef herd model for simulat. Journal of Animal Science, 83(June 2014), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74032-6 Ruiz-Cortés, T., Orozco, S., Rodríguez, L., Idárraga, J., & Olivera, M. (2012). Factores Que Afectan El Recuento De Ufc En La Leche En Tanque En Hatos Lecheros Del Norte De Antioquia-Colombia. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, m, 147–155. Scanlon, B. R., Gates, J. B., Reedy, R. C., Jackson, W. A., & Bordovsky, J. P. (2010). Effects of irrigated agroecosystems: 2. Quality of soil water and groundwater in the southern High Plains, Texas. Water Resources Research, 46(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008428 Schulte, R. P. O., Creamer, R. E., Donnellan, T., Farrelly, N., Fealy, R., O’Donoghue, C., et al. (2014). Functional land management: A framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Environmental Science and Policy, 38, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.002 Secretaría Jurídica de Bogotá. (2002). Decerto 1729 de 2002. Sepúlveda López, L. P. (2013). Modelo para la definición de áreas estratégicas para la conservación de suelos a partir de la determinación de la susceptibilidad a la erosión hídirica. Serrato, B., Díaz, R., & Bermúdez, L. (1999). ÓPTIMO DE COBERTURA VEGETAL EN RELACIÓN A LAS PÉRDIDAS DE SUELO POR EROSIÓN HÍDRICA Y LAS PÉRDIDAS DE LLUVIA POR INTERCEPTACIÓN. January. Shi, T., & Gill, R. (2005). Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: The case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model. Ecological Economics, 53(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.006 Siebert, R., Toogood, M., & Knierim, A. (2006). Factors affecting european farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x Soussana, J. F., & Lemaire, G. (2014). Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 190, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.012 Spicer, J. (2015). Representation and Dynamic Implications of Mental Models of Food Systems. 33rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Srinivasa, C., Kareemulla, K., Krishnan, P., Murthy, G. R. K., Ramesh, P., Ananthan, P. S., et al. (2020). Agro-ecosystem based sustainability indicators for climate resilient agriculture in India : A conceptual framework. Ecological Indicators, June 2018, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.038 Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics; Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (p. 1008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336 Sulemana, I., & James, H. S. (2014). Farmer identity, ethical attitudes and environmental practices. Ecological Economics, 98, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.011 Tamayo M., P. J., Zapata P., J. L., & Salazar, L. F. (1999). El mosaico y la virosis del tomate de árbol en el Altiplano Norte de Antioquia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, 52(2), 781–785. Tapasco, J. (2009). Formalización de un modelo de pago por servicios ambientales a nivel de cuenca y algunas de sus incidencias sobre la pobreza rural. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 6(63), 87–105. Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (2009). Addressing the dynamics of agri-food systems: an emerging agenda for social science research. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.03.001 Tran Thanh, A. (2018). Dynamics of the Socio-Ecosystems of Riogrande basin, Antioquia, Colombia. Ugarte, C. M., Kwon, H., Andrews, S. S., & Wander, M. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of soil organic matter response to soil management practices: An approach to evaluate conservation indicators. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(5), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.5.422 Unger, P. W. (1992). Infiltration of simulated rainfall: tillage system and crop residue effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(1), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010045x Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2012). VALORACIÓN ECONÓMICA, ECOLÓGICA Y CULTURAL DE BIENES Y SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO GRANDE. APROXIMACION CONCEPTUAL Y METODOLÓGICA INFORME FINAL Contrato 8811 CORANTIOQUIA ESCUELA DE GEOCIENCIAS Y MEDIO AMBIENTE VALORACION ECONÓMICA , ECOLÓG. 547. Uthes, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Studies on agri-environmental measures: A survey of the literature. Environmental Management, 51(1), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6 Valencia-Pinzón, A. (2019). Insumos agropecuarios. Ministerio de Agricultura, 1, 1–23. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Documentos/5. LINEAMIENTOS DE LA POLÍTICA DE INSUMOS AGROPECURIOS.pdf Vargas Rodríguez, D. Y. (2018). EVALUACIÓN DE ESQUEMAS DE PAGOS POR SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES ASOCIADOS A ÁREAS ESTRATÉGICAS DEL RÍO MAGDALENA, MERCANTILISMO DE EMOCIONES. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Velázquez-torres, D. (2015). Sistemas complejos adaptativos , sistemas socio- ecológicos y resiliencia. 11–32. Velez, J. I. (2001). Desarrollo de un modelo hidrológico conceptual y distribuido orientado a la simulación de las crecidas. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Vélez, L. D., & Gastó, J. (1999). Metodología y determinación de los estilos de agricultura en escala predial. Verburg, P. H., van Berkel, D. B., van Doorn, A. M., van Eupen, M., & van den Heiligenberg, H. A. R. M. (2010). Trajectories of land use change in Europe: A model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecology, 25(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9347-7 Villegas-palacio, C., Berrouet, L., López, C., Ruiz, A., & Upegui, A. (2016). Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country : Three case studies on ecological , socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosystem Services, 22(October), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.017 Walters, C. J. ., & Holling, C. . S. . (1990). Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning. 71(6), 2060–2068. Willock, J., Deary, I. J., Edwards-Jones, G., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., Sutherland, A., et al. (1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00814.x Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR, 9. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001765 Zeng, J., Liu, X., Song, L., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Shen, C., et al. (2016). Nitrogen fertilization directly affects soil bacterial diversity and indirectly affects bacterial community composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 92(October), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.018 Zhang, Y., Li, C., Zhou, X., & Moore III, B. (2002). A simulation model linking crop growth and soil biogeochemistry for sustainable agriculture. Ecological Modelling 151 (2002) 75-108, 151, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00527-0
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	xv, 147 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.coverage.region.none.fl_str_mv	Andes colombianos
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Medellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv	Departamento de Geociencias y Medo Ambiente
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Minas
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Medellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
institution	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/3/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/4/1152438227.2021.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/5/1152438227.2021.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	cccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6 a2ea079c66d853dca566f415e6a93be4 4c946524913e6d4bb95c80689be20035
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_	1814089651905888256
spelling	Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Villegas Palacio, Clara Ines64741421b620545049bdfecaf094b645600Osorio Múnera, Juan David2831acdfcce01a350675273bef354daa600Vargas Betancur, Cristina14c9c6cec257bde6eca6470a8bbe955a2021-10-08T19:21:23Z2021-10-08T19:21:23Z2020-12-18https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80453Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/IlustracionesLos cambios en los ecosistemas se afectan por los procesos de decisión individual y/o colectiva que interactúan con el entorno natural en horizontes de tiempo que se extienden de un día a varias décadas (Quesnel et al., 2015) incidiendo en la dinámica de los agroecosistemas, los cuales se dividen en tres sistemas que interactúan, de decisión, operativo y biofísico (Clouaire & Rellier, 2009). Esta investigación propone el análisis de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socio-ecológicos en la Cuenca Hidrográfica Río Grande y Río Chico ubicada en los Andes Colombianos, estratégica en la provisión de agua potable para el Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá. La dinámica de los agroecosistemas se realizó por medio de la identificación e interrelación de las variables de cada sistema a partir de una revisión sistemática de literatura, análisis de la trayectoria de la cuenca, características socioeconómicas, productivas, ambientales y finalmente se validó en campo con un grupo focal. Se encontró que las decisiones de los productores en los agroecosistemas de la Cuenca no sólo están influenciadas por las motivaciones económicas asociadas a los costos y ganancias de la producción, sino también por las motivaciones de carácter social y cultural, cómo la tradición, que determinan las características de la zona y la transferencia de conocimiento por generaciones, las experiencias que generan temor e incertidumbre frente a los resultados de la producción, la presencia de cooperativas, lazos de confianza entre la comunidad de los agricultores que fomentan a la cooperación y colaboración. (Texto tomado de la fuente)Changes in ecosystems are affected by individual and / or collective decision processes that interact with the natural environment in time horizons that extend from one day to several decades (Quesnel et al., 2015), influencing the dynamics of the agroecosystems, which are divided into three interacting systems, decision, operational and biophysical (Clouaire & Rellier, 2009). This research proposes the analysis of agroecosystems under the socio-ecological systems approach in the Río Grande and Río Chico Watershed located in the Colombian Andes, strategic in the provision of drinking water for the Metropolitan Area of the Valle de Aburrá. The agroecosystems dynamics was carried out by means of the identification and interrelation of the variables of each system from a systematic literature review, analysis of the trajectory of the watershed, socioeconomic, productive, environmental characteristics and finally it was validated in the field with a focus group. It was found that the decisions of the producers in the agroecosystems of the wathershed are not only influenced by the economic motivations associated with the costs and profits of production, but also by the social and cultural motivations, such as tradition, which determine the characteristics of the area and the transfer of knowledge for generations, experiences that generate fear and uncertainty regarding the results of production, the presence of cooperatives, ties of trust between the community of farmers that encourage cooperation and collaboration.MaestríaMagíster en Medio Ambiente y DesarrolloSistemas socioecológicos y dinámica de los agroecosistemasxv, 147 páginasapplication/pdfUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y DesarrolloDepartamento de Geociencias y Medo AmbienteFacultad de MinasMedellín, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energíaEcología agrícolaAgroecosistemasAgricultural ecologyAgricultural biotic communitiesCuenca Hidrográfica Río GrandeSistemas socio ecológicosAgroecosistemasDinámica de sistemasDinámica de sistemasSocioecological systemsAgroecosystemsSystem dynamicsCausal loopsDecision makingDinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.Agroecosystems dynamics under the socioecological system approach. Case study : Río Grande y Río Chico watershed.Trabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMAndes colombianosAcevedo, M., Rosales, J., Delgado, L., Ablan, M., Davila, J., Callicot, J. B., et al. (2007). Modelos de interacción humano-ambiental: el enfoque de la Biocomplejidad. Revista Ecosistemas, 16(3), 56–68. http://www.revistaecosistemas.net/index.php/ecosistemas/article/view/93Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacityy.Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., & Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1251Alhameid, A., Ibrahim, M., Kumar, S., Sexton, P., & Schumacher, T. E. (2017). Soil organic carbon changes impacted by crop rotational diversity under no-till farming in South Dakota, USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 868–877. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0121Altieri, M. (2015). Agroecología : principios y estrategias para diseñar sistemas agrarios sustentables (Issue June).Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74(1–3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2Altieri, M., & Nicholls, C. I. (2013). Agroecología y resiliencia al cambio climatico. Agroecología, 8(1), 7–20. file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/182921-Texto del artículo-664981-1-10-20130923 (1).pdfAnderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), art18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00610-090118Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004). The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(6), 1945–1962. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945Banco Mundial. (2018). Colombia Nota de Política sobre la Implementación del Seguro Agrícola Catastrófico.Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Espinosa-Goded, M., & Dupraz, P. (2010). Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(7), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.490058Barton, C. M., Ullah, I. I., & Bergin, S. (2010). Land use, water and Mediterranean landscapes: Modelling long-term dynamics of complex socio-ecological systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1931), 5275–5297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0193Beare, M. H., Parmelee, R. W., Hendrix, P. F., Cheng, W., Coleman, D. C., & Crossley, D. A. (1992). Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937317Belcher, K. W., Boehm, M. M., & Fulton, M. E. (2004). Agroecosystem sustainability: A system simulation model approach. Agricultural Systems, 79(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00072-6BERGEVOET, R. H. M. (2011). Entrepreneurship of Dutch dairy farmers.Bergez, J. E., Debaeke, P., Deumier, J. M., Lacroix, B., Leenhardt, D., Leroy, P., et al. (2001). MODERATO: An object-oriented decision tool for designing maize irrigation schedules. Ecological Modelling, 137(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00431-2Berrio Giraldo, L., Villegas Palacio, C., & Arango Aramburo, S. (2019). MODELACIÓN DINÁMICA DE SISTEMAS SOCIO-ECOLÓGICOS. ANALISIS DE LA DINÁMICA EN EL CAMBIO DE COBERTURA DEL SUELO EN CUENCAS ESTRATEGICAS.Berrouet, Lina Maria. (2018). Vulnerabilidad de sistemas sociales frente a la modificación de servicios ecosistémicos en cuencas hidrográficas de media montaña.Berrouet, Lina María, Machado, J., & Villegas-Palacio, C. (2018). Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecological Indicators, 84(February 2017), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051Biggs, R., Schluter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., Burnsilver, S., Cundill, G., et al. (2012). Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836Blanco, C., & Carlos, J. (1982). Procedimiento para hacer un eje o un friso cronológico. 4–6.Blanco, J. (2008). Integrated Water Resource Management in Colombia : Paralysis by Analysis? International Journal of Water Resources, March 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701747686Böhme, L., Langer, U., & Böhme, F. (2005). Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 109(1–2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.017Bolaños Valencia, I. V. (2017). Percepción social del riesgo por pérdida de servicios ecosistémicos - caso de estudio cuenca de los ríos grande y chico, antioquia. 151. http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/61270/Booth, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics : initial results of a systems thinking inventory. 16(4), 249–286.Booth, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics : initial results of a systems thinking inventory. 16(4), 249–286. Brenner, J., Jiménez, J. A., Sardá, R., & Garola, A. (2010). An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.10.008Bulatkin, G. A. (2012). Analysis of energy flows in agroecosystems. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 82(4), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331612040089Burton, R. J. F., & Wilson, G. A. (2006). Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.004Cabel, J. F., & Oelofse, M. (2012). An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118Calderón, A., García, F., & Martinez, G. (2006). Indicators of Raw Milk Quality in Different Regions of Colombia. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 11(1), 725–737.Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2015a). Manual de la Papa.Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2015b). Manual de Tomate de árbol. https://www.ccb.org.co/content/download/13726/175108/file/Tomate de árbol.pdfCardona, H., & Estefany, P. R. (2018). Análisis de redes sociales para la gobernanza del agua: caso cuenca Río Grande, Norte de Antioquia. 1–43.Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Diaz, S., et al. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106Carulla Fornaguera, J., & Ortega García, E. (2016). Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: retos y oportunidades. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 24(2), 83–87.Caso, E. L., & Módulo, D. E. L. (2008). Condiciones ambientales y producción de leche de un hato de ganado jersey en el trópico húmedo: el caso del Módulo Lechero-SDA/UCR. Agronomia Costarricense, 32(1), 87–94.Castaño Giraldo, N. E., & Cardona Gómez, M. A. (2014). Factores determinantes en la inestabilidad del sector agrícola colombiano. En Contexto, 2, 91–107.Chapin, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World (Issue May 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2Chatelin, M. H., Aubry, C., Poussin, J. C., Meynard, J. M., Massé, J., Verjux, N., et al. (2005). DéciBlé, a software package for wheat crop management simulation. Agricultural Systems, 83(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.03.003Cleves, A. (2018). Resiliencia de agroecosistemas citrícolas a la variabilidad climática en el Departamento del Meta , Colombia.Clouaire, R. M., & Rellier, J. P. (2009). Modelling and simulating work practices in agriculture. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 4(1/2), 42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.026253COLANTA. (2012). Manual para producir leche de calidad.Collins, S. L., Carpenter, S. R., Swinton, S. M., Orenstein, D. E., Childers, D. L., Gragson, T. L., et al. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(6), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1890/100068Corantioquia. (2017). INFORME DE AVANCE DE LA EJECUCIÓN DEL PLAN DE ACCIÓN “ POR EL PATRIMONIO AMBIENTAL DE NUESTRO TERRITORIO .”CORANTIOQUIA. (2015a). Caracterización Biofísica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico.CORANTIOQUIA. (2015b). Caracterización Socioeconómica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico.CORANTIOQUIA. (2015b). Caracterización Socioeconómica de la Cuenca del Río Grande y Río Chico. Corantioquia, & Alcadia de Santa Rosa de Osos. (2015). Consolidación de iniciativas de conservación en el municipio de santa rosa de osos - antioquia. 134.CORANTIOQUIA, & Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2015). Actualización y Ajuste Plan de Ordenación y Manejo de la Cuenca de los Ríos Grande y Chico.Cros, M., Duru, M., Garcia, F., & Martin-clouaire, R. (2001). Simulating rotational grazing management. 27, 139–145.Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., et al. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 8(8), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0129-zDANE. (2016). Efectos del clima en la producción de la ganadería de leche. Boletín Mensual INSUMOS Y FACTORES ASOCIADOS A LA PRODUCCIÓN AGROPECUARIA, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001452Darghouth, S., Ward, C., Gambarelli, G., Styger, E., & Roux, J. (2008). Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: Lessons for scaling up. Water Sector Board Discussion Papers, 11, 1–164. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/05/9608907/watershed-management-approaches-policies-operations-lessons-scaling-up%5Cnhttp://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2008/06/26/000020439_20080626162646/Rendered/PDF/442Dávila Betancurth, J. C. (2016). Variables Explicativas de la Vulnerabilidad Biofísica y Socio Económica al Cambio Climático en Agroecosistemas de la Cuenca del Rio Grande Antioquia.Dávila, J. C., & Vélez, L. D. (2015). Vulnerabilidad ecológica y económica de sistemas especializados en producción de leche en la Cuenca del Riogrande – Colombia. Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroecología, 1–5.De Aranzabal, I., Schmitz, M. F., Aguilera, P., & Pineda, F. D. (2008). Modelling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecological systems. A case of study in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Indicators, 8(5), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.11.003De los Ríos Cardona, J. C. (2015). VULNERABILIDADE DA AGRICULTURA ÀS MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS NA BACIA DO RIO GRANDE (ANTIOQUIA, COLÔMBIA): UMA ABORDAGEM A PARTIR DO TERRITÓRIO E DA RESILIÊNCIA DOS SISTEMAS SOCIO-ECOLÓGICOS. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886Dee, L. E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S. D., Hines, J., et al. (2017). Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011Denisov, V. V. (2001). Development of the crop simulation system DIASPORA. Agronomy Journal, 93(3), 660–666. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.933660xDepartamento Nacional de Planeación. (2017). Documento Conpes 3886. Lineamientos de política y programa nacional de pago por servicios ambientales para la construcción de paz. Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, 94.Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., & Reed, M. S. (2010). Anticipating Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Pastoral Systems: Using Dynamic Systems Models for the Kalahari. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art17/Dourojeanni, A., Jouravlev, A., & Chávez, G. (2002). Gestión del agua a nivel de cuencas. teoría y práctica. In United Nations Publications (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/1680-9025Duque, G., & Escobar, C. (2012). Consolidación de suelos. Mecanica de Los Suelos, 80–109. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/1864/10/cap9.pdfEivazi, F., Bayan, M. R., & Schmidt, K. (2003). Select soil enzyme activities in the historic Sanborn Field as affected by long-term cropping systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34(15–16), 2259–2275. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120024062Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Filatova, T., Rook, J., & Jakeman, A. J. (2015). A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: From cognitive maps to agent-based models. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.028Emmerling, C., Schloter, M., Hartmann, A., & Kandeler, E. (2002). Functional diversity of soil organisms - A review of recent research activities in Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408::AID-JPLN408>3.0.CO;2-3Emmerling, C., Schloter, M., Hartmann, A., & Kandeler, E. (2002). Functional diversity of soil organisms - A review of recent research activities in Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408::AID-JPLN408>3.0.CO;2-3FAO. (2007). Adaptation to climate change in agriculture , forestry and fisheries : Perspective , framework and. Interdepartmental Working Group on Climate Change, 32pp. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/j9271e/j9271e.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.fao.org/NR/climpag/index_fr.aspFAO. (2017). Seguros agrícolas para la agricultura familiar en américa latina y el caribe. Lineamientos para su diseño e implementación. http://www.draplvt.mamaot.pt/DRAPLVT/Comunicacao/Noticias/Documents/seminario_Agricultura_rio_maior_2017/2_Seguros_agricolas_CA Seguros.pdfFarm, N., Farm, N., Stewardship, C., Entry, O., Stewardship, L., & Government, U. K. (2012). Materials and Methods . Part 1 . Details of the study site Part 2 . Constructing the interaction networks. Science.Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Dahe, Q., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., et al. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. In Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245Fierer, N., Strickland, M. S., Liptzin, D., Bradford, M. A., & Cleveland, C. C. (2009). Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecology Letters, 12(11), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01360.xFischer, C., Leydesdorff, L., Schophaus, M., Dorland, J., Jørgensen, M. S., Chan, L., et al. (2010). The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. In Social Studies of Science (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195.Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. In Annual Review of Environment and Resources (Vol. 30). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511Fondevilla, C., Àngels Colomer, M., Fillat, F., & Tappeiner, U. (2016). Using a new PDP modelling approach for land-use and land-cover change predictions: A case study in the Stubai Valley (Central Alps). Ecological Modelling, 322(February), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.016Forrester, J. W. (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3(C), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80001-XFrancis, C. (2010). Book review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.R9013Franko, U., & Wilfried, M. (2001). Integration of a Crop Growth Model with a Model of Soil Dynamics. 93(June), 666–670.Galarza, F. B. (2009). Choices under Risk in Rural Peru. 17708.Gallopin Gilverto. (2013). Sostenibilidad y desarrollo Sostenible: un enfoque sistémico. In nsabilidad del autor y pueden no coincidir con las de la Organización. PPublicación de las Naciones Unidas : Vol. S.02.II.G. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004García-Leoz, V., Villegas, J. C., Suescún, D., Flórez, C. P., Merino-Martín, L., Betancur, T., et al. (2018). Land cover effects on water balance partitioning in the Colombian Andes: improved water availability in early stages of natural vegetation recovery. Regional Environmental Change, 18(4), 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1249-7Gasson, R. (1973). And farmers. Jornal of Agricultural Economics, 24(3), 521–542.Gaviria, B. C. (2007). Calidad higiénica y sanitaria de la leche cruda. In Fondo Editorial Biogénesis (pp. 115–122).Geilfus, F. (2005). 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: Diagnóstico, Planificación Monitoreo y Evaluación.Gerber, P., Chilonda, P., Franceschini, G., & Menzi, H. (2005). Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. Bioresource Technology, 96(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.016Gerzabek, M. H., Antil, R. S., Kögel-Knabner, I., Knicker, H., Kirchmann, H., & Haberhauer, G. (2006). How are soil use and management reflected by soil organic matter characteristics: A spectroscopic approach. European Journal of Soil Science, 57(4), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00794.xGiorgio Castellaro, G., Klee, G., & Chavarria R., J. (2007). Un modelo de simulación de sistemas de engorda de bovinos a pastoreo. Agricultura Técnica, 67(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0365-28072007000200006Gormley, L. H. L., & Sinclair, F. L. (2003). Modelaje participativo del impacto de los árboles en la productividad de las fincas y la biodiversidad regional en paisajes fragmentados en América Central. Agroforestería En Las Américas, 10, 103–108.Greiner, R. (2015). Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems, 137, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.005Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.Hardner, J., & Rice, R. (2002). Rethinking Green Consumerism. Scientific American, 89–95.Hazell, P. et al. (2010). El potencial para la ampliación y sostenibilidad de los seguros basados en índices climáticos para la agricultura y subsistencia rural. 151.Hirji, R., & Davis, R. (2009). Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects. Water Resources, 117, 181. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7940-0Holmann, F., & Rica, C. (2002). El uso de modelos de simulación como herramienta para la toma de decisiones en la promoción de nuevas alternativas forrajeras: el caso de Costa Rica y Perú* Using simulation models as a tool for promoting improved forages alternatives in. Latinoam. Prod. Anim, 10(1), 35–45.Hördur V. Haraldsson. (2004). Introduction to System Thinking and Causal Loop Diagrams. In Reports in Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Issue January 2004).Hynes, S., & Garvey, E. (2009). Modelling farmers’ participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: An application to the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00210.xIfejika Speranza, C., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social – ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 28, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005Ingram, J., Gaskell, P., Mills, J., & Short, C. (2013). Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations. Land Use Policy, 31, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.007Jairo, Á. P. J. (2013). EVALUACIÓN DEL IMPACTO DEL MICROCRÉDITO EN LA COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO COLANTA.Janssen, M. A., Bodin, Ö., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R., et al. (2006). Toward a Network Perspective of the Study of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/15Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Chapter 30 Governing Social-Ecological Systems. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2(05), 1465–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02030-7Jaramillo Londoño, A. R., & Areiza Segura, A. M. (2012). Análisis del Mercado de la Leche y Derivados Lácteos en Colombia (2008 – 2012).Kandeler, E., Stemmer, M., & Klimanek, E. M. (1999). Response of soil microbial biomass, urease and xylanase within particle size fractions to long-term soil management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00115-1Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cline, R.G., Harris, R.F., Schuman, G.E., et al. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61. http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/16713Kinoshita, R., Schindelbeck, R. R., & van Es, H. M. (2017). Quantitative soil profile-scale assessment of the sustainability of long-term maize residue and tillage management. Soil and Tillage Research, 174(May), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.05.010Kronberg, S. L., & Ryschawy, J. (2018). Integration of crop and livestock production in temperate regions to improve agroecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and human nutrition and health. In Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00015-7ucharik, C. J. (2003). Evaluation of a process-based agro-ecosystem model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. Corn Belt: Simulations of the interannual variability in maize yield. Earth Interactions, 7(14), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1175/1087-3562(2003)007<0001:EOAPAM>2.0.CO;2Kumar, A., Dorodnikov, M., Splettstößer, T., Kuzyakov, Y., & Pausch, J. (2017). Effects of maize roots on aggregate stability and enzyme activities in soil. Geoderma, 306(October 2016), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.007Kurukulasuriya, P., & Rosenthal, S. (2003). Climate change and agriculture. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90186-2Lacitignola, D., Petrosillo, I., Cataldi, M., & Zurlini, G. (2007). Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability. Ecological Modelling, 206(1–2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.034Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(5), 5875–5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875Lastra-Bravo, X. B., Hubbard, C., Garrod, G., & Tolón-Becerra, A. (2015). What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis. Environmental Science and Policy, 54, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002Lobell, D. B., & Gourdji, S. M. (2012). The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiology, 160(4), 1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208298Lu, M., Zhou, X., Luo, Y., Yang, Y., Fang, C., Chen, J., et al. (2011). Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140(1–2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.010Machado, J., Villegas-Palacio, C., Loaiza, J. C., & Castañeda, D. A. (2019). Soil natural capital vulnerability to environmental change. A regional scale approach for tropical soils in the Colombian Andes. Ecological Indicators, 96(65), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.060Machado Vargas, M. M., Nicholls, C. I., Márquez, S. M., & Turbay, S. (2015). Caracterización de nueve agroecosistemas de café de la cuenca del río Porce, Colombia, con un enfoque agroecológico. Idesia (Arica), 33(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34292015000100008MADS. (2018). Decreto 1007 de 2018. 1–10.Marinari, S., Masciandaro, G., Ceccanti, B., & Grego, S. (2000). Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresource Technology, 72(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00094-2Marinari, Sara, Mancinelli, R., Campiglia, E., & Grego, S. (2006). Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy. Ecological Indicators, 6(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.029Marsiglia Rivera, S. M. (2017). Capacidad adaptativa de los sistemas sociales ante la pérdida o deterioro de los servicios ecosistémicos.Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Montes, C. (2009). Un marco conceptual para la gestión de las interacciones naturaleza-sociedad en un mundo cambiante. Cuides. Cuaderno Interdisciplinar de Desarrollo Sostenible, 3, 229–258.Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Rellier, J. P., & Duru, M. (2011). A simulation framework for the design of grassland-based beef-cattle farms. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.002Martínez, I., Chervet, A., Weisskopf, P., Sturny, W. G., Rek, J., & Keller, T. (2016). Two decades of no-till in the Oberacker long-term field experiment: Part II. Soil porosity and gas transport parameters. Soil and Tillage Research, 163, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.05.020Martínez, J., & Esteve, M. (2007). Gestión integrada de cuencas costeras : dinámica de los nutrientes en la cuenca del Mar Menor (sudeste de España). Revista de Dinámica de Sistemas, 3(Marzo), 2–23.Mauricio, R. M., Ribeiro, R. S., Paciullo, D. S. C., Cangussú, M. A., Murgueitio, E., Chará, J., et al. (2018). Silvopastoral systems in latin america for biodiversity, environmental, and socioeconomic improvements. Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00018-2Mbizvo, C., Duraiappah, A., Koetz, T., Brondizio, E., Bartus, G., Roué, M., et al. (2014). The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002Melland, A. R., Antille, D. L., & Dang, Y. P. (2017). Effects of strategic tillage on short-Term erosion, nutrient loss in runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Research, 55(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16136Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., & Jakeman, A. J. (2003). A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 18(8–9), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2010). Balance de Gobierno Logros y Retos del Sector Agropecuario.Ministerio de agricultura y desarrollo rural MADR. (2012). Resolución 000017 de 2012 (p. 18).Ministerio de la Protección Social. (2006). Decreto Número 616 De 2006. Ministerio de La Protección Social, 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1937.tb03385.xMontealegre Bocanegra, J. (2014). Actualización del componente Meteorológico del modelo institucional del IDEAM sobre el efecto climático de los fenómenos El Niño y La Niña en Colombia, como insumo para el Atlas Climatológico. IDEAM (Instituto de Hidrologia, Meteorologia y Estudios Ambientales), 1–134. http://www.ideam.gov.co/documents/21021/440517/Actualizacion+Modelo+Institucional+El+Niño+-+La+Niña.pdf/02f5e53b-0349-41f1-87e0-5513286d1d1dMurgueitio, E. R., Chará, J. O., Barahona, R. R., Cuartas, C. C., & Naranjo, J. R. (2014). Intensive Silvopastoral Systems (ISPS), mitigation and adaptation tool to climate change. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 17(3), 501–507.Murphy, G., Hynes, S., Murphy, E., & O’Donoghue, C. (2014). An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness. Land Use Policy, 39, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.015Nunes, M. R., van Es, H. M., Schindelbeck, R., Ristow, A. J., & Ryan, M. (2018). No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield. Geoderma, 328(April), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.031Orduño Torres, M. A., Kallas, Z., & Ornelas Herrera, S. I. (2018). Analysis of Farmers ’ Stated Risk Using Lotteries and Their Perceptions of Climate Change in the Northwest of Mexico. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9010004Osorio Múnera, J. D., García-tavera, L. M., Bustamante Ochoa, E. A., & Uribe Rivera, N. (2019). Optimización de uso del suelo acorde con restricciones ambientales y sociales: caso cuenca de Riogrande II. Semestre Económico, 22(52), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v22n52a2Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Cees, G., Muhammad, H., Enrique, I., El, M., et al. (2004). Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes. ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT PAPER, 96.Pahl-wostl, C. (2002). Towards sustainability in the water sector – The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. 64, 394–411.Pannell, D. J. (1995). Economic aspects of legume management and legume research in dryland farming systems of southern Australia. Agricultural Systems, 49(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(94)00049-WPanpakdee, C., & Limnirankul, B. (2017). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Indicators for assessing social-ecological resilience : A case study of organic rice production in northern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.003Pérez-Maqueo, O., Delfín, C., Fregoso, A., Cotler, H., & Equihua, M. (2005). Modelos de simulación para la elaboración y evaluación de los programas de servicios ambientales hídricos. Gaceta Ecológica, 76, 47–66.Pérez Gallardo, S. J. (2001). MODELO PARA EVALUAR LA EROSION HIDRICA EN COLOMBIA UTILIZANDO SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION GEOGRAFICA.Pimentel, D., & Burgess, M. (2005). An environmental, energetic and economic comparison of organic and conventional farming systems. Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems, Vol.3, 55(7), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7796-5_6Pomar, C., Harris, D. L., Savoie, P., & Minvielle, F. (1991). Computer simulation model of swine production systems: III. A dynamic herd simulation model including reproduction. Journal of Animal Science, 69(7), 2822–2836. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6972822xQuesnel, G., Akplogan, M., Bonneau, M., Martin-Clouaire, R., Peyrard, N., Rellier, J. P., et al. (2015). Decision in agroecosystems advanced modelling techniques studying global changes in environmental sciences. Developments in Environmental Modelling, 27, 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63536-5.00010-7Ram, C. D., & Orrego, S. A. (2015). Trayectorias de cambios en coberturas terrestres en una cuenca de los Andes colombianos: Río Grande, 1986-2012. 4.Ramirez Guerra, S. (2018). Retrospectiva del sector lácteo colombiano.Ramírez León, J. M. (2009). Producción de sedimentos en cuencas: revisión de criterios y aplicabilidad a la cuenca del río Apulco. June 2009, 205.Rapidel, B., Ripoche, A., Allinne, C., Metay, A., Deheuvels, O., Lamanda, N., et al. (2015). Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0317-yRaskin, P. D. (2006). World Lines : Pathways , Pivots , and the Global Future.Reicosky, D. C., Sauer, T. J., & Hatfi, J. L. (2011). Productivity and Environmental Quality : Tillage Impacts. 56267, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.2136/2011soilmanagement.c2Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G. S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A. P., & Polasky, S. (2013). Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1890/120144Ríos, M. (2010). Control biológico de la Antracnosis (Colletotrichum gloesporioides Penz) en tomate de árbol (Solanum betaceum) en el ecotipo: amarillo puntón, mediante hongos endofitos antagonistas.Rodriguez-Iturb, I. (2000). Ecohydrology : A hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 3–9.Rotz, C. A., Buckmaster, D. R., & Comerford, J. W. (2005). A beef herd model for simulating feed intake , animal performance , and manure excretion in farm systems The online version of this article , along with updated information and services , is located on the World Wide Web at : A beef herd model for simulat. Journal of Animal Science, 83(June 2014), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74032-6Ruiz-Cortés, T., Orozco, S., Rodríguez, L., Idárraga, J., & Olivera, M. (2012). Factores Que Afectan El Recuento De Ufc En La Leche En Tanque En Hatos Lecheros Del Norte De Antioquia-Colombia. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, m, 147–155.Scanlon, B. R., Gates, J. B., Reedy, R. C., Jackson, W. A., & Bordovsky, J. P. (2010). Effects of irrigated agroecosystems: 2. Quality of soil water and groundwater in the southern High Plains, Texas. Water Resources Research, 46(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008428Schulte, R. P. O., Creamer, R. E., Donnellan, T., Farrelly, N., Fealy, R., O’Donoghue, C., et al. (2014). Functional land management: A framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Environmental Science and Policy, 38, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.002Secretaría Jurídica de Bogotá. (2002). Decerto 1729 de 2002.Sepúlveda López, L. P. (2013). Modelo para la definición de áreas estratégicas para la conservación de suelos a partir de la determinación de la susceptibilidad a la erosión hídirica.Serrato, B., Díaz, R., & Bermúdez, L. (1999). ÓPTIMO DE COBERTURA VEGETAL EN RELACIÓN A LAS PÉRDIDAS DE SUELO POR EROSIÓN HÍDRICA Y LAS PÉRDIDAS DE LLUVIA POR INTERCEPTACIÓN. January.Shi, T., & Gill, R. (2005). Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: The case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model. Ecological Economics, 53(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.006Siebert, R., Toogood, M., & Knierim, A. (2006). Factors affecting european farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.xSoussana, J. F., & Lemaire, G. (2014). Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 190, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.012Spicer, J. (2015). Representation and Dynamic Implications of Mental Models of Food Systems. 33rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.Srinivasa, C., Kareemulla, K., Krishnan, P., Murthy, G. R. K., Ramesh, P., Ananthan, P. S., et al. (2020). Agro-ecosystem based sustainability indicators for climate resilient agriculture in India : A conceptual framework. Ecological Indicators, June 2018, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.038Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics; Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (p. 1008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336Sulemana, I., & James, H. S. (2014). Farmer identity, ethical attitudes and environmental practices. Ecological Economics, 98, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.011Tamayo M., P. J., Zapata P., J. L., & Salazar, L. F. (1999). El mosaico y la virosis del tomate de árbol en el Altiplano Norte de Antioquia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, 52(2), 781–785.Tapasco, J. (2009). Formalización de un modelo de pago por servicios ambientales a nivel de cuenca y algunas de sus incidencias sobre la pobreza rural. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 6(63), 87–105.Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (2009). Addressing the dynamics of agri-food systems: an emerging agenda for social science research. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.03.001Tran Thanh, A. (2018). Dynamics of the Socio-Ecosystems of Riogrande basin, Antioquia, Colombia.Ugarte, C. M., Kwon, H., Andrews, S. S., & Wander, M. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of soil organic matter response to soil management practices: An approach to evaluate conservation indicators. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(5), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.5.422Unger, P. W. (1992). Infiltration of simulated rainfall: tillage system and crop residue effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(1), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010045xUniversidad Nacional de Colombia. (2012). VALORACIÓN ECONÓMICA, ECOLÓGICA Y CULTURAL DE BIENES Y SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO GRANDE. APROXIMACION CONCEPTUAL Y METODOLÓGICA INFORME FINAL Contrato 8811 CORANTIOQUIA ESCUELA DE GEOCIENCIAS Y MEDIO AMBIENTE VALORACION ECONÓMICA , ECOLÓG. 547.Uthes, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Studies on agri-environmental measures: A survey of the literature. Environmental Management, 51(1), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6Valencia-Pinzón, A. (2019). Insumos agropecuarios. Ministerio de Agricultura, 1, 1–23. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Documentos/5. LINEAMIENTOS DE LA POLÍTICA DE INSUMOS AGROPECURIOS.pdfVargas Rodríguez, D. Y. (2018). EVALUACIÓN DE ESQUEMAS DE PAGOS POR SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES ASOCIADOS A ÁREAS ESTRATÉGICAS DEL RÍO MAGDALENA, MERCANTILISMO DE EMOCIONES. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Velázquez-torres, D. (2015). Sistemas complejos adaptativos , sistemas socio- ecológicos y resiliencia. 11–32.Velez, J. I. (2001). Desarrollo de un modelo hidrológico conceptual y distribuido orientado a la simulación de las crecidas. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Vélez, L. D., & Gastó, J. (1999). Metodología y determinación de los estilos de agricultura en escala predial.Verburg, P. H., van Berkel, D. B., van Doorn, A. M., van Eupen, M., & van den Heiligenberg, H. A. R. M. (2010). Trajectories of land use change in Europe: A model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecology, 25(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9347-7Villegas-palacio, C., Berrouet, L., López, C., Ruiz, A., & Upegui, A. (2016). Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country : Three case studies on ecological , socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosystem Services, 22(October), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.017Walters, C. J. ., & Holling, C. . S. . (1990). Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning. 71(6), 2060–2068.Willock, J., Deary, I. J., Edwards-Jones, G., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., Sutherland, A., et al. (1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00814.xWunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR, 9. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001765Zeng, J., Liu, X., Song, L., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Shen, C., et al. (2016). Nitrogen fertilization directly affects soil bacterial diversity and indirectly affects bacterial community composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 92(October), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.018Zhang, Y., Li, C., Zhou, X., & Moore III, B. (2002). A simulation model linking crop growth and soil biogeochemistry for sustainable agriculture. Ecological Modelling 151 (2002) 75-108, 151, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00527-0Trajectories of Social-Ecological Systems in Latin American Watersheds: Facing Complexity and Vulnerability in the context of Climate ChangeColcienciasEstudiantesLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83964https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/3/license.txtcccfe52f796b7c63423298c2d3365fc6MD53ORIGINAL1152438227.2021.pdf1152438227.2021.pdfTesis Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrolloapplication/pdf3784726https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/4/1152438227.2021.pdfa2ea079c66d853dca566f415e6a93be4MD54THUMBNAIL1152438227.2021.pdf.jpg1152438227.2021.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5145https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/80453/5/1152438227.2021.pdf.jpg4c946524913e6d4bb95c80689be20035MD55unal/80453oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/804532024-07-30 23:11:08.304Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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

Dinámicas de los agroecosistemas bajo el enfoque de sistemas socioecológicos. Caso de estudio : Cuenca Hidrográfica del Río Grande y Río Chico.

Publicaciones similares