Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective
ilustraciones
- Autores:
-
Correa Ospina, Martha Liliana
- Tipo de recurso:
- Doctoral thesis
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/84410
- Palabra clave:
- 650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general
IOS
E-government
E-invoicing
E-services
Critical realism
Mechanisms
Gobierno electrónico
Servicio electrónico
Sistemas inter-organizacionales
Factura electrónica
Realismo crítico
Mecanismos
Gobierno electrónico
Pequeña empresa
Cambio tecnológico
Electronic governance
Small enterprises
Technological change
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
id |
UNACIONAL2_7522d00faf3abefade339f0f54a29357 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/84410 |
network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adopción de servicios interorganizacionales de gobierno electrónico: perspectiva de la microempresa |
title |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
spellingShingle |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective 650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general IOS E-government E-invoicing E-services Critical realism Mechanisms Gobierno electrónico Servicio electrónico Sistemas inter-organizacionales Factura electrónica Realismo crítico Mecanismos Gobierno electrónico Pequeña empresa Cambio tecnológico Electronic governance Small enterprises Technological change |
title_short |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
title_full |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
title_fullStr |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
title_sort |
Inter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspective |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Correa Ospina, Martha Liliana |
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Díaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Correa Ospina, Martha Liliana |
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistic |
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-4431 |
dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001484994 |
dc.contributor.researchgate.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martha-Correa-O |
dc.contributor.googlescholar.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZolsMX4AAAAJ&hl=en |
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general |
topic |
650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general IOS E-government E-invoicing E-services Critical realism Mechanisms Gobierno electrónico Servicio electrónico Sistemas inter-organizacionales Factura electrónica Realismo crítico Mecanismos Gobierno electrónico Pequeña empresa Cambio tecnológico Electronic governance Small enterprises Technological change |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
IOS E-government E-invoicing E-services Critical realism Mechanisms |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno electrónico Servicio electrónico Sistemas inter-organizacionales Factura electrónica Realismo crítico Mecanismos |
dc.subject.unesco.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno electrónico Pequeña empresa Cambio tecnológico |
dc.subject.unesco.eng.fl_str_mv |
Electronic governance Small enterprises Technological change |
description |
ilustraciones |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-02T01:46:51Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-02T01:46:51Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Doctorado |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84410 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84410 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abdel-Fattah, M. A. (2015). Constructing a model for the adoptability of using e-government services in developing countries: the case of Egypt. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(4), 293. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2015.074316 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(2015), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025 Al-Shafi, S. H., & Weerakkody, V. (2010). Factors Affecting E-Government Implementation and Adoption in the State of Qatar. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2010. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042644512Z.00000000030 Al-Sobhi, F., Weerakkody, V., & Kamal, M. M. (2010). An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011028786 AL Athmay, Al. A. A., Fantazy, K., & Kumar, V. (2016). E-government adoption and user’s satisfaction: an empirical investigation. EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2014-0016 AlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services. Journal of Software, 4(6), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.4.6.584-590 Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2016). Innovative Framework for e-Government adoption in Saudi Arabia: A Study from the business sector perspective. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070189 Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2015). Exploring Determinants of Adoption and Higher Utilisation for E-Government: A Study from Business Sector Perspective in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 5(October 2014), 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.15439/2015F257 Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2014). Towards a Comprehensive Model for E-Government Adoption and Utilisation Analysis: The Case of Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F146 Almahamid, S., & Mcadams, A. C. (2010). Determinants of User Continuance Intention to use e-Government. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 3(4), 343–372 Alomar, M. A., & de Visscher, C. (2017). Which Factors Can Affect e‑Public Procurement Adoption by Private Firms? The Case of Belgium. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 15(2), 103–115. Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2012). A Framework for Evaluating Citizens’ Expectations and Satisfaction toward Continued Intention to Use E-Government Services. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012, 273–286. Anastasopoulou, K., & Kokolakis, S. (2013). Exploring citizens’ intention to use e-government services: the role of cultural bias. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.053378 Arendsen, R., Peters, O., ter Hedde, M., & van Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.002 Arendsen, R., & Ter Hedde, M. J. (2009). On the origin of intermediary e-government services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5693 LNCS, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_23 Arendsen, R., & Van De Wijngaert, L. (2011). Government as a launching customer for eInvoicing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6846 LNCS, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_11 Arendsen, R., & van Engers, T. M. (2004). Reduction of the Administrative Burden: An e-Government Perspective. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 3rd IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2004 (Vol. 3183, pp. 200–206). http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=BHJ6V5EJU1DW8P1D Arendsen, R., van Engers, T. M., & Schurink, W. (2008). Adoption of High Impact Governmental eServices: Seduce or Enforce? In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, & E. Ferro (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2008 (Vol. 5184, pp. 73–84). Arendsen, R., Van Engers, T. M., & Schurink, W. (2008). Adoption of high impact governmental eServices: Seduce or enforce? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5184, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9 Arendsen, R., Van Engers, T. M., & Velde, R. (2006). An Empirical Study on Business-to- Government Data Exchange Strategies to Reduce the Administrative Costs for Businesses. In R. Suomi, R. Cabral, J. F. Hampe, A. Heikkilä, J. Järveläinen, & E. Koskivaara (Eds.), Project E-Society: Building Bricks. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (pp. 311–323). Springer, Boston, MA Avgerou, C. (2013). Journal of the Association for Information Systems Social Mechanisms for Causal Explanation in Social Theory Based IS Research. Jais, 14(August), 399–419 Bajwa, D. S., Garcia, J. E., & Mooney, T. (2004). An integrative framework for the assimilation of enterprise resource planning systems: Phases, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(3), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647585 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. Bansal, V., & Shukla, S. (2021). Exploring Big Data Analytics Adoption using Affordance Theory. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information System, 2: ICEIS, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010509801310138 Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D. (2002). Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information and Management, 51(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016 Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2012). Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 363–394. Bharosa, N., Hietbrink, F., Mosterd, L., & Van Oosterhout, R. (2018). Steering the adoption of Standard Business Reporting for cross domain information exchange. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209325 Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., van Wijk, R., de Winne, N., van der Voort, H., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y. hua. (2013). Tapping into existing information flows: The transformation to compliance by design in business-to-government information exchange. Government Information Quarterly, 30(SUPPL. 1), S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.006 Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio- Technical Perspective PART I: THE CAUSES. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32. Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438 Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. E. (2011). In search of mechanisms. Conducting a critical realist data analysis. International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011, 3, 1978–1992. Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191–213. https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/en/publications/task-complexity-affects-information-use(e9266504-71b0-4439-a772-89677cb4e5cf).htm Cardona Madariaga, D. F. (2004). El gobierno electrónico. Una herramienta estratégica de toma de decisiones. Universidad & Empresa, 2((3,4,5)), 20–45. http://www.urosario.edu.co/urosario_files/48/48ff8a54-9e9c-4b9b-bec3-9274276efd6a.pdf Carroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2003). From adoption to use: the process of appropriating a mobile phone. Australiasian Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v10i2.151 Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. The 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d4/bda814f845ea32b985e3a9934d072c782249.pdf Carter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6 Cataldo, A., Almuna, S., Briones, R., Bustos, G., & Mcqueen, R. (2018). IT Diffusion , Implementation and Assimilation in Micro-Businesses – an Exploratory Study Based on a Process Approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research. CCIT, & Fedesarrollo. (2013). Coyuntura TIC: El papel de las TIC en el desarrollo de la pequeña empresa: reflexiones de política a la luz del caso colombiano (p. 35). http://ccit.org.co/content/uploads/El-papel-de-las-TIC-en-el-desarrollo-de-la-peque§a-empresa_reflexiones-de-pol°tica-a-la-luz-del-caso-colombiano-Diciembre-2013-Fedesarrollo.pdf Centro Latinoamericano de Administracion para el Desarrollo. (2007). Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico (p. 25). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0056701.pdf Cherns, A. (1987). Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted. Human Relations, 40(3), 153–162. http://hjb.sagepub.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/content/9/2/183.full.pdf+html Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A RESEARCH MANIFESTO FOR SERVICES SCIENCE. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139945 Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708 Correa Ospina, M. L., Saxena, D., & Díaz Pinzón, B. H. (2021). Mechanisms underpinning the usage of e-government services by businesses: A proposal based on previous empirical research. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 13(2), 154–183. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v13i2.685 Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3) Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements , Media Richness and Structural Design. Mangement Science, 32(5), 554–571 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 de Vaujany, F.-X. (2008). Strategic Alignment: What Else? A Practice Based View of IS Value. Icis. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1323867 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 DIAN. (2018). Factura electrónica. https://www.dian.gov.co/fizcalizacioncontrol/herramienconsulta/FacturaElectronica/Presentacion/Paginas/beneficiosyventajas.aspx Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Theories and Models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3–32. https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/BookChapters/User acceptance.htm Dirección de Gobierno en Línea. (2015). Estudio de cultura de uso de TIC en los colombianos para relacionarse con el Estado - 2015. http://estrategia.gobiernoenlinea.gov.co/623/articles-7913_culturadigital_2015.pdf Dobson, P. J. (2001). The Philosophy of Critical Realism--An Opportunity for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495424958 Döring, M. (2018). How-to Bureaucracy: Administrative Literacy of Citizens. ECPR General Conference 2018, 1–18. Duarte, A. I. M., & Costa, C. J. (2012). Information systems: Life cycle and success. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, October 2018, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2311917.2311923 Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Simintiras, A. C., Lal, B., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). A generalised adoption model for services: A cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Government Information Quarterly, 33, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003 Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 Elkheshin, S., & Saleeb, N. (2016). A Conceptual Model for E-government Adoption in Egypt. 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES), 254–259. Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2018). Determinants of dynamic process of emerging ICT adoption in SMEs – actor network theory perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2018-0019 Fang, Z. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, 10(2), 1–22. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan016377.pdf Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Material- ity and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof Følstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Customer journeys: a systematic literature review. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 196–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-11-2014-0261 Gao, Y. (2013). The Influences of Cognitive Factors and Trust on E-Government Acceptance: Evidence from A Two-Stage Model. Review of Business Information Systems, 17(4), 153–158. Ghazali, N., Mustapha, R. M. R., & Mozie, N. M. (2014). The adoption factors of using e-Government services (Study case in Malaysia). Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering, and Environment (TIME-E), 2014 2nd International Conference On, 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME-E.2014.7011640 Gonzalez Rubio, L. C. (2013). Technology Acceptance , Acceptability and Appropriation in Professional Bureaucracies : the Case of Rfid for Improving Mobile Assets Management in Hospitals (Issue April) [Université De Montréal]. https://publications.polymtl.ca/1119/1/2013_LindaCastro_Gonzalez_Rubio.pdf Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689 Grönlund, A., Hatakka, M., & Ask, A. (2007). Inclusion in the E-Service Society – Investigating Administrative Literacy Requirements for Using E-Services. In M. A. Wimmer, J. Scholl, & A. Gronlund (Eds.), Electronic Government: 6th International Conference (EGOV 2007) (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 216–227). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.02.003 Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2004). Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713–729. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01539 Gunasekaran, A., McGaughey, R. E., Ngai, E. W. T., & Rai, B. K. (2009). E-Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.013 Haag, S., Born, F., Kreuzer, S., & Bernius, S. (2013). Organizational resistance to e-invoicing-results from an empirical investigation among smes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8074 LNCS, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3-24 Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms: An analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambrigde University Press. Heeks, R., & Wall, P. J. (2018). Critical realism and ICT4D research. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12051 Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2012). A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235. Hoddy, E. T. (2019). Critical realism in empirical research: employing techniques from grounded theory methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1503400 Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2012). Identifying factors of e-Government acceptance - A literature review. International Conference on Information Systems. Huang, T., & Yasuda, K. (2014). ERP Life Cycle Models : An Annotated Bibliographic Review ERP. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Manaagement Systems Conference. Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., Chen, K., Tang, K.-Z., & Chou, C.-H. (2012). Buyer acceptance of g2b e-government services. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2096140.2096146 Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., Chen, K., Tang, K. Z., & Chou, C. H. (2011). Buyer acceptance of G2B e-government services: An empirical study of inter-entity supply contracts. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2096140.2096146 Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., & Mahmud, M. (2011). E-government application: an integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111155388 Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485. Irani, Z., Al-sebie, M., Elliman, T., & Brunel, Z. I. (2006). Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of its Location & Importance. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–9. Janneck, M. (2009). Recontextualising Technology in Appropriation Processes. In Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/recontextualising-technology-appropriation-processes/21404 Jansen, J., Wijngaert, L. van de, & Pieterson, W. (2010). Channel choice and source choice of entrepreneurs in a public organizational context: the dutch case. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2010 (Vol. 6228, pp. 144–155). Joseph, B. K., & Du Plessis, T. (2015). Consumers’ awareness of the value of e-Government in Zambia: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 11(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015070101 Joshi, P. R., & Islam, S. (2018). E-government maturity model for sustainable E-government services from the perspective of developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882 Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H. (2010). An Integrative Approach to Inter-Organizational System Implementation and Evaluation: the Case of Government-to -Business. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.694811 Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Swar, B., Zo, H., & Rho, J. J. (2012). E-government service use intentions in Afghanistan: technology adoption and the digital divide in a war-torn country. Information Development, 28(4), 281–299. http://idv.sagepub.com/content/28/4/281 Kindel, K., Ritso, V., & Venesaar, U. (2014). Business satisfaction with E-government services in Baltic sea region. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Databases, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-458-9-217 Kindel, K., Venesaar, U., & Reidolf, M. (2013). Communication channel choice between enterprises and government. Databases and Information Systems VII (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications), 218–231. Kurnia, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2000). The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 295–319. Lai, C. S. K., & Pires, G. (2010). Testing of a Model Evaluating e-Government Portal Acceptance and Satisfaction. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13(1), 35–46. Lallmahomed, M. Z. I., Lallmahomed, N., & Lallmahomed, G. M. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of e-Government services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003 Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. Larsen, K. R., & Eargle, D. (2015). Theories Used in IS Research Wiki. Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 222–230. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X10001346 Leonardi, Paul M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493 Lian, J. W. (2015). Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.005 Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005 Löbel, S., Paulowitsch, B., & Schuppan, T. (2016). Intermediaries in the public sector and the role of information technology. Information Polity, 21(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160387 MACGREGOR, R., BUNKER, D., & WAUGH, P. (1993). Design of Electronic Data Interchange Systems for Small/Medium Enterprises. In 1993 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 151–161). https://doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.1993.593854 Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Pieterson, W. (2019). Channel Choice Complications. Exploring the multiplex nature of citizens’ channel choices. EGOV 2019, 139–151. Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2016a). How to Succeed with Multichannel Management: A Case Study of Cross-Organizational Collaboration Surrounding a Mandatory SelfService Application for Danish Single Parents. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 3(4), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2016100107 Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2016b). Warm Experts in the Age of Mandatory e‑Government: Interaction Among Danish Single Parents Regarding Online Application for Public Benefits. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 14(1), 87–98. Mansoori, K. A. Al, Sarabdeen, J., & Tchantchane, A. L. (2018). Investigating Emirati citizens’ adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model. Information Technology and People, 31(2), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2016-0290 Massal, J., & Sandoval, C. G. (2010). Gobierno electrónico. ¿Estado, ciudadanía y democracia en Internet? Análisis Político, 23(68), 3–25. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47052010000100001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es Milosz, M., & Milosz, E. (2013). Efficiency analysis of electronic channels use to communicate between enterprises and administration. Actual Problems of Economics, 143(5), 409–415. Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Toawards a pluralist methodology. MIS Quarterly, 12(3), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 Mingers, J. (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29841-X Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical Realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795–802. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=89477777&lang=fr&site=ehost-live%5Cnfiles/1863/Mingers-2013-Critical Realism in Information S.pdf Decreto 1151 de 2008, 4 (2008). http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-3643_documento.pdf Ministerio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2017). Primera Gran Encuesta TIC/2017 Estudio de acceso, uso y retos de las TIC en Colombia. http://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/679/articles-74002_cartilla_resumen.pdf Ministerio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2018a). Manual de Gobierno Digital (p. 89). Ministerio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2018b). MiPyme Vive Digital. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/w3-propertyvalue-7235.html Mohd Nawi, M. N., Roslan, S., Salleh, N. A., Zulhumadi, F., & Harun, A. N. (2016). The benefits and challenges of E-procurement implementation: A case study of Malaysian company. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(7Special Issue), 329–332. Molnár, S. (2007). eGovernment in the European Union. Network for Teaching Information Society, July, 58. Munyoka, W., & Maharaj, M. (2017). The effect of UTAUT2 moderator factors on citizens’ intention to adopt e-government: The case of two SADC countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.12 Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 Naggi, R., & Agostini, P. L. (2011). Inter-organizational e-Services from a SME Perspective: A Case Study on e-Invoicing. Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2632-6 Nguyen, H. T., Dang, T. V., Van Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Determinants of e-government service adoption: an empirical study for business registration in Southeast Vietnam. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1805396 Okoli, C. (2012). A Critical Realist Guide to Developing Theory with Systematic Literature Reviews. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2115818 Okoli, C. (2015). The View from Giants’ Shoulders: Developing Theory with Theory-Mining Systematic Literature Reviews. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699362 Olaleye, S. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2017). Companies Resistance and Intention to use Electronic Invoicing in Nigeria. 2017 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON). https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2017.8487863 Oliver, R. L., & Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. Ølnes, S., & Jansen, A. (2015). What is this thing called e-Service? Interoperability challenges in e-Service modelling. EGOV 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9248, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22479-4_15 Orihuela, L., & Toshio, O. (2007). E-Government and E-Governance: Towards a Clarification in the Usage of Both Concepts. In E-governance: A global perspective of a New Paradigm (pp. 26–30). Overdijk, M., & Van Diggelen, W. (2006). Technology appropriation in face-to-face collaborative learning. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 213, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1.1.132.6390&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=11 Ozkan, S., & Kanat, I. E. (2011). e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.007 Panayiotou, N. A., & Stavrou, V. P. (2021). Government to business e-services – A systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101576 Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Pergamon, 13(4), 337–348. Piehler, R., Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2016). An Analysis of Continuity Intentions of eGovernment Portal Users. Public Management Review, 18(2), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.965270 Pieterson, W. (2009). Channel choice: citizens’ channel behavior and public service channel strategy. University of Twente. Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., & Meyliana. (2018). Trust and its impact towards continuance of use in government-to-business online service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3–4), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2018-0008 Porrúa, M. A. (2013). E-Government in Latin America: A Review of the Success in Colombia, Uruguay, and Panama. The Global Information Technology Report 2013, 127–136. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR/2013/GITR_Chapter2.3_2013.pdf Rammea, L., & Grobbelaar, S. S. (2017). The Evaluation of e-Government Implementation. IEEE Africon 2017 Proceedings. Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.002 Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2015). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013). Evaluating alternative theoretical models for examining citizen centric adoption of e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 27–49. Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward developing a unified view. Computers in Human Behavior, 59(2016), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.019 Reddick, C., & Anthopoulos, L. (2014). Interactions with e-government, new digital media and traditional channel choices: Citizen-initiated factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2014-0001 Reddick, C. G., & Roy, J. (2013). Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian survey. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.009 Renaud, K., & van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries Riding the Wave of Technology - SAICSIT ’08, October, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456659.1456684 Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.0017 Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (3rd Editio). Free Press. Roseth, B., Reyes, A., & Santiso, C. (2018). wait no more citizens, red tape, and digital government. Inter-American Development Bank. Rotchanakitumnuai, S. (2009). Electronic Government Service Acceptance: The E-GOV-SAM Aspect of the E-Revenue System. The 9th International Conference on Electronic Business. Salahshour Rad, M., Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, B., & Halina Mohamed Dahlan, B. (2017). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z Salahshour Rad, M., Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, B., & Halina Mohamed Dahlan, B. (2017). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z Sambasivan, M., Wemyss, G. P., & Rose, R. C. (2010). User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Research, 20(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241011032236 Sandoval, C. G. (2011). El Estado en la configuración de la era de la información: Génesis del proceso en la región Andina. Folios, 26, 151–185. Santa, R., MacDonald, J. B., & Ferrer, M. (2019). The role of trust in e-Government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: Lessons from Saudi Arabia in e-G2B. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.007 Saxena, D., & Mcdonagh, J. (2017a). A systematic literature review of the enterprise systems research in leading IS journals(2000-2015). Proceedings of the Twelfth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference, Springfield, Illinois May 18-19, September, 7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318116965 Saxena, D., & Mcdonagh, J. (2017b). Yet Another “List” of Critical Success “Factors” for Enterprise Systems: Review of Empirical Evidence and Suggested Research Directions. UKAIS: 22nd Annual Conference: Ubiquitous Information Systems: Surviving and Thriving in a Connected Society. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2017/66 Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). Routledge. Schwarz, A., Chin, W. W., Hirschheim, R., & Schwarz, C. (2014). Toward a process-based view of information technology acceptance. Journal of Information Technology, 29(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.31 Schwarz, A., & Schwarz, C. (2009). Incorporating Choice into Models of Technology Adoption. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 319. Seo, D. B., Tan, C. W., & Warman, G. (2018). Vendor satisfaction of E-government procurement systems in developing countries: an empirical research in Indonesia. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 554–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1454878 SERES. (2017). Estudio de facturación electrónica en Colombia. SERES. (2021). Colombia: la masificación de la factura electrónica alcanza casi el 80%. https://blog.groupseres.com/latam/colombia-la-masificación-de-la-factura-electrónica-alcanza-casi-el-80 Shao, B., Luo, X. (Robert), & Liao, Q. (2015). Factors influencing e-tax filing adoption intention by business users in China. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 11(4), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2015.071408 Shareef, Mahmud Akhtar, Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. (2014). Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2012-0084 Shareef, Mahmud Akhter, Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2011), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 Soong, K. K., Ahmed, E. M., & Tan, K. S. (2020). Factors influencing Malaysian small and medium enterprises adoption of electronic government procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2019-0066 Sundström, J. (2006). Adoption of Electronic Invoicing in SMEs. Suomi, R. (1992). On the concept of inter-organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8687(92)90006-I Swatman, P. M. C., & Swatman, P. A. (1992). EDI system integration: A definition and literature survey. Information Society, 8(3), 169–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1992.9960119 Tang, H. L., Chung, S. H., & Se, C. W. (2009). Examining the impact of possible antecedents on service usage: An empirical study on Macao e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2009.022595 Teerling, M. L., & Pieterson, W. (2011). How to improve e-government use: An empirical examination of multichannel marketing instruments. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 16(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0213 Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2009). Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303 The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms - E-government Definition. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4752 Thi, L., Lim, H., & Al-Zoubi, M. I. (2014). Estimating influence of TOE factors on E-Government usage: Evidence of Jordanian companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(3), 413–436. Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program. In Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre. Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001 Turner, J. (2002). H.R.2458 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): E-Government Act of 2002. https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/02458 Ulman, M., Jarolímek, J., Vasilenko, A., & Kánská, E. (2012). The evaluation of use and quality of public e-services among enterprises. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4(2), 61–72. United Nations. (2021). E-Government. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/about/unegovdd-framework United Nations. (2022). Reports | Global Survey. Urciuoli, L., Hintsa, J., & Ahokas, J. (2013). Drivers and barriers affecting usage of e-Customs - A global survey with customs administrations using multivariate analysis techniques. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.001 Directiva presidencial N° 10 del 2002, Pub. L. No. 10, 7 (2002). http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-3652_documento.pdf van de Ven, A. H. (1992). SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131013 Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. Van De Wijngaert, L. (2010). A multi-theory approach towards the adoption, use and effects of IT services: The case channel choice in an e-government setting. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2010.5529818 van den Boer, Y., Arendsen, R., & Pieterson, W. (2016). In search of information: Investigating source and channel choices in business-to-government service interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.010 van den Boer, Y., Pieterson, W., Arendsen, R., & De Groot, M. (2014). Source and Channel Choices in Business-to-Government Service Interactions: A Vignette Study. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014, 8653 LNCS, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9 van den Boer, Y., Pieterson, W., Arendsen, R., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Towards a model of source and channel choices in business-to-government service interactions: A structural equation modeling approach. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.002 van den Boer, Y., van de Wijngaert, L., Pieterson, W., & Arendsen, R. (2012). On the interaction of source and channel choice in the government-to- business context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7443 LNCS, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_3 van Velsen, L., van der Geest, T., ter Hedde, M., & Derks, W. (2009). Requirements engineering for e-Government services: A citizen-centric approach and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.007 Vejačka, M. (2018). Acceptance of e-government services by business users: The case of Slovakia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(5), 1409–1417. Velleman, E. M., Nahuis, I., & Van Der Geest, T. (2017). Factors explaining adoption and implementation processes for web accessibility standards within eGovernment systems and organizations. Universal Access in the Information Society, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0449-5 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00163.x Vogl, S., Zartler, U., Schmidt, E. M., & Rieder, I. (2018). Developing an analytical framework for multiple perspective, qualitative longitudinal interviews (MPQLI). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1345149 Wang, H., Doong, H.-S., & Lin, F. (2007). Determinants of E-Government Service Adoption: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2007, 3458–3461. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen’ s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 6(1), 55–64. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2009). Quality Enhancing the Continued Use of E-Government Web Sites: Evidence from E-Citizens of Thailand. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2009092202 Waseda University. (2021). Digital Government Ranking 2021 Survey. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570 Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001 Weiss, A. M. (1994). The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950442 Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. Wirtz, B. W., & Langer, P. F. (2017). Public Multichannel Management – an Integrated Framework of Off- and Online Multichannel Government Services. Public Organization Review, 17(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0356-0 Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., & Daiser, P. (2015). E-Government Portal Characteristics and Individual Appeal: An Examination of E-Government and Citizen Acceptance in the Context of Local Administration Portals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(1), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2014.965082 Witarsyah, D., Sjafrizal, T., MD Fudzee, M. F., & Salamat, M. A. (2017). The Critical Factors Affecting e-Government Adoption in Indonesia: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.1.1614 World Economic Forum. (2016). Global Information Technology Report 2016 - Reports - World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2016/networked-readiness-index/ World Economic Forum. (2022). Network Readinex Index. https://networkreadinessindex.org/country/colombia/ Wynn, J. D., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787–810. Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust, and perceived risk. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0077 Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. In SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307 Zhou, P., & Seah, S. (2015). Factor analysis for public adoption of Mobile Electronic government. In Z. Liu (Ed.), Control Engineering and Information Systems (pp. 487–492). |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
xxvi, 254 páginas |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones |
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ingeniería |
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/2/1055917349.2023.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/3/1055917349.2023.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
da661e34b624be5e8483caaef1f15250 eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a 2cf2f42745d03761a13d9d8a3dfe0df7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814089825469333504 |
spelling |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Díaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helena5041f3ee4748ee2d77c25db171711712600Correa Ospina, Martha Liliana7e6b934242b0eab99ebce3f6c234abd0Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones Gistichttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-4431https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001484994https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martha-Correa-Ohttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZolsMX4AAAAJ&hl=en2023-08-02T01:46:51Z2023-08-02T01:46:51Z2023https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84410Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustracionesGovernments have been undertaking digital transformation for many years to offer new ways of interaction to their constituents. However, they face different challenges to migrate users towards digital channels and electronic documents, which are believed to be more cost-efficient for all. Based on the literature review, it is identified that research has been mainly focused on exploring and validating factors influencing acceptance and adoption of e-government self-service applications, and in general it has been conceived it as static phenomenon. Consequently, there is still a lack of "holistic" understanding of the dynamics of the uptake of e-government services. This thesis presents the research process and the results of a longitudinal critical realist case study conducted in the field of e-government with the aim of understanding the uptake process of inter-organizational e-government services by micro-enterprises. This study moves beyond identifying a list of factors influencing adoption at specific point in time. It offers a mechanism-based explanation, and it captures the processual dynamics of e-government services uptake from microbusinesses perspective in a context of mandatory usage of electronic invoicing. The proposed explanatory theoretical framework for the uptake of inter-organizational e-government services by microbusinesses consists of four phases: information seeking, adoption decision and acquisition, implementation, and use and maintenance. Each stage suggests the presence of mechanisms that interact among them and explain the events that occurred during each phase, and the advance towards the next stage. Eight mechanisms were identified: experience, regulatory, market, intermediation, affordance, expectation, appropriation, and administrative literacy mechanism.El sector público ha venido transformándose digitalmente por varios años para ser más eficiente y ofrecer nuevas formas de interacción a sus usuarios. Sin embargo, los gobiernos afrontan retos para migrar a sus usuarios hacia el uso de canales digitales y de documentos electrónicos, lo cual se cree es más eficiente económicamente tanto para usuarios como para las entidades públicas. Con base en la revisión de la literatura, se identificó que la investigación sobre la adopción y uso de servicios de gobierno electrónico ha estado enfocada en la identificación de factores que favorecen la aceptación y adopción de estos servicios y que se ha considerado desde una perspectiva estática. Como consecuencia, existe una falta de entendimiento holístico sobre las dinámicas de adopción y uso de servicios de gobierno electrónico. Esta tesis, presenta el proceso de investigación y los resultados de un caso de estudio longitudinal bajo el paradigma del realismo crítico, el cual fue llevado a cabo en el área del gobierno electrónico con el fin de entender el proceso de adopción y uso de servicios inter-organizacionales de gobierno electrónico por microempresas. Este estudio va más allá de la identificación de factores que influencian la adopción de servicios electrónicos en un momento particular. Este estudio proporciona una explicación basada en mecanismos y captura las dinámicas del proceso de adopción y uso desde la perspectiva de las microempresas en un contexto de uso obligatorio de facturación electrónica. El modelo propuesto de adopción y uso de servicios inter-organizacionales de gobierno electrónico está formado por cuatro fases: búsqueda de información, decisión de adoptar y adquisición, implementación y uso y mantenimiento. Cada fase sugiere la presencia de mecanismos que interactúan entre ellos para explicar los eventos ocurridos en cada fase y el avance hacia la siguiente fase. Ocho mecanismos fueron identificados: mecanismo de expectative, mecanismo regulatorio, de mercado, de Intermediación, affordance, de expectativa, de apropiación y de conocimiento administrativo. (Texto tomado de la fuente).DoctoradoDoctor en IngenieríaOntological and epistemological perspectives of Critical Realism (CR) were assumed for this research and based on them methodological decisions were made. Multimethodology from Mingers (2006) served as a framework to guide the stages of a CR research. Due to the processual view taken in this research, which also implies to explain why of businesses actions. “Abductive approach”, allows to take into account previous research and also empirical data. Coding in combination with two levels of analysis (inner and outer context of the organization, and social and technical aspects) are used for the identification of mechanisms that would explain events of interest, such as decisions made during the uptake process of inter-organizational services by microbusinessesSistemas y Gestión de la Tecnología, la Información, el Conocimiento y la Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria y las Organizacionesxxvi, 254 páginasapplication/pdfengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y OrganizacionesFacultad de IngenieríaBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalIOSE-governmentE-invoicingE-servicesCritical realismMechanismsGobierno electrónicoServicio electrónicoSistemas inter-organizacionalesFactura electrónicaRealismo críticoMecanismosGobierno electrónicoPequeña empresaCambio tecnológicoElectronic governanceSmall enterprisesTechnological changeInter-organizational e-government services uptake: micro-businesses perspectiveAdopción de servicios interorganizacionales de gobierno electrónico: perspectiva de la microempresaTrabajo de grado - Doctoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDAbdel-Fattah, M. A. (2015). Constructing a model for the adoptability of using e-government services in developing countries: the case of Egypt. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(4), 293. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2015.074316Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TAl-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(2015), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025Al-Shafi, S. H., & Weerakkody, V. (2010). Factors Affecting E-Government Implementation and Adoption in the State of Qatar. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2010. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042644512Z.00000000030Al-Sobhi, F., Weerakkody, V., & Kamal, M. M. (2010). An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011028786AL Athmay, Al. A. A., Fantazy, K., & Kumar, V. (2016). E-government adoption and user’s satisfaction: an empirical investigation. EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2014-0016AlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services. Journal of Software, 4(6), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.4.6.584-590Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2016). Innovative Framework for e-Government adoption in Saudi Arabia: A Study from the business sector perspective. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070189Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2015). Exploring Determinants of Adoption and Higher Utilisation for E-Government: A Study from Business Sector Perspective in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 5(October 2014), 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.15439/2015F257Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. (2014). Towards a Comprehensive Model for E-Government Adoption and Utilisation Analysis: The Case of Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.15439/2014F146Almahamid, S., & Mcadams, A. C. (2010). Determinants of User Continuance Intention to use e-Government. Int. J. Electronic Governance, 3(4), 343–372Alomar, M. A., & de Visscher, C. (2017). Which Factors Can Affect e‑Public Procurement Adoption by Private Firms? The Case of Belgium. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 15(2), 103–115.Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2012). A Framework for Evaluating Citizens’ Expectations and Satisfaction toward Continued Intention to Use E-Government Services. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012, 273–286.Anastasopoulou, K., & Kokolakis, S. (2013). Exploring citizens’ intention to use e-government services: the role of cultural bias. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.053378Arendsen, R., Peters, O., ter Hedde, M., & van Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.002Arendsen, R., & Ter Hedde, M. J. (2009). On the origin of intermediary e-government services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5693 LNCS, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_23Arendsen, R., & Van De Wijngaert, L. (2011). Government as a launching customer for eInvoicing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6846 LNCS, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_11Arendsen, R., & van Engers, T. M. (2004). Reduction of the Administrative Burden: An e-Government Perspective. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 3rd IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2004 (Vol. 3183, pp. 200–206). http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=BHJ6V5EJU1DW8P1DArendsen, R., van Engers, T. M., & Schurink, W. (2008). Adoption of High Impact Governmental eServices: Seduce or Enforce? In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, & E. Ferro (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2008 (Vol. 5184, pp. 73–84).Arendsen, R., Van Engers, T. M., & Schurink, W. (2008). Adoption of high impact governmental eServices: Seduce or enforce? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5184, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9Arendsen, R., Van Engers, T. M., & Velde, R. (2006). An Empirical Study on Business-to- Government Data Exchange Strategies to Reduce the Administrative Costs for Businesses. In R. Suomi, R. Cabral, J. F. Hampe, A. Heikkilä, J. Järveläinen, & E. Koskivaara (Eds.), Project E-Society: Building Bricks. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (pp. 311–323). Springer, Boston, MAAvgerou, C. (2013). Journal of the Association for Information Systems Social Mechanisms for Causal Explanation in Social Theory Based IS Research. Jais, 14(August), 399–419Bajwa, D. S., Garcia, J. E., & Mooney, T. (2004). An integrative framework for the assimilation of enterprise resource planning systems: Phases, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(3), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647585Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.Bansal, V., & Shukla, S. (2021). Exploring Big Data Analytics Adoption using Affordance Theory. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information System, 2: ICEIS, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010509801310138Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D. (2002). Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14.Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information and Management, 51(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2012). Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 363–394.Bharosa, N., Hietbrink, F., Mosterd, L., & Van Oosterhout, R. (2018). Steering the adoption of Standard Business Reporting for cross domain information exchange. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209325Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., van Wijk, R., de Winne, N., van der Voort, H., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y. hua. (2013). Tapping into existing information flows: The transformation to compliance by design in business-to-government information exchange. Government Information Quarterly, 30(SUPPL. 1), S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.006Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio- Technical Perspective PART I: THE CAUSES. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32.Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. E. (2011). In search of mechanisms. Conducting a critical realist data analysis. International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011, 3, 1978–1992.Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191–213. https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/en/publications/task-complexity-affects-information-use(e9266504-71b0-4439-a772-89677cb4e5cf).htmCardona Madariaga, D. F. (2004). El gobierno electrónico. Una herramienta estratégica de toma de decisiones. Universidad & Empresa, 2((3,4,5)), 20–45. http://www.urosario.edu.co/urosario_files/48/48ff8a54-9e9c-4b9b-bec3-9274276efd6a.pdfCarroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2003). From adoption to use: the process of appropriating a mobile phone. Australiasian Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v10i2.151Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. The 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d4/bda814f845ea32b985e3a9934d072c782249.pdfCarter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6Cataldo, A., Almuna, S., Briones, R., Bustos, G., & Mcqueen, R. (2018). IT Diffusion , Implementation and Assimilation in Micro-Businesses – an Exploratory Study Based on a Process Approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research.CCIT, & Fedesarrollo. (2013). Coyuntura TIC: El papel de las TIC en el desarrollo de la pequeña empresa: reflexiones de política a la luz del caso colombiano (p. 35). http://ccit.org.co/content/uploads/El-papel-de-las-TIC-en-el-desarrollo-de-la-peque§a-empresa_reflexiones-de-pol°tica-a-la-luz-del-caso-colombiano-Diciembre-2013-Fedesarrollo.pdfCentro Latinoamericano de Administracion para el Desarrollo. (2007). Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico (p. 25). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0056701.pdfCherns, A. (1987). Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted. Human Relations, 40(3), 153–162. http://hjb.sagepub.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/content/9/2/183.full.pdf+htmlChesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A RESEARCH MANIFESTO FOR SERVICES SCIENCE. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139945Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708Correa Ospina, M. L., Saxena, D., & Díaz Pinzón, B. H. (2021). Mechanisms underpinning the usage of e-government services by businesses: A proposal based on previous empirical research. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 13(2), 154–183. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v13i2.685Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3)Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements , Media Richness and Structural Design. Mangement Science, 32(5), 554–571Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008de Vaujany, F.-X. (2008). Strategic Alignment: What Else? A Practice Based View of IS Value. Icis. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1323867DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748DIAN. (2018). Factura electrónica. https://www.dian.gov.co/fizcalizacioncontrol/herramienconsulta/FacturaElectronica/Presentacion/Paginas/beneficiosyventajas.aspxDillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Theories and Models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3–32. https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/BookChapters/User acceptance.htmDirección de Gobierno en Línea. (2015). Estudio de cultura de uso de TIC en los colombianos para relacionarse con el Estado - 2015. http://estrategia.gobiernoenlinea.gov.co/623/articles-7913_culturadigital_2015.pdfDobson, P. J. (2001). The Philosophy of Critical Realism--An Opportunity for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011495424958Döring, M. (2018). How-to Bureaucracy: Administrative Literacy of Citizens. ECPR General Conference 2018, 1–18.Duarte, A. I. M., & Costa, C. J. (2012). Information systems: Life cycle and success. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, October 2018, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2311917.2311923Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Simintiras, A. C., Lal, B., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). A generalised adoption model for services: A cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Government Information Quarterly, 33, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001Elkheshin, S., & Saleeb, N. (2016). A Conceptual Model for E-government Adoption in Egypt. 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES), 254–259.Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2018). Determinants of dynamic process of emerging ICT adoption in SMEs – actor network theory perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2018-0019Fang, Z. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, 10(2), 1–22. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan016377.pdfFaraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Material- ity and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprofFølstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Customer journeys: a systematic literature review. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 196–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-11-2014-0261Gao, Y. (2013). The Influences of Cognitive Factors and Trust on E-Government Acceptance: Evidence from A Two-Stage Model. Review of Business Information Systems, 17(4), 153–158.Ghazali, N., Mustapha, R. M. R., & Mozie, N. M. (2014). The adoption factors of using e-Government services (Study case in Malaysia). Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering, and Environment (TIME-E), 2014 2nd International Conference On, 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME-E.2014.7011640Gonzalez Rubio, L. C. (2013). Technology Acceptance , Acceptability and Appropriation in Professional Bureaucracies : the Case of Rfid for Improving Mobile Assets Management in Hospitals (Issue April) [Université De Montréal]. https://publications.polymtl.ca/1119/1/2013_LindaCastro_Gonzalez_Rubio.pdfGoodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689Grönlund, A., Hatakka, M., & Ask, A. (2007). Inclusion in the E-Service Society – Investigating Administrative Literacy Requirements for Using E-Services. In M. A. Wimmer, J. Scholl, & A. Gronlund (Eds.), Electronic Government: 6th International Conference (EGOV 2007) (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 216–227). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.02.003Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2004). Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713–729. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01539Gunasekaran, A., McGaughey, R. E., Ngai, E. W. T., & Rai, B. K. (2009). E-Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.013Haag, S., Born, F., Kreuzer, S., & Bernius, S. (2013). Organizational resistance to e-invoicing-results from an empirical investigation among smes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8074 LNCS, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3-24Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms: An analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambrigde University Press.Heeks, R., & Wall, P. J. (2018). Critical realism and ICT4D research. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12051Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2012). A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235.Hoddy, E. T. (2019). Critical realism in empirical research: employing techniques from grounded theory methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1503400Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2012). Identifying factors of e-Government acceptance - A literature review. International Conference on Information Systems.Huang, T., & Yasuda, K. (2014). ERP Life Cycle Models : An Annotated Bibliographic Review ERP. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Manaagement Systems Conference.Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., Chen, K., Tang, K.-Z., & Chou, C.-H. (2012). Buyer acceptance of g2b e-government services. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2096140.2096146Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., Chen, K., Tang, K. Z., & Chou, C. H. (2011). Buyer acceptance of G2B e-government services: An empirical study of inter-entity supply contracts. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2096140.2096146Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., & Mahmud, M. (2011). E-government application: an integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111155388Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.Irani, Z., Al-sebie, M., Elliman, T., & Brunel, Z. I. (2006). Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of its Location & Importance. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–9.Janneck, M. (2009). Recontextualising Technology in Appropriation Processes. In Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/recontextualising-technology-appropriation-processes/21404Jansen, J., Wijngaert, L. van de, & Pieterson, W. (2010). Channel choice and source choice of entrepreneurs in a public organizational context: the dutch case. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2010 (Vol. 6228, pp. 144–155).Joseph, B. K., & Du Plessis, T. (2015). Consumers’ awareness of the value of e-Government in Zambia: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 11(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015070101Joshi, P. R., & Islam, S. (2018). E-government maturity model for sustainable E-government services from the perspective of developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H. (2010). An Integrative Approach to Inter-Organizational System Implementation and Evaluation: the Case of Government-to -Business. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.694811Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Swar, B., Zo, H., & Rho, J. J. (2012). E-government service use intentions in Afghanistan: technology adoption and the digital divide in a war-torn country. Information Development, 28(4), 281–299. http://idv.sagepub.com/content/28/4/281Kindel, K., Ritso, V., & Venesaar, U. (2014). Business satisfaction with E-government services in Baltic sea region. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Databases, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-458-9-217Kindel, K., Venesaar, U., & Reidolf, M. (2013). Communication channel choice between enterprises and government. Databases and Information Systems VII (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications), 218–231.Kurnia, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2000). The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 295–319.Lai, C. S. K., & Pires, G. (2010). Testing of a Model Evaluating e-Government Portal Acceptance and Satisfaction. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13(1), 35–46.Lallmahomed, M. Z. I., Lallmahomed, N., & Lallmahomed, G. M. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of e-Government services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.Larsen, K. R., & Eargle, D. (2015). Theories Used in IS Research Wiki.Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 222–230. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X10001346Leonardi, Paul M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493Lian, J. W. (2015). Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.005Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005Löbel, S., Paulowitsch, B., & Schuppan, T. (2016). Intermediaries in the public sector and the role of information technology. Information Polity, 21(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160387MACGREGOR, R., BUNKER, D., & WAUGH, P. (1993). Design of Electronic Data Interchange Systems for Small/Medium Enterprises. In 1993 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 151–161). https://doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.1993.593854Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Pieterson, W. (2019). Channel Choice Complications. Exploring the multiplex nature of citizens’ channel choices. EGOV 2019, 139–151.Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2016a). How to Succeed with Multichannel Management: A Case Study of Cross-Organizational Collaboration Surrounding a Mandatory SelfService Application for Danish Single Parents. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 3(4), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2016100107Madsen, C. Ø., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2016b). Warm Experts in the Age of Mandatory e‑Government: Interaction Among Danish Single Parents Regarding Online Application for Public Benefits. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 14(1), 87–98.Mansoori, K. A. Al, Sarabdeen, J., & Tchantchane, A. L. (2018). Investigating Emirati citizens’ adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model. Information Technology and People, 31(2), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2016-0290Massal, J., & Sandoval, C. G. (2010). Gobierno electrónico. ¿Estado, ciudadanía y democracia en Internet? Análisis Político, 23(68), 3–25. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47052010000100001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=esMilosz, M., & Milosz, E. (2013). Efficiency analysis of electronic channels use to communicate between enterprises and administration. Actual Problems of Economics, 143(5), 409–415.Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: Toawards a pluralist methodology. MIS Quarterly, 12(3), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709Mingers, J. (2006). Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29841-XMingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical Realism in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795–802. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=89477777&lang=fr&site=ehost-live%5Cnfiles/1863/Mingers-2013-Critical Realism in Information S.pdfDecreto 1151 de 2008, 4 (2008). http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-3643_documento.pdfMinisterio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2017). Primera Gran Encuesta TIC/2017 Estudio de acceso, uso y retos de las TIC en Colombia. http://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/679/articles-74002_cartilla_resumen.pdfMinisterio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2018a). Manual de Gobierno Digital (p. 89).Ministerio de Tecnologías de Información y las Comunicaciones. (2018b). MiPyme Vive Digital. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/w3-propertyvalue-7235.htmlMohd Nawi, M. N., Roslan, S., Salleh, N. A., Zulhumadi, F., & Harun, A. N. (2016). The benefits and challenges of E-procurement implementation: A case study of Malaysian company. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(7Special Issue), 329–332.Molnár, S. (2007). eGovernment in the European Union. Network for Teaching Information Society, July, 58.Munyoka, W., & Maharaj, M. (2017). The effect of UTAUT2 moderator factors on citizens’ intention to adopt e-government: The case of two SADC countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.12Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001Naggi, R., & Agostini, P. L. (2011). Inter-organizational e-Services from a SME Perspective: A Case Study on e-Invoicing. Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2632-6Nguyen, H. T., Dang, T. V., Van Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Determinants of e-government service adoption: an empirical study for business registration in Southeast Vietnam. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1805396Okoli, C. (2012). A Critical Realist Guide to Developing Theory with Systematic Literature Reviews. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2115818Okoli, C. (2015). The View from Giants’ Shoulders: Developing Theory with Theory-Mining Systematic Literature Reviews. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699362Olaleye, S. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2017). Companies Resistance and Intention to use Electronic Invoicing in Nigeria. 2017 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON). https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2017.8487863Oliver, R. L., & Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.Ølnes, S., & Jansen, A. (2015). What is this thing called e-Service? Interoperability challenges in e-Service modelling. EGOV 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9248, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22479-4_15Orihuela, L., & Toshio, O. (2007). E-Government and E-Governance: Towards a Clarification in the Usage of Both Concepts. In E-governance: A global perspective of a New Paradigm (pp. 26–30).Overdijk, M., & Van Diggelen, W. (2006). Technology appropriation in face-to-face collaborative learning. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 213, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1.1.132.6390&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=11Ozkan, S., & Kanat, I. E. (2011). e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.007Panayiotou, N. A., & Stavrou, V. P. (2021). Government to business e-services – A systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101576Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Pergamon, 13(4), 337–348.Piehler, R., Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2016). An Analysis of Continuity Intentions of eGovernment Portal Users. Public Management Review, 18(2), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.965270Pieterson, W. (2009). Channel choice: citizens’ channel behavior and public service channel strategy. University of Twente.Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., & Meyliana. (2018). Trust and its impact towards continuance of use in government-to-business online service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3–4), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2018-0008Porrúa, M. A. (2013). E-Government in Latin America: A Review of the Success in Colombia, Uruguay, and Panama. The Global Information Technology Report 2013, 127–136. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR/2013/GITR_Chapter2.3_2013.pdfRammea, L., & Grobbelaar, S. S. (2017). The Evaluation of e-Government Implementation. IEEE Africon 2017 Proceedings.Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.002Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2015). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-yRana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013). Evaluating alternative theoretical models for examining citizen centric adoption of e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 27–49.Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward developing a unified view. Computers in Human Behavior, 59(2016), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.019Reddick, C., & Anthopoulos, L. (2014). Interactions with e-government, new digital media and traditional channel choices: Citizen-initiated factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2014-0001Reddick, C. G., & Roy, J. (2013). Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian survey. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.009Renaud, K., & van Biljon, J. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries Riding the Wave of Technology - SAICSIT ’08, October, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456659.1456684Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.0017Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (3rd Editio). Free Press.Roseth, B., Reyes, A., & Santiso, C. (2018). wait no more citizens, red tape, and digital government. Inter-American Development Bank.Rotchanakitumnuai, S. (2009). Electronic Government Service Acceptance: The E-GOV-SAM Aspect of the E-Revenue System. The 9th International Conference on Electronic Business.Salahshour Rad, M., Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, B., & Halina Mohamed Dahlan, B. (2017). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-zSalahshour Rad, M., Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, B., & Halina Mohamed Dahlan, B. (2017). Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-zSambasivan, M., Wemyss, G. P., & Rose, R. C. (2010). User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Research, 20(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241011032236Sandoval, C. G. (2011). El Estado en la configuración de la era de la información: Génesis del proceso en la región Andina. Folios, 26, 151–185.Santa, R., MacDonald, J. B., & Ferrer, M. (2019). The role of trust in e-Government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: Lessons from Saudi Arabia in e-G2B. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.007Saxena, D., & Mcdonagh, J. (2017a). A systematic literature review of the enterprise systems research in leading IS journals(2000-2015). Proceedings of the Twelfth Midwest Association for Information Systems Conference, Springfield, Illinois May 18-19, September, 7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318116965Saxena, D., & Mcdonagh, J. (2017b). Yet Another “List” of Critical Success “Factors” for Enterprise Systems: Review of Empirical Evidence and Suggested Research Directions. UKAIS: 22nd Annual Conference: Ubiquitous Information Systems: Surviving and Thriving in a Connected Society. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2017/66Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.Schwarz, A., Chin, W. W., Hirschheim, R., & Schwarz, C. (2014). Toward a process-based view of information technology acceptance. Journal of Information Technology, 29(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.31Schwarz, A., & Schwarz, C. (2009). Incorporating Choice into Models of Technology Adoption. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 319.Seo, D. B., Tan, C. W., & Warman, G. (2018). Vendor satisfaction of E-government procurement systems in developing countries: an empirical research in Indonesia. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 554–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1454878SERES. (2017). Estudio de facturación electrónica en Colombia.SERES. (2021). Colombia: la masificación de la factura electrónica alcanza casi el 80%. https://blog.groupseres.com/latam/colombia-la-masificación-de-la-factura-electrónica-alcanza-casi-el-80Shao, B., Luo, X. (Robert), & Liao, Q. (2015). Factors influencing e-tax filing adoption intention by business users in China. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 11(4), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2015.071408Shareef, Mahmud Akhtar, Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. (2014). Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2012-0084Shareef, Mahmud Akhter, Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2011), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006Soong, K. K., Ahmed, E. M., & Tan, K. S. (2020). Factors influencing Malaysian small and medium enterprises adoption of electronic government procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2019-0066Sundström, J. (2006). Adoption of Electronic Invoicing in SMEs.Suomi, R. (1992). On the concept of inter-organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8687(92)90006-ISwatman, P. M. C., & Swatman, P. A. (1992). EDI system integration: A definition and literature survey. Information Society, 8(3), 169–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.1992.9960119Tang, H. L., Chung, S. H., & Se, C. W. (2009). Examining the impact of possible antecedents on service usage: An empirical study on Macao e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2009.022595Teerling, M. L., & Pieterson, W. (2011). How to improve e-government use: An empirical examination of multichannel marketing instruments. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 16(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0213Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2009). Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms - E-government Definition. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4752Thi, L., Lim, H., & Al-Zoubi, M. I. (2014). Estimating influence of TOE factors on E-Government usage: Evidence of Jordanian companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(3), 413–436.Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program. In Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001Turner, J. (2002). H.R.2458 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): E-Government Act of 2002. https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/02458Ulman, M., Jarolímek, J., Vasilenko, A., & Kánská, E. (2012). The evaluation of use and quality of public e-services among enterprises. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4(2), 61–72.United Nations. (2021). E-Government. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/about/unegovdd-frameworkUnited Nations. (2022). Reports | Global Survey.Urciuoli, L., Hintsa, J., & Ahokas, J. (2013). Drivers and barriers affecting usage of e-Customs - A global survey with customs administrations using multivariate analysis techniques. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.001Directiva presidencial N° 10 del 2002, Pub. L. No. 10, 7 (2002). http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-3652_documento.pdfvan de Ven, A. H. (1992). SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131013Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.Van De Wijngaert, L. (2010). A multi-theory approach towards the adoption, use and effects of IT services: The case channel choice in an e-government setting. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2010.5529818van den Boer, Y., Arendsen, R., & Pieterson, W. (2016). In search of information: Investigating source and channel choices in business-to-government service interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.010van den Boer, Y., Pieterson, W., Arendsen, R., & De Groot, M. (2014). Source and Channel Choices in Business-to-Government Service Interactions: A Vignette Study. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014, 8653 LNCS, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9van den Boer, Y., Pieterson, W., Arendsen, R., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Towards a model of source and channel choices in business-to-government service interactions: A structural equation modeling approach. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.002van den Boer, Y., van de Wijngaert, L., Pieterson, W., & Arendsen, R. (2012). On the interaction of source and channel choice in the government-to- business context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7443 LNCS, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_3van Velsen, L., van der Geest, T., ter Hedde, M., & Derks, W. (2009). Requirements engineering for e-Government services: A citizen-centric approach and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.007Vejačka, M. (2018). Acceptance of e-government services by business users: The case of Slovakia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(5), 1409–1417.Velleman, E. M., Nahuis, I., & Van Der Geest, T. (2017). Factors explaining adoption and implementation processes for web accessibility standards within eGovernment systems and organizations. Universal Access in the Information Society, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0449-5Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00163.xVogl, S., Zartler, U., Schmidt, E. M., & Rieder, I. (2018). Developing an analytical framework for multiple perspective, qualitative longitudinal interviews (MPQLI). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1345149Wang, H., Doong, H.-S., & Lin, F. (2007). Determinants of E-Government Service Adoption: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2007, 3458–3461.Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen’ s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 6(1), 55–64.Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2009). Quality Enhancing the Continued Use of E-Government Web Sites: Evidence from E-Citizens of Thailand. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2009092202Waseda University. (2021). Digital Government Ranking 2021 Survey.Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001Weiss, A. M. (1994). The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950442Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.Wirtz, B. W., & Langer, P. F. (2017). Public Multichannel Management – an Integrated Framework of Off- and Online Multichannel Government Services. Public Organization Review, 17(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0356-0Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., & Daiser, P. (2015). E-Government Portal Characteristics and Individual Appeal: An Examination of E-Government and Citizen Acceptance in the Context of Local Administration Portals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(1), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2014.965082Witarsyah, D., Sjafrizal, T., MD Fudzee, M. F., & Salamat, M. A. (2017). The Critical Factors Affecting e-Government Adoption in Indonesia: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.1.1614World Economic Forum. (2016). Global Information Technology Report 2016 - Reports - World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2016/networked-readiness-index/World Economic Forum. (2022). Network Readinex Index. https://networkreadinessindex.org/country/colombia/Wynn, J. D., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787–810.Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust, and perceived risk. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0077Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. In SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9eZammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307Zhou, P., & Seah, S. (2015). Factor analysis for public adoption of Mobile Electronic government. In Z. Liu (Ed.), Control Engineering and Information Systems (pp. 487–492).MinCienciasEstudiantesInvestigadoresResponsables políticosORIGINAL1055917349.2023.pdf1055917349.2023.pdfTesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizacionesapplication/pdf4098717https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/2/1055917349.2023.pdfda661e34b624be5e8483caaef1f15250MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51THUMBNAIL1055917349.2023.pdf.jpg1055917349.2023.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4669https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84410/3/1055917349.2023.pdf.jpg2cf2f42745d03761a13d9d8a3dfe0df7MD53unal/84410oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/844102023-08-14 23:04:04.662Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |