El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein
ilustraciones, gráficas
- Autores:
-
Vargas Morales, Juan David
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/82965
- Palabra clave:
- 100 - Filosofía y Psicología::101 - Teoría de la filosofía
160 - Lógica::162 - Deducción
Notación lógica
Signo
Símbolo
Begriffsschrift
logical notation
Sign
Symbol
Lógica
Lenguaje simbólico
Semiología
Logic
Symbolic languages
Semiology
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_6f932524ee45d1cf374bb0d1138e2781 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/82965 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
The concept of Notation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicus |
| title |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| spellingShingle |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein 100 - Filosofía y Psicología::101 - Teoría de la filosofía 160 - Lógica::162 - Deducción Notación lógica Signo Símbolo Begriffsschrift logical notation Sign Symbol Lógica Lenguaje simbólico Semiología Logic Symbolic languages Semiology |
| title_short |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| title_full |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| title_fullStr |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| title_sort |
El concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de Wittgenstein |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Vargas Morales, Juan David |
| dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ramos Arenas, Jaime |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Vargas Morales, Juan David |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
100 - Filosofía y Psicología::101 - Teoría de la filosofía 160 - Lógica::162 - Deducción |
| topic |
100 - Filosofía y Psicología::101 - Teoría de la filosofía 160 - Lógica::162 - Deducción Notación lógica Signo Símbolo Begriffsschrift logical notation Sign Symbol Lógica Lenguaje simbólico Semiología Logic Symbolic languages Semiology |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Notación lógica Signo Símbolo |
| dc.subject.proposal.deu.fl_str_mv |
Begriffsschrift |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
logical notation Sign Symbol |
| dc.subject.unesco.spa.fl_str_mv |
Lógica Lenguaje simbólico Semiología |
| dc.subject.unesco.eng.fl_str_mv |
Logic Symbolic languages Semiology |
| description |
ilustraciones, gráficas |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-17T00:45:10Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-17T00:45:10Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82965 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82965 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Hutchinson University Library. Boghossian, P. (2008). Epistemic Norms. The Journal of Philosophy, 105 (9), 472-500. Bronzo, S. (2017). Wittgenstein, Theories of Meaning, and Linguistic Disjunctivism. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1340–1363. Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. En E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein (pp. 374-462). Oxford University Press. Burnyeat, M. (2001). A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Mathesis Publications. Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. En E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein (pp. 374-462). Oxford University Press. Conant, J. (2020a). Wittgenstein’s Critique of the Additive Conception of Language. Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 9(1), 7–36. Conant, J. (2020b). Reply to Gustafsson: Wittgenstein on the Relation of Sign to Symbol. En S. Miguens (Ed.), The Logical Alien: Conant and His Critics (pp. 863-948). Harvard University Press. Diamond, C. (1991). The Realistic Spirit. MIT Press. Dummett, M. (2003). Frege and Other Philosophers. Clarendon. Frege, G. (1950). The Foundations of Arithmetic. Harper Torchbooks. Frege, G., & Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual Notation and related articles. Oxford University Press. Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous Writings. Basil Blackwell. Frege, G. (1998). Ensayos de semántica y filosofía de la lógica. Tecnos. Frege, G. (2016). Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Derived Using Concept-script. Volumes I & II. Oxford University Press. Glock, H.-J. (2004). All Kinds of Nonsense. En E. Ammereller y E. Fisher (Eds.). Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations (pp. 221-245). Routledge. Goldfarb, W. (1997). Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond's The Realistic Spirit. Journal of Philosophical Research, 22, 58-73. Goldfarb, W. (2001). Frege’s Conception of Logic. En J. Floyd y S. Shieh (Eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy (pp. 25-43). Oxford University Press. Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and Illusion (Revised Ed.). Clarendon Press. Hacker, P. M. S. (1999). Naming, Thinking and Meaning in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 22(2), 119-135. Heijenoort, J. (1967). Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language. Synthese, 17(3), 324-330. Hintikka, J. (1996). Ludwig Wittgenstein Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths. Kluwer. Hintikka, J. (1997). Lingua universalis vs. Calculus ratiocinator: An ultimate presupposition of twentieth-century philosophy. Kluwer. Johnston, C. (2007). Symbols in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy, 15(3), 367-394. Kenny, A. (2006). Wittgenstein. Blackwell Pub. Kuusela, O. (2019). Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy. Re-examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. Kuusela, O. (2021). Wittgenstein’s Grundgedanke as the Key to the Tractatus. Teorema, 40(2), 83-99. Lampert, T. (2017). Wittgenstein’s ab-Notation: An Iconic Proof Procedure. History and Philosophy of Logic, 38(3), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1312222 Landini, G. (2007). Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge University Press. Malcolm, N. (1986). Nothing is Hidden: Wittgenstein’s Criticism of his Early Thought. Blackwell. Mezzadri, D. (2010). Language and Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicus [tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Stirling]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47426112_Language_and_Logic_in_Wittgenstein%27s_Tractatus_Logico-Philosophicus McGuinness, B. (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein. Routledge. McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s early philosophy of logic and language. Clarendon Press. Morris, M. (2008). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge. Nir, Gilad. (2021). Are Rules of Inference Superfluous? Wittgenstein vs. Frege and Russell. Teorema, 40(2), 45-61. Pears, D. (1987). The False Prison (Vol. 1). Clarendon Press. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press. Potter, M. (2008). Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford University Press. Potter, M. (2009). The Logic of the Tractatus. En D. M. Gabbay y J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 5 (pp. 255-304). Elsevier. Proops, I. (2001). Tractatus on Inference and Entailment. En Erich Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Essays on Early Analytic Philosophy (pp. 283–307). Oxford University Press. Ricketts, T. (1985). Frege, the Tractatus, and the Logocentric Predicament. Noûs, 19(1), 3-15. Russell, B. (2008). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Spokesman. Russell, B. (2009). Our Knowledge of the External World. Routledge. Russell, B. (2010). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Routledge Sluga, H. (1980). Gottlob Frege: The Arguments of the Philosophers. Routledge. Stenius, E. (1964). Wittgenstein' s Tractatus, A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought. Basil Blackwell. Stenlund, S. (2018). Frege’s Critique of Formalism. En G. Bengtsson, S. Säätelä y A. Pichler (Eds.), New Essays on Frege: Between Science and Literature (pp. 75-87). Springer. Sullivan, P. (2004). Frege's Logic. En A. Kanamori, D. M. Gabbay y J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 3 (pp. 659-751). Elsevier. Winch, P. (1987). Trying to Make Sense. Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L (1973). Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Alianza. Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G. E. M., y Wright, G. H. von. (1961). Notebooks 1914-1916. Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L. (2003). Sobre la certeza. Gedisa. Wittgenstein, L., Waismann, F., & Baker, G. P. (2013). The voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna circle. Routledge. |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
112 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Filosofía |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá, Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/2/1032463916.2022.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/3/1032463916.2022.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a 436631ad013a0256299371461c98eafb efc37318d6a346161a9c38ee4a3f1015 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814089962292772864 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Ramos Arenas, Jaimed446e68faa0a392eead03cbc7ac81ba1600Vargas Morales, Juan David48ca517a306f9677a5294d5a5675ed232023-01-17T00:45:10Z2023-01-17T00:45:10Z2022-12https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82965Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, gráficasEn una nota póstuma de 1929, Wittgenstein afirma que una notación lógica es “la expresión última de una concepción filosófica” (MS 105, 10–12). La tesis presenta una investigación del concepto de notación lógica en el Tractatus lógico-philosophicus (TLP) y una propuesta interpretativa de dos aspectos de la obra que concuerda con dicha afirmación. En primer lugar, la tesis sostiene que una de las notaciones propuestas por el TLP: la notación-VF (notación-ab en las Notas de Lógica), puede ser entendida como la expresión de la concepción de la lógica que Wittgenstein opone a las filosofías de Frege y Russell: la lógica no es una ciencia y sus enunciados son tautologías. En segundo lugar, la tesis sostiene que la comprensión wittgensteiniana del funcionamiento de la notación-VF está fundamentada en su distinción entre signo y símbolo. Para el Wittgenstein del TLP, un símbolo es una forma lógica común a una clase de proposiciones, mientras que el signo es el aspecto perceptual de un símbolo. Mi interpretación plantea que hay una relación interna entre símbolos y signos. Es esencial a un símbolo tener un aspecto perceptual (no hay pensamiento sin expresión lingüística). Es esencial al signo tener cierto tipo de relación intrínseca con un símbolo (sin símbolo, solo hay manchas sobre el papel y no hay lenguaje). De acuerdo con tal distinción, Wittgenstein sostiene que en su notación lógica las condiciones de identificación de los signos son idénticas a las condiciones de identificación de los símbolos. Si esto es así, la notación-VF también sería la expresión particular de una concepción filosófica, típicamente atribuida tan solo al Wittgenstein de las Investigaciones, acerca de la necesaria materialidad y temporalidad del pensamiento y el lenguaje. (Texto tomado de la fuente).In a remark from 1929, Wittgenstein claims that a logical notation is “the last expression of a philosophical view” (MS 105, 10–12). The thesis offers an investigation of the concept of logical notation in the Tractatus lógico-philosophicus (TLP) and an interpretative proposal of two aspects of this work that are consistent with such remark. On the one hand, the tesis argues that one of the proposed notations of the TLP: the TF-notation (ab-notation on Notes on Logic) can be understood as the expression of the logical view that Wittgenstein opposes to the philosophies of Frege and Russel: logic is not a science and logical statements are tautologies. Secondly, the thesis argues that Wittgenstein’s understanding of the workings of the TF-notation is grounded in his sign-symbol distinction. In the TLP, a symbol is a logical form common to a set of propopositions, while the sign is the perceptual aspect of a symbol. It is essential to a symbol to have a perceptual aspecto (there is no thought without linguistic expression). It is essential to a sign to have an intrinsic relationship with a symbol (withouth symbols there are just stains on paper and no language). According to the distinction so understood, Wittgenstein holds that in his logical notation the conditions for identifying the signs are identical to the conditions for identifying the symbols. If this is so, then the TF-notation is also an expression of a philosophical view, most commonly attributed to Wittgenstein’s Investigations, about the necessary materiality and temporality of thought and language.MaestríaMagíster en FilosofíaFilosofía del lenguaje, historia y filosofía de la lógica112 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en FilosofíaFacultad de Ciencias HumanasBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá100 - Filosofía y Psicología::101 - Teoría de la filosofía160 - Lógica::162 - DeducciónNotación lógicaSignoSímboloBegriffsschriftlogical notationSignSymbolLógicaLenguaje simbólicoSemiologíaLogicSymbolic languagesSemiologyEl concepto de notación en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus de WittgensteinThe concept of Notation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicusTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMAnscombe, G. E. M. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Hutchinson University Library.Boghossian, P. (2008). Epistemic Norms. The Journal of Philosophy, 105 (9), 472-500.Bronzo, S. (2017). Wittgenstein, Theories of Meaning, and Linguistic Disjunctivism. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1340–1363.Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. En E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein (pp. 374-462). Oxford University Press.Burnyeat, M. (2001). A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Mathesis Publications.Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. En E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein (pp. 374-462). Oxford University Press.Conant, J. (2020a). Wittgenstein’s Critique of the Additive Conception of Language. Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 9(1), 7–36.Conant, J. (2020b). Reply to Gustafsson: Wittgenstein on the Relation of Sign to Symbol. En S. Miguens (Ed.), The Logical Alien: Conant and His Critics (pp. 863-948). Harvard University Press.Diamond, C. (1991). The Realistic Spirit. MIT Press.Dummett, M. (2003). Frege and Other Philosophers. Clarendon.Frege, G. (1950). The Foundations of Arithmetic. Harper Torchbooks.Frege, G., & Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual Notation and related articles. Oxford University Press.Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous Writings. Basil Blackwell.Frege, G. (1998). Ensayos de semántica y filosofía de la lógica. Tecnos.Frege, G. (2016). Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Derived Using Concept-script. Volumes I & II. Oxford University Press.Glock, H.-J. (2004). All Kinds of Nonsense. En E. Ammereller y E. Fisher (Eds.). Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations (pp. 221-245). Routledge.Goldfarb, W. (1997). Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond's The Realistic Spirit. Journal of Philosophical Research, 22, 58-73.Goldfarb, W. (2001). Frege’s Conception of Logic. En J. Floyd y S. Shieh (Eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy (pp. 25-43). Oxford University Press.Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and Illusion (Revised Ed.). Clarendon Press.Hacker, P. M. S. (1999). Naming, Thinking and Meaning in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 22(2), 119-135.Heijenoort, J. (1967). Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language. Synthese, 17(3), 324-330.Hintikka, J. (1996). Ludwig Wittgenstein Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths. Kluwer.Hintikka, J. (1997). Lingua universalis vs. Calculus ratiocinator: An ultimate presupposition of twentieth-century philosophy. Kluwer.Johnston, C. (2007). Symbols in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy, 15(3), 367-394.Kenny, A. (2006). Wittgenstein. Blackwell Pub.Kuusela, O. (2019). Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy. Re-examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Kuusela, O. (2021). Wittgenstein’s Grundgedanke as the Key to the Tractatus. Teorema, 40(2), 83-99.Lampert, T. (2017). Wittgenstein’s ab-Notation: An Iconic Proof Procedure. History and Philosophy of Logic, 38(3), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1312222Landini, G. (2007). Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge University Press.Malcolm, N. (1986). Nothing is Hidden: Wittgenstein’s Criticism of his Early Thought. Blackwell.Mezzadri, D. (2010). Language and Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicus [tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Stirling]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47426112_Language_and_Logic_in_Wittgenstein%27s_Tractatus_Logico-PhilosophicusMcGuinness, B. (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein. Routledge.McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s early philosophy of logic and language. Clarendon Press.Morris, M. (2008). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge.Nir, Gilad. (2021). Are Rules of Inference Superfluous? Wittgenstein vs. Frege and Russell. Teorema, 40(2), 45-61.Pears, D. (1987). The False Prison (Vol. 1). Clarendon Press.Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.Potter, M. (2008). Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford University Press.Potter, M. (2009). The Logic of the Tractatus. En D. M. Gabbay y J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 5 (pp. 255-304). Elsevier.Proops, I. (2001). Tractatus on Inference and Entailment. En Erich Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Essays on Early Analytic Philosophy (pp. 283–307). Oxford University Press.Ricketts, T. (1985). Frege, the Tractatus, and the Logocentric Predicament. Noûs, 19(1), 3-15.Russell, B. (2008). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Spokesman.Russell, B. (2009). Our Knowledge of the External World. Routledge.Russell, B. (2010). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. RoutledgeSluga, H. (1980). Gottlob Frege: The Arguments of the Philosophers. Routledge.Stenius, E. (1964). Wittgenstein' s Tractatus, A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought. Basil Blackwell.Stenlund, S. (2018). Frege’s Critique of Formalism. En G. Bengtsson, S. Säätelä y A. Pichler (Eds.), New Essays on Frege: Between Science and Literature (pp. 75-87). Springer.Sullivan, P. (2004). Frege's Logic. En A. Kanamori, D. M. Gabbay y J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 3 (pp. 659-751). Elsevier.Winch, P. (1987). Trying to Make Sense. Basil Blackwell.Wittgenstein, L (1973). Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Alianza.Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G. E. M., y Wright, G. H. von. (1961). Notebooks 1914-1916. Basil Blackwell.Wittgenstein, L. (2003). Sobre la certeza. Gedisa.Wittgenstein, L., Waismann, F., & Baker, G. P. (2013). The voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna circle. Routledge.BibliotecariosEstudiantesInvestigadoresMaestrosPadres y familiasPúblico generalLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51ORIGINAL1032463916.2022.pdf1032463916.2022.pdfTesis de Maestría en Filosofíaapplication/pdf1076439https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/2/1032463916.2022.pdf436631ad013a0256299371461c98eafbMD52THUMBNAIL1032463916.2022.pdf.jpg1032463916.2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3915https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/82965/3/1032463916.2022.pdf.jpgefc37318d6a346161a9c38ee4a3f1015MD53unal/82965oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/829652024-08-15 23:14:09.666Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |