Teacher correction versus peer-marking

Written language is undoubtedly more often used than oral language in a variety of contexts, including both the professional and academic life. Consequently, developing strategies for correcting compositions and improving students’ written production is of vital importance. This article describes an...

Full description

Autores:
Mourente Miguel, Mariana Correia
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2004
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/25289
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/25289
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/16326/
Palabra clave:
English-Teaching
Foreign Language-Teaching Writing
Evaluation
Assessment
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
id UNACIONAL2_4a5a7d2379e2d46ae085c519a8c81205
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/25289
network_acronym_str UNACIONAL2
network_name_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
spelling Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Mourente Miguel, Mariana Correia8ce320c8-bef6-45f2-aac1-13204e4ce9b93002019-06-25T23:13:35Z2019-06-25T23:13:35Z2004https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/25289http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/16326/Written language is undoubtedly more often used than oral language in a variety of contexts, including both the professional and academic life. Consequently, developing strategies for correcting compositions and improving students’ written production is of vital importance. This article describes an experiment aimed at assessing the two most widely used methods of correction for compositions –traditional teacher correction and peer marking and their effect on the frequency of errors. Data was collected by asking students to write and revise a text. Statistical tests were performed to analyse it. At the end of the experiment, it was found that no significant difference in efficiency existed between the two methods, contradicting expectations (cf. Davies, 2002; Levine et al., 2002 and Ward, 2001). Key words: English-Teaching, Foreign Language-Teaching Writing, Evaluation, Assessment El lenguaje escrito es sin duda usado con más frecuencia que el lenguaje oral en una variedad de situaciones o contextos, incluyendo tanto la vida profesional como la académica. En consecuencia, el desarrollo de estrategias para corregir composiciones y mejorar la producción escrita de los estudiantes es de suma importancia. Este artículo describe un experimento cuyo objetivo es evaluar los dos métodos más usados para la corrección de composiciones, la corrección tradicional por el maestro y la corrección por revisión de pares, con respecto a su efecto en la frecuencia de errores. Se recogió información haciendo que estudiantes escribieran y revisaran un texto y sobre esos textos se aplicaron pruebas estadísticas para analizar los errores. Contrario a lo esperado, al final del experimento, no se encontró ninguna diferencia significativa entre los resultados encontrados por los dos métodos, (cfr. Davies, 2002; Levine et al., 2002 y Ward, 2001). Palabras claves: Inglés-Enseñanza, Idioma Extranjero-Enseñanza, Composición, Evaluaciónapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanashttp://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/11211Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional DevelopmentPROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional DevelopmentMourente Miguel, Mariana Correia (2004) Teacher correction versus peer-marking. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development; Vol. 5, núm. 1 (2004): PROFILE 5, NO.1. Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development; 23-28 PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development; Vol. 5, núm. 1 (2004): PROFILE 5, NO.1. Issues in Teach .Teacher correction versus peer-markingArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTEnglish-TeachingForeign Language-Teaching WritingEvaluationAssessmentORIGINAL11211-26982-1-PB.pdfapplication/pdf54038https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/25289/1/11211-26982-1-PB.pdf54bce1d7ee00de572bbf80986cd6aae9MD51THUMBNAIL11211-26982-1-PB.pdf.jpg11211-26982-1-PB.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg7447https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/25289/2/11211-26982-1-PB.pdf.jpg1b9d9ed0383f8e81cd1def9308cbbc4bMD52unal/25289oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/252892023-10-21 23:05:57.515Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Teacher correction versus peer-marking
title Teacher correction versus peer-marking
spellingShingle Teacher correction versus peer-marking
English-Teaching
Foreign Language-Teaching Writing
Evaluation
Assessment
title_short Teacher correction versus peer-marking
title_full Teacher correction versus peer-marking
title_fullStr Teacher correction versus peer-marking
title_full_unstemmed Teacher correction versus peer-marking
title_sort Teacher correction versus peer-marking
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Mourente Miguel, Mariana Correia
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Mourente Miguel, Mariana Correia
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv English-Teaching
Foreign Language-Teaching Writing
Evaluation
Assessment
topic English-Teaching
Foreign Language-Teaching Writing
Evaluation
Assessment
description Written language is undoubtedly more often used than oral language in a variety of contexts, including both the professional and academic life. Consequently, developing strategies for correcting compositions and improving students’ written production is of vital importance. This article describes an experiment aimed at assessing the two most widely used methods of correction for compositions –traditional teacher correction and peer marking and their effect on the frequency of errors. Data was collected by asking students to write and revise a text. Statistical tests were performed to analyse it. At the end of the experiment, it was found that no significant difference in efficiency existed between the two methods, contradicting expectations (cf. Davies, 2002; Levine et al., 2002 and Ward, 2001). Key words: English-Teaching, Foreign Language-Teaching Writing, Evaluation, Assessment El lenguaje escrito es sin duda usado con más frecuencia que el lenguaje oral en una variedad de situaciones o contextos, incluyendo tanto la vida profesional como la académica. En consecuencia, el desarrollo de estrategias para corregir composiciones y mejorar la producción escrita de los estudiantes es de suma importancia. Este artículo describe un experimento cuyo objetivo es evaluar los dos métodos más usados para la corrección de composiciones, la corrección tradicional por el maestro y la corrección por revisión de pares, con respecto a su efecto en la frecuencia de errores. Se recogió información haciendo que estudiantes escribieran y revisaran un texto y sobre esos textos se aplicaron pruebas estadísticas para analizar los errores. Contrario a lo esperado, al final del experimento, no se encontró ninguna diferencia significativa entre los resultados encontrados por los dos métodos, (cfr. Davies, 2002; Levine et al., 2002 y Ward, 2001). Palabras claves: Inglés-Enseñanza, Idioma Extranjero-Enseñanza, Composición, Evaluación
publishDate 2004
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2004
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-25T23:13:35Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-25T23:13:35Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/25289
dc.identifier.eprints.spa.fl_str_mv http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/16326/
url https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/25289
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/16326/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/11211
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development
PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Mourente Miguel, Mariana Correia (2004) Teacher correction versus peer-marking. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development; Vol. 5, núm. 1 (2004): PROFILE 5, NO.1. Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development; 23-28 PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development; Vol. 5, núm. 1 (2004): PROFILE 5, NO.1. Issues in Teach .
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/25289/1/11211-26982-1-PB.pdf
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/25289/2/11211-26982-1-PB.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 54bce1d7ee00de572bbf80986cd6aae9
1b9d9ed0383f8e81cd1def9308cbbc4b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_ 1806886631496482816