Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros

Ilustraciones, mapas

Autores:
Mejía Durango, Diana Patricia
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/86181
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86181
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social
300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales
300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e instituciones
300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidades
320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados
330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativas
330 - Economía::338 - Producción
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantación
Gobernanza de la tierra
Prácticas agrícolas
Industria del café
Producción agropecuaria
Agricultura biológica - Investigaciones
Café -- Producción
Agroindustria del café -- Investigaciones
Interacción social
Sistemas socio-ecológicos
Sostenibilidad
Gobernanza
Contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas
Café
Social-ecological systems
Sustainability
Governance
Nature's contributions to people
Rights
openAccess
License
Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
id UNACIONAL2_2e30edeee30b0c971b2ce174d4549735
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/86181
network_acronym_str UNACIONAL2
network_name_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Governance, agricultural production practices and nature's contributions to people in coffee socio-ecological systems
title Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
spellingShingle Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social
300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales
300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e instituciones
300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidades
320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados
330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativas
330 - Economía::338 - Producción
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantación
Gobernanza de la tierra
Prácticas agrícolas
Industria del café
Producción agropecuaria
Agricultura biológica - Investigaciones
Café -- Producción
Agroindustria del café -- Investigaciones
Interacción social
Sistemas socio-ecológicos
Sostenibilidad
Gobernanza
Contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas
Café
Social-ecological systems
Sustainability
Governance
Nature's contributions to people
title_short Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
title_full Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
title_fullStr Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
title_full_unstemmed Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
title_sort Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Mejía Durango, Diana Patricia
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Villegas Palacio, Clara Inés
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Mejía Durango, Diana Patricia
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv Mejía Durango, Diana Patricia [0000-0001-8267-3185]
dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001643456
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv 300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social
300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales
300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e instituciones
300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidades
320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados
330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativas
330 - Economía::338 - Producción
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantación
topic 300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social
300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales
300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e instituciones
300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidades
320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados
330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativas
330 - Economía::338 - Producción
630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantación
Gobernanza de la tierra
Prácticas agrícolas
Industria del café
Producción agropecuaria
Agricultura biológica - Investigaciones
Café -- Producción
Agroindustria del café -- Investigaciones
Interacción social
Sistemas socio-ecológicos
Sostenibilidad
Gobernanza
Contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas
Café
Social-ecological systems
Sustainability
Governance
Nature's contributions to people
dc.subject.agrovoc.none.fl_str_mv Gobernanza de la tierra
Prácticas agrícolas
dc.subject.lemb.none.fl_str_mv Industria del café
Producción agropecuaria
Agricultura biológica - Investigaciones
Café -- Producción
Agroindustria del café -- Investigaciones
Interacción social
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Sistemas socio-ecológicos
Sostenibilidad
Gobernanza
Contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas
Café
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Social-ecological systems
Sustainability
Governance
Nature's contributions to people
description Ilustraciones, mapas
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86181
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86181
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.indexed.spa.fl_str_mv LaReferencia
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Adejumo, O. O. (2019). Ecological Limits: Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Development. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Climate Change Resilience (pp. 1-22). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_177-1
Akenroye, T. O., Dora, M., Kumar, M., Elbaz, J., Kah, S., & Jebli, F. (2021). A taxonomy of barriers to the adoption of sustainable practices in the coffee farming process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127818
Akenroye, T. O., Kumar, M., Dora, M., Ihua, U. B., Mtonga, V. J., & Aju, O. (2022). Evaluating the Barriers to Adopting Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Smallholder Coffee Farming: Implications for Global Value Chains. En R. Frei, S. Ibrahim, & T. Akenroye (Eds.), Africa and Sustainable Global Value Chains (pp. 117-142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78791-2_6
Andersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., & Lindborg, R. (2015). A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. AMBIO, 44(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y
Arango, Á. M., Dossman, M. Á., Muñoz, J., Bueno, L., Arias, J. J., Camargo, J. C., & Maya, J. M. (2020). Los servicios ecosistémicos desde la percepción de los productores de café de Belén de Umbría, Risaralda, Colombia. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 11(2), 81-94.
Arboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., Cueto, E. N., Arboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., & Cueto, E. N. (2020). El cooperativismo caficultor en Colombia: El caso de la Cooperativa de Caficultores de Andes en el Departamento de Antioquia, 1927-2015. América Latina en la historia económica, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.18232/alhe.1025
Arcila, J., Farfan, F., Moreno, A., Salazar, L., & Hincapie, E. (2007). Sistemas de producción de café en Colombia (Primera). FNC-Cenicafé. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/720
Ballesteros, M. A. (2018). Gobernanza policéntrica en sistemas socio-ecológicos complejos: La gestión de la pesquería del pulpo común (octopus vulgaris) en Galicia [Http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text, Universidade de Vigo]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=150262
Barnum, C. M. (2011). Analyzing the findings. En C. M. Barnum (Ed.), Usability Testing Essentials (pp. 239-275). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375092-1.00008-8
Basic. (2018). Coffee, behind the success story. Max Havelaar France, The French Fair Trade Platform, the «Rethinking Value Chains» Collective. https://lebasic.com/en/coffee-the-success-story-hiding-a-crisis/
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
Benavides, P. (s. f.). Brocarta. Cenicafé. ISSN - 2145-9053
Bennett, N., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters, 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600
Berrío, J., & Echeverri, L. (2020). Efectos de la variabilidad climática en la producción de café en el municipio de Betania: Alternativas de adaptación para su manejo [Especialización en café]. Universidad de Antioquia
Bethwell, C., Sattler, C., & Stachow, U. (2022). An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101402
Biggs, R., De Vos, A., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Routledge
Bodin, Ö., & Tengö, M. (2012). Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005
Brauman, K. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Polasky, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Brancalion, P. H. S., DeClerck, F., Jacob, U., Mastrangelo, M. E., Nkongolo, N. V., Palang, H., Pérez-Méndez, N., Shannon, L. J., Shrestha, U. B., Strombom, E., & Verma, M. (2020). Global trends in nature’s contributions to people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(51), 32799-32805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010473117
Bravo-Monroy, L. (2021). Coffee and Potato Agroecosystems: Social Construction of Spaces as a Concept to Analyse Nature’s Contributions to People. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.607230
Bravo-Monroy, L., Potts, S. G., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2016). Drivers influencing farmer decisions for adopting organic or conventional coffee management practices. Food Policy, 58, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.003
Bruley, E., Locatelli, B., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12031-260112
Bulitta, B. J., & Duguma, L. A. (2021). The Unexplored Socio-Cultural Benefits of Coffee Plants: Implications for the Sustainable Management of Ethiopia’s Coffee Forests. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073912
Castro-Toro, Á., Rivillas-Osorio, C., Serna-Giraldo, C., & Mejía-Mejía, C. (2008). Germinadores de café Construcción, manejo de Rhizoctonia solani y costos. Cenicafé. https://www.cenicafe.org/es/publications/avt0368.pdf
Cerdán, C. R., Rebolledo, M. C., Soto, G., Rapidel, B., & Sinclair, F. L. (2012). Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014
Chaves, C. (2005, junio 1). LA CATEGORIZACIÓN UN ASPECTO CRUCIAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CUALITATIVA. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/LA-CATEGORIZACI%C3%93N-UN-ASPECTO-CRUCIAL-EN-LA-Chaves/c5b95ef0d202839e1ffaa070670dc517b8000b22
Christie, M., Martín-López, B., Church, A., Siwicka, E., Szymonczyk, P., & Mena Sauterel, J. (2019). Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: Insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1267-1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6
Clément, R., Tuan, D., Cuong, V., Le Van, B., Trung, H. quôc, & Long, C. T. M. (2023). Transitioning from Monoculture to Mixed Cropping Systems: The Case of Coffee, Pepper, and Fruit Trees in Vietnam. Ecological Economics, 214, 107980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107980
Comité de cafeteros de Antioquia. (2022, agosto 11). Caficultura de Antioquia. https://fncantioquia.org/caficultura-de-antioquia/
Cornu, M.-A., Frick, R., Chongtham, I. R., Iocola, I., Canali, S., Colombo, L., Radzikowski, P., Stalenga, J., Viguier, L., Drexler, D., Schneider, A., Stilmant, D., & Vanwindekens, F. M. (2023). Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8
Corporación Autónoma Regional del Centro de Antioquia [Corantioquia], Durango López, M., Gutiérrez Velásquez, F., Giraldo Duque, Ó. I., & Aguirre Cuartas, A. (Eds.). (2005). Plan de ordenación y manejo cuenca hidrográfica del Río Pedral Municipio de Betania e Hispania. CORANTIOQUIA
Cumming, G. S., Epstein, G., Anderies, J. M., Apetrei, C. I., Baggio, J., Bodin, Ö., Chawla, S., Clements, H. S., Cox, M., Egli, L., Gurney, G. G., Lubell, M., Magliocca, N., Morrison, T. H., Müller, B., Seppelt, R., Schlüter, M., Unnikrishnan, H., Villamayor-Tomas, S., & Weible, C. M. (2020). Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: A post-Ostrom research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 44, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005
De Leijster, V., Santos, M. J., Wassen, M. W., Camargo García, J. C., Llorca Fernandez, I., Verkuil, L., Scheper, A., Steenhuis, M., & Verweij, P. A. (2021). Ecosystem services trajectories in coffee agroforestry in Colombia over 40 years. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101246
De Souza, M. C. (2010). Los conceptos estructurantes de la investigación cualitativa. Salud Colectiva, 6(3), 251-261
De Wit, M. P. (2020). Environmental Governance: Complexity and Cooperation in the Implementation of the SDGs. En W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Affordable and Clean Energy (pp. 1-15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_25-1
Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., … Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en educación médica, 2(7), Article 7
Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., van Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2012). Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance – Experiences From The Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580
Ellis, E. C., Pascual, U., & Mertz, O. (2019). Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: Negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001
Faith, D. P. (2021). Valuation and Appreciation of Biodiversity: The “Maintenance of Options” Provided by the Variety of Life. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.635670
Farhad, S., Gual, M. A., & Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. (2015). Linking governance and ecosystem services: The case of Isla Mayor (Andalusia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 46, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.019
Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia [FNC]. (2022). Informe del Gerente al 89 Congreso Nacional de Cafeteros 2021 (p. 136). https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/tipos/informes/
Federación Nacional de cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.). Chapola. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros. Recuperado 10 de enero de 2024, de https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/glosario/chapola/
Federación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-a). Venta de café con entrega inmediata. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-entrega-inmediata.pdf
Federación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-b). Ventas de café con precio piso. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-precio-piso.pdf
Federación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-c). Ventas de café en depósito. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-en-deposito.pdf
Firkowski, C. R., Schwantes, A. M., Fortin, M.-J., & Gonzalez, A. (2021). Monitoring social–ecological networks for biodiversity and ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes. FACETS, 6, 1670-1692. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0114
Flay, B., Snyder, F., & Petraitis, J. (2009). The Theory of Triadic influence. En Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (Second, pp. 451-510). New York: Jossey-Bass
Gil-Palacio, Z. (2020). Servicios ecosistémicos del control natural en el cultivo del café. En P. Benavides Machado & C. E. Góngora (Eds.), El Control Natural de Insectos en el Ecosistema Cafetero Colombiano (pp. 186-203). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0001_8
González, M., & Serna, A. (2018). Servicios ecosistemicos potenciales en el sector cafetero Colombiano. Revista Cenicafé, 69(2), 12
Grosinger, J., Vallet, A., Palomo, I., Buclet, N., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Collective capabilities shape the co-production of nature’s contributions to people in the alpine agricultural system of the Maurienne valley, France. Regional Environmental Change, 21(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01840-9
Guarín, C. A., & Pachón, F. A. (2012). Impact of coffee crop renewal program on small producers in department Cundinamarca (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana, 30(1), 133-140
Guzmán Díaz, B. E., Parra Hernández, R., & Tarapuez Chamorro, E. (2019). Identidad y manifestaciones culturales del departamento del Quindío en el contexto del paisaje cultural cafetero de Colombia. Cuadernos de turismo, 44, Article 44
Harvey, C. A., Pritts, A. A., Zwetsloot, M. J., Jansen, K., Pulleman, M. M., Armbrecht, I., Avelino, J., Barrera, J. F., Bunn, C., García, J. H., Isaza, C., Munoz-Ucros, J., Pérez-Alemán, C. J., Rahn, E., Robiglio, V., Somarriba, E., & Valencia, V. (2021). Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(5), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0
Heath, L. (2001). Triangulation: Methodology. En N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15901-15906). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00711-7
Hegger, D. L. T., Runhaar, H. A. C., Van Laerhoven, F., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2020). Towards explanations for stability and change in modes of environmental governance: A systematic approach with illustrations from the Netherlands. Earth System Governance, 3, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100048
Henriksson Malinga, R., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Andersson, E., & Gordon, L. (2018). On the other side of the ditch: Exploring contrasting ecosystem service coproduction between smallholder and commercial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10380-230409
Hill, R., Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Molnár, Z., & Van Velden, J. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Weaving plural perspectives. One Earth, 4(7), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.009
Hollaus, A., Schunko, C., Weisshaidinger, R., Bala, P., & Vogl, C. R. (2022). Nature’s contributions to people in the context of a changing traditional rice cultivation landscape in the Upper Baram, Malaysia. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 122(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2022.2162944
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES]. (2017). Update on the Classification of Nature’s Contributions to People by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services | System of Environmental Economic Accounting. 8
Isaac, R., Hofmann, J., Koegst, J., Schleyer, C., & Martín-López, B. (2024). Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: A policy document analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657
Isaac, R., Kachler, J., Winkler, K. J., Albrecht, E., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., & Martín-López, B. (2022). Chapter Ten—Governance to manage the complexity of nature’s contributions to people co-production. En J. M. Holzer, J. Baird, & G. M. Hickey (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 66, pp. 293-321). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250422000095
Jha, S., Bacon, C., Philpott, S., Méndez, E., Läderach, P., & Rice, R. (2014). Shade Coffee: Update on a Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity. BioScience, 64(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu038
Juerges, N., & Hansjürgens, B. (2018). Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1628-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143
Kachler, J., Isaac, R., Martín-López, B., Bonn, A., & Felipe-Lucia, M. R. (2023). Co-production of nature’s contributions to people: What evidence is out there? People and Nature, 5(4), 1119-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10493
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. En Governing as Governance (pp. 135-152). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/governing-as-governance/n9.xml
Koopmans, M. E., Rogge, E., Mettepenningen, E., Knickel, K., & Šūmane, S. (2018). The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012
Le, Q. V., Cowal, S., Jovanovic, G., & Le, D.-T. (2021). A Study of Regenerative Farming Practices and Sustainable Coffee of Ethnic Minorities Farmers in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.712733
Lechthaler, F., & Vinogradova, A. (2017). The climate challenge for agriculture and the value of climate services: Application to coffee-farming in Peru. European Economic Review, 99, 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.006
Leibovich, J., Córdoba, C. C., Sánchez, L. M., Marín, Y. A., Méndez, J. D., & Izquierdo, J. M. (2022). Proyección de productores y de la población en hogares cafeteros a 2050. Ensayos de Economía Cafetera, 1(35), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.38141/10788/035-1-1
Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
Lescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., Doussan, I., Dumont, B., Lefèvre, F., Litrico, I., Martin-Clouaire, R., Montuelle, B., Pellerin, S., Plantegenest, M., Tancoigne, E., Thomas, A., Guyomard, H., & Soussana, J.-F. (2015). A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001
Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A.-S., Norberg, J., Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., Hughes, T., Arrow, K., Barrett, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Kautsky, N., Mäler, K.-G., Polasky, S., Troell, M., Vincent, J., & Walker, B. (2013). Social-Ecological Systems as Complex Adaptive Systems: Modeling and Policy Implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460
Loft, L., Mann, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services, 16, 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002
López, A., & Espinosa, R. (2018). Biodiversidad en los paisajes cafeteros. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. http://reporte.humboldt.org.co/biodiversidad/2018/cap4/408/
Lugo-Pérez, J., Hajian-Forooshani, Z., Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2023). The importance of shade trees in promoting carbon storage in the coffee agroforest systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 355, 108594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108594
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution
McElwee, P. (2021). The role of soils in learning and inspiration, physical and psychological experiences, and in supporting identities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1834). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0184
McEvoy, S., van de Ven, F. H. M., Blind, M. W., & Slinger, J. H. (2018). Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041
Melchior, I. C., & Newig, J. (2021). Governing transitions towards sustainable agriculture—Taking stock of an emerging field of research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1-27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020528
Méndez-Rojas, D. M., Cultid-Medina, C. A., López-Barrera, F., & Escobar, F. (2022). How diverse are sun-grown coffee plantations? Local and landscape heterogeneity drives Andean rove beetle diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 339, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108122
Metzger, J. P., Fidelman, P., Sattler, C., Schröter, B., Maron, M., Eigenbrod, F., Fortin, M.-J., Hohlenwerger, C., & Rhodes, J. R. (2021). Connecting governance interventions to ecosystem services provision: A social-ecological network approach. People and Nature, 3(2), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10172
Milligan, M. C., Johnson, M. D., Garfinkel, M., Smith, C. J., & Njoroge, P. (2016). Quantifying pest control services by birds and ants in Kenyan coffee farms. Biological Conservation, 194, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.028
Ministerio de Cultura. (2012). Paisaje cultural cafetero: Un paisaje cultural productivo en permanente desarrollo. Ministerio de Cultura de Colombia. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/283
Mirschel, W., Berg-Mohnicke, M., Wieland, R., Wenkel, K.-O., Terleev, V. V., Topaj, A., & Mueller, L. (2020). Modelling and Simulation of Agricultural Landscapes. En W. Mirschel, V. V. Terleev, & K.-O. Wenkel (Eds.), Landscape Modelling and Decision Support (pp. 3-21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37421-1_1
Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F., Dronin, N. M., Mirschel, W., McKenzie, B. M., Antrop, M., Jones, M., Dannowski, R., Schindler, U., Behrendt, A., Rukhovich, O. V., Sychev, V. G., Sheudzhen, A. K., Romanenkov, V. A., Trofimov, I., Robinson, G. M., Schreg, R., Blum, W. E. H., Salnjikov, E., … Poulton, P. (2021). Agricultural Landscapes: History, Status and Challenges. En L. Mueller, V. G. Sychev, N. M. Dronin, & F. Eulenstein (Eds.), Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes (pp. 3-54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_1
Murillo-López, B. E., Castro, A. J., & Feijoo-Martínez, A. (2022). Nature’s Contributions to People Shape Sense of Place in the Coffee Cultural Landscape of Colombia. Agriculture, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040457
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8
Nguyen, N., & Drakou, E. G. (2021). Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: The case of Vietnamese coffee. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828
Niguse, G., Iticha, B., Kebede, G., & Chimdi, A. (2022). Contribution of coffee plants to carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems of Southwestern Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 160(6), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859622000624
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press
Organización Internacional del Trabajo [ILO]. (2022, junio 3). ¿Cómo cosechar trabajo decente en el sector cafetero colombiano? [Noticia]. http://www.ilo.org/lima/sala-de-prensa/WCMS_847365/lang--es/index.htm
Ostrom, E. (2009). El gobierno de los bienes comunes: La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Fondo de Cultura Económica
Pahl-Wostl, C., & Patterson, J. (2021). Transformative change in governance systems. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102405
Palomo, I., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Bennett, E. M., Martín-López, B., & Pascual, U. (2016). Chapter Six—Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production. En G. Woodward & D. A. Bohan (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 54, pp. 245-283). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250415000276
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., … Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Pemán, I., & Jiménez, G. (2013). La gobernanza multinivel como alternativa a la gestión del desarrollo del medio rural. http://www.dpz.es/areas/area-de-asistencia-y-modernizacion-local/desarrollo-rural-y-lucha-contra-la-despoblacion/documentacion/premios-de-investigacion/ano-2013/la-gobernanza-multinivel-como-alternativa-a-la-gestion-del-desarrollo-del-medio-rural/view
Perfecto, I., Jiménez-Soto, M. E., & Vandermeer, J. (2019). Coffee Landscapes Shaping the Anthropocene: Forced Simplification on a Complex Agroecological Landscape. Current Anthropology, 60(S20), S236-S250. https://doi.org/10.1086/703413
Periódico regional El Suroeste. (2020, junio 4). Balance del sector cafetero. Periódico regional El Suroeste- identidad y cultura. https://periodicoelsuroeste.com/balance-sector-cafetero/
Pham, Y., Reardon-Smith, K., Mushtaq, S., & Cockfield, G. (2019). The impact of climate change and variability on coffee production: A systematic review. Climatic Change, 156(4), 609-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02538-y
Power, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002
Primmer, E., Varumo, L., Krause, T., Orsi, F., Geneletti, D., Brogaard, S., Aukes, E., Ciolli, M., Grossmann, C., Hernández-Morcillo, M., Kister, J., Kluvánková, T., Loft, L., Maier, C., Meyer, C., Schleyer, C., Spacek, M., & Mann, C. (2021). Mapping Europe’s institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance. Ecosystem Services, 47, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101225
Proantioquia. (2021). Ruta Cartama Sostenible. https://www.proantioquia.org.co/ruta-cartama-sostenible
Riascos, M. A. J., Jurado, H. R. O., & Burbano, T. C. L. (2020). Evaluación de la captura de carbono en sistemas productivos de café (Coffea arabica L.), Consacá, Nariño, Colombia. Revista Luna Azul, 51, 166-181
Rich, K. M., PG, C., Muniyappa, A., Yadava, C., Manjyapura, G. S., Pradeepa Babu, B., Shubha, Y., & Rich, M. (2018). Coffee certification in India: Awareness, practices, and sustainability perception of growers. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(4), 448-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1361497
Risse, T. (2012). Governance Configurations in Areas of Limited Statehood. Actors, Modes, Institutions, and Resources. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, 32
Rizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G., & Vecchio, R. (2023). Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Organic Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7
Roldán, V., Villasante, S., & Outeiro, L. (2015). Linking marine and terrestrial ecosystem services through governance social networks analysis in Central Patagonia (Argentina). Ecosystem Services, 16, 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.010
Sabatier, P. A. (2010). Teorías Del Proceso de Las Políticas Públicas. Proyecto de Modernización del Estado, Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros, Presidencia de la Nación
Saito, O., Subramanian, S. M., Hashimoto, S., & Takeuchi, K. (2020). Introduction: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes. En O. Saito, S. M. Subramanian, S. Hashimoto, & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Managing Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes for Sustainable Communities in Asia: Mapping and Navigating Stakeholders, Policy and Action (pp. 1-10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2_1
Samoggia, A., & Fantini, A. (2023). Revealing the Governance Dynamics of the Coffee Chain in Colombia: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813646
Sankey, K. (2022). From survival to self-governance: A comparison of two peasant autonomy struggles in Colombia’s coffee and frontier regions. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22(3), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12465
Sarkki, S. (2017). Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 27, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.003
Sarkki, S., Jokinen, M., Heikkinen, H. I., Nijnik, M., Melnykovych, M., & Kluvánková, T. (2022). “Going out to get in”—Roles of forest conflicts in bottom-linked environmental governance progressing toward socio-political innovations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(6), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2020
Sattler, C., Barghusen, R., Bredemeier, B., Dutilly, C., & Prager, K. (2023). Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102668
Schmidt, P. G., & Bunn, C. (2021). Coordinated Implementation of Climate-Smart Practices in Coffee Farming Increases Benefits at Farm, Landscape and Global Scale. Frontiers in Climate, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.746139
Sidibé, A., Totin, E., Thompson- Hall, M., Traoré, O., Traore, P., & Schmitt Olabisi, L. (2017). Multi-scale governance in agriculture systems: Interplay between national and local institutions around the production dimension of food security in Mali. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.09.001
Siles, P., Cerdán, C. R., & Staver, C. (2022). Smallholder Coffee in the Global Economy—A Framework to Explore Transformation Alternatives of Traditional Agroforestry for Greater Economic, Ecological, and Livelihood Viability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.808207
Siles, P., Harmand, J.-M., & Vaast, P. (2010). Effects of Inga densiflora on the microclimate of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) and overall biomass under optimal growing conditions in Costa Rica. Agroforestry Systems, 78(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9241-y
Someus, E. (2009). 23 - Recycling and upgrading of bone meal for environmentally friendly crop protection and nutrition: The PROTECTOR project. En K. Waldron (Ed.), Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing (pp. 553-582). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697051.4.553
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia
Sumberg, J., & Giller, K. E. (2022). What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Global Food Security, 32, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100617
Tancoigne, E., Barbier, M., Cointet, J.-P., & Richard, G. (2014). The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 10, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004
Teixeira, H. M., Schulte, R. P. O., Anten, N. P. R., Bosco, L. C., Baartman, J. E. M., Moinet, G. Y. K., & Reidsma, P. (2022). How to quantify the impacts of diversification on sustainability? A review of indicators in coffee systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00785-5
Teixeira, H. M., Vermue, A. J., Cardoso, I. M., Peña Claros, M., & Bianchi, F. J. J. A. (2018). Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosystem Services, 33, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006
Tilden, G. M., Aranka, J. N., & Curry, G. N. (2023). Ecosystem services in coffee agroforestry: Their potential to improve labour efficiency amongst smallholder coffee producers. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00917-0
Torres, E., López, M., Torres, J., Sánchez, C., Moncada, J., Valencia, L., Marín, I., Calvopiña, J., & Marín, L. (2021). Boletín Económico Municipal 2021: Betania. Grupo de Investigación de Macroeconomía Aplicada, Universidad de Antioquia
UNESCO. (2023). The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
Vergara, C. H., & Badano, E. I. (2009). Pollinator diversity increases fruit production in Mexican coffee plantations: The importance of rustic management systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.001
Winkler, K. J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., & Crockett, E. T. H. (2021). Governance of ecosystem services: A review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235
Zinngrebe, Y., Borasino, E., Chiputwa, B., Dobie, P., Garcia, E., Gassner, A., Kihumuro, P., Komarudin, H., Liswanti, N., Makui, P., Plieninger, T., Winter, E., & Hauck, J. (2020). Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: Connecting conservation and farming actors. Sustainability Science, 15(5), 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8
Zurbriggen, C., Agricultura (IICA), I. I. de C. para la, Uruguay (UDELAR), U. de la R. de, Tecnología (ETIT), E. T. I. y, & Regional (PCIIR), P. de C. I. e I. (2016). Hacia una nueva gobernanza Co-creación de iniciativas innovadoras para un desarrollo agrícola sostenible. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/2675
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 150 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Minas
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/2/1038803490.2024.pdf
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/3/1038803490.2024.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a
7edd38994aa8b462f92312536bdb5f69
18fdf7874f60ed2d9f3760d43b39794c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_ 1814089513866100736
spelling Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Villegas Palacio, Clara Inés9bab9890d6e63f22b4b9ead6f09a5085Mejía Durango, Diana Patriciad576cfcf917446e8f7c203a3e619a8b1Mejía Durango, Diana Patricia [0000-0001-8267-3185]https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=00016434562024-05-29T16:02:45Z2024-05-29T16:02:45Z2024https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86181Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/Ilustraciones, mapasLos paisajes productivos cafeteros (PPC) constituyen una fuente de alimento, de identidad cultural, vida social, valor estético y vida rural. Sin embargo, las complejas dinámicas en las que se encuentra inmersa la caficultura han generado una gran presión sobre los PPC, que compromete la provisión potencial de otras contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (NCP) y socavan las bases naturales de la misma caficultura. La intensificación de la caficultura contribuye a la creación de paisajes con una alta provisión de café a expensas de otras NCP (trade-off) mientras que, otras alternativas productivas pueden favorecer la provisión de diversas contribuciones. Estas alternativas productivas se viabilizan, entre otras formas, a través de la gobernanza dado que esta última puede orientar, por medio de las intervenciones de gobernanza, las decisiones de gestión agrícola hacia determinados modelos de producción. Con el propósito de contribuir al entendimiento de la incidencia de los modos de gobernanza en las prácticas producción agrícola y, por tanto, en la provisión potencial de otras NCP en un sistema-socio-ecológico (SSE) cafetero, en esta tesis se propuso, mediante una investigación de enfoque cualitativo, analizar la tipología de gobernanza y su incidencia sobre las prácticas y las contribuciones de la naturaleza. Para esto, se hizo necesario determinar los modos de gobernanza, las prácticas agrícolas adoptadas, las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas que son percibidas y las condiciones marco para la caficultura que influyen en las decisiones de adopción. Los hallazgos son indicativos de la coexistencia de cuatro modos de gobernanza a los cuales se les puede atribuir diversas intervenciones de gobernanza dirigidas a incidir sobre el comportamiento del caficultor. Parece existir un predominio de intervenciones atribuidas a la auto-gobernanza, que resalta la participación del mercado; y una tendencia orientada a la adopción de prácticas agrícolas intensivas. Los resultados revelan la complejidad de interacciones de condiciones marco para la caficultura que pueden influir en la toma de decisiones de los caficultores. (Tomado de la fuente)Coffee productive landscapes (CPP) constitute a source of food, cultural identity, social life, aesthetic value and rural life. However, the complex dynamics in which coffee farming is immersed have generated great pressure on PPC, which compromise the potential provision of other nature's contributions to people (NCP) and undermine the natural foundations of coffee farming itself. The intensification of coffee growing contributes to the creation of landscapes with a high supply of coffee at the expense of other NCP (trade-off), while other productive alternatives can favor the provision of various contributions. These productive alternatives are made viable, among other ways, through governance since the latter can guide, through governance interventions, agricultural management decisions towards certain production models. With the purpose of contributing to the understanding of the impact of governance modes on agricultural production practices and, therefore, on the potential provision of other NCP in a coffee socio-ecological system (SES), this thesis proposed, through qualitative research, analyze the typology of governance and its impact on the practices and NCP. For this, it became necessary to determine the modes of governance, the agricultural practices adopted, the nature's contributions to people that are perceived and the frame conditions for coffee growing that influence adoption decisions. The findings are indicative of the coexistence of four modes of governance to which various governance interventions aimed at influencing coffee grower behavior can be attributed. There seems to be a predominance of interventions attributed to self-governance, which highlights market participation; and a trend towards the adoption of intensive agricultural practices. Likewise, the results reveal the complexity of interactions of framework conditions for coffee growing that can influence the decision making of coffee growers.MaestríaMagíster en Medio Ambiente y DesarrolloLa presente tesis es un investigación cualitativa de corte descriptivo.Medio Ambiente.Sede Medellín150 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y DesarrolloFacultad de MinasMedellín, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción social300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e instituciones300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidades320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estados330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativas330 - Economía::338 - Producción630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantaciónGobernanza de la tierraPrácticas agrícolasIndustria del caféProducción agropecuariaAgricultura biológica - InvestigacionesCafé -- ProducciónAgroindustria del café -- InvestigacionesInteracción socialSistemas socio-ecológicosSostenibilidadGobernanzaContribuciones de la naturaleza a las personasCaféSocial-ecological systemsSustainabilityGovernanceNature's contributions to peopleGobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeterosGovernance, agricultural production practices and nature's contributions to people in coffee socio-ecological systemsTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMLaReferenciaAdejumo, O. O. (2019). Ecological Limits: Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Development. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Climate Change Resilience (pp. 1-22). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_177-1Akenroye, T. O., Dora, M., Kumar, M., Elbaz, J., Kah, S., & Jebli, F. (2021). A taxonomy of barriers to the adoption of sustainable practices in the coffee farming process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127818Akenroye, T. O., Kumar, M., Dora, M., Ihua, U. B., Mtonga, V. J., & Aju, O. (2022). Evaluating the Barriers to Adopting Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Smallholder Coffee Farming: Implications for Global Value Chains. En R. Frei, S. Ibrahim, & T. Akenroye (Eds.), Africa and Sustainable Global Value Chains (pp. 117-142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78791-2_6Andersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., & Lindborg, R. (2015). A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. AMBIO, 44(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0603-yArango, Á. M., Dossman, M. Á., Muñoz, J., Bueno, L., Arias, J. J., Camargo, J. C., & Maya, J. M. (2020). Los servicios ecosistémicos desde la percepción de los productores de café de Belén de Umbría, Risaralda, Colombia. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 11(2), 81-94.Arboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., Cueto, E. N., Arboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., & Cueto, E. N. (2020). El cooperativismo caficultor en Colombia: El caso de la Cooperativa de Caficultores de Andes en el Departamento de Antioquia, 1927-2015. América Latina en la historia económica, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.18232/alhe.1025Arcila, J., Farfan, F., Moreno, A., Salazar, L., & Hincapie, E. (2007). Sistemas de producción de café en Colombia (Primera). FNC-Cenicafé. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/720Ballesteros, M. A. (2018). Gobernanza policéntrica en sistemas socio-ecológicos complejos: La gestión de la pesquería del pulpo común (octopus vulgaris) en Galicia [Http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text, Universidade de Vigo]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=150262Barnum, C. M. (2011). Analyzing the findings. En C. M. Barnum (Ed.), Usability Testing Essentials (pp. 239-275). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375092-1.00008-8Basic. (2018). Coffee, behind the success story. Max Havelaar France, The French Fair Trade Platform, the «Rethinking Value Chains» Collective. https://lebasic.com/en/coffee-the-success-story-hiding-a-crisis/Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937Benavides, P. (s. f.). Brocarta. Cenicafé. ISSN - 2145-9053Bennett, N., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters, 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600Berrío, J., & Echeverri, L. (2020). Efectos de la variabilidad climática en la producción de café en el municipio de Betania: Alternativas de adaptación para su manejo [Especialización en café]. Universidad de AntioquiaBethwell, C., Sattler, C., & Stachow, U. (2022). An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101402Biggs, R., De Vos, A., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. RoutledgeBodin, Ö., & Tengö, M. (2012). Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005Brauman, K. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Polasky, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Brancalion, P. H. S., DeClerck, F., Jacob, U., Mastrangelo, M. E., Nkongolo, N. V., Palang, H., Pérez-Méndez, N., Shannon, L. J., Shrestha, U. B., Strombom, E., & Verma, M. (2020). Global trends in nature’s contributions to people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(51), 32799-32805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010473117Bravo-Monroy, L. (2021). Coffee and Potato Agroecosystems: Social Construction of Spaces as a Concept to Analyse Nature’s Contributions to People. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.607230Bravo-Monroy, L., Potts, S. G., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2016). Drivers influencing farmer decisions for adopting organic or conventional coffee management practices. Food Policy, 58, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.003Bruley, E., Locatelli, B., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12031-260112Bulitta, B. J., & Duguma, L. A. (2021). The Unexplored Socio-Cultural Benefits of Coffee Plants: Implications for the Sustainable Management of Ethiopia’s Coffee Forests. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073912Castro-Toro, Á., Rivillas-Osorio, C., Serna-Giraldo, C., & Mejía-Mejía, C. (2008). Germinadores de café Construcción, manejo de Rhizoctonia solani y costos. Cenicafé. https://www.cenicafe.org/es/publications/avt0368.pdfCerdán, C. R., Rebolledo, M. C., Soto, G., Rapidel, B., & Sinclair, F. L. (2012). Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014Chaves, C. (2005, junio 1). LA CATEGORIZACIÓN UN ASPECTO CRUCIAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CUALITATIVA. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/LA-CATEGORIZACI%C3%93N-UN-ASPECTO-CRUCIAL-EN-LA-Chaves/c5b95ef0d202839e1ffaa070670dc517b8000b22Christie, M., Martín-López, B., Church, A., Siwicka, E., Szymonczyk, P., & Mena Sauterel, J. (2019). Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: Insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1267-1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6Clément, R., Tuan, D., Cuong, V., Le Van, B., Trung, H. quôc, & Long, C. T. M. (2023). Transitioning from Monoculture to Mixed Cropping Systems: The Case of Coffee, Pepper, and Fruit Trees in Vietnam. Ecological Economics, 214, 107980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107980Comité de cafeteros de Antioquia. (2022, agosto 11). Caficultura de Antioquia. https://fncantioquia.org/caficultura-de-antioquia/Cornu, M.-A., Frick, R., Chongtham, I. R., Iocola, I., Canali, S., Colombo, L., Radzikowski, P., Stalenga, J., Viguier, L., Drexler, D., Schneider, A., Stilmant, D., & Vanwindekens, F. M. (2023). Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8Corporación Autónoma Regional del Centro de Antioquia [Corantioquia], Durango López, M., Gutiérrez Velásquez, F., Giraldo Duque, Ó. I., & Aguirre Cuartas, A. (Eds.). (2005). Plan de ordenación y manejo cuenca hidrográfica del Río Pedral Municipio de Betania e Hispania. CORANTIOQUIACumming, G. S., Epstein, G., Anderies, J. M., Apetrei, C. I., Baggio, J., Bodin, Ö., Chawla, S., Clements, H. S., Cox, M., Egli, L., Gurney, G. G., Lubell, M., Magliocca, N., Morrison, T. H., Müller, B., Seppelt, R., Schlüter, M., Unnikrishnan, H., Villamayor-Tomas, S., & Weible, C. M. (2020). Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: A post-Ostrom research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 44, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005De Leijster, V., Santos, M. J., Wassen, M. W., Camargo García, J. C., Llorca Fernandez, I., Verkuil, L., Scheper, A., Steenhuis, M., & Verweij, P. A. (2021). Ecosystem services trajectories in coffee agroforestry in Colombia over 40 years. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101246De Souza, M. C. (2010). Los conceptos estructurantes de la investigación cualitativa. Salud Colectiva, 6(3), 251-261De Wit, M. P. (2020). Environmental Governance: Complexity and Cooperation in the Implementation of the SDGs. En W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Affordable and Clean Energy (pp. 1-15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_25-1Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., … Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en educación médica, 2(7), Article 7Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., van Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2012). Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance – Experiences From The Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580Ellis, E. C., Pascual, U., & Mertz, O. (2019). Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: Negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001Faith, D. P. (2021). Valuation and Appreciation of Biodiversity: The “Maintenance of Options” Provided by the Variety of Life. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.635670Farhad, S., Gual, M. A., & Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. (2015). Linking governance and ecosystem services: The case of Isla Mayor (Andalusia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 46, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.019Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia [FNC]. (2022). Informe del Gerente al 89 Congreso Nacional de Cafeteros 2021 (p. 136). https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/tipos/informes/Federación Nacional de cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.). Chapola. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros. Recuperado 10 de enero de 2024, de https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/glosario/chapola/Federación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-a). Venta de café con entrega inmediata. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-entrega-inmediata.pdfFederación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-b). Ventas de café con precio piso. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-precio-piso.pdfFederación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-c). Ventas de café en depósito. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-en-deposito.pdfFirkowski, C. R., Schwantes, A. M., Fortin, M.-J., & Gonzalez, A. (2021). Monitoring social–ecological networks for biodiversity and ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes. FACETS, 6, 1670-1692. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0114Flay, B., Snyder, F., & Petraitis, J. (2009). The Theory of Triadic influence. En Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (Second, pp. 451-510). New York: Jossey-BassGil-Palacio, Z. (2020). Servicios ecosistémicos del control natural en el cultivo del café. En P. Benavides Machado & C. E. Góngora (Eds.), El Control Natural de Insectos en el Ecosistema Cafetero Colombiano (pp. 186-203). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0001_8González, M., & Serna, A. (2018). Servicios ecosistemicos potenciales en el sector cafetero Colombiano. Revista Cenicafé, 69(2), 12Grosinger, J., Vallet, A., Palomo, I., Buclet, N., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Collective capabilities shape the co-production of nature’s contributions to people in the alpine agricultural system of the Maurienne valley, France. Regional Environmental Change, 21(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01840-9Guarín, C. A., & Pachón, F. A. (2012). Impact of coffee crop renewal program on small producers in department Cundinamarca (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana, 30(1), 133-140Guzmán Díaz, B. E., Parra Hernández, R., & Tarapuez Chamorro, E. (2019). Identidad y manifestaciones culturales del departamento del Quindío en el contexto del paisaje cultural cafetero de Colombia. Cuadernos de turismo, 44, Article 44Harvey, C. A., Pritts, A. A., Zwetsloot, M. J., Jansen, K., Pulleman, M. M., Armbrecht, I., Avelino, J., Barrera, J. F., Bunn, C., García, J. H., Isaza, C., Munoz-Ucros, J., Pérez-Alemán, C. J., Rahn, E., Robiglio, V., Somarriba, E., & Valencia, V. (2021). Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(5), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0Heath, L. (2001). Triangulation: Methodology. En N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15901-15906). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00711-7Hegger, D. L. T., Runhaar, H. A. C., Van Laerhoven, F., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2020). Towards explanations for stability and change in modes of environmental governance: A systematic approach with illustrations from the Netherlands. Earth System Governance, 3, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100048Henriksson Malinga, R., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Andersson, E., & Gordon, L. (2018). On the other side of the ditch: Exploring contrasting ecosystem service coproduction between smallholder and commercial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10380-230409Hill, R., Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Molnár, Z., & Van Velden, J. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Weaving plural perspectives. One Earth, 4(7), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.009Hollaus, A., Schunko, C., Weisshaidinger, R., Bala, P., & Vogl, C. R. (2022). Nature’s contributions to people in the context of a changing traditional rice cultivation landscape in the Upper Baram, Malaysia. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 122(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2022.2162944Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES]. (2017). Update on the Classification of Nature’s Contributions to People by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services | System of Environmental Economic Accounting. 8Isaac, R., Hofmann, J., Koegst, J., Schleyer, C., & Martín-López, B. (2024). Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: A policy document analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657Isaac, R., Kachler, J., Winkler, K. J., Albrecht, E., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., & Martín-López, B. (2022). Chapter Ten—Governance to manage the complexity of nature’s contributions to people co-production. En J. M. Holzer, J. Baird, & G. M. Hickey (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 66, pp. 293-321). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250422000095Jha, S., Bacon, C., Philpott, S., Méndez, E., Läderach, P., & Rice, R. (2014). Shade Coffee: Update on a Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity. BioScience, 64(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu038Juerges, N., & Hansjürgens, B. (2018). Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1628-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143Kachler, J., Isaac, R., Martín-López, B., Bonn, A., & Felipe-Lucia, M. R. (2023). Co-production of nature’s contributions to people: What evidence is out there? People and Nature, 5(4), 1119-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10493Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. En Governing as Governance (pp. 135-152). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/governing-as-governance/n9.xmlKoopmans, M. E., Rogge, E., Mettepenningen, E., Knickel, K., & Šūmane, S. (2018). The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012Le, Q. V., Cowal, S., Jovanovic, G., & Le, D.-T. (2021). A Study of Regenerative Farming Practices and Sustainable Coffee of Ethnic Minorities Farmers in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.712733Lechthaler, F., & Vinogradova, A. (2017). The climate challenge for agriculture and the value of climate services: Application to coffee-farming in Peru. European Economic Review, 99, 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.006Leibovich, J., Córdoba, C. C., Sánchez, L. M., Marín, Y. A., Méndez, J. D., & Izquierdo, J. M. (2022). Proyección de productores y de la población en hogares cafeteros a 2050. Ensayos de Economía Cafetera, 1(35), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.38141/10788/035-1-1Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621Lescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., Doussan, I., Dumont, B., Lefèvre, F., Litrico, I., Martin-Clouaire, R., Montuelle, B., Pellerin, S., Plantegenest, M., Tancoigne, E., Thomas, A., Guyomard, H., & Soussana, J.-F. (2015). A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A.-S., Norberg, J., Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., Hughes, T., Arrow, K., Barrett, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Kautsky, N., Mäler, K.-G., Polasky, S., Troell, M., Vincent, J., & Walker, B. (2013). Social-Ecological Systems as Complex Adaptive Systems: Modeling and Policy Implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460Loft, L., Mann, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services, 16, 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002López, A., & Espinosa, R. (2018). Biodiversidad en los paisajes cafeteros. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. http://reporte.humboldt.org.co/biodiversidad/2018/cap4/408/Lugo-Pérez, J., Hajian-Forooshani, Z., Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2023). The importance of shade trees in promoting carbon storage in the coffee agroforest systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 355, 108594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108594Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solutionMcElwee, P. (2021). The role of soils in learning and inspiration, physical and psychological experiences, and in supporting identities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1834). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0184McEvoy, S., van de Ven, F. H. M., Blind, M. W., & Slinger, J. H. (2018). Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041Melchior, I. C., & Newig, J. (2021). Governing transitions towards sustainable agriculture—Taking stock of an emerging field of research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1-27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020528Méndez-Rojas, D. M., Cultid-Medina, C. A., López-Barrera, F., & Escobar, F. (2022). How diverse are sun-grown coffee plantations? Local and landscape heterogeneity drives Andean rove beetle diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 339, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108122Metzger, J. P., Fidelman, P., Sattler, C., Schröter, B., Maron, M., Eigenbrod, F., Fortin, M.-J., Hohlenwerger, C., & Rhodes, J. R. (2021). Connecting governance interventions to ecosystem services provision: A social-ecological network approach. People and Nature, 3(2), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10172Milligan, M. C., Johnson, M. D., Garfinkel, M., Smith, C. J., & Njoroge, P. (2016). Quantifying pest control services by birds and ants in Kenyan coffee farms. Biological Conservation, 194, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.028Ministerio de Cultura. (2012). Paisaje cultural cafetero: Un paisaje cultural productivo en permanente desarrollo. Ministerio de Cultura de Colombia. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/283Mirschel, W., Berg-Mohnicke, M., Wieland, R., Wenkel, K.-O., Terleev, V. V., Topaj, A., & Mueller, L. (2020). Modelling and Simulation of Agricultural Landscapes. En W. Mirschel, V. V. Terleev, & K.-O. Wenkel (Eds.), Landscape Modelling and Decision Support (pp. 3-21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37421-1_1Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F., Dronin, N. M., Mirschel, W., McKenzie, B. M., Antrop, M., Jones, M., Dannowski, R., Schindler, U., Behrendt, A., Rukhovich, O. V., Sychev, V. G., Sheudzhen, A. K., Romanenkov, V. A., Trofimov, I., Robinson, G. M., Schreg, R., Blum, W. E. H., Salnjikov, E., … Poulton, P. (2021). Agricultural Landscapes: History, Status and Challenges. En L. Mueller, V. G. Sychev, N. M. Dronin, & F. Eulenstein (Eds.), Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes (pp. 3-54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_1Murillo-López, B. E., Castro, A. J., & Feijoo-Martínez, A. (2022). Nature’s Contributions to People Shape Sense of Place in the Coffee Cultural Landscape of Colombia. Agriculture, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040457Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8Nguyen, N., & Drakou, E. G. (2021). Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: The case of Vietnamese coffee. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828Niguse, G., Iticha, B., Kebede, G., & Chimdi, A. (2022). Contribution of coffee plants to carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems of Southwestern Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 160(6), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859622000624North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University PressOrganización Internacional del Trabajo [ILO]. (2022, junio 3). ¿Cómo cosechar trabajo decente en el sector cafetero colombiano? [Noticia]. http://www.ilo.org/lima/sala-de-prensa/WCMS_847365/lang--es/index.htmOstrom, E. (2009). El gobierno de los bienes comunes: La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Fondo de Cultura EconómicaPahl-Wostl, C., & Patterson, J. (2021). Transformative change in governance systems. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102405Palomo, I., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Bennett, E. M., Martín-López, B., & Pascual, U. (2016). Chapter Six—Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production. En G. Woodward & D. A. Bohan (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 54, pp. 245-283). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250415000276Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., … Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006Pemán, I., & Jiménez, G. (2013). La gobernanza multinivel como alternativa a la gestión del desarrollo del medio rural. http://www.dpz.es/areas/area-de-asistencia-y-modernizacion-local/desarrollo-rural-y-lucha-contra-la-despoblacion/documentacion/premios-de-investigacion/ano-2013/la-gobernanza-multinivel-como-alternativa-a-la-gestion-del-desarrollo-del-medio-rural/viewPerfecto, I., Jiménez-Soto, M. E., & Vandermeer, J. (2019). Coffee Landscapes Shaping the Anthropocene: Forced Simplification on a Complex Agroecological Landscape. Current Anthropology, 60(S20), S236-S250. https://doi.org/10.1086/703413Periódico regional El Suroeste. (2020, junio 4). Balance del sector cafetero. Periódico regional El Suroeste- identidad y cultura. https://periodicoelsuroeste.com/balance-sector-cafetero/Pham, Y., Reardon-Smith, K., Mushtaq, S., & Cockfield, G. (2019). The impact of climate change and variability on coffee production: A systematic review. Climatic Change, 156(4), 609-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02538-yPower, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002Primmer, E., Varumo, L., Krause, T., Orsi, F., Geneletti, D., Brogaard, S., Aukes, E., Ciolli, M., Grossmann, C., Hernández-Morcillo, M., Kister, J., Kluvánková, T., Loft, L., Maier, C., Meyer, C., Schleyer, C., Spacek, M., & Mann, C. (2021). Mapping Europe’s institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance. Ecosystem Services, 47, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101225Proantioquia. (2021). Ruta Cartama Sostenible. https://www.proantioquia.org.co/ruta-cartama-sostenibleRiascos, M. A. J., Jurado, H. R. O., & Burbano, T. C. L. (2020). Evaluación de la captura de carbono en sistemas productivos de café (Coffea arabica L.), Consacá, Nariño, Colombia. Revista Luna Azul, 51, 166-181Rich, K. M., PG, C., Muniyappa, A., Yadava, C., Manjyapura, G. S., Pradeepa Babu, B., Shubha, Y., & Rich, M. (2018). Coffee certification in India: Awareness, practices, and sustainability perception of growers. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(4), 448-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1361497Risse, T. (2012). Governance Configurations in Areas of Limited Statehood. Actors, Modes, Institutions, and Resources. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, 32Rizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G., & Vecchio, R. (2023). Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Organic Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7Roldán, V., Villasante, S., & Outeiro, L. (2015). Linking marine and terrestrial ecosystem services through governance social networks analysis in Central Patagonia (Argentina). Ecosystem Services, 16, 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.010Sabatier, P. A. (2010). Teorías Del Proceso de Las Políticas Públicas. Proyecto de Modernización del Estado, Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros, Presidencia de la NaciónSaito, O., Subramanian, S. M., Hashimoto, S., & Takeuchi, K. (2020). Introduction: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes. En O. Saito, S. M. Subramanian, S. Hashimoto, & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Managing Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes for Sustainable Communities in Asia: Mapping and Navigating Stakeholders, Policy and Action (pp. 1-10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2_1Samoggia, A., & Fantini, A. (2023). Revealing the Governance Dynamics of the Coffee Chain in Colombia: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813646Sankey, K. (2022). From survival to self-governance: A comparison of two peasant autonomy struggles in Colombia’s coffee and frontier regions. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22(3), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12465Sarkki, S. (2017). Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 27, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.003Sarkki, S., Jokinen, M., Heikkinen, H. I., Nijnik, M., Melnykovych, M., & Kluvánková, T. (2022). “Going out to get in”—Roles of forest conflicts in bottom-linked environmental governance progressing toward socio-political innovations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(6), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2020Sattler, C., Barghusen, R., Bredemeier, B., Dutilly, C., & Prager, K. (2023). Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102668Schmidt, P. G., & Bunn, C. (2021). Coordinated Implementation of Climate-Smart Practices in Coffee Farming Increases Benefits at Farm, Landscape and Global Scale. Frontiers in Climate, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.746139Sidibé, A., Totin, E., Thompson- Hall, M., Traoré, O., Traore, P., & Schmitt Olabisi, L. (2017). Multi-scale governance in agriculture systems: Interplay between national and local institutions around the production dimension of food security in Mali. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.09.001Siles, P., Cerdán, C. R., & Staver, C. (2022). Smallholder Coffee in the Global Economy—A Framework to Explore Transformation Alternatives of Traditional Agroforestry for Greater Economic, Ecological, and Livelihood Viability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.808207Siles, P., Harmand, J.-M., & Vaast, P. (2010). Effects of Inga densiflora on the microclimate of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) and overall biomass under optimal growing conditions in Costa Rica. Agroforestry Systems, 78(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9241-ySomeus, E. (2009). 23 - Recycling and upgrading of bone meal for environmentally friendly crop protection and nutrition: The PROTECTOR project. En K. Waldron (Ed.), Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing (pp. 553-582). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697051.4.553Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de AntioquiaSumberg, J., & Giller, K. E. (2022). What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Global Food Security, 32, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100617Tancoigne, E., Barbier, M., Cointet, J.-P., & Richard, G. (2014). The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 10, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004Teixeira, H. M., Schulte, R. P. O., Anten, N. P. R., Bosco, L. C., Baartman, J. E. M., Moinet, G. Y. K., & Reidsma, P. (2022). How to quantify the impacts of diversification on sustainability? A review of indicators in coffee systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00785-5Teixeira, H. M., Vermue, A. J., Cardoso, I. M., Peña Claros, M., & Bianchi, F. J. J. A. (2018). Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosystem Services, 33, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006Tilden, G. M., Aranka, J. N., & Curry, G. N. (2023). Ecosystem services in coffee agroforestry: Their potential to improve labour efficiency amongst smallholder coffee producers. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00917-0Torres, E., López, M., Torres, J., Sánchez, C., Moncada, J., Valencia, L., Marín, I., Calvopiña, J., & Marín, L. (2021). Boletín Económico Municipal 2021: Betania. Grupo de Investigación de Macroeconomía Aplicada, Universidad de AntioquiaUNESCO. (2023). The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018Vergara, C. H., & Badano, E. I. (2009). Pollinator diversity increases fruit production in Mexican coffee plantations: The importance of rustic management systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.001Winkler, K. J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., & Crockett, E. T. H. (2021). Governance of ecosystem services: A review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235Zinngrebe, Y., Borasino, E., Chiputwa, B., Dobie, P., Garcia, E., Gassner, A., Kihumuro, P., Komarudin, H., Liswanti, N., Makui, P., Plieninger, T., Winter, E., & Hauck, J. (2020). Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: Connecting conservation and farming actors. Sustainability Science, 15(5), 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8Zurbriggen, C., Agricultura (IICA), I. I. de C. para la, Uruguay (UDELAR), U. de la R. de, Tecnología (ETIT), E. T. I. y, & Regional (PCIIR), P. de C. I. e I. (2016). Hacia una nueva gobernanza Co-creación de iniciativas innovadoras para un desarrollo agrícola sostenible. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/2675EstudiantesGrupos comunitariosInvestigadoresMaestrosPúblico generalResponsables políticosLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51ORIGINAL1038803490.2024.pdf1038803490.2024.pdfTesis de Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrolloapplication/pdf3979854https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/2/1038803490.2024.pdf7edd38994aa8b462f92312536bdb5f69MD52THUMBNAIL1038803490.2024.pdf.jpg1038803490.2024.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4514https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/86181/3/1038803490.2024.pdf.jpg18fdf7874f60ed2d9f3760d43b39794cMD53unal/86181oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/861812024-08-25 23:11:14.23Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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