Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia
Innovation is a concept widely used in academia and the business world. However, it emerges intertwined with the profit-seeking and inequality inherent to the capitalist model which prioritizes the transactional over the relational. Inquiries into alternative innovation concepts have therefore aimed...
- Autores:
-
Reina-Rozo, Juan David
- Tipo de recurso:
- Informe
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/75535
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75535
- Palabra clave:
- Ingeniería y operaciones afines
Cambio socio-técnico; Innovación Comunal; Colaboración; Ecosistemas de Innovación de Base Comunitaria; Colombia; Uganda
Socio-technical change; Communal Innovation; Collaboration; Community-based Innovation Ecosystems
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
id |
UNACIONAL2_1d8553a9ea79bdaec734ed8fc289ff4a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/75535 |
network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv |
Implications of collaboration in local innovation ecosystems. Multiple case study in Uganda and Colombia. |
title |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
spellingShingle |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia Ingeniería y operaciones afines Cambio socio-técnico; Innovación Comunal; Colaboración; Ecosistemas de Innovación de Base Comunitaria; Colombia; Uganda Socio-technical change; Communal Innovation; Collaboration; Community-based Innovation Ecosystems |
title_short |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
title_full |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
title_fullStr |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
title_sort |
Implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y Colombia |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Reina-Rozo, Juan David |
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Peña-Reyes, José Ismael |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Reina-Rozo, Juan David |
dc.contributor.corporatename.spa.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial |
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Investigación en Tecnologías e Innovación Comunitaria |
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ingeniería y operaciones afines |
topic |
Ingeniería y operaciones afines Cambio socio-técnico; Innovación Comunal; Colaboración; Ecosistemas de Innovación de Base Comunitaria; Colombia; Uganda Socio-technical change; Communal Innovation; Collaboration; Community-based Innovation Ecosystems |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cambio socio-técnico; Innovación Comunal; Colaboración; Ecosistemas de Innovación de Base Comunitaria; Colombia; Uganda |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Socio-technical change; Communal Innovation; Collaboration; Community-based Innovation Ecosystems |
description |
Innovation is a concept widely used in academia and the business world. However, it emerges intertwined with the profit-seeking and inequality inherent to the capitalist model which prioritizes the transactional over the relational. Inquiries into alternative innovation concepts have therefore aimed to create social value and assess an array of potential reformist and/or transformative effects. These alternatives, however, often fail to take into account ontologies and epistemologies of populations in diverse contexts and territories. The concept of communal innovation emerges out of these shortcomings, prioritizing the collaborative creation of common resources and resulting in the strengthening of the community and social fabric. The aforementioned collaboration occupies a central place in community processes of socio-technical change. The qualitative research presented here is based on two case studies rooted in post-agreement/post-conflict contexts in Guapi - Colombia and Aura - Uganda. The main objective is to explain the implications of collaboration on local innovation ecosystems in the territories of the Guajuí River Community Council in Guapi, and the Rhino Refugee Camp in Arua. The result is the systematization of the two community-based innovation ecosystems, as well as the highlighting of key actors, their roles, relations and the environment in which they develop, including its values, knowledge, public policies, natural environment and infrastructure. Finally, the conclusions illustrate how the collaboration processes in these case studies undergo decision-making-based governance, the creation of shared norms, authentic reciprocity, the autonomy of organizations and the construction of trust through initiatives of socio-technical change, especially those centered on resilience and co-existence. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-29T19:21:38Z |
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-29T19:21:38Z |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-27 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Documento de trabajo |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/report |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fc |
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTCASO |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fc |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75535 |
url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75535 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Aapaoja, A., & Leviäkangas, P. (2015). Local innovation system in northern Finland - case renewable energy solutions pilots in oulu. International Journal of Technology, 6(5), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i5.1230 Acosta, A. (2012). Buen vivir-Sumak kawsay: Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Quito: AbyaYala. Acosta, A. (2015). El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo . Algunas reflexiones económicas y no tan económicas. Política y Sociedad, 52(2), 299–330. Acosta, A. (2017). Living Well : ideas for reinventing the future. Third World Quarterly, 6597(November), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1375379 Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98–110. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj Agarwal, N., Grottke, M., Mishra, S., & Brem, A. (2017). A systematic literature review of constraint-based innovations: state of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 64(1), 3–15. Agnew, J. A., Brown, L., & Herr, J. P. (1978). The community innovation process A conceptualization and empirical Analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(1), 3–30. Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). the Key To Success in Innovation * Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–225. Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B., & Monaghan, A. (2002). the Key To Success in Innovation * Part I: the Art of Interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206. Altenburg, T. (2009). Building Inclusive Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: Challenges for IS Research. In B. A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, & C. Chaminade (Eds.), Handbook on Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Context (pp. 33–57). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Amnesty International. (2017). 8 Things You Need to Know About Refugees in Uganda. Amnesty International. Kampala. Angot, J., & Ple, L. (2015). Serving poor people in rich countries: the bottom-of-the- pyramid business model solution. J. Bus. Strategy, 36(2), 3–15. Arua District Local Government. (2012). Arua District Local Government Statistital abstract. Arua. Arza, V., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2014). Innovation in informal settings but in which direction? The case of small cotton farming systems in Argentina. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.876801 Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2004). The geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation System. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ashkenas, R. (2015). There ’s a Difference Between cooperation and collaboration. Harvard Business Review, April, 1–5. Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management? In Dogson. M., D. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012 Ayala, C., León, L., Mican-Ruiz, K., Molina-soler, A., Niño-Zambrano, D., Reina-Rozo, J. D., … Suarez, D. (2019). Semillero de investigación/acción - Ingenio Sin Fronteras: Una apuesta con los territorios. In Anales do I Encontro Latino-americano de engenharia e sociedade (pp. 1–13). Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidad de Sao Paulo. Bahadur, A., & Doczi, J. (2016). Unlocking resilience through autonomous innovation (ODI Working Paper). London. Bajmócy, Z. (2013). Constructing a Local Innovation Index: Methodological Challenges Versus Statistical Data Availability. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 6(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-012-9080-5 Barber, L. (2014). (Re)Making Heritage Policy in Hong Kong: A Relational Politics of Global Knowledge and Local Innovation. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1179–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013495576 Barkin, D. (2019). Convivialty. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (pp. 136–139). Delhi, India: Tulika Books. Barkin, D., & Barón, L. (2005). Constructing alternatives to globalisation: Strengthening tradition through innovation. Development in Practice, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500041617 Baumüller, H. (2016). Agricultural Service Delivery Through Mobile Phones: Local Innovation and Technological Opportunities in Kenya. In F. Gatzweiler & J. von Braun (Eds.), Technological and Institutional Innovations for Marginalized Smallholders in Agricultural Development (First, pp. 143–162). Bonn. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25718-1_11 BEPA. (2010). Empowering people, driving change Social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg. Berdegué, J. (2005). Sistemas de innovación favorables a los pobres. Washington: International Fund for Agricultural Development. Betts, A. (2014). Innovation & refugees. Forced Migration Review, (September), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.06.021 Betts, A. (2018). What Europe could learn from the way Africa treats refugees. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/26/europe-learn-africa-refugees-solutions Betts, A., & Bloom, L. (2014). Humanitarian Innovation : The State of the Art. OCHA policy and studies series (Vol. 009). Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J., & Omata, N. (2014). Refugee economies Rethinking Popular Assumptions (Humanitarian Innovation Project). Oxford. Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J., & Omata, N. (2017). Refugee Economies Forced Displacement and Development (First). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/978–0–19–879568–1 Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Omata, N. (2012). Humanitarian innovation and refugee protection (No. 85). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6953-8 Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Weaver, N. (2015). Refugee Innovation: Humanitarian innovation that starts with communities. Humanitarian Innovation Project, 1–52. Betts, A., Chaara, I., Omata, N., & Sterck, O. (2019). Refugee Economies in Uganda : What Difference Does the Self-Reliance Model Make ? (Refugee Studies Centre). Oxford. Betts, B. A., & June, P. C. (2018). A self-reliance model for refugees. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/06/18/refugee-camp/?utm_term=.fc8fd300ec49 Bhaduri, S., & Kumar, H. (2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: Tracing the motivation of “grassroot” innovators in India. Mind and Society, 10(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-010-0081-2 Bhatti, Y. (2012). What is frugal, what is innovation? Towards a theory of frugal innovation. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620080804 Bilotta, G. S., Milner, A. M., & Boyd, I. (2014). On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010 Birtchnell, T. (2015). Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemporary South Asia, 19(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2011.569702 Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability - a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal in Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(1), 31–48. Bloom, L. (2015). Innovation spaces: Transforming humanitarian practice in the United Nations (Refugee Studies Centre). Oxford. Bloom, L. (2016). Creating an innovation ecosystem in Uganda for refugees. Bloom, L., & Betts, A. (2013). The two worlds of humanitarian innovation (Refugee Studies Centre (RSC) No. 94). Refugee Studies Centre (RSC). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554304 Bogers, M., & Lhuillery, S. (2006). Measuring informal innovation: From non-R&D to on-line knowledge production (No. 09). Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.2193/2004-007 Bollier, D. (2014). Think like a commoner. A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The wealth of the commons: a world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2015). Patterns of commoning. Amherst, MA: Off the Commons Books. Bookchin, M. (1999). La ecología de la libertad. Madrid: Madre Tierra. Booyens, I., Hart, T. G. B., & Ramoroka, K. H. (2018). Local Innovation Networking Dynamics: Evidence from South Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 30(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0123-2 Bound, K., & Thornton, I. (2012). Our frugal future: Lessons from India’s innovation system. Nesta, (July), 1–94. Branstetter, L. G. (2005). Do stronger patents induce more local innovation? Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.359 Brar, S., Farley, S. E., Hawkins, R., & Wagner, C. S. (2011). Science, Technology, and Innovation in Uganda (First). Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8672-9 Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001a). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems : A Critical Survey. Industrial and Corporate Change ·, 10(4), 975–1006. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001b). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft Revisited : A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept Steven Brint Gemeinschaft Revisited : A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept *. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12397 Brown, B., Nuberg, I., & Llewellyn, R. (2018). Research capacity for local innovation: the case of conservation agriculture in Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 24(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1439758 Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. New York: Harper. Budden, P., & Murray, F. (2015). Kendall Square & MIT : the Innovation Ecosystems and the University. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Caamaño, H., & Pascale, P. (2014). Innovación Ciudadana en Iberoamérica: participación digital para la transformación social. In Memorias del Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación (pp. 1–16). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Campbell, A. (2017). Lay Designers: Grassroots Innovation for Appropriate. Dessing Issues, 33(1), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320851 Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3 Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030 Carson, D. i. A., Cleary, J., de la Barre, S. ., Eimermann, M., & Marjavaara, R. (2016). New mobilities-new economies? Temporary populations and local innovation capacity in sparsely populated areas. In A. Taylor, L. Huskey, G. Saxinger, D. Carson, R. Rasmussen, & P. Ensign (Eds.), Settlements at the Edge: Remote Human Settlements in Developed Nations (First, pp. 178–206). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711962 Cassiolato, J. E., Zucoloto, G. F., Rapini, M. S., & de Souza, S. G. A. (2011). The recent evolution of the biotech local innovation system of Minas Gerais: University, local firms and transnational corporations. Biotechnology and Innovation Systems: The Role of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001424.00011 Castelo-Branco, L., Finucane, P., Marvão, P., McCrorie, P., Ponte, J., & Worley, P. (2016). Global sharing, local innovation: Four schools, four countries, one curriculum. Medical Teacher, 38(12), 1204–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181731 Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5). Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2018). Observatorio de memoria y conflicto. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/observatorio/ CEPAL. (1980). Seleccion de tecnologias apropiadas para los asentamientos humanos: una guia metodologica 30-10-497. Managua. CEPAL. (1981). Tecnologías apropiadas para el saneamiento básico. Lima. CEPAL. (1983). Guia metodológica para la selección de tecnologías apropiadas para los asentamientos humanos. Santiago de Chile. Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Social Innovation: Towards a Conceptualisation. In S. Majumdar, S. Guha, & N. Marakkath (Eds.), Technology and innovation for social change (pp. 7–34). New Delhi: Springer. Chomsky, N. (1967). The Responsibility of Intellectuals. The New York Review of Books. Chomsky, N. (2017). It is the Responsibility of Intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies (First). New York: The New Press. Coggio, T. (2018). Can Uganda’s Breakthrough Refugee-Hosting Model Be Sustained? Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/can-ugandas-breakthrough-refugee-hosting-model-be-sustained Colciencias. (1996). Colombia: al filo de la oportunidad. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Colciencias. (2018). Libro Verde 2030 Política Nacional de Ciencia e Innovación para el desarrollo sostenible. Colen, L., Turkelboom, F., Steenwinkel, S. Van, Ahmed, K. Al, Deckers, J., & Poesen, J. (2016). How the Soil Moves Upward in the Olive Orchards of Nw Syria : Sustainability Analysis of a Local Innovation. Land Degradation & Development, 426(November 2013), 416–426. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1990). Ley 29 de 1990. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1993a). Ley 70 de 1993. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1993b). Ley 99 de 1993. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1994). Ley 115 de 1994. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2009). Ley 1286 de 2009. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2011). Ley 1448 de 2011. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Diario Oficial. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2017). Acto Legislativo No. 01 of 2017. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2019). Ley 1951 de 2019. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Coque, J., González-Torres, P. L., Lopez-Mielgo, N., & Vázquez, D. (2014). Analysis of a local innovation system: Agents and network of relations. Dyna, 81(184), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n184.37249 Coro, G., & Micelli, S. (2007). The industrial districts as local innovation systems: Leader firms and new competitive advantages in Italian industry. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, (1), 41–67. Corsín Jiménez, A. (2014). The right to infrastructure: A prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13077p Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation in informal settings: reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.876803 Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153 Critchley, W., & Mutunga, K. (2003). Local innovation in a global context: Documenting farmer initiatives in land husbandry through WOCAT. Land Degradation and Development, 14(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.537 Critchley, W., Negi, G., & Brommer, M. (2008). Local Innovation in ‘Green Water’ Management. In D. Bossio & K. Geheb (Eds.), Conserving Land, Protecting Water (pp. 107–119). Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing. Dagnino, R. (Ed.). (2010). Tecnologia social Ferramienta para construir outra sociedade (Segunda). Campinas, SP: Komedi. Daniels, S. (2010). Making Do: Innovation in Kenya’s Informal Economy. San Francisco: Creative Commons. de Carvalho, G. D. G., de Carvalho, H. G., Cardoso, H. H. R., & Gonçalves, A. D. (2018). Assessing a Micro and Small Businesses Innovation Support Programme in Brazil: The Local Innovation Agents Programme. Journal of International Development, 30(6), 1064–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3387 De Paulo, A., Mello, C. J., do Nascimiento Filho, L., & Koracakis, T. (Eds.). (2004). Tecnologia social uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Banco do Brasil. de Santos Souza, B. (2009). Una epistemología del Sur. (CLACSO Coediciones, Ed.). México: Siglo XXI Editores. de Santos Souza, B. (2012). De las dualidades a las ecologías. La Paz, Bolivia: Red Boliviana de Mujeres Transformando la Economía. Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Roland Ortt, J. (2016). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774515060243 Defensoria del Pueblo. (2016). Problemática humanitaria en la Región Pacífica colombiana. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Demaria, F., & Kothari, A. (2017). The Post-Development Dictionary agenda : paths to the pluriverse The Post-Development Dictionary agenda : paths to the. Third World Quarterly, 6597(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350821 Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., & Martinez-alier, J. (2013). What is Degrowth ? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement. Environmental Values, (22), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194 Douthwaite, B. (2006). Enabling Innovation Technology - and System - Level Approaches that capitalize on complexety. Innovation, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.315.5810.297b Douthwaite, B., & Hoffecker, E. (2017). Towards a complexity-aware theory of change for participatory research programs working within agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 155(November 2015), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.002 Drivas, K., Economidou, C., Karkalakos, S., & Tsionas, E. G. (2016). Mobility of knowledge and local innovation activity. European Economic Review, 85, 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.01.008 Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013). Success factors of innovation ecosystems - Initial insights from a literature review *. CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co- Design in Innovation, 27–38. Dvir, R., & Pasher, E. (2004). Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410558756 Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. Dziemianowicz, W., Laskowska, A., & Peszat, K. (2017). Local innovation systems in Poland - the beginning of the road. Miscellanea Geographica, 21(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0024 Ecuru, J., & Kawooya, D. (2015). Effective Innovation Policies for Development: Uganda. In D. Soumitra, B. . Lanvin, & S. Wunsch-Vincent (Eds.), The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development (First, pp. 147–153). Cornell University. Ecuru, J., Trojer, L., Ziraba, Y., & Lating, P. (2012). Structure and Dynamics of Uganda’s Technological Innovation System. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 4(4), 255–274. Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012 Ehn, P., Nilsson, E., & Topgaard, R. (2014). Making futures Marginal notes on innovation, design and democracy (First). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Ely, A., Smith, A., Stirling, A., Building, J., Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Road, L. (2013). Innovation politics post-Rio+20: hybrid pathways to sustainability? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12285j Environmental Justice Foundation. (2017). BEYOND BORDERS: Our changing climate – its role in conflict and displacement. London. Escobar, A. (1998). La invención del Tercer Mundo: construcción y deconstrucción del desarrollo. Editorial Norma. Escobar, A. (2010). Una minga para el postdesarrollo: lugar, medio ambiente y movimientos sociales en las transformaciones globales. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Escobar, A. (2015). Degrowth , postdevelopment , and transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5 Escobar, A. (2017). Autonomía y diseño La realización de lo comunal (1ra ed.). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón. Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for pluriverse Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press. Estalella, A., Rocha, J., & Lafuente, A. (2013). Laboratorios de procomún : experimentación , recursividad y activismo. Revista Teknokultura, 10(1), 21–48. Esteva, G. (2015). Para sentipensar la comunalidad. Bajo El Volcán, 15(23), 171–186. Fabian, C., & Fabricant, R. (2014). The Ethics of Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (August), 1–8. Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford HandBook of Innovation (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008 Farzin, F. (2017). Localising the impact of techno-entrepreneurship in Eastern Iran: Birjand’s Science and Technology Park as a local innovation community. Local Economy, 32(7), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217734327 Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011 Fichter, K. (2009). Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in open innovation. R and D Management, 39(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00562.x Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.7 Franco, F. (2017). La sala de cine de Ciudad Bolívar que pasó de la ilusión a la realidad. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/potocine-la-sala-de-cine-de-ciudad-bolivar-45507. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 Franklin, T. (2018). OPM and UNHCR announce the preliminary results of the verification exercise. Retrieved June 2, 2019, from https://opm.go.ug/2018/11/08/opm-and-unhcr-announce-the-preliminary-results-of-the-verification-exercise/ Franz H-W, Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge social innovation. Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (First). Berlin: Springer. Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354 Fressoli, M., Smith, A., Thomas, H., & Bortz, G. (2015). De las Tecnologías Apropiadas a las Tecnologías Sociales : algunos dilemas persistentes de los movimientos alternativos de innovación Resumen. In T. Hernán, M. B. Albornoz, & F. Picabea (Eds.), Políticas tecnológicas y tecnologías Políticas (pp. 15–66). FLACSO Ecuador y Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Friis-Hansen, E., & Egelyng, H. (2006). Supporting local innovation for rural development. Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS. Frybourg, M. (1997). Conflict and Co-operation Between a Global Market and Local Innovations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.1997.9968528 Fulgencio, H., & Fever, H. Le. (2016). What is the social innovation system? A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 10(2/3), 434. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2016.074837 Fundación Chiyangua. (2017). Material pedagógico etnoeducativo Las azoteas un embrujo natural. Guapi, Cauca: ACNUR. Fundación Chiyangua. (2018). Entre Cuentos y Décimas: Contando la Experiencia “el Cuento De La Chiyangua.” Guapi, Cauca: Fundación Chiyangua. Fundacion Cibervoluntarios. (2015). Innovación ciudadana: Inteligencia Colectiva para empoderamiento Glocal. España: Publixed. FUNLEO. (2015). El oficio de la recolección de los frutos del Manglar c0mo herramienta etno-pedagógica. Bogotá: Ministerio de Cultura. FUNLEO, & Fundación ACUA. (2015). Antología culinaria de Guapi y Timbiquí Un Aporte a la Innovación de la Cocina Tradicional. (FUNLEO, Ed.). Bogota: FIDA. Gaitán-albarracín, N., Marmolejo, L., Vélez, J., & Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2018). Implicaciones de la Red Colombiana de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Social en el Posacuerdo Introducción. In Memorias del Coloquio Internacional LA CIUDAD – REGIÓN SOSTENIBLE COMO PROYECTO: DESAFÍOS ACTUALES. VISIONES CRUZADAS Y PERSPECTIVAS (pp. 188–192). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development and civilization. (International Peace Research Institute, Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066 Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research Principles and Practices (First). New York: Cambridge University Press. Giovannetti, E., & Piga, C. A. (2017). The contrasting effects of active and passive cooperation on innovation and productivity: Evidence from British local innovation networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.013 Goldstein, J. (2018). As Rich Nations Close the Door on Refugees, Uganda Welcomes Them. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/world/africa/uganda-refugees.html Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 González-Atehortua, C. F., & Vargas-Artunduaga, A. M. (2011). Diagnóstico y caracterización de la condición de vida de los habitantes del municipio de Guapí - Cauca. Universidad de la Salle. Governa, F., & Salone, C. (2005). Italy and European Spatial Policies: Polycentrism, Urban Networks and Local Innovation Practices. European Planning Studies, 13(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022014535 Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. (First). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gray, B. (1996). Cross-sectoral partners: Collaborative alliances among business, government and communities. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 57–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gray, B. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In D. Faulkner & M. de Rond (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business, and organizational issues (pp. 243–260). New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Grobbelaar, S. S. (Saartjie. (2018). Developing a local innovation ecosystem through a university coordinated innovation platform: The University of Fort Hare. Development Southern Africa, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902 Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86 Gudynas, E., & Acosta, A. (2011). La renovación de la crítica al desarrollo y el buen vivir como alternativa. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 16(53), 71–83. Guerrero, A. (2019). Comunalidad. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (First, pp. 130–133). Delhi, India: Tulika Books. Guimón, J. (2013). Developing Uganda’s Science , Technology, and Innovation System: The Millennium Science Initiative. Kampala. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2031.1208 Guo, W. (2009). Research on Innovation Ecosystem in IT Industry. 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2009 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia Acceso abierto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
389 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.sucursal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/1/1020744477.2019.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/2/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/3/license_rdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/4/1020744477.2019.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
65d525a4de15219522a55c0f6caf8788 6f3f13b02594d02ad110b3ad534cd5df 84a900c9dd4b2a10095a94649e1ce116 523a8de53ca03e6644f07369c6ac2bcd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814089715956056064 |
spelling |
Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de ColombiaAcceso abiertohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Peña-Reyes, José Ismael346c8005-ff63-4056-b323-cff3e53668b9-1Reina-Rozo, Juan David00e3afaf-4cb6-44b5-b89e-ae3e4265ae48Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e IndustrialGrupo de Investigación en Tecnologías e Innovación Comunitaria2020-01-29T19:21:38Z2020-01-29T19:21:38Z2020-01-27https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75535Innovation is a concept widely used in academia and the business world. However, it emerges intertwined with the profit-seeking and inequality inherent to the capitalist model which prioritizes the transactional over the relational. Inquiries into alternative innovation concepts have therefore aimed to create social value and assess an array of potential reformist and/or transformative effects. These alternatives, however, often fail to take into account ontologies and epistemologies of populations in diverse contexts and territories. The concept of communal innovation emerges out of these shortcomings, prioritizing the collaborative creation of common resources and resulting in the strengthening of the community and social fabric. The aforementioned collaboration occupies a central place in community processes of socio-technical change. The qualitative research presented here is based on two case studies rooted in post-agreement/post-conflict contexts in Guapi - Colombia and Aura - Uganda. The main objective is to explain the implications of collaboration on local innovation ecosystems in the territories of the Guajuí River Community Council in Guapi, and the Rhino Refugee Camp in Arua. The result is the systematization of the two community-based innovation ecosystems, as well as the highlighting of key actors, their roles, relations and the environment in which they develop, including its values, knowledge, public policies, natural environment and infrastructure. Finally, the conclusions illustrate how the collaboration processes in these case studies undergo decision-making-based governance, the creation of shared norms, authentic reciprocity, the autonomy of organizations and the construction of trust through initiatives of socio-technical change, especially those centered on resilience and co-existence.La innovación es un concepto sumamente usado en la academia y en el mundo empresarial. No obstante, emerge ligado a la búsqueda de lucro y la desigualdad inherente en el modelo económico capitalista, resaltando lo transaccional sobre lo relacional. Ante esto, se indagan diversos conceptos de innovación alternativa para la creación de valor social y sus efectos reformistas o transformadores. Sin embargo, estos conceptos alternativos no toman en cuenta diversas ontologías y epistemologías de las poblaciones en diversos territorios. Así emerge la innovación comunal como un concepto que prima la colaboración para la generación de bienes comunes resultando en el fortalecimiento del tejido social y de la comunalidad. Por lo tanto, la colaboración se sitúa en un lugar central en procesos comunitarios de cambio socio-técnico. En este sentido, esta investigación cualitativa se basa en dos estudios de caso embebidos en contextos de pos-acuerdo/posconflicto realizados en Guapi – Colombia y Arua – Uganda. El principal objetivo es explicar las implicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local en los territorios del Consejo Comunitario del Río Guajuí en Guapi y el Campo de Refugiados Rhino en Arua. Los resultados son la sistematización de los dos ecosistemas de innovación de base comunitaria en los respectivos contextos, visibilizando los principales actores, sus roles, sus relaciones y el entorno donde se desenvuelven, incluyendo sus valores, saberes, políticas públicas, entorno natural e infraestructuras. Finalmente, las conclusiones ilustran cómo los procesos de colaboración en estos escenarios pasan por la gobernanza de las decisiones, la creación de normas compartidas, la reciprocidad auténtica, la autonomía de las organizaciones y la construcción de confianza a través de iniciativas de cambio socio-técnico, en especial centradas en la resiliencia y la co-existencia.Doctor en Ingeniería – Industria y Organizaciones .389application/pdfspaIngeniería y operaciones afinesCambio socio-técnico; Innovación Comunal; Colaboración; Ecosistemas de Innovación de Base Comunitaria; Colombia; UgandaSocio-technical change; Communal Innovation; Collaboration; Community-based Innovation EcosystemsImplicaciones de la colaboración en ecosistemas de innovación local. Estudio de caso múltiple en Uganda y ColombiaImplications of collaboration in local innovation ecosystems. Multiple case study in Uganda and Colombia.Documento de trabajoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fchttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTCASOUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede BogotáUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede BogotáAapaoja, A., & Leviäkangas, P. (2015). Local innovation system in northern Finland - case renewable energy solutions pilots in oulu. International Journal of Technology, 6(5), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i5.1230 Acosta, A. (2012). Buen vivir-Sumak kawsay: Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Quito: AbyaYala. Acosta, A. (2015). El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo . Algunas reflexiones económicas y no tan económicas. Política y Sociedad, 52(2), 299–330. Acosta, A. (2017). Living Well : ideas for reinventing the future. Third World Quarterly, 6597(November), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1375379 Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98–110. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj Agarwal, N., Grottke, M., Mishra, S., & Brem, A. (2017). A systematic literature review of constraint-based innovations: state of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 64(1), 3–15. Agnew, J. A., Brown, L., & Herr, J. P. (1978). The community innovation process A conceptualization and empirical Analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(1), 3–30. Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). the Key To Success in Innovation * Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207–225. Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B., & Monaghan, A. (2002). the Key To Success in Innovation * Part I: the Art of Interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206. Altenburg, T. (2009). Building Inclusive Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: Challenges for IS Research. In B. A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, & C. Chaminade (Eds.), Handbook on Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Context (pp. 33–57). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Amnesty International. (2017). 8 Things You Need to Know About Refugees in Uganda. Amnesty International. Kampala. Angot, J., & Ple, L. (2015). Serving poor people in rich countries: the bottom-of-the- pyramid business model solution. J. Bus. Strategy, 36(2), 3–15. Arua District Local Government. (2012). Arua District Local Government Statistital abstract. Arua. Arza, V., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2014). Innovation in informal settings but in which direction? The case of small cotton farming systems in Argentina. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.876801 Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2004). The geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation System. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ashkenas, R. (2015). There ’s a Difference Between cooperation and collaboration. Harvard Business Review, April, 1–5. Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management? In Dogson. M., D. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012 Ayala, C., León, L., Mican-Ruiz, K., Molina-soler, A., Niño-Zambrano, D., Reina-Rozo, J. D., … Suarez, D. (2019). Semillero de investigación/acción - Ingenio Sin Fronteras: Una apuesta con los territorios. In Anales do I Encontro Latino-americano de engenharia e sociedade (pp. 1–13). Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidad de Sao Paulo. Bahadur, A., & Doczi, J. (2016). Unlocking resilience through autonomous innovation (ODI Working Paper). London. Bajmócy, Z. (2013). Constructing a Local Innovation Index: Methodological Challenges Versus Statistical Data Availability. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 6(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-012-9080-5 Barber, L. (2014). (Re)Making Heritage Policy in Hong Kong: A Relational Politics of Global Knowledge and Local Innovation. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1179–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013495576 Barkin, D. (2019). Convivialty. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (pp. 136–139). Delhi, India: Tulika Books. Barkin, D., & Barón, L. (2005). Constructing alternatives to globalisation: Strengthening tradition through innovation. Development in Practice, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500041617 Baumüller, H. (2016). Agricultural Service Delivery Through Mobile Phones: Local Innovation and Technological Opportunities in Kenya. In F. Gatzweiler & J. von Braun (Eds.), Technological and Institutional Innovations for Marginalized Smallholders in Agricultural Development (First, pp. 143–162). Bonn. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25718-1_11 BEPA. (2010). Empowering people, driving change Social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg. Berdegué, J. (2005). Sistemas de innovación favorables a los pobres. Washington: International Fund for Agricultural Development. Betts, A. (2014). Innovation & refugees. Forced Migration Review, (September), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.06.021 Betts, A. (2018). What Europe could learn from the way Africa treats refugees. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/26/europe-learn-africa-refugees-solutions Betts, A., & Bloom, L. (2014). Humanitarian Innovation : The State of the Art. OCHA policy and studies series (Vol. 009). Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J., & Omata, N. (2014). Refugee economies Rethinking Popular Assumptions (Humanitarian Innovation Project). Oxford. Betts, A., Bloom, L., Kaplan, J., & Omata, N. (2017). Refugee Economies Forced Displacement and Development (First). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/978–0–19–879568–1 Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Omata, N. (2012). Humanitarian innovation and refugee protection (No. 85). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6953-8 Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Weaver, N. (2015). Refugee Innovation: Humanitarian innovation that starts with communities. Humanitarian Innovation Project, 1–52. Betts, A., Chaara, I., Omata, N., & Sterck, O. (2019). Refugee Economies in Uganda : What Difference Does the Self-Reliance Model Make ? (Refugee Studies Centre). Oxford. Betts, B. A., & June, P. C. (2018). A self-reliance model for refugees. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/06/18/refugee-camp/?utm_term=.fc8fd300ec49 Bhaduri, S., & Kumar, H. (2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: Tracing the motivation of “grassroot” innovators in India. Mind and Society, 10(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-010-0081-2 Bhatti, Y. (2012). What is frugal, what is innovation? Towards a theory of frugal innovation. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620080804 Bilotta, G. S., Milner, A. M., & Boyd, I. (2014). On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010 Birtchnell, T. (2015). Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemporary South Asia, 19(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2011.569702 Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability - a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal in Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(1), 31–48. Bloom, L. (2015). Innovation spaces: Transforming humanitarian practice in the United Nations (Refugee Studies Centre). Oxford. Bloom, L. (2016). Creating an innovation ecosystem in Uganda for refugees. Bloom, L., & Betts, A. (2013). The two worlds of humanitarian innovation (Refugee Studies Centre (RSC) No. 94). Refugee Studies Centre (RSC). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554304 Bogers, M., & Lhuillery, S. (2006). Measuring informal innovation: From non-R&D to on-line knowledge production (No. 09). Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.2193/2004-007 Bollier, D. (2014). Think like a commoner. A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The wealth of the commons: a world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2015). Patterns of commoning. Amherst, MA: Off the Commons Books. Bookchin, M. (1999). La ecología de la libertad. Madrid: Madre Tierra. Booyens, I., Hart, T. G. B., & Ramoroka, K. H. (2018). Local Innovation Networking Dynamics: Evidence from South Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 30(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0123-2 Bound, K., & Thornton, I. (2012). Our frugal future: Lessons from India’s innovation system. Nesta, (July), 1–94. Branstetter, L. G. (2005). Do stronger patents induce more local innovation? Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.359 Brar, S., Farley, S. E., Hawkins, R., & Wagner, C. S. (2011). Science, Technology, and Innovation in Uganda (First). Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8672-9 Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001a). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems : A Critical Survey. Industrial and Corporate Change ·, 10(4), 975–1006. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001b). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft Revisited : A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept Steven Brint Gemeinschaft Revisited : A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept *. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12397 Brown, B., Nuberg, I., & Llewellyn, R. (2018). Research capacity for local innovation: the case of conservation agriculture in Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 24(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1439758 Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. New York: Harper. Budden, P., & Murray, F. (2015). Kendall Square & MIT : the Innovation Ecosystems and the University. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Caamaño, H., & Pascale, P. (2014). Innovación Ciudadana en Iberoamérica: participación digital para la transformación social. In Memorias del Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación (pp. 1–16). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Campbell, A. (2017). Lay Designers: Grassroots Innovation for Appropriate. Dessing Issues, 33(1), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320851 Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3 Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B., & Hodge, H. (2014). Understanding local innovation systems in peripheral tourism destinations. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.868030 Carson, D. i. A., Cleary, J., de la Barre, S. ., Eimermann, M., & Marjavaara, R. (2016). New mobilities-new economies? Temporary populations and local innovation capacity in sparsely populated areas. In A. Taylor, L. Huskey, G. Saxinger, D. Carson, R. Rasmussen, & P. Ensign (Eds.), Settlements at the Edge: Remote Human Settlements in Developed Nations (First, pp. 178–206). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711962 Cassiolato, J. E., Zucoloto, G. F., Rapini, M. S., & de Souza, S. G. A. (2011). The recent evolution of the biotech local innovation system of Minas Gerais: University, local firms and transnational corporations. Biotechnology and Innovation Systems: The Role of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001424.00011 Castelo-Branco, L., Finucane, P., Marvão, P., McCrorie, P., Ponte, J., & Worley, P. (2016). Global sharing, local innovation: Four schools, four countries, one curriculum. Medical Teacher, 38(12), 1204–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181731 Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5). Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2018). Observatorio de memoria y conflicto. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/observatorio/ CEPAL. (1980). Seleccion de tecnologias apropiadas para los asentamientos humanos: una guia metodologica 30-10-497. Managua. CEPAL. (1981). Tecnologías apropiadas para el saneamiento básico. Lima. CEPAL. (1983). Guia metodológica para la selección de tecnologías apropiadas para los asentamientos humanos. Santiago de Chile. Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Social Innovation: Towards a Conceptualisation. In S. Majumdar, S. Guha, & N. Marakkath (Eds.), Technology and innovation for social change (pp. 7–34). New Delhi: Springer. Chomsky, N. (1967). The Responsibility of Intellectuals. The New York Review of Books. Chomsky, N. (2017). It is the Responsibility of Intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies (First). New York: The New Press. Coggio, T. (2018). Can Uganda’s Breakthrough Refugee-Hosting Model Be Sustained? Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/can-ugandas-breakthrough-refugee-hosting-model-be-sustained Colciencias. (1996). Colombia: al filo de la oportunidad. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Colciencias. (2018). Libro Verde 2030 Política Nacional de Ciencia e Innovación para el desarrollo sostenible. Colen, L., Turkelboom, F., Steenwinkel, S. Van, Ahmed, K. Al, Deckers, J., & Poesen, J. (2016). How the Soil Moves Upward in the Olive Orchards of Nw Syria : Sustainability Analysis of a Local Innovation. Land Degradation & Development, 426(November 2013), 416–426. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1990). Ley 29 de 1990. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1993a). Ley 70 de 1993. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1993b). Ley 99 de 1993. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1994). Ley 115 de 1994. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2009). Ley 1286 de 2009. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2011). Ley 1448 de 2011. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Diario Oficial. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2017). Acto Legislativo No. 01 of 2017. Diario Oficial. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2019). Ley 1951 de 2019. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Coque, J., González-Torres, P. L., Lopez-Mielgo, N., & Vázquez, D. (2014). Analysis of a local innovation system: Agents and network of relations. Dyna, 81(184), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n184.37249 Coro, G., & Micelli, S. (2007). The industrial districts as local innovation systems: Leader firms and new competitive advantages in Italian industry. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, (1), 41–67. Corsín Jiménez, A. (2014). The right to infrastructure: A prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13077p Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation in informal settings: reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.876803 Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153 Critchley, W., & Mutunga, K. (2003). Local innovation in a global context: Documenting farmer initiatives in land husbandry through WOCAT. Land Degradation and Development, 14(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.537 Critchley, W., Negi, G., & Brommer, M. (2008). Local Innovation in ‘Green Water’ Management. In D. Bossio & K. Geheb (Eds.), Conserving Land, Protecting Water (pp. 107–119). Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing. Dagnino, R. (Ed.). (2010). Tecnologia social Ferramienta para construir outra sociedade (Segunda). Campinas, SP: Komedi. Daniels, S. (2010). Making Do: Innovation in Kenya’s Informal Economy. San Francisco: Creative Commons. de Carvalho, G. D. G., de Carvalho, H. G., Cardoso, H. H. R., & Gonçalves, A. D. (2018). Assessing a Micro and Small Businesses Innovation Support Programme in Brazil: The Local Innovation Agents Programme. Journal of International Development, 30(6), 1064–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3387 De Paulo, A., Mello, C. J., do Nascimiento Filho, L., & Koracakis, T. (Eds.). (2004). Tecnologia social uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Banco do Brasil. de Santos Souza, B. (2009). Una epistemología del Sur. (CLACSO Coediciones, Ed.). México: Siglo XXI Editores. de Santos Souza, B. (2012). De las dualidades a las ecologías. La Paz, Bolivia: Red Boliviana de Mujeres Transformando la Economía. Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Roland Ortt, J. (2016). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774515060243 Defensoria del Pueblo. (2016). Problemática humanitaria en la Región Pacífica colombiana. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Demaria, F., & Kothari, A. (2017). The Post-Development Dictionary agenda : paths to the pluriverse The Post-Development Dictionary agenda : paths to the. Third World Quarterly, 6597(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350821 Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., & Martinez-alier, J. (2013). What is Degrowth ? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement. Environmental Values, (22), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194 Douthwaite, B. (2006). Enabling Innovation Technology - and System - Level Approaches that capitalize on complexety. Innovation, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.315.5810.297b Douthwaite, B., & Hoffecker, E. (2017). Towards a complexity-aware theory of change for participatory research programs working within agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 155(November 2015), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.002 Drivas, K., Economidou, C., Karkalakos, S., & Tsionas, E. G. (2016). Mobility of knowledge and local innovation activity. European Economic Review, 85, 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.01.008 Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013). Success factors of innovation ecosystems - Initial insights from a literature review *. CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co- Design in Innovation, 27–38. Dvir, R., & Pasher, E. (2004). Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410558756 Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. Dziemianowicz, W., Laskowska, A., & Peszat, K. (2017). Local innovation systems in Poland - the beginning of the road. Miscellanea Geographica, 21(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0024 Ecuru, J., & Kawooya, D. (2015). Effective Innovation Policies for Development: Uganda. In D. Soumitra, B. . Lanvin, & S. Wunsch-Vincent (Eds.), The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development (First, pp. 147–153). Cornell University. Ecuru, J., Trojer, L., Ziraba, Y., & Lating, P. (2012). Structure and Dynamics of Uganda’s Technological Innovation System. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 4(4), 255–274. Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012 Ehn, P., Nilsson, E., & Topgaard, R. (2014). Making futures Marginal notes on innovation, design and democracy (First). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Ely, A., Smith, A., Stirling, A., Building, J., Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Road, L. (2013). Innovation politics post-Rio+20: hybrid pathways to sustainability? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12285j Environmental Justice Foundation. (2017). BEYOND BORDERS: Our changing climate – its role in conflict and displacement. London. Escobar, A. (1998). La invención del Tercer Mundo: construcción y deconstrucción del desarrollo. Editorial Norma. Escobar, A. (2010). Una minga para el postdesarrollo: lugar, medio ambiente y movimientos sociales en las transformaciones globales. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Escobar, A. (2015). Degrowth , postdevelopment , and transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0297-5 Escobar, A. (2017). Autonomía y diseño La realización de lo comunal (1ra ed.). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón. Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for pluriverse Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press. Estalella, A., Rocha, J., & Lafuente, A. (2013). Laboratorios de procomún : experimentación , recursividad y activismo. Revista Teknokultura, 10(1), 21–48. Esteva, G. (2015). Para sentipensar la comunalidad. Bajo El Volcán, 15(23), 171–186. Fabian, C., & Fabricant, R. (2014). The Ethics of Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (August), 1–8. Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford HandBook of Innovation (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008 Farzin, F. (2017). Localising the impact of techno-entrepreneurship in Eastern Iran: Birjand’s Science and Technology Park as a local innovation community. Local Economy, 32(7), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217734327 Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011 Fichter, K. (2009). Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in open innovation. R and D Management, 39(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00562.x Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.7 Franco, F. (2017). La sala de cine de Ciudad Bolívar que pasó de la ilusión a la realidad. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/potocine-la-sala-de-cine-de-ciudad-bolivar-45507. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 Franklin, T. (2018). OPM and UNHCR announce the preliminary results of the verification exercise. Retrieved June 2, 2019, from https://opm.go.ug/2018/11/08/opm-and-unhcr-announce-the-preliminary-results-of-the-verification-exercise/ Franz H-W, Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge social innovation. Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (First). Berlin: Springer. Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354 Fressoli, M., Smith, A., Thomas, H., & Bortz, G. (2015). De las Tecnologías Apropiadas a las Tecnologías Sociales : algunos dilemas persistentes de los movimientos alternativos de innovación Resumen. In T. Hernán, M. B. Albornoz, & F. Picabea (Eds.), Políticas tecnológicas y tecnologías Políticas (pp. 15–66). FLACSO Ecuador y Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Friis-Hansen, E., & Egelyng, H. (2006). Supporting local innovation for rural development. Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS. Frybourg, M. (1997). Conflict and Co-operation Between a Global Market and Local Innovations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.1997.9968528 Fulgencio, H., & Fever, H. Le. (2016). What is the social innovation system? A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 10(2/3), 434. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2016.074837 Fundación Chiyangua. (2017). Material pedagógico etnoeducativo Las azoteas un embrujo natural. Guapi, Cauca: ACNUR. Fundación Chiyangua. (2018). Entre Cuentos y Décimas: Contando la Experiencia “el Cuento De La Chiyangua.” Guapi, Cauca: Fundación Chiyangua. Fundacion Cibervoluntarios. (2015). Innovación ciudadana: Inteligencia Colectiva para empoderamiento Glocal. España: Publixed. FUNLEO. (2015). El oficio de la recolección de los frutos del Manglar c0mo herramienta etno-pedagógica. Bogotá: Ministerio de Cultura. FUNLEO, & Fundación ACUA. (2015). Antología culinaria de Guapi y Timbiquí Un Aporte a la Innovación de la Cocina Tradicional. (FUNLEO, Ed.). Bogota: FIDA. Gaitán-albarracín, N., Marmolejo, L., Vélez, J., & Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2018). Implicaciones de la Red Colombiana de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Social en el Posacuerdo Introducción. In Memorias del Coloquio Internacional LA CIUDAD – REGIÓN SOSTENIBLE COMO PROYECTO: DESAFÍOS ACTUALES. VISIONES CRUZADAS Y PERSPECTIVAS (pp. 188–192). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development and civilization. (International Peace Research Institute, Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066 Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research Principles and Practices (First). New York: Cambridge University Press. Giovannetti, E., & Piga, C. A. (2017). The contrasting effects of active and passive cooperation on innovation and productivity: Evidence from British local innovation networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.013 Goldstein, J. (2018). As Rich Nations Close the Door on Refugees, Uganda Welcomes Them. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/world/africa/uganda-refugees.html Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 González-Atehortua, C. F., & Vargas-Artunduaga, A. M. (2011). Diagnóstico y caracterización de la condición de vida de los habitantes del municipio de Guapí - Cauca. Universidad de la Salle. Governa, F., & Salone, C. (2005). Italy and European Spatial Policies: Polycentrism, Urban Networks and Local Innovation Practices. European Planning Studies, 13(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022014535 Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. (First). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gray, B. (1996). Cross-sectoral partners: Collaborative alliances among business, government and communities. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 57–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gray, B. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In D. Faulkner & M. de Rond (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business, and organizational issues (pp. 243–260). New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Grobbelaar, S. S. (Saartjie. (2018). Developing a local innovation ecosystem through a university coordinated innovation platform: The University of Fort Hare. Development Southern Africa, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902 Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86 Gudynas, E., & Acosta, A. (2011). La renovación de la crítica al desarrollo y el buen vivir como alternativa. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 16(53), 71–83. Guerrero, A. (2019). Comunalidad. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (First, pp. 130–133). Delhi, India: Tulika Books. Guimón, J. (2013). Developing Uganda’s Science , Technology, and Innovation System: The Millennium Science Initiative. Kampala. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2031.1208 Guo, W. (2009). Research on Innovation Ecosystem in IT Industry. 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2009, 6004–6007. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2009.5195277 Gupta, A. (1997). The Honey Bee Network: Linking knowledge-rich grassroots innovations. Development, 40(4), 36–40. Gupta, A. (2000). Grassroots innovations for survival. Ileia, July(July), 5–6. Gupta, A. (2012). Innovations for the poor by the poor. International Journal in Tecnological Learning, Innovation and Development., 5(1/2), 28–39. Gupta, A. (2013). Tapping the entrepreneurial potential of grassroots innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer. Gupta, A. (2014). Frugal Innovation Is Not Just about Affordability. Gupta, A. (2016). Grassroots Innovation: minds on the margin are not marginal minds. Gupta, A., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P., … Vivekanandan, P. (2003). Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35(9), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00053-3 Guston, D. H., Fisher, E., Grunwald, A., Owen, R., Swierstra, T., & Burg, S. Van Der. (2014). Responsible innovation : motivations for a new journal. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.885175 Hakiza, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship and innovation by refugees in Uganda. Forced Migration Review, 1, 18–19. Hale, G. A. (1996). Managing for Innovation. R&D Innovator, 5(10), 5–8. Hansen, R. (2018). The Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework : A Commentary. Journal of Refugee Studies, 31(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey020 Harris, M., & Albury, D. (2009). The innovation imperative. Nesta (Vol. 21). London. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v21n01_28 Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. (2015). We Mobilized Ourselves Community Resilience in Areas Impacted by the Lord’s Resistance Army. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. (2019). Insights: The Impact of the LRA. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://hhi.harvard.edu/research/insights-impact-of-lra#intro Hathaway, M., & Boff, L. (2009). The Tao of liberation: exploring the ecology of transformation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.928982 Heemskerk, W., Lema, N., Wennink, B., & Gotoechan-Hodounou, H. (2012). Alternative funding mechanisms for local innovation systems. In Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers Livelihoods (pp. 203–219). Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2005). Welfare Implications of User Innovation, 45–59. Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons : from theory to practice. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. (2003). The relationship between internal and external cooperation: literature review and propositions. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 735–744. Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. (2004). Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: an exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 110–122. Hochgerner, J. (2011). Social Innovation. Enciclopedy of Creativity, (2006), 1678–1686. Hoffecker, E. (2018a). Local Innovation : what it is and why it matters for developing economies (New Directions In Innovation Research No. 1). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Hoffecker, E. (2018b). Why cultivating your innovation ecosystem Is worth the work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–6. Hoffecker, E. (2019). Understanding innovation ecosystems Framework for Joint Analysis and Action. Cambridge Mass. Hoffecker, E., Leith, K., & Kim, W. (2015). The Lean Research Framework: Principles for Human-Centered Field Research. Boston, MA. Hossain, M. (2016). Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137(September 2015), 973–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.140 Hossain, M. (2017). Mapping the frugal innovation phenomenon. Technology in Society, 51, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.006 Hossain, M. (2018). Grassroots innovation: The state of the art and future perspectives. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.008 Hossain, M., Simula, H., & Halme, M. (2016). Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations. Technology in Society, 46, 132–139. Hovil, L. (2007). Self-settled Refugees in Uganda : An Alternative Approach to Displacement? Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem035 Hovil, L. (2018). Uganda’s refugee policies: The history, the politics, the way forward. Kampala. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2942414 Hovil, L., & Werker, E. (2001). Refugees in Arua District: A human security analysis. (Refugee Law Project Working No. 3). Kampala. Huanacuni, F. (2010). Buen Vivir / Vivir Bien Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales andinas (Primera). Lima: Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas – CAOI. Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Huxham, C. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity, and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human Relations, 53, 771–801. Ibrahim, H., Mormont, M., & Yamba, B. (2014). Local innovations and initiatives in the management of conflicts and health risks in agro-pastoral zones: the SAREL and PASEL projects in the Dakoro, department in Niger. Field Actions Science Reports, 11(11), 0–8. IDEA. (2013). Informe salida de campo Ecosistemas y Sociedad. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. IDIN. (2017). Local Innovation Ecosystem. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://www.idin.org/blog-news-events/blog/what-local-innovation-ecosystem IIAP., & Consejo Comunitario del Río Guajuí. (2017). Estudio de germoplasma de hierbas medicinales en el corregimiento de San Antonio, Guapi. Guapi, Cauca. IIAP., & Construyendo Sueños. (2017). Identificación y caracterización de lugares de reproducción de Bibalvos, Unibalvos y Crustáceos en la costa pacífica Caucana. Quibdo, Chocó. IIAP., & Fundación Chiyangua. (2017). Evaluación del comportamiento agronómico y el potencial nutritivo de la Papa China bajo condiciones agro-alimentarias y edafíticas del municipio de Guapi. Guapi, Cauca. IIAP. (2011). Aportes al conocimiento de los ecosistemas estratégicos y las espeicies de interés especial del Chocó Biogeográfico. Santiago de Cali. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Calder and Bacon. Instituto geográfico Agustin Codazzi. (2008). Mapa consejos comunitarios - Guapi. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Instituto Geográfico Agustin Codazzi. IPBES. (2018). Land Degradation and Restoration Assessment. Medellin. Jackson, D. J. (2012). What is an Innovation Ecosystem? National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G., & Salazar, M. (2001). MANUAL DE BOGOTÁ Innovación Tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar Pub. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809993 Jha, S. K., & Krishnan, R. T. (2013). Local innovation: The key to globalisation. IIMB Management Review, 25(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2013.07.002 Jimenez, A., & Roberts, T. (2019). Decolonising Neo-Liberal Innovation : Using the Andean Philosophy of ‘ Buen Vivir ’ to Reimagine Innovation Hubs. In P. Nielsen & H. Kimaro (Eds.), 2019 International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (Vol. 1, pp. 180–191). Dar es Salaam: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3 Jishnu, V., Gilhotra, R., & Mishra, D. (2011). Pharmacy education in India: strategies for a better future. Journal of Young Pharmacists : JYP, 3(4), 334–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.90248 Kahl, A., & Puig Larrauri, H. (2013). Technology for Peacebuilding. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 2(3), 1–15. Kaiser, T. (2005). Participating in Development? Refugee protection, politics and developmental approaches to refugee management in Uganda. Third World Quarterly, 26(2), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000339155 Karnani, A. (2007). The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Review Management, 49(4), 90–111. Katz, B., & Turner, M. A. (2007). Rethinking U.S. rental housing policy: Build on state and local innovations. Opportunity 08: Independent Ideas for America’s Next President. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1 Kigozi, D. (2017). The Reality Behind Uganda’s Refugee Model. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.newsdeeply.com/refugees/community/2017/05/30/the-reality-behind-ugandas-glowing-reputation Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Engineering, 2, 1051. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500 Kitchenhama, B. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 Kline, S., & Rosemberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosemberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing Technlogy of Economic Growth (pp. 275–304). Washington: National Academy Press. Klochikhin, E. A. (2012). Linking Development and Innovation : What Does Technological Change Bring to the Society ? European Journal of Development Research, 24(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2011.20 Koehler, K. A. (2017). Inducing phase transitions in local innovation networks: Implications for state economic development. Local Economy, 32(8), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217739370 Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a Decade of Research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BOP) Concept. Business and Society, 53(3), 338–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312474928 Koslosky, M. A., Speroni, R. de M., & Gauthier, O. (2015). Ecossistemas de inovação – Uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Espacios, 36(No 03), 1–17. Kothari, A. (2014). Radical Ecological Democracy : A Path Forward for India and Beyond. Great Transition Initiative. Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse A post-development dictionary (First). Delhi, India: Tulika Books. Kozar, O. (2010). Towards better group work: Seeing the difference between cooperation and collaboration. English Teaching Forum, 2, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88722-7 Krause, L. (2016). The creation of a local innovation ecosystem in Japan for nurturing global entrepreneurs. In The Economics of Ecology, Exchange, and Adaptation: Anthropological Explorations (pp. 253–283). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120160000036010 Krause, L. N. (2016). The Creation of a Local Innovation Ecosystem in Japan for Nurturing Global Entrepreneurs. The Economics of Ecology, Exchange, and Adaptation: Anthropological Explorations, 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120160000036010 Kroc Institute. (2018). Report Two: State of Implementation of the Colombian Peace Agreement. Kumar, H., & Bhaduri, S. (2014). Jugaad to grassroot innovations : understanding the landscape of the informal sector innovations in India. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 6(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.895481 Laferrière, E., & Stoett, P. (1999). International Relations Theory and Ecological Thought: Towards a Synthesis. New York: Routledge. Lafuente, A. (2016). Los imaginarios del Laboratorio (ciudadano). Madrid. Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2002). Does Social Capital Determine Innovation ? To What Extent ? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 1–25. Laurel, B. (Ed.). (2003). Design Research: Methods and Perspectives. (First). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Leary, J. P. (2019a). Keywords: The new language of capitalism (First). New York: Haymarket Books. Leary, J. P. (2019b). The Innovation Cult. Jacobin Magazine. Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking Questions: techniques for semestructured interviews. Journal Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665–668. Leff, E. (2004a). Racionalidad Ambiental La reapropiación social de la naturaleza (Primera). México D.F: Siglo XXI Editores. Leff, E. (2004b). Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes. Polis Revista Latinoaméricana, 7, 2–29. León, A. L., & Molina-Soler, A. (2018). Cátedra Ingenio, Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, una experiencia de ingeniería humanitaria. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 6(1), 37–46. Levitt Cea, J., & Rimington, J. (2017). Creating Breakout Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16, 1–16. Lewis, V., & Mulvany, P. M. (1997). A typology of community seed banks. Natural Resources Institute University of Greenwich UK. Links, M. L., Hart, T., & Jacobs, P. (2014). The dynamics of local innovations among formal and informal enterprises: Stories from rural South Africa. African Journal of Science , Technology , Innovation and Development, 6(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.940168 Llamazares, M., & Mulloy, K. (2014). Unicef in Uganda: Using Technology-Based Innovations to Advance Peacebuilding. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 9(3), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2014.982066 London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113. London, T., & Hart, S. (2011). Next Generation Business Strategies for the BoP. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1270 Longo, R. (2006). Los retos de la innovación para la población rural pobre. Lundvall, B. (1988). Innovation as an Interactive Process: from User-Producer interaction to the National Sistem of Innovation. In G. Dosi & et al. (Eds.), Technical change and Economic Theory. (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter. Lundvall, B. (1992). National Innovation System: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter. Lynn, L. H., Reddy, N. M., & Aram, J. D. (1996). Linking technology and institutions: The innovation community framework. Research Policy, 25(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00817-5 Mahmood, I. P., & Zheng, W. (2009). Whether and how: Effects of international joint ventures on local innovation in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 38(9), 1489–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.003 Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press. Marsden, P. V. (1970). Community Structure and Innovation: The Case of Urban Renewal. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412444721 Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008a). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 10(2–3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.183 Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008b). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 10(2–3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.183 Martínez-Torres, M. E., & Rosset, P. M. (2014). Diálogo de saberes in La Vía Campesina: food sovereignty and agroecology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.872632 Martínez Luna, J. (2017). Comunalidad... camino que se hace... al andar. México D.F. Martinez, M., Serrano, A., Montoya, L., & Montoya, I. (2017). La metáfora biológica como metodología de aprendizaje organizacional. El caso de los ecosistemas de innovación. Espacios, 38(43), 18. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., … Waterfield, T. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,. Geneva, Switzerland. Mattei, U. (2013). Bienes comunes: un manifiesto. Madrid: Trotta. McCarthy, K. (2010). The Ecology of Innovation. Peterborough. McDonald, S. M., Sandvik, K. B., & Jacobsen, K. L. (2017). From Principle to Practice : Humanitarian Innovation and Experimentation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 1–5. McKeon, N. (2015). La Via Campesina: The “Peasants” Way’ to Changing the System, not the Climate. Journal of World-Systems Research, 21(2), 241–249. McPherson, A. H., & McDonald, S. M. (2005). Local innovation support in Scotland: policy lessons from Glasgow. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 2(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2005.007595 Mercan, B., & Gotkas, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76(76), 102–112. Merriam-webster. (2019a). Definition of collaborate. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collaboration Merriam-webster. (2019b). Definition of cooperation. Retrieved September 19, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cooperation Miklian, J., & Hoelscher, K. (2018). A new research approach for Peace Innovation A new research approach for Peace Innovation. Innovation and Development, 8(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1349580 Miles, R., Snow, C., & Miles, G. (2000). The future.org. Long Range Planning, 33, 300–321. Ministerio de Cultura. (2015). Saberes & Sabores del Pacífico Colombiano Guapi - Quibdó. Santiago de Cali: Ministerio de Cultura. Ministerio del Interior. (2017). Plan de caracterización del Consejo Comunitario Rio Guajuí - Guapi. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Ministry of Finance, P. and E. D. (2009). National science, technology and innovation policy. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. Miniterio de Cultura. (2015). Saberes y sabores de las comidas de Semana santa en el municipio de Guapi, Cauca. Bogota: Ministerio de Cultura. Minstrom, M. (2007). Policy Design for Local Innovation: The Effects of Competition in Public Schooling. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.16563/j.cnki.1671-6272.2013.03.003 MIT Enterprise Forum México. (2017). Ecosistema de alto impacto. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://www.mitefmexico.org/ Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annulas of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine). Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Monchuk, D. C., & Miranowski, J. A. (2010). The Impacts of Local Innovation and Innovative Spillovers on Employment and Population Growth in the U . S . Midwest. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 40(1), 61–70. Monge, P., Heiss, B. M., & Margolin, D. B. (2008). Communication network evolution in organizational communities. Communication Theory, 18(4), 449–477. Montoya, I., Montoya, L., & Muñoz, G. (2012). Aplicación metafórica de elementos de la sociobiología en la formación comunitaria de la identidad territorial. In L. Montoya & I. Montoya (Eds.), Metáforas biológicas aplicadas a las organizaciones (First, p. 252). Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Montoya, L., Aranda, Y., & Montoya, I. (2012). Aplicación de un modelo coevolutivo a la construcción de redes para el desarrollo rural territorial. In L. Montoya & I. Montoya (Eds.), Metáforas biológicas aplicadas a las organizaciones (FIrst, pp. 253–275). Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey - a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, May-June 1. Moore, J. (1996). The Death of Competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harpe rBusiness. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). (2014). The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar Pub. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279893 Moya-latorre, A. (2019). A Culture-Oriented Approach to System Change in Oppressed Communities. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Muchie, M., Bhaduri, S., Baskaran, A., & Sheikh, F. A. (2017). Informal Sector Innovations Insights from the Global South, (Firts). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Müller, J. (2010). Social Construction of Endogenous Technology in the South. In FAU Conference. Djursland, Denmark. Munck, R., & O’Hearn, D. (Eds.). (1999). Critical development theory: contributions to a new paradigm (First). London: Zen Books. Municipio De Guapi. (2016). Plan de desarrollo territorial 2016 - 2019 “Yo amo a Guapi .” Guapi, Cauca. Murove, M. F. (2014). Ubuntu. Diogenes, 59(3–4), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192113493737 Muscio, A. (2006). From regional innovation systems to local innovation systems: Evidence from Italian industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 14(6), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500496073 Nair, A., Guldiken O, Fainshmidt, S., & Pezeshkan, A. (2015). Innovation in India: a review of past research and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 925e958. Nam, C. W. (1999). The significance of regional technology policy for local innovation netwoks - case studies from Bavaria and North Rhine-Westphalia. Geographia Polonica, 72(1), 63–88. Namba, M. (2006). Accelerating Commercialization of University Output by Translating It into Social Value. In PICMET 2006 (pp. 794–802). Istambul. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2006.296615 Nandy, A. (1987). Traditions, tyrannies and utopias. Essays in the politics of awarenesss. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. National Research Council. (2011). Building community disaster resilience through private–public collaboration. Washington. DC, US. Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation System: A comparative study. (R. Nelson, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba” Building a Foundation for knowledge creation. California Review Management, 40(3), 40–54. Norton, M. G. (2007). Japan’s Eco-towns - Industrial clusters or local innovation systems? International Society for the Systems Sciences - 51st Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, ISSS 2007, 360–376. Nuvolari, A. (2004). Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beh011 ODI. (2012). Making systematic reviews work for international development research (No. 1) (Vol. 44). OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (Third edit). Paris: Statistical Office of the European Communities, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Office of Prime Minister. (2017). Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework Uganda: The Way Forward. Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004 Open Street Maps. (2019). Uganda. Arua district. Retrieved May 12, 2019, from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3501793 Otálora, F., Peña, J., Grisales Bohorquez, C., Briant, M., Moreno, C., Melo, S., & Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2018). Análisis del prototipo Tecnifincando como ejercicio de co-creación para la transición a la agroecología. In N. Gaitán-Albarracín, A. Gutiérrez, E. Lleras, & A. Molina-Soler (Eds.), Memorias del I Encuentro Colombiano de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Social (pp. 113–121). Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Universidad de los Andes. Owen, R., Bessant, J., & Heintz, M. (Eds.). (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Willey Editors. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424 Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society , with society. Science and Public Policy 3, 39, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093 Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27–50). Pansera, M. (2013). Frugality, grassroots and inclusiveness: New challenges for mainstream innovation theories. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 5(6), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2013.820445 Pansera, M. (2018). Frugal or Fair? The Unfulfilled Promises of Frugal Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1148 Pansera, M., & Martinez, F. (2017). Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-09-2016-0165 Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2014). Eco-Innovation at the “Bottom of the Pyramid.” In D. Vazquez-Brust (Ed.), Collaboration for Sustainability and Innovation: A Role for Sustainability Driven by the Global South? (pp. v–vii). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7633-3 Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2018). Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India. Research Policy, 47(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.007 Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2019). Innovation and Development: The Politics at the Bottom of the Pyramid (First). Willey Editors. Pansera, M., Rivas, R., & Narvaez-Mena, H. (2017). Frugalidad e innovación popular: nuevos caminos para la sustentabilidad y la inclusión social en Ecuador. Revista CTS, 12(35), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/430503c Papel picado. (2016). Un libro sobre un barco (Primera). Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Papel picado. Park, S.-C. (2001). Globalization and local innovation system: The implementation of government policies to the formation of science parks in Japan and South Korea. Korea Observer, 31(3), 407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01208708 Parques Nacionales Naturales. (2005). Plan de Manejo - Parque Nacional Natural Gorgona. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Pater, M. (2009). Co-creation’s 5 guiding principles. Fronteer Strategy. Patton, A. (2016). Is Uganda the best place to be a refugee? Retrieved June 2, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/aug/20/is-uganda-the-best-place-to-be-a-refugee Pérez Molano, H., León, F., Marmolejo, L., Rodriguez, J., Grisales, C., Ruecker, S., & Fajardo, F. (2018). Desing for reconciliation: co-designing a peaceful future in post-conflict zones in Colombia. Diseña, 13, 140–173. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.13.140-173 Pérez Rave, J. I. (2012). Revisión Sistemática de Literatura en Ingeniería. Medellin: Universidad de Antioquia. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062013000300001 Pérez Rave, J. I. (2013). Revisión sistemática de literatura en Ingeniería como apoyo a la consultoría basada en investigación. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología, 17(66), 38–48. Pitta, D., Pitta, D. A., Guesalaga, R., & Marshall, P. (2008). The quest for the fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Potential and challenges. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760810915608 PNUD. (1987a). Tecnologías en la erradicación de la pobreza Tomo I (Primera). Bogotá: PNUD. PNUD. (1987b). Tecnologías en la erradicación de la pobreza Tomo II (Primera). Bogotá: PNUD. PNUD. (1987c). Tecnologías en la erradicación de la pobreza Tomo III (Primera). Bogotá: PNUD. Poole, D. L., Ferguson, M., DiNitto, D., & Schwab, A. J. (2002). The capacity of community-based organizations to lead local innovations in welfare reform: Early findings from texas. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.12304 Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of the nations. Harvard Business Review, 68, 73–93. Prabhu, G., & Gupta, S. (2014). Heuristics of frugal service innovations. In Management of Engineering & Technology 2014 Portland International Conference on, IEEE (pp. 3309–3312). Prahalad, C. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x Prahalad, C., & Mashelkar, R. (2010). Innovation’s holy grail. Harvard Business Review, 88(7), 132–141. Prats, L., Guia, J., & Molina, F.-X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: The notion of Tourism Local Innovation System. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.24 Presidencia de la República, & FARC-EP. (2016). Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Priestley, M., & Higham, J. (2000). Local Innovation or Government Initiative? Curriculum Specialisation in New Zealand’s Education Quasi– Market. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 35(1), 1–33. PROLINNOVA. (2009). Local Innovation and Participatory Innovation Development: some frequently asked questions (No. 30). Qiu, R., & Cantwell, J. (2018). General Purpose Technologies and local knowledge accumulation — A study on MNC subunits and local innovation centers. International Business Review, 27(4), 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.006 Quintella, R. H., da Silva Monteiro de Freitas, E. J., Ventura, A. C., Santos, M. A., de Melo, D. R. A., da Silva Motta, G., & Jucá, S. (2012). Scientific knowledge networks in peripheral regions and local innovation systems: The case of chemistry in the state of Bahia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 85–103. r0g Agency. (2016a). Open Hardware Guide. Juba, South Sudan: Kapital Movie, Icebauhaus, r0g Agency. r0g Agency. (2016b). Open Learning Guide. Juba, South Sudan: Kapital Movie, Icebauhaus, r0g Agency. r0g Agency. (2018). Access to Skills and Knowledge open tech emergency kit. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from https://openculture.agency/outcomes/askotec/ Raasch, C., & von Hippel, E. (2013). Innovation Process Benefits: The Journey as Reward. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(1), 33–39. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, Be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth (First). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ramalingam, B., Rush, H., Bessant, J., Marshall, N., Gray, B., Hoffman, K., … Warren, K. (2015). Strengthening the Humanitarian Innovation Ecosystem. Brighton. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.06.019 Ramalingam, B., Scriven, K., & Foley, C. (2009). Innovations in international humanitarian action. In LNAP Review of Humanitarian Action (8th ed., pp. 1–88). ANLAP. Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm (First). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Ramírez, M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review. Comunicar, 26(54), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-01 Rantisi, N. M. (2002). The Local Innovation System as a Source of “Variety”: Openness and Adaptability in New York City’s Garment District. Regional Studies, 36(6), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220146740 Rao, B. C. (2013). Technology in Society How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society, 35(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003 Ray, P. K., & Rahman, S. (2006). The propensity for local innovation and interfirm linkages in transnational corporations versus local enterprises in India. Transnational Corporations, 15(2), 71–98. Red Nacional de Información. (2019). Hechos victimizantes Guapi. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Rede de Tecnologia Social. (2011). Social Technology definition. Retrieved February 9, 2019, from www.rts.org.br/english/social-technology Refugee Law Project. (2006). Critique of the refugee act (2006) (Refugee Law Project). Kampala. Reichman, J. (2005). Using liability rules to stimulate local innovation in developing countries: Application to traditional knowledge. In International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime (pp. 337–366). Durham, United States: Duke University School of Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494529.019 Reij, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (2001). Farmer Innovation in Africa: A source of Inspiration for Agricultural Development. (First). London: Earthscan. Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2017). Ciencia y tecnología: soberanía y prácticas del procomún. In De la ciencia abierta a la ciencia común: por otro desarrollo. (p. 6). Rio de Janeiro: Universidad Federal de Río de Janeiro. Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2019a). Communal innovation: collective creation towards wellbeing (New Directions In Innovation Research No. 2). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2019b). Ingeniería, innovación y construcción de paz: caso en el pacífico colombiano. In Anales do I Encontro Latino-americano de engenharia e sociedade (p. 11). Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidade do Sao Paulo. Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2019c). Revisión y emergencia de la innovación comunal: Hacia la transformación socio-técnica desde las comunidades. In Anales do I Encontro Latino-americano de engenharia e sociedade (p. 14). Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidade do Sao Paulo. Reina-Rozo, J. D., & Diaz, H. (2015). Extensión solidaria en la facultad de ingeniería de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Una revisión desde el enfoque de integración interactiva. In XIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Extensión Universitaria (pp. 1–11). La Habana.: Ministerio de Educacion Superior de Cuba. Reina-Rozo, J. D., Diaz, H., Gaitán, N., & Peña, I. (2015). Ingenio y sociedad: hacia una educación de ingeniería humanitaria en colombia. In Encuentro Internacional de Educación en Ingeniería ACOFI 2015 (p. 11). Cartagena de Indias. Reina-Rozo, J. D., Gaitán-Albarracín, N., & Acero, A. (2018a). Acceso abierto para una ingeniería transformadora en Latinoamérica. In N. Gaitán-Albarracín, A. Gutiérrez, E. Lleras, & A. Molina-Soler (Eds.), Memorias del I Encuentro Colombiano de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Social (pp. 29–31). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Universidad de los Andes. Reina-Rozo, J. D., Gaitán-Albarracín, N., & Acero, A. (2018b). Re-ensamblando los vínculos de la ingeniería y la sociedad. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 6(1), 1–6. Reina-Rozo, J. D., & Ortiz, J. (2019). Local Innovation Ecosystems to Strengthen Agroecology in Colombia: The Preliminary Case of LabCampesino of Tierra Libre. Social Innovations Journal, 53, 1–9. Reina-Rozo, J. D., & Peña, I. (2015). Inventiveness and Society, an experience from the Problem Based-Learning approach for a post-conflict scenario in Colombia (South America). In International Joint Conference of Learner in Engineering Education (pp. 1–13). San sebastian. Reina-Rozo, J. D., & Peña, I. (2016). Researching the co-creation : Co-production of knowledge in local innovation. In 4S Science and technology by other means. (p. 10). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Reina-Rozo, J. D., & Peña, I. (2017). Hacia la democratización de la innovación local. In 1st Global Assembly for Knowledge Democracy. Cartagena de Indias: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Reina-Rozo, J. D., Pena Reyes, J. I., & Gaitan-Albarracin, N. (2018). Ingenuity and Society : A humanitarian engineering education experience in Colombia. In Https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8629634/ (Ed.), 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (pp. 1–7). Albuquerque, NM.: IEEE. Reina-Rozo, J. D., Thompson, M., & Leal, D. (2018). Co-design spaces for peace-building in Colombia: A preliminary conceptualization. In 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (pp. 1–9). Albuquerque, NM.: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/weef-gedc.2018.8629673 Reina-Rozo, J., & Gaitán-Albarracín, N. (2017). Ingenio, ciencia, tecnología y sociedad: experiencia desde el aprendizaje basado en problemas. In M. B. Albornoz, J. Jímenez, & J. Rojas (Eds.), Ingeniería, innovación y tecnología social (First, p. 308). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - FLACSO. Reina-Rozo, J., & León, L. (2017). Ingeniería Humanitaria desde/ para el sur global. In M. B. Albornoz, J. Jímenez, & J. Rojas (Eds.), Ingeniería, innovación y tecnología social (p. 308). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia - FLACSO. Riapukhina, V., Glagolev, N., Suprun, V., & Taburchak, P. (2014). Practical aspects of the strategy implementation for regional and local innovation systems development. Istrazivanja i Projektovanja Za Privredu, 12(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes12-7170 Rishikesha, K. (2010). From Jugaad to Systematic Innovation – The challenge for India. India: Vikalpa. Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60–61(February), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004 Rodríguez-Camargo, C., & Ochoa-Duarte, A. (2018). Caracterización de la Paz en Colombia como escenario de construcción de nuevas pedagogías en ciencia y tecnología. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 6(1), 75–98. Rodríguez-Peláez, J., López-Rodriguez, A., Sierra-Correa, P., Hernandez-Ortiz, M., Almario, G., Prieto, L., … Martinez, H. (2009). Ordenamiento ambiental de los manglares del municipio de Guapi, Departamento del Cauca (Pacífico Colombiano) (Serie de d). Santa Marta, Colombia: Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - Invemar. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (p. 69–97.). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Rosenberg, T. (2018). A New Deal for Refugees. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/opinion/refugee-camps-integration.html Ruiz, C., & Parra, C. (Eds.). (2013). Social Innovation: New forms of organization in knowledge-based societies. (First). New York: Rortledge. Russell, M. G., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(January 2016), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024 Sandvik, K. B. (2017). Now is the time to deliver: looking for humanitarian innovation’s theory of change. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-017-0023-2 Sanginga, P., Waters-Bayer, A., Kaaria, S., Njuki, J., & Wettasinha, C. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods. 2008: Earthscan. Santos de Souza, B. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Development and Change (Vol. 44). https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12026 Sardar, Z. (1996). Beyond development: An Islamic perspective. European Journal of Development Research, 8(2), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819608426664 Sardar, Z. (1999). Development and the locations of eurocentrism. In Critical development theory: contributions to a new paradigm (First, pp. 44–62). New York: Zen Books. Sawatani, Y., Nakamura, F., Sakakibara, A., & Sakakibara, A. (2007). Innovation Patterns. In Services Computing, 2007. SCC 2007. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 427–434). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2007.71 Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(September 2017), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023 Schot, J., Boni, A., Ramirez, M., & Steward, F. (2018). Addressing SDGs through Transformative Innovation Policy (TIPC Research Briefing). Schot, J., Daniels, C., Torrens, J., Bloomfield, G., Schot, J., Bloomfield, G., … Torrens, J. (2017). Developing a Shared Understanding of Transformative Innovation Policy. Transformative Innovation Policy Consortium Research Briefs, 2017-01, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28037.86246 Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 Schumacher, E. (2011). Lo pequeño es hermono. Madrid: AKAL. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press. Scriven, K. (2016). Humanitarian innovation. Humanitarian Practice Network, (66), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.03.014 Serra, A. (2010). Citilabs, Qué pueden ser los laboratorios ciudadanos. La Factoria, 45–46. Serra, A. (2013). Tres problemas sobre los laboratorios ciudadanos . Una mirada desde Europa. Revista CTS, 23(8), 283–298. Seyfang, G. (2010). Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7624–7633. Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400. Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2016). What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603 Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots Innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 4016(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121 Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030 Shearmur, R. (2012). Not Being There: Why Local Innovation is Not (Always) Related to Local Factors. In K. I. Westeren (Ed.), Foundations of the Knowledge Economy (First, pp. 117–138). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937728.00013 Sheikh, F. A. (2014). Exploring informal sector community innovations and knowledge appropriation : A study of Kashmiri pashmina shawls. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 6(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.940171 Shiva, V. (2005). Earth democracy: justice, sustainability, and peace. Cambridge: South End Press. Shiva, V. (2008). Soil not oil: environmental justice in an age of climate crisis. Cambridge: South End Press. Simula, H., Hossain, M., & Halme, M. (2015). Frugal and reverse innovations - Quo Vadis? Curr. Sci., 109(5), 1567–1572. Singh, S., Sahib, F., Shmarma, G., Sahib, F., & Mahendru, M. (2011). The Jugaad Technology (Indigenous Innovations) (A Case Study of Indian Origin). Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Business Management, 2(4), 1–15. Smith, A., Arond, E., Fressoli, M., Thomas, H., & Abrol, D. (2012). Grassroots innovation for sustainable development : some enduring dilemmas. In Global Research Forum on Sustainable Consumption and Productio (pp. 1–21). Rio de Janeiro. Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Abrol, D., Arond, E., & Ely, A. (2017). Grassroots innovation movements (First). New York: Rortledge. Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025 Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2016). Grassroots Innovation & Innovation Democracy (No. 89). Brighton. Smith, H. (2003). Local innovation assemblages and institutional capacity in local high-tech economic development: the case of Oxfordshire. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084640 Smith, H. L. (2003). Local innovation assemblages and institutional capacity in local high-tech economic development: The case of Oxfordshire. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000084640 Smith, R., & Leith, K. (2014). D-Lab Scale Ups User Researc Framework. Boston, MA. Smorodinskaya, N., Russell, M., Katukov, D., & Still, K. (2017). Innovation Ecosystems vs. Innovation Systems in Terms of Collaboration and Co-creation of Value. In 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | (pp. 5245–5254). Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.636 Sotarauta, M., & Kautonen, M. (2007). Co-evolution of the Finnish National and Local Innovation and Science Arenas: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Multi-level Governance. Regional Studies, 41(February 2015), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701292284 Spielman, D. J. (2005). Systems Perspectives on Developing-Country Agriculture : A Critical Review. ISNAR. Washington. DC. Stenius, L. (2015). The Co-Creation Paradigm : A Critical Review. Copenhagen Business School. STEPS. (2010). Innovation, Sustainability, Development: A new manifesto. Brighton: STEPS Center. Suárez, J., Martín, G., Cepero, L., Blanco, D., Sotolongo, J., Savran, V., … Rivero, J. L. (2014). Local innovation processes in Agroenergy directed at the mitigation and adaptation to climate change in Cuba. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 48(1), 17–20. Summers, H. (2017). Tensions rise as Uganda neighbourly refugee policy starts to feel the strain. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/may/21/uganda-refugee-policy-breaking-point Suryanegara, M., Gde, I Nugraha, D., Adhi, B. A., Lubis, M. F., & Rifki, M Putra, E. (2015). the Local Innovation Perspective: Development of Mobile- Herbal Service for Indonesia’S Mobile Cellular Market. International Journal of Technology, 2, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v6i2.944 Tachiki, D. S., Hamaya, S., & Yukawa, K. (2006). Japan: Local innovation and diversity in e-Commerce. Global E-commerce: Impacts of National Environment and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488603.006 Taha, K. (2011). Creative Capacity Building in Post-Conflict Uganda. Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Tang, T., Wu, Z., Karhu, K., Hämäläinen, M., & Ji, Y. (2012). Internationally distributed living labs and digital ecosystems for fostering local innovations in everyday life. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 4(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.4.1.106-115 The Sussex Group. (1969). The Sussex Manifesto. Thompson, V., Decker, B., Hardash, J. A.-C., & Summers, R. O. (2012). NASA (In) novation Ecosystem: Taking Technology Innovation from Buzz to Reality. In 2012 Ieee Aerospace Conference. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(Special issue), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum036 Thomson, A. M., Perry, J., & Miller, T. (2015). Linking Collaboration Processes and Outcomes Foundations for Advancing Empirical Theory. In Li. Blomgren & R. O’Learly (Eds.), Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315706146 Titeca, K., & Schiltz, J. (2017). Is Uganda really a “refugee paradise”? Retrieved June 2, 2019, from https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/07/uganda-refugee-paradise-170726133024156.html Todos Somos Pazcífico. (2015). Evaluación social: Agua y saneamiento básico en el Pacifico Sur - Guapi - Tumaco. Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Triomphe, B., Floquet, A., Letty, B., Kamau, G., Almekinders, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (2017). How can external interventions build on local innovations?: Lessons from an assessment of innovation experiences in African smallholder agriculture. In I. Oborn, B. Vanlauwe, M. Phillips, R. Thomas, W. Brooijmans, & K. Atta-Krah (Eds.), Sustainable Intensification in Smallholder Agriculture: An Integrated Systems Research Approach (pp. 334–349). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618791 Triomphe, B., Floquet, A., Letty, B., Kamau, G., Almekinders, C., & Waters-Bayer, A. (2017). How can external interventions build on local innovations?: Lessons from an assessment of innovation experiences in African smallholder agriculture. In Sustainable Intensification in Smallholder Agriculture: An Integrated Systems Research Approach (First, pp. 334–366). Routledge: Routledge. Tsuji, M., & Miyahara, S. (2011). Agglomeration and Local Innovation Networks in Japanese SMEs: Analysis of the Information Linkage. In Industrial Clusters, Upgrading and Innovation in East Asia (pp. 173–202). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857935137.00018 Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(June 2017), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032 Tuckner, V. (1999). The myth of development. In Critical development theory: contributions to a new paradigm (pp. 1–27). New York: Zen Books. Turkina, E., & Van Assche, A. (2018). Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6), 706–728. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0153-9 Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Area Specific Profiles Arua District. Report on National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles. Kampala. Ugandan Parliament. (2006). Refugee act. Kampala: Ugandan Parliament. UNDP. (2017). Innovation for development in Uganda. Retrieved June 2, 2019, from https://medium.com/@UNDP/innovation-for-development-in-uganda-413f88548a3b UNHCR. (2017a). Map Rhino Camp Refugee settlement in Arua Distrct Masterplan. UNHCR. UNHCR. (2017b). Refugee Emergency Telecommunications Sector (RETS). Kampala. UNHCR. (2018a). Multi-Sector Needs Assessment: Rhino Camp Settlement. Kampala. UNHCR. (2018b). South Sudan Regional Refugee Response Plan. UNHCR. (2018c). Uganda Refugee Response Monitoring Settlement Fact Sheet: Rhino Camp | January 2018. Uganda Refugee Response Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICEP.2018.8374296 UNHCR. (2019a). Operational Portal - Uganda Refugee situation. Kampala. UNHCR. (2019b). State of refugee crisis. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html UNHCR. (2019c). Uganda - Refugee Statistics April 2019 - Rhino. Kampala. UNICEF. (2012). UNICEF Innovation Labs. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from https://blogs.unicef.org/innovation/innovation-labs/ Utz, A., & Dahlman, C. (2007). Promoting Inclusive Innovation. In M. A. Dutz (Ed.), Unleashing India’s Innovation: Toward Sustainable and Inclusive Growth (pp. 105–129). Washington, DC: World Bank. Van de Ven, A., Polley, D., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press. Van Mele, P. (2006). Zooming-in zooming-out: a novel method to scale up local innovations and sustainable technologies. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 4(November), 131–142. Vesilind, A. (2010). Engineering Peace and Justice (First). London: Springer books. Viljamaa, K. (2007). Technological and Cultural Challenges in Local Innovation Support Activities—Emerging Knowledge Interactions in Charlotte’s Motor Sport Cluster. European Planning Studies, 15(9), 1215–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701529169 Von Hippel, E. (1976). The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy, 5, 212–239. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00192_2.x Von Hippel, E. (2017). Free Innovation (First). Cambridge: MIT Press. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In R. Owen & J. Bessan (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of Science and Innovation in society WlleyEditors: (p. 78). London: Willey Editors. https://doi.org/10.2777/46253 Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L., Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., Prahalad, C. K., … Rahman, Z. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co- Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015 Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 Wabgou, M. ., Kabunda, M., & Tshibambe, N. (2018). Estado moderno, integración regional y desarrollo en África. Propuestas para una nueva agenda política y económica (Primera). Bogotá D.C. - Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Walravens, N. (2016). Operationalising the concept of the smart city as a local innovation platform: The city of things lab in Antwerp, Belgium. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (pp. 128–136). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39595-1_13 Walsh, J. P., Kress, J. C., & Beyerchen, K. (2015). Book Review Essay: Promises and Perils at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1525/mua.1991.15.1.19 Wang, J. (2010). Framework for University-Industry Cooperation Innovation Ecosystem: Factors and Countermeasure. In 2010 International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering (pp. 303–306). https://doi.org/10.1109/CESCE.2010.153 Wang Tai Peng. (1994). The origins of chinese Kongsi. Selangor: Pelanduk. Waters-Bayer, A., & Bayer, W. (2009). Enhancing Local Innovation to Improve Water Productivity in Crop-Livestock Systems. The Rangeland Journal, 31, 231–235. Waters-Bayer, A., Van Veldhuizen, L., Wongtschowsk, M., & Wettasinha, C. (2012). Recognizing and enhancing processes of local innovation. In Innovation Africa: Enriching Farmers Livelihoods (pp. 239–254). Waters-Bayer, A., van Veldhuizen, L., Wongtschowski, M., & Wettsinha, C. (2009). Recognizing and Enhancing Processes of Local Innovation. In P. Sanginga, A. Waters-Bayer, S. Kaaria, J. Njuki, & C. Wettasinha (Eds.), Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods (First, pp. 239–254). London: Earthscan. Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (Vol. 10). Simon and Schuster. Weiss, S. (1993). Analysis of complex negotiations in international business: the RBC perspective. Organization Science, 4(2), 269–300. West nile web. (2019). The Region. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.westnileweb.com/the-region West Nile Web. (2019). Arua district. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.westnileweb.com/districts/arua-district Wettasinha, C., Wongtschowski, M., & Waters-bayer, A. (2008). Introduction: a global initiative to promote local innovation. In Recognising local innovation: experiences of PROLINNOVA partners (pp. 1–8). Wettasinha C, Wongtschowski, M., & Waters-Bayer, A. (2008). Recognising local innovation: experiences of PROLINNOVA partners. (First). Leusden: PROLINNOVA Secretariat, ETC EcoCulture. Wikipedia. (2019a). Colombia. Municipio de Guapi. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/703167929 Wikipedia. (2019b). Republic of Uganda. Retrieved April 18, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda Wikipedia. (2019c). República de Colombia. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombia Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21 Wong, P. (2016). Responsible innovation for decent nonliberal peoples : a dilemma ? Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709 Wood, D., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of Collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162. World bank. (2015). Innovation Policy A Guide for Developing Countries. European Commission. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8269-1 Wulf, W. (1993). The Collaboratory opportunity. Science, 261, 854–855. Wulf, W. (2007). Changes in Innovation Ecology. Science, 316(5829), 1253. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145598 Wulf, W. (2008). The Innovation Ecology. In G. Schweitzer & Y. Sobouti (Eds.), Science as a Gateway to Understanding: International Workshop Proceedings, Tehran, Iran. (First, pp. 15–23). Washington. DC.: National Academies Press. Yang, C. H., Wu, Y. Y., & Lin, H. L. (2010). Outward Investment To China And Local Innovation Of Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms. Japanese Economic Review, 61(4), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00498.x Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (Third). London: SAGE.ORIGINAL1020744477.2019.pdf1020744477.2019.pdfapplication/pdf6404372https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/1/1020744477.2019.pdf65d525a4de15219522a55c0f6caf8788MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83991https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/2/license.txt6f3f13b02594d02ad110b3ad534cd5dfMD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81025https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/3/license_rdf84a900c9dd4b2a10095a94649e1ce116MD53THUMBNAIL1020744477.2019.pdf.jpg1020744477.2019.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5388https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/75535/4/1020744477.2019.pdf.jpg523a8de53ca03e6644f07369c6ac2bcdMD54unal/75535oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/755352024-03-05 23:07:42.874Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |