Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas

ilustraciones, fotografías, graficas

Autores:: Villamizar Portilla, Laura Natalia

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Repositorio:: Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	UNACIONAL2_195fa9a9d1a8d4da3cfb2dfb66718f76
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/81274
network_acronym_str	UNACIONAL2
network_name_str	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Prototypes and toolkits: design research tools to enhance social participation of children with Intellectual disabilities
title	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
spellingShingle	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas 700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativas Niños con Discapacidad Disabled Children Diseño participativo Prototipos Infancia con discapacidad Toolkits Participatory design Prototypes Children with disabilities Toolkits Integración social Diseño de proyecto
title_short	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
title_full	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
title_fullStr	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
title_full_unstemmed	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
title_sort	Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Villamizar Portilla, Laura Natalia
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Sarmiento Pelayo, Martha Patricia
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Villamizar Portilla, Laura Natalia
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv	700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativas
topic	700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativas Niños con Discapacidad Disabled Children Diseño participativo Prototipos Infancia con discapacidad Toolkits Participatory design Prototypes Children with disabilities Toolkits Integración social Diseño de proyecto
dc.subject.other.spa.fl_str_mv	Niños con Discapacidad
dc.subject.other.eng.fl_str_mv	Disabled Children
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Diseño participativo Prototipos Infancia con discapacidad Toolkits
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	Participatory design Prototypes Children with disabilities Toolkits
dc.subject.unesco.spa.fl_str_mv	Integración social Diseño de proyecto
description	ilustraciones, fotografías, graficas
publishDate	2021
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-17T17:54:24Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-17T17:54:24Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81274
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
url	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81274 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Baxter, P., Susan Jack, & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report Volume, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434600802010058 Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2017). Fair by design. Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3162–S3170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352822 Binder, T., Brandt, E., & Gregory, J. (2008). Design participation(-s). CoDesign, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880801905807 Boer, L., & Donovan, J. (2012). Provotypes for participatory innovation. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12, June 2012, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014 Bohórquez Reyes, J. C., Guido, S., Rodriguez de Salazar, N., Pinilla, M., Gonzalez, M., Yony, G., Macias, H., Rivera, J., Gutierrez, M., & Toro, I. (2004). Tecnologías de apoyo para la comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. https://docplayer.es/16164474-Tecnologias-de-apoyo-para-la-comunicacion-aumentativa-y-alternativa.html Bolin, A. (2018). Organizing for agency: rethinking the conditions for children’s participation in service provision. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1564515 Bredies, K. (2016). Design/Research (Gesche Joo). Christiansson, J., Grönvall, E., & Yndigegn, S. L. (2018). Teaching participatory design using live projects. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210597 Correa Montoya, L., & Castro Martinez, M. C. (2016). Discapacidad e Inclusión Social en Colombia: Informe Alternativo de la Fundación Saldarriaga Concha al Comité CDPD. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659 Druin, A. (2015). Cooperative Inquiry. The A-Z of Social Research, 14(99), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986281.n51 Fernández Moreno, A. (2017). Luchas por el Reconocimiento y las discapacidades en Colombia. Onteaiken: Boletín Sobre Prácticas y Estudis de Acción Colectiva, 23, 70–82. Fisher, S. R. (2014). A Review of “Children, Citizenship, and Environment: Nurturing a Democratic Imagination in a Changing World.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(4), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.928251 Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E., & Claims. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235 Green, M. (2014). Transformational design literacies: children as active place-makers. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 189–204. Hart, R. (1993). La Participación de los niños: de la participación simbólica a la participación auténtica (p. 10). Hemmings, T., & Crabtree, A. (n.d.). Ethnography for Design ? Knutz, E., Markussen, T., & Thomsen, S. M. (2019). Materiality in probes: three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy. CoDesign, 15(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759 Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2012a). Constructive Design Research. Design Research Through Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385502-2.00001-8 Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2012c). How to Work with Theory. Design Research Through Practice, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385502-2.00007-9 Kronqvist, J., Leinonen, T., & Erving, H. (2013). Cardboard Hospital - Prototyping patient-ventric environment and services. Nordic Design Research Conference, 293–301. Kumar, V. (2013). 101 Design Methods. A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Latour, B. (2015). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. (ACLS Humanities E-Book.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613 Lundy, L. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033 Madden, D., Cadet-James, Y., Atkinson, I., & Watkin Lui, F. (2014). Probes and prototypes: A participatory action research approach to codesign. In CoDesign (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 31–45). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.881884 Mattelmäki, T. (2008). Probing for co-exploring. CoDesign, 4(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875027 Meroni, A., & Fassi, D. (2013). Design for social innovation as a form of designing activism. An action format. Nesta, November, 1–15. Müller, F. (2020). Design Ethnography Epistemology and Methodology Translated by Anna Brailovsky (Issue December). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60396-0 Murillo, J., & Hernández, R. (2011). F . Javier Murillo Torrecilla y Reyes Hernández Castilla. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 9(4), 7–23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/551/55122156002.pdf Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of justice. Parsons, S., & Cobb, S. (2014). Reflections on the role of the “users”: Challenges in a multi-disciplinary context of learner-centred design for children on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.890584 Parsons, S., Millen, L., Garib-Penna, S., & Cobb, S. (2011). Participatory design in the development of innovative technologies for children and young people on the autism spectrum: The COSPATIAL project. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.5042/jat.2011.0099 Phillips, L. (2011). Possibilities and Quandaries for Young Children’s Active Citizenship. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.597375 Pierre Johnson, M., Ballie, J., Thorup, T., & Brooks, E. (2017). Living on the Edge: design artefacts as boundary objects. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S219–S235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352771 Poggenpohl, S. H. (2005). Design moves: approximating a desired future with users. In Jorge Frascara (Ed.), Design and the social sciences: making connections (pp. 66–83). Taylor & Francis. Prellwitz, M., & Skär, L. (2006). How children with restricted mobility perceive the accessibility and usability of their home environment. Occupational Therapy International, 13(4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.216 Press, M. (2016). The resourceful social expert: defining the future craft of design research. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives. Ripat, J., & Becker, P. (2012). Playground Usability: What Do Playground Users Say? Occupational Therapy International, 19(3), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1331 Rivera, J., & MacTavish, T. (2017). Research through provocation: a structured prototyping tool using interaction attributes of time, space and information. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3996–S4008. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352902 Ruecker, S. (2015). A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities. Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(2), 1–12. Salamanca, J. (2013). Modeling socially apt smart artifacts. 122. Sanders, E. B. N. (2016). Where are we going? an inspirational map. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. In CoDesign (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 5–14). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183 Sarmiento-pelayo, M. P. (2015). Co-design : A central approach to the inclusion of people with disabilities. 63, 149–154. Sarmiento-Pelayo, M. P., & Fernández-Moreno, A. (2020). Justicia social y diseño. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 30(2), 11–24. Schon, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Ashgate Publishing. Simon, H. A. (1968). The sciences of the artificial (Karl Taylo). Cambridge, M.I.T. Press. Suchman, L. A. (1989). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Contemporary Sociology, 18(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073874 Tironi, M. (2018). Speculative prototyping, frictions and counter-participation: A civic intervention with homeless individuals. Design Studies, 59(July), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.003 Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Design for Transitions ‒ from and to what? . Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686 Tonkinwise, C. (2016). Everyday homeopathy in practice- Changing desig research. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives. Vélez-Latorre, L., & Manjarrés-Carrizalez, D. (2020). The education of subjects with disabilities in Colombia: Historical, theoretical and research approaches in the global and Latin American context. Revista Colombiana de Educacion, 1(78), 253–298. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num78-9902 Wensveen, S., & Matthews, B. (2014). Prototypes and prototyping in design research. The Routledge Companion to Design Research, November, 262–276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-25 Wensveen, S., & Matthews, B. (2019). Prototypes and prototyping in design research. The Routledge Companion to Design Research, January, 262–276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-25 Wolf, B. (2016). Text / Object. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives (pp. 4–6). Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The Role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction. Artifact, 2(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802276893
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	130 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá - Artes - Maestría en Diseño
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Artes
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
institution	Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/1/1.032.457.173.%202022.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/2/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/3/1.032.457.173.%202022.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	efb56a1b0c36ec02a784c4d925400c6e 8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2 d57b0a0ff075039a24f8ac9cd2119ac0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_	1814089925340954624
spelling	Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Sarmiento Pelayo, Martha Patricia1e64d2a6c3de0ba242e6e0d762bba566Villamizar Portilla, Laura Natalia813bc51095ff796b954ce166031b35d02022-03-17T17:54:24Z2022-03-17T17:54:24Z2021https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81274Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ilustraciones, fotografías, graficasEsta investigación explora, a través de un estudio de caso, cómo el diseño participativo puede ser de valor en la participación social, teniendo en cuenta el uso de herramientas del diseño usadas para develar conocimiento sobre los significados creados en la interacción entre usuarios y artefactos, como una contribución de valor a la investigación en diseño. Este estudio cualitativo explora el papel del prototipado y de los kits de herramientas para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas en la construcción de futuros preferibles. Se espera con esto ofrecer oportunidades para participar de manera más significativa en la sociedad más que como receptores pasivos de las decisiones e intervenciones de los adultos. Este estudio resalta la importancia del diseño en la inclusión social. (Texto tomado de la fuente)This research explores, through a case study, how participatory design can be of value in social participation, considering the use of participatory tools and methodologies to reveal knowledge about the meanings that are created in the interaction user–artifacts as a valuable contribution to design research. The aim of the study was to better gain understanding of children with intellectual disabilities and their contexts and to provide conditions to enable their participation. This qualitative study explores the role of prototypes and toolkits to facilitate participation in the creation of better future imaginaries and empower children with intellectual disabilities to participate in a more meaningful way as active participants in society rather than as the passive recipients of adult decisions and interventions. This research highlights the importance of design in social inclusion.MaestríaMagíster en Diseño130 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá - Artes - Maestría en DiseñoFacultad de ArtesBogotá, ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativasNiños con DiscapacidadDisabled ChildrenDiseño participativoPrototiposInfancia con discapacidadToolkitsParticipatory designPrototypesChildren with disabilitiesToolkitsIntegración socialDiseño de proyectoPrototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivasPrototypes and toolkits: design research tools to enhance social participation of children with Intellectual disabilitiesTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMBaxter, P., Susan Jack, & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report Volume, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434600802010058Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2017). Fair by design. Addressing the paradox of inclusive design approaches. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3162–S3170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352822Binder, T., Brandt, E., & Gregory, J. (2008). Design participation(-s). CoDesign, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880801905807Boer, L., & Donovan, J. (2012). Provotypes for participatory innovation. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12, June 2012, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014Bohórquez Reyes, J. C., Guido, S., Rodriguez de Salazar, N., Pinilla, M., Gonzalez, M., Yony, G., Macias, H., Rivera, J., Gutierrez, M., & Toro, I. (2004). Tecnologías de apoyo para la comunicación aumentativa y alternativa. https://docplayer.es/16164474-Tecnologias-de-apoyo-para-la-comunicacion-aumentativa-y-alternativa.htmlBolin, A. (2018). Organizing for agency: rethinking the conditions for children’s participation in service provision. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1564515Bredies, K. (2016). Design/Research (Gesche Joo).Christiansson, J., Grönvall, E., & Yndigegn, S. L. (2018). Teaching participatory design using live projects. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210597Correa Montoya, L., & Castro Martinez, M. C. (2016). Discapacidad e Inclusión Social en Colombia: Informe Alternativo de la Fundación Saldarriaga Concha al Comité CDPD.Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659Druin, A. (2015). Cooperative Inquiry. The A-Z of Social Research, 14(99), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986281.n51Fernández Moreno, A. (2017). Luchas por el Reconocimiento y las discapacidades en Colombia. Onteaiken: Boletín Sobre Prácticas y Estudis de Acción Colectiva, 23, 70–82.Fisher, S. R. (2014). A Review of “Children, Citizenship, and Environment: Nurturing a Democratic Imagination in a Changing World.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(4), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.928251Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E., & Claims. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Green, M. (2014). Transformational design literacies: children as active place-makers. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 189–204.Hart, R. (1993). La Participación de los niños: de la participación simbólica a la participación auténtica (p. 10).Hemmings, T., & Crabtree, A. (n.d.). Ethnography for Design ?Knutz, E., Markussen, T., & Thomsen, S. M. (2019). Materiality in probes: three perspectives for co-exploring patient democracy. CoDesign, 15(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2012a). Constructive Design Research. Design Research Through Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385502-2.00001-8Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2012c). How to Work with Theory. Design Research Through Practice, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385502-2.00007-9Kronqvist, J., Leinonen, T., & Erving, H. (2013). Cardboard Hospital - Prototyping patient-ventric environment and services. Nordic Design Research Conference, 293–301.Kumar, V. (2013). 101 Design Methods. A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Latour, B. (2015). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. (ACLS Humanities E-Book.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Lee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613Lundy, L. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033Madden, D., Cadet-James, Y., Atkinson, I., & Watkin Lui, F. (2014). Probes and prototypes: A participatory action research approach to codesign. In CoDesign (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 31–45). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.881884Mattelmäki, T. (2008). Probing for co-exploring. CoDesign, 4(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875027Meroni, A., & Fassi, D. (2013). Design for social innovation as a form of designing activism. An action format. Nesta, November, 1–15.Müller, F. (2020). Design Ethnography Epistemology and Methodology Translated by Anna Brailovsky (Issue December). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60396-0Murillo, J., & Hernández, R. (2011). F . Javier Murillo Torrecilla y Reyes Hernández Castilla. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 9(4), 7–23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/551/55122156002.pdfNussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of justice.Parsons, S., & Cobb, S. (2014). Reflections on the role of the “users”: Challenges in a multi-disciplinary context of learner-centred design for children on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.890584Parsons, S., Millen, L., Garib-Penna, S., & Cobb, S. (2011). Participatory design in the development of innovative technologies for children and young people on the autism spectrum: The COSPATIAL project. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.5042/jat.2011.0099Phillips, L. (2011). Possibilities and Quandaries for Young Children’s Active Citizenship. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.597375Pierre Johnson, M., Ballie, J., Thorup, T., & Brooks, E. (2017). Living on the Edge: design artefacts as boundary objects. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S219–S235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352771Poggenpohl, S. H. (2005). Design moves: approximating a desired future with users. In Jorge Frascara (Ed.), Design and the social sciences: making connections (pp. 66–83). Taylor & Francis.Prellwitz, M., & Skär, L. (2006). How children with restricted mobility perceive the accessibility and usability of their home environment. Occupational Therapy International, 13(4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.216Press, M. (2016). The resourceful social expert: defining the future craft of design research. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives.Ripat, J., & Becker, P. (2012). Playground Usability: What Do Playground Users Say? Occupational Therapy International, 19(3), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1331Rivera, J., & MacTavish, T. (2017). Research through provocation: a structured prototyping tool using interaction attributes of time, space and information. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3996–S4008. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352902Ruecker, S. (2015). A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities. Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(2), 1–12.Salamanca, J. (2013). Modeling socially apt smart artifacts. 122.Sanders, E. B. N. (2016). Where are we going? an inspirational map. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives.Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. In CoDesign (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 5–14). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183Sarmiento-pelayo, M. P. (2015). Co-design : A central approach to the inclusion of people with disabilities. 63, 149–154.Sarmiento-Pelayo, M. P., & Fernández-Moreno, A. (2020). Justicia social y diseño. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 30(2), 11–24.Schon, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Ashgate Publishing.Simon, H. A. (1968). The sciences of the artificial (Karl Taylo). Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.Suchman, L. A. (1989). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Contemporary Sociology, 18(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073874Tironi, M. (2018). Speculative prototyping, frictions and counter-participation: A civic intervention with homeless individuals. Design Studies, 59(July), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.003Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Design for Transitions ‒ from and to what? . Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686Tonkinwise, C. (2016). Everyday homeopathy in practice- Changing desig research. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives.Vélez-Latorre, L., & Manjarrés-Carrizalez, D. (2020). The education of subjects with disabilities in Colombia: Historical, theoretical and research approaches in the global and Latin American context. Revista Colombiana de Educacion, 1(78), 253–298. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num78-9902Wensveen, S., & Matthews, B. (2014). Prototypes and prototyping in design research. The Routledge Companion to Design Research, November, 262–276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-25Wensveen, S., & Matthews, B. (2019). Prototypes and prototyping in design research. The Routledge Companion to Design Research, January, 262–276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-25Wolf, B. (2016). Text / Object. In Design As Research : Positions, Arguments, Perspectives (pp. 4–6).Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The Role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction. Artifact, 2(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802276893EstudiantesInvestigadoresORIGINAL1.032.457.173. 2022.pdf1.032.457.173. 2022.pdfTesis de Maestría en Diseñoapplication/pdf3289369https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/1/1.032.457.173.%202022.pdfefb56a1b0c36ec02a784c4d925400c6eMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84074https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/2/license.txt8153f7789df02f0a4c9e079953658ab2MD52THUMBNAIL1.032.457.173. 2022.pdf.jpg1.032.457.173. 2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4821https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/81274/3/1.032.457.173.%202022.pdf.jpgd57b0a0ff075039a24f8ac9cd2119ac0MD53unal/81274oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/812742024-08-04 23:10:28.883Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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

Prototipos y Toolkits: herramientas de la investigación en diseño para facilitar la participación de niños y niñas con discapacidades cognitivas

Publicaciones similares