Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement

Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate...

Full description

Autores:
Simancas-Pallares, Miguel
Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés
Cortés-Reyes, Edgar
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/65280
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/
Palabra clave:
61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health
reproducibility of results
periodontics
digital dental radiography
epidemiology.
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Periodoncia
Radiografía digital dental
Epidemiología
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
id UNACIONAL2_08ecb131e075a841ca9c545c235659e0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/65280
network_acronym_str UNACIONAL2
network_name_str Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
title Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
spellingShingle Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health
reproducibility of results
periodontics
digital dental radiography
epidemiology.
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Periodoncia
Radiografía digital dental
Epidemiología
title_short Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
title_full Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
title_fullStr Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
title_sort Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Simancas-Pallares, Miguel
Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés
Cortés-Reyes, Edgar
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Simancas-Pallares, Miguel
Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés
Cortés-Reyes, Edgar
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv 61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health
topic 61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health
reproducibility of results
periodontics
digital dental radiography
epidemiology.
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Periodoncia
Radiografía digital dental
Epidemiología
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv reproducibility of results
periodontics
digital dental radiography
epidemiology.
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Periodoncia
Radiografía digital dental
Epidemiología
description Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography in bone height measurement in patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods. a consistency diagnostic test study was performed. 136 patients with chronic periodontitis were included, selecting the worst prognosis teeth and two radiographs -conventional and digital- were taken for each one. Two experienced and blinded examiners performed radiographic measurements. Reproducibility was obtained through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient by using the statistical package STATA™ for Windows.Results. Average age was 38.8 (SD: 9.9) and 61.6 % were female patients. 125 pairs of matched radiographs for 1000 measurements were evaluated. Overall reproducibility between the methods for mesial and distal measurements were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.70) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71) respectively.Conclusions. Reproducibility between methods was considered poor, including subgroup analysis, therefore, reproducibility between methods is minimal. Usage of these methods in periodontics should be made implementing the whole knowledge of the technical features and the advantages of these systems.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-07-03T00:06:11Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-07-03T00:06:11Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv ISSN: 2357-3848
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280
dc.identifier.eprints.spa.fl_str_mv http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 2357-3848
url https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/53224
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Simancas-Pallares, Miguel and Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés and Cortés-Reyes, Edgar (2015) Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 63 (4). pp. 625-631. ISSN 2357-3848
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Medicina
institution Universidad Nacional de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/1/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/2/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 015216cf07711c7f6c8c4391c29ce4b0
77c4217b235ee17262bf08faed845539
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co
_version_ 1814089927409795072
spelling Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Simancas-Pallares, Miguel1a97a5e2-2454-4b95-9a9a-5259c43bf725300Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés02338c1b-f31c-4b71-bcf1-2e44b97ae23d300Cortés-Reyes, Edgar4ba1a59b-0a69-4eee-b375-2782d172a3133002019-07-03T00:06:11Z2019-07-03T00:06:11Z2015-10-01ISSN: 2357-3848https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography in bone height measurement in patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods. a consistency diagnostic test study was performed. 136 patients with chronic periodontitis were included, selecting the worst prognosis teeth and two radiographs -conventional and digital- were taken for each one. Two experienced and blinded examiners performed radiographic measurements. Reproducibility was obtained through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient by using the statistical package STATA™ for Windows.Results. Average age was 38.8 (SD: 9.9) and 61.6 % were female patients. 125 pairs of matched radiographs for 1000 measurements were evaluated. Overall reproducibility between the methods for mesial and distal measurements were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.70) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71) respectively.Conclusions. Reproducibility between methods was considered poor, including subgroup analysis, therefore, reproducibility between methods is minimal. Usage of these methods in periodontics should be made implementing the whole knowledge of the technical features and the advantages of these systems.Antecedentes. Diversas ayudas diagnósticas están disponibles para la medición de la altura ósea; las dos más empleadas en odontología son la radiografía periapical convencional y la digital. A la fecha se cuenta con pocos estudios que den cuenta de la precisión y exactitud al compararlos.Objetivo. Estimar la concordancia entre la radiografía periapical convencional y la digital para la medición de la altura ósea en pacientes con periodontitis crónica.Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de pruebas diagnósticas de consistencia en 136 pacientes con periodontitis crónica seleccionando el diente con peor pronóstico. Se obtuvieron dos radiografías —convencional y digital— para cada diente y dos examinadores cegados realizaron las mediciones radiográficas. La concordancia se obtuvo con el coeficiente de correlación y concordancia de Lin empleando el paquete Stata para Windows.Resultados. La edad promedio fue 38.8 años (DE: 9.9) y 61.6% de los pacientes fueron mujeres. Se evaluaron 125 pares de radiografías para 1000 mediciones en total. La concordancia global fue 0.62 (IC 95%: 0.55-0.70) y 0.64 (IC 95%: 0.57-0.71) para las mediciones mesiales y distales respectivamente.Conclusiones. La concordancia entre los métodos se consideró pobre incluso en el análisis por subgrupos por tanto la reproducibilidad es mínima. El uso de estos métodos en periodoncia debe hacerse empleando el conocimiento completo de las características técnicas y ventajas de estos sistemas.application/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Medicinahttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/53224Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Revista de la Facultad de MedicinaRevista de la Facultad de MedicinaSimancas-Pallares, Miguel and Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés and Cortés-Reyes, Edgar (2015) Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 63 (4). pp. 625-631. ISSN 2357-384861 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and healthreproducibility of resultsperiodonticsdigital dental radiographyepidemiology.Reproducibilidad de resultadosPeriodonciaRadiografía digital dentalEpidemiologíaReproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurementArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTORIGINAL53224-276862-1-PB.pdfapplication/pdf573661https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/1/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf015216cf07711c7f6c8c4391c29ce4b0MD51THUMBNAIL53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg8136https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/2/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg77c4217b235ee17262bf08faed845539MD52unal/65280oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/652802024-05-09 23:09:21.013Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.co