Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement
Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate...
- Autores:
-
Simancas-Pallares, Miguel
Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés
Cortés-Reyes, Edgar
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/65280
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/
- Palabra clave:
- 61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health
reproducibility of results
periodontics
digital dental radiography
epidemiology.
Reproducibilidad de resultados
Periodoncia
Radiografía digital dental
Epidemiología
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
id |
UNACIONAL2_08ecb131e075a841ca9c545c235659e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/65280 |
network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
title |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
spellingShingle |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement 61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health reproducibility of results periodontics digital dental radiography epidemiology. Reproducibilidad de resultados Periodoncia Radiografía digital dental Epidemiología |
title_short |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
title_full |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
title_sort |
Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés Cortés-Reyes, Edgar |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Simancas-Pallares, Miguel Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés Cortés-Reyes, Edgar |
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health |
topic |
61 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and health reproducibility of results periodontics digital dental radiography epidemiology. Reproducibilidad de resultados Periodoncia Radiografía digital dental Epidemiología |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
reproducibility of results periodontics digital dental radiography epidemiology. Reproducibilidad de resultados Periodoncia Radiografía digital dental Epidemiología |
description |
Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography in bone height measurement in patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods. a consistency diagnostic test study was performed. 136 patients with chronic periodontitis were included, selecting the worst prognosis teeth and two radiographs -conventional and digital- were taken for each one. Two experienced and blinded examiners performed radiographic measurements. Reproducibility was obtained through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient by using the statistical package STATA™ for Windows.Results. Average age was 38.8 (SD: 9.9) and 61.6 % were female patients. 125 pairs of matched radiographs for 1000 measurements were evaluated. Overall reproducibility between the methods for mesial and distal measurements were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.70) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71) respectively.Conclusions. Reproducibility between methods was considered poor, including subgroup analysis, therefore, reproducibility between methods is minimal. Usage of these methods in periodontics should be made implementing the whole knowledge of the technical features and the advantages of these systems. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-03T00:06:11Z |
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-03T00:06:11Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 2357-3848 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280 |
dc.identifier.eprints.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/ |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 2357-3848 |
url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280 http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/ |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/53224 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Revista de la Facultad de Medicina |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Simancas-Pallares, Miguel and Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés and Cortés-Reyes, Edgar (2015) Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 63 (4). pp. 625-631. ISSN 2357-3848 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional Derechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Medicina |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/1/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/2/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
015216cf07711c7f6c8c4391c29ce4b0 77c4217b235ee17262bf08faed845539 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814089927409795072 |
spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 InternacionalDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Simancas-Pallares, Miguel1a97a5e2-2454-4b95-9a9a-5259c43bf725300Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés02338c1b-f31c-4b71-bcf1-2e44b97ae23d300Cortés-Reyes, Edgar4ba1a59b-0a69-4eee-b375-2782d172a3133002019-07-03T00:06:11Z2019-07-03T00:06:11Z2015-10-01ISSN: 2357-3848https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/65280http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/66303/Background. Several diagnostic aids are available for bone height measurement. Digital and conventional radiographs are the two ones most used in Dentistry. Few studies accounting for accuracy and precision have been conducted to compare these methods.Objective. The aim of this study was to estimate reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography in bone height measurement in patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods. a consistency diagnostic test study was performed. 136 patients with chronic periodontitis were included, selecting the worst prognosis teeth and two radiographs -conventional and digital- were taken for each one. Two experienced and blinded examiners performed radiographic measurements. Reproducibility was obtained through Lin's concordance correlation coefficient by using the statistical package STATA™ for Windows.Results. Average age was 38.8 (SD: 9.9) and 61.6 % were female patients. 125 pairs of matched radiographs for 1000 measurements were evaluated. Overall reproducibility between the methods for mesial and distal measurements were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.70) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71) respectively.Conclusions. Reproducibility between methods was considered poor, including subgroup analysis, therefore, reproducibility between methods is minimal. Usage of these methods in periodontics should be made implementing the whole knowledge of the technical features and the advantages of these systems.Antecedentes. Diversas ayudas diagnósticas están disponibles para la medición de la altura ósea; las dos más empleadas en odontología son la radiografía periapical convencional y la digital. A la fecha se cuenta con pocos estudios que den cuenta de la precisión y exactitud al compararlos.Objetivo. Estimar la concordancia entre la radiografía periapical convencional y la digital para la medición de la altura ósea en pacientes con periodontitis crónica.Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de pruebas diagnósticas de consistencia en 136 pacientes con periodontitis crónica seleccionando el diente con peor pronóstico. Se obtuvieron dos radiografías —convencional y digital— para cada diente y dos examinadores cegados realizaron las mediciones radiográficas. La concordancia se obtuvo con el coeficiente de correlación y concordancia de Lin empleando el paquete Stata para Windows.Resultados. La edad promedio fue 38.8 años (DE: 9.9) y 61.6% de los pacientes fueron mujeres. Se evaluaron 125 pares de radiografías para 1000 mediciones en total. La concordancia global fue 0.62 (IC 95%: 0.55-0.70) y 0.64 (IC 95%: 0.57-0.71) para las mediciones mesiales y distales respectivamente.Conclusiones. La concordancia entre los métodos se consideró pobre incluso en el análisis por subgrupos por tanto la reproducibilidad es mínima. El uso de estos métodos en periodoncia debe hacerse empleando el conocimiento completo de las características técnicas y ventajas de estos sistemas.application/pdfspaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Medicinahttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/53224Universidad Nacional de Colombia Revistas electrónicas UN Revista de la Facultad de MedicinaRevista de la Facultad de MedicinaSimancas-Pallares, Miguel and Rubio-Romero, Jorge Andrés and Cortés-Reyes, Edgar (2015) Reproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurement. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 63 (4). pp. 625-631. ISSN 2357-384861 Ciencias médicas; Medicina / Medicine and healthreproducibility of resultsperiodonticsdigital dental radiographyepidemiology.Reproducibilidad de resultadosPeriodonciaRadiografía digital dentalEpidemiologíaReproducibility between conventional and digital periapical radiography for bone height measurementArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Texthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTORIGINAL53224-276862-1-PB.pdfapplication/pdf573661https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/1/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf015216cf07711c7f6c8c4391c29ce4b0MD51THUMBNAIL53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg8136https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/65280/2/53224-276862-1-PB.pdf.jpg77c4217b235ee17262bf08faed845539MD52unal/65280oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/652802024-05-09 23:09:21.013Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |