Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera

El reemplazo total de cadera o también llamado artroplastia total de cadera es un procedimiento quirúrgico en el cual se reemplaza los componentes anatómicos que conforman la articulación de la cadera debido a patologías en las cuales se pierde o altera la anatomía normal, causando intenso dolor y a...

Full description

Autores:
Coronado Pantoja, David Alejandro
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
Repositorio:
Repositorio UNAB
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/23231
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/23231
Palabra clave:
Medical sciences
Health sciences
Hips
Replacement
Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis
Patients
Satisfaction
Orthopedics
Surgery
Post surgical
Medical attention
Surgical clinics
Health institutions
Hip prosthesis
Hip replacement arthroplasty
Ciencias médicas
Atención médica
Clínicas quirúrgicas
Instituciones de salud
Prótesis de cadera
Artroplastia de remplazo de cadera
Caderas
Reemplazo
Artroplastia
Artrosis
Pacientes
Satisfacción
Ortopedia
Cirugía
Post quirúrgico
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UNAB2_cb9c239967593959743e66c63217d8f7
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/23231
network_acronym_str UNAB2
network_name_str Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Factors associated with patient satisfaction in the post-operative operation of total hip replacement
title Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
spellingShingle Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
Medical sciences
Health sciences
Hips
Replacement
Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis
Patients
Satisfaction
Orthopedics
Surgery
Post surgical
Medical attention
Surgical clinics
Health institutions
Hip prosthesis
Hip replacement arthroplasty
Ciencias médicas
Atención médica
Clínicas quirúrgicas
Instituciones de salud
Prótesis de cadera
Artroplastia de remplazo de cadera
Caderas
Reemplazo
Artroplastia
Artrosis
Pacientes
Satisfacción
Ortopedia
Cirugía
Post quirúrgico
title_short Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
title_full Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
title_fullStr Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
title_full_unstemmed Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
title_sort Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de cadera
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Coronado Pantoja, David Alejandro
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro
Serrano Gómez, Sergio
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Coronado Pantoja, David Alejandro
dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro [0000130799]
Serrano Gómez, Sergio [0001547816]
dc.contributor.googlescholar.spa.fl_str_mv Serrano Gómez, Sergio [es&oi=ao]
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro [0009-0006-6136-8281]
Serrano Gómez, Sergio [0000-0001-6418-7116]
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias y Educación en Salud
dc.contributor.apolounab.spa.fl_str_mv Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro [omar-alejandro-amado-pico]
Serrano Gómez, Sergio [sergio-eduardo-serrano-gómez]
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Medical sciences
Health sciences
Hips
Replacement
Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis
Patients
Satisfaction
Orthopedics
Surgery
Post surgical
Medical attention
Surgical clinics
Health institutions
Hip prosthesis
Hip replacement arthroplasty
topic Medical sciences
Health sciences
Hips
Replacement
Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis
Patients
Satisfaction
Orthopedics
Surgery
Post surgical
Medical attention
Surgical clinics
Health institutions
Hip prosthesis
Hip replacement arthroplasty
Ciencias médicas
Atención médica
Clínicas quirúrgicas
Instituciones de salud
Prótesis de cadera
Artroplastia de remplazo de cadera
Caderas
Reemplazo
Artroplastia
Artrosis
Pacientes
Satisfacción
Ortopedia
Cirugía
Post quirúrgico
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Ciencias médicas
Atención médica
Clínicas quirúrgicas
Instituciones de salud
Prótesis de cadera
Artroplastia de remplazo de cadera
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Caderas
Reemplazo
Artroplastia
Artrosis
Pacientes
Satisfacción
Ortopedia
Cirugía
Post quirúrgico
description El reemplazo total de cadera o también llamado artroplastia total de cadera es un procedimiento quirúrgico en el cual se reemplaza los componentes anatómicos que conforman la articulación de la cadera debido a patologías en las cuales se pierde o altera la anatomía normal, causando intenso dolor y afectación de la calidad de vida, por elementos metálicos, cerámicas, polímeros entre otros, que intentan restablecer la funcionalidad coxofemoral. Las principales indicaciones causales del reemplazo total de cadera son la osteoartritis (que representó el 90% de los procedimientos en el Reino Unido en 2017), fractura del cuello del fémur (5%), necrosis avascular (2%), displasia (2%) y artritis inflamatoria. (1%). La osteoartritis de cadera tiene causas multifactoriales, con componentes biológicos y mecánicos dictados por factores genéticos y ambientales. En este estudio se pretende conocer cuáles son los factores e intervenciones que mejoran la percepción de los pacientes en el post operatorio, así como la satisfacción y mejoría de calidad de vida posterior al manejo quirúrgico de reemplazo total de cadera en pacientes intervenidos por el grupo de Ortopedia y Traumatología de la Clínica Foscal y Foscal Internacional. 1.2 Metodología Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Análisis secundario de una base de datos anonimizada del servicio de ortopedia en el que se incluyen pacientes con patologías de la articulación coxofemoral a quienes se realizó reemplazo total primario de cadera con prótesis cementada o no cementada en la clínica Foscal y Foscal internacional durante el periodo de junio de 2020 a diciembre de 2022. Se utilizó para el estudio la base de datos anonimizada que se ha venido llevando desde el 2020 donde se tomaron datos sociodemográficos, diagnóstico por el que se llevó a cabo la cirugía, características de la prótesis, medidas antropométricas de los pacientes, complicaciones tempranas y tardías, nivel de satisfacción medido con escalas, la cual fue diligenciada al momento de la cirugía para su posterior análisis estadístico.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-06
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-22T19:15:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-22T19:15:44Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv Thesis
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Tesis
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/23231
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/23231
identifier_str_mv instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB
repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv 1. Reznick E, Embry KR, Neuman R, Bolívar-nieto E, Fey NP, Gregg RD. Lower-limb kinematics and kinetics during continuously varying human locomotion. 2021;1–12.
2. Sacitharan PK. Ageing and osteoarthritis. Vol. 91, Subcellular Biochemistry. 2019. 123–159 p.
3. Bank W. World Population Ageing 2019 [Internet]. World Population Ageing 2019. 2019. 64 p. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5204-7_6
Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury [Internet]. 2018;49(8):1458–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015
5. Coughlin TA, Nightingale JM, Myint Y, Forward DP, Norrish AR, Ollivere BJ. Patient-reported outcomes in young patients with isolated fracture of the hip : MEAN 57 MONTHS’ FOLLOW-UP. Bone Jt J. 2020;102(6):766–71.
6. Славковић Н, Вукашиновић З, Башчаревић З, Вукомановић Б. Тотална алоартропластика кука. 2012;140:379–84.
7. Lyman S, Ms YL, Franklin PD, Li W, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Validation of the HOOS , JR : A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;
8. Lee MC, Eberson CP. Growth and Development of the Child’s Hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;37(2):119–32.
9. DISPLASIA DE LA CADERA EN DESARROLLO - GUÍA CLÍNICA - Gabriel Ochoa Del Portillo - 2020 - Mayo de 2020 (2).pdf.
10. Seeley MA, Georgiadis AG, Sankar WN. Hip Vascularity : A Review of the Abstract. 2016;24(8):515–26.
11. Fernández-tormos E, Dantas P, Marín-pe O, Rego P, Pérez-carro L. Anatomía y función de la articulación coxofemoral . Anatomía artroscópica de la cadera. 2016;3(1):3–10.
12. Rego P, Mascarenhas V, Collado D, Coelho A, Barbosa L, Ganz R. Arterial Topographic Anatomy Near the Femoral Head-Neck Perforation with Surgical Relevance. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2017;99(14):1213–21.
13. Walters BL, Cooper JH, Rodriguez JA. New findings in hip capsular anatomy: Dimensions of capsular thickness and pericapsular contributions. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg [Internet]. 2014;30(10):1235–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.012
14. Dunoyer J. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. 2001;83(January):149–52.
15. Gardner MJ, Sussmann PS. The surgical anatomy of the blood supply to the femoral head DESCRIPTION OF THE ANASTOMOSIS BETWEEN THE MEDIAL FEMORAL CIRCUMFLEX AND INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERIES AT. :1298–303.
16. Sariali E, Klouche S, Mamoudy P. Investigation into three dimensional hip anatomy in anterior dislocation after THA. Influence of the position of the hip rotation centre. Clin Biomech [Internet]. 2012;27(6):562–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.12.014
17. Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C. Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(6):1329–36.
18. Warrener AG. Hominin Hip Biomechanics: Changing Perspectives. Anat Rec. 2017;300(5):932–45.
19. Polkowski GG, Clohisy JC. Hip Biomechanics. 2010;18(2):56–62.
20. Meneses Monroy A, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Ursúa ME, Caparrós N, Ruiz de Ocenda MI, López L, et al. Validation of the living with osteoarthritis in Spanish population. Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2021;53(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102044
21. Lespasio MJ, Sultan AA, Piuzzi NS, Khlopas A, Husni ME, Muschler GF, et al. Hip Osteoarthritis: A Primer. Perm J. 2018;22:89–94.
22. Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, et al. Prevalence of Hip Symptoms and Radiographic and Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians : The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. 2009;809–15.
23. Dc SD, Garbedian S, Wai EK. Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Radiographic Primary Hip Osteoarthritis. 2009;623–37.
24. Bernad-Pineda M, de las Heras-Sotos J, Garcés-Puentes M V. Calidad de vida en pacientes con artrosis de rodilla y/o cadera. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol [Internet]. 2014;58(5):283–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2014.04.005
25. Orthopaedics C. Classifications in Brief. 2016;83:1886–93.
26. Shapira J, Chen JW, Bheem R, Rosinsky PJ, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, et al. Binary Tönnis classification: simplified modification demonstrates better inter- And intra-observer reliability as well as agreement in surgical management of hip pathology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):1–9.
27. Stevens JA, Rudd RA. The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(10):2725–8.
28. Li T, Zhang QS. Is dynamic locking plate superior than other implants for intracapsular hip fracture A meta-analysis. Med (United States). 2018;97(47).
29. Chiron P, Lafontan V, Reina N. Fracture-dislocations of the femoral head. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2013;99(1):S53–66. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.007
30. Tonetti J, Ruatti S, Lafontan V, Loubignac F, Chiron P, Sari-Ali H, et al. Is femoral head fracture-dislocation management improvable: A retrospective study in 110 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(6):623–31.
31. Romeo NM, Firoozabadi R. Classifications in Brief: The Pipkin Classification of Femoral Head Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(5):1114–9.
32. A.V. F, J.R. L, G.J. H, K.J. K. Femoral neck fractures: Current management. J Orthop Trauma [Internet]. 2015;29(3):121–9. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L602056695%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000291
33. Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S. Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(1):S27–32.
34. Schwarz N. Was bleibt von der frakturklassifikation nach pauwels? Eine kritische literaturanalyse. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;148(2):191–7.
35. Van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Genelin F, Meylaerts SAG, Roukema GR. The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2012;98(4):405–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.02.003
36. Moya-angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM, Moya-angeler J, et al. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. 2015;6(8):590–601.
37. Seijas R, Sallent A, Rivera E, Ares O, Seijas R, Sallent A, et al. Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head. J Investig Surg [Internet]. 2017;0(0):1–2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2017.1398282
38. Lieberman JR. Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head : Evaluation and Treatment. 2014;22(7):455–64.
39. Scully SP. In Brief : Ficat Classification : Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head. 2012;2636–9.
40. Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1662–71.
41. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: Updated projections to 2021. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2014;96(8):624–30.
42. Santori N, Falez F, Potestio D, Santori FS. Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement. 2019;55–61.
43. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS. Durability of the Cemented Femoral Stem in Patients. 2004;(419):115–23.
44. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Rasquinha VJ. Mastering the Art of Cemented Femoral Stem Fixation. 2004;19(4):85–91.
45. Morán D, Navarro N, García N, Caballero R. Biomecánica de la prótesis total de cadera cementada y no cementada. 2011;(v).
46. Rodriguez A. Acetabular Fixation Options : Notes from the Other Side. 2006;21(4):93–6.
47. Berend KR, Lombardi A V, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Cementless Double-Tapered Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 75 Years of Age and Older. 2004;19(3):288–95.
48. Yates P, Tr F, Serjeant S, Rushforth G, Middleton R, Tr F. The Relative Cost of Cemented and Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasties. 2006;21(1):102–5.
49. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. 2013;3–8.
50. Howard JL, Lanting BL. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. 2015;58:128–40.
51. Horne PH, Olson SA. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. 2011;139–45.
52. Burnett SJ, Abos D. Total hip arthroplasty: Techniques and results. 2010;(November):455–64.
53. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes ( PROs ). 2013;
54. Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P. Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Hueter Anterior Approach. 2008;23(2):266–72.
55. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical Approach , Abductor Function , and Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation. 2002;(405):46–53.
56. Pellicci PM, Potter HG, Foo LF, Boettner F. MRI Shows Biologic Restoration of Posterior Soft Tissue Repairs after THA. 2009;940–5.
57. Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does Surgical Approach Affect Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Rates ? 2006;(447):34–8.
58. Kiyama T, Naito M. Hip Abductor Strengths After Total Hip Arthroplasty Via the Lateral and Posterolateral Approaches. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2010;25(1):76–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.001
59. Jewett BA, Collis DK. High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table. 2011;503–7.
60. Hendel D, Yasin M, Garti A, Weisbort M, Beloosesky Y. Fracture of the greater trochanter during hip replace- ment. 2002;73(3):295–7.
61. Khan T, Orth F, Orth M. Damage to the Superior Gluteal Nerve During the Direct Lateral Approach to the Hip A Cadaveric Study. 2007;22(8):1198–200.
62. Goulding K, Beaule PE, Kim PR, Ma AF. Incidence of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Neuropraxia After Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty. 2010;2397–404.
63. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of 850 Patients. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2011;26(2):209–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013
64. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: The role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1–9.
65. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017;32(12):3854–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021
66. Lynskey SJ, Ling F, Greenberg AM, Penny-Dimri JC, Sutherland AG. The influence of patient resilience and health status on satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Surgeon [Internet]. 2021;19(1):8–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.007
67. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) - Validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:1–8.
68. Garabano G, Lopreite FA, Mana Pastrian D, Robador N, Del Sel H. Satisfacción del paciente luego de una artroplastia de cadera o rodilla. Rev la Asoc Argentina Ortop y Traumatol. 2012;77(2):112.
69. Strassburger-Weidmann J, Vélez-de Lachica J. Satisfacción del paciente operado de artroplastía primaria de cadera con abordaje anterior, lateral y posterior. Acta Ortopédica Mex. 2019;33(6):395–9.
70. Soh SE, Harris IA, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves SE, et al. Implications for research and clinical use from a Rasch analysis of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments. Osteoarthr Cartil [Internet]. 2021;29(6):824–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.568
71. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2007;89(7):893–900
72. Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement: A five-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2007;89(7):868–73.
73. Anderson JA, Mason JA, Halliday B. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with inherited bleeding disorders: A 20-year single-surgeon cohort. Haemophilia. 2018;24(5):786–91.
74. den Daas A, Reitsma EA, Knobben BAS, Ten Have BLEF, Somford MP. Patient satisfaction in different approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2019;105(7):1277–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.003
75. Conner-Spady BL, Bohm E, Loucks L, Dunbar MJ, Marshall DA, Noseworthy TW. Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2020;29(3):705–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02359-7
76. Ponzio DY, Rothermel SD, Chiu YF, Stavrakis AI, Lyman S, Windsor RE. Does Physical Activity Level Influence Total Hip Arthroplasty Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcomes? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2021;36(8):2850–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.052
77. Van Meirhaeghe JP, Alarkawi D, Kowalik T, Du-Moulin W, Molnar R, Adie S. Predicting dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty using a Bayesian model averaging approach: Results from the Australian Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN). ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(9):1908–13.
78. Nissen T, Douw K, Overgaard S. Patient-reported outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and standard total hip replacement after short-term follow-up. 2011;58(10).
79. Escandón S, Parada C, Gonzalo L, Molano J. Ortopedia y Traumatología y la aparición de eventos adversos perioperatorios. Rev Colomb Ortop y Traumatol [Internet]. 2020;27(4):205–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0120-8845(13)70021-X
80. Tr F, Fick D, Hons M, Haebich S, Phys B, Khan RJK, et al. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Hip Pain , Function , and Satisfaction Ten Years following Total Hip Arthroplasty . J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2019; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.046
81. Shan L, Shan B, Graham D, Saxena A. Total hip replacement : a systematic review and meta-analysis on mid-term quality of life. Osteoarthr Cartil [Internet]. 2014;22(3):389–406. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.006
82. Greimel F, Maderbacher G, Zeman F, Grifka J. No clinical difference comparing general, regional and combination anesthesia in hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort-study regarding perioperative pain management and patient satisfaction. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.038
83. Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Le S, Bonutti PM, Delanois RE, et al. What In fl uences How Patients Rate Their Hospital After Total Hip Arthroplasty ? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2016;1–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.060
84. Schaal T, Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J. Determinants of patient satisfaction and their willingness to return after primary total hip replacement : a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2016;1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1196-3
85. Rolfson O, Donahue GS, Hallsten M, Nemes S. Patient-reported outcomes in cemented and uncemented total hip replacements. 2016;26(5):451–7.
dc.relation.uriapolo.spa.fl_str_mv https://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/omar-alejandro-amado-pico
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.creativecommons.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia)
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv 2020 A 2023
dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv UNAB Campus Bucaramanga
dc.publisher.grantor.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Especialización en Ortopedia y Traumatología
institution Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/1/Tesis.pdf
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/5/Licencia.pdf
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/4/license.txt
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/6/Tesis.pdf.jpg
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/7/Licencia.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0179543c0d99b962dfc945dbea59216d
83798ff13508675576f5b4f0a3330bc7
3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316
d14c57ae130fed96b634793cf873de53
7a0e4b4f65b52fa1f452c3003ae26d00
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_ 1814277318511689728
spelling Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro3e30653a-2495-415d-b3af-326d97284a47Serrano Gómez, Sergio1388c405-654e-49ed-9943-47bcddb26119Coronado Pantoja, David Alejandroe018ea51-f235-401b-9ce8-31f25a71c11fAmado Pico, Omar Alejandro [0000130799]Serrano Gómez, Sergio [0001547816]Serrano Gómez, Sergio [es&oi=ao]Amado Pico, Omar Alejandro [0009-0006-6136-8281]Serrano Gómez, Sergio [0000-0001-6418-7116]Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias y Educación en SaludAmado Pico, Omar Alejandro [omar-alejandro-amado-pico]Serrano Gómez, Sergio [sergio-eduardo-serrano-gómez]Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia)2020 A 2023UNAB Campus Bucaramanga2024-01-22T19:15:44Z2024-01-22T19:15:44Z2023-12-06http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/23231instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABreponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.coEl reemplazo total de cadera o también llamado artroplastia total de cadera es un procedimiento quirúrgico en el cual se reemplaza los componentes anatómicos que conforman la articulación de la cadera debido a patologías en las cuales se pierde o altera la anatomía normal, causando intenso dolor y afectación de la calidad de vida, por elementos metálicos, cerámicas, polímeros entre otros, que intentan restablecer la funcionalidad coxofemoral. Las principales indicaciones causales del reemplazo total de cadera son la osteoartritis (que representó el 90% de los procedimientos en el Reino Unido en 2017), fractura del cuello del fémur (5%), necrosis avascular (2%), displasia (2%) y artritis inflamatoria. (1%). La osteoartritis de cadera tiene causas multifactoriales, con componentes biológicos y mecánicos dictados por factores genéticos y ambientales. En este estudio se pretende conocer cuáles son los factores e intervenciones que mejoran la percepción de los pacientes en el post operatorio, así como la satisfacción y mejoría de calidad de vida posterior al manejo quirúrgico de reemplazo total de cadera en pacientes intervenidos por el grupo de Ortopedia y Traumatología de la Clínica Foscal y Foscal Internacional. 1.2 Metodología Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. Análisis secundario de una base de datos anonimizada del servicio de ortopedia en el que se incluyen pacientes con patologías de la articulación coxofemoral a quienes se realizó reemplazo total primario de cadera con prótesis cementada o no cementada en la clínica Foscal y Foscal internacional durante el periodo de junio de 2020 a diciembre de 2022. Se utilizó para el estudio la base de datos anonimizada que se ha venido llevando desde el 2020 donde se tomaron datos sociodemográficos, diagnóstico por el que se llevó a cabo la cirugía, características de la prótesis, medidas antropométricas de los pacientes, complicaciones tempranas y tardías, nivel de satisfacción medido con escalas, la cual fue diligenciada al momento de la cirugía para su posterior análisis estadístico.1. Resumen del Proyecto 1.1 Introducción 1.2 Metodología 1.3 Resultados 1.4 Conclusiones 2. Justificación 3. Marco teórico 3.1 Generalidades articulación coxofemoral 3.1.1 Embriología 3.1.2 Anatomía 3.1.3 Biomecánica 3.2 Patologías de la cadera que afectan la relación articular coxofemoral: 3.2.1 Patología degenerativa 3.2.2 Patología traumáticas 3.2.3 Patologia vasculares 3.3 Reemplazo total de cadera (RTC) 3.3.1 Generalidades del RTC 3.3.2 indicaciones del RTC 3.3.3 Tipos de prótesis 3.3.4 abordajes quirúrgicos en el RTC 3.3.5 Complicaciones post quirúrgicas 3.4 Escalas de evaluación postquirúrgicas para evaluar satisfacción en un RTC 4. Estado del arte 5. Objetivos 5.1 Objetivo general 5.2 Objetivos específicos 6. Metodología 6.1 Tipo de estudio 6.2 Población 6.3 Criterios de inclusión 6.4 Criterios de exclusión 6.5 Cálculo del tamaño de muestra 6.6 Muestreo 6.7 Recolección de la información 6.8 Variables 6.9 Plan de análisis de datos 6.10 Consideraciones éticas 7. Resultados/impactos esperados 8. Resultados 9. Discusión 10. Conclusiones 11. Referencias Bibliográficas 12. AnexosEspecializaciónTotal hip replacement or also called total hip arthroplasty is a surgical procedure in which the anatomical components that make up the hip joint are replaced due to pathologies in which the normal anatomy is lost or altered, causing intense pain and impairment. of the quality of life, due to metallic elements, ceramics, polymers among others, which attempt to restore coxofemoral functionality. The main causal indications for total hip replacement are osteoarthritis (which accounted for 90% of procedures in the UK in 2017), fracture of the neck of the femur (5%), avascular necrosis (2%), dysplasia (2% ) and inflammatory arthritis. (1%). Hip osteoarthritis has multifactorial causes, with biological and mechanical components dictated by genetic and environmental factors. This study aims to know which factors and interventions improve the perception of patients in the postoperative period, as well as the satisfaction and improvement in quality of life after the surgical management of total hip replacement in patients operated on by the group of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Foscal and Foscal International Clinic. 1.2 Methodology Retrospective cohort study. Secondary analysis of an anonymized database of the orthopedic service that includes patients with coxofemoral joint pathologies who underwent primary total hip replacement with cemented or cementless prosthesis at the Foscal and Foscal international clinic during the study period. June 2020 to December 2022. The anonymized database that has been maintained since 2020 was used for the study, where sociodemographic data, diagnosis for which the surgery was carried out, characteristics of the prosthesis, anthropometric measurements were taken. of patients, early and late complications, level of satisfaction measured with scales, which was completed at the time of surgery for subsequent statistical analysis.Introduction L'arthroplastie totale de la hanche ou également appelée arthroplastie totale de la hanche est une intervention chirurgicale dans laquelle les composants anatomiques qui composent l'articulation de la hanche sont remplacés en raison de pathologies dans lesquelles l'anatomie normale est perdue ou altérée, provoquant une douleur intense et une altération de la qualité de vie. , due à des éléments métalliques, céramiques, polymères entre autres, qui tentent de restaurer la fonctionnalité coxofémorale. Les principales indications causales de l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche sont l'arthrose (qui représentait 90 % des interventions au Royaume-Uni en 2017), les fractures du col du fémur (5 %), la nécrose avasculaire (2 %), la dysplasie (2 %) et arthrite inflammatoire. (1%). L'arthrose de la hanche a des causes multifactorielles, avec des composantes biologiques et mécaniques dictées par des facteurs génétiques et environnementaux. Cette étude vise à savoir quels facteurs et interventions améliorent la perception des patients en période postopératoire, ainsi que la satisfaction et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie après la prise en charge chirurgicale d'une arthroplastie totale de la hanche chez les patients opérés par le groupe d'orthopédie et de traumatologie de la Clinique Foscal et Foscal International. 1.2 Méthodologie Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Analyse secondaire d'une base de données anonymisée du service d'orthopédie qui inclut des patients atteints de pathologies de l'articulation coxo-fémorale ayant subi une arthroplastie totale primaire de la hanche avec prothèse cimentée ou sans ciment à la clinique internationale Foscal et Foscal pendant la période d'étude de juin 2020 à décembre 2022. La base de données anonymisée qui a été maintenue depuis 2020 a été utilisée pour l'étude, où des données sociodémographiques, le diagnostic pour lequel l'intervention chirurgicale a été réalisée, les caractéristiques de la prothèse, les mesures anthropométriques des patients, les complications précoces et tardives, le niveau de satisfaction mesuré avec des échelles, qui a été complété au moment de la chirurgie pour une analyse statistique ultérieure.Modalidad Presencialapplication/pdfspahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Factores asociados a la satisfacción del paciente en el post operatorio de reemplazo total de caderaFactors associated with patient satisfaction in the post-operative operation of total hip replacementThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMEspecialista en Ortopedia y TraumatologíaUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABFacultad Ciencias de la SaludEspecialización en Ortopedia y TraumatologíaMedical sciencesHealth sciencesHipsReplacementArthroplastyOsteoarthritisPatientsSatisfactionOrthopedicsSurgeryPost surgicalMedical attentionSurgical clinicsHealth institutionsHip prosthesisHip replacement arthroplastyCiencias médicasAtención médicaClínicas quirúrgicasInstituciones de saludPrótesis de caderaArtroplastia de remplazo de caderaCaderasReemplazoArtroplastiaArtrosisPacientesSatisfacciónOrtopediaCirugíaPost quirúrgico1. Reznick E, Embry KR, Neuman R, Bolívar-nieto E, Fey NP, Gregg RD. Lower-limb kinematics and kinetics during continuously varying human locomotion. 2021;1–12.2. Sacitharan PK. Ageing and osteoarthritis. Vol. 91, Subcellular Biochemistry. 2019. 123–159 p.3. Bank W. World Population Ageing 2019 [Internet]. World Population Ageing 2019. 2019. 64 p. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5204-7_6Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury [Internet]. 2018;49(8):1458–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.0155. Coughlin TA, Nightingale JM, Myint Y, Forward DP, Norrish AR, Ollivere BJ. Patient-reported outcomes in young patients with isolated fracture of the hip : MEAN 57 MONTHS’ FOLLOW-UP. Bone Jt J. 2020;102(6):766–71.6. Славковић Н, Вукашиновић З, Башчаревић З, Вукомановић Б. Тотална алоартропластика кука. 2012;140:379–84.7. Lyman S, Ms YL, Franklin PD, Li W, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Validation of the HOOS , JR : A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;8. Lee MC, Eberson CP. Growth and Development of the Child’s Hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;37(2):119–32.9. DISPLASIA DE LA CADERA EN DESARROLLO - GUÍA CLÍNICA - Gabriel Ochoa Del Portillo - 2020 - Mayo de 2020 (2).pdf.10. Seeley MA, Georgiadis AG, Sankar WN. Hip Vascularity : A Review of the Abstract. 2016;24(8):515–26.11. Fernández-tormos E, Dantas P, Marín-pe O, Rego P, Pérez-carro L. Anatomía y función de la articulación coxofemoral . Anatomía artroscópica de la cadera. 2016;3(1):3–10.12. Rego P, Mascarenhas V, Collado D, Coelho A, Barbosa L, Ganz R. Arterial Topographic Anatomy Near the Femoral Head-Neck Perforation with Surgical Relevance. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2017;99(14):1213–21.13. Walters BL, Cooper JH, Rodriguez JA. New findings in hip capsular anatomy: Dimensions of capsular thickness and pericapsular contributions. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg [Internet]. 2014;30(10):1235–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.01214. Dunoyer J. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. 2001;83(January):149–52.15. Gardner MJ, Sussmann PS. The surgical anatomy of the blood supply to the femoral head DESCRIPTION OF THE ANASTOMOSIS BETWEEN THE MEDIAL FEMORAL CIRCUMFLEX AND INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERIES AT. :1298–303.16. Sariali E, Klouche S, Mamoudy P. Investigation into three dimensional hip anatomy in anterior dislocation after THA. Influence of the position of the hip rotation centre. Clin Biomech [Internet]. 2012;27(6):562–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.12.01417. Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C. Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(6):1329–36.18. Warrener AG. Hominin Hip Biomechanics: Changing Perspectives. Anat Rec. 2017;300(5):932–45.19. Polkowski GG, Clohisy JC. Hip Biomechanics. 2010;18(2):56–62.20. Meneses Monroy A, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Ursúa ME, Caparrós N, Ruiz de Ocenda MI, López L, et al. Validation of the living with osteoarthritis in Spanish population. Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2021;53(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.10204421. Lespasio MJ, Sultan AA, Piuzzi NS, Khlopas A, Husni ME, Muschler GF, et al. Hip Osteoarthritis: A Primer. Perm J. 2018;22:89–94.22. Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, et al. Prevalence of Hip Symptoms and Radiographic and Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians : The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. 2009;809–15.23. Dc SD, Garbedian S, Wai EK. Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Radiographic Primary Hip Osteoarthritis. 2009;623–37.24. Bernad-Pineda M, de las Heras-Sotos J, Garcés-Puentes M V. Calidad de vida en pacientes con artrosis de rodilla y/o cadera. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol [Internet]. 2014;58(5):283–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2014.04.00525. Orthopaedics C. Classifications in Brief. 2016;83:1886–93.26. Shapira J, Chen JW, Bheem R, Rosinsky PJ, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, et al. Binary Tönnis classification: simplified modification demonstrates better inter- And intra-observer reliability as well as agreement in surgical management of hip pathology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):1–9.27. Stevens JA, Rudd RA. The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(10):2725–8.28. Li T, Zhang QS. Is dynamic locking plate superior than other implants for intracapsular hip fracture A meta-analysis. Med (United States). 2018;97(47).29. Chiron P, Lafontan V, Reina N. Fracture-dislocations of the femoral head. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2013;99(1):S53–66. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.00730. Tonetti J, Ruatti S, Lafontan V, Loubignac F, Chiron P, Sari-Ali H, et al. Is femoral head fracture-dislocation management improvable: A retrospective study in 110 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(6):623–31.31. Romeo NM, Firoozabadi R. Classifications in Brief: The Pipkin Classification of Femoral Head Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(5):1114–9.32. A.V. F, J.R. L, G.J. H, K.J. K. Femoral neck fractures: Current management. J Orthop Trauma [Internet]. 2015;29(3):121–9. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L602056695%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.000000000000029133. Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S. Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(1):S27–32.34. Schwarz N. Was bleibt von der frakturklassifikation nach pauwels? Eine kritische literaturanalyse. Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;148(2):191–7.35. Van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Genelin F, Meylaerts SAG, Roukema GR. The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2012;98(4):405–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.02.00336. Moya-angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM, Moya-angeler J, et al. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. 2015;6(8):590–601.37. Seijas R, Sallent A, Rivera E, Ares O, Seijas R, Sallent A, et al. Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head. J Investig Surg [Internet]. 2017;0(0):1–2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2017.139828238. Lieberman JR. Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head : Evaluation and Treatment. 2014;22(7):455–64.39. Scully SP. In Brief : Ficat Classification : Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head. 2012;2636–9.40. Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1662–71.41. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: Updated projections to 2021. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2014;96(8):624–30.42. Santori N, Falez F, Potestio D, Santori FS. Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement. 2019;55–61.43. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS. Durability of the Cemented Femoral Stem in Patients. 2004;(419):115–23.44. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Rasquinha VJ. Mastering the Art of Cemented Femoral Stem Fixation. 2004;19(4):85–91.45. Morán D, Navarro N, García N, Caballero R. Biomecánica de la prótesis total de cadera cementada y no cementada. 2011;(v).46. Rodriguez A. Acetabular Fixation Options : Notes from the Other Side. 2006;21(4):93–6.47. Berend KR, Lombardi A V, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Cementless Double-Tapered Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 75 Years of Age and Older. 2004;19(3):288–95.48. Yates P, Tr F, Serjeant S, Rushforth G, Middleton R, Tr F. The Relative Cost of Cemented and Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasties. 2006;21(1):102–5.49. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. 2013;3–8.50. Howard JL, Lanting BL. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. 2015;58:128–40.51. Horne PH, Olson SA. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. 2011;139–45.52. Burnett SJ, Abos D. Total hip arthroplasty: Techniques and results. 2010;(November):455–64.53. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes ( PROs ). 2013;54. Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P. Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Hueter Anterior Approach. 2008;23(2):266–72.55. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical Approach , Abductor Function , and Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation. 2002;(405):46–53.56. Pellicci PM, Potter HG, Foo LF, Boettner F. MRI Shows Biologic Restoration of Posterior Soft Tissue Repairs after THA. 2009;940–5.57. Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does Surgical Approach Affect Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Rates ? 2006;(447):34–8.58. Kiyama T, Naito M. Hip Abductor Strengths After Total Hip Arthroplasty Via the Lateral and Posterolateral Approaches. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2010;25(1):76–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.00159. Jewett BA, Collis DK. High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table. 2011;503–7.60. Hendel D, Yasin M, Garti A, Weisbort M, Beloosesky Y. Fracture of the greater trochanter during hip replace- ment. 2002;73(3):295–7.61. Khan T, Orth F, Orth M. Damage to the Superior Gluteal Nerve During the Direct Lateral Approach to the Hip A Cadaveric Study. 2007;22(8):1198–200.62. Goulding K, Beaule PE, Kim PR, Ma AF. Incidence of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Neuropraxia After Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty. 2010;2397–404.63. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of 850 Patients. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2011;26(2):209–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.01364. Palazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, et al. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: The role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1–9.65. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017;32(12):3854–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.02166. Lynskey SJ, Ling F, Greenberg AM, Penny-Dimri JC, Sutherland AG. The influence of patient resilience and health status on satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Surgeon [Internet]. 2021;19(1):8–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.00767. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) - Validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:1–8.68. Garabano G, Lopreite FA, Mana Pastrian D, Robador N, Del Sel H. Satisfacción del paciente luego de una artroplastia de cadera o rodilla. Rev la Asoc Argentina Ortop y Traumatol. 2012;77(2):112.69. Strassburger-Weidmann J, Vélez-de Lachica J. Satisfacción del paciente operado de artroplastía primaria de cadera con abordaje anterior, lateral y posterior. Acta Ortopédica Mex. 2019;33(6):395–9.70. Soh SE, Harris IA, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves SE, et al. Implications for research and clinical use from a Rasch analysis of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments. Osteoarthr Cartil [Internet]. 2021;29(6):824–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.56871. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2007;89(7):893–90072. Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement: A five-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2007;89(7):868–73.73. Anderson JA, Mason JA, Halliday B. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with inherited bleeding disorders: A 20-year single-surgeon cohort. Haemophilia. 2018;24(5):786–91.74. den Daas A, Reitsma EA, Knobben BAS, Ten Have BLEF, Somford MP. Patient satisfaction in different approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2019;105(7):1277–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.00375. Conner-Spady BL, Bohm E, Loucks L, Dunbar MJ, Marshall DA, Noseworthy TW. Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2020;29(3):705–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02359-776. Ponzio DY, Rothermel SD, Chiu YF, Stavrakis AI, Lyman S, Windsor RE. Does Physical Activity Level Influence Total Hip Arthroplasty Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcomes? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2021;36(8):2850–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.05277. Van Meirhaeghe JP, Alarkawi D, Kowalik T, Du-Moulin W, Molnar R, Adie S. Predicting dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty using a Bayesian model averaging approach: Results from the Australian Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN). ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(9):1908–13.78. Nissen T, Douw K, Overgaard S. Patient-reported outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and standard total hip replacement after short-term follow-up. 2011;58(10).79. Escandón S, Parada C, Gonzalo L, Molano J. Ortopedia y Traumatología y la aparición de eventos adversos perioperatorios. Rev Colomb Ortop y Traumatol [Internet]. 2020;27(4):205–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0120-8845(13)70021-X80. Tr F, Fick D, Hons M, Haebich S, Phys B, Khan RJK, et al. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Hip Pain , Function , and Satisfaction Ten Years following Total Hip Arthroplasty . J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2019; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.04681. Shan L, Shan B, Graham D, Saxena A. Total hip replacement : a systematic review and meta-analysis on mid-term quality of life. Osteoarthr Cartil [Internet]. 2014;22(3):389–406. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.00682. Greimel F, Maderbacher G, Zeman F, Grifka J. No clinical difference comparing general, regional and combination anesthesia in hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort-study regarding perioperative pain management and patient satisfaction. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.03883. Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Le S, Bonutti PM, Delanois RE, et al. What In fl uences How Patients Rate Their Hospital After Total Hip Arthroplasty ? J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2016;1–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.06084. Schaal T, Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J. Determinants of patient satisfaction and their willingness to return after primary total hip replacement : a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2016;1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1196-385. Rolfson O, Donahue GS, Hallsten M, Nemes S. Patient-reported outcomes in cemented and uncemented total hip replacements. 2016;26(5):451–7.https://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/omar-alejandro-amado-picoORIGINALTesis.pdfTesis.pdfTesisapplication/pdf1010511https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/1/Tesis.pdf0179543c0d99b962dfc945dbea59216dMD51open accessLicencia.pdfLicencia.pdfLicenciaapplication/pdf287482https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/5/Licencia.pdf83798ff13508675576f5b4f0a3330bc7MD55metadata only accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/4/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD54open accessTHUMBNAILTesis.pdf.jpgTesis.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6195https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/6/Tesis.pdf.jpgd14c57ae130fed96b634793cf873de53MD56open accessLicencia.pdf.jpgLicencia.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9847https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/23231/7/Licencia.pdf.jpg7a0e4b4f65b52fa1f452c3003ae26d00MD57metadata only access20.500.12749/23231oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/232312024-01-22 22:00:54.022open accessRepositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.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

Publicaciones similares