Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico

La catarata (33%) y los errores refractivos no corregidos (42%) son las principales causas de ceguera prevenible en el mundo según estadísticas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 2010(1). Así mismo, la discapacidad visual está presente en mayor número en las personas mayores de 50 años,...

Full description

Autores:: Cianci Peñaranda, Marcela Fernanda

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB

Repositorio:: Repositorio UNAB

Idioma:: spa

id	UNAB2_c5ac5dfe0186c63f4963ae5f8b7c7d3e
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/18697
network_acronym_str	UNAB2
network_name_str	Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Evaluation of the biometric prediction error with the total corneal power vs. keratometric index, after implantation of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens
title	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
spellingShingle	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico Medical sciences Health sciences Ophthalmology Visual disability Patients Quality of life Diseases of the lens (Eyes) Intraocular lenses Artificial implants Refraction Vision disorders Oftalmología Ciencias médicas Enfermedades del cristalino (Ojos) Lentes intraoculares Implantes artificiales Refracción Trastornos de la visión Ciencias de la salud Pacientes Calidad de vida Discapacidad visual
title_short	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
title_full	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
title_fullStr	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
title_sort	Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Cianci Peñaranda, Marcela Fernanda
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Cianci Peñaranda, Marcela Fernanda
dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro [0001009125] Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [0000552453]
dc.contributor.googlescholar.spa.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro [puxZHKYAAAAJ]
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro [0000-0001-5081-0720]
dc.contributor.scopus.spa.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro [6603664598] Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [55963715000]
dc.contributor.researchgate.spa.fl_str_mv	Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [Virgilio_Galvis]
dc.contributor.apolounab.spa.fl_str_mv	Tello Hernández, Alejandro [alejandro-tello-hernández] Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [virgilio-galvis-ramirez]
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv	Medical sciences Health sciences Ophthalmology Visual disability Patients Quality of life Diseases of the lens (Eyes) Intraocular lenses Artificial implants Refraction Vision disorders
topic	Medical sciences Health sciences Ophthalmology Visual disability Patients Quality of life Diseases of the lens (Eyes) Intraocular lenses Artificial implants Refraction Vision disorders Oftalmología Ciencias médicas Enfermedades del cristalino (Ojos) Lentes intraoculares Implantes artificiales Refracción Trastornos de la visión Ciencias de la salud Pacientes Calidad de vida Discapacidad visual
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv	Oftalmología Ciencias médicas Enfermedades del cristalino (Ojos) Lentes intraoculares Implantes artificiales Refracción Trastornos de la visión
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	Ciencias de la salud Pacientes Calidad de vida Discapacidad visual
description	La catarata (33%) y los errores refractivos no corregidos (42%) son las principales causas de ceguera prevenible en el mundo según estadísticas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 2010(1). Así mismo, la discapacidad visual está presente en mayor número en las personas mayores de 50 años, grupo en el que es especialmente prevalente la catarata. La catarata se describe como la opacificación del cristalino y la más común de ellas es la catarata senil, que se desarrolla a partir de la sexta década de la vida. A medida que se desarrolla la opacificación del cristalino, la agudeza visual empieza a disminuir paulatinamente, y de no frenarse, puede limitar la visión de manera tan importante que modifica el estilo y la calidad de vida del paciente, considerándose una discapacidad visual. Al no existir un tratamiento médico, su única alternativa de tratamiento es quirúrgica, removiendo la catarata e implantando en su lugar un lente intraocular (LIO) devolviendo así la transparencia de los medios, e idealmente, logrando un equivalente esférico neutro. El desarrollo y la evolución de las técnicas quirúrgicas han llevado, así mismo, a un crecimiento acelerado en el desarrollo de lentes intraoculares que, hoy por hoy, brindan una gran satisfacción visual a los pacientes. Para lograr esto, es necesario tener en cuenta un gran número de factores, desde los inherentes al paciente y su anatomía, expectativas visuales, defectos refractivos previos, pasando por el equipo a utilizar, los insumos, y entre ellos, los lentes intraoculares (LIOs).
publishDate	2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-01-17T20:58:18Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-01-17T20:58:18Z
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Tesis
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18697
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18697
identifier_str_mv	instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Salud ocular universal : un plan de acción mundial para 2014-2019. Congdon, N. (2004). Prevalence of Cataract and Pseudophakia/Aphakia among Adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 122(4), 487–494. Saaddine L, Benjamin S, Pan L, Venkat Narayan K, Tierney E, Kanjilal S, et al. Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Selected Eye Diseases Among Persons Aged >50 Years With and Without Diabetes --- United States, 2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(45):1069–71. Klein BE, Howard KP, Lee KE, Klein R. Changing Incidence of Lens Extraction Over Twenty Years: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):1–11. Guo C, Wang Z, He P, Chen G, Zheng X. Prevalence, causes and social factors of visual impairment among Chinese Adults: based on a national survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1034):1–11. Al-Sheikh M, Iafe NA, Phasukkijwatana N, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Biomarkers of neovascular activity in age-related macular degeneration using OCT angiography. Retina. 2017;1. Gollogly HE, Hodge DO, St. Sauver JL, Erie JC. Increasing incidence of cataract surgery: Population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(9):1383–9. Steinert RF, Chang DF, Bissen-Miyajima H, Fine IH, Gimbel H V, Koch DD, et al. Cataract Surgery. 2010. all. Lorente R, Mendicute J (eds) Cirugía Del Cristalino. Sociedad Española de Oftalmología: Madrid, Spain, 2008; 1751–1767. Bobrow JC, Beardsley TL, Jick SL, Rosenberg LF, Wiggins MN, Reich J, et al. Lens and cataract, Section 11. Basic and Clinical Science Course, American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2014. all. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Karabela Y, Eliacik M, Kocabora MS, Erdur SK, Baybora H. Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1143–9. Kim YN, Park JH, Tchah H. Quantitative Analysis of Lens Nuclear Density Using Optical Coherence Tomography ( OCT ) with a Liquid Optics Interface : Correlation between OCT Images and LOCS III Grading. J Ophthalmol. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2016;2016. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. The Effect of Polymethylmethacrylate , Silicone , and Polyacrylic Intraocular Lenses on Posterior Capsular Opacification 3 Years after Cataract Surgery. :49–55. Laboratories A. Product information AcrySof IQ Aspheric IOL. 2010. p. 1–14. Wintergerst MWM, Schultz T, Birtel J, Schuster AK, Pfeiffer N, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. Algorithms for the Automated Analysis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Biomarkers on Optical Coherence Tomography: A Systematic Review. Transl Vis Sci 49 Technol. 2017;6(4):10. Liao X, Peng Y, Liu B, Tan QQ, Lan CJ. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Scientific Reports. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):1-6. Wan KH, Lam TC, Marco CY, Chan TC. Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia. American journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Sep 1;205:66-73. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Prediction accuracy of preinstalled formulas on 2 optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(3):358–62. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power : a review The statistical. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;472–85. Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon J-W. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas. BMC Ophthalmol. BMC Ophthalmology; 2017;17(1):62. Plat J, Hoa D, Mura F, Busetto T, Schneider C, Payerols A, et al. Clinical and biometric determinants of actual lens position after cataract surgery. J Cart Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(2):195–200. Roberts T V, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M. Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery: Calculation of intraocular lens power. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;46(3):240–6. Kongsap P. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients. Eye Vis. Eye and Vision; 2016;3(1):27. Ventura B V., Ventura MC, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(1):74–9. Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(8):1165–72. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Rezvan F, Fotouhi A, Asgari S, Miraftab M. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(4):307. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169–78. Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490–500. Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Aug;26(8):1233–7. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound 50 biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73. Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73. Song, J. S., Yoon, D. Y., Hyon, J. Y., & Jeon, H. S. (2020). Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 34(2), 126–132. Darcy K, Gunn D, Tavassoli S, Sparrow J, Kane JX. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014. PMID: 32050225. Ekkehard, F. (22 de April de 2019). Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas. Journal of refractive surgery, 35(6), 362-368. Sabong, & Srivannaboon, S. (2019). Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery. Springer. Sandoval HP, Serels C, Potvin R, Solomon KD. Cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: objective analysis to determine best formula and keratometry to use. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2021; 47:465–470. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000472. Lee H, Chung JL, Kim YJ, Kim JY, Tchah H. Prediction accuracy of standard and total keratometry by swept-source optical biometer for multifocal intraocular lens power calculation. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11:4794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84238-1. Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2016; 42:1490–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021. Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2017; 43:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.021. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027.
dc.relation.uriapolo.spa.fl_str_mv	https://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/alejandro-tello-hern%C3%A1ndez
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.creativecommons.*.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ Abierto (Texto Completo) Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv	Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia)
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv	2022
dc.publisher.grantor.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Especialización en Oftalmología
institution	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/1/2022_Tesis_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/2/2022_Licencia_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/4/2022_Tesis_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpg https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/5/2022_Licencia_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpg https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	9e783330934525e2765a6fb62028b7f1 f9cc86012f2809bf71f096b7bf346949 e909bd423f8fe6c17c6bf0f2ae1e925c a94d3b9b8e69816b18937027f492ae72 3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_	1814277406785011712
spelling	Tello Hernández, Alejandro7ae428b7-0b9b-4aff-9bbf-6940dcfd7cb5Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio5395c80a-0da1-46ef-87b5-05e4bb4cc16dCianci Peñaranda, Marcela Fernanda7cb3d3f4-9e22-4bf3-b819-e9f41bdd31b4Tello Hernández, Alejandro [0001009125]Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [0000552453]Tello Hernández, Alejandro [puxZHKYAAAAJ]Tello Hernández, Alejandro [0000-0001-5081-0720]Tello Hernández, Alejandro [6603664598]Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [55963715000]Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [Virgilio_Galvis]Tello Hernández, Alejandro [alejandro-tello-hernández]Galvis Ramírez, Virgilio [virgilio-galvis-ramirez]Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia)20222023-01-17T20:58:18Z2023-01-17T20:58:18Z2022http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18697instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABreponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.coLa catarata (33%) y los errores refractivos no corregidos (42%) son las principales causas de ceguera prevenible en el mundo según estadísticas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) en 2010(1). Así mismo, la discapacidad visual está presente en mayor número en las personas mayores de 50 años, grupo en el que es especialmente prevalente la catarata. La catarata se describe como la opacificación del cristalino y la más común de ellas es la catarata senil, que se desarrolla a partir de la sexta década de la vida. A medida que se desarrolla la opacificación del cristalino, la agudeza visual empieza a disminuir paulatinamente, y de no frenarse, puede limitar la visión de manera tan importante que modifica el estilo y la calidad de vida del paciente, considerándose una discapacidad visual. Al no existir un tratamiento médico, su única alternativa de tratamiento es quirúrgica, removiendo la catarata e implantando en su lugar un lente intraocular (LIO) devolviendo así la transparencia de los medios, e idealmente, logrando un equivalente esférico neutro. El desarrollo y la evolución de las técnicas quirúrgicas han llevado, así mismo, a un crecimiento acelerado en el desarrollo de lentes intraoculares que, hoy por hoy, brindan una gran satisfacción visual a los pacientes. Para lograr esto, es necesario tener en cuenta un gran número de factores, desde los inherentes al paciente y su anatomía, expectativas visuales, defectos refractivos previos, pasando por el equipo a utilizar, los insumos, y entre ellos, los lentes intraoculares (LIOs).Resúmen del proyecto: .................................................................................................. 4 1. Justificación: ......................................................................................................... 10 2. Marco teórico: ...................................................................................................... 11 3. Estado del Arte: .................................................................................................... 16 4. Objetivos .............................................................................................................. 18 4.1 Objetivo General:............................................................................................. 18 4.2 Objetivos Especificos: ...................................................................................... 18 5. Metodología ......................................................................................................... 18 5.1 Tipo de estudio ................................................................................................ 18 5.2 Población ........................................................................................................ 18 5.3 Criterios de inclusión ....................................................................................... 18 5.4 Criterios de exclusión ...................................................................................... 19 5.5 Calculo de tamaño de muestra ........................................................................ 19 5.6 Muestreo ........................................................................................................ 19 5.7 Recolección de la información ......................................................................... 19 5.8 Variables ......................................................................................................... 20 5.9.Plan de análisis de datos ................................................................................. 31 5.10 Consideraciones éticas................................................................................... 31 6. Resultados esperados ........................................................................................... 32 6.1 Relacionados con la generación de nuevo conocimiento .................................. 32 6.2 Conducentes al fortalecimiento de la capacidad científica institucional ............ 33 6.3 Dirigidos a la apropiación social del conocimiento ........................................... 33 7. Impactos esperados a partir del uso de los resultados ........................................... 34 8. Resultados ............................................................................................................ 35 9. Discusión .............................................................................................................. 44 10. Conclusiones ......................................................................................................... 46 11. Referencias bibliográficas ..................................................................................... 48 Anexos ........................................................................................................................ 51 ANEXO 1 ...................................................................................................................... 51 Cronograma de Actividades ......................................................................................... 51 ANEXO 2 ...................................................................................................................... 51 Presupuesto ................................................................................................................ 51EspecializaciónCataract (33%) and uncorrected refractive errors (42%) are the main causes of preventable blindness in the world according to statistics from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010(1). Likewise, visual impairment is present in greater numbers in people over 50 years of age, a group in which cataracts are especially prevalent. The cataract is described as the opacification of the lens and the most common of them is the senile cataract, which develops from the sixth decade of life. As lens opacification develops, visual acuity begins to gradually decrease, and if not stopped, it can limit vision so significantly that it modifies the patient's style and quality of life, being considered a visual impairment. In the absence of medical treatment, their only treatment alternative is surgery, removing the cataract and implanting an intraocular lens (IOL) in its place, thus restoring the transparency of the media, and ideally, achieving a neutral spherical equivalent. The development and evolution of surgical techniques have also led to an accelerated growth in the development of intraocular lenses that, today, provide great visual satisfaction to patients. To achieve this, it is necessary to take into account a large number of factors, from those inherent to the patient and their anatomy, visual expectations, previous refractive errors, going through the equipment to be used, supplies, and among them, intraocular lenses (IOLs). ).application/pdfspahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asféricoEvaluation of the biometric prediction error with the total corneal power vs. keratometric index, after implantation of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lensEspecialista en OftalmologíaUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABFacultad Ciencias de la SaludEspecialización en Oftalmologíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMMedical sciencesHealth sciencesOphthalmologyVisual disabilityPatientsQuality of lifeDiseases of the lens (Eyes)Intraocular lensesArtificial implantsRefractionVision disordersOftalmologíaCiencias médicasEnfermedades del cristalino (Ojos)Lentes intraocularesImplantes artificialesRefracciónTrastornos de la visiónCiencias de la saludPacientesCalidad de vidaDiscapacidad visualSalud ocular universal : un plan de acción mundial para 2014-2019.Congdon, N. (2004). Prevalence of Cataract and Pseudophakia/Aphakia among Adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 122(4), 487–494.Saaddine L, Benjamin S, Pan L, Venkat Narayan K, Tierney E, Kanjilal S, et al. Prevalence of Visual Impairment and Selected Eye Diseases Among Persons Aged >50 Years With and Without Diabetes --- United States, 2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(45):1069–71.Klein BE, Howard KP, Lee KE, Klein R. Changing Incidence of Lens Extraction Over Twenty Years: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):1–11.Guo C, Wang Z, He P, Chen G, Zheng X. Prevalence, causes and social factors of visual impairment among Chinese Adults: based on a national survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1034):1–11.Al-Sheikh M, Iafe NA, Phasukkijwatana N, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Biomarkers of neovascular activity in age-related macular degeneration using OCT angiography. Retina. 2017;1.Gollogly HE, Hodge DO, St. Sauver JL, Erie JC. Increasing incidence of cataract surgery: Population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(9):1383–9.Steinert RF, Chang DF, Bissen-Miyajima H, Fine IH, Gimbel H V, Koch DD, et al. Cataract Surgery. 2010. all.Lorente R, Mendicute J (eds) Cirugía Del Cristalino. Sociedad Española de Oftalmología: Madrid, Spain, 2008; 1751–1767.Bobrow JC, Beardsley TL, Jick SL, Rosenberg LF, Wiggins MN, Reich J, et al. Lens and cataract, Section 11. Basic and Clinical Science Course, American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2014. all.Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993Karabela Y, Eliacik M, Kocabora MS, Erdur SK, Baybora H. Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1143–9.Kim YN, Park JH, Tchah H. Quantitative Analysis of Lens Nuclear Density Using Optical Coherence Tomography ( OCT ) with a Liquid Optics Interface : Correlation between OCT Images and LOCS III Grading. J Ophthalmol. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2016;2016.Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. The Effect of Polymethylmethacrylate , Silicone , and Polyacrylic Intraocular Lenses on Posterior Capsular Opacification 3 Years after Cataract Surgery. :49–55.Laboratories A. Product information AcrySof IQ Aspheric IOL. 2010. p. 1–14.Wintergerst MWM, Schultz T, Birtel J, Schuster AK, Pfeiffer N, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. Algorithms for the Automated Analysis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Biomarkers on Optical Coherence Tomography: A Systematic Review. Transl Vis Sci 49 Technol. 2017;6(4):10.Liao X, Peng Y, Liu B, Tan QQ, Lan CJ. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Scientific Reports. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):1-6.Wan KH, Lam TC, Marco CY, Chan TC. Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia. American journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Sep 1;205:66-73.Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Prediction accuracy of preinstalled formulas on 2 optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(3):358–62.Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power : a review The statistical. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;472–85.Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon J-W. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas. BMC Ophthalmol. BMC Ophthalmology; 2017;17(1):62.Plat J, Hoa D, Mura F, Busetto T, Schneider C, Payerols A, et al. Clinical and biometric determinants of actual lens position after cataract surgery. J Cart Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(2):195–200.Roberts T V, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M. Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery: Calculation of intraocular lens power. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;46(3):240–6.Kongsap P. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients. Eye Vis. Eye and Vision; 2016;3(1):27.Ventura B V., Ventura MC, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2017;43(1):74–9.Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. ASCRS and ESCRS; 2016;42(8):1165–72.Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Rezvan F, Fotouhi A, Asgari S, Miraftab M. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(4):307.Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169–78.Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490–500.Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Aug;26(8):1233–7.Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound 50 biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73.Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:765–73.Song, J. S., Yoon, D. Y., Hyon, J. Y., & Jeon, H. S. (2020). Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 34(2), 126–132.Darcy K, Gunn D, Tavassoli S, Sparrow J, Kane JX. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014. PMID: 32050225.Ekkehard, F. (22 de April de 2019). Prediction Accuracy of Total Keratometry Compared to Standard Keratometry Using Different Intraocular Lens Power Formulas. Journal of refractive surgery, 35(6), 362-368.Sabong, & Srivannaboon, S. (2019). Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery. Springer.Sandoval HP, Serels C, Potvin R, Solomon KD. Cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: objective analysis to determine best formula and keratometry to use. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2021; 47:465–470. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000472.Lee H, Chung JL, Kim YJ, Kim JY, Tchah H. Prediction accuracy of standard and total keratometry by swept-source optical biometer for multifocal intraocular lens power calculation. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11:4794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84238-1.Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2016; 42:1490–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021.Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2017; 43:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.021.Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027.https://apolo.unab.edu.co/en/persons/alejandro-tello-hern%C3%A1ndezORIGINAL2022_Tesis_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf2022_Tesis_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdfTesisapplication/pdf707092https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/1/2022_Tesis_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf9e783330934525e2765a6fb62028b7f1MD51open access2022_Licencia_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf2022_Licencia_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdfLicenciaapplication/pdf108985https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/2/2022_Licencia_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdff9cc86012f2809bf71f096b7bf346949MD52metadata only accessTHUMBNAIL2022_Tesis_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpg2022_Tesis_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6907https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/4/2022_Tesis_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpge909bd423f8fe6c17c6bf0f2ae1e925cMD54open access2022_Licencia_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpg2022_Licencia_Cianci_Peñaranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg12070https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/5/2022_Licencia_Cianci_Pe%c3%b1aranda_Marcela_Fernanda.pdf.jpga94d3b9b8e69816b18937027f492ae72MD55metadata only accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/18697/3/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD53open access20.500.12749/18697oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/186972023-01-17 22:00:27.795open accessRepositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.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

Evaluación del error de predicción biométrico con el poder corneal total vs índice queratométrico, posterior a implante de lente intraocular monofocal asférico

Publicaciones similares