Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera

El propósito del presente trabajo es conocer el marco conceptual del desarrollo de los Servicios Web Semánticos y su evolución desde las dificultades de la Web actual y los servicios Web tradicionales para comprender el desarrollo de una nueva generación de lenguajes de marcado ontológico como son O...

Full description

Autores:
Valencia Calle, Alvaro
Sarmiento Soto, Carlos Mario
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2006
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
Repositorio:
Repositorio UNAB
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/26049
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/26049
Palabra clave:
Computer sciences
Systems engineer
Semantic web
Search engines
Web portals
Architecture diagram
Programming languages ​​(Electronic computers)
Electronic data processing
Document markup languages
Prototype development
Ciencias computacionales
Ingeniería de sistemas
Lenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)
Procesamiento electrónico de datos
Lenguajes de marcado
Desarrollo de prototipos
Web semántica
Motores de búsqueda
Portales web
Diagrama de arquitectura
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UNAB2_747ee783aae71f1d3664296e0847e52d
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/26049
network_acronym_str UNAB2
network_name_str Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of languages ​​for the development of semantic web services for financial information
title Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
spellingShingle Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
Computer sciences
Systems engineer
Semantic web
Search engines
Web portals
Architecture diagram
Programming languages ​​(Electronic computers)
Electronic data processing
Document markup languages
Prototype development
Ciencias computacionales
Ingeniería de sistemas
Lenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)
Procesamiento electrónico de datos
Lenguajes de marcado
Desarrollo de prototipos
Web semántica
Motores de búsqueda
Portales web
Diagrama de arquitectura
title_short Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
title_full Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
title_fullStr Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
title_full_unstemmed Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
title_sort Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financiera
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Valencia Calle, Alvaro
Sarmiento Soto, Carlos Mario
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Carrillo, Eduardo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Valencia Calle, Alvaro
Sarmiento Soto, Carlos Mario
dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv Valencia Calle, Álvaro [0000148833]
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Computer sciences
Systems engineer
Semantic web
Search engines
Web portals
Architecture diagram
Programming languages ​​(Electronic computers)
Electronic data processing
Document markup languages
Prototype development
topic Computer sciences
Systems engineer
Semantic web
Search engines
Web portals
Architecture diagram
Programming languages ​​(Electronic computers)
Electronic data processing
Document markup languages
Prototype development
Ciencias computacionales
Ingeniería de sistemas
Lenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)
Procesamiento electrónico de datos
Lenguajes de marcado
Desarrollo de prototipos
Web semántica
Motores de búsqueda
Portales web
Diagrama de arquitectura
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Ciencias computacionales
Ingeniería de sistemas
Lenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)
Procesamiento electrónico de datos
Lenguajes de marcado
Desarrollo de prototipos
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Web semántica
Motores de búsqueda
Portales web
Diagrama de arquitectura
description El propósito del presente trabajo es conocer el marco conceptual del desarrollo de los Servicios Web Semánticos y su evolución desde las dificultades de la Web actual y los servicios Web tradicionales para comprender el desarrollo de una nueva generación de lenguajes de marcado ontológico como son OWL-S, WSMO y METEOR-S. Comentaremos los elementos conceptuales de cada una de estas iniciativas y la forma en que superan las limitaciones de los servicios Web para convertirse en soluciones integrales y ser vistos como la siguiente generación de Internet. Se aplicó un modelo experimental a través del desarrollo de dos prototipos enmarcados en ámbito financiero colombiano, el primero utilizando servicios Web convencionales y, el segundo utilizando servicios Web semánticos específicamente la descripción WSMO.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08-15T20:28:20Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08-15T20:28:20Z
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Tesis
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/26049
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/26049
identifier_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB
repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Aggarwal R., Sivashanmugam K., Rajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. ”WSDL-S: A Proposal to W3C WSDL 2.0 Commite.”LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/Projects/METEOR-S/
Aguado G., Bateman J., Bañón A., Bernardos S., Fernández M., Gómez-Pérez A., Nieto E., Olalla A., Plaza R. y Sánchez A. “ONTOGENERATION: Reusing Domain andLinguistic Ontologies for Spanish”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs.mEuropean Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’98). Págs. 1-10. Brighton. Reino Unido. 1998.
Akkiraju R, Goodwin R, Doshi R, and Roeder S. A Method for Semantically Enhancing the Service Discovery Capabilities of UDDI.In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, IJCAI 2003, Aug 9-10, 2003.
Alesso, H. P., Smith, C.F. (2004). “Developing Semantic Web Services”. Wellesey MA, Ed. Sales and Customer Services Office.
Arpírez J., Gómez-Pérez A., Lozano Tello A. and Pinto S. “Reference Ontology and (Onto)2Agent: The Ontology Yellow Pages”, Knowledge and Information Systems, An International Journal, Springer-Verlag, 2(2000) 4, 387-412. Mar. 2000.
Arpírez J., Corcho O., Ferández-López M. y Gómez-Pérez A. “WebODE: a Workbench for Ontological Engineering”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCAP’01). Victoria B.C. Canada. 2001.
The AlertSite Website. http://www.alertsite.com.
Bateman J., Kasper T., Moore J. y Whitney R. “A General Organization of Knowledge form Natural Language Processing: The Penman Upper Model”. Technical Report, USC/ISI. Marina del Rey, CA (USA), 1990.
Bateman J. “KPML: The KOMET-Penman (Multilingual) Development Environment”. Technical Report, GMD/IPSI. Darmstadt. Germany. 1994.
Bateman J.A., Magnini B. y Fabris G. “The Generalized Upper Model Knowledge Base: Organization and Use”. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. IOS Press. Págs. 60-72. 1995.
Bechhofer S. “OilEd University of Manchester”. Presentación en OntoWeb Workshop. Universal Ontology Editor Workshop. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. The Netherlands.Febrero. 2001.
Benatallah B, Hacid M, Leger A, Rey C, and Toumani F. On automating web services discovery. The VLDB Journal, 14(1):84{96, 2005.
Benjamins R., Decker S., Fensel D., Motta E., Plaza E., Schreiber G., Studer R. Y Wielinga B. “IBROW3 An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component Reuse on the World-Wide Web”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs. (ECAI’98). Págs. 25-30. Brigthton, Reino Unido. 1998.
Berners-Lee T., Hendler J. y Lassila O. “The Semantic Web”. Scientific American. vol. no.5. Págs 34-43. Mayo, 2001.
Bilgin A.and Singh M. A DAML-based repository for QoS-aware semantic web service selection. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the 151 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 368, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
Borst P., Benjamins J., Wielinga B. y Akkermans H. “An Application of Ontology Construction”. Workshop on Ontological Engineering. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96). Págs. 5-16. Budapest. 1996.
Borst W. “Construction of Engieneering Ontologies”. Tesis Doctoral. University of Twente. Enschede. 1997.
Brickley D. Y Guha R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Schema Specification”. W3C Proposed Recommendations. Marzo, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfschema).
Burnstein, M., Bussler, C., Finn, T., Huhns, M., Paolucci, M., A semantic Web Services Arquitecture. Internet Computing, IEEE Volume 9, Sep-Oct 2005.
Cardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic Web Service and Web Process Composition”: Springer-Verlag New York, LLC, 2001
Cardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic e- Workflow Composition” Journal of Intelligent Inormation Systems (JIIS). .21(3) 191- 225 (2003).
Chen Z., Liang-Tien C., Silverajan B., and Bu-Sung L.. UX - an architecture providing QoS-aware and federated support for UDDI. In ICWS '03:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'03), 2003.
Christensen E., Curbera F., Meredith G., Weerawarana S., “WEB SERVICES DESCRIPTION LANGUAJE (WSDL) 1.1” World Wide Web Consortium - W3C. 2001.http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315/.
Coalition W.N. “Workflow Management Coalition”. 1999. (http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/mainframe.htm).
Universitat de Valencia, Instituto de Robótica “CONCEPTO DE SERVICIO WEB SEMANTICOS (SWS)” http://robotica.uv.es/tesis/javi/info.html.
Davies J., Fensel D. and Harmelen F. "Towards the Semantic Web". Ed. Wiley. 2002.
Day J.and Deters R. Selecting the best web service. In Proceedings of the IBM Centers for Advanced Study Conference (CASCON '04), pages 293-308, 2004.
The Dot-Comm Monitor Website. http://www.dotcom-monitor.com/.
Dean M., Connolly D., van Harmelen F., Hendler J., Horrocks I., McGuinness D., Patel-Schneider P. and Stein L. “OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference”. W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002.
Dobson G.. Quality of Service in Service-Oriented Architectures. http://digs.sourceforge.net/papers/qos.html, 2004.
Domínguez J. “Tadzebao and WebOnto: Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web”. Proceedings of te 11th Knowledge Adquisition Workshop. (KAW’98) Editado por B. Gaines and M. Musen. Banff, Canada. Abril, 1998.
Emekci F., Sahin O., Agrawal D., and Abbadi A... A peer-to-peer framework for web service discovery with ranking. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 192, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
Farquhar A., Fikes R. Y Rice J. “The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction”. Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledgebased Systems Workshop, vol. 19, págs. 1-44. Banff. Alberta. Canada. 1996.
Fensel D. “Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce”. ISBN: 3-540-41602-1. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. 2001.
Fensel D., Decker S., Erdman M. y Studer R. “Ontobroker: The Very High Idea”. Proceedings of the 11th International Flairs Conference (FLAIRS’98). Sanibal Island. Florida. Mayo, 1998.
Ferier C., Domingue J., “D3.1 V0.1 WSMO PRIMER – WSMO Final Draft” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2005). http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d3/d3.1/v0.1/200504/.
Fernández López M. “Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto,1999.
Gannod, G., Brodir, R., Timm, J. An iteractive Approach for specifying OWL-S Grounding. Computer Society, IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference, 2005.
Genesereth M. y Fikes R. “Knowledge Interchange Format, version 3.0, Reference Manual”. Technical Report. Logic-92-86. Computer Science Department. Stanford University. California. USA. 1992.
Gibrán, H. Manejo de Ontologías en sistemas multiagentes por medio de agente de ontologías aplicado a jitik. Tesis de Maestría, ITESM, Campus Monterrey, Mayo 2003
Gómez-Pérez A. y Benjamins R. “Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods”. AI Magazine vol.20, no.1. Págs. 119-122. 1999.
Gruber, T.R. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification”. Knowledge Acquisition. vol. 5: 199-220, 1993.
Gruber, T. y Olsen R. “An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics”. Technical Report KSL-94-18. Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Stanford University. California. USA. 1994.
Gruninger M. y Fox M. “Methodology for the Desing and Evaluation of Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada.1995.
Heflin J., Hendler J. y Luke S. “Applying Ontology on the Web: A Case Study”. Workshop Putting Intelligence in the Web. 5th International Work-Conference on Artificial and Natural Neural Networks (IWANN’99). Págs. 715-724. Alicante. España. 1999.
Horroks I., Fensel D., Harmelen F., Decker S., Erdmann M. y Klein M. “OIL in a Nutshell”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies an PSMs. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00). Págs. 73-77. Berlin. Germany. Agosto, 2000.
Horroks I. y van Harmelen F. “Reference Description of DAML+OIL Ontology Markup Language”. Draft Report. 2001.
Karp R., Chaundhri V. Y Thomere J. “XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language”. Technical Report. Artificial Intelligence Center. SRI International. Agosto, 1999.
Kifer M., Lausen G. y Wu J. “Logical Foundations of Object-Oriented and Frame-Based Languages”. Journal of the ACM, vol.42, nº.4. Págs. 741-843. Julio, 1995.
Kogut P., Holmes W. “AeroDAML: Applying Information Extraction to Generate DAML Annotations from Web Pages”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001) Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation, Victoria, B.C. October 21, 2001.
Lassila O. Y Swick R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Model and Syntax Specification”. W3C Recommendations. Enero, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfsyntax).
Lenat D. Y Guha R.V. “Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project”. Ed: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. California. USA. 1990.
Lozano A. “Métrica de Idoneidad de Ontologías”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Extremadura. Febrero, 2002.
Luke S. Y Heflin J. “SHOE 1.01. Proposed Specification”. SHOE Project. Febrero 2000. (http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/spec1.01.htm).
METEOR-S http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/METEOR-S
McGregor R. “Inside the LOOM classifier”. SIGART bulletin #2(3). Págs. 70-76. Junio, 1991.
Miller G. “WORDNET: an Online Lexical Database”. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4). Págs. 235-312. 1990.
Motta E. “Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling”. IOS Press. Amsterdam, 1999.
Ontologías. http://www.ontology.org/
Web-ontology language (owl). http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/
OWL Web Ontology language: Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures/
Patil A., Oundhakar S., Sheth A., Verma K. METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2004.
Preece A., Hui K. y Gray P. “KRAFT: Supporting Virtual Organizations Throught Knowledge Fusion. Architecture for Knowledge Fusion and Transformation”. Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce: Papers from the AAAI-99 Workshop. Editado por T Finin & B Grosof. AAAI Press. Págs. 33-38. 1999.
The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System Disponible en: http://protege.stanford.edu/
Rajasekaran P., Miller J., Sheth A., Verma K., Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2003.
Rajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005
Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/
Roman D., Lausen H., Keller U., “D2 v 02 Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO - Standar – WSMO Working Draft ” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group. Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2004). http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/v02/20040306/.
Roman D., Keller U., Lausen H., Brujjn J., Lara R., Stollberg M,. Polleres A., Feier C., Bussler C., Fensel D. Web Service Modeling Ontology. DERI Innsbruck, DERI Galway. 2005.
Rosner D. “Generating Multilingual Documents from a Knowledge Base: The TechDoc Project”. Technical Report, FAW Ulm. Ulm. Germany. 1994.
Schreiber A., Wielinga B. y Jansweijer W. “The KACTUS View on the ‘O’ Word”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada. 1995.
Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Adding Semantics to Web Services Standards. 1st International Conference on Web Services, Junio 2003.
Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Framework for Semantic Web Process Composition. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC), Special Issue on Semantic Web Services and their Role in Enterprise Aplication Integration and E-Commerce.Mayo 2004.
Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A., Patil A,. METEOR-S WSDI: A Scalable P2P Infraestructure of Registries for Semantic Publication and Discovery of Web Services. LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005.
Staab S. y Maedche A. “Ontology Engineering Beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations”. Proceedings of the ECAI’00. Workshop on Applications on Ontologies and PSMs. Berlin. Agosto. 2000.
Stollberg, M., Haller, A. Semantic Web Services Tutorial. Services Computing, 2005 IEEE International Conference On Volume 2
Stock O., Carenini G., Cecconi F., Franconi E., Lavelli A., Magnini B., Pianesi F., Ponzi M., Samek V.y Strapparava C. “Alfresco: Enjoying the Combinational of Natural Processing and Hypermedia for Information Exploration”. Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, c9. Editado por Mark Maybury. The MIT Press. Págs. 197-224. 1993.
Studer, R.; Benjamins, R. and Fensel, D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. DKE 25(1-2).pp:161-197. 1998.
Studer S., Benjamins R. Y Fensel D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25, 161- 197, 1998.
The Empirix Website. http://www.empirix.com.
Uschold M. y Grüninger M. “Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications”. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.2, Págs. 93-155. Junio. 1996.
Uschold M. y Jasper R. “A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto, 1999.
van Heist G., Schreiber A. y Wielinga B. “Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45. Págs. 183- 292. 1997.
W3C Semantic Web.2001 http://www.w3.org/2001/2001/sw/
Web Services Architecture W3C Working Group Note 11 February 2004.
“Web Services Choreography Interface (WSCI) 1.0 Specification” disponible en: ftp://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/wsci-spec-10.pdf
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, W3C Working Draft 3
Web Service Execution Environment Website. http://www.wsmx.org/.
Web Services Flow Language (WSFL). Disponible en: http://www- 306.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.
Apache WSIF. Disponible en: http://ws.apache.org/wsif/. Última visita noviembre 2004.
WSML homepage http://www.wsmo.org/wsml
Web Service Modeling Ontology version 1.1 http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.1/.
Web Service Modeling Ontology API for Java Website. http://wsmo4j.sourceforge.net/.
Web Service Modeling Ontology version 1.2. http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.2/20050413/.
WSMO Working Group http://www.wsmo.org/
Zaremba M., Haller A., Zaremba M., Moran M., “WSMXINFRASTRUCTURE FOR EXECUTION OF SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES” Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland ( 2004). Disponible en http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.creativecommons.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv Bogotá (Cundinamarca, Colombia)
dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv UNAB Campus Bucaramanga
dc.publisher.grantor.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad Ingeniería
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Maestría en Ciencias Computacionales
institution Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/1/bd00001261.pdf
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/2/license.txt
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/3/bd00001261.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 05bf88fa5d2ac603bbce688bf38dac8f
3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316
feb00d0fe7f4ad3d0ec16201bf29e032
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_ 1814277394385600512
spelling Carrillo, Eduardob6544ca2-ce8f-4fc8-9f5e-dab8db7092b8Valencia Calle, Alvaro332baca4-3084-4526-9855-d9c8619832ceSarmiento Soto, Carlos Marioa0c45244-1bbc-46a0-86a4-81a114779d75Valencia Calle, Álvaro [0000148833]Bogotá (Cundinamarca, Colombia)UNAB Campus Bucaramanga2024-08-15T20:28:20Z2024-08-15T20:28:20Z2006http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/26049reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.coEl propósito del presente trabajo es conocer el marco conceptual del desarrollo de los Servicios Web Semánticos y su evolución desde las dificultades de la Web actual y los servicios Web tradicionales para comprender el desarrollo de una nueva generación de lenguajes de marcado ontológico como son OWL-S, WSMO y METEOR-S. Comentaremos los elementos conceptuales de cada una de estas iniciativas y la forma en que superan las limitaciones de los servicios Web para convertirse en soluciones integrales y ser vistos como la siguiente generación de Internet. Se aplicó un modelo experimental a través del desarrollo de dos prototipos enmarcados en ámbito financiero colombiano, el primero utilizando servicios Web convencionales y, el segundo utilizando servicios Web semánticos específicamente la descripción WSMO.Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM)ÍNDICE DE FIGURAS .......................................................... iv ÍNDICE DE TABLAS ............................................................. v 1. INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS ...................................... 1 2. MARCO TEÓRICO............................................................ 7 2.1. La Web Semántica .............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Introducción. ................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2. La Web Actualmente. ................................................................................. 10 2.1.3. La Web Semántica. ................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Ontologías ................................................................................................... 12 2.1.5. Tecnologías para la web semántica. ........................................................ 18 2.1.5.1. XML .......................................................................................................... 18 2.1.5.2. RDF .......................................................................................................... 20 2.1.5.3. RDFS ....................................................................................................... 21 2.1.5.4. OIL ........................................................................................................... 22 2.1.5.5. DAML ....................................................................................................... 23 2.1.5.6. DAML+OIL................................................................................................ 24 2.1.5.7. OWL .......................................................................................................... 25 2.1.6 Evolución de la web actual a la web semántica ....................................... 29 2.2. SERVICIOS WEB .............................................................................................. 31 2.2.1. SOAP ........................................................................................................... 33 2.2.1.1 Comunicación a través de intermediarios .............................................. 36 2.2.1.2 Herramientas para la creación y manipulación de mensajes SOAP ... 37 2.2.2 WSDL ................................................................................................................ 38 2.2.3 UDDI ................................................................................................................. 42 2.2.3.1 Herramientas ............................................................................................. 45 2.3 Servicios de Web Semántica ............................................................................ 46 2.3.1 OWL-S: Marcado Semántico para Servicios Web ....................................... 50 2.3.1.1. Service Profile .......................................................................................... 52 2.3.1.2. Service Model .......................................................................................... 56 2.3.1.2.1. Process Model .................................................................................. 57 2.3.1.2.2. Control Model .................................................................................... 59 2.3.1.3. Service Grounding ............................................................................... 60 2.3.1.3.1 La relación entre OWL-S y WSDL ................................................... 60 2.3.1.3.2 Grounding de un servicio OWL-S con WSDL y SOAP .................. 63 2.3.1.3.3. La Clase DAML-S Grounding .......................................................... 64 2.3.2 LENGUAJES OWL-S .................................................................................. 65 2.4 WEB SERVICES MODELLING ONTOLOGY: WSMO .. 66 2.4.1 DESCRIPCIÓN WSMO .............................................................................. 68 2.4.2 CARACTERÍSTICAS ................................................................................... 69 2.4.3 PRINCIPIO DE DESACOPLAMIENTO .................................................... 72 2.4.4 El lenguaje WSML ....................................................................................... 75 2.5 METEOR-S (Managing End-To-End OpeRations) ...... 83 2.5.1 Anotación Semántica de Servicios Web .................................................... 84 2.5.2 Infraestructura de Descubrimiento Semántico para Servicios Web (MWSDI: METEOR-S Web Services Discovery Infraestructure) ...................... 85 2.5.2.1 Capa de Datos: ..................................................................................... 87 2.5.2.2 Capa de Especificaciones Semánticas: ............................................. 87 2.5.2.3 Capa de Comunicaciones: ................................................................... 87 2.5.2.4 Capa de Operador de Servicios: ......................................................... 88 2.5.3 Composición Semántica de Servicios Web (MWSCF: METEOR-S Web Service Composition Framework) ........................................................................ 88 2.5.3.1 Proceso Constructor ................................................................................. 89 2.5.3.1.1 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Implementación de Servicios Web .................................................................................................... 89 2.5.3.1.2 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Interface de Servicios Web ..................................................................................................................... 90 2.5.3.1.3 Especificando una actividad utilizando una Plantilla Semántica .. 90 2.5.3.2 Repositorios XML: .................................................................................... 90 2.5.3.3 Maquina de Ejecución: ............................................................................. 91 2.5.4 Características de MWSCF ....................................................................... 92 3. METODOLOGÍA ............................................................. 93 3.1 ELABORACIÓN DE PROTOTIPOS ................................................................. 95 3.1.1 Introducción: ................................................................................................. 95 3.1.2 Descripción del Servicio .............................................................................. 96 3.1.3 Especificación información Financiera reportada por los Bancos a Datacrédito ............................................................................................................. 97 3.2 CONSTRUCCIÓN PROTOTIPO SERVICIO WEB DATACREDITO ............102 3.2.1 Arquitectura de Web Services .................................................................. 103 3.2.2 Diagrama de Arquitectura ......................................................................... 104 3.2.3 DIAGRAMA DE CLASES .......................................................................... 108 3.3 CONSTRUCCIÓN PROTOTIPO SERVICIO WEB SEMANTICO WSMO ...111 3.3.1 Construcción Ontología ............................................................................ 111 3.3.2 Construcción de Goal ................................................................................ 112 3.3.3 Construcción de Capability ....................................................................... 113 3.3.4 Descubrimiento .......................................................................................... 114 3.3.4.1 Descripción de arquitectura de descubrimiento y proceso ............. 115 3.3.4.2 Adaptación de anotaciones de QoS Discovery component para utilizar las Ontologías construidas. ............................................................ 119 4. ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO OWL-S WSMO Y METEOR-S .......................................................................................... 121 4.1 Introducción: .......................................................................................................121 iii 4.2 COMPARACIÓN OWL-S y WSMO ..................................................................121 4.2.1 OWL-S Service ...............................................................................................123 4.2.2 OWL-S Service Profile ...................................................................................124 4.2.2.1 Cardinalidad Profile. ............................................................................... 125 4.2.2.2 Jerarquía Profile ..................................................................................... 125 4.2.2.3 Servicio nombre, contacto, descripción y categoría. .......................... 127 4.2.2.4 Parámetros de Profile............................................................................. 127 4.2.2.5 Descripción de la Funcionalidad ........................................................... 128 4.2.3 OWL-S Service Model ....................................................................................133 4.2.3.1 Modelo De Cardinalidad ........................................................................ 133 4.2.3.2 Descripción de la Funcionalidad .......................................................... 134 4.2.3.3 Participantes ........................................................................................... 135 4.2.3.4 Profile / Modelo de Consistencia ......................................................... 135 4.2.3.5 Procesos atómicos ................................................................................. 135 4.2.3.6 Procesos Simples ................................................................................... 136 4.2.3.7 Procesos compuestos ............................................................................ 136 4.2.4 Los OWL-S Servicio Grounding ....................................................................138 4.2.4.1 Grounding Cardinalidad ......................................................................... 138 4.2.4.2 Definición Grounding .............................................................................. 139 4.2.5 Lenguajes Lógicos ..........................................................................................140 4.2.5.1 Lenguaje de WSMO ............................................................................... 140 4.2.5.2 LENGUAJES OWL-S ............................................................................. 141 4.2.5.3 LENGUAJE UTILIZADO EN METEOR-S: ........................................... 142 4.2.6 TABLA RESUMEN DE COMPARACIÓN .....................................................144 5. CONCLUSIONES Y TRABAJO FUTURO ..................... 146 6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA ............................................................ 149 Anexo A ........................................................................... 160 Anexo B ...........................................................................162MaestríaThe purpose of this paper is to understand the conceptual framework for the development of Semantic Web Services and their evolution from the difficulties of the current Web and traditional Web services to understand the development of a new generation of ontological markup languages ​​such as OWL-S, WSMO and METEOR-S. We will discuss the conceptual elements of each of these initiatives and the way in which they overcome the limitations of Web services to become comprehensive solutions and be seen as the next generation of the Internet. An experimental model was applied through the development of two prototypes framed in the Colombian financial field, the first using conventional Web services and the second using semantic Web services, specifically the WSMO description.Modalidad Presencialhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Análisis comparativo de lenguajes para el desarrollo de servicios web semántico de información financieraComparative analysis of languages ​​for the development of semantic web services for financial informationMagíster en en Ciencias ComputacionalesUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABFacultad IngenieríaMaestría en Ciencias Computacionalesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMComputer sciencesSystems engineerSemantic webSearch enginesWeb portalsArchitecture diagramProgramming languages ​​(Electronic computers)Electronic data processingDocument markup languagesPrototype developmentCiencias computacionalesIngeniería de sistemasLenguajes de programación (Computadores electrónicos)Procesamiento electrónico de datosLenguajes de marcadoDesarrollo de prototiposWeb semánticaMotores de búsquedaPortales webDiagrama de arquitecturaAggarwal R., Sivashanmugam K., Rajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. ”WSDL-S: A Proposal to W3C WSDL 2.0 Commite.”LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/Projects/METEOR-S/Aguado G., Bateman J., Bañón A., Bernardos S., Fernández M., Gómez-Pérez A., Nieto E., Olalla A., Plaza R. y Sánchez A. “ONTOGENERATION: Reusing Domain andLinguistic Ontologies for Spanish”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs.mEuropean Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’98). Págs. 1-10. Brighton. Reino Unido. 1998.Akkiraju R, Goodwin R, Doshi R, and Roeder S. A Method for Semantically Enhancing the Service Discovery Capabilities of UDDI.In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, IJCAI 2003, Aug 9-10, 2003.Alesso, H. P., Smith, C.F. (2004). “Developing Semantic Web Services”. Wellesey MA, Ed. Sales and Customer Services Office.Arpírez J., Gómez-Pérez A., Lozano Tello A. and Pinto S. “Reference Ontology and (Onto)2Agent: The Ontology Yellow Pages”, Knowledge and Information Systems, An International Journal, Springer-Verlag, 2(2000) 4, 387-412. Mar. 2000.Arpírez J., Corcho O., Ferández-López M. y Gómez-Pérez A. “WebODE: a Workbench for Ontological Engineering”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCAP’01). Victoria B.C. Canada. 2001.The AlertSite Website. http://www.alertsite.com.Bateman J., Kasper T., Moore J. y Whitney R. “A General Organization of Knowledge form Natural Language Processing: The Penman Upper Model”. Technical Report, USC/ISI. Marina del Rey, CA (USA), 1990.Bateman J. “KPML: The KOMET-Penman (Multilingual) Development Environment”. Technical Report, GMD/IPSI. Darmstadt. Germany. 1994.Bateman J.A., Magnini B. y Fabris G. “The Generalized Upper Model Knowledge Base: Organization and Use”. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. IOS Press. Págs. 60-72. 1995.Bechhofer S. “OilEd University of Manchester”. Presentación en OntoWeb Workshop. Universal Ontology Editor Workshop. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. The Netherlands.Febrero. 2001.Benatallah B, Hacid M, Leger A, Rey C, and Toumani F. On automating web services discovery. The VLDB Journal, 14(1):84{96, 2005.Benjamins R., Decker S., Fensel D., Motta E., Plaza E., Schreiber G., Studer R. Y Wielinga B. “IBROW3 An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component Reuse on the World-Wide Web”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and PSMs. (ECAI’98). Págs. 25-30. Brigthton, Reino Unido. 1998.Berners-Lee T., Hendler J. y Lassila O. “The Semantic Web”. Scientific American. vol. no.5. Págs 34-43. Mayo, 2001.Bilgin A.and Singh M. A DAML-based repository for QoS-aware semantic web service selection. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the 151 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 368, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.Borst P., Benjamins J., Wielinga B. y Akkermans H. “An Application of Ontology Construction”. Workshop on Ontological Engineering. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96). Págs. 5-16. Budapest. 1996.Borst W. “Construction of Engieneering Ontologies”. Tesis Doctoral. University of Twente. Enschede. 1997.Brickley D. Y Guha R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Schema Specification”. W3C Proposed Recommendations. Marzo, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfschema).Burnstein, M., Bussler, C., Finn, T., Huhns, M., Paolucci, M., A semantic Web Services Arquitecture. Internet Computing, IEEE Volume 9, Sep-Oct 2005.Cardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic Web Service and Web Process Composition”: Springer-Verlag New York, LLC, 2001Cardoso, J., Sheth A. “Semantic e- Workflow Composition” Journal of Intelligent Inormation Systems (JIIS). .21(3) 191- 225 (2003).Chen Z., Liang-Tien C., Silverajan B., and Bu-Sung L.. UX - an architecture providing QoS-aware and federated support for UDDI. In ICWS '03:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'03), 2003.Christensen E., Curbera F., Meredith G., Weerawarana S., “WEB SERVICES DESCRIPTION LANGUAJE (WSDL) 1.1” World Wide Web Consortium - W3C. 2001.http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315/.Coalition W.N. “Workflow Management Coalition”. 1999. (http://www.aiim.org/wfmc/mainframe.htm).Universitat de Valencia, Instituto de Robótica “CONCEPTO DE SERVICIO WEB SEMANTICOS (SWS)” http://robotica.uv.es/tesis/javi/info.html.Davies J., Fensel D. and Harmelen F. "Towards the Semantic Web". Ed. Wiley. 2002.Day J.and Deters R. Selecting the best web service. In Proceedings of the IBM Centers for Advanced Study Conference (CASCON '04), pages 293-308, 2004.The Dot-Comm Monitor Website. http://www.dotcom-monitor.com/.Dean M., Connolly D., van Harmelen F., Hendler J., Horrocks I., McGuinness D., Patel-Schneider P. and Stein L. “OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference”. W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002.Dobson G.. Quality of Service in Service-Oriented Architectures. http://digs.sourceforge.net/papers/qos.html, 2004.Domínguez J. “Tadzebao and WebOnto: Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web”. Proceedings of te 11th Knowledge Adquisition Workshop. (KAW’98) Editado por B. Gaines and M. Musen. Banff, Canada. Abril, 1998.Emekci F., Sahin O., Agrawal D., and Abbadi A... A peer-to-peer framework for web service discovery with ranking. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 192, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.Farquhar A., Fikes R. Y Rice J. “The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction”. Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledgebased Systems Workshop, vol. 19, págs. 1-44. Banff. Alberta. Canada. 1996.Fensel D. “Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce”. ISBN: 3-540-41602-1. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. 2001.Fensel D., Decker S., Erdman M. y Studer R. “Ontobroker: The Very High Idea”. Proceedings of the 11th International Flairs Conference (FLAIRS’98). Sanibal Island. Florida. Mayo, 1998.Ferier C., Domingue J., “D3.1 V0.1 WSMO PRIMER – WSMO Final Draft” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2005). http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d3/d3.1/v0.1/200504/.Fernández López M. “Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto,1999.Gannod, G., Brodir, R., Timm, J. An iteractive Approach for specifying OWL-S Grounding. Computer Society, IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference, 2005.Genesereth M. y Fikes R. “Knowledge Interchange Format, version 3.0, Reference Manual”. Technical Report. Logic-92-86. Computer Science Department. Stanford University. California. USA. 1992.Gibrán, H. Manejo de Ontologías en sistemas multiagentes por medio de agente de ontologías aplicado a jitik. Tesis de Maestría, ITESM, Campus Monterrey, Mayo 2003Gómez-Pérez A. y Benjamins R. “Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods”. AI Magazine vol.20, no.1. Págs. 119-122. 1999.Gruber, T.R. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification”. Knowledge Acquisition. vol. 5: 199-220, 1993.Gruber, T. y Olsen R. “An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics”. Technical Report KSL-94-18. Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Stanford University. California. USA. 1994.Gruninger M. y Fox M. “Methodology for the Desing and Evaluation of Ontologies”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada.1995.Heflin J., Hendler J. y Luke S. “Applying Ontology on the Web: A Case Study”. Workshop Putting Intelligence in the Web. 5th International Work-Conference on Artificial and Natural Neural Networks (IWANN’99). Págs. 715-724. Alicante. España. 1999.Horroks I., Fensel D., Harmelen F., Decker S., Erdmann M. y Klein M. “OIL in a Nutshell”. Workshop on Applications of Ontologies an PSMs. European Conference of Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00). Págs. 73-77. Berlin. Germany. Agosto, 2000.Horroks I. y van Harmelen F. “Reference Description of DAML+OIL Ontology Markup Language”. Draft Report. 2001.Karp R., Chaundhri V. Y Thomere J. “XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language”. Technical Report. Artificial Intelligence Center. SRI International. Agosto, 1999.Kifer M., Lausen G. y Wu J. “Logical Foundations of Object-Oriented and Frame-Based Languages”. Journal of the ACM, vol.42, nº.4. Págs. 741-843. Julio, 1995.Kogut P., Holmes W. “AeroDAML: Applying Information Extraction to Generate DAML Annotations from Web Pages”. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001) Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation, Victoria, B.C. October 21, 2001.Lassila O. Y Swick R. “Resource Description Framework (RDF). Model and Syntax Specification”. W3C Recommendations. Enero, 1999. (http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdfsyntax).Lenat D. Y Guha R.V. “Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project”. Ed: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. California. USA. 1990.Lozano A. “Métrica de Idoneidad de Ontologías”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Extremadura. Febrero, 2002.Luke S. Y Heflin J. “SHOE 1.01. Proposed Specification”. SHOE Project. Febrero 2000. (http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/spec1.01.htm).METEOR-S http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/METEOR-SMcGregor R. “Inside the LOOM classifier”. SIGART bulletin #2(3). Págs. 70-76. Junio, 1991.Miller G. “WORDNET: an Online Lexical Database”. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4). Págs. 235-312. 1990.Motta E. “Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling”. IOS Press. Amsterdam, 1999.Ontologías. http://www.ontology.org/Web-ontology language (owl). http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/OWL Web Ontology language: Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures/Patil A., Oundhakar S., Sheth A., Verma K. METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2004.Preece A., Hui K. y Gray P. “KRAFT: Supporting Virtual Organizations Throught Knowledge Fusion. Architecture for Knowledge Fusion and Transformation”. Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce: Papers from the AAAI-99 Workshop. Editado por T Finin & B Grosof. AAAI Press. Págs. 33-38. 1999.The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System Disponible en: http://protege.stanford.edu/Rajasekaran P., Miller J., Sheth A., Verma K., Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition. LSDIS Lab, The University of Georgia. 2003.Rajasekaran P., Miller J., K., Verma K., Sheth A. Enhancing Web Services Description and Discovery to Facilitate Composition LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/Roman D., Lausen H., Keller U., “D2 v 02 Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO - Standar – WSMO Working Draft ” The Web Service Modeling Ontology – WSMO Working Group. Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland( 2004). http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/v02/20040306/.Roman D., Keller U., Lausen H., Brujjn J., Lara R., Stollberg M,. Polleres A., Feier C., Bussler C., Fensel D. Web Service Modeling Ontology. DERI Innsbruck, DERI Galway. 2005.Rosner D. “Generating Multilingual Documents from a Knowledge Base: The TechDoc Project”. Technical Report, FAW Ulm. Ulm. Germany. 1994.Schreiber A., Wielinga B. y Jansweijer W. “The KACTUS View on the ‘O’ Word”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’95. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal. Canada. 1995.Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Adding Semantics to Web Services Standards. 1st International Conference on Web Services, Junio 2003.Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A. Framework for Semantic Web Process Composition. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC), Special Issue on Semantic Web Services and their Role in Enterprise Aplication Integration and E-Commerce.Mayo 2004.Sivashanmugam K., Verma K., Sheth A., Patil A,. METEOR-S WSDI: A Scalable P2P Infraestructure of Registries for Semantic Publication and Discovery of Web Services. LSDIS Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia. Atenas 2005.Staab S. y Maedche A. “Ontology Engineering Beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations”. Proceedings of the ECAI’00. Workshop on Applications on Ontologies and PSMs. Berlin. Agosto. 2000.Stollberg, M., Haller, A. Semantic Web Services Tutorial. Services Computing, 2005 IEEE International Conference On Volume 2Stock O., Carenini G., Cecconi F., Franconi E., Lavelli A., Magnini B., Pianesi F., Ponzi M., Samek V.y Strapparava C. “Alfresco: Enjoying the Combinational of Natural Processing and Hypermedia for Information Exploration”. Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, c9. Editado por Mark Maybury. The MIT Press. Págs. 197-224. 1993.Studer, R.; Benjamins, R. and Fensel, D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. DKE 25(1-2).pp:161-197. 1998.Studer S., Benjamins R. Y Fensel D. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods”. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25, 161- 197, 1998.The Empirix Website. http://www.empirix.com.Uschold M. y Grüninger M. “Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications”. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.2, Págs. 93-155. Junio. 1996.Uschold M. y Jasper R. “A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications”. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99. Workshop on Ontologies and PSMs. Stockholm. Sweden. Agosto, 1999.van Heist G., Schreiber A. y Wielinga B. “Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 45. Págs. 183- 292. 1997.W3C Semantic Web.2001 http://www.w3.org/2001/2001/sw/Web Services Architecture W3C Working Group Note 11 February 2004.“Web Services Choreography Interface (WSCI) 1.0 Specification” disponible en: ftp://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/wsci-spec-10.pdfWeb Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, W3C Working Draft 3Web Service Execution Environment Website. http://www.wsmx.org/.Web Services Flow Language (WSFL). Disponible en: http://www- 306.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.Apache WSIF. Disponible en: http://ws.apache.org/wsif/. Última visita noviembre 2004.WSML homepage http://www.wsmo.org/wsmlWeb Service Modeling Ontology version 1.1 http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.1/.Web Service Modeling Ontology API for Java Website. http://wsmo4j.sourceforge.net/.Web Service Modeling Ontology version 1.2. http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.2/20050413/.WSMO Working Group http://www.wsmo.org/Zaremba M., Haller A., Zaremba M., Moran M., “WSMXINFRASTRUCTURE FOR EXECUTION OF SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES” Digital Enterprise Research Intitute, DERI, Ireland ( 2004). Disponible en http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/ORIGINALbd00001261.pdfbd00001261.pdfTesisapplication/pdf2613120https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/1/bd00001261.pdf05bf88fa5d2ac603bbce688bf38dac8fMD51open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/2/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD52open accessTHUMBNAILbd00001261.pdf.jpgbd00001261.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4825https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/26049/3/bd00001261.pdf.jpgfeb00d0fe7f4ad3d0ec16201bf29e032MD53open access20.500.12749/26049oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/260492024-08-15 22:01:09.847open accessRepositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.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

Publicaciones similares