El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas

En este artículo se presenta el marco analítico de Ingram y Schneider para estudiar el rol explicativo de las construcciones sociales de los grupos meta en el diseño de políticas públicas. Para tal !nalidad se realizó una indagación bibliográ!ca de la aplicación del marco en investigaciones empírica...

Full description

Autores:: Manosalvas, Margarita
Rave Restrepo, Juan Camilo

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB

Repositorio:: Repositorio UNAB

Idioma:: spa

id	UNAB2_6b69ffcba44f9acfb0ed7b46fe263ad5
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/27179
network_acronym_str	UNAB2
network_name_str	Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The social constructions framework for policy analysis
title	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
spellingShingle	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas Construcciones sociales Diseño de políticas públicas Análisis de políticas públicas Grupos-objetivo de política Social constructions Policy design Policy analysis Policy target groups
title_short	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
title_full	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
title_fullStr	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
title_full_unstemmed	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
title_sort	El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Manosalvas, Margarita Rave Restrepo, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Manosalvas, Margarita Rave Restrepo, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv	Manosalvas, Margarita [0000-0002-6083-6307] Rave Restrepo, Juan Camilo [0000-0003-2748-4853]
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Construcciones sociales Diseño de políticas públicas Análisis de políticas públicas Grupos-objetivo de política
topic	Construcciones sociales Diseño de políticas públicas Análisis de políticas públicas Grupos-objetivo de política Social constructions Policy design Policy analysis Policy target groups
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv	Social constructions Policy design Policy analysis Policy target groups
description	En este artículo se presenta el marco analítico de Ingram y Schneider para estudiar el rol explicativo de las construcciones sociales de los grupos meta en el diseño de políticas públicas. Para tal !nalidad se realizó una indagación bibliográ!ca de la aplicación del marco en investigaciones empíricas. Así mismo, se revisaron diversas fuentes primarias de las autoras del marco para sintetizar una versión consolidada, tanto de su estructura como de su operabilidad empírica en el análisis de políticas públicas. Del mismo modo, se dejó abierta la discusión sobre la pertinencia de conectar la categoría de interseccionalidad con la aplicación del marco analítico en investigaciones empíricas. Se concluye que el marco ha logrado notoriedad y enraizamiento, especialmente en el sector de políticas sociales en el contexto académico anglófono, por su capacidad de integrar al análisis de las políticas el papel explicativo de las percepciones, representaciones e interpretaciones de los actores en las fórmulas de distribución de bene!cios y restricciones públicas.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-04-28
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2024-10-25T13:52:09Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2024-10-25T13:52:09Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv	0124-0781 2590-8669
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27179
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4400
identifier_str_mv	0124-0781 2590-8669 instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27179 https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4400
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4400/3619
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/283
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195- 220. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024002001 Campbell, A. L. (2011). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. In How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State (Vol. 83). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2006-007 Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202 Campbell, A. L. (2020). The A#ordable Care Act and mass policy feedbacks. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(4), 567-580. https://doi. org/10.1215/03616878-8255493 Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s de!nitional dilemmas. Annual review of sociology, 41, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142 Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 DeLeon, P., & Martell, C. R. (2006). The policy sciences: past, present, and future. Handbook of public policy, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3 Donovan, M. C. (1993). Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Review of Policy Research, 12(3-4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3 Donovan, M. C. (2014). The problem with making AIDS comfortable: Federal policymaking and the rhetoric of innocence. In M C Donovan (Ed.), Activism and Marginalization in the AIDS Crisis, 139–168. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315865515-11 Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 275-296. https:// doi.org/10.2307/422246 Hogan, N. L. (1997). The social construction of target populations and the transformation of prisonbased AIDS policy: A descriptive case study. Journal of Homosexuality, 32(3–4), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v32n03_04 Husmann, M. A. (2015). Social constructions of obesity target population: an empirical look at obesity policy narratives. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 415– 442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9229-6 Hynes, B. O. D., & Hayes, N. (2011). Who bene!ts from early childcare subsidy design in Ireland? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982711X597017 Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. SUNY Press. Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (2015). 14 Making distinctions: the social construction of target populations. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, 259. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352.00022 Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social Construction and Policy Design. En. PA Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (93-126).. Boulder. Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier Publishing Company New York. Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public administration review, 32(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/974990 McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800 Mannheim, K. (2013). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002828 Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1537592704000623 Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). Social construction and policy implementation: Inmate health as a public health issue. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 240–256. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502002.x Patterson, D. A., & Keefe, R. H. (2008). Using social construction theory as a foundation for macrolevel interventions in communities impacted by HIV and addictions. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 35(2), 111–126. Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., & Peterson, H. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12040 Pierson, P. (1993). When e#ect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710 Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem de!nition: Shaping the policy agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas. Schneider, A., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? 1. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103-119. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.x Schroedel, J. R., & Jordan, D. R. (1998). Senate voting and social construction of target populations: A study of AIDS policy making, 1987-1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-23-1-107 Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). MIT press. Soss, J. (2005). Making clients and citizens: Welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, 291–328. Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049 Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the policy process. New York: Routledge. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 64-76
institution	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdf https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/2/license.txt https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	00737d355e948b03bcf58d4cf2550a74 3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316 74ef20fb4eb0de0cec714854e91b1a02
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_	1828219952447881216
spelling	Manosalvas, Margaritaf503b6af-789a-44fe-982c-2465b029518dRave Restrepo, Juan Camilodd582cb2-8fc3-4774-a3c2-89059702097fManosalvas, Margarita [0000-0002-6083-6307]Rave Restrepo, Juan Camilo [0000-0003-2748-4853]2024-10-25T13:52:09Z2024-10-25T13:52:09Z2022-04-280124-07812590-8669http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27179instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cohttps://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4400En este artículo se presenta el marco analítico de Ingram y Schneider para estudiar el rol explicativo de las construcciones sociales de los grupos meta en el diseño de políticas públicas. Para tal !nalidad se realizó una indagación bibliográ!ca de la aplicación del marco en investigaciones empíricas. Así mismo, se revisaron diversas fuentes primarias de las autoras del marco para sintetizar una versión consolidada, tanto de su estructura como de su operabilidad empírica en el análisis de políticas públicas. Del mismo modo, se dejó abierta la discusión sobre la pertinencia de conectar la categoría de interseccionalidad con la aplicación del marco analítico en investigaciones empíricas. Se concluye que el marco ha logrado notoriedad y enraizamiento, especialmente en el sector de políticas sociales en el contexto académico anglófono, por su capacidad de integrar al análisis de las políticas el papel explicativo de las percepciones, representaciones e interpretaciones de los actores en las fórmulas de distribución de bene!cios y restricciones públicas.In this article, the analytical framework of Ingram and Schneider is presented to study the explanatory role of social constructions of target groups in public policy design. For this purpose, we carry out a bibliographical inquiry of the application of the framework in empirical research. Also, we reviewed various primary sources of the authors of the framework to synthesize a consolidated version of its structure and its empirical operability in the analysis of public policies. Likewise, we leave open the discussion on the relevance of connecting the category of intersectionality with the application of the analytical framework. It is concluded that the framework has achieved notoriety and roots, especially in the social policy sector in the Anglophone academic context, due to its ability to integrate into policy analysis, the role of perceptions, representations, and interpretations of the actors in the distribution of public bene!ts and burdens.application/pdfspaUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4400/3619https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/283Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195- 220. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024002001Campbell, A. L. (2011). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. In How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State (Vol. 83). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2006-007Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202Campbell, A. L. (2020). The A#ordable Care Act and mass policy feedbacks. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(4), 567-580. https://doi. org/10.1215/03616878-8255493Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s de!nitional dilemmas. Annual review of sociology, 41, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039DeLeon, P., & Martell, C. R. (2006). The policy sciences: past, present, and future. Handbook of public policy, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3Donovan, M. C. (1993). Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Review of Policy Research, 12(3-4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3Donovan, M. C. (2014). The problem with making AIDS comfortable: Federal policymaking and the rhetoric of innocence. In M C Donovan (Ed.), Activism and Marginalization in the AIDS Crisis, 139–168. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315865515-11Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 275-296. https:// doi.org/10.2307/422246Hogan, N. L. (1997). The social construction of target populations and the transformation of prisonbased AIDS policy: A descriptive case study. Journal of Homosexuality, 32(3–4), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v32n03_04Husmann, M. A. (2015). Social constructions of obesity target population: an empirical look at obesity policy narratives. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 415– 442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9229-6Hynes, B. O. D., & Hayes, N. (2011). Who bene!ts from early childcare subsidy design in Ireland? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982711X597017Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. SUNY Press.Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (2015). 14 Making distinctions: the social construction of target populations. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, 259. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352.00022Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social Construction and Policy Design. En. PA Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (93-126).. Boulder.Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14.Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier Publishing Company New York.Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public administration review, 32(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/974990McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800Mannheim, K. (2013). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002828Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1537592704000623Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). Social construction and policy implementation: Inmate health as a public health issue. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 240–256. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502002.xPatterson, D. A., & Keefe, R. H. (2008). Using social construction theory as a foundation for macrolevel interventions in communities impacted by HIV and addictions. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 35(2), 111–126.Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., & Peterson, H. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12040Pierson, P. (1993). When e#ect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem de!nition: Shaping the policy agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Schneider, A., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? 1. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103-119. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.xSchroedel, J. R., & Jordan, D. R. (1998). Senate voting and social construction of target populations: A study of AIDS policy making, 1987-1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-23-1-107Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). MIT press.Soss, J. (2005). Making clients and citizens: Welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, 291–328.Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the policy process. New York: Routledge. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 64-76Construcciones socialesDiseño de políticas públicasAnálisis de políticas públicasGrupos-objetivo de políticaSocial constructionsPolicy designPolicy analysisPolicy target groupsEl marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicasThe social constructions framework for policy analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ORIGINALArtículo.pdfArtículo.pdfArtículoapplication/pdf449294https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdf00737d355e948b03bcf58d4cf2550a74MD51open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/2/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD52open accessTHUMBNAILArtículo.pdf.jpgArtículo.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg10228https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27179/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpg74ef20fb4eb0de0cec714854e91b1a02MD53open access20.500.12749/27179oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/271792024-10-25 22:02:21.862open accessRepositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.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

El marco analítico de la construcción social. Un enfoque crítico para analizar el diseño de las políticas públicas

Publicaciones similares