El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?

Algunos teóricos políticos republicanos españoles abogan por recuperar la !losofía de Immanuel Kant para la izquierda, rescatándolo de una apropiación indebida de la derecha y corrigiendo el abandono de Kant del progresismo. Este artículo sostiene que este proyecto se equivoca de tres maneras. Prime...

Full description

Autores:: Fitzgibbon Cella, Paul

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB

Repositorio:: Repositorio UNAB

Idioma:: spa

id	UNAB2_270779fc210a9ef8dace43cbf8b9d627
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/27181
network_acronym_str	UNAB2
network_name_str	Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Spanish Republicanism: Zurück zu Kant?
title	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
spellingShingle	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant? Kant Republicanismo español Conservadurismo Izquierda política Progresismo Kant Spanish Republicanism Conservatism Political left Progressivism
title_short	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
title_full	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
title_fullStr	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
title_full_unstemmed	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
title_sort	El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Fitzgibbon Cella, Paul
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Fitzgibbon Cella, Paul
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv	Fitzgibbon Cella, Paul [0000-0001-6761-6764]
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Kant Republicanismo español Conservadurismo Izquierda política Progresismo
topic	Kant Republicanismo español Conservadurismo Izquierda política Progresismo Kant Spanish Republicanism Conservatism Political left Progressivism
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv	Kant Spanish Republicanism Conservatism Political left Progressivism
description	Algunos teóricos políticos republicanos españoles abogan por recuperar la !losofía de Immanuel Kant para la izquierda, rescatándolo de una apropiación indebida de la derecha y corrigiendo el abandono de Kant del progresismo. Este artículo sostiene que este proyecto se equivoca de tres maneras. Primero, su implicación de que el conservadurismo reivindica a Kant es incorrecta, si intelectuales de derecha rechazan a Kant desde hace mucho. Segundo, se basa en una premisa errónea: que izquierda y derecha están en desacuerdo sobre conceptos abstractos. En realidad, el conservadurismo — una defensa ad hoc de las estructuras de poder existentes— no tiene compromisos teóricos básicos. Tercero, Kant es claramente progresista, ya que escribió en oposición a los conservadores de su tiempo. Para concluir, mantengo que este descaminado proyecto es sintomático de errores en cómo los progresistas de!nen el progresismo y el conservadurismo. Propongo repensar estas de!niciones.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-13
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2024-10-25T14:46:49Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2024-10-25T14:46:49Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv	0124-0781 2590-8669
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27181
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4276
identifier_str_mv	0124-0781 2590-8669 instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27181 https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4276
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4276/3615
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/283
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Alexander, James. (2013). “The Contradictions of Conservatism.” Government and Opposition. 48. 4. 594-615. Allais, Lucy. (2016). “Kant’s Racism.” Philosophical Papers. 45. 1-2. 1-36. Aristotle. (1984). The Athenian Constitution. Ed. P. J. Rhodes. New York: Penguin. Bertomeu, María Julia. (2019). “Kant: ¿liberal o republicano?” Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy. 10. 162-179. Blackstone, William. (1825). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Philadelphia, PA. Bourke, Richard. (2018). “What Is Conservatism? History, Ideology and Party.” European Journal of Political Theory. 17. 4. 449-475. Burke, Edmund. (2001). Re"ections on the Revolution in France. Ed. J. C. D. Clark. Stanford University Press. Cass, Oren. (2021). “A New Conservatism: Freeing the Right from Free-Market Orthodoxy.” Foreign Affairs. March/April. Cummiskey, David. (2008). “Justice and Revolution in Kant’s Political Philosophy,” in Pablo Muchnik (ed). Rethinking Kant. Vol. I. Cambridge Scholars Pub. Darder, A., et al. (2008). “Locating the Field: Performing Theories of Decolonizing Inquiry.” Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 21-30. Domènech, Antoni. (2004). El eclipse de la fraternidad: Una revisión republicana de la tradición socialista. Barcelona: Crítica. Fernández Liria, Carlos and Luis Alegre Zahonero. (2014). El orden de ‘El Capital’: ¿Por qué seguir leyendo a Marx? Madrid: Akal. Gentz, Friedrich. (1967). “Nachtrag zu dem Räsonnement des Herrn. Professor Kant über das Verhältnis zwischen Theorie und Praxis.” In Dieter Henrich (ed.) Kant, Gentz, Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 89-112. Gregory, Michael L., and A. W. Rehberg. (2020). “On the relationship between theory and practice.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 1-11. Hampsher-Monk, Iain. (2005). The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke. London: Longman. 1987. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. (2005). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin. Hayek, Friedrich A. (2011). “The Constitution of Liberty.” In Ronald Hamowy (ed.) The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. v. 17. Oxon (England): Routledge. Hazony, Yoram. (2019). “Conservative Democracy: Liberal Principles Have Brought Us to a Dead End.” First Things. https://www.!rstthings.com/article/ 2019/01/conservative-democracy. Accessed on Dec. 1, 2020. Hume, David. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. Selby-Bigge and Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kant, Immanuel. (1900). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Reimer: Hrsg. von der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Kant, Immanuel. (1991). Political Writings. Ed. H. S. Reiss. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press. Kedourie, Elie. (1984). “Conservatism and the Conservative Party,” in Elie Kedourie. The Crossman Confessions and Other Essays, London: Mansell. 37-46. Lampedusa, Giuseppe Tomasi di. (1963). The Leopard. Trans. Archibald Colquhoun, London: Fontana. Lee, Fred. (2013). “Reconsidering the Je!erson–Hemings Relationship: Nationalist Historiography without Nationalist Heroes, Racial Sexuality without Racial Signi"cance.” Political Research Quarterly. 66.3. 500-515. Marwah, Inder S. (2013). “What Nature Makes of Her: Kant’s Gendered Metaphysics.” Hypatia. 28. 3. 551-567. Michels, Robert. (1945). “Conservatism.” In E. R. A. Seligman and A. Johnson (eds.) Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 15 vols., III. New York: Macmillan. Michels, Robert. (1968). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: The Free Press. Möser, Justus. (1798). “Über die Erblichkeit des Herrenstandes bei gewissen Familien in einem monarchischen Staate.” Berlinische Blatter. 116-125. Muller, Jerry Z. (1990). “Justus Möser and the Conservative Critique of Early Modern Capitalism.” Central European History. 23. 2/3. 153-178. Muller, Jerry Z. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press. Nash, George H. (1996). The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945. Wilmington, Del.: Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Neculau, Radu. (2008). “Does Kant’s Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the Rechtslehre.” Kantian Review, 13. 2. 107-140 Nietzsche, Friedrich. (2006). On the Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Carol Diethe. Cambridge University Press. Nozick, Robert. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. Oakeshott, Michael. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen. Ramsden, John. (1999). An Appetite for Power: A History of the Conservative Party since 1830. New York: Harper Collins. Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1967). “Über das Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis.” In Dieter Henrich (ed.) Kant, Gentz, Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 113-130. Robin, Corey. (2011). The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. Oxford University Press. Rothbard, Murray. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press. Schmitt, Carl. (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, Trans. G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos. Scruton, Roger. (1980). The Meaning of Conservatism. London: Macmillan. Singh, Nikhil Pal. (2009). “Rethinking Race and Nation.” In Janice A. Radway, Kevin K. Gaines, Barry Shank, and Penny von Eschen (eds.) American Studies: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 9-16. Thucydides. (1960). The Peloponnesian War. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. New York: Bantam Books. Thucydides. (1978). The History of the Peloponnesian War. Trans. Richard Crawley. In Great Books of the Western World. Ed. Robert Maynard Hutchins. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. @TuckerCarlson. (2018). “Je! Bezos is the richest man in the world. Many of his employees are so poor, you’re paying their welfare bene"ts. And he’s not the only tech billionaire o$oading his payroll costs onto taxpayers. This is an indefensible scam. Why is only Bernie talking about it?” Twitter, 30 Aug. 2018, 8:10 p. m., https://twitter. com/TuckerCarlson/status/1035334044698009600. Villacañas, José Luis. (2009). “Lo común en Kant.” Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica. 42. 89-104. Wayne, Mike. (2015). “The Return to Kant.” Los Angeles Review of Books. September 19, 2015. https:// lareviewo"ooks.org/article/the-return-to-kant/. Xenophon. Hellenica. (1918). Trans. Carleton Brownson. London: William Heinemann.
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 93-104
institution	Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdf https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/2/license.txt https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	d4607045aac40ca5ad765dfa5ee343e4 3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316 e53308edcdea015e5e5c5f6ce79ce9db
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_	1814277385428664320
spelling	Fitzgibbon Cella, Paul24be61a3-d3a4-4a76-bda9-a0afe05351aaFitzgibbon Cella, Paul [0000-0001-6761-6764]2024-10-25T14:46:49Z2024-10-25T14:46:49Z2022-03-130124-07812590-8669http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27181instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cohttps://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4276Algunos teóricos políticos republicanos españoles abogan por recuperar la !losofía de Immanuel Kant para la izquierda, rescatándolo de una apropiación indebida de la derecha y corrigiendo el abandono de Kant del progresismo. Este artículo sostiene que este proyecto se equivoca de tres maneras. Primero, su implicación de que el conservadurismo reivindica a Kant es incorrecta, si intelectuales de derecha rechazan a Kant desde hace mucho. Segundo, se basa en una premisa errónea: que izquierda y derecha están en desacuerdo sobre conceptos abstractos. En realidad, el conservadurismo — una defensa ad hoc de las estructuras de poder existentes— no tiene compromisos teóricos básicos. Tercero, Kant es claramente progresista, ya que escribió en oposición a los conservadores de su tiempo. Para concluir, mantengo que este descaminado proyecto es sintomático de errores en cómo los progresistas de!nen el progresismo y el conservadurismo. Propongo repensar estas de!niciones.Some Spanish republican theorists argue for recovering Immanuel Kant’s philosophy for the left, rescuing him from his unwarranted appropriation by the right and correcting his neglect by progressivism. This article argues that this project is misguided in three ways. First, the implication that conservatism has claimed Kant for its camp is simply wrong, given that intellectuals on the right have long explicitly rejected him. Second, it rests on a faulty premise: that the left and right disagree about abstract concepts. Rather, conservatism represents an ad hoc defense of existing power structures without any !rm theoretical commitments. Third, Kant is clearly progressive, as he wrote against conservative contemporaries. To conclude, I claim that the progressives’ ill-founded attempt to recover Kant is symptomatic of a broader misunderstanding in how progressives de!ne progressivism and conservatism. I propose rethinking these de!nitions.application/pdfspaUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4276/3615https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/283Alexander, James. (2013). “The Contradictions of Conservatism.” Government and Opposition. 48. 4. 594-615.Allais, Lucy. (2016). “Kant’s Racism.” Philosophical Papers. 45. 1-2. 1-36.Aristotle. (1984). The Athenian Constitution. Ed. P. J. Rhodes. New York: Penguin.Bertomeu, María Julia. (2019). “Kant: ¿liberal o republicano?” Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy. 10. 162-179.Blackstone, William. (1825). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Philadelphia, PA.Bourke, Richard. (2018). “What Is Conservatism? History, Ideology and Party.” European Journal of Political Theory. 17. 4. 449-475.Burke, Edmund. (2001). Re"ections on the Revolution in France. Ed. J. C. D. Clark. Stanford University Press.Cass, Oren. (2021). “A New Conservatism: Freeing the Right from Free-Market Orthodoxy.” Foreign Affairs. March/April.Cummiskey, David. (2008). “Justice and Revolution in Kant’s Political Philosophy,” in Pablo Muchnik (ed). Rethinking Kant. Vol. I. Cambridge Scholars Pub.Darder, A., et al. (2008). “Locating the Field: Performing Theories of Decolonizing Inquiry.” Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 21-30.Domènech, Antoni. (2004). El eclipse de la fraternidad: Una revisión republicana de la tradición socialista. Barcelona: Crítica.Fernández Liria, Carlos and Luis Alegre Zahonero. (2014). El orden de ‘El Capital’: ¿Por qué seguir leyendo a Marx? Madrid: Akal.Gentz, Friedrich. (1967). “Nachtrag zu dem Räsonnement des Herrn. Professor Kant über das Verhältnis zwischen Theorie und Praxis.” In Dieter Henrich (ed.) Kant, Gentz, Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 89-112.Gregory, Michael L., and A. W. Rehberg. (2020). “On the relationship between theory and practice.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 1-11.Hampsher-Monk, Iain. (2005). The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke. London: Longman. 1987.Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. (2005). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.Hayek, Friedrich A. (2011). “The Constitution of Liberty.” In Ronald Hamowy (ed.) The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. v. 17. Oxon (England): Routledge.Hazony, Yoram. (2019). “Conservative Democracy: Liberal Principles Have Brought Us to a Dead End.” First Things. https://www.!rstthings.com/article/ 2019/01/conservative-democracy. Accessed on Dec. 1, 2020.Hume, David. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. Selby-Bigge and Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Kant, Immanuel. (1900). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Reimer: Hrsg. von der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Kant, Immanuel. (1991). Political Writings. Ed. H. S. Reiss. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press.Kedourie, Elie. (1984). “Conservatism and the Conservative Party,” in Elie Kedourie. The Crossman Confessions and Other Essays, London: Mansell. 37-46.Lampedusa, Giuseppe Tomasi di. (1963). The Leopard. Trans. Archibald Colquhoun, London: Fontana.Lee, Fred. (2013). “Reconsidering the Je!erson–Hemings Relationship: Nationalist Historiography without Nationalist Heroes, Racial Sexuality without Racial Signi"cance.” Political Research Quarterly. 66.3. 500-515.Marwah, Inder S. (2013). “What Nature Makes of Her: Kant’s Gendered Metaphysics.” Hypatia. 28. 3. 551-567.Michels, Robert. (1945). “Conservatism.” In E. R. A. Seligman and A. Johnson (eds.) Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 15 vols., III. New York: Macmillan.Michels, Robert. (1968). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: The Free Press.Möser, Justus. (1798). “Über die Erblichkeit des Herrenstandes bei gewissen Familien in einem monarchischen Staate.” Berlinische Blatter. 116-125.Muller, Jerry Z. (1990). “Justus Möser and the Conservative Critique of Early Modern Capitalism.” Central European History. 23. 2/3. 153-178.Muller, Jerry Z. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press.Nash, George H. (1996). The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945. Wilmington, Del.: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.Neculau, Radu. (2008). “Does Kant’s Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the Rechtslehre.” Kantian Review, 13. 2. 107-140Nietzsche, Friedrich. (2006). On the Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Carol Diethe. Cambridge University Press.Nozick, Robert. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Oakeshott, Michael. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.Ramsden, John. (1999). An Appetite for Power: A History of the Conservative Party since 1830. New York: Harper Collins.Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1967). “Über das Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis.” In Dieter Henrich (ed.) Kant, Gentz, Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 113-130.Robin, Corey. (2011). The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. Oxford University Press.Rothbard, Murray. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press.Schmitt, Carl. (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, Trans. G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos.Scruton, Roger. (1980). The Meaning of Conservatism. London: Macmillan.Singh, Nikhil Pal. (2009). “Rethinking Race and Nation.” In Janice A. Radway, Kevin K. Gaines, Barry Shank, and Penny von Eschen (eds.) American Studies: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing Inc. 9-16.Thucydides. (1960). The Peloponnesian War. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. New York: Bantam Books.Thucydides. (1978). The History of the Peloponnesian War. Trans. Richard Crawley. In Great Books of the Western World. Ed. Robert Maynard Hutchins. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.@TuckerCarlson. (2018). “Je! Bezos is the richest man in the world. Many of his employees are so poor, you’re paying their welfare bene"ts. And he’s not the only tech billionaire o$oading his payroll costs onto taxpayers. This is an indefensible scam. Why is only Bernie talking about it?” Twitter, 30 Aug. 2018, 8:10 p. m., https://twitter. com/TuckerCarlson/status/1035334044698009600.Villacañas, José Luis. (2009). “Lo común en Kant.” Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica. 42. 89-104.Wayne, Mike. (2015). “The Return to Kant.” Los Angeles Review of Books. September 19, 2015. https:// lareviewo"ooks.org/article/the-return-to-kant/.Xenophon. Hellenica. (1918). Trans. Carleton Brownson. London: William Heinemann.Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 93-104KantRepublicanismo españolConservadurismoIzquierda políticaProgresismoKantSpanish RepublicanismConservatismPolitical leftProgressivismEl republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?Spanish Republicanism: Zurück zu Kant?info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ORIGINALArtículo.pdfArtículo.pdfArtículoapplication/pdf310472https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdfd4607045aac40ca5ad765dfa5ee343e4MD51open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/2/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD52open accessTHUMBNAILArtículo.pdf.jpgArtículo.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9708https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27181/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpge53308edcdea015e5e5c5f6ce79ce9dbMD53open access20.500.12749/27181oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/271812024-10-25 22:01:11.547open accessRepositorio Institucional \| Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.coRUwoTE9TKSBBVVRPUihFUyksIG1hbmlmaWVzdGEobWFuaWZlc3RhbW9zKSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBvYmpldG8gZGUgbGEgcHJlc2VudGUgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBlcyBvcmlnaW5hbCB5IGxhIHJlYWxpesOzIHNpbiB2aW9sYXIgbyB1c3VycGFyIGRlcmVjaG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yIGRlIHRlcmNlcm9zLCBwb3IgbG8gdGFudG8sIGxhIG9icmEgZXMgZGUgZXhjbHVzaXZhIGF1dG9yw61hIHkgdGllbmUgbGEgdGl0dWxhcmlkYWQgc29icmUgbGEgbWlzbWEuCgpFbiBjYXNvIGRlIHByZXNlbnRhcnNlIGN1YWxxdWllciByZWNsYW1hY2nDs24gbyBhY2Npw7NuIHBvciBwYXJ0ZSBkZSB1biB0ZXJjZXJvIGVuIGN1YW50byBhIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciBzb2JyZSBsYSBvYnJhIGVuIGN1ZXN0acOzbi4gRWwgQVVUT1IgYXN1bWlyw6EgdG9kYSBsYSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWQsIHkgc2FsZHLDoSBlbiBkZWZlbnNhIGRlIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBhcXXDrSBhdXRvcml6YWRvcywgcGFyYSB0b2RvcyBsb3MgZWZlY3RvcyBsYSBVTkFCIGFjdMO6YSBjb21vIHVuIHRlcmNlcm8gZGUgYnVlbmEgZmUuCgpFbCBBVVRPUiBhdXRvcml6YSBhIGxhIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkIEF1dMOzbm9tYSBkZSBCdWNhcmFtYW5nYSBwYXJhIHF1ZSBlbiBsb3MgdMOpcm1pbm9zIGVzdGFibGVjaWRvcyBlbiBsYSBMZXkgMjMgZGUgMTk4MiwgTGV5IDQ0IGRlIDE5OTMsIERlY2lzacOzbiBBbmRpbmEgMzUxIGRlIDE5OTMgeSBkZW3DoXMgbm9ybWFzIGdlbmVyYWxlcyBzb2JyZSBsYSBtYXRlcmlhLCB1dGlsaWNlIGxhIG9icmEgb2JqZXRvIGRlIGxhIHByZXNlbnRlIGF1dG9yaXphY2nDs24uCg==

El republicanismo español: ¿Zurück zu Kant?

Publicaciones similares