The legal argumentation viewed from disagreements in law
Being the legal reasoning inherit from theories of judicial decision and therefore from legal theory, it comes as fields of action the analysis of how the problems of post positivist legal theory affect the moments of justification of judicial decision. In this way it’s postulated for the present: T...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Industrial de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UIS
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10836
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/8582
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10836
- Palabra clave:
- criterios de validez
argumentación jurídica
aplicabilidad
justificación de las decisiones judiciales
tribunal constitucional
criteria for validity
legal reasoning
applicability
justification of judicial decisions
constitutional court
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
| Summary: | Being the legal reasoning inherit from theories of judicial decision and therefore from legal theory, it comes as fields of action the analysis of how the problems of post positivist legal theory affect the moments of justification of judicial decision. In this way it’s postulated for the present: The relation legal reasoning –theory of law, the binomial validity– applicability of legal norms, the moments of justification of judicial decision and the ways in which the legal reasoning related with disagreements between lawyers. |
|---|