Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with thos...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Universidad Industrial de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UIS
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10933
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933
- Palabra clave:
- Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
denialism
post-truth
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
negacionismo
posverdad
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
id |
UISANTADR2_d5e81bcd4d4dcc2bd6fde37161ec0083 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10933 |
network_acronym_str |
UISANTADR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UIS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2022-01-032022-06-07T15:41:28Z2022-06-07T15:41:28Zhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/1196710.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with those philosophies (mostly continental) that are unscientific or that have not promoted the study of science. In this way, the reasons why Bunge rejects Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger are analyzed. This rejection leads to an investigation of the bases of denialism and post-truth and, finally, a balance is made between Bunge's position and the flourishing of disinformation today.el filósofo Mario Bunge ha sido el más notable investigador de la epistemología en nuestros días. Su preferencia por la ciencia y su rechazo hacia la pseudociencia son evidentes. Así, se reconoce que la filosofía de Bunge fue analítica. En consecuencia, Bunge también manifestó su desacuerdo con aquellas filosofías (en su mayoría continentales) que son anticientíficas o que no hayan promovido el estudio de la ciencia. De este modo, se analizan las razones por las que Bunge rechazó a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger. Este rechazo lleva a investigar las bases del negacionismo y la posverdad y, finalmente, se realiza un balance entre la postura de Bunge y el florecimiento de la desinformación en la actualidad.application/pdftext/htmltext/xmlspaUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/6https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/24https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/25Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 21 n. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-1012145-85291692-2484BungeHegelHusserlHeideggerdenialismpost-truthBungeHegelHusserlHeideggernegacionismoposverdadBunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to DenialismEl rechazo de Bunge a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger y su relación con el negacionismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Mora Ramirez, Rafael Félix20.500.14071/10933oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/109332022-06-07 10:41:28.91metadata.onlyhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co |
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
El rechazo de Bunge a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger y su relación con el negacionismo |
title |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
spellingShingle |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger denialism post-truth Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger negacionismo posverdad |
title_short |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
title_full |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
title_fullStr |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
title_sort |
Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger denialism post-truth |
topic |
Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger denialism post-truth Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger negacionismo posverdad |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Bunge Hegel Husserl Heidegger negacionismo posverdad |
description |
the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with those philosophies (mostly continental) that are unscientific or that have not promoted the study of science. In this way, the reasons why Bunge rejects Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger are analyzed. This rejection leads to an investigation of the bases of denialism and post-truth and, finally, a balance is made between Bunge's position and the flourishing of disinformation today. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-07T15:41:28Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-07T15:41:28Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967 10.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933 |
url |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967 https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/6 https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/24 https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/25 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UIS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UIS http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Industrial de Santander |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101 |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101 |
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 21 n. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2145-8529 1692-2484 |
institution |
Universidad Industrial de Santander |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
DSpace at UIS |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noesis@uis.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814095211831230464 |