Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism

the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with thos...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Repositorio:
Repositorio UIS
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10933
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933
Palabra clave:
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
denialism
post-truth
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
negacionismo
posverdad
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
id UISANTADR2_d5e81bcd4d4dcc2bd6fde37161ec0083
oai_identifier_str oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10933
network_acronym_str UISANTADR2
network_name_str Repositorio UIS
repository_id_str
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2022-01-032022-06-07T15:41:28Z2022-06-07T15:41:28Zhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/1196710.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with those philosophies (mostly continental) that are unscientific or that have not promoted the study of science. In this way, the reasons why Bunge rejects Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger are analyzed. This rejection leads to an investigation of the bases of denialism and post-truth and, finally, a balance is made between Bunge's position and the flourishing of disinformation today.el filósofo Mario Bunge ha sido el más notable investigador de la epistemología en nuestros días. Su preferencia por la ciencia y su rechazo hacia la pseudociencia son evidentes. Así, se reconoce que la filosofía de Bunge fue analítica. En consecuencia, Bunge también manifestó su desacuerdo con aquellas filosofías (en su mayoría continentales) que son anticientíficas o que no hayan promovido el estudio de la ciencia. De este modo, se analizan las razones por las que Bunge rechazó a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger. Este rechazo lleva a investigar las bases del negacionismo y la posverdad y, finalmente, se realiza un balance entre la postura de Bunge y el florecimiento de la desinformación en la actualidad.application/pdftext/htmltext/xmlspaUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/6https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/24https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/25Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 21 n. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-1012145-85291692-2484BungeHegelHusserlHeideggerdenialismpost-truthBungeHegelHusserlHeideggernegacionismoposverdadBunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to DenialismEl rechazo de Bunge a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger y su relación con el negacionismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Mora Ramirez, Rafael Félix20.500.14071/10933oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/109332022-06-07 10:41:28.91metadata.onlyhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv El rechazo de Bunge a Hegel, Husserl y Heidegger y su relación con el negacionismo
title Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
spellingShingle Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
denialism
post-truth
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
negacionismo
posverdad
title_short Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
title_full Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
title_fullStr Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
title_full_unstemmed Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
title_sort Bunge's Rejection of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger and its Relation to Denialism
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
denialism
post-truth
topic Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
denialism
post-truth
Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
negacionismo
posverdad
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Bunge
Hegel
Husserl
Heidegger
negacionismo
posverdad
description the philosopher Mario Bunge has been the most notable researcher of epistemology in our day. His preference for science and his rejection of pseudoscience are evident. Thus, it is recognized that Bunge's philosophy is analytical. Consequently, Bunge has also expressed his disagreement with those philosophies (mostly continental) that are unscientific or that have not promoted the study of science. In this way, the reasons why Bunge rejects Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger are analyzed. This rejection leads to an investigation of the bases of denialism and post-truth and, finally, a balance is made between Bunge's position and the flourishing of disinformation today.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-07T15:41:28Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-07T15:41:28Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967
10.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933
url https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10933
identifier_str_mv 10.18273/revfil.v21n1-2022005
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/6
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/24
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11967/25
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UIS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Filosofía UIS
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 21 n. 1 (2022): Revista Filosofía UIS; 83-101
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2145-8529
1692-2484
institution Universidad Industrial de Santander
repository.name.fl_str_mv DSpace at UIS
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noesis@uis.edu.co
_version_ 1814095211831230464