Regla de Reconocimiento y contenidos mínimos de derecho natural en Hart: en pos de una articulación
In this article I propose a connection between Hart’s rule of reconigtion and the thesis of minimum contents of natural law of the same author. The recognition rule is understood as a conventional rule constituted by the practice of judicial officials in charge of applying validity criteria to deter...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Industrial de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UIS
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10919
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/11329
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10919
- Palabra clave:
- regla convencional
validez
norma jurídica
mínimos jurídicos
convención constitutiva
autoridad legítima
conventional rule
validity
legal norm
legal minimums
constitutive convention
legitimate authority
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
| Summary: | In this article I propose a connection between Hart’s rule of reconigtion and the thesis of minimum contents of natural law of the same author. The recognition rule is understood as a conventional rule constituted by the practice of judicial officials in charge of applying validity criteria to determine whether particular norms belong to the system. The minimum contents of natural law constitute the basis of human tendencies or instincts. in his quest for survival. From the approaches of Marmor and Raz, it is proposed that in the recognition rule the minimum contents of natural law constitute the first filter for evaluating the validity of the particular legal norms subject to legal recognition, which provides solidity and significant consistency to the thesis of discretion and separability of the Hartian theory. |
|---|