Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process

In situ combustion (ISC) is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique with great potential for application in heavy and extra-heavy oil fields; however, its implementation has been limited due to the high degree of uncertainty associated with its development at the field scale. Considering the level...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad Industrial de Santander

Repositorio:: Repositorio UIS

Idioma:: spa

id	UISANTADR2_a7ab32342b6cae0ae204da6a92bc01c0
oai_identifier_str	oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/6715
network_acronym_str	UISANTADR2
network_name_str	Repositorio UIS
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Aplicación de una alternativa simplificada para modelar la cinética de un proceso de combustión in situ
title	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
spellingShingle	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process In situ combustion, kinetics, numerical simulation, heavy oil, combustion tube test, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), improved oil recovery (IOR). Combustión in situ, cinética, simulación numérica, crudo pesado, prueba de tubo de combustión, recuperación mejorada de petróleo.
title_short	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
title_full	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
title_fullStr	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
title_full_unstemmed	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
title_sort	Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv	In situ combustion, kinetics, numerical simulation, heavy oil, combustion tube test, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), improved oil recovery (IOR).
topic	In situ combustion, kinetics, numerical simulation, heavy oil, combustion tube test, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), improved oil recovery (IOR). Combustión in situ, cinética, simulación numérica, crudo pesado, prueba de tubo de combustión, recuperación mejorada de petróleo.
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Combustión in situ, cinética, simulación numérica, crudo pesado, prueba de tubo de combustión, recuperación mejorada de petróleo.
description	In situ combustion (ISC) is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique with great potential for application in heavy and extra-heavy oil fields; however, its implementation has been limited due to the high degree of uncertainty associated with its development at the field scale. Considering the level of complexity of the ISC process compared to other EOR / IOR techniques, to evaluate the technical feasibility of ISC in a specific reservoir will take far more complex screening methods and laboratory testing. Among the tests required to evaluate ISC include the kinetic cell tests, which are aimed at determining the oxidative behavior of the rock-fluid system under study, and in turn, allow obtaining a kinetic model that represents, by means of numerical modeling, the performance of the ISC process obtained experimentally in combustion tube tests. Based on the above, in the present work, the results obtained from the adjustment of a combustion tube test were compared using the Arrhenius and non- Arrhenius methodologies, evidencing significant differences in the computation time and in the residual oil saturation values in the porous medium after the implementation of the ISC process.
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-14T20:18:07Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-14T20:18:07Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2018-12-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafuentes/article/view/9166
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/6715
url	https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafuentes/article/view/9166 https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/6715
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafuentes/article/view/9166/9002
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Fuentes
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Fuentes http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv	Revista Fuentes, el reventón energético; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energético
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv	Fuentes, el reventón energético; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energético
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv	REVISTA FUENTES; v. 16 n. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energético
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	2145-8502 1657-6527
institution	Universidad Industrial de Santander
repository.name.fl_str_mv	DSpace at UIS
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	noesis@uis.edu.co
_version_	1814095171188424704
spelling	Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Fuenteshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2018-12-202022-03-14T20:18:07Z2022-03-14T20:18:07Zhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafuentes/article/view/9166https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/6715In situ combustion (ISC) is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique with great potential for application in heavy and extra-heavy oil fields; however, its implementation has been limited due to the high degree of uncertainty associated with its development at the field scale. Considering the level of complexity of the ISC process compared to other EOR / IOR techniques, to evaluate the technical feasibility of ISC in a specific reservoir will take far more complex screening methods and laboratory testing. Among the tests required to evaluate ISC include the kinetic cell tests, which are aimed at determining the oxidative behavior of the rock-fluid system under study, and in turn, allow obtaining a kinetic model that represents, by means of numerical modeling, the performance of the ISC process obtained experimentally in combustion tube tests. Based on the above, in the present work, the results obtained from the adjustment of a combustion tube test were compared using the Arrhenius and non- Arrhenius methodologies, evidencing significant differences in the computation time and in the residual oil saturation values in the porous medium after the implementation of the ISC process.La combustión in situ (CIS) es una técnica de recobro mejorado con un gran potencial de aplicación en yacimientos de crudos pesados y extrapesados; sin embargo, su implementación se ha visto limitada por el alto grado de incertidumbre asociado a su desarrollo a escala de campo. Teniendo en cuenta la alta complejidad del proceso con respecto a otras técnicas EOR/IOR, no basta con aplicar un screening binario y realizar pruebas básicas de laboratorio para determinar la factibilidad de aplicarla en un yacimiento determinado, sino que se requiere la realización de estudios adicionales, tales como pruebas de celda cinética, que están orientadas a determinar el comportamiento oxidativo del sistema roca-fluido en estudio, y a su vez, permiten la obtención de un modelo cinético que represente, mediante modelamiento numérico, el desempeño del proceso de CIS obtenido experimentalmente de pruebas de tubo de combustión. Con base en lo anterior, en el presente trabajo, se compararon los resultados obtenidos del ajuste de una prueba de tubo de combustión usando las metodologías Arrhenius y no Arrhenius, evidenciando diferencias significativas en el tiempo de cómputo y en los valores de saturación residual de aceite en el medio poroso después de aplicado el proceso CIS.application/pdfspaUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafuentes/article/view/9166/9002Revista Fuentes, el reventón energético; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energéticoFuentes, el reventón energético; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energéticoREVISTA FUENTES; v. 16 n. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energético2145-85021657-6527In situ combustion, kinetics, numerical simulation, heavy oil, combustion tube test, enhanced oil recovery (EOR), improved oil recovery (IOR).Combustión in situ, cinética, simulación numérica, crudo pesado, prueba de tubo de combustión, recuperación mejorada de petróleo.Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion processAplicación de una alternativa simplificada para modelar la cinética de un proceso de combustión in situinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Pinzón Diaz, Alberto RaúlPabón Acevedo, Yohan HarleyPadilla Reyes, Jorge MarioMuñoz Navarro, Samuel Fernando20.500.14071/6715oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/67152022-03-16 12:39:49.376metadata.onlyhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co

Simplified alternative to model the kinetics of an in-situ combustion process

Publicaciones similares