Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle

La monografía se ocupa de la noción -estrictamente filosófica- de la intencionalidad. En concreto, el texto ensaya la formulación del problema que consiste en preguntarse acerca de la forma correcta de atribuir o adscribir estados intencionales a diferentes tipos de sistemas. Con base en la teoría d...

Full description

Autores:
Bautista Gonzalez, Fabian Mauricio
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Repositorio:
Repositorio UIS
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/36247
Acceso en línea:
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/36247
https://noesis.uis.edu.co
Palabra clave:
Intencionalidad
Sistemas Artificiales
Inteligencia Artificial
Gofai
The Monograph Deals With The Notion -Strictly Philosophical- Of Intentionality. Specifically
The Text Tests The Formulation Of The Problem Of Asking The Right Way To Assign Or Ascribe Intentional States To Different Types Of Systems. Based On The Intentionality Theory Of The American Philosopher John Searle
The Objective Is To Determine The Intentional Class That Can Be Attributed To An Artificial System Of The Type Of Strong Artificial Intelligence And Gofai (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). It Is About To Understand The Sense In Which
For Searle
The Intentionality Of These Types Of Systems Is Not Intrinsic To Themselves But
Rather
It Is Derived Intentionality. This Implies Studying Both The Way In Which Searle Understands Intentionality And The Intentional Classes That Can Be Fixed From There: Intrinsic Intentionality
Derived Intentionality And As-If Intentionality. Among Other Things
Searle'S Classification Of Intentionality Compromises The Ontological Distinction Between That Which Is Relative To Us
Human Beings
And That Which Is Independent. In Such A Context
It Is Quite Fair To Think That The Monograph Is Focused -But Not Limited- On Presenting Searle'S Position Regarding One Of The Research Programs Of Artificial Intelligence
Namely Strong Artificial Intelligence Or Gofai.
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
id UISANTADR2_54ee3d4523b7debce0fca3df85d3d9d9
oai_identifier_str oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/36247
network_acronym_str UISANTADR2
network_name_str Repositorio UIS
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
dc.title.english.none.fl_str_mv Intentionality in artificial systems: an approach from
title Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
spellingShingle Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
Intencionalidad
Sistemas Artificiales
Inteligencia Artificial
Gofai
The Monograph Deals With The Notion -Strictly Philosophical- Of Intentionality. Specifically
The Text Tests The Formulation Of The Problem Of Asking The Right Way To Assign Or Ascribe Intentional States To Different Types Of Systems. Based On The Intentionality Theory Of The American Philosopher John Searle
The Objective Is To Determine The Intentional Class That Can Be Attributed To An Artificial System Of The Type Of Strong Artificial Intelligence And Gofai (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). It Is About To Understand The Sense In Which
For Searle
The Intentionality Of These Types Of Systems Is Not Intrinsic To Themselves But
Rather
It Is Derived Intentionality. This Implies Studying Both The Way In Which Searle Understands Intentionality And The Intentional Classes That Can Be Fixed From There: Intrinsic Intentionality
Derived Intentionality And As-If Intentionality. Among Other Things
Searle'S Classification Of Intentionality Compromises The Ontological Distinction Between That Which Is Relative To Us
Human Beings
And That Which Is Independent. In Such A Context
It Is Quite Fair To Think That The Monograph Is Focused -But Not Limited- On Presenting Searle'S Position Regarding One Of The Research Programs Of Artificial Intelligence
Namely Strong Artificial Intelligence Or Gofai.
title_short Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
title_full Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
title_fullStr Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
title_full_unstemmed Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
title_sort Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John Searle
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Bautista Gonzalez, Fabian Mauricio
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Maldonado Serrano, Jorge Francisco
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Bautista Gonzalez, Fabian Mauricio
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Intencionalidad
Sistemas Artificiales
Inteligencia Artificial
Gofai
topic Intencionalidad
Sistemas Artificiales
Inteligencia Artificial
Gofai
The Monograph Deals With The Notion -Strictly Philosophical- Of Intentionality. Specifically
The Text Tests The Formulation Of The Problem Of Asking The Right Way To Assign Or Ascribe Intentional States To Different Types Of Systems. Based On The Intentionality Theory Of The American Philosopher John Searle
The Objective Is To Determine The Intentional Class That Can Be Attributed To An Artificial System Of The Type Of Strong Artificial Intelligence And Gofai (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). It Is About To Understand The Sense In Which
For Searle
The Intentionality Of These Types Of Systems Is Not Intrinsic To Themselves But
Rather
It Is Derived Intentionality. This Implies Studying Both The Way In Which Searle Understands Intentionality And The Intentional Classes That Can Be Fixed From There: Intrinsic Intentionality
Derived Intentionality And As-If Intentionality. Among Other Things
Searle'S Classification Of Intentionality Compromises The Ontological Distinction Between That Which Is Relative To Us
Human Beings
And That Which Is Independent. In Such A Context
It Is Quite Fair To Think That The Monograph Is Focused -But Not Limited- On Presenting Searle'S Position Regarding One Of The Research Programs Of Artificial Intelligence
Namely Strong Artificial Intelligence Or Gofai.
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv The Monograph Deals With The Notion -Strictly Philosophical- Of Intentionality. Specifically
The Text Tests The Formulation Of The Problem Of Asking The Right Way To Assign Or Ascribe Intentional States To Different Types Of Systems. Based On The Intentionality Theory Of The American Philosopher John Searle
The Objective Is To Determine The Intentional Class That Can Be Attributed To An Artificial System Of The Type Of Strong Artificial Intelligence And Gofai (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). It Is About To Understand The Sense In Which
For Searle
The Intentionality Of These Types Of Systems Is Not Intrinsic To Themselves But
Rather
It Is Derived Intentionality. This Implies Studying Both The Way In Which Searle Understands Intentionality And The Intentional Classes That Can Be Fixed From There: Intrinsic Intentionality
Derived Intentionality And As-If Intentionality. Among Other Things
Searle'S Classification Of Intentionality Compromises The Ontological Distinction Between That Which Is Relative To Us
Human Beings
And That Which Is Independent. In Such A Context
It Is Quite Fair To Think That The Monograph Is Focused -But Not Limited- On Presenting Searle'S Position Regarding One Of The Research Programs Of Artificial Intelligence
Namely Strong Artificial Intelligence Or Gofai.
description La monografía se ocupa de la noción -estrictamente filosófica- de la intencionalidad. En concreto, el texto ensaya la formulación del problema que consiste en preguntarse acerca de la forma correcta de atribuir o adscribir estados intencionales a diferentes tipos de sistemas. Con base en la teoría de la intencionalidad del filósofo norteamericano John Searle, el objetivo es determinar la clase intencional que le es posible atribuir a un sistema artificial del tipo de la Inteligencia Artificial Fuerte y de tipo GOFAI (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). Se trata de comprender el sentido en el que, para Searle, la intencionalidad de estos tipos de sistemas no es intrínseca a ellos mismos sino que, más bien, es intencionalidad derivada. Lo anterior implica estudiar tanto la forma en la que Searle entiende la intencionalidad como las clases intencionales que pueden ser fijadas a partir de allí: intencionalidad intrínseca, intencionalidad derivada e intencionalidad como-si. Entre otras cosas, la clasificación de la intencionalidad de Searle compromete la distinción ontológica entre aquello que es relativo a nosotros, los seres humanos, y aquello que es independiente. En este contexto general, resulta bastante justo pensar que la monografía está enfocada -no por ello limitada- en presentar la posición de Searle respecto de uno de los programas investigativos de la Inteligencia Artificial, a saber, la Inteligencia Artificial Fuerte o GOFAL.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2024-03-03T23:19:06Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-03T23:19:06Z
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregrado
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce
format http://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcce
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/36247
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv https://noesis.uis.edu.co
url https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/36247
https://noesis.uis.edu.co
identifier_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.publisher.faculty.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Filosofía
dc.publisher.school.none.fl_str_mv Escuela de Filosofía
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
institution Universidad Industrial de Santander
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/99d9fe8e-c15c-45b6-9ad7-3da7cfbfcb3e/download
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/047aa2f4-1133-4548-8319-acc35f679e04/download
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/e9aae263-8c7d-463e-9288-4a689ed0cd92/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 9419d6cafc005995b9ce1a3f893bb04a
9145af131432a6a19f71003369b77cc4
8f6f01d558dd7e46d8d43562a3e6ec11
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv DSpace at UIS
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noesis@uis.edu.co
_version_ 1808402367031279616
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Maldonado Serrano, Jorge FranciscoBautista Gonzalez, Fabian Mauricio2024-03-03T23:19:06Z20172024-03-03T23:19:06Z20172017https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/36247Universidad Industrial de SantanderUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coLa monografía se ocupa de la noción -estrictamente filosófica- de la intencionalidad. En concreto, el texto ensaya la formulación del problema que consiste en preguntarse acerca de la forma correcta de atribuir o adscribir estados intencionales a diferentes tipos de sistemas. Con base en la teoría de la intencionalidad del filósofo norteamericano John Searle, el objetivo es determinar la clase intencional que le es posible atribuir a un sistema artificial del tipo de la Inteligencia Artificial Fuerte y de tipo GOFAI (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). Se trata de comprender el sentido en el que, para Searle, la intencionalidad de estos tipos de sistemas no es intrínseca a ellos mismos sino que, más bien, es intencionalidad derivada. Lo anterior implica estudiar tanto la forma en la que Searle entiende la intencionalidad como las clases intencionales que pueden ser fijadas a partir de allí: intencionalidad intrínseca, intencionalidad derivada e intencionalidad como-si. Entre otras cosas, la clasificación de la intencionalidad de Searle compromete la distinción ontológica entre aquello que es relativo a nosotros, los seres humanos, y aquello que es independiente. En este contexto general, resulta bastante justo pensar que la monografía está enfocada -no por ello limitada- en presentar la posición de Searle respecto de uno de los programas investigativos de la Inteligencia Artificial, a saber, la Inteligencia Artificial Fuerte o GOFAL.PregradoFilósofoIntentionality, Artificial systems, Artificial Intelligence, GOFAI, types ofapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Industrial de SantanderFacultad de Ciencias HumanasFilosofíaEscuela de FilosofíaIntencionalidadSistemas ArtificialesInteligencia ArtificialGofaiThe Monograph Deals With The Notion -Strictly Philosophical- Of Intentionality. SpecificallyThe Text Tests The Formulation Of The Problem Of Asking The Right Way To Assign Or Ascribe Intentional States To Different Types Of Systems. Based On The Intentionality Theory Of The American Philosopher John SearleThe Objective Is To Determine The Intentional Class That Can Be Attributed To An Artificial System Of The Type Of Strong Artificial Intelligence And Gofai (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence). It Is About To Understand The Sense In WhichFor SearleThe Intentionality Of These Types Of Systems Is Not Intrinsic To Themselves ButRatherIt Is Derived Intentionality. This Implies Studying Both The Way In Which Searle Understands Intentionality And The Intentional Classes That Can Be Fixed From There: Intrinsic IntentionalityDerived Intentionality And As-If Intentionality. Among Other ThingsSearle'S Classification Of Intentionality Compromises The Ontological Distinction Between That Which Is Relative To UsHuman BeingsAnd That Which Is Independent. In Such A ContextIt Is Quite Fair To Think That The Monograph Is Focused -But Not Limited- On Presenting Searle'S Position Regarding One Of The Research Programs Of Artificial IntelligenceNamely Strong Artificial Intelligence Or Gofai.Intencionalidad en sistemas artificiales: una aproximacion desde John SearleIntentionality in artificial systems: an approach fromTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bcceORIGINALCarta de autorización.pdfapplication/pdf320271https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/99d9fe8e-c15c-45b6-9ad7-3da7cfbfcb3e/download9419d6cafc005995b9ce1a3f893bb04aMD51Documento.pdfapplication/pdf12767287https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/047aa2f4-1133-4548-8319-acc35f679e04/download9145af131432a6a19f71003369b77cc4MD52Nota de proyecto.pdfapplication/pdf247950https://noesis.uis.edu.co/bitstreams/e9aae263-8c7d-463e-9288-4a689ed0cd92/download8f6f01d558dd7e46d8d43562a3e6ec11MD5320.500.14071/36247oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/362472024-03-03 18:19:06.041http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/open.accesshttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co