About “ethnocentrism” as a middle way between unconditional validity and non-cognitivism
This work will analyse Richard Rorty’s concept of “ethnocentrism,” which plays in his philosophy the role of a tertium between a theory of universal validity of beliefs, on the one hand, and a noncognitivist conception of their status, on the other hand. According to Rorty, there are certain beliefs...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Universidad Industrial de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UIS
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10632
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/3160
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10632
- Palabra clave:
- Rorty
etnocentrismo
creencia
Hume
no-cognitivismo
Rorty
ethnocentrism
belief
Hume
noncognitivism
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
| Summary: | This work will analyse Richard Rorty’s concept of “ethnocentrism,” which plays in his philosophy the role of a tertium between a theory of universal validity of beliefs, on the one hand, and a noncognitivist conception of their status, on the other hand. According to Rorty, there are certain beliefs which can not be justified on neutral grounds, and even though it renders them—as we will argue—unjustifiable simpliciter, he nonetheless regards them as unavoidable, inasmuch as “we” are conditioned to hold them due to “our” history and education. This tension will lead us in turn to deepen the interpretive key proposed by Michael Williams which brings together Rorty’s and David Hume’s theoretical approaches to the problem of certain beliefs. |
|---|