1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness
This paper attempts to analyze the case of the regime paramilitary which was victim the community of El Placer between 1999 and 2006. This essay has two main objectives. The first is to use some testimonies of the survivors to provide an overview of the hostile environment in which the population li...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Industrial de Santander
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UIS
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10777
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10777
- Palabra clave:
- memoria
política
perdón
justicia transicional
diferendo
memory
politics
forgiveness
transitional justice
differend
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
id |
UISANTADR2_17dba28d4075e9b37d6352713b1a2083 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/10777 |
network_acronym_str |
UISANTADR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UIS |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
1999: La masacre de El placer o el problema político de la memoria y el perdón |
title |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
spellingShingle |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness memoria política perdón justicia transicional diferendo memory politics forgiveness transitional justice differend |
title_short |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
title_full |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
title_fullStr |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
title_full_unstemmed |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
title_sort |
1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
memoria política perdón justicia transicional diferendo |
topic |
memoria política perdón justicia transicional diferendo memory politics forgiveness transitional justice differend |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
memory politics forgiveness transitional justice differend |
description |
This paper attempts to analyze the case of the regime paramilitary which was victim the community of El Placer between 1999 and 2006. This essay has two main objectives. The first is to use some testimonies of the survivors to provide an overview of the hostile environment in which the population lived. Here, I pretend to emphasize, especially, the harm and the perpetration on the women. The second objective is to analyze the Colombian problem of the memory, the politics and the forgiveness through the notion of the differend (différend), concept proposed and developed by the philosopher Jean F. Lyotard. My impression is that, from this point of view, we can criticize (i) the lack of participation of the Colombian State in the armed conflict places, and (ii) the solutions that, through of the law and the model of transitional justice of this period, were propose to solve the harm of the victims. More than venture a thesis, this text is an attempt to approach a rather recurring problem in the current academics discussions in Colombia: How to deal with the problem of the reconciliation between the victims and the victimizers where what prevails is the recognition of a harm that, in principle, is unforgivable? |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-07T15:41:15Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-07T15:41:15Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682 10.18273/revfil.v16n1-2017003 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10777 |
url |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682 https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10777 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18273/revfil.v16n1-2017003 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/6978 https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/11799 https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/204 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2017 Revista Filosofía UIS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Derechos de autor 2017 Revista Filosofía UIS http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Industrial de Santander |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-77 |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-77 |
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-77 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2145-8529 1692-2484 |
institution |
Universidad Industrial de Santander |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
DSpace at UIS |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noesis@uis.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814095226604617728 |
spelling |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)Derechos de autor 2017 Revista Filosofía UISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2017-09-112022-06-07T15:41:15Z2022-06-07T15:41:15Zhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/668210.18273/revfil.v16n1-2017003https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/10777This paper attempts to analyze the case of the regime paramilitary which was victim the community of El Placer between 1999 and 2006. This essay has two main objectives. The first is to use some testimonies of the survivors to provide an overview of the hostile environment in which the population lived. Here, I pretend to emphasize, especially, the harm and the perpetration on the women. The second objective is to analyze the Colombian problem of the memory, the politics and the forgiveness through the notion of the differend (différend), concept proposed and developed by the philosopher Jean F. Lyotard. My impression is that, from this point of view, we can criticize (i) the lack of participation of the Colombian State in the armed conflict places, and (ii) the solutions that, through of the law and the model of transitional justice of this period, were propose to solve the harm of the victims. More than venture a thesis, this text is an attempt to approach a rather recurring problem in the current academics discussions in Colombia: How to deal with the problem of the reconciliation between the victims and the victimizers where what prevails is the recognition of a harm that, in principle, is unforgivable?El presente ensayo pretende hacer un análisis crítico sobre el régimen de dominio paramilitar del que fue víctima la población de El Placer durante el periodo que va desde 1999 hasta el 2006. El trabajo tiene dos objetivos fundamentales. El primero es hacer uso de algunos testimonios de los sobrevivientes para ofrecer un panorama general del contexto hostil en el que vivió la población. De ahí se pretende resaltar, especialmente, el daño y los ejercicios de perpetración sobre las mujeres. El segundo objetivo es problematizar el tema de la memoria, de la política y del perdón en Colombia a través de la noción del diferendo (différend), concepto ya propuesto y desarrollado por el filósofo francés Jean F. Lyotard. Mi impresión es que, desde este punto de vista, se puede cuestionar (i) la falta de participación del Estado colombiano en escenarios del conflicto armado, y (ii) las soluciones que, por medio del derecho y del modelo de justicia transicional de la época, se proponen para dar solución a los daños de las víctimas. Más que aventurar una hipótesis, el texto constituye una tentativa por abordar un problema más bien recurrente en las actuales discusiones académicas en Colombia, a saber: ¿cómo lidiar con la reconciliación entre las víctimas y los victimarios donde lo que prima es el reconocimiento de un daño que, en principio, resulta imperdonable?application/pdftext/htmltext/xmlspaUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/6978https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/11799https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/6682/204Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-77Revista Filosofía UIS; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-77REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2017): Revista Filosofía UIS; 50-772145-85291692-2484memoriapolíticaperdónjusticia transicionaldiferendomemorypoliticsforgivenesstransitional justicedifferend1999: The slaughter of El placer or the political problem of the memory and the forgiveness1999: La masacre de El placer o el problema político de la memoria y el perdóninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Sánchez-Medina, Johan Camilo20.500.14071/10777oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/107772022-06-07 10:41:15.541metadata.onlyhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co |