Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad
It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of...
- Autores:
-
Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana
Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad La Gran Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UGC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ugc.edu.co:11396/4744
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744
- Palabra clave:
- Privación - Injusta - Libertad
Proceso - Penal
Políticas públicas
Justicia penal - Administración
Compensación - Error judicial
Ejecución judicial
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
UGC2_56ef24555e50b8a61e7cbf1cc39747b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ugc.edu.co:11396/4744 |
network_acronym_str |
UGC2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UGC |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
title |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
spellingShingle |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad Privación - Injusta - Libertad Proceso - Penal Políticas públicas Justicia penal - Administración Compensación - Error judicial Ejecución judicial |
title_short |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
title_full |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
title_fullStr |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
title_full_unstemmed |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
title_sort |
Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertad |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos |
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
García Vanegas, David |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Candil Forero, Angélica Tatiana Ramos Díaz, Juan Carlos |
dc.contributor.email.spa.fl_str_mv |
- |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Privación - Injusta - Libertad Proceso - Penal Políticas públicas |
topic |
Privación - Injusta - Libertad Proceso - Penal Políticas públicas Justicia penal - Administración Compensación - Error judicial Ejecución judicial |
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Justicia penal - Administración Compensación - Error judicial Ejecución judicial |
description |
It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subject |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-27T16:36:04Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-27T16:36:04Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
bachelorThesis |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.sede.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad La Gran Colombia |
dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Postgrados |
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Especialización en Derecho Administrativo |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname: Universidad La Gran Colombia reponame: Repositorio Institucional UGC |
instname_str |
Universidad La Gran Colombia |
institution |
Universidad La Gran Colombia |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional UGC |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional UGC |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/677546b4-12de-42d6-8dfa-ec8778148201/download https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/06570d5b-605c-412f-840b-1fcf62ce6e82/download https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/b302c4e4-2dc8-4cc8-88b0-e5d20436ff19/download https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/ba3118fa-1f8f-4e35-9f02-0ad7db001537/download https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/9c04ad9e-03a5-42a7-bfb5-2d8517a7cbd5/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5332d940dad17b0eeb478f71263ee023 0745a8054d332ce364eceda3d7dfbaa7 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 2aaf3383f452c4cb034477c0a941fc43 de7b559f06ff05668a42148a4e26ce8e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional - Universidad La Gran Colombia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ugc.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814094637201096704 |
spelling |
García Vanegas, DavidCandil Forero, Angélica TatianaRamos Díaz, Juan CarlosEspecialista en Derecho Administrativo-Bogotá2019-06-27T16:36:04Z2019-06-27T16:36:04Z2018It is evident that every day there is an increase in the number of demands for the means of control of direct reparation, impetrated by the personnel that has been acquitted in a criminal proceeding and they consider that the State has the duty to compensate them for the time they lasted deprived of freedom, even in cases of preventive detention, better known as an assurance measure to guarantee the appearance of the subject to the criminal process. The National Agency for Legal Defense of the State, has stated that within its powers is to formulate public policies in matters of prevention of unlawful public conduct, unlawful damage and the extension of its effects (Decree 4085 of 2011, Article 2), and in recent years has expressed concern about the numerous litigation facing the State in the matter of unjust deprivation of liberty, manifested the need to acquire theoretical bases and empirical evidence to indicate what is the thinking of the high courts in this matter and what have been the assumptions that have allowed the current jurisprudence to draw the dominant opinion on this issue. In addition, it is evident that every day the causes of the patrimonial responsibility of the State have been extended, which can have great consequences in the economic sphere of the State and impede the development of the country. We will provide an analysis from the substantial point of view of the responsibility of the State for judicial activity in Colombia, taking as its main axis the State's responsibility for unjust deprivation of liberty, as that consequence of the damages produced with the provisional prison, determining the foundation of the notion of unlawful damage and relying on the different interpretations of the high courts on the subjectSe evidencia que cada día va en aumento la cifra de demandas por el medio de control de reparación directa, impetradas por el personal que ha sido absuelto en un proceso penal y consideran que el Estado tiene el deber de indemnizarlos por el tiempo que duraron privados de la libertad, aun en los casos de la detención preventiva, más conocida como una medida de aseguramiento para garantizar la comparecencia del sujeto al proceso penal. La Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado, ha manifestado que dentro de sus facultades se encuentra formular políticas públicas en materia de prevención de las conductas públicas antijurídicas, del daño antijurídico y la extensión de sus efectos (decreto 4085 de 2011, artículo 2), y en los últimos años ha manifestado su preocupación respecto a los numerosos litigios que afronta el Estado en materia de privación injusta de la libertad, manifestado la necesidad de adquirir bases teóricas y evidencia empíricas que indiquen cuál es el pensamiento de las altas cortes en esta materia y cuáles han sido los supuestos que le han permitido a la jurisprudencia actual trazar la opinión dominante en esta temática. Además, se evidencia que cada día se ha ido ampliando las causales de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado lo que puede traer grandes consecuencias en materia económica del Estado e impedir el desarrollo del país. Se efectúa un análisis desde el punto de vista sustancial, de la responsabilidad del Estado por la actividad judicial en Colombia, tomando como eje principal la Responsabilidad del Estado por privación injusta de la libertad, como aquella consecuencia de los daños producidos con la prisión provisional, determinando el fundamento de la noción de daño antijurídico y apoyándonos en las distintas interpretaciones de las altas cortes respecto al temaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11396/4744spaUniversidad La Gran ColombiaFacultad de PostgradosEspecialización en Derecho Administrativoinstname: Universidad La Gran Colombiareponame: Repositorio Institucional UGCPrivación - Injusta - LibertadProceso - PenalPolíticas públicasJusticia penal - AdministraciónCompensación - Error judicialEjecución judicialResponsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado por la privacidad injusta de la libertadbachelorThesisTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ORIGINALResponsabilidad_patrimonial_privación_injusta.pdfResponsabilidad_patrimonial_privación_injusta.pdfapplication/pdf485552https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/677546b4-12de-42d6-8dfa-ec8778148201/download5332d940dad17b0eeb478f71263ee023MD51Carta_autorizada.pdfCarta_autorizada.pdfapplication/pdf241153https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/06570d5b-605c-412f-840b-1fcf62ce6e82/download0745a8054d332ce364eceda3d7dfbaa7MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/b302c4e4-2dc8-4cc8-88b0-e5d20436ff19/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILResponsabilidad_patrimonial_privación_injusta.pdf.jpgResponsabilidad_patrimonial_privación_injusta.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg7209https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/ba3118fa-1f8f-4e35-9f02-0ad7db001537/download2aaf3383f452c4cb034477c0a941fc43MD54Carta_autorizada.pdf.jpgCarta_autorizada.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg6193https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.com/bitstreams/9c04ad9e-03a5-42a7-bfb5-2d8517a7cbd5/downloadde7b559f06ff05668a42148a4e26ce8eMD5511396/4744oai:ugc7.repositoriodigital.com:11396/47442019-08-12 11:18:29.921https://ugc7.repositoriodigital.comRepositorio Institucional - Universidad La Gran Colombiarepositorio@ugc.edu.co |