Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento

Actualmente existen repositorios y bibliotecas digitales que dan acceso a miles de recursos cataloga dos y organizados de acuerdo a las descripciones de sus colecciones. Esta gran cantidad de recursos en su mayoría no tienen un alcance y/o visibilidad que permita ser consultados en su totalidad por...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
Repositorio:
RIUD: repositorio U. Distrital
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.udistrital.edu.co:11349/32620
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/11349/32620
Palabra clave:
Ontologías
Tesauros
Interfaces navegacionales
Recursos digitales
Repositorios digitales
Búsqueda visual
Web semántica
Representación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)
Ontologies
Thesauri
Navigational Interfaces
Digital Resources
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
id UDISTRITA2_f3303c5f6686ca105371d6f573e426f6
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.udistrital.edu.co:11349/32620
network_acronym_str UDISTRITA2
network_name_str RIUD: repositorio U. Distrital
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
dc.title.titleenglish.spa.fl_str_mv Navigational search environments based on knowledge representation schemes ​
title Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
spellingShingle Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
Ontologías
Tesauros
Interfaces navegacionales
Recursos digitales
Repositorios digitales
Búsqueda visual
Web semántica
Representación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)
Ontologies
Thesauri
Navigational Interfaces
Digital Resources
title_short Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
title_full Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
title_fullStr Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
title_full_unstemmed Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
title_sort Entornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv Gaona Garcia, Paulo Alonso [0000-0002-8758-1412]
Martín-Moncunil, David [0000-0003-2422-9005]
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Ontologías
Tesauros
Interfaces navegacionales
Recursos digitales
topic Ontologías
Tesauros
Interfaces navegacionales
Recursos digitales
Repositorios digitales
Búsqueda visual
Web semántica
Representación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)
Ontologies
Thesauri
Navigational Interfaces
Digital Resources
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Repositorios digitales
Búsqueda visual
Web semántica
Representación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Ontologies
Thesauri
Navigational Interfaces
Digital Resources
description Actualmente existen repositorios y bibliotecas digitales que dan acceso a miles de recursos cataloga dos y organizados de acuerdo a las descripciones de sus colecciones. Esta gran cantidad de recursos en su mayoría no tienen un alcance y/o visibilidad que permita ser consultados en su totalidad por los actuales métodos de búsquedas convencionales, como los son motores de búsquedas textuales. Bajo esta premisa, el presente libro plantea una serie de estrategias de búsqueda visuales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento (ontologías y tesauros), mediante el uso de inter faces navegacionales que permitan mejorar las condiciones actuales de acceso a la mayoría de estas colecciones de recursos digitales. Para ello se utilizarán principios de diseños centrado en usuario y aspectos relacionados con usabilidad, con el propósito de explorar posibles formas para desplegar información dentro de una colección de recursos digitales alojados en un repositorio, y analizar sus diferencias con el fin de llegar a conclusiones que permitan identificar ventajas y desventajas de cada una de ellas para su implementación
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-03T01:17:49Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-03T01:17:49Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv book
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33
dc.identifier.isbn.spa.fl_str_mv 978-958-787-004-6
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11349/32620
dc.identifier.editorial.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Científico
identifier_str_mv 978-958-787-004-6
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo Científico
url http://hdl.handle.net/11349/32620
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv Espacios
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv pdf
institution Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., Deambrosis, G., Ferro, N., Gäde, M., Petras, V. & Stiller, J. (2009). D2. 1.1–Report on User Preferences and Information Retrieval Scenarios for Multilingual Access in Europeana. EuropeanaConnect, ECP-2008-DILI- 528001. Recuperado de http://www.europeanaconnect.eu/documents/D2.1.1_eConnect_Report_User_Preferences_MLIA_v1.0_20091222.zip
Agrovoc, 2017. Tesauro multilingüe de agricultura. Recuperado de http://aims.fao.org/es/agrovoc
Aitchison, J., Gilchrist, A. & Bawden, D. (2001). Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual (7th ed). Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers,
Aitta, M., Kaleva, S. & Kortelainen, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services. New Library World, 109(1/2), 25-45.
Alva, M., Martínez, A., Suárez, M., Labra, J., Cueva, J. & Sagastegui, H. (2010). Towards the evaluation of usability in educative websites. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 145-161.
Allan, J., Leuski, A., Swan, R. & Byrd, D. (2001). Evaluating combinations of ranked lists and visualizations of inter-document similarity. Information processing & management, 37(3), 435-458.
Allen, R., Obry, P. & Littman, M. (1993). An interface for navigating clustered document sets returned by queries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems, Milpitas, California, United States.
ANSI/NISO. (2005). ANSI/NISO Z39.19 Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. National Information Standards Organization (Estados Unidos): American National Standards Institute
Arano, S. & Codina, L. (2004). La estructura conceptual de los tesauros en el entorno digital: nuevas esperanzas para viejos problemas. Jornades Catalanes d’Infornació i Documentació, 9, 14.
Armstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R., Stoker, D., Thomas, R. & Urquhart, C. (2001). A study of the use of electronic information systems by higher education students in the UK. Program: electronic library and information systems, 35(3), 241-262.
Aroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G., Kravcik, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M. & Wild, F. (2006). Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 4-18.
Aula, A. & Käki, M. (2005). Less is more in Web search interfaces for older adults. First Monday, 10(7-4).
Baeza, R. & Castillo, C. (2004). Crawling the infinite Web: five levels are enough. Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph, 3243, 156-167.
Baker, K. (2006). Learning objects and process interoperability. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 167-172.
Barton, J., Currier, S. & Hey, J. (2003). Building quality assurance into metadata creation: an analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice. Paper presented at the Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications, September 28 - October 2 (2003), Seattle, Washington, USA.
Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R. & Tollis, I. (1998). Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice Hall PTR.
Bederson, B., Shneiderman, B. & Wattenberg, M. (2002). Ordered and Quantum Treemaps: Making Effective Use of 2D Space to Display Hierarchies. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 21(4), 833-854.
Benford, S., Snowdon, D., Greenhalgh, C., Ingram, R., Knox, I. & Brown, C. (1995). VR- VIBE: A Virtual Environment for Co-operative Information Re- trieval. Computer Graphics Forum, 14(3), 349-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.1995.cgf143_0349.x
Bevan, N. & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(1-2), 132-145.
Bizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1-22.
Blanch, R. & Lecolinet, E. (2007). Browsing Zoomable Treemaps: Structure-Aware Multi- Scale Navigation Techniques. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1248-1253. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2007.70540
Blocks, D., Binding, C., Cunliffe, D. & Tudhope, D. (2002). Qualitative evaluation of thesaurus-based retrieval. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 346-361, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Boldi, P., Codenotti, B., Santini, M. & Vigna, S. (2004). Ubicrawler: A scalable fully distributed web crawler. Software: Practice and Experience, 34(8), 711-726.
Booth, P. (1989). An introduction to human-computer interaction. London, UK: Psychology Press.
Boren, T. & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), 261-278.
Bostock, M. & Heer, J. (2009). Protovis: A graphical toolkit for visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6), 1121-1128.
Boulos, M., Warren, J., Gong, J. & Yue, P. (2010). Web GIS in practice VIII: HTML5 and the canvas element for interactive online mapping. International journal of health geographics, 9(1), 14.
Brachman, R. & Schmolze, J. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive science, 9(2), 171-216.
Bremm, S., Von Landesberger, T., Hess, M., Schreck, T., Weil, P. & Hamacherk, K. (2011). Interactive visual comparison of multiple trees. Paper presented at the VAST 2011 - IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2011, Proceedings, 31-40. doi:10.1109/VAST.2011.6102439
Bruce, T. & Hillmann, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. Chicago, IL: D.Hillman & E.Westbrooks (Eds.).
Bruno, D. & Richmond, H. (2003). The truth about taxonomies. Information management journal, 37(2), 48-52.
Buchanan, S. & Salako, A. (2009). Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a digital library. Library Review, 58(9), 638-651.
Bui, Y. & Park, J. (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. H. Moukdad (ed.) Proceedings of CAIS/ ACSI 2006 Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation, 13.
Buttenfield, B. (1999). Usability evaluation of digital libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17(3-4), 39-59.
Card, S., Mackinlay, J. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.146
Castells, L. (2007). Los protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta como instrumento para analizar el proceso de escritura. Revista española de lingüística aplicada (20), 27- 36.
Castells, P. (2002). Aplicación de técnicas de la web semántica. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Castillo, C. (2005). Effective web crawling. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 39, 55-56.
Castillo, L. (2006). Elaboración de un tesauro de información de actualidad y conversión en red semántica para su empleo en un sistema de recuperación periodístico. Universidad de Valencia: Valencia.
Cavieres Abarca, A., Fredes Mena, S. & Ramírez Novoa, A. (2010). Tesauros y web semántica: diseño metodológico para estructurar contenidos web mediante SKOS-Core. Serie bibliotecología y gestión de información, (57), 1-64.
Cechinel, C., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Empirical analysis of errors on humangenerated learning objects metadata. Proceedings Metadata and Semantic Research Third International Conference, Milan, Italy, pp. 60-70.
Cechinel, C., Silva, S., Ochoa, X., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2012). Populating Learning Object Repositories with Hidden Internal Quality Information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (RecSysTEL 2012). Manouselis, N., Draschler, H., Verber, K., and Santos, OC (Eds.). Published by CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Centelles, M. (2005). Taxonomías para la categorización y la organización de la información en sitios web. Hipertext.net.
Cervera, J., López, M., Fernández, C. & Sánchez, S. (2009). Quality metrics in learning objects. Metadata and Semantics, 135-141.
Cleveland, W. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. Amer. Stat., 38(4).
Cleveland, W., Diaconis, P. & McGill, R. (1982). Variables on scatterplots look more highly correlated when the scales are increased. Defense Technical Information Center.
Clyphan, R. & Sugimoto. (2009). Europeana Semantic Element ESE v3.4.1. Recuperado de http://pro.europeana.eu/web/guest/technical-requirements/.
Cockburn, A. & McKenzie, B. (2000). An evaluation of cone trees. People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else. British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 425-436, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Codina, L. (2000). Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos. Revista española de documentación científica, 23(1), 9-44.
Corcho, O., Fernández, M. & Gómez, A. (2003). Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data & knowledge engineering, 46(1), 41-64.
Crockford, D. (2006). The application/json media type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).
Cugini, J., Laskowski, S. & Sebrechts, M. (2000). Presenting search results: design, visualization and evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Information Doors. Where Information Search and Hypertext Link Workshop.
Chen, C. (2004). Information visualization: Beyond the horizon. Springer, 2(16), 316.
Chirita, P., Gavriloaie, R., Ghita, S., Nejdl, W. & Paiu, R. (2005). Activity based metadata for semantic desktop search. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 439-454, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Chrysafiadi, K. & Virvou, M. (2013). A knowledge representation approach using fuzzy cognitive maps for better navigation support in an adaptive learning system. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 81.
Chuanjun, S. (2004). On the Evaluation of the Quality of Digital Collections. The Journal of the Library Science in China, 4.
Davis, P. & Connolly, M. (2007). Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non- use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4).
Davis, R., Shrobe, H. & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a knowledge representation?. AI magazine, 14(1), 17.
De la Prieta, F. & Gil, A. (2010). A multi-agent system that searches for learning objects in heterogeneous repositories. Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 355-362.
Design, P. (1998). Visual Thesaurus. Recuperado de http://www.visualthesaurus.com
Dietze, S., Yu, H., Giordano, D., Kaldoudi, E., Dovrolis, N. & Taibi, D. (2012). Linked Education: interlinking educational Resources and the Web of Data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.
Dinkla, K., Westenberg, M., Timmerman, H., Van Hijum, S. & Van Wijk, J. (2011). Comparison of multiple weighted hierarchies: visual analytics for microbe community profiling. Computer Graphics Forum, 30, 1141-1150.
Dix, A., Janet, E., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. (2003). Human computer interaction. NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C. & Van de Sompel, H. (2010). The Europeana Data Model (EDM). Paper presented at the Proceedings of IFLA, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.
Draper, G., Livnat, Y. & Riesenfeld, R. (2009). A Survey of Radial Methods for Information Visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(5), 759-776. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.23
Dumas, J. & Redish, J. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. England: Intellect.
Duncan, S. (2009). Patterns of learning object reuse in the Connexions repository. Tesis doctoral. Utah State University, Logan, USA.
Durkin, J. (1994). Expert systems: design and development. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
Eades, P. & Sugiyama, K. (1990). How to Draw a Directed Graph J. Information Processing, 13(4), pp. 424-434.
Edwards, J., McCurley, K. & Tomlin, J. (2001). An adaptive model for optimizing performance of an incremental web crawler. WWW Conference, Hong Kong, China.
English, J., Hearst, M., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K. & Lee, K. (2002). Flexible search and navigation using faceted metadata. Technical report, University of Berkeley, School of Information Management and Systems, 2003. Submitted for publication. Europeana, 2017. Europeana REST API. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana. eu/api/introduction.
Europeana. (2017b). Europeana Linked Open Data. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana.eu/api/linked-open-data-introduction.
Fang, X. & Holsapple, C. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 476-491.
Fekete, J. (2004). The infovis toolkit. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.
Fekete, J., Hémery, P., Baudel, T. & Wood, J. (2011). Obvious: A meta-toolkit to encapsulate information visualization toolkits—one toolkit to bind them all. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on.
Fernández, A. (2011). La construcción de tesauros académicos: un modelo general y un método inductivo con aplicación al “e-learning”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.
Fernández, J. (2001). Modelos de Recuperación de Información basados en Redes de Creencia. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada, España.
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. (2003). Describing knowledge representation schemes: A formal account. Technical Rep. No. TR-320, Institute of Computer Science—Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (ICS-FORTH), Crete, Greece.
Foltz, M. (1997). An information space design rationale.
Fox, E., Gonçalves, M. & Kipp, N. (2002). Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Digital libraries, pp. 623-641, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Fox, E., Hix, D., Nowell, L., Brueni, D., Wake, W., Heath, L. & Rao, D. (1999). Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(8), 480-491.
Fox, E. & Logan, E. (2005). An Asian digital libraries perspective. Information processing & management, 41(1), 1-4.
Friesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects?. Interactive learning environments, 9(3), 219-230.
Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).
Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Fulton, S. & Fulton, J. (2013). HTML5 Canvas: O’Reilly Media. Furnas, G. (1986). Generalized fisheye views (Vol. 17): ACM.
Furnas, G. & Zacks, J. (1994). Multitrees: enriching and reusing hierarchical structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Gaona-García, P., Martín, D., Fermoso, A. & Sánchez, S. (2014). A usability study of taxonomy-visualization user interfaces in digital repositories. Journal Online Information review, 38(2).
Gaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Gaona, E. (2013). Prototipo informático para extracción de recursos digitales sobre internet. Revista Tecnura, 17, 79-92.
Gaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Montenegro, C. (2014). Visualization of information: a proposal to improve the search and access to digital resources in repositories. Ingeniería e investigación, 34(1), 83-89.
Gaona-García, P., Fermoso-García, A. & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2017). Exploring the Relevance of Europeana Digital Resources: Preliminary Ideas on Europeana Metadata Quality/Exploración de la relevancia de los recursos digitales de Eu- ropeana: ideas preliminares sobre la calidad de los metadatos Europeana. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 40(1), 59.
Gašević, D., Djurić, D. & Devedzic, V. (2009). Model driven engineering and ontology development. Springerverlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Gašević, D. & Hatala, M. (2006). Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 375-389.
Genesereth, M. & Ketchpel, S. (1994). Software agents. Commun. ACM, 37(7), 48-53, 147.
Gero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI magazine, 11(4), 26.
Gilchrist, A. (2003). Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies–an etymological note. Journal of documentation, 59(1), 7-18
Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D. & Roberts, J. C. (2011). Visual comparison for information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 289-309.
Gonçalves, M., Moreira, B., Fox, E. & Watson, L. (2007). What is a good digital library? – A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1416-1437. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.010.
González, V. & Kobsa, A. (2003). Benefits of information visualization systems for administrative data analysts. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.
Graham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2005). Extending taxonomic visualisation to incorporate synonymy and structural markers. Information Visualization, 4(3), 206-223.
Graham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2010). A survey of multiple tree visualisation. Information Visualization, 9(4), 235-252.
Graham, M., Kennedy, J. & Benyon, D. (2000). Towards a methodology for developing visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 789- 807.
Granollers, T. (2004). MPIu+ a. Una metodología que integra la Ingeniería del Software, la Interacción Persona-Ordenador y la Accesibilidad en el contexto de equipos de desarrollo multidisciplinares. Tesis doctoral. Universitat de Lleida, España.
Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
Guarino, N. & Poli, R. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(5), 625-640.
Guha, R., McCool, R. & Miller, E. (2003). Semantic search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web.
Harger, J. & Crossno, P. (2012). Comparison of open-source visual analytics toolkits. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis.
Hargittai, E. (2004). Classifying and coding online actions. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 210-227.
Hartson, H., Shivakumar, P. & Pérez, M. (2004). Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case study. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4(2), 108-123.
Haslhofer, B., & Isaac, A. (2011). Data Europeana. EU: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 21 - 23 September 2011, The Hague, Netherlands.
Hassan, Y., Martín, F. & Iazza, G. (2004). Diseño web centrado en el usuario: usabilidad y arquitectura de la información. Hipertext.net (2).
Hayati, Z. & Jowkar, T. (2008). Adoption of electronic reference materials in academic libraries of Iran. The International Information & Library Review, 40(1), 52-63.
Herman, I., Melancon, G. & Marshall, M. S. (2000). Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 6(1), 24-43. doi: 10.1109/2945.841119
Hearst, M. (1995). TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Hearst, M. (2009). Search user interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hearst, M. & Karadi, C. (1997). Cat-a-Cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. Paper presented at the ACM SIGIR Forum.
Heer, J. & Bostock, M. (2010). Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 203-212.
Heer, J., Card, S. & Landay, J. (2005). Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Heer, J., Kong, N. & Agrawala, M. (2009). Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Hemmje, M., Kunkel, C. & Willett, A. (1994). LyberWorld, a visualization user interface supporting fulltext retrieval. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.
Hetzler, E. & Turner, A. (2004). Analysis experiences using information visualization. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 24(5), 22-26.
Hitchcock, S., Woukeu, A., Brody, T., Carr, L., Hall, W. & Harnad, S. (2003). Evaluating Citebase, an open access Web-based citation-ranked search and impact discovery service. Monograph (Technical Report), University of Southampton, England.
Hodgins, W. & Conner, M. (2000). Everything you ever wanted to know about learning standards but were afraid to ask. Learning in the New Economy e-Magazine (Line Zine).
Hoffman, P., Grinstein, G., Marx, K., Grosse, I. & Stanley, E. (1997). DNA visual and analytic data mining. Paper presented at the Visualization 97´, Proceedings.
Holzschuher, F. & Peinl, R. (2013). Performance of graph query languages: comparison of cypher, gremlin and native access in Neo4j. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops.
Howland, J., Jonassen, D. & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Pearson Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Huang, M., Liang, J. & Nguyen, Q. (2008). A Usability Study on the Use of Multi-Context Visualization. Paper presented at the CGIV ‘08. Fifth International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, 26-28 Aug. 2008.
Hughes, B. (2005). Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the open language archives community. Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross- Fertilization, 135-148.
ISO. (1985). ISO 5964-1985. Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/standard/12159.html
ISO. (1998). ISO 9241 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11. Guidance on Usability. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/ standard/16883.html
ISO. (2001). ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use.
Jacob, R. & Karn, K. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 4.
Jain, P. & Babbar, P. (2006). Digital libraries initiatives in India. The International Information & Library Review, 38(3), 161-169.
Jeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri, 55(2-3), 96-121.
Jeng, J. (2009). What should we take into consideration when we talk about usability? Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (eds.) Evaluation of digital libraries. An insight into useful applications and methods. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp. 63–73
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Knight, C. & Richards, G. (2007). Ontologies for effective use of context in e-learning settings. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 47- 59.
Kani, E., Ghinea, G. & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: what do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395-412.
Keim, D., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J. & Schreck, T. (2006). Monitoring network traffic with radial traffic analyzer. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2006 IEEE Symposium On.
Kelty, C., Burrus, C. & Baraniuk, R. (2008). Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 1000-1011.
Khoo, M., Kusunoki, D. & MacDonald, C. (2012). Finding Problems: When Digital Library Users Act as Usability Evaluators. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, 4-7 Jan. 2012.
Kim, H. & Kim, Y. (2008). Usability study of digital institutional repositories. Electronic Library, The, 26(6), 863-881.
Klerkx, J., Duval, E. & Meire, M. (2004). Using information visualization for accessing learning object repositories. 2004. IV 2004. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, 465-470. doi: 10.1109/ iv.2004.1320185
Klerkx, J., Meire, M., Ternier, S., Verbert, K. & Duval, E. (2005). Information visualisation: towards an extensible framework for accessing learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications.
Kobsa, A. (2004). User experiments with tree visualization systems. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.
Komlodi, A., Marchionini, G. & Soergel, D. (2007). Search history support for finding and using information: User interface design recommendations from a user study. Information Processing & Management, 43(1), 10-29. doi: 10.1016/j. ipm.2006.05.017
Kruskal, J. & Landwehr, J. (1983). Icicle plots: Better displays for hierarchical clustering. The American Statistician, 37(2), 162-168.
Kumar, V., Nesbit, J. & Han, K. (2005). Rating learning object quality with distributed bayesian belief networks: The why and the how. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on.
Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Johnston, P., Nelson, M., Sanderson, R. & Warner, S. (2007). Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE). Technical report, Open Archives Initiative.
Lamping, J., Rao, R. & Pirolli, P. (1995). A focus+ context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Lamping, L. & Rao, R. (1996). The Hyperbolic Browser: A Focus+Context Technique for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7(1), pp. 33-55.
Lee, M., Reilly, R. & Butavicius, M. (2003). An empirical evaluation of Chernoff faces, star glyphs, and spatial visualizations for binary data. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
Lee, M. & Vickers, D. (1998). Psychological approaches to data visualisation: DTIC Document. Departament of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Lei, M. (2008). Knowledge organization systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 35(2- 3), 160-182.
Lewis, C. (1982). Using the” thinking-aloud” method in cognitive interface design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center.
Li, J., Gasevic, D., Nesbit, J. & Richards, G. (2005). Ontology Mappings Enable Interoperation of Knowledge Domain Taxonomies. Paper presented at the 2nd LORNET international annual conference.
Lidwell, W., Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2010). Universal Principles of Design. 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Tech Through Design [25 Additional Design Principles]: Rockport publishers.
Liew, C. & Foo, S. (1999). Derivation of interaction environment and information object properties for enhanced integrated access and value-adding to electronic documents. Paper presented at the Aslib Proceedings.
Lin, X. (1997). Map displays for information retrieval. JASIS, 48(1), 40-54.
Lin, Y., Ahn, J., Brusilovsky, P., He, D. & Real, W. (2010). Imagesieve: Exploratory search of museum archives with named entity-based faceted browsing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701217
Lindberg, D., Humphreys, B. & McCray, A. (1993). The Unified Medical Language System. Methods of information in medicine, 32(4), 281.
Livnat, Y., Agutter, J., Moon, S., Erbacher, R. & Foresti, S. (2005). A visualization paradigm for network intrusion detection. Paper presented at the Information Assuran- ce Workshop, 2005. IAW’05. Proceedings from the Sixth Annual IEEE SMC.
Longmire, W. (2000). A primer on learning objects. Learning Circuits, 1(3).
Lytras, M. & Sicilia, M. (2007). Where is the value in metadata? International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(4), 235-241.
Mackinlay, J. (1991). Search architectures for the automatic design of graphical presentations. ACM Press, New York, 281-292.
Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P. & Stolte, C. (2007). Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1137-1144.
Mangold, C. (2007). A survey and classification of semantic search approaches. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(1), 23-34.
Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University Press
Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University Press
Marchionini, G. (2008). Human–information interaction research and development. Library & amp; Information Science Research, 30(3), 165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2008.07.001
Marchionini, G. & White, R. (2010). Find what you need, understand what you find. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 23(3), 205-237.
Margaryan, A. & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Repositories and communities at cross-purposes: issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources. 24, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x (4)
Martín-Moncunill, D., Sánchez, S., Gaona, P. & Marianos, N. (2013). Applying visualization techniques to develop interfaces for educational repositories: the case of Organic. Lingua and VOA3R. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Learning Innova- tions and Quality: The Future of Digital Resources, Rome.
McGreal, R. (2008). A typology of learning object repositories. Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, 5-28.
McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R. & Cunningham, S. (2004). Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(4), 283-297.
Merčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2009). Visualizing FRBR. Libraries in the Digital Age, LIDA 2009, 25-30 May, Dubrovnik and Zadar Croatia, 209-215.
Merčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2010). Visualizing for explorations and discovery. Paper presented at the Proc. of the conf. on Libraries in the Digital Age, Zadar, Croatia.
Merčun, T., Žumer, M. & Aalberg, T. (2012). FrbrVis: An Information Visualization Approach to Presenting FRBR Work Families Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. In P. Zaphiris, G. Buchanan, E. Rasmussen & F. Loizides (eds.), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Vol. 7489, pp. 504-507, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Miles, A., Matthews, B., Wilson, M. & Brickley, D. (2005). SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications “Metadata Vocabularies in Practice”, 12-15 September 2005, Leganés - Madrid, Spain.
Mizoguchi, R., Vanwelkenhuysen, J. & Ikeda, M. (1995). Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building & Knowledge Sharing, 46-57.
Moen, W., Stewart, E. & McClure, C. (1997). The role of content analysis in evaluating metadata for the us government information locator service (gils): results from an explora- tory study. GILSMDContentAnalysis.htm.
Mora, M. (2004). Interacción en interfaces de recuperación de información: conceptos, metáforas y visualización. Gijón: Trea.
Morante, M. (2003). Usability guidelines for taxonomy development. Montague Institue Recuperado de http://www.montague.com/abstracts/usability.html
Muelder, C. & Ma, K. (2008). A treemap based method for rapid layout of large graphs. Paper presented at the Visualization Symposium, 2008. PacificVIS ‘08. IEEE Pacific, Tokio.
Muñoz, J., Calvillo, E., Ochoa, C., Santaolaya, R. & Álvarez, F. (2010). Use of Agents to Realize a Federated Searching of Learning Objects. Trends in Practical Applica- tions of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1-8.
Nakayama, K., Hara, T. & Nishio, S. (2007,). A Thesaurus Construction Method from Large ScaleWeb Dictionaries. Paper presented at the Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2007. AINA ‘07. 21st International Conference on. 21-23 May 2007.
Nash, S. (2005). Learning objects, learning object repositories, and learning theory. Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisc. J. E-Learn. Objects 1(1), 217-228.
Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T. & Swartout, W. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI magazine, 12(3), 36.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. & Jamali, H. (2007). The use, users, and role of abstracts in the digital scholarly environment. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(4), 446- 453.
Nielsen, J. (1994a). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. Academic Press, Inc.
Nielsen, J. (1994b). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.
Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Recuperado de http://www.ingenieriasimple.com/usabilidad/IntroToUsability.pdf
Nielsen, J., Snyder, C., Molich, R. & Farrell, S. (2001). E-commerce user experience. Nielsen Norman Group.
Noik, E. (1993). Exploring large hyperdocuments: fisheye views of nested networks. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Hypertext, 192-205.
Norman, D. (2005). Human-centered design considered harmful. Interactions, 12(4), 14- 19.
Norman, D. (2008). Simplicity is not the answer. Interactions, 15(5), 45-46.
Ochoa, X., Cardinaels, K., Meire, M. & Duval, E. (2005). Frameworks for the automatic indexation of learning management systems content into learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005.
Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2006). Quality Metrics for learning object Metadata. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, 1 March 2006, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2008). Relevance ranking metrics for learning objects. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1), 34-48.
Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2009). Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 2(3), 226-238.
Pancheshnikov, Y. (2007). Integrating print and digital resources in library collections. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31(2), 111-112.
Park, J. (2005). Semantic interoperability across digital image collections: A pilot study on metadata mapping. Proceedings Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS).
Park, J. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 213-228.
Pastor, J. (2009). Diseño de un sistema colaborativo para la creación y gestión de tesauros en Internet basado en SKOS. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.
Perallos, A. (2007). Metodología ágil y adaptable al contexto para la evaluación integral y sistemática de la calidad de los sitios web. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, España.
Petrelli, D. (2008). On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.024
Pirolli, P., Card, S. & Van Der Wege, M. (2001). Visual information foraging in a focus+ context visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Plaisant, C., Grosjean, J. & Bederson, B. (2002). Spacetree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the INFOVIS 2002. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002, USA.
Polsani, P. (2006). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4).
Polson, P. & Lewis, C. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction, 5(2-3), 191-220.
Poole, A. & Ball, L. (2006). Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 211-219). Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.
Prabha, C. (2007). Shifting from print to electronic journals in ARL university libraries. Serials Review, 33(1), 4-13.
Pullan, M., Watson, M., Kennedy, J., Raguenaud, C. & Hyam, R. (2000). The Prometheus Taxonomic Model: a practical approach to representing multiple classifications. Taxon, 55-75.
Purday, J. (2009). Think culture: Europeana. Eu from concept to construction. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 919-937.
Qing, F. & Ruhua, H. (2008). Evaluating the usability of discipline repositories. Paper presented at the IT in Medicine and Education, 2008. ITME 2008. IEEE International Symposium on.
Reddy, M. & Wang, R. (1995). Estimating data accuracy in a federated database environment. In S. Bhalla (Ed.), Information Systems and Data Management, 1006, 115-134, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Rehak, D. & Mason, R. (2003). Keeping the learning in learning objects. Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning, 20-34.
Reilly, D. & Inkpen, K. (2007). White rooms and morphing don’t mix: setting and the evaluation of visualization techniques. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Ríos Hilario, A., Martín Campo, D. & Ferreras Fernández, T. (2012). Linked data y linked open data: su implantación en una biblioteca digital. El caso de Europeana. Recuperado de http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2012/mayo/10.html
Roberts, J. (1995). Faculty knowledge about library services at the University of the West Indies. New Library World, 96(2), 14-22.
Robertson, G., Mackinlay, J. & Card, S. (1991). Cone trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology.
Rosch, J.L. & Vogel-Walcutt, J.J. (2013). A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cognition, technology & work, 15(3), 313-327.
Ruecker, S. (2003). Affordances of prospect for academic users of interpretively-tagged text collections. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Ruecker, S., Radzikowska, M. & Sinclair, S. (2011). Visual interface design for digital cultural heritage: A guide to rich-prospect browsing. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Farnham, Surrey.
Russell, S., Norvig, P. & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 3rd edition.
Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2005). Normative specifications of learning objects and learning processes: towards higher levels of automation in standardized e- learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(3), 3-12.
Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Using an AGROVOC-based ontology for the description of learning resources on organic agriculture. Metadata and Semantic, pp. 481-492, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Santos, J., Ochoa, X., Parra, G. & Duval, E. (2011). La experiencia de ARIADNE: Creando una red de reutilización de objetos de aprendizaje a través de estándares y especificaciones. IEEE-RITA, 6(3), 112-117.
Sanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2009). A preliminary analysis of software engineering metrics-based criteria for the evaluation of learning objects reusability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 4(2009), 30- 34.
Sanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2011). Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability. Software Quality Journal, 19(1), 121-140.
Schaffert, S. & Geser, G. (2008). Open educational resources and practices. E-Learning Papers, 7, 1-10.
Schulz, H., Hadlak, S. & Schumann, H. (2011). Point-based visualization for large hierarchies. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(5), 598- 611.
Sebrechts, M., Cugini, J., Laskowski, S., Vasilakis, J. & Miller, M. (1999). Visualization of search results: a comparative evaluation of text, 2D, and 3D interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR con- ference on Research and development in information retrieval.
Shiri, A. (2008). Metadata-enhanced visual interfaces to digital libraries. Journal of Information Science, 34(6), 763-775.
Shiri, A. & Revie, C. (2005). Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface. Journal of documentation, 61(5), 640-656.
Shiri, A., Revie, C. & Chowdhury, G. (2002). Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces. Journal of Information Science, 28(2), 111-122.
Shiri, A., Ruecker, S., Doll, L., Bouchard, M. & Fiorentino, C. (2011). An evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced visual interfaces for multilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 236-243, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Shneiderman, B. (1992). Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG), 11(1), 92-99.
Shneiderman, B. (2003). Designing the user interface. Pearson Education India.
Shneiderman, B., Feldman, D., Rose, A. & Grau, X. F. (2000). Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, Rugensburg.
Shneiderman, B. & Johnson, B. (1991). Tree-maps: A space-Filling Approach to the Visualization of Hierarchical Information Structures. Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualization, pp. 175-282.
Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface 4th edition. Ed: Pearson Addison Wesley, USA.
Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2006). Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on Beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization.
Shreeves, S., Knutson, E., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C., Twidale, M. & Cole, T. (2005). Is ‘quality’ metadata ‘shareable’ metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) 12th National Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Shuler, J. (2007). Public Policies and Academic Libraries—The Shape of the Next Digital Divide. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(1), 141-143.
Shuling, W. (2007). Investigation and analysis of current use of electronic resources in university libraries. Library Management, 28(1/2), 72-88.
Sicilia, M. & Garcia, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
Sicilia, M., Sánchez, S. & Benito, M. (2006). Estado de la cuestión de los objetos y diseños para el aprendizaje y su uso. Technical report, REDAOPA Red Temática de Actividades y Objetos para el Aprendizaje.
Sifer, M. (2003). Exploring web site log data with a multi-classification interface. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.
Simkin, D. & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 454-
Smoot, M., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. & Ideker, T. (2011). Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics, 27(3), 431-432.
Soergel, D. (1995). The art and architecture thesaurus (AAT): A critical appraisal. Visual Resources, 10(4), 369-400.
Soler, C. & Gil, I. (2010). Possibilities and limitations of thesauri in comparison with other systems of knowledge organization: folksonomies, taxonomies and ontologies. Rev. Interam. Bibliot, 361-377.
Soto, C., Gordo, E. & Sánchez, S. (2007). Semantic learning object repositories. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 17(6), 432-446.
Spence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353-368.
Spence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 61-77.
Stace, C. (1991). Plant taxonomy and biosystematics (2nd edition ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stafford, A., Shiri, A., Ruecker, S., Bouchard, M., Mehta, P., Anvik, K. & Rossello, X. (2008). Searchling: user-centered evaluation of a visual thesaurus-enhanced interface for bilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 117-121, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M. & McDonald, K. (2000). An evaluation of space- filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 663-694.
Stawniak, M. (2012). Searching Content Related by Semantics, Space and Time. Interactive 3D Multimedia Content, pp. 223-251, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Stefaner, M., Dalla Vecchia, E., Condotta, M., Wolpers, M., Specht, M., Apelt, S. & Duval, E. (2007). MACE–enriching architectural learning objects for experience multiplication. Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, 4753, 322-336.
Stefaner, M. & Muller, B. (2007). Elastic lists for facet browsers. Paper presented at the Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2007. DEXA’07. 18th International Workshop on.
Stefaner, M., Wolpers, M., Memmel, M., Duval, E., Specht, M., Börner, D. & Klemke, R. (2009). MACE: Joint Deliverable “Evaluation of the MACE system”. The MACE Consortium.
Stojanovic, L., Staab, S. & Studer, R. (2001). E-Learning based on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the WebNe001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Strauch, C., Sites, U. & Kriha, W. (2011). NoSQL databases. Recuperado de http://www. christof-strauch. de/nosqldbs.pdf
Strong, D., Lee, Y. & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110. doi: 10.1145/253769.253804
Stuckenschmidt, H., Vdovjak, R., Houben, G. & Broekstra, J. (2004). Index structures and algorithms for querying distributed RDF repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web.
Sutcliffe, A., Ennis, M. & Hu, J. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 741-763.
Swan, A. & Carr, L. (2008). Institutions, their repositories and the web. Serials Review, 34(1), 31-35.
Swan, R. & Allan, J. (1998). Aspect windows, 3-D visualizations, and indirect comparisons of information retrieval systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.
Tadapak, P., Suebchua, T. & Rungsawang, A. (2010). A machine learning based language specific web site crawler. Paper presented at the Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), 2010 13th International Conference on.
Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Paper presented at the Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington (2003).
Ternier, S., Verbert, K., Parra, G., Vandeputte, B., Klerkx, J., Duval, E. & Ochoa, X. (2009). The Ariadne Infrastructure for Managing and Storing Metadata. Internet Computing, IEEE, 13(4), 18-25. doi: 10.1109/mic.2009.90
Tilkov, S. & Vinoski, S. (2010). Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(6), 80-83.
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with computers, 13(2), 127-145.
Tripathy, A. & Patra, P. (2008). A web mining architectural model of distributed crawler for internet searches using pagerank algorithm. Paper presented at the Asia- Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2008. APSCC ‘08. IEEE.
Trust, J. (1988). Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT). Recuperado de http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/aat/about.html
Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 400-419.
Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2007). Critical constructs of digital library interaction. Paper presented at the 11th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, 18-20 May, Πάτρα (GR).
Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information processing & management, 44(3), 1234-1250.
Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Blocks, D. & Cunliffe, D. (2006). Query expansion via conceptual distance in thesaurus indexed collections. Journal of documentation, 62(4), 509-533.
Tunkelang, D. (2009). Faceted search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-80.
Uddin, M. & Janecek, P. (2007). Performance and usability testing of multidimensional taxonomy in web site search and navigation. Performance measurement and metrics, 8(1), 18-33.
Ur Rehman, S. & Ramzy, V. (2004). Awareness and use of electronic information resources at the health sciences center of Kuwait University. Library Review, 53(3), 150-156.
Valente, A. (2005). Types and roles of legal ontologies. Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval and Applications, pp. 65-76, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.
Vessey, I. & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Reseatch, 2(1), 63-84.
Von Landesberger, T., Kuijper, A., Schreck, T., Kohlhammer, J., Van Wijk, J., Fekete, J. & Fellner, D. (2011). Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum, Wiley, 30(6), 1719-1749. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01898.x (6)
Vora, P. (1998). Design/methods & tools: Designing for the web: a survey. Interac- tions, 5(3), 13-30.
W3C, H. (2013). The canvas element (Editor’s Draft 24 July 2013). Recuperado de http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-canvas-element.
Wang, R. & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33.
Wang, Z., Chaudhry, A. & Khoo, C. (2008). Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation. Journal of documentation, 64(6), 842-876.
Weinberg, B. (1995). Art & Architecture Thesaurus and Guide to Indexing and Cata- loging with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(2), 152-160.
Westerman, S. & Cribbin, T. (2000). Mapping semantic information in virtual space: dimensions, variance and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 765-787.
White, R., Kules, B. & Drucker, S. (2006). Supporting exploratory search, introduc- tion, special issue, communications of the ACM. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39.
White, R. & Roth, R. (2009). Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-98. doi: 10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003
Whitehall, T. (1992). Quality in library and information service: a review. Library Management, 13(5), 23-35.
Whitehall, T. (1995). Value in library and information management: a review. Library Management, 16(4), 3-11.
Wiley, D. (2002a). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy. In The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, Indiana, 2830(435), 3–24.
Wiley, D. (2002b). Instructional use of learning objects. Agency for Instructional Technology.
Wilkinson, L. & Wills, G. (2005). The grammar of graphics. Springer Science+ Business Media.
Wise, J. (1999). The ecological approach to text visualization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1224-1233.
Wittenburg, K., Das, D., Hill, W. & Stead, L. (1995). Group asynchronous browsing on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the 4th International WWW Conference, Boston (MA).
Wu, M., Fuller, M. & Wilkinson, R. (2001). Using clustering and classification approaches in interactive retrieval. Information processing & management, 37(3), 459- 484.
Ytow, N., Morse, D. & Roberts, D. (2001). Nomencurator: a nomenclatural history model to handle multiple taxonomic views. Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 73(1), 81-98.
Zhang, X., Liu, J., Li, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2009). How usable are operational digital libraries: a usability evaluation of system interactions. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIG- CHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems, pp. 177-186, ACM.
Zhong, Y., Luo, Y., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J. (1999). HICLAS: a taxonomic data- base system for displaying and comparing biological classification and phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 15(2), 149-156.
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/2/license_rdf
http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/3/license.txt
http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/1/Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas%20navegacionales.pdf
http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/4/Cubierta%20Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas.jpg
http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/5/Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas%20navegacionales.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
997daf6c648c962d566d7b082dac908d
91ea75a75ff48351f58d45c19140e353
0aed541417b911f486375aa5ead8d767
4572bb151b1666679e2f32ef58626924
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Distrital - RIUD
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@udistrital.edu.co
_version_ 1814111241930539008
spelling will be generated::orcid::0000-0002-8758-1412600will be generated::orcid::0000-0003-2422-90056002023-11-03T01:17:49Z2023-11-03T01:17:49Z2018-04978-958-787-004-6http://hdl.handle.net/11349/32620Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo CientíficoActualmente existen repositorios y bibliotecas digitales que dan acceso a miles de recursos cataloga dos y organizados de acuerdo a las descripciones de sus colecciones. Esta gran cantidad de recursos en su mayoría no tienen un alcance y/o visibilidad que permita ser consultados en su totalidad por los actuales métodos de búsquedas convencionales, como los son motores de búsquedas textuales. Bajo esta premisa, el presente libro plantea una serie de estrategias de búsqueda visuales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimiento (ontologías y tesauros), mediante el uso de inter faces navegacionales que permitan mejorar las condiciones actuales de acceso a la mayoría de estas colecciones de recursos digitales. Para ello se utilizarán principios de diseños centrado en usuario y aspectos relacionados con usabilidad, con el propósito de explorar posibles formas para desplegar información dentro de una colección de recursos digitales alojados en un repositorio, y analizar sus diferencias con el fin de llegar a conclusiones que permitan identificar ventajas y desventajas de cada una de ellas para su implementaciónCurrently there are repositories and digital libraries that give access to thousands of resources cataloged and organized according to the descriptions of their collections. Most of this large number of resources do not have a scope and/or visibility that allows them to be consulted in their entirety by current conventional search methods, such as textual search engines. Under this premise, this book proposes a series of visual search strategies based on knowledge representation schemes (ontologies and thesauri), through the use of navigational interfaces that allow improving the current conditions of access to the majority of these collections. of digital resources. To do this, user-centered design principles and aspects related to usability will be used, with the purpose of exploring possible ways to display information within a collection of digital resources hosted in a repository, and analyzing their differences in order to reach conclusions that allow you to identify advantages and disadvantages of each of them for their implementationBogotápdfEspaciosAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2OntologíasTesaurosInterfaces navegacionalesRecursos digitalesRepositorios digitalesBúsqueda visualWeb semánticaRepresentación del conocimiento (Teoría de la información)OntologiesThesauriNavigational InterfacesDigital ResourcesEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales a partir de esquemas de representación de conocimientoNavigational search environments based on knowledge representation schemes ​bookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33Agosti, M., Crivellari, F., Deambrosis, G., Ferro, N., Gäde, M., Petras, V. & Stiller, J. (2009). D2. 1.1–Report on User Preferences and Information Retrieval Scenarios for Multilingual Access in Europeana. EuropeanaConnect, ECP-2008-DILI- 528001. Recuperado de http://www.europeanaconnect.eu/documents/D2.1.1_eConnect_Report_User_Preferences_MLIA_v1.0_20091222.zipAgrovoc, 2017. Tesauro multilingüe de agricultura. Recuperado de http://aims.fao.org/es/agrovocAitchison, J., Gilchrist, A. & Bawden, D. (2001). Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual (7th ed). Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers,Aitta, M., Kaleva, S. & Kortelainen, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services. New Library World, 109(1/2), 25-45.Alva, M., Martínez, A., Suárez, M., Labra, J., Cueva, J. & Sagastegui, H. (2010). Towards the evaluation of usability in educative websites. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 145-161.Allan, J., Leuski, A., Swan, R. & Byrd, D. (2001). Evaluating combinations of ranked lists and visualizations of inter-document similarity. Information processing & management, 37(3), 435-458.Allen, R., Obry, P. & Littman, M. (1993). An interface for navigating clustered document sets returned by queries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems, Milpitas, California, United States.ANSI/NISO. (2005). ANSI/NISO Z39.19 Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. National Information Standards Organization (Estados Unidos): American National Standards InstituteArano, S. & Codina, L. (2004). La estructura conceptual de los tesauros en el entorno digital: nuevas esperanzas para viejos problemas. Jornades Catalanes d’Infornació i Documentació, 9, 14.Armstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R., Stoker, D., Thomas, R. & Urquhart, C. (2001). A study of the use of electronic information systems by higher education students in the UK. Program: electronic library and information systems, 35(3), 241-262.Aroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G., Kravcik, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M. & Wild, F. (2006). Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 4-18.Aula, A. & Käki, M. (2005). Less is more in Web search interfaces for older adults. First Monday, 10(7-4).Baeza, R. & Castillo, C. (2004). Crawling the infinite Web: five levels are enough. Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph, 3243, 156-167.Baker, K. (2006). Learning objects and process interoperability. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 167-172.Barton, J., Currier, S. & Hey, J. (2003). Building quality assurance into metadata creation: an analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice. Paper presented at the Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications, September 28 - October 2 (2003), Seattle, Washington, USA.Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R. & Tollis, I. (1998). Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice Hall PTR.Bederson, B., Shneiderman, B. & Wattenberg, M. (2002). Ordered and Quantum Treemaps: Making Effective Use of 2D Space to Display Hierarchies. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 21(4), 833-854.Benford, S., Snowdon, D., Greenhalgh, C., Ingram, R., Knox, I. & Brown, C. (1995). VR- VIBE: A Virtual Environment for Co-operative Information Re- trieval. Computer Graphics Forum, 14(3), 349-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.1995.cgf143_0349.xBevan, N. & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(1-2), 132-145.Bizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1-22.Blanch, R. & Lecolinet, E. (2007). Browsing Zoomable Treemaps: Structure-Aware Multi- Scale Navigation Techniques. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1248-1253. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2007.70540Blocks, D., Binding, C., Cunliffe, D. & Tudhope, D. (2002). Qualitative evaluation of thesaurus-based retrieval. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 346-361, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Boldi, P., Codenotti, B., Santini, M. & Vigna, S. (2004). Ubicrawler: A scalable fully distributed web crawler. Software: Practice and Experience, 34(8), 711-726.Booth, P. (1989). An introduction to human-computer interaction. London, UK: Psychology Press.Boren, T. & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), 261-278.Bostock, M. & Heer, J. (2009). Protovis: A graphical toolkit for visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6), 1121-1128.Boulos, M., Warren, J., Gong, J. & Yue, P. (2010). Web GIS in practice VIII: HTML5 and the canvas element for interactive online mapping. International journal of health geographics, 9(1), 14.Brachman, R. & Schmolze, J. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive science, 9(2), 171-216.Bremm, S., Von Landesberger, T., Hess, M., Schreck, T., Weil, P. & Hamacherk, K. (2011). Interactive visual comparison of multiple trees. Paper presented at the VAST 2011 - IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2011, Proceedings, 31-40. doi:10.1109/VAST.2011.6102439Bruce, T. & Hillmann, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. Chicago, IL: D.Hillman & E.Westbrooks (Eds.).Bruno, D. & Richmond, H. (2003). The truth about taxonomies. Information management journal, 37(2), 48-52.Buchanan, S. & Salako, A. (2009). Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a digital library. Library Review, 58(9), 638-651.Bui, Y. & Park, J. (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. H. Moukdad (ed.) Proceedings of CAIS/ ACSI 2006 Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation, 13.Buttenfield, B. (1999). Usability evaluation of digital libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17(3-4), 39-59.Card, S., Mackinlay, J. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.146Castells, L. (2007). Los protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta como instrumento para analizar el proceso de escritura. Revista española de lingüística aplicada (20), 27- 36.Castells, P. (2002). Aplicación de técnicas de la web semántica. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Castillo, C. (2005). Effective web crawling. ACM Transactions on Computer Graphic, 39, 55-56.Castillo, L. (2006). Elaboración de un tesauro de información de actualidad y conversión en red semántica para su empleo en un sistema de recuperación periodístico. Universidad de Valencia: Valencia.Cavieres Abarca, A., Fredes Mena, S. & Ramírez Novoa, A. (2010). Tesauros y web semántica: diseño metodológico para estructurar contenidos web mediante SKOS-Core. Serie bibliotecología y gestión de información, (57), 1-64.Cechinel, C., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Empirical analysis of errors on humangenerated learning objects metadata. Proceedings Metadata and Semantic Research Third International Conference, Milan, Italy, pp. 60-70.Cechinel, C., Silva, S., Ochoa, X., Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2012). Populating Learning Object Repositories with Hidden Internal Quality Information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (RecSysTEL 2012). Manouselis, N., Draschler, H., Verber, K., and Santos, OC (Eds.). Published by CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Centelles, M. (2005). Taxonomías para la categorización y la organización de la información en sitios web. Hipertext.net.Cervera, J., López, M., Fernández, C. & Sánchez, S. (2009). Quality metrics in learning objects. Metadata and Semantics, 135-141.Cleveland, W. (1984). Graphs in scientific publications. Amer. Stat., 38(4).Cleveland, W., Diaconis, P. & McGill, R. (1982). Variables on scatterplots look more highly correlated when the scales are increased. Defense Technical Information Center.Clyphan, R. & Sugimoto. (2009). Europeana Semantic Element ESE v3.4.1. Recuperado de http://pro.europeana.eu/web/guest/technical-requirements/.Cockburn, A. & McKenzie, B. (2000). An evaluation of cone trees. People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else. British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 425-436, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Codina, L. (2000). Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos. Revista española de documentación científica, 23(1), 9-44.Corcho, O., Fernández, M. & Gómez, A. (2003). Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data & knowledge engineering, 46(1), 41-64.Crockford, D. (2006). The application/json media type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).Cugini, J., Laskowski, S. & Sebrechts, M. (2000). Presenting search results: design, visualization and evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Information Doors. Where Information Search and Hypertext Link Workshop.Chen, C. (2004). Information visualization: Beyond the horizon. Springer, 2(16), 316.Chirita, P., Gavriloaie, R., Ghita, S., Nejdl, W. & Paiu, R. (2005). Activity based metadata for semantic desktop search. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 439-454, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Chrysafiadi, K. & Virvou, M. (2013). A knowledge representation approach using fuzzy cognitive maps for better navigation support in an adaptive learning system. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 81.Chuanjun, S. (2004). On the Evaluation of the Quality of Digital Collections. The Journal of the Library Science in China, 4.Davis, P. & Connolly, M. (2007). Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non- use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4).Davis, R., Shrobe, H. & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a knowledge representation?. AI magazine, 14(1), 17.De la Prieta, F. & Gil, A. (2010). A multi-agent system that searches for learning objects in heterogeneous repositories. Trends in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 355-362.Design, P. (1998). Visual Thesaurus. Recuperado de http://www.visualthesaurus.comDietze, S., Yu, H., Giordano, D., Kaldoudi, E., Dovrolis, N. & Taibi, D. (2012). Linked Education: interlinking educational Resources and the Web of Data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.Dinkla, K., Westenberg, M., Timmerman, H., Van Hijum, S. & Van Wijk, J. (2011). Comparison of multiple weighted hierarchies: visual analytics for microbe community profiling. Computer Graphics Forum, 30, 1141-1150.Dix, A., Janet, E., Abowd, G. & Beale, R. (2003). Human computer interaction. NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C. & Van de Sompel, H. (2010). The Europeana Data Model (EDM). Paper presented at the Proceedings of IFLA, Gothenburg, Sweden.Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.Draper, G., Livnat, Y. & Riesenfeld, R. (2009). A Survey of Radial Methods for Information Visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(5), 759-776. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.23Dumas, J. & Redish, J. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. England: Intellect.Duncan, S. (2009). Patterns of learning object reuse in the Connexions repository. Tesis doctoral. Utah State University, Logan, USA.Durkin, J. (1994). Expert systems: design and development. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.Eades, P. & Sugiyama, K. (1990). How to Draw a Directed Graph J. Information Processing, 13(4), pp. 424-434.Edwards, J., McCurley, K. & Tomlin, J. (2001). An adaptive model for optimizing performance of an incremental web crawler. WWW Conference, Hong Kong, China.English, J., Hearst, M., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K. & Lee, K. (2002). Flexible search and navigation using faceted metadata. Technical report, University of Berkeley, School of Information Management and Systems, 2003. Submitted for publication. Europeana, 2017. Europeana REST API. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana. eu/api/introduction.Europeana. (2017b). Europeana Linked Open Data. Recuperado de http://labs.europeana.eu/api/linked-open-data-introduction.Fang, X. & Holsapple, C. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 476-491.Fekete, J. (2004). The infovis toolkit. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.Fekete, J., Hémery, P., Baudel, T. & Wood, J. (2011). Obvious: A meta-toolkit to encapsulate information visualization toolkits—one toolkit to bind them all. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on.Fernández, A. (2011). La construcción de tesauros académicos: un modelo general y un método inductivo con aplicación al “e-learning”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.Fernández, J. (2001). Modelos de Recuperación de Información basados en Redes de Creencia. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada, España.Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. & Antoniou, G. (2003). Describing knowledge representation schemes: A formal account. Technical Rep. No. TR-320, Institute of Computer Science—Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (ICS-FORTH), Crete, Greece.Foltz, M. (1997). An information space design rationale.Fox, E., Gonçalves, M. & Kipp, N. (2002). Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Digital libraries, pp. 623-641, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Fox, E., Hix, D., Nowell, L., Brueni, D., Wake, W., Heath, L. & Rao, D. (1999). Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(8), 480-491.Fox, E. & Logan, E. (2005). An Asian digital libraries perspective. Information processing & management, 41(1), 1-4.Friesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects?. Interactive learning environments, 9(3), 219-230.Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. & Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Fulton, S. & Fulton, J. (2013). HTML5 Canvas: O’Reilly Media. Furnas, G. (1986). Generalized fisheye views (Vol. 17): ACM.Furnas, G. & Zacks, J. (1994). Multitrees: enriching and reusing hierarchical structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Gaona-García, P., Martín, D., Fermoso, A. & Sánchez, S. (2014). A usability study of taxonomy-visualization user interfaces in digital repositories. Journal Online Information review, 38(2).Gaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Gaona, E. (2013). Prototipo informático para extracción de recursos digitales sobre internet. Revista Tecnura, 17, 79-92.Gaona-García, P., Sánchez, S. & Montenegro, C. (2014). Visualization of information: a proposal to improve the search and access to digital resources in repositories. Ingeniería e investigación, 34(1), 83-89.Gaona-García, P., Fermoso-García, A. & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2017). Exploring the Relevance of Europeana Digital Resources: Preliminary Ideas on Europeana Metadata Quality/Exploración de la relevancia de los recursos digitales de Eu- ropeana: ideas preliminares sobre la calidad de los metadatos Europeana. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 40(1), 59.Gašević, D., Djurić, D. & Devedzic, V. (2009). Model driven engineering and ontology development. Springerverlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Gašević, D. & Hatala, M. (2006). Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 375-389.Genesereth, M. & Ketchpel, S. (1994). Software agents. Commun. ACM, 37(7), 48-53, 147.Gero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI magazine, 11(4), 26.Gilchrist, A. (2003). Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies–an etymological note. Journal of documentation, 59(1), 7-18Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D. & Roberts, J. C. (2011). Visual comparison for information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 289-309.Gonçalves, M., Moreira, B., Fox, E. & Watson, L. (2007). What is a good digital library? – A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1416-1437. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.010.González, V. & Kobsa, A. (2003). Benefits of information visualization systems for administrative data analysts. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.Graham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2005). Extending taxonomic visualisation to incorporate synonymy and structural markers. Information Visualization, 4(3), 206-223.Graham, M. & Kennedy, J. (2010). A survey of multiple tree visualisation. Information Visualization, 9(4), 235-252.Graham, M., Kennedy, J. & Benyon, D. (2000). Towards a methodology for developing visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 789- 807.Granollers, T. (2004). MPIu+ a. Una metodología que integra la Ingeniería del Software, la Interacción Persona-Ordenador y la Accesibilidad en el contexto de equipos de desarrollo multidisciplinares. Tesis doctoral. Universitat de Lleida, España.Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.Guarino, N. & Poli, R. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(5), 625-640.Guha, R., McCool, R. & Miller, E. (2003). Semantic search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web.Harger, J. & Crossno, P. (2012). Comparison of open-source visual analytics toolkits. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis.Hargittai, E. (2004). Classifying and coding online actions. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 210-227.Hartson, H., Shivakumar, P. & Pérez, M. (2004). Usability inspection of digital libraries: a case study. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4(2), 108-123.Haslhofer, B., & Isaac, A. (2011). Data Europeana. EU: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 21 - 23 September 2011, The Hague, Netherlands.Hassan, Y., Martín, F. & Iazza, G. (2004). Diseño web centrado en el usuario: usabilidad y arquitectura de la información. Hipertext.net (2).Hayati, Z. & Jowkar, T. (2008). Adoption of electronic reference materials in academic libraries of Iran. The International Information & Library Review, 40(1), 52-63.Herman, I., Melancon, G. & Marshall, M. S. (2000). Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 6(1), 24-43. doi: 10.1109/2945.841119Hearst, M. (1995). TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Hearst, M. (2009). Search user interfaces. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Hearst, M. & Karadi, C. (1997). Cat-a-Cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. Paper presented at the ACM SIGIR Forum.Heer, J. & Bostock, M. (2010). Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 203-212.Heer, J., Card, S. & Landay, J. (2005). Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Heer, J., Kong, N. & Agrawala, M. (2009). Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Hemmje, M., Kunkel, C. & Willett, A. (1994). LyberWorld, a visualization user interface supporting fulltext retrieval. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.Hetzler, E. & Turner, A. (2004). Analysis experiences using information visualization. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 24(5), 22-26.Hitchcock, S., Woukeu, A., Brody, T., Carr, L., Hall, W. & Harnad, S. (2003). Evaluating Citebase, an open access Web-based citation-ranked search and impact discovery service. Monograph (Technical Report), University of Southampton, England.Hodgins, W. & Conner, M. (2000). Everything you ever wanted to know about learning standards but were afraid to ask. Learning in the New Economy e-Magazine (Line Zine).Hoffman, P., Grinstein, G., Marx, K., Grosse, I. & Stanley, E. (1997). DNA visual and analytic data mining. Paper presented at the Visualization 97´, Proceedings.Holzschuher, F. & Peinl, R. (2013). Performance of graph query languages: comparison of cypher, gremlin and native access in Neo4j. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops.Howland, J., Jonassen, D. & Marra, R. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Pearson Upper Saddle River, NJ.Huang, M., Liang, J. & Nguyen, Q. (2008). A Usability Study on the Use of Multi-Context Visualization. Paper presented at the CGIV ‘08. Fifth International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, 26-28 Aug. 2008.Hughes, B. (2005). Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the open language archives community. Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross- Fertilization, 135-148.ISO. (1985). ISO 5964-1985. Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/standard/12159.htmlISO. (1998). ISO 9241 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11. Guidance on Usability. Recuperado de https://www.iso.org/ standard/16883.htmlISO. (2001). ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use.Jacob, R. & Karn, K. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 4.Jain, P. & Babbar, P. (2006). Digital libraries initiatives in India. The International Information & Library Review, 38(3), 161-169.Jeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri, 55(2-3), 96-121.Jeng, J. (2009). What should we take into consideration when we talk about usability? Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (eds.) Evaluation of digital libraries. An insight into useful applications and methods. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp. 63–73Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Knight, C. & Richards, G. (2007). Ontologies for effective use of context in e-learning settings. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 47- 59.Kani, E., Ghinea, G. & Chen, S. Y. (2006). Digital libraries: what do users want? Online Information Review, 30(4), 395-412.Keim, D., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J. & Schreck, T. (2006). Monitoring network traffic with radial traffic analyzer. Paper presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2006 IEEE Symposium On.Kelty, C., Burrus, C. & Baraniuk, R. (2008). Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 1000-1011.Khoo, M., Kusunoki, D. & MacDonald, C. (2012). Finding Problems: When Digital Library Users Act as Usability Evaluators. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, 4-7 Jan. 2012.Kim, H. & Kim, Y. (2008). Usability study of digital institutional repositories. Electronic Library, The, 26(6), 863-881.Klerkx, J., Duval, E. & Meire, M. (2004). Using information visualization for accessing learning object repositories. 2004. IV 2004. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, London, 465-470. doi: 10.1109/ iv.2004.1320185Klerkx, J., Meire, M., Ternier, S., Verbert, K. & Duval, E. (2005). Information visualisation: towards an extensible framework for accessing learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications.Kobsa, A. (2004). User experiments with tree visualization systems. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on.Komlodi, A., Marchionini, G. & Soergel, D. (2007). Search history support for finding and using information: User interface design recommendations from a user study. Information Processing & Management, 43(1), 10-29. doi: 10.1016/j. ipm.2006.05.017Kruskal, J. & Landwehr, J. (1983). Icicle plots: Better displays for hierarchical clustering. The American Statistician, 37(2), 162-168.Kumar, V., Nesbit, J. & Han, K. (2005). Rating learning object quality with distributed bayesian belief networks: The why and the how. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on.Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Johnston, P., Nelson, M., Sanderson, R. & Warner, S. (2007). Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE). Technical report, Open Archives Initiative.Lamping, J., Rao, R. & Pirolli, P. (1995). A focus+ context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Lamping, L. & Rao, R. (1996). The Hyperbolic Browser: A Focus+Context Technique for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7(1), pp. 33-55.Lee, M., Reilly, R. & Butavicius, M. (2003). An empirical evaluation of Chernoff faces, star glyphs, and spatial visualizations for binary data. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.Lee, M. & Vickers, D. (1998). Psychological approaches to data visualisation: DTIC Document. Departament of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Australia.Lei, M. (2008). Knowledge organization systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 35(2- 3), 160-182.Lewis, C. (1982). Using the” thinking-aloud” method in cognitive interface design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center.Li, J., Gasevic, D., Nesbit, J. & Richards, G. (2005). Ontology Mappings Enable Interoperation of Knowledge Domain Taxonomies. Paper presented at the 2nd LORNET international annual conference.Lidwell, W., Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2010). Universal Principles of Design. 125 Ways to Enhance Usability, Influence Perception, Increase Appeal, Make Better Design Decisions, and Tech Through Design [25 Additional Design Principles]: Rockport publishers.Liew, C. & Foo, S. (1999). Derivation of interaction environment and information object properties for enhanced integrated access and value-adding to electronic documents. Paper presented at the Aslib Proceedings.Lin, X. (1997). Map displays for information retrieval. JASIS, 48(1), 40-54.Lin, Y., Ahn, J., Brusilovsky, P., He, D. & Real, W. (2010). Imagesieve: Exploratory search of museum archives with named entity-based faceted browsing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701217Lindberg, D., Humphreys, B. & McCray, A. (1993). The Unified Medical Language System. Methods of information in medicine, 32(4), 281.Livnat, Y., Agutter, J., Moon, S., Erbacher, R. & Foresti, S. (2005). A visualization paradigm for network intrusion detection. Paper presented at the Information Assuran- ce Workshop, 2005. IAW’05. Proceedings from the Sixth Annual IEEE SMC.Longmire, W. (2000). A primer on learning objects. Learning Circuits, 1(3).Lytras, M. & Sicilia, M. (2007). Where is the value in metadata? International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(4), 235-241.Mackinlay, J. (1991). Search architectures for the automatic design of graphical presentations. ACM Press, New York, 281-292.Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P. & Stolte, C. (2007). Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6), 1137-1144.Mangold, C. (2007). A survey and classification of semantic search approaches. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(1), 23-34.Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University PressMarchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. USA: Cambridge University PressMarchionini, G. (2008). Human–information interaction research and development. Library & amp; Information Science Research, 30(3), 165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2008.07.001Marchionini, G. & White, R. (2010). Find what you need, understand what you find. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 23(3), 205-237.Margaryan, A. & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Repositories and communities at cross-purposes: issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources. 24, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00267.x (4)Martín-Moncunill, D., Sánchez, S., Gaona, P. & Marianos, N. (2013). Applying visualization techniques to develop interfaces for educational repositories: the case of Organic. Lingua and VOA3R. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Learning Innova- tions and Quality: The Future of Digital Resources, Rome.McGreal, R. (2008). A typology of learning object repositories. Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, 5-28.McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R. & Cunningham, S. (2004). Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(4), 283-297.Merčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2009). Visualizing FRBR. Libraries in the Digital Age, LIDA 2009, 25-30 May, Dubrovnik and Zadar Croatia, 209-215.Merčun, T. & Žumer, M. (2010). Visualizing for explorations and discovery. Paper presented at the Proc. of the conf. on Libraries in the Digital Age, Zadar, Croatia.Merčun, T., Žumer, M. & Aalberg, T. (2012). FrbrVis: An Information Visualization Approach to Presenting FRBR Work Families Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. In P. Zaphiris, G. Buchanan, E. Rasmussen & F. Loizides (eds.), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Vol. 7489, pp. 504-507, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Miles, A., Matthews, B., Wilson, M. & Brickley, D. (2005). SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web. Paper presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications “Metadata Vocabularies in Practice”, 12-15 September 2005, Leganés - Madrid, Spain.Mizoguchi, R., Vanwelkenhuysen, J. & Ikeda, M. (1995). Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building & Knowledge Sharing, 46-57.Moen, W., Stewart, E. & McClure, C. (1997). The role of content analysis in evaluating metadata for the us government information locator service (gils): results from an explora- tory study. GILSMDContentAnalysis.htm.Mora, M. (2004). Interacción en interfaces de recuperación de información: conceptos, metáforas y visualización. Gijón: Trea.Morante, M. (2003). Usability guidelines for taxonomy development. Montague Institue Recuperado de http://www.montague.com/abstracts/usability.htmlMuelder, C. & Ma, K. (2008). A treemap based method for rapid layout of large graphs. Paper presented at the Visualization Symposium, 2008. PacificVIS ‘08. IEEE Pacific, Tokio.Muñoz, J., Calvillo, E., Ochoa, C., Santaolaya, R. & Álvarez, F. (2010). Use of Agents to Realize a Federated Searching of Learning Objects. Trends in Practical Applica- tions of Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1-8.Nakayama, K., Hara, T. & Nishio, S. (2007,). A Thesaurus Construction Method from Large ScaleWeb Dictionaries. Paper presented at the Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2007. AINA ‘07. 21st International Conference on. 21-23 May 2007.Nash, S. (2005). Learning objects, learning object repositories, and learning theory. Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisc. J. E-Learn. Objects 1(1), 217-228.Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T. & Swartout, W. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI magazine, 12(3), 36.Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. & Jamali, H. (2007). The use, users, and role of abstracts in the digital scholarly environment. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(4), 446- 453.Nielsen, J. (1994a). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. Academic Press, Inc.Nielsen, J. (1994b). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Recuperado de http://www.ingenieriasimple.com/usabilidad/IntroToUsability.pdfNielsen, J., Snyder, C., Molich, R. & Farrell, S. (2001). E-commerce user experience. Nielsen Norman Group.Noik, E. (1993). Exploring large hyperdocuments: fisheye views of nested networks. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Hypertext, 192-205.Norman, D. (2005). Human-centered design considered harmful. Interactions, 12(4), 14- 19.Norman, D. (2008). Simplicity is not the answer. Interactions, 15(5), 45-46.Ochoa, X., Cardinaels, K., Meire, M. & Duval, E. (2005). Frameworks for the automatic indexation of learning management systems content into learning object repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005.Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2006). Quality Metrics for learning object Metadata. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, 1 March 2006, Orlando, Florida, USA.Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2008). Relevance ranking metrics for learning objects. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1), 34-48.Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2009). Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 2(3), 226-238.Pancheshnikov, Y. (2007). Integrating print and digital resources in library collections. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31(2), 111-112.Park, J. (2005). Semantic interoperability across digital image collections: A pilot study on metadata mapping. Proceedings Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS).Park, J. (2009). Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 213-228.Pastor, J. (2009). Diseño de un sistema colaborativo para la creación y gestión de tesauros en Internet basado en SKOS. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.Perallos, A. (2007). Metodología ágil y adaptable al contexto para la evaluación integral y sistemática de la calidad de los sitios web. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, España.Petrelli, D. (2008). On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.024Pirolli, P., Card, S. & Van Der Wege, M. (2001). Visual information foraging in a focus+ context visualization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Plaisant, C., Grosjean, J. & Bederson, B. (2002). Spacetree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the INFOVIS 2002. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002, USA.Polsani, P. (2006). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4).Polson, P. & Lewis, C. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction, 5(2-3), 191-220.Poole, A. & Ball, L. (2006). Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 211-219). Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.Prabha, C. (2007). Shifting from print to electronic journals in ARL university libraries. Serials Review, 33(1), 4-13.Pullan, M., Watson, M., Kennedy, J., Raguenaud, C. & Hyam, R. (2000). The Prometheus Taxonomic Model: a practical approach to representing multiple classifications. Taxon, 55-75.Purday, J. (2009). Think culture: Europeana. Eu from concept to construction. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 919-937.Qing, F. & Ruhua, H. (2008). Evaluating the usability of discipline repositories. Paper presented at the IT in Medicine and Education, 2008. ITME 2008. IEEE International Symposium on.Reddy, M. & Wang, R. (1995). Estimating data accuracy in a federated database environment. In S. Bhalla (Ed.), Information Systems and Data Management, 1006, 115-134, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Rehak, D. & Mason, R. (2003). Keeping the learning in learning objects. Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning, 20-34.Reilly, D. & Inkpen, K. (2007). White rooms and morphing don’t mix: setting and the evaluation of visualization techniques. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Ríos Hilario, A., Martín Campo, D. & Ferreras Fernández, T. (2012). Linked data y linked open data: su implantación en una biblioteca digital. El caso de Europeana. Recuperado de http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2012/mayo/10.htmlRoberts, J. (1995). Faculty knowledge about library services at the University of the West Indies. New Library World, 96(2), 14-22.Robertson, G., Mackinlay, J. & Card, S. (1991). Cone trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology.Rosch, J.L. & Vogel-Walcutt, J.J. (2013). A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cognition, technology & work, 15(3), 313-327.Ruecker, S. (2003). Affordances of prospect for academic users of interpretively-tagged text collections. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Ruecker, S., Radzikowska, M. & Sinclair, S. (2011). Visual interface design for digital cultural heritage: A guide to rich-prospect browsing. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Farnham, Surrey.Russell, S., Norvig, P. & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 3rd edition.Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2005). Normative specifications of learning objects and learning processes: towards higher levels of automation in standardized e- learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(3), 3-12.Sánchez, S. & Sicilia, M. (2009). Using an AGROVOC-based ontology for the description of learning resources on organic agriculture. Metadata and Semantic, pp. 481-492, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Santos, J., Ochoa, X., Parra, G. & Duval, E. (2011). La experiencia de ARIADNE: Creando una red de reutilización de objetos de aprendizaje a través de estándares y especificaciones. IEEE-RITA, 6(3), 112-117.Sanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2009). A preliminary analysis of software engineering metrics-based criteria for the evaluation of learning objects reusability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 4(2009), 30- 34.Sanz, J., Dodero, J. & Sánchez, S. (2011). Metrics-based evaluation of learning object reusability. Software Quality Journal, 19(1), 121-140.Schaffert, S. & Geser, G. (2008). Open educational resources and practices. E-Learning Papers, 7, 1-10.Schulz, H., Hadlak, S. & Schumann, H. (2011). Point-based visualization for large hierarchies. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(5), 598- 611.Sebrechts, M., Cugini, J., Laskowski, S., Vasilakis, J. & Miller, M. (1999). Visualization of search results: a comparative evaluation of text, 2D, and 3D interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR con- ference on Research and development in information retrieval.Shiri, A. (2008). Metadata-enhanced visual interfaces to digital libraries. Journal of Information Science, 34(6), 763-775.Shiri, A. & Revie, C. (2005). Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface. Journal of documentation, 61(5), 640-656.Shiri, A., Revie, C. & Chowdhury, G. (2002). Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces. Journal of Information Science, 28(2), 111-122.Shiri, A., Ruecker, S., Doll, L., Bouchard, M. & Fiorentino, C. (2011). An evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced visual interfaces for multilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 236-243, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Shneiderman, B. (1992). Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG), 11(1), 92-99.Shneiderman, B. (2003). Designing the user interface. Pearson Education India.Shneiderman, B., Feldman, D., Rose, A. & Grau, X. F. (2000). Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, Rugensburg.Shneiderman, B. & Johnson, B. (1991). Tree-maps: A space-Filling Approach to the Visualization of Hierarchical Information Structures. Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualization, pp. 175-282.Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface 4th edition. Ed: Pearson Addison Wesley, USA.Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2006). Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on Beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization.Shreeves, S., Knutson, E., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C., Twidale, M. & Cole, T. (2005). Is ‘quality’ metadata ‘shareable’ metadata? The implications of local metadata practices for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) 12th National Conference. Minneapolis, MN.Shuler, J. (2007). Public Policies and Academic Libraries—The Shape of the Next Digital Divide. The journal of academic librarianship, 33(1), 141-143.Shuling, W. (2007). Investigation and analysis of current use of electronic resources in university libraries. Library Management, 28(1/2), 72-88.Sicilia, M. & Garcia, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).Sicilia, M., Sánchez, S. & Benito, M. (2006). Estado de la cuestión de los objetos y diseños para el aprendizaje y su uso. Technical report, REDAOPA Red Temática de Actividades y Objetos para el Aprendizaje.Sifer, M. (2003). Exploring web site log data with a multi-classification interface. Paper presented at the Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003. Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on.Simkin, D. & Hastie, R. (1987). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 454-Smoot, M., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. & Ideker, T. (2011). Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics, 27(3), 431-432.Soergel, D. (1995). The art and architecture thesaurus (AAT): A critical appraisal. Visual Resources, 10(4), 369-400.Soler, C. & Gil, I. (2010). Possibilities and limitations of thesauri in comparison with other systems of knowledge organization: folksonomies, taxonomies and ontologies. Rev. Interam. Bibliot, 361-377.Soto, C., Gordo, E. & Sánchez, S. (2007). Semantic learning object repositories. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 17(6), 432-446.Spence, I. (2005). No humble pie: The origins and usage of a statistical chart. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(4), 353-368.Spence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 61-77.Stace, C. (1991). Plant taxonomy and biosystematics (2nd edition ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.Stafford, A., Shiri, A., Ruecker, S., Bouchard, M., Mehta, P., Anvik, K. & Rossello, X. (2008). Searchling: user-centered evaluation of a visual thesaurus-enhanced interface for bilingual digital libraries. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, pp. 117-121, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M. & McDonald, K. (2000). An evaluation of space- filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 663-694.Stawniak, M. (2012). Searching Content Related by Semantics, Space and Time. Interactive 3D Multimedia Content, pp. 223-251, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Stefaner, M., Dalla Vecchia, E., Condotta, M., Wolpers, M., Specht, M., Apelt, S. & Duval, E. (2007). MACE–enriching architectural learning objects for experience multiplication. Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, 4753, 322-336.Stefaner, M. & Muller, B. (2007). Elastic lists for facet browsers. Paper presented at the Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2007. DEXA’07. 18th International Workshop on.Stefaner, M., Wolpers, M., Memmel, M., Duval, E., Specht, M., Börner, D. & Klemke, R. (2009). MACE: Joint Deliverable “Evaluation of the MACE system”. The MACE Consortium.Stojanovic, L., Staab, S. & Studer, R. (2001). E-Learning based on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the WebNe001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, Florida, USA.Strauch, C., Sites, U. & Kriha, W. (2011). NoSQL databases. Recuperado de http://www. christof-strauch. de/nosqldbs.pdfStrong, D., Lee, Y. & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110. doi: 10.1145/253769.253804Stuckenschmidt, H., Vdovjak, R., Houben, G. & Broekstra, J. (2004). Index structures and algorithms for querying distributed RDF repositories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web.Sutcliffe, A., Ennis, M. & Hu, J. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 741-763.Swan, A. & Carr, L. (2008). Institutions, their repositories and the web. Serials Review, 34(1), 31-35.Swan, R. & Allan, J. (1998). Aspect windows, 3-D visualizations, and indirect comparisons of information retrieval systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.Tadapak, P., Suebchua, T. & Rungsawang, A. (2010). A machine learning based language specific web site crawler. Paper presented at the Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), 2010 13th International Conference on.Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Paper presented at the Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington (2003).Ternier, S., Verbert, K., Parra, G., Vandeputte, B., Klerkx, J., Duval, E. & Ochoa, X. (2009). The Ariadne Infrastructure for Managing and Storing Metadata. Internet Computing, IEEE, 13(4), 18-25. doi: 10.1109/mic.2009.90Tilkov, S. & Vinoski, S. (2010). Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(6), 80-83.Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with computers, 13(2), 127-145.Tripathy, A. & Patra, P. (2008). A web mining architectural model of distributed crawler for internet searches using pagerank algorithm. Paper presented at the Asia- Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2008. APSCC ‘08. IEEE.Trust, J. (1988). Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT). Recuperado de http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/aat/about.htmlTsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 400-419.Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2007). Critical constructs of digital library interaction. Paper presented at the 11th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, 18-20 May, Πάτρα (GR).Tsakonas, G. & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information processing & management, 44(3), 1234-1250.Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Blocks, D. & Cunliffe, D. (2006). Query expansion via conceptual distance in thesaurus indexed collections. Journal of documentation, 62(4), 509-533.Tunkelang, D. (2009). Faceted search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-80.Uddin, M. & Janecek, P. (2007). Performance and usability testing of multidimensional taxonomy in web site search and navigation. Performance measurement and metrics, 8(1), 18-33.Ur Rehman, S. & Ramzy, V. (2004). Awareness and use of electronic information resources at the health sciences center of Kuwait University. Library Review, 53(3), 150-156.Valente, A. (2005). Types and roles of legal ontologies. Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval and Applications, pp. 65-76, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.Vessey, I. & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Reseatch, 2(1), 63-84.Von Landesberger, T., Kuijper, A., Schreck, T., Kohlhammer, J., Van Wijk, J., Fekete, J. & Fellner, D. (2011). Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum, Wiley, 30(6), 1719-1749. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01898.x (6)Vora, P. (1998). Design/methods & tools: Designing for the web: a survey. Interac- tions, 5(3), 13-30.W3C, H. (2013). The canvas element (Editor’s Draft 24 July 2013). Recuperado de http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-canvas-element.Wang, R. & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33.Wang, Z., Chaudhry, A. & Khoo, C. (2008). Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation. Journal of documentation, 64(6), 842-876.Weinberg, B. (1995). Art & Architecture Thesaurus and Guide to Indexing and Cata- loging with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(2), 152-160.Westerman, S. & Cribbin, T. (2000). Mapping semantic information in virtual space: dimensions, variance and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5), 765-787.White, R., Kules, B. & Drucker, S. (2006). Supporting exploratory search, introduc- tion, special issue, communications of the ACM. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39.White, R. & Roth, R. (2009). Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-98. doi: 10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003Whitehall, T. (1992). Quality in library and information service: a review. Library Management, 13(5), 23-35.Whitehall, T. (1995). Value in library and information management: a review. Library Management, 16(4), 3-11.Wiley, D. (2002a). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor and a taxonomy. In The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, Indiana, 2830(435), 3–24.Wiley, D. (2002b). Instructional use of learning objects. Agency for Instructional Technology.Wilkinson, L. & Wills, G. (2005). The grammar of graphics. Springer Science+ Business Media.Wise, J. (1999). The ecological approach to text visualization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1224-1233.Wittenburg, K., Das, D., Hill, W. & Stead, L. (1995). Group asynchronous browsing on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the 4th International WWW Conference, Boston (MA).Wu, M., Fuller, M. & Wilkinson, R. (2001). Using clustering and classification approaches in interactive retrieval. Information processing & management, 37(3), 459- 484.Ytow, N., Morse, D. & Roberts, D. (2001). Nomencurator: a nomenclatural history model to handle multiple taxonomic views. Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 73(1), 81-98.Zhang, X., Liu, J., Li, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2009). How usable are operational digital libraries: a usability evaluation of system interactions. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIG- CHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems, pp. 177-186, ACM.Zhong, Y., Luo, Y., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J. (1999). HICLAS: a taxonomic data- base system for displaying and comparing biological classification and phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 15(2), 149-156.Gaona Garcia, Paulo Alonso [0000-0002-8758-1412]Martín-Moncunil, David [0000-0003-2422-9005]Gaona Garcia, Paulo AlonsoMontenegro Marín, Carlos EnriqueMartín-Moncunil, DavidCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-87167http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/3/license.txt997daf6c648c962d566d7b082dac908dMD53open accessORIGINALEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales.pdfEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales.pdfapplication/pdf11704889http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/1/Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas%20navegacionales.pdf91ea75a75ff48351f58d45c19140e353MD51open accessTHUMBNAILCubierta Entornos de búsquedas.jpgCubierta Entornos de búsquedas.jpgimage/jpeg815268http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/4/Cubierta%20Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas.jpg0aed541417b911f486375aa5ead8d767MD54open accessEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales.pdf.jpgEntornos de búsquedas navegacionales.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg1002http://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/11349/32620/5/Entornos%20de%20b%c3%basquedas%20navegacionales.pdf.jpg4572bb151b1666679e2f32ef58626924MD55open access11349/32620oai:repository.udistrital.edu.co:11349/326202023-11-03 01:03:09.699open accessRepositorio Institucional Universidad Distrital - RIUDrepositorio@udistrital.edu.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

Publicaciones similares