Revisión sistemática sobre habilidades de pensamiento en el aula (2000-2013)

ABSTRACT: The present study summarizes the description of sexual dimorphism found on metric characteristics in a contemporary sample of skeletons. The burial individual record had data on sex, age, cause of death and birthplace. The metric information corresponding to 44 skull variables, jaw and lon...

Full description

Autores:
Villada Zapata, Johny Andrey
Chaves Castaño, Liliana
Jaramillo Ospina, Claudia
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/8750
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/8750
Palabra clave:
Aulas de clase
Habilidades de pensamiento
Pensamiento
Habilidades
Revisión bibliográfica
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: The present study summarizes the description of sexual dimorphism found on metric characteristics in a contemporary sample of skeletons. The burial individual record had data on sex, age, cause of death and birthplace. The metric information corresponding to 44 skull variables, jaw and long bones (humerus, fémur and tibia) was recorded on each subject. The sample consisted of 70 mature individuals of known sex (20 women and 50 males) from a cemetery of the city of Medellín, Colombia. When the statistical comparison between sexes was performed by means of a one-way F test only six of the studied variables were not significant (p > 0.05) to determine sex. In accord with these results, hierarchical list of variables for sex determination aim is proposed. Moreover, it has been conducted a discriminant analysis in order to obtaining prediction equations for sex. Tibia variables yield the highest total percentage of correct classification. They achieved also a higher classification percentage in men that in women, as it is in the qualitative analysis.Since the second half of the twentieth century, there has been a growing interest in the use of learning methods to assess and encourage the development of thinking skills in the classroom instead of the vertical transmission of a specific content. This study takes 60 academic articles published between 2000 and 2013 which had thinking skills as the central topic and analyzes their level of evidence and grade of recommendation following the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). The main findings were: most studies are developed with empirical analytical approaches and quasi-experimental designs; there are a variety of stimulation programs and data collection instruments that hinder a systematic analysis of programs; there are very different samples and intervened population used; and, finally, most studies are located at average levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.