Evaluación de la fricción en arcos ortodóncicos de acero inoxidable con y sin recubrimiento vítreo aplicado por el método sol-gel
ABSTRACT: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the static and dynamic frictional force generated between surfaces of metallic brackets and glass coated applied by the Sol-Gel method, and non coated wires. Methods: metallic brackets (0,018 x 0,025″), stainless steel wires (0,016 x 0,016″) an...
- Autores:
-
Montoya Góez, Yesid
Peláez Vargas, Alejandro
Jaramillo Vallejo, Pedro María
García García, Claudia
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/4967
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4967
- Palabra clave:
- Fricción
Brackets
Alambres de acero
Recubrimientos
Sol-Gel
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
Summary: | ABSTRACT: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the static and dynamic frictional force generated between surfaces of metallic brackets and glass coated applied by the Sol-Gel method, and non coated wires. Methods: metallic brackets (0,018 x 0,025″), stainless steel wires (0,016 x 0,016″) and elastic ligatures were used in all frictional tests. All components were characterized using SE M and optical microscopy. The frictional force was evaluated using a machine of tests Testresources® in dry environment. Results: the results showed that the stainless steel wires without modification (control group) showed the lowest values of static friction force followed by the stainless steel wires group coated by Sol-Gel method and the wires group with thermic treatment (thermic group). For dynamic friction force, the Sol-Gel group showed the smallest values, followed by the control group and the thermal group. Conclusion: the evaluated coating did not show a better frictional performance applied on stainless steel brackets in comparison with the control group. |
---|