Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods.: Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-...

Full description

Autores:
Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32978
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32978
Palabra clave:
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Vasos Retinianos
Retinal Vessels
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_e3738fc22b0170a60c06e55480b8fddc
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32978
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
spellingShingle Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Vasos Retinianos
Retinal Vessels
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
title_short Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_full Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_fullStr Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_full_unstemmed Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_sort Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Vasos Retinianos
Retinal Vessels
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
topic Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Vasos Retinianos
Retinal Vessels
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
description ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods.: Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. Results.: There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (κ = 0.65, κw [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (κ = 0.66, κw = 0.87), and SD and SF (κ = 0.62, κw = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The κ agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The κ agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The κ comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images. Conclusions.: Monoscopic photography can equal the reliability of stereo photography for full ETDRS DR severity scale grading.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T20:18:19Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T20:18:19Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0146-0404
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32978
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.09-4886
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1552-5783
identifier_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886.
0146-0404
10.1167/iovs.09-4886
1552-5783
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32978
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Informed
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv San Luis, Estados Unidos
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/2/license_rdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/3/license.txt
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/1/FlorezJose_2010_MonoscopicVersusStereoscopic.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
5281138bdbc3530442be7ddf62948a75
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173137805049856
spelling Flórez Arango, José FernandoLi, Helen K.Hubbard, Larry D.Danis, Ronald P.Esquivel, AdolKrupinski, Elizabeth A.2022-12-25T20:18:19Z2022-12-25T20:18:19Z2010Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886.0146-0404https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3297810.1167/iovs.09-48861552-5783ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods.: Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. Results.: There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (κ = 0.65, κw [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (κ = 0.66, κw = 0.87), and SD and SF (κ = 0.62, κw = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The κ agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The κ agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The κ comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images. Conclusions.: Monoscopic photography can equal the reliability of stereo photography for full ETDRS DR severity scale grading.COL00362129application/pdfengAssociation for Research in Vision and OphthalmologyInformedSan Luis, Estados Unidosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy SeverityAncianoAgedAnciano de 80 o más AñosAged, 80 and overRetinopatía DiabéticaDiabetic RetinopathyReproducibilidad de los ResultadosReproducibility of ResultsVasos RetinianosRetinal VesselsÍndice de Severidad de la EnfermedadSeverity of Illness IndexInvest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science31843192516CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8927https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/2/license_rdf1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53ORIGINALFlorezJose_2010_MonoscopicVersusStereoscopic.pdfFlorezJose_2010_MonoscopicVersusStereoscopic.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf445848https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32978/1/FlorezJose_2010_MonoscopicVersusStereoscopic.pdf5281138bdbc3530442be7ddf62948a75MD5110495/32978oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/329782022-12-25 15:26:35.22Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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