Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Retinal Photography for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods.: Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-...

Full description

Autores:
Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32978
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32978
Palabra clave:
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Vasos Retinianos
Retinal Vessels
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods.: Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. Results.: There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (κ = 0.65, κw [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (κ = 0.66, κw = 0.87), and SD and SF (κ = 0.62, κw = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The κ agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The κ agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The κ comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images. Conclusions.: Monoscopic photography can equal the reliability of stereo photography for full ETDRS DR severity scale grading.