Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for...
- Autores:
-
Palacio Barrera, Ana María
Gutiérrez López, Yessica
Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando
Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía
Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/10156
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156
- Palabra clave:
- Crioconservación
Cryoconservation
Exopolisacáridos
Expoloysaccharides
Liofilización
Freeze-drying
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id |
UDEA2_d8bf952f0e0ed62594ffa4dd775ad5b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/10156 |
network_acronym_str |
UDEA2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UdeA |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv |
Viabilidad de cepas de hongos Basidiomycetes bajo diferentes técnicas de conservación : procesos de crioconservación vs. liofilización |
title |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
spellingShingle |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes Crioconservación Cryoconservation Exopolisacáridos Expoloysaccharides Liofilización Freeze-drying |
title_short |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
title_full |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
title_fullStr |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
title_sort |
Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Palacio Barrera, Ana María Gutiérrez López, Yessica Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Palacio Barrera, Ana María Gutiérrez López, Yessica Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Crioconservación Cryoconservation Exopolisacáridos Expoloysaccharides Liofilización Freeze-drying |
topic |
Crioconservación Cryoconservation Exopolisacáridos Expoloysaccharides Liofilización Freeze-drying |
description |
ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for 12 months, recording their viability in order to establish the best conservation method. Growth kinetics, biomass, and polysaccharide production were studied. The conservation methods implemented included: distilled wáter at 24 ºC; sawdust and rice bran with 10% glicerol at -20 ºC, sawdustand rice bran with 10% glicerol at -80 ºC; and freeze-drying of biomass with trehalose or simmed milk. After conducting the analysis of the results after 12 months of conservation, we determined that the distilled water treatment at 24 ºC was the best conservation method with the highest percentage of recoverability, at 83.3% during the 12 month, followed by the cryoconservation treatment at 80º C, where 75% were recovered with no negative effects on biomass and polysaccharide production. The -20 ºC and freeze-drying treatments were not effective; with cryoconservation at -20 ºC treatment, strain recovery only occurred during the first month and with freeze-drying it was not possible to recover any strains during the entire 12-month period evaluated. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01T18:52:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01T18:52:38Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de investigación |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21. |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0304-3584 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2145-7166 |
identifier_str_mv |
Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21. 0304-3584 2145-7166 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
Actual. Biol. |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO) |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Instituto de Biología |
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv |
Biotecnología |
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Medellín, Colombia |
institution |
Universidad de Antioquia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/1/AtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdf http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/2/license_url http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/3/license_text http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/4/license_rdf http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/5/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
0912b393fab81af18c6f786c2295f7e6 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
andres.perez@udea.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812173204272185344 |
spelling |
Palacio Barrera, Ana MaríaGutiérrez López, YessicaRojas Vahos, Diego FernandoAtehortúa Garcés, LucíaZapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea2018-10-01T18:52:38Z2018-10-01T18:52:38Z2014Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21.0304-3584http://hdl.handle.net/10495/101562145-7166ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for 12 months, recording their viability in order to establish the best conservation method. Growth kinetics, biomass, and polysaccharide production were studied. The conservation methods implemented included: distilled wáter at 24 ºC; sawdust and rice bran with 10% glicerol at -20 ºC, sawdustand rice bran with 10% glicerol at -80 ºC; and freeze-drying of biomass with trehalose or simmed milk. After conducting the analysis of the results after 12 months of conservation, we determined that the distilled water treatment at 24 ºC was the best conservation method with the highest percentage of recoverability, at 83.3% during the 12 month, followed by the cryoconservation treatment at 80º C, where 75% were recovered with no negative effects on biomass and polysaccharide production. The -20 ºC and freeze-drying treatments were not effective; with cryoconservation at -20 ºC treatment, strain recovery only occurred during the first month and with freeze-drying it was not possible to recover any strains during the entire 12-month period evaluated.RESUMEN: Cuatro hongos basidiomycetes, Agaricus blazei (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W. Curt.: Fr.) P. Karsrt. y Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), y Pleurotus pulmonorius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetidae) fueron evaluados bajo tres métodos de conservación durante 12 meses, observando su viabilidad con el fin de establecer el mejor método de conservación. La cinética de crecimiento, producción de biomasa y polisacáridos fueron estudiados. Los métodos de conservación implementados incluyeron: agua destilada a 24 ºC; aserrín y salvado de arroz con glicerol 10% a -20 ºC; aserrín y salvado de arroz con glicerol 10% a -80 ºC y; liofilización de biomasa con trehalosa o leche desnatada. Luego de realizar el análisis de los resultados de 12 meses de conservación, se determinó que el tratamiento de agua destilada a 24 ºC fue el mejor método de conservación con el porcentaje de recuperabilidad más alto un 83, 3% en el mes 12, seguido por el tratamiento de criconservación a 80 º c donde se recuperó el 75%, sin afectar negativamente la producción de biomasa y polisacáridos. El tratamiento a -20º C y la liofilización no fueron efectivos; con la crionconservación a -20 ºC solo se recuperan cepas en el primer mes y con la liofilicazión no fue posible recuperar cepas en el periodo de 12 meses evaluado.application/pdfengUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Instituto de BiologíaBiotecnologíaMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/CrioconservaciónCryoconservationExopolisacáridosExpoloysaccharidesLiofilizaciónFreeze-dryingViability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processesViabilidad de cepas de hongos Basidiomycetes bajo diferentes técnicas de conservación : procesos de crioconservación vs. liofilizaciónActual. Biol.Actualidades Biológicas132136100ORIGINALAtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdfAtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf15151992http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/1/AtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdf0912b393fab81af18c6f786c2295f7e6MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfLicenciaapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5510495/10156oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/101562021-07-23 21:35:21.752Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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 |