Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes

ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for...

Full description

Autores:
Palacio Barrera, Ana María
Gutiérrez López, Yessica
Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando
Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía
Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2014
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/10156
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156
Palabra clave:
Crioconservación
Cryoconservation
Exopolisacáridos
Expoloysaccharides
Liofilización
Freeze-drying
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id UDEA2_d8bf952f0e0ed62594ffa4dd775ad5b9
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/10156
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv Viabilidad de cepas de hongos Basidiomycetes bajo diferentes técnicas de conservación : procesos de crioconservación vs. liofilización
title Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
spellingShingle Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
Crioconservación
Cryoconservation
Exopolisacáridos
Expoloysaccharides
Liofilización
Freeze-drying
title_short Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
title_full Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
title_fullStr Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
title_full_unstemmed Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
title_sort Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Palacio Barrera, Ana María
Gutiérrez López, Yessica
Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando
Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía
Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Palacio Barrera, Ana María
Gutiérrez López, Yessica
Rojas Vahos, Diego Fernando
Atehortúa Garcés, Lucía
Zapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Crioconservación
Cryoconservation
Exopolisacáridos
Expoloysaccharides
Liofilización
Freeze-drying
topic Crioconservación
Cryoconservation
Exopolisacáridos
Expoloysaccharides
Liofilización
Freeze-drying
description ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for 12 months, recording their viability in order to establish the best conservation method. Growth kinetics, biomass, and polysaccharide production were studied. The conservation methods implemented included: distilled wáter at 24 ºC; sawdust and rice bran with 10% glicerol at -20 ºC, sawdustand rice bran with 10% glicerol at -80 ºC; and freeze-drying of biomass with trehalose or simmed milk. After conducting the analysis of the results after 12 months of conservation, we determined that the distilled water treatment at 24 ºC was the best conservation method with the highest percentage of recoverability, at 83.3% during the 12 month, followed by the cryoconservation treatment at 80º C, where 75% were recovered with no negative effects on biomass and polysaccharide production. The -20 ºC and freeze-drying treatments were not effective; with cryoconservation at -20 ºC treatment, strain recovery only occurred during the first month and with freeze-drying it was not possible to recover any strains during the entire 12-month period evaluated.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01T18:52:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01T18:52:38Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0304-3584
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2145-7166
identifier_str_mv Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21.
0304-3584
2145-7166
url http://hdl.handle.net/10495/10156
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Actual. Biol.
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Instituto de Biología
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Biotecnología
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/1/AtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/2/license_url
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/3/license_text
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/4/license_rdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/5/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0912b393fab81af18c6f786c2295f7e6
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173204272185344
spelling Palacio Barrera, Ana MaríaGutiérrez López, YessicaRojas Vahos, Diego FernandoAtehortúa Garcés, LucíaZapata Ocampo, Paola Andrea2018-10-01T18:52:38Z2018-10-01T18:52:38Z2014Palacio A, Gutiérrez Y, Rojas D, Atehortúa L, Zapata P. Viability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods: Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processes. Actual. Biol. 2014;100(36):13-21.0304-3584http://hdl.handle.net/10495/101562145-7166ABSTRACT: Four basidiomycete fungi; Agaricus blazei Murrill (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst., Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr.) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), and Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetideae) were evaluated using three conservation methods for 12 months, recording their viability in order to establish the best conservation method. Growth kinetics, biomass, and polysaccharide production were studied. The conservation methods implemented included: distilled wáter at 24 ºC; sawdust and rice bran with 10% glicerol at -20 ºC, sawdustand rice bran with 10% glicerol at -80 ºC; and freeze-drying of biomass with trehalose or simmed milk. After conducting the analysis of the results after 12 months of conservation, we determined that the distilled water treatment at 24 ºC was the best conservation method with the highest percentage of recoverability, at 83.3% during the 12 month, followed by the cryoconservation treatment at 80º C, where 75% were recovered with no negative effects on biomass and polysaccharide production. The -20 ºC and freeze-drying treatments were not effective; with cryoconservation at -20 ºC treatment, strain recovery only occurred during the first month and with freeze-drying it was not possible to recover any strains during the entire 12-month period evaluated.RESUMEN: Cuatro hongos basidiomycetes, Agaricus blazei (Agaricomycetideae), Ganoderma lucidum (W. Curt.: Fr.) P. Karsrt. y Grifola frondosa (Dicks.: Fr) S.F. Gray (Higher Basidiomycetes), y Pleurotus pulmonorius (Fr.) Quél. (Agaricomycetidae) fueron evaluados bajo tres métodos de conservación durante 12 meses, observando su viabilidad con el fin de establecer el mejor método de conservación. La cinética de crecimiento, producción de biomasa y polisacáridos fueron estudiados. Los métodos de conservación implementados incluyeron: agua destilada a 24 ºC; aserrín y salvado de arroz con glicerol 10% a -20 ºC; aserrín y salvado de arroz con glicerol 10% a -80 ºC y; liofilización de biomasa con trehalosa o leche desnatada. Luego de realizar el análisis de los resultados de 12 meses de conservación, se determinó que el tratamiento de agua destilada a 24 ºC fue el mejor método de conservación con el porcentaje de recuperabilidad más alto un 83, 3% en el mes 12, seguido por el tratamiento de criconservación a 80 º c donde se recuperó el 75%, sin afectar negativamente la producción de biomasa y polisacáridos. El tratamiento a -20º C y la liofilización no fueron efectivos; con la crionconservación a -20 ºC solo se recuperan cepas en el primer mes y con la liofilicazión no fue posible recuperar cepas en el periodo de 12 meses evaluado.application/pdfengUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Instituto de BiologíaBiotecnologíaMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/CrioconservaciónCryoconservationExopolisacáridosExpoloysaccharidesLiofilizaciónFreeze-dryingViability of Basidiomycete fungal strains under different conservation methods : Crypreservation vs. freeze-drying processesViabilidad de cepas de hongos Basidiomycetes bajo diferentes técnicas de conservación : procesos de crioconservación vs. liofilizaciónActual. Biol.Actualidades Biológicas132136100ORIGINALAtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdfAtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf15151992http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/1/AtehortuaLucia_2014_BasidiomyceteDifferentMethods.pdf0912b393fab81af18c6f786c2295f7e6MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfLicenciaapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/10156/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5510495/10156oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/101562021-07-23 21:35:21.752Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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