Las tramas de un estudio cualitativo en salud mental y violencia política. Lecciones aprendidas

ABSTRACT: Describe methodological learning from a qualitative research about mental health and political violence with Colombian peasant communities from San Francisco, Colombia, in order to contribute to future explorations where ethics is relevant epistemological perspective in this field. Methodo...

Full description

Autores:
Arias López, Beatriz Elena
Tipo de recurso:
Review article
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/4510
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4510
Palabra clave:
Salud mental
Violencia política
Investigación cualitativa
Ética en investigación
Etnografía
Relatos de vida
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: Describe methodological learning from a qualitative research about mental health and political violence with Colombian peasant communities from San Francisco, Colombia, in order to contribute to future explorations where ethics is relevant epistemological perspective in this field. Methodology: A comparison was performed between initial methodological design with the settings and methodological decisions resulting from the study development and other associated dynamics. Results: Comparison between initial design and adjustments and progressive changes identifies the qualitative research methodological design like a process that moves from an imagined research into a embodied research derived from interaction between subjects. Research about mental health and political violence allows knowing this flexible nature related to key ethics elements for methodological decisions as place of the researcher and the participants, legitimacy of facilitators, co-production of knowledge and unconventional research strategies. Conclusion: Partiality of knowledge in qualitative research, the involvement of subjects and design flexibility are not deny their trustworthiness. On contrary, these features guarantee a process that transcends the uncritical adherence to methods.