Incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a developing country: Where is the difference?

ABSTRACT: Background Latin America exhibits a wide range of differences, compared to developed nations, in genetic background, health services, and clinical research development. It is valid to hypothesize that the incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in our setting m...

Full description

Autores:
Jaimes Barragán, Fabian Alberto
De La Rosa Echávez, Gisela Del Carmen
Gómez Vásquez, Emiliano
Múnera, Paola
Ramírez Rivera, Jaime
Castrillón, Sebastián
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2007
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/29713
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/29713
Palabra clave:
Neumonía
Pneumonia
Factores de Riesgo
Factores de Riesgo
Risk Factors
Epidemiología
Epidemiology
Estudios prospectivos
Prospective Studies
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Intensive Care Units
Incidencia
Incidence
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: Background Latin America exhibits a wide range of differences, compared to developed nations, in genetic background, health services, and clinical research development. It is valid to hypothesize that the incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in our setting may be substantially different of those reported elsewhere. We conducted a study to determine the incidence and risk factors for VAP in a University Hospital from Medellin, Colombia. Methods Prospective cohort study in three intensive care units (ICU) (surgical/trauma, medical, cardiovascular) in a 550-bed University Hospital. Critically ill patients (n=270) who required at least 48 h of mechanical ventilation (MV) between June 2002 and October 2003 were followed until ICU discharge, VAP diagnosis or death. Results Sixty patients (22.2%) developed VAP 5.9±3.6 days after admission. The overall incidence of VAP was 29 cases per 1000 ventilator-days. The daily hazard for developing VAP increased until day 8, and then decreased over the duration of stay in the ICU. The only statistically significant factor after multivariable analysis was gender, with being female reducing 57% the risk of pneumonia (hazard ratios (HR): 0.43; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.19–0.96). Conclusions The epidemiologic profile of VAP in terms of incidence, length of stay and clinical course resembles the general pattern described everywhere. Surprisingly, we could not identify any potentially modifiable risk factor for VAP. A comprehensive multicenter study is warranted. It should provide deep insight about the specific microbiological, genetic and clinic features of VAP in our setting.