Análisis de evidencia en investigaciones sobre toma de decisiones entre 2002 y 2012
ABSTRACT: This article presents a systematic review of 66 studies on decision making from psychology issued from 2002 through 2012, either in English or Spanish. These studies were classified according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)’s levels of evidence and degrees of reco...
- Autores:
-
Fernández Arbeláez, Jorge Iván
Villada Zapata, Johny Andrey
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/8974
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/8974
- Palabra clave:
- Elección (Psicología)
Juicio (Ética)
Psicología cognitiva
Psicología - Investigaciones
Toma de decisiones
Cognitive psychology
Choise (Psychology)
Decision-making
Judgment (Ethics)
Psychological research
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: This article presents a systematic review of 66 studies on decision making from psychology issued from 2002 through 2012, either in English or Spanish. These studies were classified according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)’s levels of evidence and degrees of recommendation. The research type, level, and design of every study were analyzed in detail, as well as the relationship between these factors and the levels of evidence in the studies involved. Stronger evidence for quality in research on physiological correlates of decision variables was found, as well as a lower quality level in comparative studies on psychological decision-making models. The latter show a high level of theoretical divergence and a lack of research focused on consolidating a coherent theoretical framework. |
|---|