Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.

ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To evaluate digital photography parameters affecting comparability with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) film protocol for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity grading. Methods.: ETDRS protocol photographs and four variations of digital images (uncompressed st...

Full description

Autores:
Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K
Danis, Ronald P
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32367
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32367
Palabra clave:
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diseño de Equipo
Equipment Design
Estudios de Seguimiento
Follow-Up Studies
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_84ffc098595fbd5d9d307ec956fbd9f4
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32367
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
title Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
spellingShingle Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diseño de Equipo
Equipment Design
Estudios de Seguimiento
Follow-Up Studies
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
title_short Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
title_full Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
title_fullStr Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
title_full_unstemmed Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
title_sort Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K
Danis, Ronald P
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K
Danis, Ronald P
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diseño de Equipo
Equipment Design
Estudios de Seguimiento
Follow-Up Studies
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
topic Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diseño de Equipo
Equipment Design
Estudios de Seguimiento
Follow-Up Studies
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
description ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To evaluate digital photography parameters affecting comparability with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) film protocol for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity grading. Methods.: ETDRS protocol photographs and four variations of digital images (uncompressed stereoscopic, compressed stereoscopic, uncompressed monoscopic, and uncompressed monoscopic wide-angle mosaic) of 152 eyes were independently evaluated by using ETDRS classifications. Digital formats were compared to film and each other for agreement on severity level, DR presence at ascending threshold, presence of the DR index lesion, and repeatability of grading. Study parameters included image resolution sufficient to distinguish small lesions, color balancing of digital images to film, documenting essential ETDRS classification retinal regions, similar magnification, and supplementary green-channel viewing. Results.: The κ statistic was substantial or near substantial between all digital formats and film for classifying severity levels (κ = 0.59–0.62; κw [linear weighted] = 0.83–0.87). The distribution of DR levels in all digital formats was not significantly different from that of the film (Bhapkar test, P = 0.09–0.44). The κ among digital formats for severity level was also substantial or near substantial (κ = 0.58–0.76, κw = 0.82–0.92). Differences between digital formats and film for grading severity level, severity threshold, or index lesions were not significant. The repeatability of grading between readers using film and all digital formats was also similar. Conclusions.: Digital format variations compared favorably with film for DR classification. Translating film characteristics (resolution, color/contrast) and protocol (magnification, retinal regions) to digital equivalents and augmentation of full color with green-channel viewing most likely contributed to the results.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-26T02:54:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-26T02:54:41Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Li HK, Danis RP, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 1;52(7):4717-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6303.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0146-0404
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32367
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.10-6303.
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1552-5783
identifier_str_mv Li HK, Danis RP, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 1;52(7):4717-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6303.
0146-0404
10.1167/iovs.10-6303.
1552-5783
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32367
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Association For Research In Vision And Ophthalmology
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Informed
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv San Luis, Estados Unidos
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/1/FlorezJose_2011_ComparabilityPhotographyRetinopathy.pdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/2/license_rdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5f644d8def769e5959d3c6853e080e1a
1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173240029675520
spelling Flórez Arango, José FernandoLi, Helen KDanis, Ronald PEsquivel, AdolKrupinski, Elizabeth2022-11-26T02:54:41Z2022-11-26T02:54:41Z2011Li HK, Danis RP, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 1;52(7):4717-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6303.0146-0404https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3236710.1167/iovs.10-6303.1552-5783ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To evaluate digital photography parameters affecting comparability with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) film protocol for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity grading. Methods.: ETDRS protocol photographs and four variations of digital images (uncompressed stereoscopic, compressed stereoscopic, uncompressed monoscopic, and uncompressed monoscopic wide-angle mosaic) of 152 eyes were independently evaluated by using ETDRS classifications. Digital formats were compared to film and each other for agreement on severity level, DR presence at ascending threshold, presence of the DR index lesion, and repeatability of grading. Study parameters included image resolution sufficient to distinguish small lesions, color balancing of digital images to film, documenting essential ETDRS classification retinal regions, similar magnification, and supplementary green-channel viewing. Results.: The κ statistic was substantial or near substantial between all digital formats and film for classifying severity levels (κ = 0.59–0.62; κw [linear weighted] = 0.83–0.87). The distribution of DR levels in all digital formats was not significantly different from that of the film (Bhapkar test, P = 0.09–0.44). The κ among digital formats for severity level was also substantial or near substantial (κ = 0.58–0.76, κw = 0.82–0.92). Differences between digital formats and film for grading severity level, severity threshold, or index lesions were not significant. The repeatability of grading between readers using film and all digital formats was also similar. Conclusions.: Digital format variations compared favorably with film for DR classification. Translating film characteristics (resolution, color/contrast) and protocol (magnification, retinal regions) to digital equivalents and augmentation of full color with green-channel viewing most likely contributed to the results.COL00362129application/pdfengAssociation For Research In Vision And OphthalmologyInformedSan Luis, Estados Unidosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.Retinopatía DiabéticaDiabetic RetinopathyDiseño de EquipoEquipment DesignEstudios de SeguimientoFollow-Up StudiesProcesamiento de Imagen Asistido por ComputadorImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibilidad de los ResultadosReproducibility of ResultsRetinaÍndice de Severidad de la EnfermedadSeverity of Illness IndexInvest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science47174725527ORIGINALFlorezJose_2011_ComparabilityPhotographyRetinopathy.pdfFlorezJose_2011_ComparabilityPhotographyRetinopathy.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf1451883https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/1/FlorezJose_2011_ComparabilityPhotographyRetinopathy.pdf5f644d8def769e5959d3c6853e080e1aMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8927https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/2/license_rdf1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32367/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5310495/32367oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/323672022-11-25 21:54:41.898Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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